{"id":5182,"date":"2019-01-18T10:27:24","date_gmt":"2019-01-18T09:27:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/?p=5182"},"modified":"2019-01-18T10:28:48","modified_gmt":"2019-01-18T09:28:48","slug":"hiperienii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/?p=5182","title":{"rendered":"HIPERIENII"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Secrets Of The Greenwood \u00b7<\/p>\n

\u201eDeci, cum au \u00eenceput s\u0103 \u00een\u021beleag\u0103 universul, primii hiperieni? Cum au \u00eenceput s\u0103-l descifreze? Ini\u021bial, a fost constatarea c\u0103 a existat un conflict \u00eentre ceea ce era Observat de Sim\u021buri cu ceea ce putea fi Conceput de Minte. C\u00e2nd Observ\u0103m lumea din jurul nostru, totul pare a fi Finit. Corpurile noastre sunt obiecte finite. \u021aara \u00een care tr\u0103im este limitat\u0103 de mare. P\u0103m\u00e2ntul \u00eensu\u0219i este limitat de spa\u021biu. Totul pare s\u0103 aib\u0103 o limit\u0103, o margine la care ceva se termin\u0103 \u0219i altceva \u00eencepe. Cu toate acestea, imagina\u021bi-v\u0103 succesiunea Numerelor \u00een Mintea dvs., pornind de la Zero. C\u00e2t de departe ai putea s\u0103 te duci? Ai ajunge vreodat\u0103 la o limit\u0103? Se pare c\u0103, indiferent c\u00e2t de mare Num\u0103r atinge\u021bi, pute\u021bi oric\u00e2nd s\u0103 ad\u0103uga\u021bi altul \u0219i s\u0103 continua\u021bi. Astfel, este posibil s\u0103 concepem Infinitul \u00een Mintea noastr\u0103. Dac\u0103 totul \u00een jurul nostru este Finit, cum este posibil s\u0103 concepem Infinitul?<\/p>\n

S\u0103 presupunem c\u0103 dorim s\u0103 determin\u0103m dac\u0103 universul este finit sau infinit. Trebuie s\u0103 ne baz\u0103m pe Percep\u021biile noastre despre Finit? Sau ar trebui s\u0103 ne folosim de concep\u021bia noastr\u0103 despre infinit? Dac\u0103 ne baz\u0103m pe Percep\u021bie, la Observa\u021bie, nu vom r\u0103spunde niciodat\u0103 la \u00eentrebare. Pentru a determina prin Observa\u021bie dac\u0103 Universul este sau nu finit, ar trebui s\u0103 observ\u0103m o limit\u0103 la marginea universului. Pentru c\u0103 toate lucrurile finite sunt limitate. Dac\u0103 nu se observ\u0103 nicio limit\u0103, acest lucru nu dovede\u0219te c\u0103 universul este infinit, pentru c\u0103 putem spune \u00eentotdeauna c\u0103 nu am observat suficient de departe, grani\u021ba, dac\u0103 este acolo, ar putea fi mai departe dec\u00e2t am observat \u00een prezent. Astfel, Observarea ar putea continua pe o perioad\u0103 nedeterminat\u0103, iar lipsa de Observare a unei limite nu ar fi niciodat\u0103 o dovad\u0103 a inexisten\u021bei ei.<\/p>\n

Cu toate acestea, exist\u0103 \u0219i alte metode de Cunoa\u015ftere, care nu necesit\u0103 Observarea. G\u00e2ndi\u021bi-v\u0103 la definirea termenului \u201dFinit” pe care am afirmat-o, precum c\u0103 un lucru Finit trebuie s\u0103 aib\u0103 o Limit\u0103. Ce este o limit\u0103? Este ceva care separ\u0103 un lucru de altul, punctul \u00een care un lucru se termin\u0103 \u0219i altul \u00eencepe. Deci, f\u0103r\u0103 a face nicio Observare, putem stabili dac\u0103 universul are sau nu o limit\u0103? Dac\u0103 o limit\u0103 separ\u0103 un lucru de altul, atunci grani\u021ba universului ar trebui s\u0103 fac\u0103 acela\u0219i lucru.Dar acum trebuie s\u0103 definim ceea ce \u00een\u021belegem prin “univers”. Prin “univers” \u00een\u021belegem literalmente tot ceea ce exist\u0103. Nimic nu poate exista f\u0103r\u0103 a fi parte a universului. Prin urmare, dac\u0103 universul avea o limit\u0103, de ce ar fi fost separat universul? Ce ar fi de partea cealalt\u0103 a grani\u021bei? Conform defini\u021biei “universului”, nimic nu poate exista dincolo de o astfel de limit\u0103. Dac\u0103 nu exist\u0103 nimic pe cealalt\u0103 parte a grani\u021bei, atunci nu este o limit\u0103 deloc, a\u0219a cum am definit o limit\u0103 ca fiind cea care separ\u0103 un lucru de altul, ambele fiind lucruri care exist\u0103.<\/p>\n

Prin urmare, universul pur \u0219i simplu nu poate avea o limit\u0103 \u0219i prin urmare, trebuie s\u0103 fie Infinit. Am r\u0103spuns la \u00eentrebare f\u0103r\u0103 a fi nevoie de Observare. Am Dedus pur \u0219i simplu r\u0103spunsul din defini\u021biile termenilor implica\u021bi. Acest proces este cunoscut ca Ra\u021bionalism \u0219i se opune Empirismului, Metodei De Observare. Este procesul de Ra\u021bionalism pe care trebuie s\u0103-l folosim pentru a descoperi Sistemul Realit\u0103\u021bii \u00een noi. Observ\u0103rile pot fi utile, dar niciodat\u0103 nu vor dovedi nimic. Numai Ra\u021bionalismul poate, \u0219i Ra\u021bionalismul a \u00eenceput s\u0103 fie folosit de Hiperieni c\u00e2nd au \u00eenceput s\u0103 descopere Sistemul Realit\u0103\u021bii.<\/p>\n

Povestea \u00eencepe \u00een Grecia antic\u0103 cu na\u0219terea Filosofiei. G\u00e2nditorii greci au \u00eenceput marele efort intelectual pentru a explica universul. Cei mai vechi filozofi au realizat c\u0103 nu se poate explica niciodat\u0103 universul dac\u0103 nu se poate defini substan\u021ba din care a fost f\u0103cut universul. Aceast\u0103 substan\u021b\u0103 era cunoscut\u0103 sub numele de “arche”, iar definirea archei era central\u0103 pentru filozofia acestor g\u00e2nditori timpurii.<\/p>\n

Primul filosof a fost Thales \u0219i el a spus c\u0103 APA este arca, substan\u021ba de la care deriv\u0103 totul \u00een univers. Aceasta a fost o idee interesant\u0103, dar elevul s\u0103u Anaximander a v\u0103zut un defect \u00een aceast\u0103 teorie. Anaximander \u0219tia c\u0103 arca trebuie s\u0103 fie sursa a tot ceea ce exist\u0103 \u00een univers. Dac\u0103 arca ar fi fost apa, atunci apa trebuie s\u0103 con\u021bin\u0103 toate atributele pe care le vedem \u00een alte substan\u021be din univers. Apa poate fi fierbinte sau rece, poate fi nemi\u015fcat\u0103 sau \u00een mi\u0219care, totu\u0219i, a constatat Anaximander, ea ar putea fi numai umed\u0103, niciodat\u0103 uscat\u0103. Dac\u0103 usc\u0103ciunea nu este prezent\u0103 \u00een ap\u0103, atunci de unde provine ea? Usc\u0103ciunea trebuie s\u0103 provin\u0103 de undeva, prin urmare apa nu ar putea fi arca.<\/p>\n

\u00cen schimb, Anaximander a venit cu un candidat mult mai ra\u021bional pentru arche. Mai degrab\u0103 dec\u00e2t apa sau orice alt\u0103 substan\u021b\u0103 Observabil\u0103, Anaximander a sugerat c\u0103 arche trebuie s\u0103 fie o Substan\u021b\u0103 Pur Ra\u021bional\u0103, care con\u021bine toate elementele \u0219i atributele pe care le vedem \u00een lume. Trebuie s\u0103 fie o Substan\u021b\u0103 Infinit\u0103. Anaximander a numit aceast\u0103 substan\u021b\u0103 “apeiron”, ceea ce \u00eenseamn\u0103 “infinit”.<\/p>\n

Apeiron este o Substan\u021b\u0103 Non-Fizic\u0103, Pur Ra\u021bional\u0103, o Energie Pur\u0103 \u00een Mi\u0219care Permanent\u0103, aceast\u0103 mi\u0219care d\u00e2nd na\u0219tere la toate lucrurile din univers. \u00cen\u021belegerea lui Apeiron, \u00een\u021belegerea iInfinit\u0103\u021bii, este una din cheile \u00een\u021belegerii Hiperianismului.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

The Illuminated Pleb<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

23 ore<\/span><\/abbr><\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0\u00b7\u00a0<\/span><\/i><\/div>\n
\n

Raymond Susilo shared a post.
\n6 mins \u00b7<\/p>\n

Secrets Of The Greenwood
\n19 mins \u00b7
\nSo how did they go about beginning to understand the universe, the first Hyperians? How did they begin to piece it all together? Initially, it was the realization that there was conflict between what was being observed by the senses with what was conceivable by the mind.<\/p>\n

When we observe the world around us, everything seems to be finite. Our bodies are finite objects. The land we live on is bounded by the sea. The earth itself is bounded by space. Everything seems to have a boundary, an edge at which point that object ends and another begins. However, imagine counting numbers in your mind, starting from zero. How far could you go? Would you ever reach a boundary? It seems that, no matter how large a number you reach, you can always add one and keep going. Thus, it is possible to conceive infinity in our mind. If everything around us is finite, how is it possible to conceive infinity at all?<\/p>\n

Supposing we wish to determine whether the universe is finite or infinite. Should we rely on our perceptions of finity? Or should we make use of our conception of infinity? If we rely on perception, on observation, we will never answer the question. For to determine via observation whether or not the universe it finite, we would have to observe a boundary at the edge of the universe. For all finite things are bounded. If no boundary is observed, this does not prove that the universe is infinite, because we can always say that we have not observed far enough, the boundary, if it is there, could be further away than we have currently observed. Thus, observation could continue indefinitely, and the lack of observation of a boundary would never constitute proof of its non-existence.<\/p>\n

However, there are other methods of determining knowledge, ones which require no observations at all. Think of the definition of \u2018finity\u2019 that we have stated, that a finite thing must have a boundary. What is a boundary? It is something which separates one thing from another, the point where one thing ends and another begins. So, without performing any observations, can we determine whether or not the universe has a boundary? If a boundary separates one thing from another, then the universe\u2019s boundary would have to do the same.<\/p>\n

But now we have to define what we mean by \u2018universe\u2019. By \u2018universe\u2019 we mean literally everything that exists. Nothing can exist without being part of the universe. Therefore, if the universe had a boundary, what would it be separating the universe from? What would be on the other side of the boundary? As per the definition of \u2018universe,\u2019 nothing could exist beyond such a boundary. If there is nothing on the other side of the boundary, then it is not a boundary at all, as we defined a boundary as that which separates one thing from another, with both of these things being things which exist.<\/p>\n

Therefore, the universe simply cannot have a boundary, and therefore must be infinite. We have answered the question without any need of observations. We simply deduced the answer from definitions of the terms involved. This process is known as rationalism and is opposed by empiricism, the method of observations. It is this process of rationalism which we must use to discover the system of reality within us. Observations can be useful, but they will never prove anything. Only rationalism can, and it was rationalism that Hyperians began using when they began to discover the system of reality.<\/p>\n

The story begins in Ancient Greece with the birth of Philosophy. Greek thinkers began the great intellectual quest to explain the universe. The earliest philosophers realized that one could never explain the universe unless one could define the substance from which the universe was made. This substance was known as the \u2018arche\u2019 and defining the arche was central to the philosophy of these early thinkers.<\/p>\n

The first philosopher was Thales and he said that water was the arche, the substance from which everything else in the universe derived. This was an interesting idea, yet his pupil Anaximander saw a flaw in this theory. Anaximander knew that the arche must be the source of everything else in the universe. If the arche was water, then water must contain all the attributes that we see in other substances in the universe. Water can be hot or cold, can be still or in motion, yet, Anaximander realized, it could only ever be wet, never dry. If dryness in not present in water, then where does dryness come from? Dryness must come from somewhere, therefore, water could not be the arche.<\/p>\n

Instead, Anaximander came up with a far more rational candidate for the arche. Rather than water, or any other observable substance, Anaximander suggested that the arche must be a purely rational substance, one which contains all elements and attributes which we see in the world. It must be an infinite substance. Anaximander called this substance \u2018apeiron\u2019 which means \u2018infinite\u2019.<\/p>\n

Apeiron is a non-physical, purely rational substance, pure energy in constant motion, this motion giving rise to all things in the universe. Understanding Apeiron, understanding infinity, is one of the keys to understanding Hyperianism.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Secrets Of The Greenwood \u00b7 \u201eDeci, cum au \u00eenceput s\u0103 \u00een\u021beleag\u0103 universul, primii hiperieni? Cum au \u00eenceput s\u0103-l descifreze? Ini\u021bial, a fost constatarea c\u0103 a existat un conflict \u00eentre ceea ce era Observat de Sim\u021buri cu ceea ce putea fi Conceput de Minte. C\u00e2nd Observ\u0103m lumea din jurul nostru, totul pare a fi Finit. Corpurile […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1593],"tags":[2763,1010,1399,2760,2759,2758,1829,2761,1599,2762,799,1827],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5182"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5182"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5182\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5185,"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5182\/revisions\/5185"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5182"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5182"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bassdu.mine.bz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5182"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}