![\"Nu](\"https:\/\/scontent-mxp1-1.xx.fbcdn.net\/v\/t1.0-9\/59978640_166461014361652_5491281890285453312_n.jpg?_nc_cat=107&_nc_ht=scontent-mxp1-1.xx&oh=3d499aa94b4691a2d292762e6a71d04a&oe=5D7544E8\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\u201cOrthodoxy means not thinking–not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.\u201d \u2013George Orwell<\/p>\n
Human dogs have proved ideal for brainwashing, for conditioning, training, being made to perform tricks for their masters. They internalise all of the values of the ruling elite and obediently carry them out to the letter. They are, as Orwell says, not even conscious of how\u00a0orthodox they are. To be conscious of it would be to be capable of challenging it, and that is one thing the dogs never do. The Islamic dogs would never dream of questioning the Koran or Mohammed. It is simply unthinkable. Consciousness is the biggest threat to dog religions. If the dogs ever became conscious, they would start to reflect on whether their beliefs are rational. So, the wolves that prey on them ensure they never become conscious. They keep them permanently on their knees in prayer; they insist that they memorise the whole Koran (a Muslim who succeeds in this task is called a hafiz); they demonise infidels and apostates, and they issue non-stop threats of eternal hellfire. The terror machine never rests for a moment.<\/p>\n The aim of the Illuminati is to bring about a quantum leap in evolution whereby the human dogs finally become conscious. Just as the time of the wolves must come to an end, so must that of the dogs. It\u2019s a Dog eats Man world:<\/p>\n Indonesia is a country where people traditionally eat dogs. It was reported that seven Indonesian dogs, starved of food while their owner was on holiday for two weeks, ate him when he returned home. His luggage was lined up outside his front door and was noticed by a neighbourhood guard who raised the alarm. \u201cHis skull was found in the kitchen, and his body was found in the front of his house,\u201d the local police chief said. \u201cWe suspect that the dogs were hungry, so they attacked Andre, because they had not been fed for fourteen days.\u201d Police also found bones of two other dogs, believed to have been killed and eaten by the others. So, is it a dog eat dog, dog eat man or man eat dog world?<\/p>\n Here are some comments that were posted on the internet about this story:<\/p>\n Dude it\u2019s your fault for not feeding your dogs… that\u2019s why they ate you.<\/p>\n What goes around comes around!!<\/p>\n This is what we call Animal Rights.<\/p>\n Good one, dogs.<\/p>\n Sounds a bit like a Shaggy Dog Story to me.<\/p>\n Some folks here are clearly more enamoured of dogs than a human life.<\/p>\n HaHaHa..Finally something worth reading. Poor dogs, but job well done!..F@#$%*G IDIOT!!!<\/p>\n This is called KARMA! He has paid for what he has done!<\/p>\n HA HA makes a change for the dogs to eat the human \u2013 bast**d got what he deserved!<\/p>\n Just want to say, all the comments about how a human life is greater than a dog\u2019s are a joke. We are all animals, and therefore we are all equal.<\/p>\n Well done, dogs \u2013 justice is served!<\/p>\n Divine justice.<\/p>\n Good for the dogs. If only they\u2019d known that eating his bones as well would give them a nice treat of bone marrow. Shame for the two eaten dogs. He deserved to be eaten three times if it were possible. Can only hope it was slow and painful.<\/p>\n Poor dogs. What is it with these people thinking it\u2019s ok to starve and mistreat animals? This story makes me so sad and angry at the world. The man was clearly a disgusting human being and deserved what he got quite frankly. Rot in hell.<\/p>\n So pleased they ate him.<\/p>\n Best story of justice for animal cruelty I have ever read!!!! Poor dogs. Just makes me want to protect mine even more.<\/p>\n ******<\/p>\n The vast majority of opinions expressed by online contributors asserted that it was \u201cjustice\u201d for a human being to be eaten alive by dogs, and that he was going to hell. Most of the comments were by women, and most were presumably dog owners. We now live in a world where human life is less important than pet life. What a totally fucked world. As someone commented, \u201cI just sat here and read most of these comments and I can\u2019t believe people think that it\u2019s ok or even agree with dogs eating a human being. I can truly say this world is unreal. Never would have thought people would think the way that they do. Don\u2019t get me wrong, I love animals \u2013 but what if that was a baby that was killed by the dogs?\u201d Chemical Wolves and Dogs:<\/p>\n The debate about wolves and dogs can be analysed scientifically in terms of three chemicals: testosterone, oestrogen and oxytocin. Testosterone is the wolf chemical and oestrogen the dog molecule. Oestrogen tames while testosterone increases aggression. What of oxytocin? It reinforces bonds between people, especially mothers and babies during breastfeeding. It\u2019s also released during sexual orgasm in both men and women and helps to create healthy interpersonal relationships and strong emotional bonds.<\/p>\n Oxytocin has been called the \u201cMoral Molecule\u201d since it binds people and makes them much less likely to harm each other. Those with deficient oxytocin release are often psychopathic. They have no ability to bond with other; no sympathy. Oxytocin could be called the \u201cJesus Drug\u201d if we charitably describe Jesus Christ as someone genuinely in favour of the Golden Rule of \u201cDo as you would be done by.\u201d Oxytocin makes that an actual possibility. Wolves become attached to their dogs, and vice versa, thanks to oxytocin. Oxytocin stops wolves from being psychopaths and slaughtering all of the dogs. So, human life is simply a continual interplay between aggression (immorality) mediated by testosterone, domestication (civilisation) mediated by oestrogen and bonding (morality) mediated by oxytocin.<\/p>\n Capitalism is a testosterone ideology and communism an oxytocin ideology (in principle). Fascism is excessively testosterone driven but also invokes a tremendous oxytocin bond between the people and their leader. Religious messiahs create immense oxytocin bonding, backed up by testosterone threats. The Stockholm syndrome whereby hostages become emotionally bonded to their captors largely sums up the way our world functions. Rationally, people should despise the rich elite, but the elite\u2019s relentless media propaganda and brainwashing succeeds in creating a powerful bond and dependency, underpinned by implicit threats. Christianity = Love?:<\/p>\n \u201cJW\u201d sent us a message saying:<\/p>\n Now I understand your teachings after reading The Armageddon Conspiracy. It\u2019s almost incomprehensible, but I understand why. I must say I am having a battle inside between two completely different ideals. One being Gnostic and the other Christian. I understand that love is the strongest boundary for us as humans, because when love is taken we get pain. I don\u2019t know if in this life I can defeat love, because love is me. Everything I live for is in regards of love. I\u2019ve never shown hatred to another soul in my life, and with what you say, until I do not have love, my chains are intact.<\/p>\n Our Reply:<\/p>\n Christianity has nothing at all to do with love, as its history has shown all too clearly. Christianity is about mindless obedience to Jesus Christ \u2013 and if you haven\u2019t understood that yet, you haven\u2019t understood anything at all. Why would a God of \u201cLove\u201d send people to hell? It\u2019s a fundamental contradiction in terms. Why would a God of Love claim that if people don\u2019t believe in him then they are damned? Why would a God of Love order a father to murder his son?<\/p>\n It sounds as if you are an extremely brainwashed individual.<\/p>\n Gnosticism is about knowledge and reason and if you want a world of people doing no harm to others, it is reason, not love that will achieve the goal. The propaganda regarding love is mind-bogglingly dumb. Every torturer, maniac, extremist and fanatic loves something or someone. Love is therefore the answer to nothing at all. Only rational conduct will save humanity.<\/p>\n If you haven\u2019t used your reason to see through the endless lies of Christianity then you are in deep trouble. Reason, not abandoning love, frees you from chains. Love has nothing to do with the matter in hand. Why don\u2019t you refer to reason in the same terms that you refer to love? Then you will at last free yourself. Otherwise, you will remain a permanent slave of delusion. Narrative Theory:<\/p>\n \u201cPolitical language \u2013 and with variations this is true of all political parties, from Conservatives to Anarchists \u2013 is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.\u201d –George Orwell<\/p>\n \u201cBut certainly for the present age, which prefers the sign to the thing signified, the copy to the original, representation to reality, the appearance to the essence… illusion only is sacred, truth profane. Nay, sacredness is held to be enhanced in proportion as truth decreases and illusion increases, so that the highest degree of illusion comes to be the highest degree of sacredness.\u201d –Feuerbach, Preface to the second edition of The Essence of Christianity<\/p>\n THE HUMAN MIND is designed to perceive causality everywhere. Imagine a world in which human minds were oblivious to causality. It would seem as if things happened without any reason. Everything would be random and we would be permanently surprised. We\u2019d never anticipate anything since we\u2019d never be thinking, \u201cAha, A will cause B to happen.\u201d The world would be quite literally inexplicable and bewildering, like a permanent LSD trip where space and time perception had disintegrated. So, it\u2019s essential for human minds to be inherently designed around causality \u2013 we must look for it everywhere and apply it all times. Only then can we make constant sense of the world.<\/p>\n However, there\u2019s a catastrophic problem. We can\u2019t see causality. We can\u2019t observe it in any way. What happens is that various observable things take place and then we apply causality to what we have witnessed. Causality is an inference, an interpretation of events. Unfortunately, like all interpretations, it can be wrong. Human history is the history of illusory causality, of making up absurd reasons for why B followed from A.<\/p>\n The earliest human beings said that spirits and gods caused things. They said that the whole universe was full of conscious minds that caused the world to operate as it did. The god of wind caused storms because he was angry with someone. The god of the sea caused tidal waves to punish someone who had failed to make a sacrifice to him. Zeus hurled lightning bolts when he was angry. Vikings claimed that thunder and lightning were created when Thor\u2019s mighty hammer struck something, the blow generating sparks (lightning) and a booming sound (thunder). All of the myths and legends of ancient times explained all the phenomena of the world according to the actions of a huge cast of unseen higher powers. People had no concept of the laws of physics or nature, but that didn\u2019t prevent them from detecting causality everywhere.<\/p>\n The monotheists got rid of all the competing gods and had just one, who created everything, designed everything and made everything work as it did. Even to this day, many monotheists think that anything that happens is literally the \u201cwill of God\u201d i.e. he personally made it happen. Nothing happens by accident or according to random factors or through natural law: God explicitly intervenes in his Creation. There are two ways in which the human mind applies causality \u2013 via Mythos or Logos thinking. Mythos thinking is what we\u2019ve just mentioned \u2013 making up stories and myths about what causes things. Its opposite is Logos thinking \u2013 using reason, logic, science, mathematics and philosophy to explain why things happen as they do.<\/p>\n In ancient times, Logos thinking was almost as crude as Mythos thinking since there was no established system of science, mathematics and philosophy to apply. The Logos thinkers had to grope their way towards plausible theories, and often mixed in Mythos elements. For example, early astronomical theories often invoked gods as the agents responsible for keeping planets in their orbits (which were invariably described as circular because the gods would of course choose perfect circles in which to move). For a long while, Mythos thinking and Logos thinking could happily co-exist. It wasn\u2019t until the rise of modern philosophy and science that the link was finally broken. Logos thinking then became highly objective, logical, and evidence-based. The scientific method was rigorously applied and ruled out all supernatural explanations for phenomena.<\/p>\n Mythos and Logos thinking are now the exact opposite. Any scientist would laugh at the idea that \u201cAllah\u201d caused anything, or that elves, spirits, fairies, ghosts, angels or whatever else had any causal agency. In terms of the human race, only 1% are strict Logos thinkers (the scientists, mathematicians and philosophers), and all the rest are stuck in the world of Mythos \u2013 religious thinking, superstition, conspiracy theories and story thinking. Human minds must assign causality and if they can\u2019t think of (or don\u2019t know) a rational Logos reason then they will use a Mythos reason instead, and indeed they will usually prefer a Mythos cause over a Logos cause. So, the vast majority of human beings are continually wrongly interpreting reality by attributing fantasy causality based on primitive stories and beliefs. Most conspiracy theories are built on a fantastic edifice of invented causality.<\/p>\n The essence of Mythos thinking is story telling rather than abstraction. Mythos is all about narrative. The Viking explanation of thunder and lightning is a wonderful narrative. Of course, it has zero connection with the truth, but it offered a FULL and emotionally satisfying explanation of the phenomenon of thunder and lightning as far as the ordinary Viking was considered. Anyone without a scientific understanding of thunder and lightning was forced to come up with some story about it, or it would seem like an unfathomable and deeply disturbing random happening, outside causality. The Vikings also thought that the rainbow was a bridge to heaven.<\/p>\n Other cultures considered it a divine sign, pointing to a glorious new era, or to a pot of gold (!). Human sacrifice was conducted by cultures such as the Aztecs as a deliberate means to appease the gods. They invented a wholly false system of causality based on what signs allegedly showed divine displeasure and what sacrifices were required in response. The witchcraft hysteria of Medieval Europe was another lethal example of an absurd causality being applied to explain natural phenomena. In the present day, most Muslims operate according to an entirely invented causality based on the will of Allah.<\/p>\n We thus reach a profoundly disturbing aspect of the human condition. Human beings are obsessed with causality, but not with truth (although many stupid people think the two are the same thing). Billions of Muslims genuinely believe that a crazy narrative told by a man on a starvation diet meditating in a cave for many weeks without any contact at all with any other human beings was the actual Word of God, transmitted to Mohammed via the Angel Gabriel. Now, in relation to Mohammed\u2019s experience, a Logos thinker would talk about severe disturbances in the brain chemistry of a fasting man leading to hallucinations, or about the vivid fantasies of a lonely man suffering from extreme sensory deprivation. Without stimulation, a human mind creates its own via fantasy and hallucination. Mohammed was a religiously minded man praying in a cave and seeking God, so it was no surprise that his hallucinations should take an extreme religious form.<\/p>\n Others have speculated that his visions were caused by epilepsy, or that he was hearing voices as a result of schizophrenia, or suffering from bipolar disorder and in his manic phase he thought himself God and, in his depressive phase, God\u2019s humblest slave. Julian Jaynes\u2019s theory of the bicameral mind, involving auditory hallucination in the right hemisphere of the brain giving commands to the subservient left hemisphere of the brain, would provide a neat explanation for Mohammed\u2019s experience. Indeed, all sorts of explanations can be advanced, any of which is infinitely more plausible than the one accepted by Muslims. Yet billions are attracted to the most improbable causal explanation. They have based the entire way they conduct their lives on the conclusion that Mohammed was neither mentally ill, nor hallucinating, nor lying, nor deluded. They have staked everything on the belief that God, or the Angel Gabriel to be more exact, spoke in Arab to an illiterate tribesman in a cave in order to communicate with the WHOLE of humanity.<\/p>\n Forget Mohammed, does it seem remotely likely that the Creator of the Universe would be unable to appear in front of his Creations and explain what life\u2019s all about? Why wouldn\u2019t the Creator simply address the human race directly, in all of their languages simultaneously? After all, if he\u2019s going to leave a book with his directions to the human race, why not read it aloud to everyone in their own tongue \u2013 then there could be no conceivable doubt. Why would he choose the extraordinary mechanism of communicating via bearded prophets telling incredibly tall tales, and who never had any witnesses for their incredible claims? Why didn\u2019t Jesus Christ announce on the Cross that if everyone turned up at his tomb at 7 am on Sunday, he would roll away the stone and reveal to them that he had returned from the dead? How come there wasn\u2019t a single witness to his resurrection, the most important event in Christianity? Why are there NEVER any witnesses? Does God have something to hide? Such as the fact that he\u2019s a total liar? Jesus Christ went to great trouble to show his wounds to Doubting Thomas to \u201cprove\u201d that he was who he said he was (even though he now resembled a gardener, according to his confidante Mary Magdalene in the Gospel of John). The Doubting Thomas episode demonstrates that Christ was cognizant of the need to prove his extraordinary claims, so why didn\u2019t he offer proof on a much grander scale to the whole of humanity?<\/p>\n It\u2019s an astonishing and frightening thing that so many people in our world are so able and willing to believe total nonsense. In fact, they seem to actively seek out nonsense, the more absurd the better. As Hitler realised, the more preposterous the claim, the bigger the lie, the more willing people are to accept it as ABSOLUTE TRUTH. Why? Because people are stupid, ignorant, superstitious, looking for big but simplistic explanations, for emotionally comforting explanations. Above all, they are victims of deadly brainwashing enforced on them by the wolves that prey on them. Mohammed was a wolf, or the instrument of a wolf, because only wolves ever say, \u201cObey or perish.\u201d<\/p>\n Only a wolf would set up the two fatal equations of Abrahamism:<\/p>\n 1) Obey me and you go to heaven = eternal pleasure.<\/p>\n 2) Disobey me and you go to hell = eternal pain.<\/p>\n This basic pleasure\/pain equation (ultimate carrot\/stick) is the most basic form of Pavlovian conditioning. And, really, much of our existence is a simple reflection of elementary but extremely potent conditioning\/ brainwashing\/ indoctrination. B.F. Skinner\u2019s school of behaviourism and operant conditioning was highly successful for a time because it seemed to chime with the relentless advance of science into all areas, including the workings of the mind. Skinner actually dismissed the existence of mind and consciousness. He thought that \u201cfreedom and dignity\u201d were illusory. All that mattered was the application of a stimulus and the resultant behaviour provoked by the stimulus. Both the stimulus (its intensity, duration, composition) and the consequent behaviour were fully scientifically observable, hence psychology could be brought into the realm of hard, objective science with no subjective elements at all. Skinner\u2019s ideas are unfashionable now, but not with the Illuminati. We hold his theories in high regard, even though we fundamentally reject his central thesis regarding the unimportance of mind.<\/p>\n The human race has been subjected to an immense program of operant condition aka brainwashing, indoctrination and mind control. To shatter that brainwashing once and for all, we have to use reverse operant conditioning. We have to make it the ultimate disgrace to be an Abrahamist or capitalist. We have to make people feel physically sick when they contemplate Abrahamism and greedy capitalism. Abrahamism and capitalism will be rendered anathema. It will become the ultimate social stigma to subscribe to Abrahamism and capitalism. Soon enough, no one will have anything to do with these belief systems because it will be socially unacceptable. Just as the leaders of America used relentless Abrahamist and capitalist propaganda to brainwash Americans, so the same tactics will be used to undo the brainwashing. There will be relentless anti-Abrahamist and anti-capitalist propaganda (we are referring here to the extreme form of capitalism that allows a tiny number of people to control most of the assets of the world, not to capitalism per se which can be made socially productive if operated properly).<\/p>\n Ultimately, the aim is to remove all forms of brainwashing and conditioning from the world. Every citizen must be truly free. But to the get to the Promised Land, we have to undo the incredible damage done to the human psyche throughout history, particularly by Abrahamism, the Devil\u2019s chosen religion, and capitalism, his chosen economic system. One objective that must be achieved is a huge advance in Logos thinking. All institutions must reflect Logos rather than Mythos. Narrative Reality:<\/p>\n Our world is dominated by narrative \u2013 by simple stories that provide an equally simplistic analysis of the world we live in. What is a \u201csoundbite\u201d? \u2013 it\u2019s an attempt to convert a complex issue into something that can be summed up in a sentence or phrase. This simple sentence or phrase then becomes \u201creality\u201d and replaces the complex underlying issues. Soundbites create a \u201csign system\u201d where reality is dissolved in favour of easy-to-remember but completely false (usually) mantras.<\/p>\n What is the sign system of Christianity? What are the Christian soundbites? \u201cJesus loves you. Jesus saves. Jesus died for your sins. Salvation through Jesus alone. Paradise shall be yours if you believe in Jesus.\u201d This is what the average Christian thinks \u201cChristianity\u201d is. This is the neat little Mythos that encapsulates their worldview. Of course, it\u2019s total bullshit. If you look past the Christian soundbites at the horrific underlying reality of Christianity, you feel sick at the sheer scale of deception involved. But only Logos thinkers go under the surface. Mythos people are surface thinkers; superficial, facile, trivial. They never dive down into the depths of complexity. They don\u2019t have the right diving gear. They would drown in seconds.<\/p>\n Our whole world operates at the surface level. There is no depth to 99% of humanity. Consider advertisements \u2013 30-second narratives designed to manipulate you emotionally into buying a product. Consider politicians \u2013 their speeches deliver no analysis. They do nothing but formulate soundbites and turn all the complex issues of government into a simplistic joke. All TV shows tell a narrative. Reality TV creates a narrative. Religious has its infantile parables (narratives). Capitalism declares its narrative soundbites: \u201cGreed is good.\u201d; \u201cProfit is Godly\u201d; \u201cLunch is for wimps.\u201d; \u201cWork hard and you can achieve the American Dream.\u201d Lawyers use soundbites relentlessly: \u201cIf the glove don\u2019t fit, you must acquit.\u201d (O.J. Simpson Trial). Popular songs, movies, Broadway shows, corporate brochures, sports events…they\u2019re all trying to create narratives that can be compressed into catchy, memorable soundbites.<\/p>\n Many people have noticed that movie trailers are often better than the movies themselves, or that the movie was fully explained by the trailer even though it was only a few seconds long. How many movies that looked good in the trailer turned out to be a total yawn? We live in a \u201ctrailer\u201d world where the main feature is compressed into a few pseudo-exciting frames, disguising the underlying tedium.<\/p>\n Books for \u201cdummies\u201d; \u201cLearn Quantum Mechanics in 3 Minutes\u201d \u2013 yeah, right! The whole world is trying to boil down the essence of everything into a 30-second advert, a six-word soundbite. But the world can\u2019t be reduced to this infantile level. Some things are immensely complex and there\u2019s no getting away from it. Our website is enormously complex. In fact, it\u2019s the most complex website on the planet. We try to simplify it as much as possible, but the fact remains that anyone who wants to understand Illuminism will have to work through two million words. That task is beyond the capabilities of most people.<\/p>\n The leaders of the world want you to stay stuck at the superficial level. They want you to be controlled by a few hot button phrases. How many Americans grew to despise Communism even though they knew absolutely nothing about it? Their rich capitalist ruling elite told them over and over again \u2013 \u201cThe only good commie is a dead commie.\u201d There were endless scare stories about \u201creds under the beds\u201d. And yet most average Americas haven\u2019t read even ONE word of Karl Marx. How can you legitimately have a visceral hatred of something you know nothing about it? YOU CAN\u2019T. But of course, you can if you\u2019ve been brainwashed. Christians sneer at the beliefs of Muslims and vice versa and yet what characterises both groups is that neither has ever read a word of the other\u2019s religion (in fact, most people are entirely ignorant of their own religion, never mind that of others). No one could accuse us of ignorance of what others believe. We understand them all too well. Our website provides an analysis of every major system of thought in world history. We detest Abrahamism because we know all about it; not because we are ignorant of it. To hate something for valid reasons you have to know what it is first. Most people just go straight to the hating, bypassing the knowledge part entirely.<\/p>\n There is no aspect of the mainstream world that isn\u2019t in the business of dumbing down everything to lowest common denominator statements that the most retarded people on earth can grasp. Abrahamism is an extreme form of mental retardation. Any intelligent person immediately rejects it as soon as they are old enough to understand it. But most people aren\u2019t intelligent. In fact, they\u2019re stupid. Deep down, most of them believe that God is actually supervising and causing everything. And that\u2019s the dumbest idea in the history of the cosmos. Given the importance of narrative, it\u2019s essential that everyone should be narratively literate. It may sound absurd, but in terms of your day-to-day life, nothing is more important than your understanding of narrative. Given that all information is presented to you in essentially narrative (Mythos) form, shouldn\u2019t you be an expert in narrative?<\/p>\n For this reason, the Illuminati provides all of its members with tuition in creative writing. Here is the list of creative writing books used by the Illuminati:<\/p>\n Save The Cat! The Last Book on Screenwriting You\u2019ll Ever Need by Blake Snyder<\/p>\n The Writer\u2019s Journey: Mythic Structure for Writers, 3rd Edition by Christopher Vogler<\/p>\n Story: Substance, Structure, Style and The Principles of Screenwriting by Robert McKee<\/p>\n Screenplay: The Foundations of Screenwriting by Syd Field<\/p>\n The Screenwriter\u2019s Problem Solver: How to Recognize, Identify, and Define Screenwriting Problems by Syd Field<\/p>\n Writing the Blockbuster Novel by Albert Zuckerman<\/p>\n The Art of Dramatic Writing by Lajos Egri<\/p>\n The Anatomy of Story: 22 Steps to Becoming a Master Storyteller by John Truby<\/p>\n A Story Is a Promise: Good Things to Know Before You Write That Screenplay, Novel, or Play by Bill Johnson<\/p>\n These books cover novel writing, plays and screenplays. They analyse such things as structure, character, plot, plot-points, turning points, climaxes, d\u00e9nouements, protagonists, antagonists, allies, enemies, tricksters, shape shifters, mentors, lovers, gods, anima\/animus figures, the shadow, id, egos, superego, raising the tension, building the stakes, making the reader care, empathy, sympathy, motivations, guilty secrets, psychological scarring, inner wounds. In other words, creative writing is applied psychology. Do you hate your boss at work? Do you hate your colleagues? Do you love them? Rather than treat all of the people in your life as real human beings, why not think of them instead as characters in a screenplay? Think of their motivation. What is it that makes them tick? Money? Status? The respect of their colleagues? Self-respect. Are they materialistic or idealistic? What\u2019s their home life like? What are their vulnerabilities? Does anything make them nervous? What\u2019s their secret fear? Can you detect their \u201cinner wound\u201d?<\/p>\n In order for novels, plays and screenplays to work, they must remind you of real people and make you identify with their lives and problems so that you take a vicarious interest in them. They are YOUR proxies in an exciting fictional world. So, the techniques of successful fiction writers are necessarily superb at producing realistic simulacra of people. But, in that case, why can\u2019t the same techniques be applied to REAL people? Just as a novelist analyses the characters of the fictional people who feature in his book and tries to make them as lifelike as possible, so you can do the reverse and analyse the real people in your life as fictional characters.<\/p>\n You will be astonished by how your opinion of people changes when you start to analyse them as fictional characters trying to conceal vulnerabilities and inner wounds. Think of the Pope \u2013 why did he choose a celibate life? Think of the Queen of England \u2013 is she terrified of a confrontation with a real person who rubbishes everything she stands for and calls a fraud and a phoney? Think of President Obama \u2013 is he riven with inner conflict over his white attitudes and how much he has let down the African Americans? All the Zionists and Masons of Wall Street \u2013 why are they so obsessed with money and materialism? What inner weakness are they trying to compensate for? Suddenly, all of the masters of the universe seem weak, sad and pathetic. They\u2019re no longer intimidating. They\u2019re just people like everyone else, with neuroses, anxieties, vulnerabilities, inner secrets and wounds, and hence they can easily be overthrown.<\/p>\n In The Millionaires\u2019 Death Club by Mike Hockney, the decision was taken to portray a central character \u2013 Zara \u2013 as psychologically invulnerable. She is exceptionally beautiful, exceptionally intelligent, exceptionally rich, exceptionally cultured, exceptionally classy and exceptionally confident. That\u2019s how most ordinary people imagine the members of the Old World Order, but of course they\u2019re not like that at all. They certainly love to present themselves in a perfect light, but there are any number of demons lurking behind the facade.<\/p>\n You can make your life much more exciting by treating it as a movie, and by treating all of the real people you meet as fictional characters. Of course, by doing so, you may uncover real truths about them, not fictional ones. Keep your eyes and ears peeled at all times for the narratives that are being continually directed at you by advertisers, politicians, businessmen, economists, bankers, media commentators, popes and pastors \u2013 they\u2019re all spinning you a line.<\/p>\n Then there are the conspiracy theorists, the anarchists, the libertarians and so on, all furiously selling their particular spin too. The whole world is being deafened by soundbites and made dizzy by spin-doctors. Storytellers are everywhere, selling you yarns. What is the Bible except a collection of ludicrous tales about ancient Jewish tribesmen wandering around in the desert pretending they are special? Above all, use the narrative theory of life to become your own script doctor. Fix the faulty script. Fix all the elements of your life story that have gone wrong. Become a fictional God and then a real God! The Movie Theory of Life:<\/p>\n The Last Bling King by Mike Hockney presents the thought experiment of analysing your life as a movie. Would anyone want to see the movie in which you are the star? Or is it the most boring movie of all time?<\/p>\n \u201cDE\u201d sent us the following message:<\/p>\n I found your website the Armageddon Conspiracy most enlightening. I\u2019ve read the Armageddon conspiracy and the Last Bling King. They left me in awe. I was wondering how I could get involved… I mean really involved, to get stuck in. I do not desire to let things slip past. I was quite taken by the movie of your life way of thinking.<\/p>\n
\n__________<\/p>\n
\n__________<\/p>\n
\n__________<\/p>\n
\n__________<\/p>\n
\n__________<\/p>\n
\n__________<\/p>\n