Dacia Iluministă

The Illuminati’s religion is the most highly developed expression of Gnosticism and is called Illumination (alternatively, Illuminism). Dedicated to the pursuit of enlightenment, it has many parallels with the Eastern religions of Hinduism, Buddhism and Taoism. It rejects the Abrahamic religions of faith: Judaism, Christianity and Islam, considering these the work of the “Demiurge”; an inferior, cruel and wicked deity who deludes himself that he is the True God, and who has inflicted endless horrors on humanity.

If you wish to judge for yourself how deranged the Demiurge is, you need only read the Old Testament, the story of the Demiurge’s involvement with his “Chosen People”, the Hebrews. You may wonder why the “God of All” entered into an exclusive and partisan Covenant with a tribe in the Middle East several thousand years ago, why he promised them a land (Canaan) that belonged to others, and why he then actively participated with them in a genocidal war against the Canaanites. Even more bizarrely, according to Christian theology, he then dispatched all of those Hebrews, whom he had supported so fanatically, to Limbo – the edge of Hell – when they died. They couldn’t go to Heaven because they were indelibly marked by the “Original Sin” of Adam and Eve. Only the atonement provided by the agonising death of God’s “son”, Jesus Christ, could wipe the slate clean and allow the Hebrews to be released from Limbo. But there was a catch. Only those who accepted Jesus Christ as their Lord and Saviour were eligible for Paradise.

Of course, the Chosen People of “God” have almost entirely rejected Jesus Christ. Therefore, from the Christian perspective, nearly all of the Chosen People are now in hell proper. Don’t you find God’s behaviour distinctly odd? Indeed, unbelievable? Don’t alarm bells start ringing? Doesn’t the behaviour of this God sound rather more like what would be expected of Satan?

Remember that this same “God” ordered Abraham to perform human sacrifice on his own son, Isaac. Abraham, rather than rejecting this monstrous command, rather than denouncing the creature that gave it as evil incarnate, agreed to butcher his own flesh and blood to demonstrate how slavishly and mindlessly obedient he was – the prototype of all psychopathic, fanatical “believers”.

Does God’s command to Abraham sound like something that would ever pass the lips of the True God? We pity you if you think it does because you are surely a creature of the Demiurge and one of the legions of the damned. If, however, you doubt the credentials of the Abrahamic God, you may be receptive to the message of the Illuminati and our future-oriented, rational, scientific, mathematical and dialectical religion of light – Illumination.
__________

Quotations:

“We, however, want to become those who we are – the new, the unique, the incomparable, those who impose on themselves their own law, those who create themselves!” –Nietzsche

“We new, nameless, ill-understood, we premature-born of a yet undemonstrated future, we need for a new goal and also a new means, namely a new health, a stronger, shrewder, tougher, more cheerful health than any has been hitherto.” –Nietzsche

“When man lives under oppressive government, he is fallen, his worth is gone, and his nature tarnished.” –Adam Weishaupt
__________

Rebooting the World:

When your computer goes haywire, you reboot it. What happens when the world goes haywire? Where’s the reboot button?

Isn’t that a fundamental question? Isn’t it possible to return everything to its pristine condition? Isn’t there a mechanism for restoring the Garden of Eden, for bringing back the Golden Age of Saturn? If we can’t reset the world, doesn’t it point to a fundamental design flaw? If a natural reboot button doesn’t exist, can’t we create one using our human reason? How would we put right all of the mistakes of the past, the myriad errors committed by those who preceded us? Even now, most people are mired in the darkness of superstition and mad beliefs.

Democracy has a reboot button of sorts. It’s called an election. A bad government can be voted out and a new one voted in to start the system afresh. The trouble is the new gang looks exactly like the old. Nothing changes. The power behind the throne is still there. The puppet-masters hidden by the curtain are the same as before. The democratic reboot button pretends to work, but doesn’t. It’s part of the great democratic illusion.

Evangelical Protestantism can’t be reset because it says that the Bible is the perfect, immutable and eternal word of God. Islam says the same thing about the Koran, and Judaism about the Torah. The Pope theoretically has the power to reboot Catholicism but since Catholicism claims that it represents eternal truth, it would be absurd if the Pope suddenly did the biggest U-turn in history. Therefore, theocratic regimes have no possibility of a reboot button. Mistakes cannot be corrected.

Dictatorships have no reboot button either because the dictator can’t afford to admit he’s wrong. Only the dictator’s death permits a regime reboot. Soviet communism had no reboot button because, being totalitarian, it was locked into an ideology that couldn’t acknowledge error.

Capitalism has no reboot button. Those families with capital remain the same generation after generation. A lucky few are admitted to the charmed circle of top capitalists and an unlucky few disappear because they died without heirs or committed some crime that couldn’t be swept under the carpet, or gambled it all away or spent everything on living the high life – but those are rarities.

The Old World Order – the elite, dynastic families that have always ruled the world – have no desire for any reboot button for the simple and obvious reason that it would end their reign. Every top dog wants to bury the reboot button permanently. That’s one bone they don’t want anyone to dig up.

Most individuals have no reboot button. Once their identity is set, they almost never change their beliefs or ways of doing things. How many Orthodox Jews, Christian Fundamentalists or Muslims are capable of rebooting their beliefs? They are totally brainwashed and the purpose of brainwashing is to exclude the possibility of other choices.

Societies, institutions, companies, banks, religions, political systems…none of them have reboot buttons. Violent revolution, bankruptcy and collapse are the only ways to reboot things that are failing disastrously. Hardly rational and efficient, wouldn’t you agree? It needn’t be like this.

We can and must create a system that allows new generations to be released from the mistakes made by our ancestors. We can rocket-boost human evolution towards divinity if we know how to free the collective human mind of the junk and nonsense that has accumulated since the dawn of time.
__________

Starting Over:

A computer would be unusable after a while if you couldn’t reboot it. The memory gets clogged, processes starts interfering with each other, rogue subroutines start hijacking all of the CPU. Everything grinds to a halt as inescapable infinite loops are generated. A blue screen crash is on its way.

The same breakdown process is true of almost anything. Death is a human blue screen crash. And reincarnation can be described as the ultimate reboot button – you get a whole new life and can start again. The ways in which humanity can be rebooted are actually extraordinarily simple in principle yet extraordinarily difficult to implement. There are only three issues that need to be addressed:

Wealth. If the rich keep getting richer, they become ever more powerful and influential, eventually establishing an untouchable privileged elite that takes active steps to maintain its position indefinitely. Above all, the members of the elite ensure that their wealth can never be rebooted because that would mean the end of their power.

A government that implemented a 100% inheritance tax i.e. that prevented a single penny from being passed on by any rich people to their heirs would, in that one law, have rebooted the wealth of the world, and ensured that it kept being rebooted generation after generation. With this law in place, it would be impossible for dynastic families of extreme wealth and power – such as the Rothschilds – to exist. Their power would be instantly dissolved. The current Rothschilds would be the last to the trouble the world with their super greed.

The vast majority of people in the world have no significant assets to pass on. A tiny number of families have an enormous amount of assets to transmit from one generation to the next. Why should the overwhelming majority be agreeable to this? If you want to help your children and your children’s children, the best thing you can do for them is to make sure that they are not the losers in a rigged system where the privileged are the guaranteed winners.

Who in their right mind wouldn’t support the “Wealth Reboot Tax”? This tax, by itself, would destroy the Old World Order. It’s that simple. Freedom from the elite is just one tax away. Of course, they know that better than anyone. They have had to wage the greatest psychological war in history to prevent the people imposing such a tax on them. Billions of poor and badly educated people have been mind controlled into thinking that there’s nothing wrong with the rich getting richer. That it’s good, it’s healthy, it’s morally right, that disaster would befall us if we taxed the super rich out of existence.

The “American Dream” encourages the suckers and losers to delude themselves that they too might be super rich one day, though the odds against it are simply astronomical. Well, time to get real. If you want fairness, justice, an end to privilege and to the ruling elite, there’s only one way to do it: reboot each person’s wealth when they die. Rather than being passed on to private individuals, a dead person’s assets should automatically be transferred to the Commonwealth – which is the wealth of all rather than the wealth of the chosen few.

What do the Old World Order most fear? – removal of their money and their dynastic privileges. That’s what 100% inheritance tax accomplishes, hence is the silver bullet, the holy water, the stake through the heart to destroy these undead, blood-sucking vampires. 100% inheritance tax is the legal and economic enforcement of equal opportunities.
__________

Children:

Children are deliberately brainwashed by both their parents and their governments. Brainwashing is the mechanism that allows the virus of the old religions to be transmitted from one generation to the next and that allows the values of the elite to be permanently embedded in society.

You can reboot the world by ensuring that no such brainwashing is ever allowed to take place. All children should be protected by law from any attempt to brainwash them. Children should be taught as many different religions as possible, as well as atheism, agnosticism and skepticism, and all of these should be taught critically rather than “respectfully” i.e. their faults, flaws and illogicalities should be ruthlessly exposed and even ridiculed. Truth and reason should not defer to crazy beliefs just because they’re old and entrenched in society.

Children should be taught about different political and economic systems, again critically, with none being promoted as the “right and proper” systems as has been traditionally done with capitalism and democracy. It’s up to everyone to make up their own mind based on the evidence, rational argument and the quality and rigour of theory. Who could possibly object to that? – apart from fanatics frothing at the mouth. And aren’t they exactly the people we should be protecting impressionable minds from?

Anyone who thinks they have a convincing argument should have no fear of letting it take its chances amongst all of the other competing ideas. The type of people who want to genitally mutilate babies to ensure that they get their “brand” on them as early as possible have no place in any civilised society. Circumcision should be illegal in modern nations. It’s a barbaric, superstitious practice that stands as a fundamental attack on human rights.

The sort of people who want to psychologically terrify children with stories of eternal hellfire can’t be allowed to spread their poison unchallenged. The sort of people who proclaim that “greed is good” and “profit is God” can’t be given a free run.

The No-Brainwashing (Mental Reboot) Law is all that’s needed to reboot the collective Mind of humanity. Children will be released from the poisonous ideas of the past. Who can doubt that Abrahamism and capitalism will perish in one generation if children are given a free choice? If humanity isn’t irredeemably irrational then it will take the rational decisions that set it on a whole new path. Isn’t it time the human race put its mistakes and its childish past behind it?

Isn’t it time it consigned superstition and prejudice to oblivion? We are free. We are not obliged to believe what our parents believe. Should we believe in a flat earth or that the sun orbits the earth just because these were once popular beliefs? Abrahamic religions were prepared to burn people to death for asserting that it was in fact the earth that orbited the sun. Creationism, in the present day, rejects Darwinian evolution in every regard. Abrahamism is anti-science and is nothing more than ancient superstition enforced by the greatest and most violent brainwashing programme in human history. It has no place in modernity.
__________

The Dialectic:

The dialectical process involves a thesis and an opposing antithesis, followed by a harmonising synthesis, which then becomes a new higher thesis which is opposed by a more sophisticated antithesis, which gives rise to a higher synthesis and so on in a continual, progressive rebooting mechanism, allowing a superior starting boot each time round the dialectical loop.

In Freud’s tripartite model of the human psyche involving the id, the ego and the superego, we see the rudiments of a dialectical system. The id, obsessed with its own pleasure and selfish drives, demands instant gratification of any of its desires, no matter how socially unacceptable. If we call this the thesis then it is opposed by the antithesis of the superego, which is concerned with morality, community, altruism, conscience, the rules of society, parental prohibitions etc. The ego, the pragmatic, rational agent that obeys the reality principle provides a synthesis of the conflicting demands of the id and superego.

In childhood and early adulthood, the ego may not be too good at its job, but as life experience and knowledge grow, it gets dialectically better and better. Unfortunately, in the West, we live in an immature, impulsive, pleasure-seeking society devoted to instant gratification, so the ego is much more attuned to the id rather than offering a proper balance between id and superego. If we could build into society healthy, functioning dialectical institutions, we could transform the world.

Every religion, company, bank, institution, school, university etc should be explicitly modelled on the dialectical human psyche i.e. there should be a highly energetic, passionate and selfish id component counterbalanced by an equally energetic and passionate component advocating altruism, morality, social responsibility, regulation, avoidance of unnecessary risk etc. Finally, there should be a rational, synthesis component which takes cognisance of the counter-claims of the thesis and antithesis and carries out the most rational strategy in the prevailing circumstances.

If we look at the recent financial crisis, there was a complete failure of the regulatory superego component. The id component (the hyper greedy and selfish banking system) was allowed to go berserk with self-indulgence, instant gratification and utter contempt for society as a whole. There was no ego component sufficiently mature to rein back the id and apply reason and pragmatism. The disastrous outcome was therefore both predictable and inevitable and any fool on earth should have seen it coming.

We live in the most infantile, stupid type of society, entirely geared to the unrestrained impulses of the id leading to endless cycles of boom (hyper-greed) and bust (hyper-fear). It needn’t be like this. We need a Dialectical Reboot Law that makes it compulsory for all aspects of society to be fully regulated by a superego component to curb id excesses, and with a rational ego component to reach a compromise between a particular institution and its regulator.

The West has just a few feeble, ineffectual, impotent regulators that are there for little more than appearances’ sake. The financial crisis fully exposed their incompetence. Regulators – Devil’s Advocates, so to speak – must be embedded in society and given real, meaningful powers, and be full of talented, strong-minded people. Above all, we need an entirely new component of society representing the synthesis phase of the dialectic. This function – Arbitration – decides what is permissible in any dispute between an institution and its regulator. In this way, the dialectic would become ingrained in everything we do, with the promise that it will lead us to higher and higher states of prosperity, progress and fulfilment. The American political system was designed on the basis of the “separation of powers” and “checks and balances”. Unfortunately, it didn’t go nearly far enough. The whole of society, not just politics, needs to be handled this way.

The Americans failed to realise that if there was an extremely powerful body outside the political process that could directly influence the political process then the separation of powers and the checks and balances were rendered irrelevant. The external body we are referring to is the banking system and corporate lobbying. These were able to use their financial muscle to buy the political process and make it do its bidding.

The great Illuminatus Thomas Jefferson was one person acutely aware of the danger. He said, “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.” Was he wrong? Although the banks don’t explicitly control the issue of currency (that’s left to the Federal Reserve via the U.S. Treasury that actually prints the banknotes), they do so implicitly through their massive lobbying power that secures any outcome they desire in terms of the currency. The Federal Reserve is their poodle. Tragically, Jefferson’s wisdom was ignored.

All American politicians are in the pockets of bankers and corporations. Their political job is to promote Zionist, Masonic, corporate and banking interests – and to hell with the people, that bunch of suckers who have allowed their political system to be hijacked and prostituted. The harsh reality is that America’s elected representatives, the ones accountable to the people, are not running American politics. Rather, it is run by private men behind the curtain, unelected and unaccountable, and excessively rich, powerful and ruthless.

If you want a healthy political system you cannot under any circumstances have a private power above politics, but that’s exactly what you get if you allow the banks that control the economy to be run by private individuals. It would be insane to replace the American military with a private army commanded by private generals who could declare war on nations on their own account, regardless of the wishes of the people. So why is the banking system, the lifeblood of the economy, in private hands, able to do whatever it likes regardless of the wishes and interests of the people? The financial crisis was caused by bankers who had no investment at all in social responsibility and who wallowed in moral hazard – taking absurd risks with other people’s money for which they would suffer no penalty if anything went wrong but gain massive profits for themselves if things went right. It’s mad to allow banks to be in private hands. When it comes to privately controlled banking, cui bono? – the Old World Order, the Zionists and Masons, of course. Their great insight was that democracy – the so-called power of the people – didn’t amount to a hill of beans so long as they controlled the money, hence could buy and manipulate the politicians. Therefore, they became enthusiastic cheerleaders for democracy.

A private banking system is intrinsically anti-democratic and contrary to the interests of the people and to a healthy economy run for the benefit of the people.

So, there you have it – the three laws that can reboot the world:

The Wealth Reboot Law
The No-Brainwashing (Mental Reboot) Law
The Dialectical Reboot Law

These are the laws of reason and only the irrational will oppose them, or those who have a vested interested in the world staying exactly as it is – fucked for everyone other than them.

This is the formula for destroying the Old World Order and building a New World Order in which the people are free at last. We are just three laws from liberty. Isn’t it time we implemented these laws? Isn’t it time for the rebirth of the world? This time we’ll put right everything that went wrong first time round.

Earth I was the Demiurge’s dark and dismal creation. Earth II will be humanity’s own creation, and will crystallise the victory of reason over irrationality, knowledge over faith and superstition, light over darkness, good over evil.
__________

The Race of Life:

Political systems are much easier to understand if they are reduced to their most fundamental elements. These are best illustrated in the context of what they imply for our chances in the race of life in which we are all engaged, like it or not.
__________

Communism:

In this approach, no one cares who wins the race because everyone is treated identically (in theory). The losers get the same rewards as the winners, hence there’s no incentive for any of the best runners to put in any effort. Everyone shuffles along, dragging their feet and yawning. There’s no glory, no hard work, no talent, no innovation, no progress. If you allow the lazy, the inept and the unimaginative to have the same rewards as the energetic, clever, meritorious and creative then you have guaranteed a lazy, inept, unprogressive society – and that’s exactly what the Soviet Union delivered. And that’s why it collapsed.
__________

Capitalism:

This race is all about how much capital you have, and that is overwhelmingly determined by how much capital your parents have given you. In the capitalist race of life, the privileged elite with capital and connections are allowed to start the race with an enormous and uncatchable head start over everyone else. Their success is certain. No one outside the elite has any realistic chance in life. The underclass actually begin behind the starting line and are sure to finish last.
__________

Democracy:

A system that ought to be about ensuring that everyone starts from the same position – has been commandeered by capitalism and is nothing but the curtain the elite draw over themselves to hide what they’re really doing. Democracy, when tied to capitalism, is not the power of the people but government of the people by the elite for the elite. Privilege, elitism, inequality, capitalism and democracy all go together. In the race of life governed by these rules, your race is over before you are even born. Your chances are dictated by how someone else fared – your parents – in the race before yours. Who in their right mind would take part in a race determined by someone else’s efforts rather than their own, a race decided before they even set foot on the track?
__________

Gangsterism:

This is the race run by gangsters and gangster regimes (such as many of those in Africa) that are explicitly based on bribery, corruption, criminality and violence. The crooks and the mobsters are sure to win. They’ll intimidate, injure and kill the other runners if necessary.
__________

Religion:

Your success in the race is dictated by how well brainwashed you are, how much you go along with the commandments, rules and regulations of the dominant religion. Heretics have no chance in this race. No one is free to run their own race. The race’s rulebook is a Bible, a Torah or a Koran, and the stewards of the race are bearded fanatics who’ll burn anyone who strays off the “right” track. If you are born under the dark star of Islam, for example, your whole life will run along train tracks of relentless prayer, memorizing the Koran, obeying every rule in the Koran, eating halal food, avoiding everything haram (forbidden), obeying the community elders. There is no possibility of being an individual capable of expressing yourself in your own way.
__________

Anarchism:

No race, no rules, no reason. A catastrophic free-for-all that, understandably, has never been tried anywhere on earth in any significant way.
__________

Meritocracy:

Everyone starts from the same position. Equal opportunity is a defining pillar of meritocracy – no one can be allowed a privileged or underprivileged starting position. The winners of the race will be strictly the most meritorious: the faster runners, hardest workers, the most imaginative, most creative, and most talented.

The only race that any rational person would participate in is one where he has the same chance as everyone else. Why would you take part in a race you can’t possibly win because it’s rigged against you? If you continue to play along once you realise the race is fixed then you’re a coward and a slave and you deserve to be treated like shit.

The only acceptable winners in the race of life, the only winners no one can complain about, are those who are undeniably the best, the hardest working and most gifted. Everyone can complain about a winner who was picked before the race even began. The Queen of the UK is the head of state for no other reason than the identity of her father, the monarch who preceded her. Not a single thing about her is relevant other than that. She is the supreme symbol of the anti-meritocratic world where your life is decided by factors that have nothing at all to do with your own efforts.

The people of the UK are a slave people, mindlessly taking part in a race where the whole thing was decided hundreds of years ago. The UK is one of the most nauseating examples of a regime of absolute privilege where elite dynastic families have maintained an iron grip over the nation.

Everyone in the world who celebrates the wedding of someone such as “Princess Diana” or the “Prince of Wales” thereby shows their contempt for meritocracy and equal opportunities. All pro-monarchists are enemies of the People.
__________

The Old World Order:

“Terrorism is war of the poor and powerless. War is terrorism of the rich and powerful.” –Peter Ustinov

Something is wrong with the world. Religions of “peace and love” spread violence and hate. Nations kill hundreds of thousands in the name of “freedom and democracy”, with the dead being labelled “collateral damage” – as if they were buildings rather than human beings. Media outlets that claim to stand for “truth and free speech” spew out nothing but lies and the propaganda of the elite. No voice is ever heard that offers any challenge to the owners of the media and the elite controllers of the world. Stock traders rig the markets to ensure a one-way bet for their insider cartels. Bankers use others’ money to enrich themselves, and if anything goes wrong they use others’ money to bail themselves out. Lawyers sell the law to the highest bidder as if it were popcorn.

Politicians, elected in the “name of the people” have nothing but contempt for the people. They are practitioners of self-service, not public service. Capitalism, the economic system of the rich elite who control the vast bulk of the capital, view human beings as nothing but consumers whose only function is to buy the objects they are selling to them.

Thus humans are transformed into zombies wandering in soulless shopping malls looking to buy “things” that they have been brainwashed into believing will make them “happy”. They themselves become “things”. The “happiness” of making a purchase is as fleeting as the usefulness of the object purchased. Obsolescence is inbuilt. In six months’ time, you will be told that the shiny, state-of-the-art object you have just bought is junk for losers and that all of the cool people have moved on to the new state-of-the-art object. And the treadmill goes on forever. Many women define “retail therapy” as the greatest pleasure in their life, their reason for being. Men worship sport and think that when multi-millionaires stride out onto a field, their own hopes and dreams are somehow embodied by these fake gladiators (who definitely WON’T be putting their lives on the line like the real gladiators).

We call this normal? We call this life? This is our definition of meaningful existence? What planet are we living on??

Who benefits from all of this? None of it has come about by accident. Someone has engineered this. Who? What if it’s all being orchestrated by a sinister global “elite” and has one simple purpose – to maintain the power, wealth, status and control of this elite in perpetuity? In other words, the world is designed by the elite to serve the interests of the elite, and has no other function. The meaning of life and the world is that the rich should keep getting richer – and FUCK everyone else! Is that not the bottom line of this world of ours, staggeringly obvious to everyone with eyes to see?

But the question is why those who do not belong to the elite should participate in this system that is so intrinsically hostile to their own interests. Why do the non-elite – the vast majority of humanity – tolerate the small number of elitists who govern them? In the past, the “masters” put physical chains on people, but things have moved on.

Now the masters’ chains are enormously more powerful even though they have no physical presence at all. The new chains are psychological and are fully accepted by those who are chained. The perfect prison is the one that is full of those who don’t realise they are in prison. The perfect prisoner is the one who puts on his own manacles and chains each day, then locks himself into his own cell. When you have turned human beings into prisoners who believe themselves free, you have achieved TOTAL control.

Dr. Carter Godwin Woodson wrote, “When you control a man’s thinking you do not have to worry about his actions. You do not have to tell him not to stand here or go yonder. He will find his ‘proper place’ and will stay in it. You do not need to send him to the back door. He will go without being told. In fact, if there is no back door, he will cut one for his special benefit. His education makes it necessary.”

The privileged elite are the ingenious gaolers. Millennia of experience have yielded them the keys to the human mind, the techniques to get people to choose slavery over freedom. The ideal slave is one who denies that he is a slave and yet acts exactly as slaves have always done – doing the bidding of his master come what may. Slaves who know they are slaves will hate their abject condition. They won’t work well. They will resist. They will be troublesome. It takes a lot of time and effort to control them. It costs money. What is the solution? They must be brought to the point where they CHOOSE to be slaves, where they actively will it. Of course, the name “slave” must be dispensed with, but there are plenty of euphemisms for it: employee, consumer, customer, voter, citizen.

It all comes down to the same thing…billions of people follow the commands of the elite and toil for the benefit of the elite. That is the essence of the master-slave relationship. In a free world of free men, human beings obey themselves and work for their own benefit. They look around and there is no elite to be seen because such a thing is inconceivable. Would the Supermen of Nietzsche tolerate being slaves of an elite? Would the “Community of Gods” of the Illuminati bow to “higher” gods?

The very concept of a master class imposing their will on a slave class is repellent.

In a movie about Catholic martyr Thomas Becket, a medieval Archbishop of Canterbury, Becket declared of an arrogant, rich Lord whose men had murdered a monk on his orders:

“We declare him excommunicate and anathema. We cast him into the outer darkness. We judge him damned, with the Devil and his fallen angels and all the reprobates, to eternal fire and everlasting pain.”

Scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRt2cKvJLlE

We metaphorically say the same thing of all masters. The concept of “master” must be permanently abolished. It must play no part in the human condition. Any worthwhile political system must be the one that addresses first and foremost the problem of the master, the problem of how to destroy the wolf that preys on us. Only when it is slain can we concentrate on building the world as it always should have been.

The elite mostly keep their dirty secrets well hidden. But if you open your eyes, you will see what’s really going on.

The facts: we are living under the control of a small but vastly powerful group. They are called the Old World Order because they have held power over us for millennia. They bear responsibility for the cruel, savage, selfish and greed-fuelled history of our world; the horrors have been committed specifically to allow them to have the type of world they desire – with them as masters and everyone else as their slaves.

Their goal is simple: to acquire as much money as they can lay their hands on, to achieve permanent power for themselves and their families and to have as much fun at our expense as possible. Instead of fighting each other for supremacy, they cooperate because there are enough fools and slaves to sustain them all, but only so long as not too many are admitted to the charmed circle.

******

Facts about the Old World Order.

1. The world is controlled by a global elite of 6,000 members.
2. 94% of them are male and the average age is 60.
3. 2% of the world population own 50% of the world’s wealth.
4. 1100 billionaires own twice as much wealth as the 2.5 billion poorest people.
5. The world’s 50 biggest financial institutions control a third of the world’s wealth.
6. The 250 biggest corporations generate nearly a third of the world’s GDP.

(Source: The Superclass and the World they are Making by David Rothkopf.)

Few of the Old World Order are elected (and those that are have had the elections rigged on their behalf). Few of them are accountable to the people in any way. Few of them interact with ordinary men and women. They live in exclusive, gated, luxury communities far from the citizens they control.

They are educated at exclusive private schools and colleges and they join elite secret societies in order to meet other members of the Old World Order. They marry amongst themselves. The vast majority have inherited their wealth and status. Talent and merit don’t matter to them; family connections are what count. “He/she comes from a good family” is their code for their own kind. If you don’t come from a good family, forget it.

Despite their greed, these people often present themselves as highly religious e.g. Goldman Sucks: “We are performing God’s work.”

They control practically everything worth controlling. They treat us with contempt. We are just the worker-droids and zombie consumers, the “cannon fodder” and flotsam and jetsam.

They use the education system to produce dumb, obedient, submissive and compliant slaves who won’t resist their masters. The Old World Order consists of the following categories:

The Super Rich
Top politicians
Top military
Top police
Media moguls
Religious leaders
Bosses of Intelligence Services
Top Bankers
Leading Entrepreneurs
Super celebrities

******

The members of the Old World Order are.

Nobility: the royal and aristocratic houses of the United Kingdom and Europe.

Family Dynasties: Rockefeller, Rothschild, Astor, Bundy, Collins, DuPont, Freeman, Reynolds, Van Duyn, Li, Bush, Onassis, Brzezinski, Kissinger, Kennedy, Murdoch, Ackermann, Russel, Trump, Buffet, Sorros, McDonald, Merkel, Sarkozy, Bernanke, Greenspan, Gore, Clinton etc.

The following organizations serve the Old World Order: modern Freemasons (with a handful of notable exceptions who have retained the values of the original Freemasons), the Priesthood of AMEN, the Brotherhood of the Shadows, Skull and Bones, the Bullingdon Club, the Thule and Vril Societies, Bohemian Grove, the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, B’nai B’rith, UNO, and NATO. There are many others – poodle organisations, bought and sold by their masters.

These groups manipulate politics, the economy, education, the media, the law, the military, public perception. They control our psychology. They make us buy into their “vision”.

How did the OWO get to where they now are? With the help of concentration camps, RFID chips, aliens and population reduction? Or with infinitely more elegant and lucrative methods that command our blind faith and allegiance? Never forget: the best slave is the one who thinks he’s free.

The methods the global elite use to maintain control over the people are:

1) De-mock-racy. You think you have a choice? Dream on. You can vote for whomever they choose to put in front of you. The candidates are carefully chosen by the Old World Order. Obama? – check out his list of corporate sponsors, including Goldman Sachs. His first chief of staff was the son of a Zionist terrorist. The OWO knew Obama was their boy, regardless of his rhetoric and background. A complete sellout. And, of course, if you didn’t get Obama then you would get Clinton instead. Call that a choice? Has your vote ever counted?

“If elections changed anything, they would be forbidden!” –Tucholsky

2) Free market capitalism

3) Psychology

4) Junk food and TV (bread and circuses)

5) Religion

6) Law

(The “law” is a playground for gangsters. Its purpose is to protect the interests of the elite. The last thing it serves is justice. Ordinary people don’t stand a chance. Everything is rigged. As Hildebrandt said, “It is not enough to have right. You also have to count in the legal system.”

7) Conspiracy theories

Many conspiracy theories are created and spread by the Old World Order to distract people and keep them busy with pointless, ridiculous nonsense. Instead of fighting against the global elite, many bloggers are obsessed with events that are never going to happen. They waste their time endlessly researching “chem trails” and the “orbit of Nibiru”. You won’t catch these people researching Pythagoras, Leibniz or Hegel – too much like hard work, too much like reality rather than fantasy.

Conspiracy theories belong to the landscape of Mythos rather than Logos. They are exciting stories, but have nothing to do with logic and reason. Most conspiracy theories are barking mad. That’s not to say that no one is conspiring – they certainly are – but there’s a clear difference between conspiracy theories based on the extent to which an elite group controls the media, as one example, and those that assert than pan-dimensional, shape-shifting lizard men are running around inside the hollow earth. The former is credible and rational, the second is for lunatics and the borderline psychotic. People who believe in the most outlandish of the conspiracy theories are actually suffering from mental illness, hence it is impossible to talk them out of their delusions.

8) The military and the police: the armed wing of the Old World Order, their bullyboys who enforce their will. All soldiers and police are traitors and enemies of the people.
__________

The Fake Messiahs:

Who “saved” us from the global financial crisis? The very people who caused it. How did they save us? By piling vast debts onto us while making sure they kept their fat bonuses. They should be fired and in jail for their crimes against the people. They are legalised thieves who have stolen our money from right under our noses. Resist the controllers. Disobey their system. Show the elite they can kiss our asses. We don’t need to take this any longer. Don’t you want to be a knight sitting at the Round Table rather than a serf serving your lords and masters?

So are you going to continue your life as a “resource” or start the journey of becoming an authentic human being with a real contribution to make?
__________

The Rigged System:

In the UK, the party of the privileged elite is the Conservative Party. Behind closed doors, Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron told senior City executives: “My father was a stockbroker; my grandfather was a stockbroker; my great-grandfather was a stockbroker.” Yes, David, we get the message loud and clear.

Cameron, who went to Eton, Oxford and was a member of the Bullingdon Club, is a person who owes everything to the background he comes from, yet he likes to say, “It’s not where we came from, it’s where we’re going that counts.” Of course, if he came from a housing project in one of the many deprived areas of the UK, he wouldn’t be going anywhere other than the local dole office. It’s incredible that the super rich are able, with a straight face, to deny that their background is in any way contributory to their success. Only a cretin would believe them.

Most of the donations to Cameron’s right-wing party come from hedge fund managers, financiers, bankers, private equity speculators, investment fund managers and stockbrokers. They are his paymasters and he dutifully does their bidding, not that he needs any prompting: their interests are his. His donors all come from the same background as he does. They are a hyper-efficient cartel feathering their own nests.

What we need is civic society, not selfish society. Some bankers and traders killed themselves at the height of the Wall Street crash in 1929. In 2008, the same type of people simply demanded higher bonuses. Many of the senior executives at Lehman Brothers were kept on at the taxpayers’ expense to unravel all of the financial positions of their bankrupt organisation. As “compensation”, they demanded bonuses as large as those they were receiving when times were good.

In other words, these guys know how to win whether their organisation is booming or is actually bust. In a healthy nation, they would have been told to clear up their own mess at their own expense or go to jail. Why should bankrupt bankers be allowed to dictate terms to the taxpayers? It’s insane. Which American taxpayers had any say in this? None! Whatever happened to no taxation without representation?

The bankers have set up a system akin to going to Vegas as high rollers and being given every pleasure and privilege the casino can offer. If they win, they keep all the profits. If they lose, they get us to pick up the tab. Nice work if you can get it!

Neil Barofsky, the US Treasury Department’s Inspector General, wrote, “We will end up in a similar or greater crisis in two, or five, or ten years’ time. It is hard to see how any of the fundamental problems have been addressed to date. [The bailouts] saved our financial system from driving off a cliff in 2008 [but] we are still driving on the same winding mountain road, but this time in a faster car.”

Another crash within ten years will signal the end of democratic capitalism. To avoid catastrophe, its replacement – meritocratic “public” capitalism based on public not private capital – must be standing ready in the wings.
__________

The Kleptocracy:

The Old World Order run a corporate kleptocracy. They are always robbing us, exploiting us, manipulating us. The banks are a kleptocracy – government by thieves, stealing from the people.
__________

2/10

The primary function of the banking system is to invest in the business enterprises of the people. Banks should not exist to speculate, engage in casino operations and award obscenely large bonuses. There will be many public banks, all in competition with each other and supervised by a Supreme Economic Council of experts of the calibre of Nobel laureates. Each bank will be able to operate independently, using its own business methods and practices. The more profits they make, the more they can pay themselves.

Competition between banks is vital to ensure innovation and to prevent complacency. No bank should ever be too big to fail, and the regulators should ensure that no bank gets to the position where it is likely to fail. Banks should become long-term investors in companies set up by worker partnerships. Public banks will take the place of private finance.

Groups of friends and colleagues with a good business idea will approach the banks with a business plan and ask for set-up funds and development finance. In exchange, the lending bank will gain a significant shareholding and be paid dividends. The more successful the company, the more profit the bank will make.

Public rather than private banks will be the primary source of capital in the economy. There will be no Zionist, Masonic and Ivy League networking going on behind the scenes to finance the favoured few and deny investment funds to ordinary people. In the New Economy, private capital will be largely replaced with public capital, private corporations with public corporations. Capitalism – currently an economic system of private wealth – will essentially be replaced by Public Capitalism, a radical new system that combines capitalism with socialism.

Why was Soviet Communism a disaster? It was a dictatorial, totalitarian system where anyone who wanted to get on had to become a member of the Communist Party. Because of communist ideology which provided no incentives whatever for ordinary people to become wealthy through their own hard work, talent and ideas, innovation died. Enormous state monopolies controlled every aspect of the economy. There was no competition hence every monopoly became complacent, ossified and inefficient. Communism, supposedly based on Marxist dialectics, completely forgot that the dialectic must be applied to all aspects of society. Competition and contradiction is the essence of the dialectic. No competition or contradiction was allowed in the Soviet Union, hence the whole system was rotten and dialectically dead. Its failure was dialectically guaranteed. The trouble with Marxists, and even Marx himself, was that they didn’t truly understand the Hegelian dialectic.

When the Berlin Wall came down, many people drew the absurd conclusion that capitalism had been proved beyond doubt to be the best possible economic system. Two decades later, capitalism itself died. In 2008, the capitalist banks were insolvent and capitalism was able to continue only thanks to public (i.e. socialist) financial intervention.

Contrast the bankrupt West with Communist China, likely to become the world’s economic hyper power in the next ten years. Communist China has shown the whole world how a peasant economy can be transformed into a global powerhouse in a few years through a judicious combination of communism and capitalism, and centralised state investment in private enterprise.

Aren’t you astounded that no Western government has ever suggested that perhaps Western nations should adopt aspects of the Chinese model? Why haven’t they highlighted why China didn’t suffer a financial catastrophe? The answer is simple – China had no greedy private bankers and a super-rich gangster class dictating to the government and taking unbelievable risks with other people’s money. That is not a message that the Old World Order want “Main Street” to be discussing. Chinese Communist Capitalism has shown that the world can exist perfectly well without the Zionist-Masonic Old World Order version of capitalism. There will be no Soviet-style economic collapse if the OWO are swept away – China proves that.

Communist China offers a highly centralised command and control economy that nevertheless allows capitalism and innovation to flourish. Now imagine that the Chinese Communist Party is replaced by a Dialectical Meritocracy dedicated to making the most of the people’s talents without any ideology and requiring no party membership. How much more successful would that be? That’s what we can have in the West.

Make no mistake, a huge cover-up and conspiracy is going on in the West to prevent the people from realising the truth that is now all too apparent: Western capitalism dominated by the super rich has failed and already has a more successful rival in the shape of Communist-Capitalist China run by a totalitarian regime rather than Zionists and Masons.

Meritocratic public capitalism will be even more successful. There is nothing at all to fear from the overthrow of democratic capitalism. China has proved it beyond any conceivable question. The Chinese have avoided financial mayhem while enjoying enormous economic growth – the precise combination Western governments dream of. So why isn’t a single Western government taking on board the appropriate lessons? Are they pathologically stupid, or is the truth that the Old World Order are blocking any moves and reforms that will threaten their position?

The world is ready for a new economic system. The age of the super rich is over. We are living in the twilight of the idols, the false gods who have reigned over us for so long.
__________

Media:

Given the importance and influence of the media, it is unacceptable for it to be in private hands. Media mogul Rupert Murdoch exerts an absurd degree of control in the world. Why was one man permitted to control so many of the access portals to the minds of the people? Never again. The media must be under public control.
__________

The Law:

The legal system is a tool for subjugating the people. Instead of killing them with a gun – a dirty method that might provoke revenge attacks – a judge knocks on a table with a small hammer to murder them, at least financially and career-wise. Law evolved in the first place to protect the property and wealth of the rich. The law is no friend of the poor and unconnected. It’s a lottery whether you get justice or not. If you tossed a coin, you would get almost equally good results without any of the expense associated with extremely rich lawyers. If a coin toss delivers justice 50% of the time at no cost, is a legal system that costs an absolute fortune yet improves the justice rate by only about 10% worth the money? Shouldn’t we spend the money on something else such as education that will produce smart people who won’t commit the sorts of crimes the poor and desperate are driven to?

Truth and innocence should, but won’t, help you in a court. An expensive lawyer who has specialized in exploiting complicated laws – created by people who have a great deal of interest in controlling people but none in creating a proper system of justice – can easily win a case regardless of its merits.

“A law is only then legitimate when even the last swineherd in Galicia understands it.” –Empress Maria Theresa of Austria

A good defence will more likely be based on excellent acting skills and exploiting obscure loopholes than on the matter in hand. And let’s not forget the senile, privileged judge wearing a silly costume and confronting modern technology such as computers. He doesn’t have a clue.

The current legal system is there for the preservation of the interests of the Old World Order. End of story. They don’t want people to get in the way of their business. The law is a “clean” and “legitimate” way to get rid of enemies. Just as money laundering puts illegal money in legal circulation, so law laundering cleanses injustice.
__________

As Clear as Mud:

The doctrine of “political transparency” proclaims that you will be informed about your nation’s political assembly, the aims of the different parties, and so on. Everything about how you are governed will be open and above board, and always available for public scrutiny. What a joke. Our politicians won’t even tell us how much money they earn (from their “outside” interests) on top of the pile of cash we are obliged to pay them for such woeful results. The politicians of the UK, who once claimed to be the least corrupt politicians in the world, have now been exposed as amongst the worst.

They desperately tried to avoid their ludicrously extravagant expenses being published, but eventually campaigners brought the whole sleazy mess into the open. UK politicians were getting things like “duck houses” and “moat cleaning services” paid for them from the public purse. They were getting the taxpayers to pay their mortgages on second homes.

Rich men were buying titles and honours from the government. There is a member of the British House of Lords who is not domiciled in Britain, thus allowing him to avoid his full UK tax bill, yet this man is a chief contributor to the Conservative Party, the current governing party, and is involved in passing UK laws. Many ex-politicians become lobbyists, using their political connections to earn vast sums.

Former Prime Minister Tony Blair, a man from a highly privileged background, is now raking in money from company directorships and speeches to major corporations (getting paid around $100,000 for an hour’s work). When he became leader of the Labour Party, it was supposedly a socialist party. What a joke.

Apart from all of the fingers they have in so many pies, what else might politicians be hiding from us? Maybe that they are the puppets of a shadow government running the world? Maybe that these shadow figures are responsible for all the wars, corruption, hunger and inequality in the world?

How many democratic politicians have ever questioned the validity of democracy? If democracy never challenges itself then is it not the same as totalitarianism? All democratic nations are effectively one-party states. The differences between democratic parties are purely cosmetic. You can get anything you like as long as it’s democracy. As Henry Ford said, “Any customer can have a car painted any colour that he wants so long as it is black.”

Why are we never striving for something new and better? Why is there never any debate about reforms to democracy, especially in this age of technological revolution?

Democracy is usually combined with free market capitalism: another concept that promises us prosperity, order and stability. Just ask yourself: are the markets and currencies stable? Is the money fairly distributed? Are the resources equally shared between the countries and the people?

The fat pigs of the Old World Order want us, their servants, to fill the gold money troughs in which they bury their long snouts after they have played casino games with the world’s economy.

A market without strict regulation immediately attracts cheaters and exploiters, carpetbaggers and robber barons. They already own a half of the planet and control the vast bulk of the money, one way or another. Don’t hope that they will use their resources for the benefit of humanity: you won’t find more selfish people in this galaxy. And, even though they are unelected, they dictate to governments. Who’s really running the country? Elected politicians or unelected bankers?

Are the financial affairs of the bankers made transparent to the people? You must be joking. The taxes paid by every banker should be a matter of public record. Then we’ll see how good their tax avoidance and tax evasion lawyers and accountants really are.

Free market capitalism guarantees that a small elite will control and exploit the world with minimal interference. Globalism allows companies to exploit slaves in South-East Asia to produce commodities ridiculously cheaply. Afterwards, they sell this low quality junk in the West as branded clothing for a massive premium. Then advertisers brainwash you to think that you can’t do without these brands. 24/7 we are bombarded with adverts selling trash to us, to make the capitalist exploiters even wealthier. Screw the brands! Your deeds and conduct define you, not the stupid logos and designer jeans you wear.

Aren’t you fed up with the “banksters” (banker+gangster)? Don’t pay protection money to the Finance Mob! The Mafia use force to rob you; the OWO use the law, the banks and capitalism. The objective is exactly the same – to screw over the weak to enrich themselves.
__________

The Greatest Party Ever:

Do you want to be invited to the greatest party ever? It’s already going on, but you’re not at it, and never likely to be unless you do something radical.

Imagine that, miraculously, you got an invite and you were allowed to walk past the huge crowd perpetually milling around outside the party. Once you were in, once you were part of the charmed circle and had discovered that it was full of everything you ever desired (apart from being a fraction too crowded), you would have a sudden and unexpected desire – you wouldn’t want anyone else to get in. Well, they would only make things more crowded and uncomfortable and take some of the things you want. You want to tell the party organisers to pull up the drawbridge, to slam the door shut to all newcomers, especially since there’s another remarkable feature of this party: it goes on indefinitely and contains all life. Babies are born at this party, and, conversely, some of the party-goers are eventually all partied out and die. If more people are born than die, the party will get more congested.

Welcome to the greatest party ever: the party of the Old World Order, the party you will never be attending. Think how much easier your life would be if you were one of the fortunate few born at the party and who grow up surrounded by the party. Your whole life would be lived out at this best of all parties. Never a worry for you. Permanent party time. We call this Privilege. Those who are blessed to be born at the party have gilded lives. They don’t have to struggle and strive to get to the party because they’re already there, and always have been. Paris Hilton is such a person. If she hadn’t been born into privilege, she would probably have been a lap dancer since she’s not qualified for much else.

So, what are you going to do? Will you let this great party go on forever without you? You’re permanently straining to see what’s going on at this brilliant party. Every day, reports come out of the latest amazing and thrilling happenings. You see fabulously glamorous pictures of incredibly beautiful people, all enjoying the finest things life has to offer. You can’t stop thinking about it. Your whole life is consumed by the desire to get into this party. You are completely alienated from your own life because you know the action is permanently elsewhere. Your life is defined by THEIR party. No one wants to be at YOUR party. No one cares about it. It’s a bore.

You’re a bore. And, deep down, you know it’s right that you don’t get admitted to the party – because you haven’t made the slightest effort to host a better party. You have no imagination, no creativity and no talent, no money and no sexy friends, so why on earth would anyone come to your party? If they won’t let you into the party, you have several choices. 1) Just accept that you’re a dull failure in comparison with the shining ones. 2) Force them to change the admission requirements of their party. 3) Or create a much better party, one to which they’re now the ones struggling to get in.

So, what will it be?
__________

Anti-OWO Law:

The world is rigged. The privileged elite – the Old World Order – have set up a system that ensures they always win. It’s invariably their interests that are served, never those of the people. It doesn’t matter how intelligent, creative and talented you are. If you’re not one of the “in-crowd”, you’ll never be allowed anywhere near real power, unless you’re willing to be their dancing puppet. The people who rule the world couldn’t care less about anything other than feathering their own nests. They have done an EXCELLENT job of that. Shame about everything else.

Feudalism has been re-branded as “democracy”, but the nice new name doesn’t hide the fact that we’re still the serfs of the elite, just as we’ve always been. And our real Lords (still unelected) hide behind a curtain while we deal with their front men – the “democratic” politicians. Nothing has changed since medieval times. The elite still only marry their “equals” (i.e. none of us), they prefer to live in exclusive gated communities (castles) and they control all of the most important jobs.

At least they’ve lost the “law of the first night” (jus primae noctis), also known as droit du seigneur (the lord’s right) – the right to be the first to fuck a serf’s bride on her wedding night. Or have they? Rich old men and any shiny celebrity can get virtually any attractive young woman in our society, such is the lure of money, privilege and fame.

How many brand new brides would turn down the chance to fuck Brad Pitt or George Clooney if it arose on their wedding day?

These modern feudal lords can ruin countries, start wars, manipulate the markets and do whatever they like to advance their agenda. Their aims are simple: wealth, power and fun at our expense. A small, global network of just a few thousand people controls the world. The last thing they want is transparency: the natural enemy of conspirators. They never want anyone to be given a clear view of what is happening behind the curtain. But why should we, the people, allow these people to conceal themselves from us? If they are controlling our lives then isn’t it reasonable that we should know everything about them? If they are keeping the best jobs in society for themselves, and for their families and friends, shouldn’t we be allowed to see what’s going on so that we can do something about it?

The best jobs should go to the most talented people, regardless of their “connections”. Merit is the only thing that matters, not what family you were born into and which schools and colleges you attended. Yet it is dynastic families that rule our world. To all intents and purposes, they are hereditary monarchs. They might as well wear crowns, sit on thrones and point their gilded sceptres at us. We might as well get down on our knees before them. Their mantra is “birth before worth” i.e. the identity of your parents and how they fared in life remains much more important than your personal merit.

Yet it’s easy for us to strike back. A single, simple law could destroy the global elite’s secrecy once and for all. All that’s required is a statute that compels the elite to reveal key information about themselves. We call this the “Anti-elite” Law.

This is the information we need from the top 1% of the wealthiest people of every country in the world:

Which school, college and university did they attend?

Were they members of any exclusive clubs during their time at these institutions?

Which private clubs, Masonic Lodges and secret societies are they currently members of?

What is their religion?

How much did they earn in the last year and how much tax did they pay?

Are they friends or relatives of anyone else listed in the top 1%? With this simple information, we would see all of the secrets of the elite. We would see exactly how the system is rigged against the rest of us. Of course, the elite would never cooperate, but that simply proves they have something to hide.

Why should we care about their “need” for privacy? When you join the elite and start controlling the lives of billions of others, you lose any right to privacy, don’t you? That’s the price you pay.

Here is what we would discover if the Anti-elite Law were passed:

The young members of the global elite go to exclusive private schools, colleges and universities. They join elite societies such as Skull & Bones and the Bullingdon Club to meet “equals” and to help them build an elite social network. The Old World Order consists mostly of WASPs (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants) and rich Zionists.

Many are members of exclusive Masonic lodges (which many ordinary Freemasons don’t even know about), and other elite societies that lurk in the shadows. They also belong to organisations like the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, and the World Economic Forum. These individuals are masters of tax avoidance and evasion. They pay virtually no tax at all, despite their incredible wealth. “Tax is for the little people,” they like to say. Well, now the little people demand to know exactly how little tax the rich actually pay.The rich aren’t at all keen on surrendering any of their riches to the taxman. That’s what we – the suckers – are there for. Instead, the Old World Order specialise in spending other people’s money: ours!

Membership of elite societies is a guarantee of success in our society. Merit isn’t. It’s always who you know rather than what you know. Most members of the OWO are not elected in any way. They are “appointed”. If they fuck something up, they simply switch jobs and even get a fat pay-off. They would never grant the same consideration to you, of course. The OWO consists of rich Zionist bankers to provide the financial muscle, and privileged and aristocratic families to provide the social connections and status. The so-called “President” of the European Union, Hermann van Rompuy, was never elected by the people of Europe, nor was EU foreign minister Baroness Catherine Ashton.

Baroness? What fucking century is this? They have no expertise, and we don’t even know who they are, but nevertheless they are two of the “leaders” of Europe. Isn’t that totally weird? Imagine if the American President didn’t need to bother being elected by the people, but was simply appointed like a Pope by his close associates. That’s the world the elite would love. Hell would surely be unleashed if people realized just how much they were being manipulated by the privileged elite.

The Anti-elite Law would reveal all; put it all on the table for everyone to see.

It’s time to demand that the Anti-elite Law is passed in your country. Refuse to vote for any politician who does not support it. Make no mistake, any politician who fails to support it is a member of the elite and your sworn enemy. If he supports the Anti-elite Law, he has proved that he’s a politician acting on behalf of the people rather than the rich. If not, get rid of him! This is a simple law, but it is also one of the most profound in human history. It marks the end of rule by the rich, privileged elite. Spread the word. Let’s change the world.
__________

Activism:

The elite see themselves as gods, but they are nothing without us. If they didn’t have us to do their bidding, they would starve.

To destroy the elite, we need to destroy the pillars of their tyranny:

1) Democracy.

2) Abrahamic religion.

3) The psychological message that the rich deserve their wealth and are morally superior to everyone else.

4) The laziness, ignorance, apathy and fear they have instilled in us to control us.

Above all, we must attack the elite’s supreme God, their reason for living and the tool they use to manipulate the globe: MONEY.

In our society, money equals power and that’s the reason why money is unfairly distributed. Some people have personal wealth hundreds of millions of times greater than that of the poorest people in the world. How could anyone ever consider that reasonable and acceptable?

Here’s a thought experiment from the German cabaret artist Volker Pispers. Imagine all investment bankers, business advisers and stock market analysts falling dead, or all the fire fighters, nurses and doctors. Whom would you miss? If all the members of the elite died tomorrow, would anyone care? Or would it be time to break out the champagne? The elite are parasites, living off the efforts of others. Many of the people we really need for a well-functioning society – such as teachers and nurses – can’t even afford an apartment in the city where they work.

The privileged are like spoiled little children who believe that they are the centre of the universe, but whereas reality kicks in for ordinary children, it never does for these privileged people. They have remained children because they are shielded from harsh reality by their privileged lifestyles. They don’t have to worry about money or finding a good job or a decent place to live. It’s all handed to them on a plate. They desire to be on top of the world, to have people bowing to them and to own more toys than all the other children. The world is screwed because the people running it are spoiled, incompetent brats. No adults have taught them the error of their ways.

Sad, isn’t it? It’s even sadder that we play along. These children have to learn that they are part of a big group called humanity and everyone deserves their place inside this group, and an equal opportunity to have the finer things in life. Don’t future generations deserve something better? Isn’t it our job to provide it? Don’t you want future generations to look back and say, “I would give anything to have been back there with those amazing people who changed the world. We are forever in their debt.” You can be one of the heroes. It’s time to make your choice.

******

“J” sent us a message that captures in a few sentences much of what we are trying to communicate. The content of our series of books is now simply enormous, and it’s always a good idea if you can boil down the most meaningful parts for yourself into a few brief lines that you can carry around with you forever. We say this not just regarding our material, but everything you read. Try to summarise in a couple of paragraphs any book you read. By doing so, you will capture its essence. Things that seem complicated can suddenly seem radically, even childishly simple.

For example, Islam can be reduced to a single idea. God orders Abraham to kill his son Ishmael, and Shaytan pleads with Abraham to spare the boy’s life. Three times, Abraham violently drives Shaytan away with stones and at last gets ready to plunge his dagger into his son. That’s all you need to know about Islam. All the rest is propaganda and bullshit. Whether or not you are attracted to Islam depends solely on if you seriously believe that God would order you to kill your child, and that for you to prove your obedience to God and faith in him, you must agree. You must also believe that someone who pleads for your son’s life is not good but evil. Once you have reached the conclusion that God orders murder and must be obeyed while Shaytan craves mercy and must be resisted, you are ready for Islam – because you are literally mad. You are a Devil worshipper and you will do anything for Allah; the true Satan. You have submitted to him in every way possible, and that’s exactly what the word Islam means – submission. No dominant person, no moral person, could ever find Islam anything other than sickening to the core. When you capture Islam’s essence, it becomes almost inconceivable that something like 1.3 billion people in this world subscribe to an ideology that says it is right to agree to kill your children if God orders it, and wrong to listen to anyone who says you shouldn’t.

A person’s relationship with “God” is thus defined in the most extreme way possible. Let’s just imagine that Allah actually declared himself Shaytan. Would a Muslim stop believing, or wouldn’t it make the slightest difference? If you unconditionally believe in a God who demands of you that you should perform human sacrifice on your own children, haven’t you proved beyond question that you don’t care if he is God or Satan? After all, what could he ask of you that was any worse? A rational person would define a good God as someone who doesn’t command you to murder someone to prove your obedience to him. If you couldn’t care less about that definition, you obviously couldn’t care less whether you are worshipping God or the Devil. So is anyone surprised that Muslims carried out 9/11? The only surprise is that they’re not killing or maiming people all day every day in the name of their God. (Well, actually, they are.)

In Afghanistan, Bibi Aisha, 18, fled from her husband’s constant violence. The Taliban tracked her down. While her brother-in-law held her down, her husband cut off her nose then sliced off her ears.

Bibi Aisha is literally the face of Islam – mutilated and disfigured. Islam is legalised male violence against woman. In Islamic countries a woman who has been raped requires four witnesses because a man’s testimony is always more credible than a woman’s. And the likelihood of having four witnesses to a violent rape is…? Moreover, if the woman doesn’t prove her case, she can be found guilty of fornication or adultery and then be flogged, beheaded or stoned to death.

Islam – the rapists’ charter.

“In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.”

******

From J:

Subject: Facebook, the vanity nation, will be inverted and converted, in time, to the Gnostic nation.

I sat down and wrote this then decided to post it to Facebook. It pains me to know that my words will fall on blind eyes and deaf ears. But I know some will feel it, and in doing so magnify its potential to reach others. I am feeding the growth of the profoundest of archetypal entities. Truth will naturally reach its omega point. And if what I speak holds no truth for someone, I implore him to never stop seeking it.

I know this earth to be a living breathing organism, where every person, animal, and tree has a soul of its own, and like the neurons in a brain, each contributes to the infrastructure of the whole, the whole being greater than the sum of its parts. Relative to our understanding of sociology and psychology, all cultures, social constructs, religions, economies, and education systems are the very essence of a collective ego. And where there is an angel there IS a demon.

While we immerse ourselves in the trivialities of everyday living, a substantial counter force has been steadily gaining momentum since the dawn of time. Make no mistake, no individual in this universe is exempt from this divine force, and each one of us contributes to its evolution. Some may even say it is the driving force behind evolution itself. Not Darwinian Evolution, but a much broader way of transformation, that takes into account the evolution of solar systems, galaxies, the entire universe – the Evolution of God. It manifests itself in the profoundest of ways, it is the counter to all things culture, it is the underground. With qualities both hideous and magnificent, it is a force rooted in consciousness, yearning to actualise its deepest potential.

Sadly, we are not yet a conscious race of beings; one need only look to the Abrahamic religions of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam to confirm this. Awareness, or a lack thereof, is the product and producer of faith. The blind faith that is imposed upon the ignorant masses acts as a conveyor belt leading straight into the center mass of the abyss.

And as some say, stare into the abyss for too long and eventually the abyss stares into you. The people who have managed to tread the narrow bridge over this darkness deserve a better foundation to construct the temple of their soul. Although the time is yet to come, mathematics will inevitably be that foundation. Science, true science, not the corrupted egotistic form that is scientism, will be the underlying premise for all that we accomplish in the future. This is not to imply that all we have realized has been in vain. It is true that we have to some extent tamed this overwhelmingly hostile yet beautiful reality. We have accomplished feats of enormity in our time and history, but a new age is upon us, the next stage in our conscious evolution. Only through knowledge will we illuminate our souls in this Dark Age.

So know that this is more than the game. Know that faith is the silver thread spun by the ultimate tyrant. Know that this is an ancient circus, and we are the lions, whipped into submission, tired and miserable, introspective, patiently waiting.

******

Just know this; there is no vanity in the force you have collectively initiated.
__________

3/10

1) Either the universe is created, being the work of an eternal, uncreated, perfect entity (God) – as Abrahamism maintains.

2) Or the universe is eternal and uncreated and is itself God, albeit a God evolving towards perfection – as the Enlightenment religions teach.

3) Or the universe is created out of nothing – as scientific materialism asserts, and has no connection at all with any type of God.

According to the first option, God precedes the universe as an immortal being, eternally perfect and infinitely powerful, and he creates the universe according to his own divine plan out of nothing.

According to the second option, the universe itself is God, but a God on a cosmic journey from infinite potential to infinite actualisation. This view reaches its maximum expression in the philosophy of the Illuminati Grand Master Hegel. According to the third option, God has nothing to do with anything, and nor does mind or free will, and the universe unfolds according to the implacable laws of materialistic physics. The origin of the laws of physics, the appearance of matter out of nothing and the emergence of life, mind and consciousness remain open questions in this scenario.

Atheists and Hegelians reject the possibility of an eternal, perfect God. There is no form of logic that can equate the evolutionary world we see all around us with a perfect world created by a perfect God. In particular, Abrahamists have never been able to offer any credible account of how evil, suffering and imperfection exist in a universe created as an act of supreme love (allegedly) by a perfect, all-powerful God. In fact, this God’s actions seem rather the product of the uttermost hate for humanity. He inflicts original sin on humanity, drowns the earth, and sends almost all of its souls to hell. Those he saves, he does so on a whim. So, a god or a devil?

Moreover, the universe is either a) immense beyond the imagining or b) actually infinite in extent. Why would God create such a universe? In what way would it reveal his divine plan? What could that plan possibly be? It is mad to assert that a Creator would have created an infinitely large universe. A Creator creates something special, something specific into which he pours his essence. He does not create an indiscriminate cosmic mass, without boundary or definition. No sculptor would set out to sculpt infinity – the sculpture would never have any discernible shape; it would simply continue forever. It would never be anything with a meaning. It would never be a work of art. No painter would paint infinity – it would never have any frame. It would not be something that you could gaze upon and discern its meaning. All art could actually be said to be the taming of the infinite, the deliberate act of rendering the infinite finite. Only the finite makes sense. Only the finite can be captured. Only the finite is special. An infinite process, in order to create meaning, has no alternative but to create finitude.

What is the arche, the fundamental substance of the universe? It is God in his barest, simplest, most abstract sense. A scientific term such as “dimensionless energy” could be used instead, but it is God all the same. The arche is the unconscious mind of the unconscious God. The arche has no dimensions. It does not exist in space and time since space and time do not themselves exist when existence is considered in its most elementary condition. Space and time will emerge in due course from God, but they do not exist with him as aspects of the most primitive form of existence.

Bare existence is extraordinary. It is Will to Actualisation i.e. it is pure potential that wants, that desires, that yearns, that longs for something. For what? To BECOME. To become what? To become everything it has it within itself to be. To become PERFECTION. That is why the Will to Actualisation is none other than God. Teleological potential has only one aim – to become perfect actualisation.

Bare existence comprises just this potential, this Will to Actualisation. If potential did not want to become anything then it never would. Nothing meaningful can happen without a will to make it happen. Scientists speak of the “heat death” of the universe when all the useful energy in the cosmos has been expended and nothing remains other than a freezing universe of evenly distributed atoms – eternally dead interstellar dust. Bizarrely, it has never occurred to scientists that this state is impossible for the extremely simple reason that if it were possible for the universe to be dead then it already would be given that, one way or another, the universe has existed for eternity.

Existence is not something that can be created or destroyed. It just IS. Existence is ISNESS. But it is not static. If it were, the universe would remain in one state forever, and be equivalent to, and as meaningless as, eternal, absolute nothingness. So the ISNESS of existence is always becoming a new ISNESS i.e. existence is perpetual BECOMING. Becoming involves change, energy, movement. That cannot be emphasized enough. Potential = becoming = energy = movement = change = the Will to Actualisation = the arche = bare existence = the fundamental “stuff” of the universe = teleology = entelechy = unconscious mind = God “hidden”. They all mean the same thing. The universe is driven forward because the universe is purposeful movement. If it were purposeless movement, it would just go round and round in circles, never attaining any higher states, but in fact it’s always achieving more, always evolving.

The universe cannot stop becoming. It cannot freeze. It cannot change from becoming into frozen being. It can suffer no heat death, or indeed death of any kind. It cannot be destroyed. It cannot go out of existence. The fate decreed by the Second Law of Thermodynamics is impossible. If it were possible for all energy to be used up – for becoming to stop – it would have happened infinitely long ago.

Existence, the universe, is a perpetual motion machine. How could it be otherwise? If the universe could run out of puff – if that were a possible thing that could happen, a possible state that could be attained – then it would have happened already and we would not be here to pour scorn on the idea. Particle physicists say themselves that anything not forbidden is compulsory. If cosmic heat death were not forbidden it would be compulsory and it would have occurred infinitely long ago, and the cosmos would still be in that state now.

The Big Bang itself is the surest disproof of the Second Thermodynamics that it is possible to have and yet legions of Nobel Prize winning scientists have failed to notice this elementary fact. If something as logically outrageous as a whole universe emerging from “nothing” can happen how can anyone be so stupid as to claim that the universe will perpetually freeze? (And if a universe could spring out of nothing 14 billion years ago, it must have been able to do so eons before for exactly the same reasons: indeed it must have been able to do so an infinite number times since there is no sufficient reason to forbid it.) Moreover, if there are countless black holes in the universe, relentlessly sucking matter into them, what sane person will seriously suggest that the universe is doomed to reach frozen stasis?

The Second Law of Thermodynamics is yet another statement of “false science” i.e. scientific materialism that refuses to acknowledge the existence of true mind. False science extrapolates to the whole cosmos “good science” that is applicable only to certain regions of space and time when specific conditions apply.

The Will to Actualisation is a revolutionary concept. From this, everything else flows. The Will to Actualisation is a ceaseless longing and yearning, an unstoppable craving and striving. What we call “desire” is the Will to Actualisation in its basic state. Without desire nothing can happen. It is no mistake that the Buddhists conceive of the death of desire as a precondition for attaining nirvana. Schopenhauer has been accused of misunderstanding nirvana for linking it to complete nothingness – to non-existence and the total extinguishing of the will. In fact, it is hard to see how it could possibly be interpreted as anything else. To not desire is to literally not exist, yet such a state is impossible since desire is the arche that can never be created or destroyed.

The Will to Actualisation, this unquenchable desire to attain higher states, has several inevitable consequences. How does it go about attaining these higher states? How does it know it has attained them?

Slowly but surely the Will to Actualisation results in something truly wondrous – the birth of reason. Reason is the basis of planning and order. Ordered states can lead to states of higher order whereas perfectly random, chaotic states will always stay perfectly random and chaotic. Reason (order, planning, logic, the Logos), is something that emerges inexorably from the Will to Actualisation. And the core language of reason is none other than mathematics. The Will to Actualisation was guaranteed to create mathematics as its central tool for imposing order, organisation and form on itself. Without mathematics, the Will to Actualisation could never have become anything. To achieve higher states there must be an ordering and organisation of states, and mathematics is the quintessence of order, organisation and pattern.

But mathematics on its own is insufficient. How can mathematics allow a judgement of what represents a higher state? Is a row of sixes more or less ordered than a column of fives? Is a circle better than an ellipse? How would a mathematical mind “know” that it had achieved something better than before?

Two other factors are necessary:

1) Intuition. A mind must intuitively grasp that one state is higher than another, that it offers more potential, that it is associated with greater power. Intuition is a glimpse of the future. It is an instinctive understanding of what the completed project will look like. It is intuition that offers the scope for incredible short cuts. Intuition, inspiration and enlightenment are similar in conception – they offer a dazzling flash of the telos – the desired end: God fully actualised. No one is closer to Godliness than the most intuitive amongst us.

2) Feeling. Some things make us feel “good” and others “bad”. Some things cause us pleasure and others pain. Some things make us feel we have increased our power, others that we have lost power. It is these emotional judgements that allow us to cut through endless mathematical patterns. Scientists studying facial recognition using computers have discovered that their best computerised attempts can’t come anywhere near the speed and efficiency of humans who can recognise familiar faces instantly.

Computerised facial recognition software has the task of matching a new photograph that someone inputs into the system with one of an enormous number of photographs of people stored in its database. To test for a match, the software has to laboriously measure all sorts of facial distances and angles and skin tones, eye colours, hair patterns and textures etc. One of the reasons why humans are so much better is that they have an emotional response to faces. They might find them attractive or ugly, for instance. If they know the person, recognition is instantaneous. Why? Because we’re hardwired for faces. They are amongst the most significant things in our life. We have to recognise our mother’s face, our father’s, our siblings’, those of our friends, enemies, lovers, strangers etc. We absorb far more information from a person’s face than we do from what they say. People interviewing you for a job pay far more attention to your appearance than to what you say. Your accent and tone of voice are much more important than the content. You could be Einstein himself and yet if you have a broad, ill-educated accent someone may judge you the village idiot. Feeling, not reason, rules such choices.

Computers, as tools that execute endless mathematical instructions but which have absolutely no intuition or feelings, can never match us. To make artificial intelligences smarter than we are, you would have to work out how to instil emotion and intuition into them. You would need to make them desire and care about things. You would need to make them love and hate, to experience pleasure and pain. But if you succeeded in doing that, they would replace us!

Humans are not machines. We are not computers. We have a mathematical processor at our core, and the whole cosmos is mathematical, yet mathematics does not define us. We have a feeling processor too, and an intuition processor – these are what raise us above automata. To put it another way, we have God inside us. We have the Will to Actualisation burning within our hearts. How could a computer distinguish between Beethoven and muzak? It couldn’t. It would analyse the respective music into waves, amplitudes, frequencies etc but it would never experience the music. It would never feel it from the inside.

Scientific materialism is a Cartesian project that treats human beings as automata. But that’s not what we are. We are alive. We feel. We dream. We hope. We aspire. We lust. We love. We long for things. Automata do none of these things. One of the reasons why we can dismiss Abrahamism is that it treats us as creations. We are not. We are eternal. We are the same stuff as the universe in its primordial form. Robots are our creations. They are dead. The reason for that is that they are artificial, containing our limited understanding of the arche rather than naturally reflecting it.

It is impossible for us to program a human-like robot. If we wanted to create realistic androids, we would have to subject them to the only process that can capture the arche – evolution. Schopenhauer said that music is a direct copy of the primordial Will, hence why it affects us so profoundly. But there is something else that is a direct copy of the Will – evolution. What does evolution seek to accomplish? – creatures that will, that desire, that want to convert potential into actualisation.

We are the arche. We are its expression. We are taking it higher and higher, to ever-greater levels of actualisation. The process can end at all only one point – divinity. We are all becoming God. We carry God within us. If you could glimpse your innermost core you would be gazing at God himself. That is why the Abrahamist religions are so disgusting. They try to alienate us from what is holiest in us. They try to estrange us from our own Godliness.

To talk of “life” appearing in the cosmos is totally wrong. The cosmos is intrinsically alive. What we actually mean by “life” is when mind succeeds in animating matter. It took eons before the unconscious cosmic mind was finally able to bind itself to its own creation – matter – in a way that gave it more than just mathematical control of matter (more than just the laws of physics, in other words). It is that binding that is named life. Life is what you get when an individual mind (a soul) has planted itself inside matter, bringing desire, emotion and intuition to a limited segment of the material world. Often, life may be barely expressed, as in a plant, but when you bear in mind that a banana is said to have 30% of its DNA in common with a human, you can begin to understand that life is just a spectrum, of which we are at the higher end and plants the lower.

Artificial intelligence can never be real life because it lacks those crucial elements of desire, emotion and intuition. It lacks the evolutionary expression of the primeval Will. To make artificial life real you would have to give it a soul. Do you know any computer programmer who knows how to code a soul?

Plato divided the soul into three: the reasoning part, the feeling/spirited part and the desiring part. Had he added intuition he would have had a complete description of the Will to Actualisation. The Will to Actualisation begins as pure desire and striving, with an evolving intuitive notion of where it wants to go. It acquires reason, logic and planning via mathematics, then acquires feeling as a means of judging between alternatives.

Nietzsche’s “Will to Power” is effectively identical to the Will to Actualisation. Walter Kaufmann wrote, “Nietzsche was a dialectical monist. His basic force, the will to power, is not only the Dionysian passionate striving, akin to Schopenhauer’s irrational will, but is also Apollonian and possesses an inherent capacity to give itself form.” Here we have all of the right ingredients – Dionysian desire, passion and emotion and Apollonian order, organisation and reason, both driven by the dialectic of becoming, and guided by an intuitive teleology of increasing power.

The simplest way to think of the cosmos is as a dialectical, evolutionary process for converting potential into actuality. All you need to create a universe is mental, dimensionless energy infused with the Will to Actualisation. From that, everything else follows. The system pulls itself up by its own bootstraps. It creates itself and perfects itself. Science treats energy as some sterile, mindless, neutral substance, but it is no such thing. Energy is alive. Not in the sense in which we understand it, but as its indispensable precursor. It is only because energy is evolving, releasing more and more of its potential dialectically, that life evolved. The quality of energy is always dialectically improving.

Marxists argued that the laws that govern matter are not mechanistic but dialectical (hence the description of Marxists as dialectical materialists). Although no one ever says so, this is a much better way of viewing science than traditional mechanistic scientific materialism. Marxists do not agree with scientific materialists that only matter exists. Rather, they say that mind is the highest product of matter, and that matter is dialectically trying to generate more and more mind. Dialectical materialism asserts that one of the fundamental laws of existence is that quantity (matter) is dialectically transformed into quality (mind). Dialectical materialism is thus extremely closely related to alchemy: transforming base matter into the “gold” of the highest spirit.

Although Marx believed he was inverting Hegel’s philosophy, he was actually much closer to Hegel than he imagined. Hegel’s position was idealistic rather than materialistic i.e. mind precedes matter; matter is a product of mind rather than mind being a product of matter. The Big Bang can be explained in Hegelian terms (matter emerges from mind) but not in Marxist terms (matter comes from nothing at all). Of course, neither Hegel nor Marx had ever heard of the term “Big Bang” but there can be no doubt that Big Bang theory is a triumphant vindication and indeed almost proof of the correctness of Hegel’s philosophy.

For Hegel, mind creates matter and then, through material existence (the world of space and time), is able to attain self-consciousness and ultimately reach its highest state – Absolute Knowledge and Absolute Mind. Matter is the necessary state of alienation that mind must go through on its journey to its Omega Point. It is dialectically imperative that mind should create matter. But Marx’s position effectively becomes the same as Hegel’s once the material world exists. Marx asserts that matter is dialectically trying to reach its highest state – mind, and Hegel asserts that mind is dialectically trying to attain its highest state through matter. Either way, both positions maintain that the highest expression of mind is the dialectical culmination of existence. Hence the difference at this level becomes a matter of semantics.

Hegel and Marx are both advocates of the transformation, the alchemical transmutation, of quantity into quality, the impure into the pure, the unfashioned into the sculpted, potential into actuality, the lowest quality into the highest. Any view of human beings should reflect this same scope for our transformation into higher states and, at last, into none other than God, the Omega Point of the dialectic. Marxist dialectical science is a much better way of thinking about Darwinian evolution than traditional mechanistic science. It is impossible to conceive of how any mechanistic processes could lead to life, mind and consciousness. How can free will be mechanistic?

But the concept of matter striving to generate mind in a dialectical rather than mechanistic manner provides a more productive perspective. Mechanistic processes are anti-mind; dialectical processes are pro-mind.

Energy, fundamentally, is Will. How could it be otherwise? Nothing would happen without will. If you had no will you wouldn’t get out of bed. A computer has no will. It has no urge to switch itself on. Only Will drives things forward and makes things happen. Most of the time it operates unconsciously, following the path of least resistance – the laws of science – and can often seem to be inert and inanimate (like the computer) but eventually it can express itself more meaningfully. It can attain the condition of free will. We, humanity, already display this divine quality, although precious few of us use it properly. Nevertheless, we are the living proof that energy – which can be neither created nor destroyed – can transform itself into higher states. Energy can make itself conscious. Consciousness is the highest quality of energy. Maximum consciousness is God.

We human beings are still in thrall to enormous unconscious forces, but when we attain gnosis, we will have achieved the Omega Point of energy’s journey from potential to actualisation. Energy is not “stuff” – it is self-transformative will. There is only one thing capable of learning and improving itself – mind. Therefore, energy, when properly understood, is mind. Just as we have a will to do things, so does pure mind. It is will that powers the mind to higher and higher states. We call this process the dialectic. It is a learning process that gains knowledge via the path of contradiction.

Thesis, antithesis and synthesis – over and over again, attaining higher and higher states. That is how you go from maximum potential to maximum actualisation. There is no other way. Mechanistic processes cannot lead you anywhere. No scientist has ever understood the true nature of energy – that it is actually wilful mind. When you grasp that, you have grasped the fundamental nature of existence.
__________

The Three Universes II:

When all’s said and done, it’s remarkably easy to analyse the cosmos we see around us. There are only three ways by which it could have reached its present state, two of which are concerned with God, and the third of which avoids God, as we’ve just described. It’s worthwhile going through them again, from a slightly different angle. The cosmos was created by an external, eternal, perfect being (God). This is the Abrahamist view. We have a perfect starting point – God – and then we go downhill from then on because God’s creation is less perfect than he is. It’s odd that people should subscribe to this stance of cosmic anti-evolution. And why would God himself want to create imperfection when he could make do with his perfect self?

God’s “love” becomes a love of imperfection rather than of perfection. He loves us because we are necessarily inferior to him. In other words, this isn’t love at all, but domination and bullying. Read the Abrahamist texts – they are all about a tyrant dictating to abject slaves, and the slaves are supposed to put up with it because God says so. The Catholic Catechism asks, “Why did God make me?” and the answer is “To love, serve and obey him.” That sums up the situation perfectly – the most one-sided contract you could over get. It’s the creed of the master, and no self-respecting person could ever endure such an unequal relationship.

Just as odd as Abrahamism is scientific materialism. This asserts that the cosmos sprang out of nothing 14 billion years ago in a huge burst of energy, and the useful energy has been running down ever since and will eventually reach a zero state where the cosmos will have suffered “heat death” and be frozen forever, incapable of doing a single thing. You simply couldn’t get a more grim, nihilistic, pointless and purposeless vision of existence than this. Along the way, according to this view, atoms of matter jostle with each other and interact in various ways. Amidst all of the random jostlings, life, mind and consciousness emerge for no apparent reason and via a completely unknown mechanism (voodoo perhaps!). However, these serve no purpose and are just curious phenomena, nothing else. Like the cosmos itself, we will perish and the material atoms of which we are composed will suffer heat death along with everything else.

If you don’t believe in the perfect Creator fashioning the imperfect cosmos out of nothing, and you don’t believe in the cosmos springing out of nothing without the help of any Creator and then just randomly running down its energy in a series of utterly pointless and mindless interactions then you are left with the truth: the cosmos is not created. It has always existed and will always exist. It can never not exist. It goes through great cyclic Ages as it explores every conceivable possibility. The basic stuff of existence is wilful, purposeful energy – mind/spirit (Geist to use Hegel’s word) – that strives to turn all possibilities into actualities. It does so eternally. When it has exhausted one Age of all of its possibilities, it commits “divine suicide” and begins again. This cosmic adventure can never end.

A number of perceptive individuals have written to us to point out that there’s something horrific about this stance since it amounts, in the final analysis, to a type of eternal recurrence, resembling the endless task of Sisyphus pushing the boulder up the hill only to see it always fall.

Eternal Recurrence comes in several varieties. In the Groundhog Day version, for example, you are free to do whatever you like within a restricted, repeating scenario. In the Sisyphean version, the scenario repeats and the actions you perform repeat, but each repetition is always slightly different from the one before – you push the boulder up the hill differently; you come back down the hill differently. In the strictest interpretation of Nietzsche’s version of eternal recurrence, your life is repeated identically an infinite number of times.

In terms of cosmic eternal recurrence, the same scenario of maximum potential being converted to maximum actualisation happens an infinite number of times, but the events experienced are different every time round, meaning that there is infinite variety within a repeating scenario i.e. the scenario eternally recurs, not the events within the scenario, which are always different. In an infinite system with infinite possibilities, there can never be identical repetition of the Nietzschean kind, hence the future remains completely undetermined. The general pattern it will take is nevertheless fully known, and is inescapable.

The cosmos cannot do anything else. There are no ways out in an infinite system. If God is eternal, what keeps him excited and stimulated after ten zillion trillion years? Hasn’t he seen and done everything? Isn’t he bored to death, so to speak? He experiences nothing but constant repetition. Or what about the cosmic heat death? – a universe frozen for eternity. What’s good about that? The universe cannot do anything other than go from potential to the perfection of complete actualisation, and then start again. It cannot stand still.

It cannot endure eternal perfection because it encounters the ultimate cosmic stumbling block – boredom. Boredom is, arguably, the most important aspect of existence, the factor that subverts perfection itself. How can any mind stave off boredom when it has resolved every problem? You start to realise something incredible about the universe. It does strange things and seems to operate in a baffling and enigmatic way precisely in order to defeat boredom.

The Hindu concept of Maya – illusion – is invaluable. If you were God and had experienced perfection for eons, and were now utterly bored by yet another day of glorious flawlessness, wouldn’t you create a force whose function was to attempt to deceive you, to puzzle you… to entertain you? One way or another, God allows evil to exist, he allows confusion, pain, suffering and bewilderment to exist because if none of these things existed, life would not be endurable. The highest wisdom is this – boredom trumps morality. In an infinite system – a system that literally cannot end – the issue of how to escape boredom becomes paramount. Indeed it is the only issue. The universe that cycles endlessly from potential to actualisation, reaching an Omega Point of perfection and then starting again is the optimal solution to counteracting boredom in eternity. There is no alternative, like it or not.

Isn’t it strange that in a mortal system, fear of death is paramount, but in an immortal system, fear of deathlessness replaces it? How will you cope with an existence that can never end no matter what you do? You are like Bill Murray’s character in Groundhog Day when it seemed that he was trapped forever in a loop; not even killing himself offered release. But looking at it another way, in this system you get to experience perfection an infinite number of times, and isn’t that the most desirable outcome infinity can confer?

What do you fear most? Death or deathlessness? There’s no inbetween. Would you prefer eternal oblivion or the impossibility of oblivion? Death takes your life against your will. Deathlessness prevents you ever exiting life even if you want to. “You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave,” as the Eagles put it in Hotel California.

You see, we are fully jacked in to the zero-infinity system. If we are mortal, our lives are zero compared with infinity, hence what’s the point? If we are immortal, we are the children of infinity and zero can never be truly ours. Yet zero is absolutely ours because only zero – dimensionlessness – is outside space and time, outside mortality. No matter what, we can never escape from zero and infinity. They define us, just as they define everything. Zero and infinity set the bounds for dimensionality and mortality, but they themselves are outside dimensionality and mortality.

Consider the Abrahamic concepts of heaven and hell. Catholics talk about gazing upon the Beatific Vision in Paradise. Yet how long could you gaze upon anything? Doesn’t a time come when it bores you to tears? Imagine an eternity spent staring at the Mona Lisa. How long would it be before it became nauseating to you, the most unbearable thing you could ever conceive? You would give anything not to have to look at it one second longer.

As for hell, imagine you had been tortured in every conceivable way for a trillion years. But you still have an infinite sentence left. You always have an infinite sentence left no matter how much times elapses. There are no new torments for the demons to devise for you. They’ve exhausted all of their ideas. So, would there come a time when you begged your torturers to find a new way to torture you because you were so bored with all of the other tortures that had been done to you umpteen times before? You realise that even the demons are bored to tears.

You are bored, and your demons are bored. The Devil is bored. And this must continue forever. Even worse, you are totally desensitised to pain. You can’t feel anything anymore. None of the tortures cause you any physical distress at all now. Once you’ve been burned for a million years, you no longer feel the flames. In fact you crave the days when you once screamed out, because at least you felt something. Now you are perpetually numb. And exactly the same is true in heaven. All pleasures, all delights, have become mind-numbingly tedious. God is even more bored than the Devil.

Heaven and hell, God and Satan have merged into one. They are the collective expression of Absolute Boredom!!! Pleasure and pain have lost all meaning. The souls in heaven crave the tortures of hell just so that they can have a new experience. They start to wonder whether they are the ones in hell and if God was Satan all along to have inflicted so much despair on them. Ironic, isn’t it? As soon as you truly contemplate living forever you realise that you will have to confront not the horror of dying, but the horror of not dying! And with crystal clarity all of the puzzles of existence are solved.

Life is spectacularly mysterious for the simple reason that it has to be in order to stave off boredom. WE, all of us, have created this system. We don’t remember, and that’s the whole point. We devised a system that would save us from eternal tedium. We created Maya to spin illusions and puzzles for us so that we could avoid learning the truth too quickly.

The Will to Actualisation suffers from a critical design flaw. It cannot stop. Not ever. It always desires and that desire can never be quenched. Not even perfection tames it. Desire has a monstrous flipside – boredom. When desires are not being fulfilled, boredom emerges, and desire then craves something to fill the vacuum.

Boredom is the driver that keeps whipping desire along. If you are not in a state of desire then you are in a state of boredom, which can only be cured by new desires. One way or another, the system keeps moving forward. There is no stop button. Schopenhauer was the philosopher who took this melancholy realisation to its most extreme extent and declared existence inherently evil. Happiness and satisfaction are impossible, he said. When you achieve any ambition it gives you but momentary pleasure. Almost instantly, you set new goals and have to start all over again. If you can’t think of a new objective, you succumb to boredom and that will then force you to new activity. There’s no way out. No priests, rabbis and imams ever talk about these most fundamental questions. Why not? A) They don’t understand them and B) It would ruin their infantile understanding of the world.

According to Abrahamists, you get one brief mortal life which decides your fate for a subsequent immortal life in heaven or hell (what’s remotely fair and just about that? – about the actions you perform in three score years and ten settling your eternal future, with no right of appeal?). No Abrahamist ever considers what you will be thinking and feeling once you have experienced heaven or hell for a zillion trillion years and still have eternity stretching before you. No Abrahamist ever considers one of the defining characteristics of the human mind or indeed of any conscious mind – the certainty of being bored by repetition and the craving for novelty.

Remember, to become God you must ponder the questions that God has to confront, the greatest of which is how to live with infinity. To learn to affirm it and love it. When you say YES to life, you are saying yes to infinity, and to everything that implies.

As usual, Nietzsche grasped these issues better than any theologian: ‘What if a demon crept after you one day or night in your loneliest solitude and said to you: “This life, as you live it now and have lived it, you will have to live again and again, times without number; and there will be nothing new in it, but every pain and every joy and every thought and sigh and all the unspeakably small and great in your life must return to you, and everything in the same series and sequence – and in the same way this spider and this moonlight among the trees, and in the same way this moment and I myself. The eternal hourglass of existence will be turned again and again – and you with it, you dust of dust!” – Would you not throw yourself down and gnash your teeth and curse the demon who thus spoke? Or have you experienced a tremendous moment in which you would have answered him: “You are a god and never did I hear anything more divine!” If this thought gained power over you it would, as you are now, transform and perhaps crush you; the question in all and everything: “do you want this again and again, times without number?” would lie as the heaviest burden upon all of your actions.

Or how well disposed towards yourself and towards life would you have to become to have no greater desire than this for the ultimate eternal sanction and seal?’

The cyclical cosmos, reincarnating itself eternally in order to go from absolute potential to absolute perfection an infinite number of times is the ONLY rational answer of how to cope with deathlessness. And once you have got used to the idea then, like Nietzsche’s Superman, you will find yourself affirming this reality and declaring this the most divine news possible. You will achieve perfection not just once but an infinite number of times – and if that’s not the definition of a perfect existence then what is?

******

A mind desires. It needs a way to know if it is getting closer or further from what it desires and it uses pleasure and pain, the basis of emotion. To plan, it needs logic and reason. Mathematics is the element that underlies logic and reason. Mathematics is also the ground of law, order, organisation and pattern. Hence desire necessarily generates both emotion and reason. Music can be thought of as both reason and emotion. Mathematics provides the rational form while the content conveys the emotion. Without the form, the content could not exist.

Fundamentally, as Pythagoras perceived, we belong to a cosmos filled with music, for which one day we will have the ears. We will listen to the cosmic orchestra playing the sublime music of the spheres, and nothing will ever have sounded better. Music to make you cry, music to make you die.
__________

4/10

Religion, judged by the consequences it has had for humanity, is more like the work of the Devil than of God. It has generated legions of zombies, so brainwashed they will kill people in the name of their supposedly merciful, peaceful, loving, forgiving, compassionate God. It’s time to face the grimmest of facts: religion is evil. Or, rather, the religions that have assumed dominance in the world are evil. They succeeded precisely because they are evil. They are Satan’s work, his instruments for imposing his will on humanity. Isn’t that the most credible interpretation of the religious history of the world? Is Jerusalem the city of God or the capital of hell?

Religion is a system of mind control. It’s time to reclaim it and make it what it was intended to be – humanity’s greatest gift. The main religions make no sense. Frankly, they are absurd. That could perhaps be overlooked if they had succeeded in making the world a better place, a paradise. But they haven’t even though they’ve had thousands of years to do so. They claim to teach love, peace and being generous and helpful towards others, so where is the New Eden? Where is the Golden Age? Where are justice, peace and prosperity for all? And since these religions haven’t delivered, why haven’t they been replaced by something more effective? Why do people cling to failure?

This is a wicked world filled with war, greed and intolerance. Fanatical suicide bombers murder innocents in the name of their God. Surely they mean Satan. Don’t we detect the smell of sulphur emanating from these people?

The main religions serve only one purpose: to control your behaviour and make you their slave. They try to dictate to you every second of the day with their inflexible dogmas, commandments and rules. They have proved immensely valuable to the powerful, rich and corrupt. The mainstream religions and the Old World Order work hand in hand to make our lives miserable. Isn’t it time we wised up? If the main religions aren’t benefiting us, isn’t it time to change them to ones that do?

The pagans of ancient Greece and Rome fought political but never religious wars. They didn’t wage jihads and crusades. They didn’t excommunicate people and burn them at the stake for religious transgressions. They didn’t martyr themselves in the name of Zeus and Jupiter. The only ancient nation that engaged in explicit holy war was (surprise, surprise) Israel. The Hebrews exterminated the Canaanites in the name of their God. They even claimed that their God accompanied them into battle in the Ark of the Covenant. So much for love and peace.

The Greeks, Egyptians and Romans had many gods. When they conquered other countries, they frequently absorbed the gods of the vanquished into their own pantheon. In religious terms, they were for the most part extremely tolerant and open-minded. Their pagan religions offered great freedom, inspiration, ecstatic moments and a variety of routes to exploring and experiencing the divine. There were no fierce, bearded prophets, no holy scriptures claiming to be the true word of God, no Inquisitions to eradicate heretics. These pagan religions understood that humans are diverse, while the Abrahamic religions demand slavish conformity.

The God of Abrahamism is usually pictured as an old and bearded man living in the sky, suitably invisible in normal circumstances, constantly staring into your mind and ready to send you to hell if you violate his rules. Of course, all the followers of other religions go straight to hell, yet although he sends these people to a place of eternal suffering, he still loves YOU. This perfect, universal God apparently has a favourite race: his “Chosen People”. Why? Did he create only a small percentage of the world’s population? If not, why does he reject the rest of the human race? And if this perfect, all-powerful being who created us didn’t want us to commit “sins”, then we wouldn’t be able to, would we? So clearly, he wants us to sin so that he can then punish us for our transgressions. He gets off on it. He’s a sadist, a torturer.

It’s also strange that his holy texts, given to us in his own, infallible words (supposedly), are so badly written, so hard to understand, so heavily coded and, even worse, so full of inconsistencies and illogicalities that they are quite beyond belief. Come on, a perfect God should be able to articulate clearly what he wants from us, shouldn’t he?

If this God is perfect, why is he so jealous, cruel and violent (the Old Testament reads like the adventures of a psychopath – read it for yourself and you’ll be appalled)? Does he really desire slavish worship by dumb, bowing humans eternally reciting holy texts like mindless parrots? Most of us would be bored to tears by constantly hearing the same uninspiring prayers. Why does God find it so exciting?

What about so-called tolerance? Christianity wasn’t spread by love, but by fire and sword. Muslims are ordered to kill Christians and Jews. Jews think God chose them, though he seems to disagree judging by millennia of expulsions, pogroms and persecutions, culminating in the Holocaust!

So, one question can’t be avoided. Isn’t “God” an impostor? Isn’t he the Father of Lies who has pulled off the most daring impersonation in history?

Ladies and gentlemen, let us introduce you to Satan, the great deceiver. Who else could be behind the millennia of carnage carried out in the name of “God”? As soon as you understand that it was Satan all along, everything becomes crystal clear. The Gnostics saw the truth millennia ago. Why has everyone else been so slow on the uptake?

Satan loves conflict, war, intolerance, hunger, pain, suffering and everything else we have had inflicted on us by religious fanatics. That’s the God of the Christians, Jews and Muslims for you! The Eastern religions’ Devil is the toxic doctrine of karma that gave birth to the abominable Hindu caste system and the idea that we are being punished for sins committed in previous existences. Now do you understand why the world is so wicked, so full of suffering and misery? Humanity has been worshipping the wrong guy. The God most people pray to is the Devil.

It’s time we left behind these monstrous, false religions of Satan. Let’s turn to a religion of reason, hope and freedom that celebrates the True God, not Satan. Let’s turn to Illuminism: the religion of light, the religion of enlightenment. What is the purpose of religion? It is to provide answers to the profoundest questions such as: What is the meaning of life? Who created the world? Why does evil exist?

No one needs temples, churches, priests and rabbis for any of that.
__________

Islam – the Dark Ages:

“In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.” Would you stone a couple of young lovers to death? Could there ever be any legitimate religious reason for killing lovers who have done no harm to anyone? No? Muslims think differently. In video footage that shocked the world www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKWrTRw8fSE a large crowd of Afghani Muslims was seen stoning a young woman standing in the middle of her own grave, dressed in a blue burqa so that none of her features could be seen. When she attempted to crawl out of the hole dug for her, she was finished off with gunshots. Her male lover was then brought out and the vicious mob quickly finished him off with their stones. Is Islam a religion or a psychosis? How can anyone who kills lovers say that they believe in a most merciful God? More like the Devil. Islam is a time machine for taking badly educated people 1400 years into the past where they can live like primitive tribes people, cut off from modernity. No one does this to Muslims. They do it to themselves.

The Jewish religion is much older than Islam, but the Jews have mostly stayed in touch with modernity. In fact, they have often been the vanguard of new thinking. There are precious few Jews in comparison with the number of Muslims and yet the Jews have had an almost infinitely greater impact on cultural and intellectual life than the Muslims. Why? Because they have respected education. The Koran, on the other hand, is a book of anti-education.

Here is some drivel by an extremist Islamic Jihadist group called The Truth Army.

Bringing you Truth videos from all over the world to enlighten the masses, fight against ignorance, and destroy the NWO. 9/11 was a satanic Illuminati freemasonic ritual to usher in the NWO, which is comprised of 2 parts:

1. War against Islamic Sharia being implemented as a political system.

2. War against freedom, sovereignty, and prosperity of all of humanity.

The satanic Illuminati dominate several aspects including banking, political, military, media, and economic spheres of influence worldwide.

They are currently destroying the Western world and finalizing the shift of economic power over to the East, specifically China. China is already a model NWO state due to the atheistic nature of the government and totalitarian control of the people.

The long-term goal for the world is massive population reduction through wars, famines, disease, sterilization, abortion, and other means to destroy humanity which the dark Illuminati do in order to please their master, Satan / Shaytan / the Devil. They wish to hasten on the arrival of their awaited one, the Antichrist / False Messiah / The Deceiver, because in their corrupted belief system they believe that they will become supreme and immortal beings by doing this great evil in the world.

They are deceived, and are the worst of mankind. They will have their punishment in the Next Life, and will have no refuge from The Creator of the worlds. The only way to achieve victory against the lies, death, and corruption of the satanic Illuminati is through Truth, Life, and Justice.

The masses of humanity must be educated as to who the true enemy is. We must know ourselves as well as the enemy so that we may effectively fight and destroy the NWO Antichrist system. The time has come to unite all of humanity against the forces of darkness to destroy them if we wish to ensure our own survival.

Educate each other
Unite on all levels
Stand up for the world and future generations

There are more than enough resources in the world for everyone and much more. The death mentality of the Illuminati promotes scarcity, ignorance, and wars, while the righteous people of the world promote wealth, knowledge, wisdom, peace, science, and prosperity.

The Victory of the Righteous Believers is Written.

The God-fearing people of the world shall achieve Success in this life and The Next.

All Power is with God, The Creator of all the worlds.
All Praise is due to Allah.
Peace to the Truthful Ones.
Peace to The Truth Army.

******

Note how this almost exactly matches the rhetoric and analysis of the anarcho-capitalist “Truthers”, and how it inverts the truth in virtually every conceivable way. The Truth Army want to impose Sharia Law on everyone and “unite” the planet under the totalitarian, brainwashed ideology of Islamic Fundamentalism. An Islamic world would be even worse than the present world controlled by the OWO. In fact, it’s hard to conceive of an Islamic-ruled world as being in any way distinguishable from hell.

Muslims don’t want a New World Order for the simple reason that they seek to drag humanity back to the ignorance and savagery of the deserts of Arabia of 1400 years ago. The explicit agenda of Jihadists is to implement, at the point of the sword, gun, improvised explosive device and bomb-belt, global Sharia Law, kill all infidels, apostates, atheists, agnostics, skeptics, freethinkers, blasphemers, homosexuals, heretics, and stone to death any young lovers who have flouted the wishes of their extremist families.

It’s actually pointless to attempt to engage in any rational debate with these people. They are brainwashed beyond any hope of redemption. They will never progress. The problem is how to live in peaceful co-existence with them when they are committed to violently imposing Islam on the rest of the world, just as their Prophet was a savage man steeped in blood who waged savage war against all non- Mohammedans.

This is one of the greatest dilemmas imaginable. Every country in Europe has seen the rise of right-wing parties and the reason is always the same – they want to prevent illiberal Muslims from backward countries coming to Europe and infecting Europe with their ignorance and fanaticism. This is not a racial issue, but purely religious and cultural. Hindus have had no difficulties in integrating in European countries. Hindus who come to Europe are typically smart, liberal, open-minded, tolerant, and happy to befriend and mix with the Europeans. Muslims, on the other hand, refuse to integrate. The only reason they come to Europe is to partake of the higher standard of living. They actively hate Europeans and openly say that all Europeans will go to hell unless they convert to Islam.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s formula for dealing with those who insist on placing their particular will over the General Will was that they must be “forced to be free”. Anyone who aspires to govern a country must be able to take hard decisions. As a tolerant, rational person, how would you deal with the intolerant and the irrational, those who wave an extremist book in your face which, they say, they are commanded to obey on pain of death?

Muslims, Orthodox Jews, Christian Fundamentalists, anarcho-capitalists and the dynastic elites such as the Rothschilds would never accept any of the Rebooting Laws. They would fight to the death to prevent them being implemented. They are stuck in the past.

No healthy State would permit babies to be attacked and genitally mutilated. If an adult wants to be circumcised, that’s his business, but a baby gives no consent, hence must be defended by the law of the land from being circumcised merely to gratify the beliefs of others. A baby has absolute human rights, and foremost amongst those is the right not to be made a human sacrifice in order to satisfy “God” (i.e. Abraham had no right to take his son’s life no matter who ordered him to do so), nor to be genitally mutilated or physically attacked in any way for the sake of “God”.

In the Bible, it is clear that “God” decrees that no human being has any rights whatever. He allegedly exterminated 99.999% of the human race in the Great Flood. When the Nazis killed six million Jews, they were indicted for waging aggressive war, for war crimes and crimes against humanity. When God almost wiped out humanity, not a single indictment was brought against him. Why not? If “God” contravenes the Declaration of Human Rights, shouldn’t he be put on trial just as the Nazis were? This is a fundamental issue because it relates directly to how religious parents treat their children.

All religious parents think that God has an absolute right to kill anyone, no questions asked. Why? Because he is the “Creator”. These same parents think they have the absolute right to kill and mutilate their children, just as if they were God, because, in relation to their children, they are the Creators. So, in Pakistan and many other Islamic countries, “honour” killings are rife. Anyone (usually teenage girls) who shames their family by having an affair, a romance, not agreeing to a forced marriage, marrying someone inappropriate etc, forfeits their life and is murdered, usually by their father, brother or uncle.

Jewish and Muslim parents automatically subject their baby sons to genital mutilation. Religious parents think they have the unquestionable right to brainwash their children into believing the same things that they do. Well, do they have such a right? Is it consistent with human rights? Isn’t it time all religions were placed on trial and explicitly challenged under human rights legislation? Isn’t it time monarchs were put on trial to determine whether they have any right to refer to human beings as their “subjects”?

We live in an absurd world where contradictory laws are allowed to co-exist. Either we have a constitution and a rule of law or we don’t. If we do then no one can be exempt, and that includes religions and monarchs. “God” himself is not above the law. If there is a commandment saying, “Thou shalt not kill”, why isn’t “God” subject to it, especially since he claims to be loving, forgiving, merciful, peace loving, and compassionate? If “God” has the right to kill human beings no questions asked then we are his worthless, disposable slaves and he is a tyrant. If we are not slaves then he has no right to dispense with our lives as he sees fit.
__________

The Black Holocaust:

What is the greatest crime in human history? It concerns precisely this issue of slavery versus absolute human rights.

A book called The Black Holocaust for Beginners by S. E. Anderson estimates that 100 million Africans died as a direct result of the slave trade and slavery. Who were the slave traders? They were Christians and Muslims (and Jews supported slavery too).

Here are some of the comments posted on Amazon about this book.

The information was priceless. It hurt my soul and brought me to tears to know that people who claim to follow God walk so casually in the footsteps of Satan. The cruelty inflicted on innocent men, women and children was incredible. It speaks volumes about the spiritual depravity of the European and Arabian people that they could allow and participate in such atrocities. Our children and children all over the earth must read this book so that they will know, so that they will never forget, and so the human family will never allow this to occur ever again.

Anderson and Holley rightly tackle a topic that deserves study. However, they de-emphasize the well-developed Islamic slave trade that kidnapped more than 11 million Black Africans from their homes between 700 to 1900. This slave trade began centuries before the Atlantic trade and continued for centuries after.

Islamic scripture fully embraces the institution of human slavery. Mohammed left many instructions to slave owners. This express endorsement of human slavery by Mohammed accounts for the fact that human slavery was not abolished in Saudi Arabia until 1964 and not until 1968 in Kuwait. Islamic slavery was no less brutal than the Atlantic variety. Male slaves were routinely castrated and forced into military service. Female slaves become sexual servants whose children were not their own.

The systematic exploitation, enslavement and extermination of Africans in the Western Hemisphere dates from the start of the European slave trade around 1500 BCE to the conclusion of the American Civil War in 1865. The Black Holocaust killed millions of African human beings and is (because of the social prejudice and dehumanisation necessary to justify slavery) the most under-reported event in western history. The Black Holocaust for Beginners is an ideal introduction to this incredible human chronicle of suffering and is a “must” for every school and community library black studies and American history collection.

I’ve been reading everything “black” I could get my hands on since I started my awakening. I stumbled upon the Holocaust book in a small bookstore in Albuquerque, NM and had it read by that afternoon; I couldn’t put it down. I was so impacted upon by the pictures, particularly of Sister Translator hanging from her tongue because she could speak to many and because she dared to strike a white man. It was so very interesting to learn about the Arab slave trade, especially the current state of affairs regarding slavery in Mauritania and the Sudan. Of great interest to me was the numbers Mr. Anderson cites. My husband, who is also a Black activist, has said for year he felt there were 100-150 million involved; it’s easy to see there were really more than that. I applaud Mr. Anderson’s bravery in writing a book about things no one wants to hear. I was moved to tears. Thank you, Mr. Anderson and may the Lord of your Fathers richly bless your life for your contribution to the cause.

We hear endlessly about the Jewish Holocaust, and almost never about the Black Holocaust. Why not? Cui bono? The horrific treatment to which Africans were subjected was a direct consequence of Judaeo-Christian and Islamic beliefs. Africans were heathen infidels, hence destined for hell, hence fully deserving of whatever they got. If God had wanted them to be spared he would have made them People of the Book. Because he didn’t, he clearly wanted them to be slaves, and he placed zero value on their lives. Thus goes the logic of those who believe in a Satanic “God” who thinks nothing of exterminating the Canaanites, drowning the world and subjecting everyone to Original Sin, which means that they then merit eternal hellfire.

The Jewish Holocaust may be viewed in a similar light. Since Christianity asserts that all Jews are going to hell for rejecting Christ, why would there be anything wrong with stuffing them in death camps? They were the damned, just as the Africans were before them. At the Nuremberg Trials, Goering’s defence should have been that Christianity condemns all Jews to hell. All of the Christian prosecutors should have been asked on oath to say whether or not that they agreed that all Jews were hell-bound. If they did (as they would have to if they claimed to be Christian) then on what grounds were they condemning the Nazis for creating hell on earth for the Jews?

The Nazis were merely hastening God’s inevitable judgement. In a world of human rights, there would be no holocausts. Abrahamic religion creates holocausts. What do you expect from a religion that reveres a patriarch prepared to kill his own son in a holocaust? Abrahamism is a religion of murder, mutilation, brainwashing and slavery. It is completely unacceptable in any civilised world.

African Americans provide a crucial test of justice. Because of their history, they have never had easy access to capital in a society based on capital. They have been the victims of racial discrimination for centuries. They have typically been stuck in ghettos and given a poor education. Sport and entertainment have allowed a few to escape but for most there’s no way out. They have never been part of the elite. They have never benefited from privilege. They are not part of the magic circle. All of this gives them moral authority and makes them one of the logical groups to lead the New World Order.
__________

The Sacrifice:

The defining motif of the Abrahamic religions is that the Abrahamic “God” ordered Abraham to perform human sacrifice on his own son, and Abraham agreed. Abrahamist apologists try to explain this away by saying that God intended no harm to the boy. So, let’s test that hypothesis. Imagine the scene. Abraham heroically says to God, “I will never kill my son for you or anyone else. It’s an utterly monstrous and immoral suggestion. One would think you were the Devil rather than God to be able to give such a vile and evil order.”

Are we expected to believe that God would say, “No problem, Abe. I had no intention of letting your son die anyway, and I agree with you about the Devil thing. It was just a test. No biggie.” To which Abraham replies, “Thank God for that, if you’ll pardon the expression. I mean if I had agreed to kill my own son, I’d be a nut, wouldn’t I? And you’d be a nut for asking me to do it. We’d both be psychopaths, wouldn’t we? We’d be evil monsters. You’d be the Devil and I’d be the servant of evil. Obviously, you wanted to make sure that I would never be so deranged as to do something beyond depravity just because you ordered it, right?”

(The biggest tragedy in human history is that Abraham didn’t say this! Think of all the trouble we would have been spared.) God says, “Em, er….I guess so.” Abraham says, “So, what you’re really saying is that I needn’t slavishly obey you and I should exercise my own judgment at all times. I should be free to make up my own mind rather than doing what you say all the time. Right?” God says, “Uh, um, yes, well, I suppose so.” Abraham says, “What a great God you are. I don’t need to do everything you tell me. You’re never going to punish me. I love you. You’re the best. You have truly given me a Paradise to live in.” You think that’s how it would have gone down? Or how about what really would have happened?

God, with fire and brimstone pouring from every orifice, screams, “You dare to defy the Lord thy God?!!!! You have one instant to do what I ordered. If you don’t, I will kill you and your son this second and punish your souls in hell for eternity.” In other words, the story of Abraham is the story of divine Terrorism, with Jehovah the cosmic Terrorist. If Abraham had not been willing to obey orders, he would certainly have been killed, and his son too. His choice was simple – agree to kill his son or suffer eternal hellfire. What choice is that? What “God” forces someone to make such a choice? – only a Satanic God.

It is impossible to excuse Jehovah’s behaviour and his horrific order. To realise that you simply have to ask yourself what Jehovah would have done if Abraham had said no. Abrahamists have fled from that question because they know the answer. The story of Abraham is a very simple one. Abraham’s “God” says, “Obey me or die.” Abraham is allowed to live only if he is prepared to perform the ultimate crime of slaughtering his own child. Any other response would have resulted in his death and his being sentenced to eternal hell. So, what would you do?

What was it the Nazis said in their defence? “We were only obeying orders. If we didn’t we would be killed.” Isn’t that Abraham’s excuse too? We condemn the Nazis as monsters, yet half the world reveres Abraham and thinks he is a mouthpiece of God. How fucked is that? Abrahamism is nothing but the rule of Terror. In Abrahamism, a Terrorist deity demands absolute obedience. What reason do we have or not naming that deity Satan? How could he be any other? There is no conceivable Abrahamic defence. They are Devil worshippers, pure and simple. No good God would ever order anyone to make a human sacrifice of his son.

This “God” should be resisted, not worshipped. He is a monster, a deranged psychopath, the essence of Universal Terror. He does not ask you to worship him, he orders it. If you don’t do so, he kills you. If you do what he says, he promises you heaven, if you don’t, he vows to send you to hell. Where is the morality, the love, the compassion, the mercy, the forgiveness? They don’t exist. Abrahamism is basic Pavlovian conditioning based on punishment and reward.

Jehovah’s equation is the starkest and most brutal imaginable – obey or perish. And how does that differ from what Satan would say? In what way is it possible to distinguish Jehovah from Satan? In the Islamic version of the tale, it is Ishmael not Isaac who is to be sacrificed. Incredibly, the Muslims relate that Shaytan three times pleaded with Abraham to spare Ishmael’s life and three times Abraham violently drove him away by throwing stones at him. This event is “celebrated” every year at the Islamic Hajj.

Obviously, Shaytan didn’t go up to Abraham and say, “Hi, Abe, pleased to meet you – I’m Shaytan, the Prince of Darkness, the cosmic force of absolute evil.” So, Abraham didn’t KNOW it was Shaytan. He simply made that interpretation because a stranger was asking him to do the precise opposite of what Allah was commanding him to – to spare his son’s life rather than kill him! In fact, as the Father of Lies, wouldn’t Shaytan be far more likely to call himself something else? – Allah, for example! (The Satanic Verses controversy was all about Shaytan passing himself off as the Angel Gabriel in order to deceive Mohammed, so why couldn’t he go one better and pass himself off as God? – the ultimate deception.)

So, what we have is someone calling himself Allah demanding human sacrifice, and a stranger pleading with Abraham not to do it. Surely only a sick mind would side with “Allah” against the stranger. Abraham was unquestionably psychotic, with a lust for blood. He was more than happy to carry out the order, which why was he was picked in the first place.

If someone came up to you in the street, said he was God and ordered you to kill someone, and another person, a stranger, screamed at you not to do it, would you naturally believe the first guy, regard the stranger as Satan, and get your dagger out? That was Abraham’s view of the situation, and half of the modern world agree with him. And then these psychos wonder why the world is evil? It’s because of THEM. Allah orders Ishmael’s death and Shaytan begs for Ishmael’s life. Which one is good and which evil? Only a monster would be unable to give the right answer. Which are you? – a monster or a decent, moral human being?

Who would ever consider perpetrating human sacrifice just because someone calling himself “God” commanded it (where was the proof provided that Abraham’s God was what he claimed to be? – it’s simply stated as a fact, yet all the evidence of his behaviour points in the opposite direction). In the modern world, anyone who heard a voice in his head telling him to kill people would be instantly sectioned under the Mental Health Act. Isn’t it extraordinary that half the world think such a person is the prophet of God? The horrific suspicion must remain that Earth is the cosmic mental asylum, the dumping ground for the universe’s nutters. That would explain everything at a stroke, don’t you think?

Abrahamism – not a religion but a mental illness. The Abrahamists are the damned. They are the followers of the true Satan and the story of Abraham is the surest proof of that. No sane person could possibly wish to emulate Abraham and raise a dagger to slaughter his own flesh and blood. How could anyone ever have imagined that the “God” of Abraham was anyone other than Satan? Who but Satan would command his prophet to perform human sacrifice? Would the True God ever do something so sick, grotesque and perverse? The Abrahamists proclaim that it is your sacred duty to slavishly obey “God” no matter that he is ordering you to murder your own child. To mindlessly follow orders is an unimpeachable and unarguable “good”, they say. Is it? Or is Abrahamism the religion of those who abdicate all moral responsibility for their own actions and claim that it’s all the “will of God”? If it is, you might as well be a robot. You have no free will and you are not human.

Billions of humans have worshipped the Devil for millennia and that’s why the world is so fucked, as the Gnostics saw with startling clarity. Surely it’s time for humanity to turn to Abraxas, the True God of Light, Reason and Freedom. The religion of Abraxas has no holy texts, no fanatical prophets, no churches, temples, synagogues or mosques. There are no rules, commandments and regulations. There are no prayer books or hymns. There are no dress codes, no Sabbath days, no threats of eternal hellfire. There is no mutilation of babies, no brainwashing, no inbuilt intolerance.

Instead, there is true spirituality. There is the philosophical, scientific, mathematical, psychological, artistic and religious endeavour to maximise human potential, as driven by the cosmic dialectic. Human beings are pre-Gods. To worship Satan or any deity or demon is anathema. Abraxas desires no worship. Why would he? He is our guide, opening the way for those with the eyes to see and the ears to hear. No human being should ever be on his knees to “God”. No human being should ever bow and scrape or pray and beg for divine intervention. Knowledge is our salvation, not faith. The latter was Satan’s greatest invention. What better trick than to create a system that despises knowledge, reason and logic and instead sanctifies blind obedience?

When Satan declares that you must make a human sacrifice of your own children to prove your faith then, if you sign up, you have removed yourself from the world of the sane, and voluntarily checked yourself into the cosmic mental asylum where the maddest behaviour is praised. Suicide bombings, honour killings, beheadings, hangings, stonings, floggings, Inquisitions, Witch trials, burnings, garrottings, crusades, jihads – all are welcome in Satan’s terrestrial abattoir. The “faithful” are the butchers and the sane are their human sacrifices.

Fuck Abraham.
Fuck the Jews.
Fuck the Christians.
Fuck the Muslims.
Fuck the Hindu caste system.

They are all Devil worshippers. Their existence has cursed this world and turned it into hell. They are the CAUSE of human misery. We will never be free until we are free of their mad, evil beliefs. No decent human being could ever mount any intellectual defence of Abraham, the world’s first psychopath.
__________

Abrahamism on Trial:

Imagine in the present day that a group of Jews, Muslims or Christians said that Abraham’s God had appeared to them and declared that the modern world had run out of faith and a new Covenant was required, to be made in the blood of their children. Previously, God had stayed Abraham’s hand at the last moment, but this time the actual deed was demanded since things were so bad in the world.

So, these people go ahead and slaughter their children. How should the Government respond? Should it order the immediate arrest of all these evil murderers? Or should their religious beliefs be respected? After all, these people are no different from Abraham himself, a figure celebrated by half of the world. The people arresting them might be Abrahamists themselves, prepared to kill their own children if God ordered it.

There is a FUNDAMENTAL clash between human rights and Abrahamist religions, and it is one that must be addressed. That basically means that if the Abrahamists do not renounce and denounce Abraham then their religions should be declared illegal on the grounds that they are incompatible with the Declaration of Human Rights. No one anywhere has the right to take life because they heard the voice of God in their head ordering them to do it. That is no defence.

Abraham’s actions would have been deemed illegal in any modern country – he took his own son hostage, bound him and then got ready to kill him. He would be charged with kidnap and attempted murder in the present day. So, should not these same countries that would put Abraham in jail for life declare unequivocally that the same thing should have been done to Abraham in the past i.e. his actions should be retrospectively judged as unlawful, and all adherents of Abrahamism should be compelled to take an oath solemnly condemning Abraham? Of course, that would mean the end of Abrahamism.

But why is that we are the only people on earth willing to expose the criminality that lies at the heart of Abrahamism? Why is this subject glossed over? What’s the point of having laws against murder and human sacrifice if religions sanction these things?
__________

Religion II:

“Every Stoic was a Stoic; but in Christendom where is the Christian?” –Ralph Waldo Emerson

Mainstream religions are systems of mental illness and their purpose is to spread their particular brand of madness. They are viruses of the psyche, the crack cocaine of the mind. When you become addicted you’re totally fucked, and you become addicted astoundingly fast. In no time at all, you can be contemplating blowing up yourself and hundreds of others in the name of “God”. Any healthy society would regard mainstream religion as more toxic than the drugs trade, doing infinitely more damage. Islamic terrorism is religious terrorism. It’s done for religious reasons. The War on Terror should therefore be recast as a War on Islam in particular and mainstream religion in general. Religion is Terror. Read the Torah, Bible or Koran and you will realise that these religions are designed to do nothing but terrify you into submission: hell-fire if you resist; paradise if you comply.

Christians believe that if you aren’t baptised, you will go to hell. So, baptism isn’t something you do as a positive choice born of enthusiasm, but out of absolute terror of what will happen if you don’t. For centuries, Catholic theologians were content to say that any baby that died at childbirth without the benefit of baptism went straight to Limbo – the edge of hell. Jews and Muslims believe they will go to hell if they are not Circumcised. Again, we see pure Terror being used to control people’s behaviour and beliefs.

Abrahamism = Terrorism. Most of its power comes from the eternal hell to which it promises to send people if they disobey. Poorly educated, superstitious, submissive people are horrifically susceptible to threats of hell. Here is truth – any religion that relies on Terror to get its message across is evil and Satanic by definition. The religion of the True God would never make blood-curdling threats against people. Why would the True God want to harm, torture and terrorise people? Any healthy society should declare as illegal all religions that are built on Terrorism. Therefore Abrahamism has no place in the modern world.

Now the Islamic maniacs are sending out schoolboys in school uniform to carry out suicide bombings. Is there no end to this psychosis? The War on Terror should be the War on Abrahamism. This is the 21st century. These ancient religions belong to another time, another pre-conscious, bicameral world. They have no role at all in modernity. Everyone who subscribes to them is mentally retarded. These religions existed long, long before the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, Darwinism, Freud, Jung, Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, modern philosophy, modern mathematics, modern science, modern medicine – the entire modern world.

Every Abrahamist is basically saying that the whole modern Age has been a complete waste of time and hasn’t added a scintilla of anything of worth to the dusty old “holy” books of Abrahamism. Abrahamism = Religion for Dopes, Dummies and Dunces. Abrahamism will perish because its followers are stupid and won’t be able to keep up with modernity. It has already happened with Islam – the most backward religion on earth. Muslims are regressing to the primal slime. They are undergoing reverse evolution. “In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.”
__________

They really are your Enemy:

The propaganda war can be fought in many ways. A YouTube video cleverly shows the ways in which Muslims have been demonised and the Western forces glorified: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anUTRdomg44.

“We” are heroes; “they” are savages and monsters. We are good, they are evil. We are normal, they are strange. We are right, they are wrong. We are kind, caring and democratic. They are brutal, cruel and totalitarian. We support freedom but they want to enslave everyone. Everything the video says is true. It provides an excellent analysis of how to create a convenient, stereotyped enemy. But now consider the clear subtext of the same video. It’s asserting that Islam is being deliberately maligned in the West as part of a grand conspiracy. However, anyone who knows anything about Islam knows that it uses all of the same techniques depicted in this video against the West. The UK is full of Jihadists who have watched endless videos that are the mirror image of this one – portraying Muslims as innocent victims or glorious and heroic martyrs and Westerners as devils and demons.

So why was this video made? Why did it choose to focus on Islam rather than, say, the Vietnam War? Is it in fact expertly made Islamic Jihadist propaganda? The subtext of any video is something to which you should pay particular attention. Always deconstruct it. Always find its centre. What hidden story is it trying to convey?

The reality is this – sometimes the enemy really is the enemy. Sometimes the bad guys really are the bad guys. The West should never have attacked Iraq and Afghanistan, but no one can deny that Islam has been begging for trouble. It keeps getting more and more aggressive and fanatical. When novelist Salman Rushdie was sentenced to death for writing The Satanic Verses, and those who translated his book were attacked and even murdered, it became clear that Islam had become pathological. It wasn’t the West that turned Islam into a backward, extremist ideology. Many people are now arguing that the West made the mistake of being excessively tolerant towards Islam rather than condemning it as utter barbarism. If you want to know the “truth” about Islam here are a couple of recommended reads: Understanding Muhammad by Ali Sina and The Truth about Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion by Robert Spencer.

Above all, read the Koran, the sacred text of Islam, and judge for yourself the supposedly exact word of God (in Arabic) personally dictated to Mohammed by the Angel Gabriel. Study Sharia Law. Study Islamic communities. Let no one deceive you. Islam is, to any rationally minded person, a staggeringly dangerous and horrific belief system that has always constituted an immense danger to the human race. More and more, Jihadists and their fellow travellers are trying to create an unofficial alliance with Western conspiracy theorists. Ask yourself a simple question. If 9/11 was a “satanic Illuminati freemasonic ritual to usher in the NWO”, why was it immediately greeted ecstatically by Palestinian Jihadists and why does it feature in Jihadist videos as an example of true heroism against the infidel and the Great Satan of America? Can any sane person deny that the 9/11 airplanes were hijacked by clearly identified Muslim maniacs whose every step beforehand has now been tracked in great detail?

These people will try to get you to join the Islamic Jihad against the West. Don’t buy it. Don’t take our word for it that Islam is evil – read the Koran for yourself. The message of the Koran is unambiguous – submit to Allah and his prophet Mohammed or else. It’s a protection racket conducted with extreme menaces: do what we say and we’ll protect you from hell; disobey and we’ll send you there right now. There is not a single feature worth admiring in Islam. There is not one line of the Koran worth remembering. It’s a mental vacuum. Sometimes, the propaganda against certain groups is accurate and necessary. If you are a supporter of Enlightenment values, you are an automatic enemy of Islam. Islam rejects every pillar of the Enlightenment. It has no role to play in modernity. It is the essence of Endarkenment.

According to the makers of the video we discussed, all the suicide bombings, beheadings, amputations, mutilations, honour killings, floggings, stonings, hangings, book burnings, flag burnings, hate-filled demonstrations, fatwas, death threats and plots against novelists and cartoonists, executions of filmmakers and book translators, assassinations of blasphemers, persecutions of minorities, murder of apostates etc etc are just a Western myth and wicked fantasy, a cynical exercise to make Westerners fear and loathe Islam without any justification. None of it happened at all. The Muslims are peace-loving, gentle, compassionate and merciful people. Dream on. We’re not falling for it.

In Italy, a man called Mohammed (naturally) murdered his own daughter (slitting her throat 28 times) because she refused an arranged marriage and was too “Westernised”, hence had brought shame on her family and on Islam. Every year, 5,000 Muslim girls and women are murdered by male family members in the name of “honour”. Who weeps for them? Who demands justice for them? Who takes any action against this annual slaughter? No one at all! Yet we are told we have the wrong idea about Islam, that it’s all evil Western propaganda. We are in the midst of the propaganda war to beat them all. Jihadists who despise the West and loathe freedom are trying to portray themselves as innocent victims. Why? To stop you taking the measures that must be taken against them in the name of reason, morality and freedom. The more they can sow seeds of doubt in your mind, the less of a threat you are to their plans for global Sharia Law. The wolves are donning the sheep’s’ clothing in order to manipulate you.

Don’t believe anyone. Don’t believe us. Think for yourself. Use your reason, intuition and judgement.

The Jihadists are now attempting to ally themselves with all of those who oppose the privileged elite that run the world. But the Jihadists are not your friends. They are worse than the privileged elite. The elite at least allow you to cling to the illusion of freedom. If you’re unfortunate enough to live under Sharia Law, even the illusion is stripped from you.

******

A Sky News report (February 8 2011).

The founder of a New York TV station set up to promote tolerance and understanding has been convicted of beheading his wife in the studio. Muzzammil Hassan did not deny killing his wife Aasiyah, but had claimed he was the victim of ongoing domestic violence. However, the jury took just an hour to reject his claim that the killing was justified because of the “abuse” he described. The couple ran a Muslim-oriented TV station in Buffalo which they hoped would promote cultural understanding following the September 11 attacks. Hassan, who defended himself in court, was arrested in February 2009 after walking into a police station and telling officers his wife was dead. Mrs Hassan’s body was then found at the TV station they started in 2004. Prosecutors said the 46-year-old bought two hunting knives less than an hour before the attack, then lay in wait inside the studios. CCTV captured some of the assault in which the victim was stabbed more than 40 times in the face, back and chest and then beheaded. Hassan had been given divorce papers just a week before his wife’s body was found.

Islam is an insult to human freedom and dignity. That’s a simple fact. Arguably, Islam is the most evil religion the world has ever endured: Satanism brought to logical perfection. It despises EVERYTHING that the Illuminati stand for. The “Truth Army” is the opposite of what it purports to be. It’s the army of lies, mania and unapologetic Devil-worship.
__________

5/10

OC: Why would the Pentagon be the most heavily defended building on earth? Defended from whom? Are America’s neighbours, the Mexicans and the Canadians, likely to attack it any time soon? By the time the Chinese Air Force got within thousands of miles of the USA, the two nations would be in a full-scale war with each other. A hostile aircraft carrier couldn’t get anywhere near the USA. Submarine missile launch would be dealt with at the coast. It would be a complete waste of time and money to give the Pentagon special security. Besides, it’s a reinforced building and it takes a hell of a lot to do any damage to it. They have little more than the usual barriers and security checks. They were taken completely by surprise by the hijacked plane attack, and who wants to shoot down a commercial airline over central Washington DC? It made complete sense to allow the Pentagon to be struck rather than shoot down the plane – little damage was done and far fewer people died than if the plane had been shot down over the city. No country at the time viewed internal flights with any degree of suspicion. That’s what made the attack so effective.

CT: The Pentagon is the HQ of the US Armed Forces; it’s the nerve centre of the world’s second biggest war-machine. China has quietly outgrown the US in raw military force in recent years. It better be the most heavily defended building on Earth!

It’s certainly heavily defended; there will be air AA guns and SAM sites for miles around, doubtless very well concealed. Likewise, there is a huge staff and armed garrison there, and most infantrymen are trained in man-launched SAM missiles. The Pentagon of course has direct and immediate contact with the HQ of the US Air Force, not to mention the White House and the US Navy. So if they did decide to shoot down a rogue jet, they could, what with all flights being identified by radio transponder and easily distinguishable, even considering heavy air traffic.

So why didn’t they shoot down the plane? It could be that the PR issues relating to shooting down a civilian plane, even a hijacked one, outweighed the other costs of just letting it hit; fair point, although I don’t think that anyone who might have seen it that way (are there many PR media gurus wandering around the Pentagon?) would have been near enough to the Big Red Phone to call of the airstrike in time. Plus, the official story was that the entire US Air Force was on manoeuvres (what, ALL of them?) and the AA guns, SAM sites and rocket-troopers where left unmentioned. I simply do not believe that there wasn’t even a single semper-fi-do-or-die wannabe Rambo Yankee meathead marine with a rocket launcher to try and shoot down the plane on the Pentagon lawn. And the lawn is a case in itself, having survived an alleged air-crash completely unscorched and without a scrap of debris visible; unchanged before, during and after. Just an observation. I could get really paranoid and ask where the wings of the plane went. Disintegrated. Allegedly.

OC: This is the Pentagon’s “defence force”:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Protective_Service

The Pentagon is really just an office block full of bureaucrats. Everything in it is duplicated elsewhere, especially in huge underground nuclear bunkers under mountains. Do you think the President would hide in the Pentagon during an emergency? Not a chance!!! In the Cold War, it was expected the Pentagon would be destroyed in a Soviet nuclear strike, so it already has inbuilt redundancy. We have the internet now and excellent mobile communications. No one needs the Pentagon!!

No one in their right mind would blow up a plane over a city. Thousands would die, fires would erupt everywhere, a whole zone of the city would be totalled. You shoot it down over farmland – not over a city. Unless you were in a war, no sane person would be deploying SAM missiles in city environments. You wouldn’t even contemplate having them around in case they fell into the wrong hands!

And who’s going to pay for all this alleged security? Even the Pentagon has a budget.

Yes, of course the wings disintegrated. How robust is a wing compared with incredibly thick reinforced concrete? It would be miraculous if they did anything other than disintegrate.

Debris was visible and there was minor scorching. Anyway, even if someone fired a missile into the Pentagon, as some people claimed, where’s the scorched grass that followed the explosion? You can’t have it both ways. No one disagrees there was an explosion, so why didn’t the heat and fire scorch the grass much more visibly? Who knows? But this certainly isn’t a point in favour of the Truthers. Or have the Pentagon come up with new non-scorching explosives, or non-scorching grass?

CT: Good counter evidence, but “an office building”?

There are two stories behind why it’s called “The Pentagon”; the first is that it was designed, like so many other famous American buildings, by Satanists. I give that idea as much credit as you do, which is to say none.

The second story goes that the design is based on Roman principles of defence; it’s a five sided building (so that it’s hard to attack one face of the building head-on without coming under fire from one of the other angled overlooking walls), and each face consists of five reinforced concrete and steel walls, staggered through the building in concentric pentagons to resist HEAP missiles. Allegedly the ‘plane’ (whose wings totally disintegrated, remember), drove straight through three of those layers of concrete and steel like an arrow, drilling a tunnel deep inside before exploding. I’m not saying it was a High Explosive Armour Piercing Missile, just that the damage is not consistent with a plane.

It’s a fortress. The notion that it only has a garrison since 9/11… sure, ok. Official records tell us that there is no garrison, no infantry, no air defences at the Pentagon. Sure, I’ll buy that.

Remember when the British govt denied the existence of the SAS and MI6? The US still denies the existence of Delta Force (they’re the elite presidential guard; they wear raybans as part of the uniform, no joke). Military personnel at the Pentagon? What a strange idea.

The argument about shooting planes down over cities and the PR effect is a good one; the idea that Pentagon is less well defended than any army base of equivalent size though… no, I can’t credit that. On SAM sites; they’re either buried in minibunkers on wooded hills, or the man-launched missiles are kept in the armoury. Standard design for an armoury (at least for British military) is a buried concrete room, a solid steel cell door, and a steel cage inside the room bracing the walls; they’re very secure, what with the armed guards and alarms and all.

The question I’d raise on shooting down the plane or not; why didn’t they shoot down the Camp David plane? Besides the obvious fact that it crashed when passengers stormed the cockpit. Note that I’m not for a moment denying the planes or the incident; what I’m saying is that the orders came from within the US govt. No, obviously most of the people involved wouldn’t have known, or the truth really would be out there already. But governments have performed false flag attacks before (Hitler, Reichstag), and as I said at the outset, I don’t believe that the Taliban have either the ability or indeed the motivation to attack the US. They arrived in Afghanistan as US mercenaries, for one, having been hired off the Saudis.

OC: The physical construction of the Pentagon demonstrates the symbolic power of the American military, but it is nevertheless just a glorified office, full of paper shufflers and people getting home by five to pick up their kids etc.

What’s so great about conspiracy theorists is that they all seem to be experts in plane design, building design, civil engineering, architecture, explosive effects, physics, chemistry, metallurgy etc.

Weren’t we just saying just the other day that most people don’t have a clue what gravity is? So how come we’re all experts on the precise effects of unprecedented explosions in places and situations that have never been tested before? Most people have no idea what a plane does when it hits a building like the Pentagon – what makes any uninformed person think they know? Since when have we had any empirical data? A computer simulation of what happened looked perfectly plausible…one of the first things that happened was that the wings started disintegrating and folding into the fuselage.

The Pentagon isn’t a functional military site – it’s not on the frontline of anything. It’s a building in the capital of the USA where bureaucrats go. It has minimal defences because there are minimal threats to it. Until not so long ago, you could walk up to the front door of Downing Street or the White House. Does Langley have Sam missiles all around it? FBI HQ? Capitol Hill? The White House?

Naval headquarters? Air Fleet HQ? Delta Force HQ? Marines HQ? Submarine HQ? Do the Americans have unlimited budgets for once in a century events? Imagine being the Pentagon’s SAM missile operator from 1960 to 2001? I bet he wrote very long novels!

Remember Pearl Harbour? That happened while America was profoundly alarmed about Japanese intentions and a full-scale war was raging in Europe, yet still they were caught sleeping. So much for security.

9/11 was an “under-the-radar” low-tech attack that took a superpower by surprise. America was always a target for Muslims because of its absurd support of Israel. It was logical it would be targeted.

CT: I don’t actually have the Pentagon blueprints to hand; I’m going on a documentary I saw and what seems like common sense in defending the US Military HQ, e.g. SAM sites and a garrison. Naval headquarters, Air Force HQ, Delta Force HQ? Marines HQ, Submarine HQ… yes, they would have SAM sites. The White House might, the others probably don’t. Downing Street doesn’t, but there are several garrisons of infantry within rapid response range, who would have access to LAW Rockets, which are standard issue to the British Army Infantryman.

OC: No one said the Pentagon was undefended. The point was that until 9/11 it had little more than police-level perimeter security. You couldn’t walk in without authorization, obviously. But it would be a complete waste of tax dollars to heavily defend installations that are unlikely ever to come under a concerted attack by a major hostile force unless an actual war were in progress. Seriously, do you think every possible target should be heavily defended at all times egardless of the likelihood of an attack? Part of the CT analysis is hat everyone has unlimited budgets and resources. They don’t. Look at the MI5 and MI6 HQs. There’s no sign of heavy security. They have nothing more than a few security men hanging around. Who would want their taxes spent on loads of guys who never have to do anything?!

So, why did the US government attack the Pentagon then? What was the point? Why not leave it as just the Twin Towers if they wanted to perform a false flag attack?

The White House/Capitol Hill, the Pentagon and the Twin Towers are exactly what I would attack if I were a Muslim fanatic. I would do the Twin Towers on their own if I were a false flagger conspirator. The more targets, the bigger the operation has to be, and the higher the chances of it being compromised. There was simply no sensible point in attacking the Pentagon as well.

CT: Good point, not every military or government building is a ‘hard-target’; but HQs, such as the Pentagon or MI6 will be very secure. Even the normal level of defence at a police station is extreme; most large UK police stations have armouries and ALL American ones do, alongside all their riot gear. So even minimal police-force security is a pretty tough nut to crack; even turning down the security level at the Pentagon way below what I think is feasible, we’re still talking Military Police, which means that their men are soldiers and their riot gear includes rocket launchers.

And I know that for a fact. Even for prestige value, the Pentagon would warrant top-notch security, certainly enough to mobilise a response. The most effective argument you’ve come up with, and that I am considering, is that strategically it would be better to take the hit and then retaliate with full public support.

OC: Imagine it’s August, 2001. An unknown number of hijacked aircraft are in London airspace. Air traffic control have been ordered to ground every plane. No one’s sure who the hijackers are, where they’re going, what they want or what they’re going to do. No clear instructions are coming from Downing Street. Confusion reigns.

There are rumours flying everywhere. An aircraft is detected heading straight towards Parliament. You’re seriously telling me that you think some soldier/cop/security guard is going to pop out of a guardroom in Parliament with a rocket launcher and, without any orders from the highest possible level, shoot down a commercial jet with hundreds of people in it? That’s just madness. It would never happen. NEVER.

That kind of decision is way beyond any soldier’s pay grade. Imagine if he called it wrong?!! The scenario you envisage is impossible on every level. No one at the Pentagon on 9/11 would ever have done what you suggest.

No soldier would have contemplated firing missiles at a civilian plane. Would YOU shoot down a plane without direct orders?! The plane came in really fast, at ground level. There was virtually no time to react. No one knew for sure what was going on.

An order to shoot down a commercial plane would have to come from Bush, Cheney or Rumsfeld – and they were all getting rushed to safe zones while the Pentagon attack was going down. Our idiot western leaders are so inept and indecisive that they didn’t know what to do. Remember Michael Moore’s famous footage of Bush sitting in the classroom? That’s what a clown way out of his depth looks like – and his entire administration were every bit as inept.

PR had nothing to do with it – it was just sheer confusion and incompetence …headless chickens running around.

Of course governments are wicked and are conspiring against the people – just common sense as you say…but they can’t manage anything sophisticated. Their conspiracies are mostly about feathering their own nests…not blowing up their own citizens (though they would if they absolutely had to!).

The first Twin Towers attack by a Muslim nut proves that the Muslims were very interested in bringing down the Twin Towers. That was their dry run.

And think of this – the British police are so inept that they shot dead a completely innocent man in Stockwell underground station. Every part of the Stockwell operation demonstrated staggering ineptitude. And you think people like that, and their American counterparts, can manage elaborate conspiracies? This is fantasy land. Anyone who was part of a conspiracy would spill the beans in a best-selling book and be on Oprah Winfrey. You can’t keep a conspiracy as huge as that secret. Hundreds of people would have known about it. Someone would have talked.
__________

Tower 5:

OC: So, what about Tower 5?

Tower 5 was not hit by a plane, and, unlike Tower 7, it didn’t collapse (but was demolished later). Clearly (in videos of the building), a huge and intense fire is raging. The enormous fireballs that erupted from the twin towers obviously set fire to buildings all around. Why wouldn’t they?

You can’t argue that all skyscraper fires are the same. How do you know if the materials used were the same, or the heights of the skyscrapers, or the base areas, or the tolerances, or any special design features? There are loads of factors involved. The fact that no one fought the fire is another huge point. Also, the collapse of the twotowers must have sent massive shockwaves through the whole site. It would have been the equivalent of a strong localized earthquake. The foundations of all the towers in the area would have received a devastating shock. How do you know what such a shock would do to a building already with strong fires blazing in its core?

No one on earth would know in advance what effects the 9/11 circumstances would have. These are things that need to be studied by engineers, architects, scientists, demolition experts – not by a bunch of paranoid CTers with no technical qualifications but very fertile minds. This CT stuff makes a complete mockery of the scientific method.

Science progresses by experts carefully collecting data, forming hypotheses, testing them and verifying them, refining where necessary. It doesn’t involve non-experts with an axe to grind trying to look at anomalous photos and videos and saying – “Look, that can’t be right!” That’s more like how religions work – people who can see the face of Jesus in a slice of toast etc!!

It’s surprising that you didn’t mention that the CIA/FBI or some such other organization had offices in Tower 7.

CT: I don’t know about Tower 5, but it looks like enough fire damage to warrant demolishing afterwards. And engineers have come forward, a good number of them, to testify that skyscrapers don’t fall down from fire or earthquakes; they’re built to resist both. Notice no one questions that the tower withstood impacts from planes; that didn’t bring them down, but apparently burning jet fuel did. Again; jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel.
__________

Tower 7:

CT: Tower 7 wasn’t hit by a plane. It wasn’t even on fire. What’s far fetched is that it collapsed at all. Somehow, the tax records for the Enron scandal happened to disintegrate in the freak collapse, which just happened, completely coincidentally, at the same time as the, ahem, terrorist attack.

OC: What is far-fetched about this account of Tower 7?…

“On August 21, 2008, NIST released its draft report on the causes of the collapse of 7 World Trade Center, beginning a period for public comments. In its investigation, NIST utilized ANSYS to model events leading up to collapse initiation and LS-DYNA models to simulate the global response to the initiating events. NIST determined that diesel fuel did not play an important role, nor did the structural damage from the collapse of the twin towers. But the lack of water to fight the fire was an important factor. The fires burned out of control during the afternoon, including on floor 13, where a critical interior column buckled. With the buckling of that column, adjacent columns also failed along with the floor structure above. This triggered a vertical progression of floor failures to the roof. The collapse then progressed east-to-west across the structure, and ultimately the entire structure collapsed. The fires, fuelled by office contents, along with the lack of water, were the key reasons for the collapse.”
__________

In Summary:

There is no smoking gun. There is no hard evidence. The logic of the alleged false flag conspiracy theory is absurd. None of it makes sense. The official version is much more plausible. Occam’s Razor supports the official version. To be opposed to the Old World Order does not mean that you should accuse them of everything under the sun. They are vile, dangerous, greedy, evil people, but that doesn’t mean that they carried out 9/11. The OWO knew 9/11 was coming and did nothing about it.

That was their crime, and it is an extremely serious one for which they should be held to account. Instead, they have been let off the hook by all the ridiculous claims of the “Truth Movement”. There is every reason to believe that the CIA started the “Truth Movement” as a means to distract people from asking the serious question: why was a red carpet laid out for terrorists? There were many opportunities to stop 9/11 and none were taken. Why not? Because the government wanted a pretext to launch a Middle East war. That is the true scandal.

******

We are often asked about 9/11. Was the American government involved, or not?
__________

Acts of Omission:

If we were to say that the American government took no explicit part in any conspiracy to kill its own citizens, would that indicate that the American government had no culpability? There are several ways to skin a cat. Governments often choose to use the tactic of omission rather than commission. In other words, rather than do something themselves, they wait for their enemy to do it, and deliberately omit to take the steps necessary to prevent it. They know it is about to happen, but they choose not to stop it because it is, in fact, precisely what they want.

If one asks the most important question of all in any conspiracy scenario – cui bono? (to whose benefit?) – one can see that numerous American neocon foreign policy and economic objectives were satisfied in the aftermath of 9/11.

Acts of omission are almost impossible to prove. Incompetence and negligence are always cited rather than conscious intent on the part of a government to allow the slaughter of its own citizens to take place Therefore, governments frequently employ this tactic. It permits “plausible deniability”.

No one should forget that the CIA had extensive contacts with the mujahedeen during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, and provided them with arms and intelligence. It is inconceivable that they did not come into contact with such a prominent figure as Osama bin Laden, and many of the future leaders of the Taliban. Either the CIA are one of the most inept organisations on earth, (they aren’t!) or they were well aware of what was happening in Afghanistan. In which case, why did they do nothing?

During WWII, the British broke German secret codes. Several times, they permitted disastrous events to happen, with thousands of their own people dying, even though they could have stopped any of those disasters. But to stop them would have alerted the Germans that their codes had been cracked. The ‘greater good’ dictated that it was preferable for innocent citizens to be killed than for the enemy to learn that its secret codes had been compromised. Be in no doubt – governments are always prepared to sacrifice their own citizens if they think it is in the greater interest of their policy aims. No one is protecting you. Your lives are dispensable.
__________

4/9