{"id":6201,"date":"2020-12-04T14:14:55","date_gmt":"2020-12-04T13:14:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/?p=6201"},"modified":"2020-12-04T14:24:00","modified_gmt":"2020-12-04T13:24:00","slug":"final-point-7","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/?p=6201","title":{"rendered":"Final Point (7)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Final Point (7)<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span>
<\/span><\/span><\/span>(rom. \/ eng.)<\/span><\/span><\/span>

De multe ori putem nota contradic\u0163ii importante, chiar \u015fi \u00een c\u0103r\u0163ile autorilor AC \u015fi asta este normal dac\u0103 lu\u0103m \u00een considera\u0163ie Punctul de Vedere. Ceea ce este acceptabil prin prisma Principiilor Iluministe dintr-un Punct de Vedere, poate fi inacceptabil dintr-un altul. Este precum un Proces Dialectic. Important este s\u0103 faci Sinteza just\u0103 \u015fi s\u0103 nu cazi \u00een gre\u015feala de a emite judec\u0103\u0163i unilaterale \u015fi s\u0103 accep\u0163i <\/span><\/span><\/span>integral sau \u00een mare parte <\/span><\/span><\/span>doar Teza, sau Antiteza.
<\/span><\/span><\/span>O s\u0103 dau c\u00e2teva exemple:

Pe de-o parte, neg\u0103m Tradition Directedness, iar pe de alta <\/span><\/span><\/span>promov\u0103m<\/span><\/span><\/span> Statul Puternic, Monocultural, acesta din urm\u0103 <\/span><\/span><\/span>fiind<\/span><\/span><\/span> str\u00e2ns legat de Tradi\u0163ia Cultural\u0103, Filosofic\u0103, \u015etiin\u0163ific\u0103 \u015famd. Nu po\u0163i avea deci un Stat Puternic, f\u0103r\u0103 a fi ancorat \u00een Tradi\u0163iile proprii, evident cele Pozitive, conforme Principiilor Iluministe. A renun\u0163a la propriile Tradi\u0163ii \u00een numele Multiculturalismului \u015fi a Corectitudinii Politice, este un act Masochist. \u00cen cazul Europei Liberale, se risc\u0103 Islamizarea continentului, islamicii <\/span><\/span><\/span>fiind puternic <\/span><\/span><\/span>Tradition Directed, g\u0103s<\/span><\/span><\/span>esc<\/span><\/span><\/span> aici o Baleg\u0103 Moale. <\/span><\/span><\/span>Ac\u0163ion\u00e2nd E<\/span><\/span><\/span>MO\u0162IONAL<\/span><\/span><\/span>, zeci de \u201eBinef\u0103c\u0103tori\u201d <\/span><\/span><\/span>(ONG-uri, Filantropi miliardari) <\/span><\/span><\/span>fac \u00een realitate un Trafic de Emigran\u0163i Economici spre coastele europene <\/span><\/span><\/span>cu consecin\u0163<\/span><\/span><\/span>e<\/span><\/span><\/span> economice, sociale \u015fi culturale importante. <\/span><\/span><\/span>Migran\u0163ii<\/span><\/span><\/span> sunt destina\u0163i a forma o adev\u0103rat\u0103 Armat\u0103 Proletar\u0103 De Rezerv\u0103 <\/span><\/span><\/span>de noi Sclavi, <\/span><\/span><\/span>care s\u0103 duc\u0103 inexorabil la o Nivelare \u00cen Jos a societ\u0103\u0163ii din toate punctele de vedere.<\/span><\/span><\/span>
Logic ar fi ca <\/span><\/span><\/span>\u201eONG-urile Soro\u015fiste\u201d<\/span><\/span><\/span> \u015fi miliardarii filantropi <\/span><\/span><\/span>s<\/span><\/span><\/span>\u0103 foloseasc\u0103 Resursele Financiare pe care le au la dispozi\u0163ie <\/span><\/span><\/span>\u015fi altele ce trebuiesc furnizate de statele occidentale, inclusiv ca R\u0103scump\u0103rare <\/span><\/span><\/span>a<\/span><\/span><\/span> Gre\u015felilor Trecute, <\/span><\/span><\/span>ca s<\/span><\/span><\/span>\u0103-i ajute pe ace\u015fti emigran\u0163i acas\u0103 la ei. S\u0103 protesteze <\/span><\/span><\/span>\u201ebinef\u0103c\u0103torii\u201d <\/span><\/span><\/span>\u00eempotriva R\u0103zboaielor Neocoloniale, <\/span><\/span><\/span>\u00eempotriva Capitalismului Pr\u0103d\u0103tor, <\/span><\/span><\/span>\u00eempotriva Monopolulilor care fur\u0103 Resurse din aceste \u0163\u0103ri de emigra\u0163ie, <\/span><\/span><\/span>\u00cempotriva Privilegia\u0163ilor de tip Gates, Bezos, Soros, Rotschild<\/span><\/span><\/span> \u015famd.
<\/span><\/span><\/span>A<\/span><\/span><\/span>r trebui s\u0103 <\/span><\/span><\/span>se <\/span><\/span><\/span>priceap\u0103 R<\/span><\/span><\/span>A\u0162IONAL<\/span><\/span><\/span> c\u0103 golirea acestor \u0163\u0103ri de For\u0163a de Munc\u0103 T\u00e2n\u0103r\u0103 \u015fi \u015ecolarizat\u0103, va avea efecte grave pentru <\/span><\/span><\/span>cei<\/span><\/span><\/span> r\u0103ma\u015fi, <\/span><\/span><\/span>\u015fi pe termen lung, chiar \u015fi pentru Occident.<\/span><\/span><\/span> Acela\u015fi Ra\u0163ionament e valabil \u015fi \u00een <\/span><\/span><\/span>celelalte regiuni ale planetei<\/span><\/span><\/span>.
<\/span><\/span><\/span>Ceea ce fac <\/span><\/span><\/span>aceste ONG-uri<\/span><\/span><\/span>, este asemenea Pomenii la semafoare, sau din fa\u0163a Bisericilor Avraamice.
Cineva spunea: <\/span><\/span><\/span>\u201enu trebuie s\u0103 dai Pe\u015fti unui s\u0103rman, ci s\u0103-l aju\u0163i s\u0103 Pescuiasc\u0103!\u201d<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span>
<\/span><\/span><\/span>Asta e o form\u0103 RA\u0162IONAL\u0102 a SOLIDARIT\u0102\u0162II.
Conform acestei Logici, sunt contrar \u015fi <\/span><\/span><\/span>Venitului de Baz\u0103 Universal <\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span>(UBI)<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span>:<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span> prefer c\u0103 s\u0103 \u201emunceasc\u0103 to\u0163i \u015fi mai pu\u0163in\u201d, numai astfel se poate \u00eempiedica apari\u0163ia Armatei Proletare De Rezerv\u0103!!!

<\/span><\/span><\/span>Am scris despre Tradition Directedness, dar a\u015f putea s\u0103 scriu \u015fi despre Inner Directedness \u00een acela\u015fi mod, dar v\u0103 las pe voi s\u0103 G\u00e2ndi\u0163i asupra <\/span><\/span><\/span>Dualit\u0103\u0163ii <\/span><\/span><\/span>c<\/span><\/span><\/span>aracteristicilor<\/span><\/span><\/span> psihologice.

<\/span><\/span><\/span>O alt\u0103 Contradic\u0163ie des \u00eent\u00e2lnit\u0103 inclusiv \u00een c\u0103r\u0163ile AC este preponderen\u0163a Tezei Capitalism \u00een raport cu Antiteza Comunism.
Se promoveaz\u0103 Capitalismul Social \u015fi se contempl\u0103 prea pu\u0163in Comunismul ca Antitez\u0103 pentru o Sintez\u0103 Superioar\u0103, insist\u00e2ndu-se pe \u201e\u00eenfr\u00e2ngerea definitiv\u0103 a Comunismului\u201d.<\/span><\/span><\/span>

<\/span><\/span><\/span>S\u0103 ne g\u00e2ndim la Testele de Personalitate Myers-Briggs.

<\/span><\/span><\/span>Introversi<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span>on<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span> (I) vs. Extr<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span>a<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span>versi<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span>on<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span> (E)
Intuiti<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span>on<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span> (N) vs. Sen<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span>sing<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span> (S)
<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span>Thinking<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span> (T) vs. <\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span>Feeling<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span> (F)
Jud<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span>ging<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span> (J) vs. Perce<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span>iving<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span> (P)<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span>
<\/span><\/span><\/span>
Fiecare din noi are o Amprent\u0103 <\/span><\/span><\/span>Psihic\u0103 <\/span><\/span><\/span>Unic\u0103 datorat\u0103 procentelor difer<\/span><\/span><\/span>en\u0163iate \u00een cele 4 dihotomii. <\/span><\/span><\/span>O<\/span><\/span><\/span> Minte Abraxian\u0103, este o Minte care atinge Echilibrul Perfect \u00een toate dihotomiile. Omenirea se afl\u0103 sub imperiul \u201ep\u0103r\u0163ii drepte\u201d \u015fi c\u0103 e imperios necesar\u0103 o <\/span><\/span><\/span>evolu\u0163ie<\/span><\/span><\/span> spre st\u00e2nga <\/span><\/span><\/span>pentru realizarea HOMEOSTAZEI PSIHICE a Omenirii.

<\/span><\/span><\/span>\u00cen acest context, promovarea Capitalismului Social, cu men\u0163inerea Propriet\u0103\u0163ii \u015fi Ini\u0163iativei Private, inclusiv a Propriet\u0103\u0163ii Intelectuale, \u015fi cu un raport <\/span><\/span><\/span>exagerat <\/span><\/span><\/span>de redistribuire a Resurselor de 1:20, este dup\u0103 opinia mea o \u201edeplasare spre st\u00e2nga\u201d insuficient\u0103 pentru <\/span><\/span><\/span>o stare de <\/span><\/span><\/span>Echilibru. <\/span><\/span><\/span>Mult mai RA\u0162IONAL ar fi Spiritul Free Source \u015fi \u00eenlocuirea Propriet\u0103\u0163ii Private cu Proprietatea Comun\u0103 (Comunitarianism Iluminist) ce ar garanta afirmarea unui adev\u0103rat Stat Puternic.
<\/span><\/span><\/span>\u00cen C\u0103r\u0163ile noastre sunt prezentate \u201eprofetic\u201d \u00eenc\u0103 dinaintea crizei Corona Hoax, CUM ar ar\u0103ta un astfel de stat bazat pe Prorpietatea Comunitarian\u0103. Mai mult, am anticipat actualul curs de DESCRE\u015eTERE aflat pe Agenda OWO. Deosebirea dintre scenariul OWO \u015fi cel promovat de noi este c\u0103 OWO are \u00een vedere o DESCRE\u015eTERE NEFERICIT\u0102, pe c\u00e2nd noi prefigur\u0103m o DESCRE\u015eTERE FERICIT\u0102. <\/span><\/span><\/span>Ambele scenarii au \u00een comun NESUSTENABILITATEA actualei Paradigme socio-economice.<\/span><\/span><\/span>
\u00cen<\/span><\/span><\/span> capitolele ce vor urma, voi detalia aceast\u0103 diferen\u0163\u0103 substan\u0163ial\u0103.
<\/span><\/span><\/span>Repet cu regret c\u0103 SUSTENABILITATEA este ignorat\u0103 de ilumini\u015ftii de fb \u015fi de autorii AC.<\/span><\/span><\/span>
<\/span><\/span><\/span>
<\/span><\/span><\/span>Revenind la tema Echilibrului, trebuie remarcat c\u0103 t<\/span><\/span><\/span>o\u0163i ilumini\u015ftii de fb elogiaz\u0103 China, uit\u00e2nd c\u0103 e un stat condus de un Partid Unic <\/span><\/span><\/span>Comunist<\/span><\/span><\/span>!? P\u0103i atunci de ce s\u0103 nu numim Noua Paradigm\u0103 <\/span><\/span><\/span>pentru O Nou\u0103 Lume, <\/span><\/span><\/span> Comunism Meritocratic Iluminist??? Eu v\u0103 vorbesc de pe pozi\u0163ia unuia care Comunismul l-a tr\u0103it, ci nu <\/span><\/span><\/span>l<\/span><\/span><\/span>-a cunoscut din Media, sau <\/span><\/span><\/span>de pe <\/span><\/span><\/span>b\u0103ncile \u015fcolilor capitaliste. Eu \u015eTIU ce nu era Bun \u00een Comunism \u015fi v\u0103 asigur c\u0103 era mult mai mult dec\u00e2t se poate \u201e\u00eemprumuta\u201d din Capitalism. Cu toate astea, o Sintez\u0103 Superioar\u0103 trebuie s\u0103 abandoneze definitiv \u015eI referirea la Comunism: pur \u015fi simplu, propun conceptul de Meritocra\u0163ie Iluminist\u0103, care ar fi mult mai probabil acceptat de China, dec\u00e2t cel de Capitalism Social. E adev\u0103rat c\u0103 azi China este un stat ce promoveaz\u0103 \u201eforme de Capitalsm\u201d, dar este numai o \u201einducere \u00een eroare a OWO\u201d, ce se va termina odat\u0103 cu eliminarea Globaliz\u0103rii din Ecua\u0163ie. Chinezii \u00eel vor \u201eucide\u201d \u015fi pe Mammon c\u00e2t de cur\u00e2nd, <\/span><\/span><\/span>YHWH fiind deja \u201emort\u201d<\/span><\/span><\/span>. <\/span><\/span><\/span>Primul pas va fi desfiin\u0163area Unicului Partid \u015fi \u201e\u00eenlocuirea\u201d sa cu NICIUN PARTID \u015fi cu o Mas\u0103 Rotund\u0103 Meritocratic\u0103, pun\u00e2nd astfel de-o parte IDEOLOGIA COMUNIST\u0102 \u015fi DIVIZIUNEA hr\u0103nit\u0103 de Democra\u0163ie \u015fi evolu\u00e2nd spre UNITATEA \u00een jurul unor Valori Iluministe Meritocratice… cel pu\u0163in, sper asta!?
<\/span><\/span><\/span>Se vehiculeaz\u0103 ideea par\u0163ial gre\u015fit\u0103 c\u0103 dispari\u0163ia Comunismului ar fi datorat\u0103 exclusiv lipsei de cointeresare a popula\u0163iei pe fondul unei Ideologii <\/span><\/span><\/span>egalit<\/span><\/span><\/span>aliste. \u0162in s\u0103 precizez c\u0103 Rom\u00e2nia se declara ca \u015fi celelalte \u0163\u0103ri est europene ca fiind SOCIALIST\u0102 pe CALEA COMUNISMULUI. Dec\u0103derea \u0163\u0103rilor socialiste s-a datorat Gre\u015felii de a se \u00eencadra \u00eentr-o Economie De Pia\u0163\u0103!!! Dac\u0103 aceste \u0163\u0103ri s-ar fi deta\u015fat de aceasta, ar fi putut coexista cu \u0163\u0103rile dezvoltate, <\/span><\/span><\/span>ca Grup Autonom, <\/span><\/span><\/span>ba chiar le-ar fi dep\u0103\u015fit \u00een timp datorit\u0103 Educa\u0163iei superioare \u015fi gratuite, Disciplinei, Anti-Avraamismului, S\u0103n\u0103t\u0103\u0163ii garantate gratis pentru to\u0163i \u015famd.
<\/span><\/span><\/span>Rom\u00e2nia era Suveran\u0103, de\u0163inea TOATE RESURSELE materiale \u015fi umane \u015fi le administra RA\u0162IONAL, nu avea DATORII EXTERNE, era independent\u0103 de Rusia \u00eenc\u0103 din 1969, avea o Industrie \u015fi Agricultur\u0103 performan\u021be \u015fi suficiente pentru a-\u015fi sus\u0163ine AUTONOMIA, YHWH \u015fi MAMMON fuseser\u0103 \u201eomor\u00e2\u0163i\u201d\u015famd.
<\/span><\/span><\/span>Azi am pierdut TOT de c\u00e2nd Capitalismul a fost reinstaurat.
Desigur c\u0103 nu totul era Perfect, dar era cu siguran\u0163\u0103 o situa\u0163ie mult mai apropiat\u0103 de MERITOCRA\u0162IA ILUMINIST\u0102!!<\/span><\/span><\/span>
Ceea ce a minat cu succes aceste \u0163\u0103ri <\/span><\/span><\/span>socialiste <\/span><\/span><\/span>au fost Propaganda OWO \u015fi Tr\u0103darea Nomenclaturii ce nu se mai mul\u0163umea cu o rat\u0103 de distribu\u0163ie a Resurselor de 1:6, ci voia mai mult, a\u015fa cum <\/span><\/span><\/span>le <\/span><\/span><\/span>oferea Capitalismul.
<\/span><\/span><\/span>A\u015fa cum spune un proverb rom\u00e2nesc, \u201eTot R\u0103ul Spre Bine!\u201d
Azi cunoa\u015ftem li Capitalismul, <\/span><\/span><\/span>vedem China de azi, <\/span><\/span><\/span>deci suntem cei mai indica\u0163i pentru a face o Sintez\u0103 Superioar\u0103.<\/span><\/span><\/span>
<\/span><\/span><\/span>

<\/span><\/span><\/span>\"Why


<\/span><\/span><\/span>Final Point (7)<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span>
<\/span><\/span><\/span>(rom. \/ eng.)<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

We can often note important contradictions, even in the books of AC authors, and this is normal if we consider the Point of View. What is acceptable in the light of the Illuminist Principles from one point of view may be unacceptable from another. It’s like a dialectical process. It is important to make a Superior Synthesis and not to make the mistake of issuing unilateral judgments and to accept in whole or in great part only the Thesis, or the Antithesis.
<\/span><\/span><\/span>I will give some examples:<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

On the one hand, we deny Tradition Directedness, and on the other hand we promote the Strong, Monocultural State, the latter being closely linked to the Cultural, Philosophical, Scientific Tradition and so on. So you cannot have a Powerful State without being anchored in your own Traditions, obviously the Positive ones, according to the Illuminist Principles. Giving up one’s own Traditions in the name of Multiculturalism and Political Correctness is a Masochistic act. In the case of the Liberal Europe, there is a risk of Islamization of the continent, the Islamists being strongly Tradition Directed, they find here a Soft Manure. Acting EMOTIONALLY, dozens of “Benefactors” (NGOs, billionaire philanthropists) are actually trafficking Economic Emigrants to European coasts with important economic, social and cultural consequences. The migrants are destined to form a true Proletarian Reserve Army of new Slaves, which will inexorably lead to a Downward Leveling of society from all points of view.
<\/span><\/span><\/span>It would be logical for “Sorosist NGOs” and philanthropic billionaires to use the financial resources they have at their disposal, and others that need to be provided by Western states, including as a ransom for past mistakes, to help the <\/span><\/span><\/span>potential<\/span><\/span><\/span> emigrants <\/span><\/span><\/span>\u00een their own countries<\/span><\/span><\/span>. T<\/span><\/span><\/span>hey should<\/span><\/span><\/span> protest against the Neocolonial Wars, against Predatory Capitalism, against the Monopolies that steal Resources from these countries of emigration, against the Privileged like Gates, Bezos, Soros, Rothschild and so on. They should rationally understand that emptying these countries of the Young and Educated Labor Force will have serious effects for those who remain, and in the long run, even for the West. The same reasoning applies to other parts of the world.
<\/span><\/span><\/span>What these NGOs do is like alms at traffic lights, or in front of the Abrahamic Churches.
<\/span><\/span><\/span>Someone was saying, “You don’t have to give Pisces to a poor man, but you have to help him fish!”
<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span>This is a RATIONAL form of SOLIDARITY.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

According to this Logic, I am also opposed to the Universal Basic Income (UBI)<\/b>: I prefer that \u201ceveryone works less\u201d, only in this way can the emergence of the Proletarian Reserve Army be prevented !!!<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

I wrote about Tradition Directedness, but I could write about Inner Directedness in the same way, but I leave it to you to Think about the Duality of Psychological Characteristics.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Another contradiction often encountered even in AC books is the preponderance of the Thesis Capitalism in relation to the Antithesis of Communism.
<\/span><\/span><\/span>Social Capitalism is promoted and Communism is too little contemplated as Antithesis for a Superior Synthesis, insisting on the “final defeat of Communism.”<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Consider the Myers-Briggs Personality Tests.
<\/span><\/span><\/span>Introversion (I) vs. Extraversion (E)
<\/span><\/span><\/span>Intuition (N) vs. Sensing (S)
<\/span><\/span><\/span>Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F)
<\/span><\/span><\/span>Judging (J) vs. Perceiving (P)

Each of us has a Unique Psychic Fingerprint due to the differentiated percentages in the 4 dichotomies. An Abraxian Mind is a Mind that achieves Perfect Balance in all dichotomies. Humanity is under the rule of the “right side” and that it is imperative to evolve to the left to achieve the PSYCHOLOGICAL HOMEOSTASIS of Humanity.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

In this context, the promotion of Social Capitalism, with the maintenance of Private Property and Initiative, including Intellectual Property, and with an exaggerated ratio of redistribution of Resources of 1:20, is in my opinion an insufficient “shift to the left” for a state of Equilibrium. . Much RATIONAL would be the Spirit of Free Source and the replacement of Private Property with Common Property (Illuminist Communitarianism) which would guarantee the assertion of a true Powerful State.
<\/span><\/span><\/span>In our books are presented “prophetically” even before the Corona Hoax crisis, HOW such a state based on Communitarian Property would look like. Moreover, we anticipated the current DEGROWTH course on the OWO Agenda. The difference between the OWO scenario and the one we promoted is that OWO is considering an UNHAPPY DEGROWTH, while we foreshadow a HAPPY DEGROWTH. Both scenarios have in common the UNSUSTAINABILITY of the current socio-economic paradigm.
<\/span><\/span><\/span>In the following chapters, I will detail this substantial difference.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Returning to the theme of Equilibrium, it should be noted that all fb illuminists praise China, forgetting that it is a state led by a Single Communist Party !? Well then why not call the New Paradigm for a New World, Illuminist Meritocratic Communism ??? I am speaking to you from the position of one who lived Communism, <\/span><\/span><\/span>who<\/span><\/span><\/span> did not know it from the Media, or from the benches of capitalist schools. I KNOW what was not Good in Communism and I assure you that it was much more than can be “borrowed” from Capitalism. However, a Higher Synthesis must also abandon the reference to Communism: I simply propose the concept of Illuminist Meritocracy, which would be more likely to be accepted by China than that of Social Capitalism. It is true that today China is a state that promotes “forms of capitalism,” but it is only a “misleading of the OWO,” which will end with the elimination of globalization from the equation. The Chinese will “kill” Mammon soon, as YHWH is already “dead.” The first step will be the abolition of the One Party and its “replacement” with NO PARTY and a Meritocratic Round Table, thus setting aside COMMUNIST IDEOLOGY and DIVISION fueled by Democracy and evolving towards UNITY around Meritocratic Illuministt Values \u200b\u200b… at least , I hope so!?
The partially wrong idea is circulating that the disappearance of Communism in the Eastern Europe would be due exclusively to the lack of interest of the population on the background of an egalitarian ideology. I would like to mention that Romania declared itself, like the other Eastern European countries, as a SOCIALIST on the Path of COMMUNISM. The decline of the socialist countries was due to the mistake of being part of a Market Economy !!! If these countries had detached themselves from it, they could have coexisted with the developed countries, as an Autonomous Group, and even surpassed them in time due to higher and free Education, Discipline, Anti-Abrahamism, Free Guaranteed Health for all and so on.
Romania was Sovereign, owned ALL material and human RESOURCES and administered them RATIONALLY, had no EXTERNAL DEBTS, was independent of Russia since 1969, had an enaugh performant Industry and Agriculture sufficient to support its AUTONOMY, YHWH and MAMMON had been “killed” and so on.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Today we have lost EVERYTHING since Capitalism was restored.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Of course, not everything was Perfect, but it was certainly a situation much closer to the ILLUMINIST MERITOCRACY !!
What successfully undermined these <\/span><\/span><\/span>socialist <\/span><\/span><\/span>countries were OWO Propaganda and the Betrayal of Nomenclature, which was no longer content with a 1: 6 resource distribution rate, but wanted more, as Capitalism offered them.
As a Romanian proverb says, “All Evil is For Good” … <\/span><\/span><\/span>t<\/span><\/span><\/span>oday we know Capitalism <\/span><\/span><\/span>too<\/span><\/span><\/span>, we see today’s China, so we are best placed to make a Superior Synthesis.
<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Final Point (7)(rom. \/ eng.) De multe ori putem nota contradic\u0163ii importante, chiar \u015fi \u00een c\u0103r\u0163ile autorilor AC \u015fi asta este normal dac\u0103 lu\u0103m \u00een considera\u0163ie Punctul de Vedere. Ceea ce este acceptabil prin prisma Principiilor Iluministe dintr-un Punct de Vedere, poate fi inacceptabil dintr-un altul. Este precum un Proces Dialectic. Important este s\u0103 faci […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3092],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6201"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6201"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6201\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6204,"href":"http:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6201\/revisions\/6204"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6201"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}