{"id":4741,"date":"2018-02-09T20:16:59","date_gmt":"2018-02-09T19:16:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/?p=4741"},"modified":"2018-02-10T17:41:11","modified_gmt":"2018-02-10T16:41:11","slug":"mathematicos-6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/?p=4741","title":{"rendered":"Mathematicos (6)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Cuvinte \u0219i Numere<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201eAdev\u0103rul<\/strong> refuz\u0103 cuvintele create de om pentru a-l descrie. Rezultatul Cuvintelor<\/strong> este Mytos<\/strong>… Credin\u021b\u0103, Opinie, Interpretare<\/strong>… concepte omene\u0219ti ale Realit\u0103\u021bii.<\/strong>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Antidotul este Logos.<\/strong> Dac\u0103 Mythos este Cuv\u00e2ntul, Logosul este Numarul.<\/strong> Ne apropiem cu at\u00e2t mai mult de Adev\u0103r<\/strong>, cu at\u00e2t mai mult cu c\u00e2t folosim Numerele Ontologice<\/strong> pentru a-l descrie. Singularit\u0103\u021bile zero \/ infinit<\/strong> nu pot fi ignorate \u00een niciun sistem Logos.<\/strong>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Textele Religioase<\/span><\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>sunt false deoarece nu folosesc Matematica<\/strong> (Numerele). \u0218tiin\u021ba<\/strong> e pozi\u0163ionat\u0103 mai bine dec\u00e2t Religia<\/strong> pentru c\u0103 o face, dar o face<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>incomplet, nefolosind TOATE Numerele, alunec\u00e2nd \u00een filosofia gre\u0219it\u0103 (Mythos) a Empirismului \u0219i Materialismului.<\/strong>
\nMatematica Abstract\u0103<\/strong> este inferioar\u0103 Matematicii Ontologice<\/strong> deoarece, ca \u015fi \u015etiin\u021ba, nu reu\u0219e\u0219te s\u0103 defineasc\u0103 \u0219i s\u0103 utilizeze corect Numerele.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201e<\/span>Lucrarea lui Descartes<\/strong> a fost punctul culminant al unui proces de eliberare a Algebrei<\/strong> de Cuvinte<\/strong>, dup\u0103 cum Geometria greac\u0103 a eliberat Construc\u021biile de Numere. Odat\u0103 ce a oferit un formalism pentru descrierea rela\u021biilor algebrice, progresul a fost rapid. Dup\u0103 patruzeci de ani de la publicarea Geometriei Algebrice<\/strong> a lui Descartes<\/strong>, filosoful german \u0219i matematicianul Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz<\/strong> (1646-1716) a creat o Algebr\u0103 a Infinitului<\/strong>. Aceasta este ceea ce numim \u201eCalculul”<\/strong>, un instrument puternic pentru analiza Cre\u0219terii<\/strong> \u0219i a Schimb\u0103rii.<\/strong>
\nIsaac Newton<\/strong> (1642-1727) a f\u0103cut o descoperire echivalent\u0103 mai \u00eenainte, dar el a extins doar nota\u021bia lui Descartes, mai degrab\u0103 dec\u00e2t s\u0103-l dep\u0103\u0219easc\u0103, a\u0219a c\u0103 este forma leibnizian\u0103 de Calcul, cea care predomin\u0103 ast\u0103zi. Astfel, au fost doi filozofi, Descartes<\/strong> \u0219i Leibniz<\/strong> [Mike Hockney: Idealist-Rationali\u015fti!<\/strong>], care au creat Nota\u0163iile \u0219i Ideile care au format Matematica<\/strong> de atunci. … Procesul de a g\u0103si c\u00e2t de repede se schimb\u0103 Cantitatea se nume\u0219te Diferen\u021biere<\/strong>. C\u00e2nd Diferen\u0163iem o func\u021bie, ob\u021binem rata de Schimbare a acesteia. “<\/span>– Ziauddin Sardar \u0219i Jerry Ravetz\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Mintea \u0219i Corpul<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Cum se rela\u0163ioneaz\u0103 Min\u021bile la Corpuri? Dac\u0103 Min\u021bile<\/strong> controleaz\u0103 cu adev\u0103rat Corpurile<\/strong> (cum se pare c\u0103 fac), cum se explic\u0103? R\u0103spunsul este Transformarea Fourier<\/strong> care permite func\u021biilor matematice dintr-un Domeniu de Frecven\u021b\u0103<\/strong> \u00een afara Spa\u021biului \u0219i Timpului (un domeniu mental<\/strong>) s\u0103 fie reprezentate ca func\u021bii materiale \u00een spa\u021biu \u0219i timp (un domeniu fizic<\/strong>).
\nMaterialismul \u015etiin\u021bific<\/strong> nu poate ajunge la aceast\u0103 concluzie matematic\u0103 simpl\u0103, deoarece neag\u0103 existen\u021ba unui domeniu mental neobservabil,<\/strong> f\u0103r\u0103 dimensiuni, \u00een afara spa\u021biului \u0219i timpului.
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span>Transformarea Fourier<\/strong> st\u0103 la baza Mecanicii Cuantice<\/strong> \u0219i Holografiei.<\/strong> Mai mult sau mai pu\u021bin, toate problemele \u0219tiin\u021bei ar disp\u0103rea dac\u0103 oamenii de \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 ar accepta realitatea ontologic\u0103 a Transform\u0103rilor Fourier care une\u0219te dou\u0103 Domenii Matematice: unul \u00een spa\u021biu \u0219i timp (Materie – Corp<\/strong>) \u0219i altul \u00een afara spa\u021biului \u0219i timpului (Mintea<\/strong>).
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Transformarea Fourier<\/strong> este exemplul arhetipal al locului \u00een care matematica se ciocne\u0219te cu metoda experimental\u0103 a \u0219tiin\u021bei, care \u015etiin\u021b\u0103 alege s\u0103 sus\u021bin\u0103 Experimentele<\/strong> \u00een locul Matematicii.<\/strong> Dac\u0103 ar inversa aceast\u0103 politic\u0103, \u0219tiin\u021ba ar deveni matematic\u0103 \u0219i toate absurdit\u0103\u021bile Empirismului<\/strong> ar fi dep\u0103\u0219ite.
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>\u0218tiin\u021ba<\/strong> este \u00eengrozit\u0103 de faptul c\u0103 Realitatea<\/strong> este \u00eemp\u0103r\u021bit\u0103 \u00een dou\u0103 categorii radical diferite (mintea neobservabil\u0103 \u0219i materia observabil\u0103), deoarece metoda \u0219tiin\u021bific\u0103 se adreseaz\u0103 numai uneia dintre ele (materie observabil\u0103). Totu\u0219i, Transformarea Fourier<\/strong> este un instrument matematic fundamental care demonstreaz\u0103 c\u0103 nu pute\u021bi avea o Realitate care nu se \u00eemparte \u00een dou\u0103 domenii inter-conexe, transformabile.
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>\u0218tiin\u021ba nu a reu\u0219it niciodat\u0103 s\u0103 \u00een\u021beleag\u0103 ce \u00eenseamn\u0103 cu adev\u0103rat Transformarea Fourier. Dac\u0103 s-ar \u00eent\u00e2mpla, ar vedea c\u0103 nu are alt\u0103 posibilitate dec\u00e2t s\u0103 accepte Ontologia Dualist\u0103<\/strong> (de fapt Monismul<\/strong> cu dublu aspect) asociat\u0103 cu Transformarea Fourier – un domeniu observabil (al materiei) \u0219i un domeniu neobservabil (mintea), care d\u0103 na\u0219tere acesteia (materia).
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>\u0218tiin\u021ba<\/strong> spune c\u0103 nu exist\u0103 Min\u021bi<\/strong>, ci doar Materie<\/strong>, care d\u0103 na\u0219tere la Minte. Leibniz<\/strong> a spus c\u0103 exist\u0103 infinite min\u021bi matematice<\/strong> care dau na\u0219tere la fenomenul materiei<\/strong>. El ar fi invocat Transformarea Fourier pentru a-\u0219i explica sistemul, dac\u0103 ar fi fost cunoscut \u00een zilele lui. Pentru Leibniz,<\/strong> nu exist\u0103 Substan\u021be Materiale<\/strong>, doar Fenomene Materiale<\/strong> care deriv\u0103 din Min\u0163ile Matematice<\/strong> (adev\u0103ratele Substan\u021be ale Existen\u021bei<\/strong>).<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Adev\u0103rul<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201eFiin\u021bele umane, prin schimbarea Atitudinilor Interioare ale Min\u021bii lor, pot schimba Aspectele Exterioare ale vie\u021bii lor” – William James<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Lucrul pe care trebuie s\u0103-l schimba\u021bi<\/strong> mai presus de toate este atitudinea voastr\u0103 fa\u021b\u0103 de Adev\u0103r.<\/strong> Trebuie s\u0103 v\u0103 \u00eentreba\u021bi ce fel de caracter trebuie s\u0103 aib\u0103 Adev\u0103rul \u0219i cum putem avea acces la el. Avem oare acces la Adev\u0103rul etern prin Sentimentele, Sim\u021burile, Intui\u021biile<\/strong> noastre, sau prin Ra\u021biunea<\/strong> noastr\u0103? Dac\u0103 Adev\u0103rul nu<\/strong> se refer\u0103 la Sentimente<\/strong>, este inutil s\u0103 v\u0103 aduce\u021bi Sentimentele la c\u0103utarea Adev\u0103rului. Acela\u0219i lucru este valabil \u0219i pentru Sim\u021buri.
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span>Este Adev\u0103rul \u00een \u201eCon\u0219tien\u021ba Golit\u0103”<\/strong> (prin Medita\u0163ie<\/strong> \u00een religiile orientale<\/strong>)? Ce inseamn\u0103 asta? \u201eCon\u0219tien\u0163a Golit\u0103” se refer\u0103 la o stare ipotetic\u0103, empiric\u0103 a Min\u021bii<\/strong>. Are o leg\u0103tur\u0103 exact Zero<\/strong> cu Adev\u0103rul etern, necesar, cognoscibil \u0219i inteligibil.
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span>C\u00e2nd \u00eel caut\u0103, oamenii caut\u0103 de regul\u0103 altceva dec\u00e2t Adev\u0103rul.<\/strong> Ei vor ca lucrurile s\u0103 le hr\u0103neasc\u0103 Sim\u021burile, Sentimentele \u0219i Intui\u021biile<\/strong> \u0219i nu au dec\u00e2t dispre\u021b pentru Ra\u021biune<\/strong> (Martin Luther – \u201eRa\u0163iunea e o curv\u0103 a Diavolului\u201d<\/strong><\/span>). Cu toate acestea, numai Ra\u0163iunea<\/strong> este despre Adev\u0103rul<\/strong> etern, necesar. 1 + 1 = 2<\/strong> este cea mai Adev\u0103rat\u0103 declara\u021bie pe care a\u021bi f\u0103cut-o vreodat\u0103. Este Adev\u0103rat dintotdeauna, chiar \u015fi dinainte de apari\u0163ia Omului \u00een Univers<\/strong>, spre deosebire de toate Sentimentele, Senza\u021biile, Ipotezele, Credin\u021bele, Opiniile, Experien\u021bele, Interpret\u0103rile \u0219i Intui\u021biile Mistice.<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201eNu putem niciodat\u0103 s\u0103 \u0219tim totul. … Nu po\u021bi ajunge p\u00e2n\u0103 la sf\u00e2r\u0219itul\u00a0<\/span><\/span>\u00cen\u021belegerii, dar pute\u021bi \u00een\u021belege \u00eentotdeauna mai mult. “- Tara Shears<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Din contr\u0103, cu siguran\u021b\u0103 putem cunoa\u0219te toate lucrurile \u0219i \u00een\u021belege totul… Matematic<\/strong>.
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span>Numai Matematica<\/strong> poate fi \u00een\u021beleas\u0103 pe deplin \u0219i definitiv \u0219i, dac\u0103 Realitatea<\/strong> este\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span>matematic\u0103 (a\u0219a cum este \u0219i cum trebuie s\u0103 fie), atunci Realitatea<\/strong> \u00eens\u0103\u0219i poate fi \u00een\u021beleas\u0103 pe deplin \u0219i definitiv.\u201d<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n


\n\"\"<\/a>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Cuvinte \u0219i Numere \u201eAdev\u0103rul refuz\u0103 cuvintele create de om pentru a-l descrie. Rezultatul Cuvintelor este Mytos… Credin\u021b\u0103, Opinie, Interpretare… concepte omene\u0219ti ale Realit\u0103\u021bii. Antidotul este Logos. Dac\u0103 Mythos este Cuv\u00e2ntul, Logosul este Numarul. Ne apropiem cu at\u00e2t mai mult de Adev\u0103r, cu at\u00e2t mai mult cu c\u00e2t folosim Numerele Ontologice pentru a-l descrie. Singularit\u0103\u021bile zero […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1593],"tags":[1393,1747,1785,2106,2226,2004,1749,1748,2372,2027,2370,2371,1377,2110,2228],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4741"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4741"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4741\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4745,"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4741\/revisions\/4745"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4741"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4741"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4741"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}