Dacia Iluministă

Religion, judged by the consequences it has had for humanity, is more like the work of the Devil than of God. It has generated legions of zombies, so brainwashed they will kill people in the name of their supposedly merciful, peaceful, loving, forgiving, compassionate God. It’s time to face the grimmest of facts: religion is evil. Or, rather, the religions that have assumed dominance in the world are evil. They succeeded precisely because they are evil. They are Satan’s work, his instruments for imposing his will on humanity. Isn’t that the most credible interpretation of the religious history of the world? Is Jerusalem the city of God or the capital of hell?

Religion is a system of mind control. It’s time to reclaim it and make it what it was intended to be – humanity’s greatest gift. The main religions make no sense. Frankly, they are absurd. That could perhaps be overlooked if they had succeeded in making the world a better place, a paradise. But they haven’t even though they’ve had thousands of years to do so. They claim to teach love, peace and being generous and helpful towards others, so where is the New Eden? Where is the Golden Age? Where are justice, peace and prosperity for all? And since these religions haven’t delivered, why haven’t they been replaced by something more effective? Why do people cling to failure?

This is a wicked world filled with war, greed and intolerance. Fanatical suicide bombers murder innocents in the name of their God. Surely they mean Satan. Don’t we detect the smell of sulphur emanating from these people?

The main religions serve only one purpose: to control your behaviour and make you their slave. They try to dictate to you every second of the day with their inflexible dogmas, commandments and rules. They have proved immensely valuable to the powerful, rich and corrupt. The mainstream religions and the Old World Order work hand in hand to make our lives miserable. Isn’t it time we wised up? If the main religions aren’t benefiting us, isn’t it time to change them to ones that do?

The pagans of ancient Greece and Rome fought political but never religious wars. They didn’t wage jihads and crusades. They didn’t excommunicate people and burn them at the stake for religious transgressions. They didn’t martyr themselves in the name of Zeus and Jupiter. The only ancient nation that engaged in explicit holy war was (surprise, surprise) Israel. The Hebrews exterminated the Canaanites in the name of their God. They even claimed that their God accompanied them into battle in the Ark of the Covenant. So much for love and peace.

The Greeks, Egyptians and Romans had many gods. When they conquered other countries, they frequently absorbed the gods of the vanquished into their own pantheon. In religious terms, they were for the most part extremely tolerant and open-minded. Their pagan religions offered great freedom, inspiration, ecstatic moments and a variety of routes to exploring and experiencing the divine. There were no fierce, bearded prophets, no holy scriptures claiming to be the true word of God, no Inquisitions to eradicate heretics. These pagan religions understood that humans are diverse, while the Abrahamic religions demand slavish conformity.

The God of Abrahamism is usually pictured as an old and bearded man living in the sky, suitably invisible in normal circumstances, constantly staring into your mind and ready to send you to hell if you violate his rules. Of course, all the followers of other religions go straight to hell, yet although he sends these people to a place of eternal suffering, he still loves YOU. This perfect, universal God apparently has a favourite race: his “Chosen People”. Why? Did he create only a small percentage of the world’s population? If not, why does he reject the rest of the human race? And if this perfect, all-powerful being who created us didn’t want us to commit “sins”, then we wouldn’t be able to, would we? So clearly, he wants us to sin so that he can then punish us for our transgressions. He gets off on it. He’s a sadist, a torturer.

It’s also strange that his holy texts, given to us in his own, infallible words (supposedly), are so badly written, so hard to understand, so heavily coded and, even worse, so full of inconsistencies and illogicalities that they are quite beyond belief. Come on, a perfect God should be able to articulate clearly what he wants from us, shouldn’t he?

If this God is perfect, why is he so jealous, cruel and violent (the Old Testament reads like the adventures of a psychopath – read it for yourself and you’ll be appalled)? Does he really desire slavish worship by dumb, bowing humans eternally reciting holy texts like mindless parrots? Most of us would be bored to tears by constantly hearing the same uninspiring prayers. Why does God find it so exciting?

What about so-called tolerance? Christianity wasn’t spread by love, but by fire and sword. Muslims are ordered to kill Christians and Jews. Jews think God chose them, though he seems to disagree judging by millennia of expulsions, pogroms and persecutions, culminating in the Holocaust!

So, one question can’t be avoided. Isn’t “God” an impostor? Isn’t he the Father of Lies who has pulled off the most daring impersonation in history?

Ladies and gentlemen, let us introduce you to Satan, the great deceiver. Who else could be behind the millennia of carnage carried out in the name of “God”? As soon as you understand that it was Satan all along, everything becomes crystal clear. The Gnostics saw the truth millennia ago. Why has everyone else been so slow on the uptake?

Satan loves conflict, war, intolerance, hunger, pain, suffering and everything else we have had inflicted on us by religious fanatics. That’s the God of the Christians, Jews and Muslims for you! The Eastern religions’ Devil is the toxic doctrine of karma that gave birth to the abominable Hindu caste system and the idea that we are being punished for sins committed in previous existences. Now do you understand why the world is so wicked, so full of suffering and misery? Humanity has been worshipping the wrong guy. The God most people pray to is the Devil.

It’s time we left behind these monstrous, false religions of Satan. Let’s turn to a religion of reason, hope and freedom that celebrates the True God, not Satan. Let’s turn to Illuminism: the religion of light, the religion of enlightenment. What is the purpose of religion? It is to provide answers to the profoundest questions such as: What is the meaning of life? Who created the world? Why does evil exist?

No one needs temples, churches, priests and rabbis for any of that.
__________

Islam – the Dark Ages:

“In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.” Would you stone a couple of young lovers to death? Could there ever be any legitimate religious reason for killing lovers who have done no harm to anyone? No? Muslims think differently. In video footage that shocked the world www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKWrTRw8fSE a large crowd of Afghani Muslims was seen stoning a young woman standing in the middle of her own grave, dressed in a blue burqa so that none of her features could be seen. When she attempted to crawl out of the hole dug for her, she was finished off with gunshots. Her male lover was then brought out and the vicious mob quickly finished him off with their stones. Is Islam a religion or a psychosis? How can anyone who kills lovers say that they believe in a most merciful God? More like the Devil. Islam is a time machine for taking badly educated people 1400 years into the past where they can live like primitive tribes people, cut off from modernity. No one does this to Muslims. They do it to themselves.

The Jewish religion is much older than Islam, but the Jews have mostly stayed in touch with modernity. In fact, they have often been the vanguard of new thinking. There are precious few Jews in comparison with the number of Muslims and yet the Jews have had an almost infinitely greater impact on cultural and intellectual life than the Muslims. Why? Because they have respected education. The Koran, on the other hand, is a book of anti-education.

Here is some drivel by an extremist Islamic Jihadist group called The Truth Army.

Bringing you Truth videos from all over the world to enlighten the masses, fight against ignorance, and destroy the NWO. 9/11 was a satanic Illuminati freemasonic ritual to usher in the NWO, which is comprised of 2 parts:

1. War against Islamic Sharia being implemented as a political system.

2. War against freedom, sovereignty, and prosperity of all of humanity.

The satanic Illuminati dominate several aspects including banking, political, military, media, and economic spheres of influence worldwide.

They are currently destroying the Western world and finalizing the shift of economic power over to the East, specifically China. China is already a model NWO state due to the atheistic nature of the government and totalitarian control of the people.

The long-term goal for the world is massive population reduction through wars, famines, disease, sterilization, abortion, and other means to destroy humanity which the dark Illuminati do in order to please their master, Satan / Shaytan / the Devil. They wish to hasten on the arrival of their awaited one, the Antichrist / False Messiah / The Deceiver, because in their corrupted belief system they believe that they will become supreme and immortal beings by doing this great evil in the world.

They are deceived, and are the worst of mankind. They will have their punishment in the Next Life, and will have no refuge from The Creator of the worlds. The only way to achieve victory against the lies, death, and corruption of the satanic Illuminati is through Truth, Life, and Justice.

The masses of humanity must be educated as to who the true enemy is. We must know ourselves as well as the enemy so that we may effectively fight and destroy the NWO Antichrist system. The time has come to unite all of humanity against the forces of darkness to destroy them if we wish to ensure our own survival.

Educate each other
Unite on all levels
Stand up for the world and future generations

There are more than enough resources in the world for everyone and much more. The death mentality of the Illuminati promotes scarcity, ignorance, and wars, while the righteous people of the world promote wealth, knowledge, wisdom, peace, science, and prosperity.

The Victory of the Righteous Believers is Written.

The God-fearing people of the world shall achieve Success in this life and The Next.

All Power is with God, The Creator of all the worlds.
All Praise is due to Allah.
Peace to the Truthful Ones.
Peace to The Truth Army.

******

Note how this almost exactly matches the rhetoric and analysis of the anarcho-capitalist “Truthers”, and how it inverts the truth in virtually every conceivable way. The Truth Army want to impose Sharia Law on everyone and “unite” the planet under the totalitarian, brainwashed ideology of Islamic Fundamentalism. An Islamic world would be even worse than the present world controlled by the OWO. In fact, it’s hard to conceive of an Islamic-ruled world as being in any way distinguishable from hell.

Muslims don’t want a New World Order for the simple reason that they seek to drag humanity back to the ignorance and savagery of the deserts of Arabia of 1400 years ago. The explicit agenda of Jihadists is to implement, at the point of the sword, gun, improvised explosive device and bomb-belt, global Sharia Law, kill all infidels, apostates, atheists, agnostics, skeptics, freethinkers, blasphemers, homosexuals, heretics, and stone to death any young lovers who have flouted the wishes of their extremist families.

It’s actually pointless to attempt to engage in any rational debate with these people. They are brainwashed beyond any hope of redemption. They will never progress. The problem is how to live in peaceful co-existence with them when they are committed to violently imposing Islam on the rest of the world, just as their Prophet was a savage man steeped in blood who waged savage war against all non- Mohammedans.

This is one of the greatest dilemmas imaginable. Every country in Europe has seen the rise of right-wing parties and the reason is always the same – they want to prevent illiberal Muslims from backward countries coming to Europe and infecting Europe with their ignorance and fanaticism. This is not a racial issue, but purely religious and cultural. Hindus have had no difficulties in integrating in European countries. Hindus who come to Europe are typically smart, liberal, open-minded, tolerant, and happy to befriend and mix with the Europeans. Muslims, on the other hand, refuse to integrate. The only reason they come to Europe is to partake of the higher standard of living. They actively hate Europeans and openly say that all Europeans will go to hell unless they convert to Islam.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s formula for dealing with those who insist on placing their particular will over the General Will was that they must be “forced to be free”. Anyone who aspires to govern a country must be able to take hard decisions. As a tolerant, rational person, how would you deal with the intolerant and the irrational, those who wave an extremist book in your face which, they say, they are commanded to obey on pain of death?

Muslims, Orthodox Jews, Christian Fundamentalists, anarcho-capitalists and the dynastic elites such as the Rothschilds would never accept any of the Rebooting Laws. They would fight to the death to prevent them being implemented. They are stuck in the past.

No healthy State would permit babies to be attacked and genitally mutilated. If an adult wants to be circumcised, that’s his business, but a baby gives no consent, hence must be defended by the law of the land from being circumcised merely to gratify the beliefs of others. A baby has absolute human rights, and foremost amongst those is the right not to be made a human sacrifice in order to satisfy “God” (i.e. Abraham had no right to take his son’s life no matter who ordered him to do so), nor to be genitally mutilated or physically attacked in any way for the sake of “God”.

In the Bible, it is clear that “God” decrees that no human being has any rights whatever. He allegedly exterminated 99.999% of the human race in the Great Flood. When the Nazis killed six million Jews, they were indicted for waging aggressive war, for war crimes and crimes against humanity. When God almost wiped out humanity, not a single indictment was brought against him. Why not? If “God” contravenes the Declaration of Human Rights, shouldn’t he be put on trial just as the Nazis were? This is a fundamental issue because it relates directly to how religious parents treat their children.

All religious parents think that God has an absolute right to kill anyone, no questions asked. Why? Because he is the “Creator”. These same parents think they have the absolute right to kill and mutilate their children, just as if they were God, because, in relation to their children, they are the Creators. So, in Pakistan and many other Islamic countries, “honour” killings are rife. Anyone (usually teenage girls) who shames their family by having an affair, a romance, not agreeing to a forced marriage, marrying someone inappropriate etc, forfeits their life and is murdered, usually by their father, brother or uncle.

Jewish and Muslim parents automatically subject their baby sons to genital mutilation. Religious parents think they have the unquestionable right to brainwash their children into believing the same things that they do. Well, do they have such a right? Is it consistent with human rights? Isn’t it time all religions were placed on trial and explicitly challenged under human rights legislation? Isn’t it time monarchs were put on trial to determine whether they have any right to refer to human beings as their “subjects”?

We live in an absurd world where contradictory laws are allowed to co-exist. Either we have a constitution and a rule of law or we don’t. If we do then no one can be exempt, and that includes religions and monarchs. “God” himself is not above the law. If there is a commandment saying, “Thou shalt not kill”, why isn’t “God” subject to it, especially since he claims to be loving, forgiving, merciful, peace loving, and compassionate? If “God” has the right to kill human beings no questions asked then we are his worthless, disposable slaves and he is a tyrant. If we are not slaves then he has no right to dispense with our lives as he sees fit.
__________

The Black Holocaust:

What is the greatest crime in human history? It concerns precisely this issue of slavery versus absolute human rights.

A book called The Black Holocaust for Beginners by S. E. Anderson estimates that 100 million Africans died as a direct result of the slave trade and slavery. Who were the slave traders? They were Christians and Muslims (and Jews supported slavery too).

Here are some of the comments posted on Amazon about this book.

The information was priceless. It hurt my soul and brought me to tears to know that people who claim to follow God walk so casually in the footsteps of Satan. The cruelty inflicted on innocent men, women and children was incredible. It speaks volumes about the spiritual depravity of the European and Arabian people that they could allow and participate in such atrocities. Our children and children all over the earth must read this book so that they will know, so that they will never forget, and so the human family will never allow this to occur ever again.

Anderson and Holley rightly tackle a topic that deserves study. However, they de-emphasize the well-developed Islamic slave trade that kidnapped more than 11 million Black Africans from their homes between 700 to 1900. This slave trade began centuries before the Atlantic trade and continued for centuries after.

Islamic scripture fully embraces the institution of human slavery. Mohammed left many instructions to slave owners. This express endorsement of human slavery by Mohammed accounts for the fact that human slavery was not abolished in Saudi Arabia until 1964 and not until 1968 in Kuwait. Islamic slavery was no less brutal than the Atlantic variety. Male slaves were routinely castrated and forced into military service. Female slaves become sexual servants whose children were not their own.

The systematic exploitation, enslavement and extermination of Africans in the Western Hemisphere dates from the start of the European slave trade around 1500 BCE to the conclusion of the American Civil War in 1865. The Black Holocaust killed millions of African human beings and is (because of the social prejudice and dehumanisation necessary to justify slavery) the most under-reported event in western history. The Black Holocaust for Beginners is an ideal introduction to this incredible human chronicle of suffering and is a “must” for every school and community library black studies and American history collection.

I’ve been reading everything “black” I could get my hands on since I started my awakening. I stumbled upon the Holocaust book in a small bookstore in Albuquerque, NM and had it read by that afternoon; I couldn’t put it down. I was so impacted upon by the pictures, particularly of Sister Translator hanging from her tongue because she could speak to many and because she dared to strike a white man. It was so very interesting to learn about the Arab slave trade, especially the current state of affairs regarding slavery in Mauritania and the Sudan. Of great interest to me was the numbers Mr. Anderson cites. My husband, who is also a Black activist, has said for year he felt there were 100-150 million involved; it’s easy to see there were really more than that. I applaud Mr. Anderson’s bravery in writing a book about things no one wants to hear. I was moved to tears. Thank you, Mr. Anderson and may the Lord of your Fathers richly bless your life for your contribution to the cause.

We hear endlessly about the Jewish Holocaust, and almost never about the Black Holocaust. Why not? Cui bono? The horrific treatment to which Africans were subjected was a direct consequence of Judaeo-Christian and Islamic beliefs. Africans were heathen infidels, hence destined for hell, hence fully deserving of whatever they got. If God had wanted them to be spared he would have made them People of the Book. Because he didn’t, he clearly wanted them to be slaves, and he placed zero value on their lives. Thus goes the logic of those who believe in a Satanic “God” who thinks nothing of exterminating the Canaanites, drowning the world and subjecting everyone to Original Sin, which means that they then merit eternal hellfire.

The Jewish Holocaust may be viewed in a similar light. Since Christianity asserts that all Jews are going to hell for rejecting Christ, why would there be anything wrong with stuffing them in death camps? They were the damned, just as the Africans were before them. At the Nuremberg Trials, Goering’s defence should have been that Christianity condemns all Jews to hell. All of the Christian prosecutors should have been asked on oath to say whether or not that they agreed that all Jews were hell-bound. If they did (as they would have to if they claimed to be Christian) then on what grounds were they condemning the Nazis for creating hell on earth for the Jews?

The Nazis were merely hastening God’s inevitable judgement. In a world of human rights, there would be no holocausts. Abrahamic religion creates holocausts. What do you expect from a religion that reveres a patriarch prepared to kill his own son in a holocaust? Abrahamism is a religion of murder, mutilation, brainwashing and slavery. It is completely unacceptable in any civilised world.

African Americans provide a crucial test of justice. Because of their history, they have never had easy access to capital in a society based on capital. They have been the victims of racial discrimination for centuries. They have typically been stuck in ghettos and given a poor education. Sport and entertainment have allowed a few to escape but for most there’s no way out. They have never been part of the elite. They have never benefited from privilege. They are not part of the magic circle. All of this gives them moral authority and makes them one of the logical groups to lead the New World Order.
__________

The Sacrifice:

The defining motif of the Abrahamic religions is that the Abrahamic “God” ordered Abraham to perform human sacrifice on his own son, and Abraham agreed. Abrahamist apologists try to explain this away by saying that God intended no harm to the boy. So, let’s test that hypothesis. Imagine the scene. Abraham heroically says to God, “I will never kill my son for you or anyone else. It’s an utterly monstrous and immoral suggestion. One would think you were the Devil rather than God to be able to give such a vile and evil order.”

Are we expected to believe that God would say, “No problem, Abe. I had no intention of letting your son die anyway, and I agree with you about the Devil thing. It was just a test. No biggie.” To which Abraham replies, “Thank God for that, if you’ll pardon the expression. I mean if I had agreed to kill my own son, I’d be a nut, wouldn’t I? And you’d be a nut for asking me to do it. We’d both be psychopaths, wouldn’t we? We’d be evil monsters. You’d be the Devil and I’d be the servant of evil. Obviously, you wanted to make sure that I would never be so deranged as to do something beyond depravity just because you ordered it, right?”

(The biggest tragedy in human history is that Abraham didn’t say this! Think of all the trouble we would have been spared.) God says, “Em, er….I guess so.” Abraham says, “So, what you’re really saying is that I needn’t slavishly obey you and I should exercise my own judgment at all times. I should be free to make up my own mind rather than doing what you say all the time. Right?” God says, “Uh, um, yes, well, I suppose so.” Abraham says, “What a great God you are. I don’t need to do everything you tell me. You’re never going to punish me. I love you. You’re the best. You have truly given me a Paradise to live in.” You think that’s how it would have gone down? Or how about what really would have happened?

God, with fire and brimstone pouring from every orifice, screams, “You dare to defy the Lord thy God?!!!! You have one instant to do what I ordered. If you don’t, I will kill you and your son this second and punish your souls in hell for eternity.” In other words, the story of Abraham is the story of divine Terrorism, with Jehovah the cosmic Terrorist. If Abraham had not been willing to obey orders, he would certainly have been killed, and his son too. His choice was simple – agree to kill his son or suffer eternal hellfire. What choice is that? What “God” forces someone to make such a choice? – only a Satanic God.

It is impossible to excuse Jehovah’s behaviour and his horrific order. To realise that you simply have to ask yourself what Jehovah would have done if Abraham had said no. Abrahamists have fled from that question because they know the answer. The story of Abraham is a very simple one. Abraham’s “God” says, “Obey me or die.” Abraham is allowed to live only if he is prepared to perform the ultimate crime of slaughtering his own child. Any other response would have resulted in his death and his being sentenced to eternal hell. So, what would you do?

What was it the Nazis said in their defence? “We were only obeying orders. If we didn’t we would be killed.” Isn’t that Abraham’s excuse too? We condemn the Nazis as monsters, yet half the world reveres Abraham and thinks he is a mouthpiece of God. How fucked is that? Abrahamism is nothing but the rule of Terror. In Abrahamism, a Terrorist deity demands absolute obedience. What reason do we have or not naming that deity Satan? How could he be any other? There is no conceivable Abrahamic defence. They are Devil worshippers, pure and simple. No good God would ever order anyone to make a human sacrifice of his son.

This “God” should be resisted, not worshipped. He is a monster, a deranged psychopath, the essence of Universal Terror. He does not ask you to worship him, he orders it. If you don’t do so, he kills you. If you do what he says, he promises you heaven, if you don’t, he vows to send you to hell. Where is the morality, the love, the compassion, the mercy, the forgiveness? They don’t exist. Abrahamism is basic Pavlovian conditioning based on punishment and reward.

Jehovah’s equation is the starkest and most brutal imaginable – obey or perish. And how does that differ from what Satan would say? In what way is it possible to distinguish Jehovah from Satan? In the Islamic version of the tale, it is Ishmael not Isaac who is to be sacrificed. Incredibly, the Muslims relate that Shaytan three times pleaded with Abraham to spare Ishmael’s life and three times Abraham violently drove him away by throwing stones at him. This event is “celebrated” every year at the Islamic Hajj.

Obviously, Shaytan didn’t go up to Abraham and say, “Hi, Abe, pleased to meet you – I’m Shaytan, the Prince of Darkness, the cosmic force of absolute evil.” So, Abraham didn’t KNOW it was Shaytan. He simply made that interpretation because a stranger was asking him to do the precise opposite of what Allah was commanding him to – to spare his son’s life rather than kill him! In fact, as the Father of Lies, wouldn’t Shaytan be far more likely to call himself something else? – Allah, for example! (The Satanic Verses controversy was all about Shaytan passing himself off as the Angel Gabriel in order to deceive Mohammed, so why couldn’t he go one better and pass himself off as God? – the ultimate deception.)

So, what we have is someone calling himself Allah demanding human sacrifice, and a stranger pleading with Abraham not to do it. Surely only a sick mind would side with “Allah” against the stranger. Abraham was unquestionably psychotic, with a lust for blood. He was more than happy to carry out the order, which why was he was picked in the first place.

If someone came up to you in the street, said he was God and ordered you to kill someone, and another person, a stranger, screamed at you not to do it, would you naturally believe the first guy, regard the stranger as Satan, and get your dagger out? That was Abraham’s view of the situation, and half of the modern world agree with him. And then these psychos wonder why the world is evil? It’s because of THEM. Allah orders Ishmael’s death and Shaytan begs for Ishmael’s life. Which one is good and which evil? Only a monster would be unable to give the right answer. Which are you? – a monster or a decent, moral human being?

Who would ever consider perpetrating human sacrifice just because someone calling himself “God” commanded it (where was the proof provided that Abraham’s God was what he claimed to be? – it’s simply stated as a fact, yet all the evidence of his behaviour points in the opposite direction). In the modern world, anyone who heard a voice in his head telling him to kill people would be instantly sectioned under the Mental Health Act. Isn’t it extraordinary that half the world think such a person is the prophet of God? The horrific suspicion must remain that Earth is the cosmic mental asylum, the dumping ground for the universe’s nutters. That would explain everything at a stroke, don’t you think?

Abrahamism – not a religion but a mental illness. The Abrahamists are the damned. They are the followers of the true Satan and the story of Abraham is the surest proof of that. No sane person could possibly wish to emulate Abraham and raise a dagger to slaughter his own flesh and blood. How could anyone ever have imagined that the “God” of Abraham was anyone other than Satan? Who but Satan would command his prophet to perform human sacrifice? Would the True God ever do something so sick, grotesque and perverse? The Abrahamists proclaim that it is your sacred duty to slavishly obey “God” no matter that he is ordering you to murder your own child. To mindlessly follow orders is an unimpeachable and unarguable “good”, they say. Is it? Or is Abrahamism the religion of those who abdicate all moral responsibility for their own actions and claim that it’s all the “will of God”? If it is, you might as well be a robot. You have no free will and you are not human.

Billions of humans have worshipped the Devil for millennia and that’s why the world is so fucked, as the Gnostics saw with startling clarity. Surely it’s time for humanity to turn to Abraxas, the True God of Light, Reason and Freedom. The religion of Abraxas has no holy texts, no fanatical prophets, no churches, temples, synagogues or mosques. There are no rules, commandments and regulations. There are no prayer books or hymns. There are no dress codes, no Sabbath days, no threats of eternal hellfire. There is no mutilation of babies, no brainwashing, no inbuilt intolerance.

Instead, there is true spirituality. There is the philosophical, scientific, mathematical, psychological, artistic and religious endeavour to maximise human potential, as driven by the cosmic dialectic. Human beings are pre-Gods. To worship Satan or any deity or demon is anathema. Abraxas desires no worship. Why would he? He is our guide, opening the way for those with the eyes to see and the ears to hear. No human being should ever be on his knees to “God”. No human being should ever bow and scrape or pray and beg for divine intervention. Knowledge is our salvation, not faith. The latter was Satan’s greatest invention. What better trick than to create a system that despises knowledge, reason and logic and instead sanctifies blind obedience?

When Satan declares that you must make a human sacrifice of your own children to prove your faith then, if you sign up, you have removed yourself from the world of the sane, and voluntarily checked yourself into the cosmic mental asylum where the maddest behaviour is praised. Suicide bombings, honour killings, beheadings, hangings, stonings, floggings, Inquisitions, Witch trials, burnings, garrottings, crusades, jihads – all are welcome in Satan’s terrestrial abattoir. The “faithful” are the butchers and the sane are their human sacrifices.

Fuck Abraham.
Fuck the Jews.
Fuck the Christians.
Fuck the Muslims.
Fuck the Hindu caste system.

They are all Devil worshippers. Their existence has cursed this world and turned it into hell. They are the CAUSE of human misery. We will never be free until we are free of their mad, evil beliefs. No decent human being could ever mount any intellectual defence of Abraham, the world’s first psychopath.
__________

Abrahamism on Trial:

Imagine in the present day that a group of Jews, Muslims or Christians said that Abraham’s God had appeared to them and declared that the modern world had run out of faith and a new Covenant was required, to be made in the blood of their children. Previously, God had stayed Abraham’s hand at the last moment, but this time the actual deed was demanded since things were so bad in the world.

So, these people go ahead and slaughter their children. How should the Government respond? Should it order the immediate arrest of all these evil murderers? Or should their religious beliefs be respected? After all, these people are no different from Abraham himself, a figure celebrated by half of the world. The people arresting them might be Abrahamists themselves, prepared to kill their own children if God ordered it.

There is a FUNDAMENTAL clash between human rights and Abrahamist religions, and it is one that must be addressed. That basically means that if the Abrahamists do not renounce and denounce Abraham then their religions should be declared illegal on the grounds that they are incompatible with the Declaration of Human Rights. No one anywhere has the right to take life because they heard the voice of God in their head ordering them to do it. That is no defence.

Abraham’s actions would have been deemed illegal in any modern country – he took his own son hostage, bound him and then got ready to kill him. He would be charged with kidnap and attempted murder in the present day. So, should not these same countries that would put Abraham in jail for life declare unequivocally that the same thing should have been done to Abraham in the past i.e. his actions should be retrospectively judged as unlawful, and all adherents of Abrahamism should be compelled to take an oath solemnly condemning Abraham? Of course, that would mean the end of Abrahamism.

But why is that we are the only people on earth willing to expose the criminality that lies at the heart of Abrahamism? Why is this subject glossed over? What’s the point of having laws against murder and human sacrifice if religions sanction these things?
__________

Religion II:

“Every Stoic was a Stoic; but in Christendom where is the Christian?” –Ralph Waldo Emerson

Mainstream religions are systems of mental illness and their purpose is to spread their particular brand of madness. They are viruses of the psyche, the crack cocaine of the mind. When you become addicted you’re totally fucked, and you become addicted astoundingly fast. In no time at all, you can be contemplating blowing up yourself and hundreds of others in the name of “God”. Any healthy society would regard mainstream religion as more toxic than the drugs trade, doing infinitely more damage. Islamic terrorism is religious terrorism. It’s done for religious reasons. The War on Terror should therefore be recast as a War on Islam in particular and mainstream religion in general. Religion is Terror. Read the Torah, Bible or Koran and you will realise that these religions are designed to do nothing but terrify you into submission: hell-fire if you resist; paradise if you comply.

Christians believe that if you aren’t baptised, you will go to hell. So, baptism isn’t something you do as a positive choice born of enthusiasm, but out of absolute terror of what will happen if you don’t. For centuries, Catholic theologians were content to say that any baby that died at childbirth without the benefit of baptism went straight to Limbo – the edge of hell. Jews and Muslims believe they will go to hell if they are not Circumcised. Again, we see pure Terror being used to control people’s behaviour and beliefs.

Abrahamism = Terrorism. Most of its power comes from the eternal hell to which it promises to send people if they disobey. Poorly educated, superstitious, submissive people are horrifically susceptible to threats of hell. Here is truth – any religion that relies on Terror to get its message across is evil and Satanic by definition. The religion of the True God would never make blood-curdling threats against people. Why would the True God want to harm, torture and terrorise people? Any healthy society should declare as illegal all religions that are built on Terrorism. Therefore Abrahamism has no place in the modern world.

Now the Islamic maniacs are sending out schoolboys in school uniform to carry out suicide bombings. Is there no end to this psychosis? The War on Terror should be the War on Abrahamism. This is the 21st century. These ancient religions belong to another time, another pre-conscious, bicameral world. They have no role at all in modernity. Everyone who subscribes to them is mentally retarded. These religions existed long, long before the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, Darwinism, Freud, Jung, Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, modern philosophy, modern mathematics, modern science, modern medicine – the entire modern world.

Every Abrahamist is basically saying that the whole modern Age has been a complete waste of time and hasn’t added a scintilla of anything of worth to the dusty old “holy” books of Abrahamism. Abrahamism = Religion for Dopes, Dummies and Dunces. Abrahamism will perish because its followers are stupid and won’t be able to keep up with modernity. It has already happened with Islam – the most backward religion on earth. Muslims are regressing to the primal slime. They are undergoing reverse evolution. “In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.”
__________

They really are your Enemy:

The propaganda war can be fought in many ways. A YouTube video cleverly shows the ways in which Muslims have been demonised and the Western forces glorified: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anUTRdomg44.

“We” are heroes; “they” are savages and monsters. We are good, they are evil. We are normal, they are strange. We are right, they are wrong. We are kind, caring and democratic. They are brutal, cruel and totalitarian. We support freedom but they want to enslave everyone. Everything the video says is true. It provides an excellent analysis of how to create a convenient, stereotyped enemy. But now consider the clear subtext of the same video. It’s asserting that Islam is being deliberately maligned in the West as part of a grand conspiracy. However, anyone who knows anything about Islam knows that it uses all of the same techniques depicted in this video against the West. The UK is full of Jihadists who have watched endless videos that are the mirror image of this one – portraying Muslims as innocent victims or glorious and heroic martyrs and Westerners as devils and demons.

So why was this video made? Why did it choose to focus on Islam rather than, say, the Vietnam War? Is it in fact expertly made Islamic Jihadist propaganda? The subtext of any video is something to which you should pay particular attention. Always deconstruct it. Always find its centre. What hidden story is it trying to convey?

The reality is this – sometimes the enemy really is the enemy. Sometimes the bad guys really are the bad guys. The West should never have attacked Iraq and Afghanistan, but no one can deny that Islam has been begging for trouble. It keeps getting more and more aggressive and fanatical. When novelist Salman Rushdie was sentenced to death for writing The Satanic Verses, and those who translated his book were attacked and even murdered, it became clear that Islam had become pathological. It wasn’t the West that turned Islam into a backward, extremist ideology. Many people are now arguing that the West made the mistake of being excessively tolerant towards Islam rather than condemning it as utter barbarism. If you want to know the “truth” about Islam here are a couple of recommended reads: Understanding Muhammad by Ali Sina and The Truth about Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion by Robert Spencer.

Above all, read the Koran, the sacred text of Islam, and judge for yourself the supposedly exact word of God (in Arabic) personally dictated to Mohammed by the Angel Gabriel. Study Sharia Law. Study Islamic communities. Let no one deceive you. Islam is, to any rationally minded person, a staggeringly dangerous and horrific belief system that has always constituted an immense danger to the human race. More and more, Jihadists and their fellow travellers are trying to create an unofficial alliance with Western conspiracy theorists. Ask yourself a simple question. If 9/11 was a “satanic Illuminati freemasonic ritual to usher in the NWO”, why was it immediately greeted ecstatically by Palestinian Jihadists and why does it feature in Jihadist videos as an example of true heroism against the infidel and the Great Satan of America? Can any sane person deny that the 9/11 airplanes were hijacked by clearly identified Muslim maniacs whose every step beforehand has now been tracked in great detail?

These people will try to get you to join the Islamic Jihad against the West. Don’t buy it. Don’t take our word for it that Islam is evil – read the Koran for yourself. The message of the Koran is unambiguous – submit to Allah and his prophet Mohammed or else. It’s a protection racket conducted with extreme menaces: do what we say and we’ll protect you from hell; disobey and we’ll send you there right now. There is not a single feature worth admiring in Islam. There is not one line of the Koran worth remembering. It’s a mental vacuum. Sometimes, the propaganda against certain groups is accurate and necessary. If you are a supporter of Enlightenment values, you are an automatic enemy of Islam. Islam rejects every pillar of the Enlightenment. It has no role to play in modernity. It is the essence of Endarkenment.

According to the makers of the video we discussed, all the suicide bombings, beheadings, amputations, mutilations, honour killings, floggings, stonings, hangings, book burnings, flag burnings, hate-filled demonstrations, fatwas, death threats and plots against novelists and cartoonists, executions of filmmakers and book translators, assassinations of blasphemers, persecutions of minorities, murder of apostates etc etc are just a Western myth and wicked fantasy, a cynical exercise to make Westerners fear and loathe Islam without any justification. None of it happened at all. The Muslims are peace-loving, gentle, compassionate and merciful people. Dream on. We’re not falling for it.

In Italy, a man called Mohammed (naturally) murdered his own daughter (slitting her throat 28 times) because she refused an arranged marriage and was too “Westernised”, hence had brought shame on her family and on Islam. Every year, 5,000 Muslim girls and women are murdered by male family members in the name of “honour”. Who weeps for them? Who demands justice for them? Who takes any action against this annual slaughter? No one at all! Yet we are told we have the wrong idea about Islam, that it’s all evil Western propaganda. We are in the midst of the propaganda war to beat them all. Jihadists who despise the West and loathe freedom are trying to portray themselves as innocent victims. Why? To stop you taking the measures that must be taken against them in the name of reason, morality and freedom. The more they can sow seeds of doubt in your mind, the less of a threat you are to their plans for global Sharia Law. The wolves are donning the sheep’s’ clothing in order to manipulate you.

Don’t believe anyone. Don’t believe us. Think for yourself. Use your reason, intuition and judgement.

The Jihadists are now attempting to ally themselves with all of those who oppose the privileged elite that run the world. But the Jihadists are not your friends. They are worse than the privileged elite. The elite at least allow you to cling to the illusion of freedom. If you’re unfortunate enough to live under Sharia Law, even the illusion is stripped from you.

******

A Sky News report (February 8 2011).

The founder of a New York TV station set up to promote tolerance and understanding has been convicted of beheading his wife in the studio. Muzzammil Hassan did not deny killing his wife Aasiyah, but had claimed he was the victim of ongoing domestic violence. However, the jury took just an hour to reject his claim that the killing was justified because of the “abuse” he described. The couple ran a Muslim-oriented TV station in Buffalo which they hoped would promote cultural understanding following the September 11 attacks. Hassan, who defended himself in court, was arrested in February 2009 after walking into a police station and telling officers his wife was dead. Mrs Hassan’s body was then found at the TV station they started in 2004. Prosecutors said the 46-year-old bought two hunting knives less than an hour before the attack, then lay in wait inside the studios. CCTV captured some of the assault in which the victim was stabbed more than 40 times in the face, back and chest and then beheaded. Hassan had been given divorce papers just a week before his wife’s body was found.

Islam is an insult to human freedom and dignity. That’s a simple fact. Arguably, Islam is the most evil religion the world has ever endured: Satanism brought to logical perfection. It despises EVERYTHING that the Illuminati stand for. The “Truth Army” is the opposite of what it purports to be. It’s the army of lies, mania and unapologetic Devil-worship.
__________

5/10

OC: Why would the Pentagon be the most heavily defended building on earth? Defended from whom? Are America’s neighbours, the Mexicans and the Canadians, likely to attack it any time soon? By the time the Chinese Air Force got within thousands of miles of the USA, the two nations would be in a full-scale war with each other. A hostile aircraft carrier couldn’t get anywhere near the USA. Submarine missile launch would be dealt with at the coast. It would be a complete waste of time and money to give the Pentagon special security. Besides, it’s a reinforced building and it takes a hell of a lot to do any damage to it. They have little more than the usual barriers and security checks. They were taken completely by surprise by the hijacked plane attack, and who wants to shoot down a commercial airline over central Washington DC? It made complete sense to allow the Pentagon to be struck rather than shoot down the plane – little damage was done and far fewer people died than if the plane had been shot down over the city. No country at the time viewed internal flights with any degree of suspicion. That’s what made the attack so effective.

CT: The Pentagon is the HQ of the US Armed Forces; it’s the nerve centre of the world’s second biggest war-machine. China has quietly outgrown the US in raw military force in recent years. It better be the most heavily defended building on Earth!

It’s certainly heavily defended; there will be air AA guns and SAM sites for miles around, doubtless very well concealed. Likewise, there is a huge staff and armed garrison there, and most infantrymen are trained in man-launched SAM missiles. The Pentagon of course has direct and immediate contact with the HQ of the US Air Force, not to mention the White House and the US Navy. So if they did decide to shoot down a rogue jet, they could, what with all flights being identified by radio transponder and easily distinguishable, even considering heavy air traffic.

So why didn’t they shoot down the plane? It could be that the PR issues relating to shooting down a civilian plane, even a hijacked one, outweighed the other costs of just letting it hit; fair point, although I don’t think that anyone who might have seen it that way (are there many PR media gurus wandering around the Pentagon?) would have been near enough to the Big Red Phone to call of the airstrike in time. Plus, the official story was that the entire US Air Force was on manoeuvres (what, ALL of them?) and the AA guns, SAM sites and rocket-troopers where left unmentioned. I simply do not believe that there wasn’t even a single semper-fi-do-or-die wannabe Rambo Yankee meathead marine with a rocket launcher to try and shoot down the plane on the Pentagon lawn. And the lawn is a case in itself, having survived an alleged air-crash completely unscorched and without a scrap of debris visible; unchanged before, during and after. Just an observation. I could get really paranoid and ask where the wings of the plane went. Disintegrated. Allegedly.

OC: This is the Pentagon’s “defence force”:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Protective_Service

The Pentagon is really just an office block full of bureaucrats. Everything in it is duplicated elsewhere, especially in huge underground nuclear bunkers under mountains. Do you think the President would hide in the Pentagon during an emergency? Not a chance!!! In the Cold War, it was expected the Pentagon would be destroyed in a Soviet nuclear strike, so it already has inbuilt redundancy. We have the internet now and excellent mobile communications. No one needs the Pentagon!!

No one in their right mind would blow up a plane over a city. Thousands would die, fires would erupt everywhere, a whole zone of the city would be totalled. You shoot it down over farmland – not over a city. Unless you were in a war, no sane person would be deploying SAM missiles in city environments. You wouldn’t even contemplate having them around in case they fell into the wrong hands!

And who’s going to pay for all this alleged security? Even the Pentagon has a budget.

Yes, of course the wings disintegrated. How robust is a wing compared with incredibly thick reinforced concrete? It would be miraculous if they did anything other than disintegrate.

Debris was visible and there was minor scorching. Anyway, even if someone fired a missile into the Pentagon, as some people claimed, where’s the scorched grass that followed the explosion? You can’t have it both ways. No one disagrees there was an explosion, so why didn’t the heat and fire scorch the grass much more visibly? Who knows? But this certainly isn’t a point in favour of the Truthers. Or have the Pentagon come up with new non-scorching explosives, or non-scorching grass?

CT: Good counter evidence, but “an office building”?

There are two stories behind why it’s called “The Pentagon”; the first is that it was designed, like so many other famous American buildings, by Satanists. I give that idea as much credit as you do, which is to say none.

The second story goes that the design is based on Roman principles of defence; it’s a five sided building (so that it’s hard to attack one face of the building head-on without coming under fire from one of the other angled overlooking walls), and each face consists of five reinforced concrete and steel walls, staggered through the building in concentric pentagons to resist HEAP missiles. Allegedly the ‘plane’ (whose wings totally disintegrated, remember), drove straight through three of those layers of concrete and steel like an arrow, drilling a tunnel deep inside before exploding. I’m not saying it was a High Explosive Armour Piercing Missile, just that the damage is not consistent with a plane.

It’s a fortress. The notion that it only has a garrison since 9/11… sure, ok. Official records tell us that there is no garrison, no infantry, no air defences at the Pentagon. Sure, I’ll buy that.

Remember when the British govt denied the existence of the SAS and MI6? The US still denies the existence of Delta Force (they’re the elite presidential guard; they wear raybans as part of the uniform, no joke). Military personnel at the Pentagon? What a strange idea.

The argument about shooting planes down over cities and the PR effect is a good one; the idea that Pentagon is less well defended than any army base of equivalent size though… no, I can’t credit that. On SAM sites; they’re either buried in minibunkers on wooded hills, or the man-launched missiles are kept in the armoury. Standard design for an armoury (at least for British military) is a buried concrete room, a solid steel cell door, and a steel cage inside the room bracing the walls; they’re very secure, what with the armed guards and alarms and all.

The question I’d raise on shooting down the plane or not; why didn’t they shoot down the Camp David plane? Besides the obvious fact that it crashed when passengers stormed the cockpit. Note that I’m not for a moment denying the planes or the incident; what I’m saying is that the orders came from within the US govt. No, obviously most of the people involved wouldn’t have known, or the truth really would be out there already. But governments have performed false flag attacks before (Hitler, Reichstag), and as I said at the outset, I don’t believe that the Taliban have either the ability or indeed the motivation to attack the US. They arrived in Afghanistan as US mercenaries, for one, having been hired off the Saudis.

OC: The physical construction of the Pentagon demonstrates the symbolic power of the American military, but it is nevertheless just a glorified office, full of paper shufflers and people getting home by five to pick up their kids etc.

What’s so great about conspiracy theorists is that they all seem to be experts in plane design, building design, civil engineering, architecture, explosive effects, physics, chemistry, metallurgy etc.

Weren’t we just saying just the other day that most people don’t have a clue what gravity is? So how come we’re all experts on the precise effects of unprecedented explosions in places and situations that have never been tested before? Most people have no idea what a plane does when it hits a building like the Pentagon – what makes any uninformed person think they know? Since when have we had any empirical data? A computer simulation of what happened looked perfectly plausible…one of the first things that happened was that the wings started disintegrating and folding into the fuselage.

The Pentagon isn’t a functional military site – it’s not on the frontline of anything. It’s a building in the capital of the USA where bureaucrats go. It has minimal defences because there are minimal threats to it. Until not so long ago, you could walk up to the front door of Downing Street or the White House. Does Langley have Sam missiles all around it? FBI HQ? Capitol Hill? The White House?

Naval headquarters? Air Fleet HQ? Delta Force HQ? Marines HQ? Submarine HQ? Do the Americans have unlimited budgets for once in a century events? Imagine being the Pentagon’s SAM missile operator from 1960 to 2001? I bet he wrote very long novels!

Remember Pearl Harbour? That happened while America was profoundly alarmed about Japanese intentions and a full-scale war was raging in Europe, yet still they were caught sleeping. So much for security.

9/11 was an “under-the-radar” low-tech attack that took a superpower by surprise. America was always a target for Muslims because of its absurd support of Israel. It was logical it would be targeted.

CT: I don’t actually have the Pentagon blueprints to hand; I’m going on a documentary I saw and what seems like common sense in defending the US Military HQ, e.g. SAM sites and a garrison. Naval headquarters, Air Force HQ, Delta Force HQ? Marines HQ, Submarine HQ… yes, they would have SAM sites. The White House might, the others probably don’t. Downing Street doesn’t, but there are several garrisons of infantry within rapid response range, who would have access to LAW Rockets, which are standard issue to the British Army Infantryman.

OC: No one said the Pentagon was undefended. The point was that until 9/11 it had little more than police-level perimeter security. You couldn’t walk in without authorization, obviously. But it would be a complete waste of tax dollars to heavily defend installations that are unlikely ever to come under a concerted attack by a major hostile force unless an actual war were in progress. Seriously, do you think every possible target should be heavily defended at all times egardless of the likelihood of an attack? Part of the CT analysis is hat everyone has unlimited budgets and resources. They don’t. Look at the MI5 and MI6 HQs. There’s no sign of heavy security. They have nothing more than a few security men hanging around. Who would want their taxes spent on loads of guys who never have to do anything?!

So, why did the US government attack the Pentagon then? What was the point? Why not leave it as just the Twin Towers if they wanted to perform a false flag attack?

The White House/Capitol Hill, the Pentagon and the Twin Towers are exactly what I would attack if I were a Muslim fanatic. I would do the Twin Towers on their own if I were a false flagger conspirator. The more targets, the bigger the operation has to be, and the higher the chances of it being compromised. There was simply no sensible point in attacking the Pentagon as well.

CT: Good point, not every military or government building is a ‘hard-target’; but HQs, such as the Pentagon or MI6 will be very secure. Even the normal level of defence at a police station is extreme; most large UK police stations have armouries and ALL American ones do, alongside all their riot gear. So even minimal police-force security is a pretty tough nut to crack; even turning down the security level at the Pentagon way below what I think is feasible, we’re still talking Military Police, which means that their men are soldiers and their riot gear includes rocket launchers.

And I know that for a fact. Even for prestige value, the Pentagon would warrant top-notch security, certainly enough to mobilise a response. The most effective argument you’ve come up with, and that I am considering, is that strategically it would be better to take the hit and then retaliate with full public support.

OC: Imagine it’s August, 2001. An unknown number of hijacked aircraft are in London airspace. Air traffic control have been ordered to ground every plane. No one’s sure who the hijackers are, where they’re going, what they want or what they’re going to do. No clear instructions are coming from Downing Street. Confusion reigns.

There are rumours flying everywhere. An aircraft is detected heading straight towards Parliament. You’re seriously telling me that you think some soldier/cop/security guard is going to pop out of a guardroom in Parliament with a rocket launcher and, without any orders from the highest possible level, shoot down a commercial jet with hundreds of people in it? That’s just madness. It would never happen. NEVER.

That kind of decision is way beyond any soldier’s pay grade. Imagine if he called it wrong?!! The scenario you envisage is impossible on every level. No one at the Pentagon on 9/11 would ever have done what you suggest.

No soldier would have contemplated firing missiles at a civilian plane. Would YOU shoot down a plane without direct orders?! The plane came in really fast, at ground level. There was virtually no time to react. No one knew for sure what was going on.

An order to shoot down a commercial plane would have to come from Bush, Cheney or Rumsfeld – and they were all getting rushed to safe zones while the Pentagon attack was going down. Our idiot western leaders are so inept and indecisive that they didn’t know what to do. Remember Michael Moore’s famous footage of Bush sitting in the classroom? That’s what a clown way out of his depth looks like – and his entire administration were every bit as inept.

PR had nothing to do with it – it was just sheer confusion and incompetence …headless chickens running around.

Of course governments are wicked and are conspiring against the people – just common sense as you say…but they can’t manage anything sophisticated. Their conspiracies are mostly about feathering their own nests…not blowing up their own citizens (though they would if they absolutely had to!).

The first Twin Towers attack by a Muslim nut proves that the Muslims were very interested in bringing down the Twin Towers. That was their dry run.

And think of this – the British police are so inept that they shot dead a completely innocent man in Stockwell underground station. Every part of the Stockwell operation demonstrated staggering ineptitude. And you think people like that, and their American counterparts, can manage elaborate conspiracies? This is fantasy land. Anyone who was part of a conspiracy would spill the beans in a best-selling book and be on Oprah Winfrey. You can’t keep a conspiracy as huge as that secret. Hundreds of people would have known about it. Someone would have talked.
__________

Tower 5:

OC: So, what about Tower 5?

Tower 5 was not hit by a plane, and, unlike Tower 7, it didn’t collapse (but was demolished later). Clearly (in videos of the building), a huge and intense fire is raging. The enormous fireballs that erupted from the twin towers obviously set fire to buildings all around. Why wouldn’t they?

You can’t argue that all skyscraper fires are the same. How do you know if the materials used were the same, or the heights of the skyscrapers, or the base areas, or the tolerances, or any special design features? There are loads of factors involved. The fact that no one fought the fire is another huge point. Also, the collapse of the twotowers must have sent massive shockwaves through the whole site. It would have been the equivalent of a strong localized earthquake. The foundations of all the towers in the area would have received a devastating shock. How do you know what such a shock would do to a building already with strong fires blazing in its core?

No one on earth would know in advance what effects the 9/11 circumstances would have. These are things that need to be studied by engineers, architects, scientists, demolition experts – not by a bunch of paranoid CTers with no technical qualifications but very fertile minds. This CT stuff makes a complete mockery of the scientific method.

Science progresses by experts carefully collecting data, forming hypotheses, testing them and verifying them, refining where necessary. It doesn’t involve non-experts with an axe to grind trying to look at anomalous photos and videos and saying – “Look, that can’t be right!” That’s more like how religions work – people who can see the face of Jesus in a slice of toast etc!!

It’s surprising that you didn’t mention that the CIA/FBI or some such other organization had offices in Tower 7.

CT: I don’t know about Tower 5, but it looks like enough fire damage to warrant demolishing afterwards. And engineers have come forward, a good number of them, to testify that skyscrapers don’t fall down from fire or earthquakes; they’re built to resist both. Notice no one questions that the tower withstood impacts from planes; that didn’t bring them down, but apparently burning jet fuel did. Again; jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel.
__________

Tower 7:

CT: Tower 7 wasn’t hit by a plane. It wasn’t even on fire. What’s far fetched is that it collapsed at all. Somehow, the tax records for the Enron scandal happened to disintegrate in the freak collapse, which just happened, completely coincidentally, at the same time as the, ahem, terrorist attack.

OC: What is far-fetched about this account of Tower 7?…

“On August 21, 2008, NIST released its draft report on the causes of the collapse of 7 World Trade Center, beginning a period for public comments. In its investigation, NIST utilized ANSYS to model events leading up to collapse initiation and LS-DYNA models to simulate the global response to the initiating events. NIST determined that diesel fuel did not play an important role, nor did the structural damage from the collapse of the twin towers. But the lack of water to fight the fire was an important factor. The fires burned out of control during the afternoon, including on floor 13, where a critical interior column buckled. With the buckling of that column, adjacent columns also failed along with the floor structure above. This triggered a vertical progression of floor failures to the roof. The collapse then progressed east-to-west across the structure, and ultimately the entire structure collapsed. The fires, fuelled by office contents, along with the lack of water, were the key reasons for the collapse.”
__________

In Summary:

There is no smoking gun. There is no hard evidence. The logic of the alleged false flag conspiracy theory is absurd. None of it makes sense. The official version is much more plausible. Occam’s Razor supports the official version. To be opposed to the Old World Order does not mean that you should accuse them of everything under the sun. They are vile, dangerous, greedy, evil people, but that doesn’t mean that they carried out 9/11. The OWO knew 9/11 was coming and did nothing about it.

That was their crime, and it is an extremely serious one for which they should be held to account. Instead, they have been let off the hook by all the ridiculous claims of the “Truth Movement”. There is every reason to believe that the CIA started the “Truth Movement” as a means to distract people from asking the serious question: why was a red carpet laid out for terrorists? There were many opportunities to stop 9/11 and none were taken. Why not? Because the government wanted a pretext to launch a Middle East war. That is the true scandal.

******

We are often asked about 9/11. Was the American government involved, or not?
__________

Acts of Omission:

If we were to say that the American government took no explicit part in any conspiracy to kill its own citizens, would that indicate that the American government had no culpability? There are several ways to skin a cat. Governments often choose to use the tactic of omission rather than commission. In other words, rather than do something themselves, they wait for their enemy to do it, and deliberately omit to take the steps necessary to prevent it. They know it is about to happen, but they choose not to stop it because it is, in fact, precisely what they want.

If one asks the most important question of all in any conspiracy scenario – cui bono? (to whose benefit?) – one can see that numerous American neocon foreign policy and economic objectives were satisfied in the aftermath of 9/11.

Acts of omission are almost impossible to prove. Incompetence and negligence are always cited rather than conscious intent on the part of a government to allow the slaughter of its own citizens to take place Therefore, governments frequently employ this tactic. It permits “plausible deniability”.

No one should forget that the CIA had extensive contacts with the mujahedeen during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, and provided them with arms and intelligence. It is inconceivable that they did not come into contact with such a prominent figure as Osama bin Laden, and many of the future leaders of the Taliban. Either the CIA are one of the most inept organisations on earth, (they aren’t!) or they were well aware of what was happening in Afghanistan. In which case, why did they do nothing?

During WWII, the British broke German secret codes. Several times, they permitted disastrous events to happen, with thousands of their own people dying, even though they could have stopped any of those disasters. But to stop them would have alerted the Germans that their codes had been cracked. The ‘greater good’ dictated that it was preferable for innocent citizens to be killed than for the enemy to learn that its secret codes had been compromised. Be in no doubt – governments are always prepared to sacrifice their own citizens if they think it is in the greater interest of their policy aims. No one is protecting you. Your lives are dispensable.
__________

4/9

It is estimated that lawyers and administrators working on the winding down of the American and international operations of Lehman Brothers investment bank will eventually reach $4 billion. Nice money for the vultures feeding on the carcass. Why should any bank be allowed to reach the scale where it costs billions simply to shut it down? All of these banking leviathans should be broken up into much smaller units.

9/11 was caused by American support for Zionism. There would have been no 9/11 and no “War on Terror” if America had adopted the sensible position of remaining neutral in relation to Israel. Zionism has been a catastrophe for America, dragging it into costly wars that have made it one of the most unpopular nations in the world, just as Israel is for its war crimes against the Palestinians. Gaza is effectively a concentration camp, or a walled-up ghetto just like the ones the Jews hemselves were once forced to endure by the Nazis.

“Truthers” often condemn us for not taking their side over 9/11.

Let’s be clear about this. Anyone who seriously thinks that Mossad or he CIA/FBI/Special Forces carried out 9/11 rather than fanatical Muslims on a martyrdom operation is a nutcase.

The Bush government was an abomination. Zionism is an ongoing abomination. That does not mean that 9/11 was an American or Jewish operation. People seem to forget that Islamic fundamentalism is also an abomination and is one of the most dangerous and evil forces in the modern world. Muslims have carried out thousands of suicide martyrdom operations in the last forty years. Muslims have hijacked many planes in the last forty years. 9/11 was a martyrdom operation involving planes hijacked by Muslim fanatics. What’s hard to understand? Everything about 9/11 fitted the precise modus operandi of Islamic radicals. Nothing about it fitted the modus operandi of the CIA/FBI/Mossad. Two plus two equals four, unless you can’t count.

Why would anyone in their right mind see 9/11 as anything other than extremist Muslims attacking America for its support of Zionism? Two plus two.

The Muslim extremists who carried out 9/11 had:

1) the motive (hatred of America’s pro-Zionist, anti-Islamic foreign policy).

2) the motivation (a chance to heroically strike back against America and, above, all, to become martyrs).

3) the means (hijacking planes with box cutters and fake bombs).

4) the money (supplied by Osama bin Laden, a very wealthy Arab).

5) the organization (all of the resources of Al Qaeda were put at their disposal).

6) the opportunity (they had lived in America for months beforehand, taking flying lessons).

7) the surprise (no such operation had ever been undertaken before; America was completely unprepared).

8) the track record (thousands of Muslims had carried out suicide bombings; 9/11 simply used hijacked planes as the suicide bombs).

9) the precedent (in 1994 – seven years before 9/11 – Muslim suicide bombers from Algeria hijacked a plane and intended to crash it into the centre of Paris; they were killed by French Special Forces. The 9/11 gang learned all of the lessons of this first bungled attempt.)

10) the prior attempt (in 1993, Muslim fanatics had previously tried to blow up the Twin Towers with a van bomb: this was their No.1 global target).

If that isn’t persuasive enough, what about this list (courtesy of Wikipedia) of Islamic terrorist attacks in the last two decades:

1) 26 February 1993 – World Trade Center bombing, New York City. 6 killed.

2) March 1993 – Bombay bombings. Mumbai, India. 250 dead, 700 injured.

3) 28 July 1994 – Buenos Aires, Argentina. Vehicle suicide bombing attack against AMIA building, the local Jewish community representation. 85 dead, more than 300 injured.

4) 24 December 1994 – Air France Flight 8969 hijacking in Algiers by 3 members of Armed Islamic Group of Algeria and another terrorist. 7 killed including 4 hijackers.

5) 25 June 1996 – Khobar Towers bombing, 20 killed, 372 wounded.

6) 17 November 1997 – Luxor attack, 6 armed Islamic terrorists attack tourists at Egypt’s famous Luxor Ruins. 68 foreign tourists killed.

7) 14 February 1998 – Bombing in Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. 13 bombs explode within a 12 km radius. 46 killed and over 200 injured.

8) 7 August 1998 – 1998 United States embassy bombings in Tanzania and Kenya. 224 dead. 4000+ injured.

9) 4 September 1999 – A series of bombing attacks in several cities of Russia, nearly 300 killed.

10) 12 October 2000 – Attack on the USS Cole in the Yemeni port of Aden.

11) 11 September 2001 – 4 planes hijacked and crashed into World Trade Center and The Pentagon by 19 hijackers. Nearly 3000 dead.

12) 13 December 2001 – Suicide attack on Indian parliament in New Delhi by Pakistan-based Islamist terrorist organizations, Jaish-EMohammad and Lashkar-e-Toiba. Aimed at eliminating the top leadership of India and causing anarchy in the country. 7 dead, 12 injured.

13) 27 March 2002 – Suicide bomb attack on a Passover Seder in a Hotel in Netanya, Israel. 30 dead, 133 injured.

14) 30 March 2002 and 24 November 2002 – Attacks on the Hindu Raghunath temple, India. Total 25 dead.

15) 7 May 2002 – Bombing in al-Arbaa, Algeria. 49 dead, 117 injured.

16) 24 September 2002 – Machine Gun attack on Hindu temple in Ahmedabad, India. 31 dead, 86 injured.

17) 12 October 2002 – Bombing in Bali nightclub. 202 killed, 300 injured.

18) 16 May 2003 – Casablanca Attacks – 4 simultaneous attacks in Casablanca killing 33 civilians (mostly Moroccans) carried by Salafia Jihadia.

19) 11 March 2004 – Multiple bombings on trains near Madrid, Spain. 191 killed, 1460 injured (alleged link to Al-Qaeda).

20) 1 September 2004 – Beslan school hostage crisis, approximately 344 civilians including 186 children killed.

21) 2 November 2004 – The murder of Theo van Gogh (film director) by Amsterdam-born jihadist Mohammed Bouyeri.

22) 4 February 2005 – Muslim terrorists attacked the Christian community in Demsa, Nigeria, killing 36 people, destroying property and displacing an additional 3000 people.

23) 5 July 2005 – Attack at the Hindu Ram temple at Ayodhya, India; one of the most holy sites of Hinduism. 6 dead.

24) 7 July 2005 – Multiple bombings in London Underground. 52 killed by four suicide bombers. Nearly 700 injured.

25) 23 July 2005 – Bomb attacks at Sharm el-Sheikh, an Egyptian resort city, at least 64 people killed.

26) 29 October 2005 – 29 October 2005 Delhi bombings, India. Over 60 killed and over 180 injured in a series of three attacks in crowded markets and a bus, just 2 days before the Diwali festival.

27) 9 November 2005 – 2005 Amman bombings. A series of coordinated suicide attacks on hotels in Amman, Jordan. Over 60 killed and 115 injured. Four attackers including a husband and wife team were involved.

28) 7 March 2006 – 2006 Varanasi bombings, India. A series of attacks in the Sankath Mochan Hanuman temple and Cantonment Railway Station in the Hindu holy city of Varanasi. 28 killed and over 100 injured.

29) 11 July 2006 – 11 July 2006 Mumbai train bombings, Mumbai, India; a series of seven bomb blasts that took place over a period of 11 minutes on the Suburban Railway in Mumbai. 209 killed and over 700 injured.

30) 14 August 2007 – Qahtaniya bombings: Four suicide vehicle bombers massacred nearly 800 members of northern Iraq’s Yazidi sect in the deadliest Iraq war’s attack to date.

31) 26 July 2008 – 2008 Ahmedabad bombings, India. Islamic terrorists detonate at least 21 explosive devices in the heart of this industrial capital, leaving at least 56 dead and 200 injured. A Muslim group calling itself the Indian Mujahideen claims responsibility.

Indian authorities believe that extremists with ties to Pakistan and/or Bangladesh are likely responsible and are intent on inciting communal violence. Investigation by Indian police led to the eventual arrest of a number of terrorists suspected of carrying out the blasts, most of whom belong to a well-known terrorist group, The Students Islamic Movement of India.

32) 13 September 2008 – Bombing series in Delhi, India. Pakistani extremist groups plant bombs at several places including India Gate, out of which the ones at Karol Bagh, Connaught Place and Greater Kailash explode leaving around 30 people dead and 130 injured, followed by another attack two weeks later at the congested Mehrauli area, leaving 3 people dead.

33) 26 November 2008 – Muslim extremists kill at least 174 people and wound numerous others in a series of coordinated attacks on India’s largest city and financial capital, Mumbai. A group calling itself the Deccan Mujahedeen claims responsibility, however, the government of India suspects Islamic terrorists based in Pakistan are responsible. Ajmal Kasab, one of the terrorists, was caught alive.

34) 25 October 2009. Baghdad, Iraq. During a terrorist attack, two bomber vehicles detonated in the Green Zone, killing at least 155 people and injuring 520.

35) 28 October 2009 – Peshawar, Pakistan. A car bomb is detonated in a woman exclusive shopping district, and over 110 killed and over 200 injured.

36) 5 November 2009 – Fort Hood shooting, Texas, USA. U.S. Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan, an American Muslim of Palestinian descent, shot and killed 13 people and wounded 30 others at a U.S. Army base.

37) 3 December 2009 – Mogadishu, Somalia. A male suicide bomber disguised as a woman detonates in a hotel meeting hall. The hotel was hosting a graduation ceremony for local medical students when the blast went off, killing four government ministers as well as other civilians.

38) 25 December 2009 – Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab (also referred to as Umar Abdul Mutallab and Omar Farooq al-Nigeri; born December 22, 1986, in Lagos, Nigeria) is a Muslim Nigerian citizen who attempted to detonate plastic explosives hidden in his underwear while on board Northwest Airlines Flight 253, en route from Amsterdam to Detroit, Michigan, on December 25, 2009. He was subsequently charged on six criminal counts, including attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction and attempted murder of 289 people.

39) 1 January 2010 – Lakki Marwat, Pakistan. A suicide car bomber drove his explosive-laden vehicle into a volleyball pitch as people gathered to watch a match killing more than 100 people.

40) 1 May 2010 – New York, New York, USA. Faisal Shahzad, an Islamic Pakistani American who received U.S. citizenship in December 2009, attempted to detonate a car bomb in Times Square working with the Pakistani Taliban or Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan.

41) 28 May 2010 – Attacks on Ahmadi Mosques Lahore, Pakistan. Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan claimed attacks on two mosques simultaneously belonging to the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, killing nearly 100 and injuring many others.

Were these all the work of the CIA and Mossad? If not, then why does anyone think Muslim extremist were incapable of carrying out 9/11? If it looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck then it’s a duck! 9/11 bore all of the hallmarks of Islamic terrorism. It was entirely in accord with previous Islamic terrorist operations, it was entirely in accord with Islamic threats against America, and it was entirely consistent with all known data concerning Islamic terrorism.

So, why is all of this so difficult for “Truthers” to understand and accept? Why is it more credible that Mossad or American special forces did it (as part of an elaborate American-Zionist government conspiracy) given the overwhelming and prima facie evidence that it was perpetrated by Muslim Jihadists who had carried out a host of extremely violent attacks against Western targets?

America believed that its fanatical support for Zionism was consequence-free. America thought it was immune from attack on home soil. 9/11 showed that the American understanding of the global political situation could not have been any more simplistic and deluded. The American government was asking for trouble and got it in buckets.

Only people with a pathological hatred of the very principle of government would blame government for everything. If you are an ally of the Tea Party, you are no ally of ours. If you are an ally of Osama bin Laden, you are no ally of ours. If you are an ally of anarcho-capitalist libertarianism, you are no ally of ours.

So, make your mind up – whose side are you on? Islam? Anarchy? Capitalism? Libertarianism? Or meritocracy – good government in the name of the people.

American support of Zionism is the real issue of 9/11. The idea that on 9/11 the American government hijacked four planes (via remote control or suicidal agents in no need of a pension) and flew them into three targets (but screwed up with the fourth – great plan, guys) is so comical you would need to have taken leave of your senses to believe it for even one second. Sure, it’s always worthwhile to raise the possibility that the government might have done it, but if the evidence just isn’t there then the conspiracy theory has to be abandoned. That’s the rational approach. But the irrationally minded will cling to the theory no matter what.

Many persuasive arguments were put forward to suggest that the American moon landings were faked, but a scientist went through every single point and refuted them all one by one, showing exactly how the fallacies had arisen. If you are a Gnostic, you pursue knowledge. If you are a “believer”, you don’t care about knowledge, about facts, about evidence. 9/11 Truthers are believers. Whatever happened to their internal Devil’s Advocate?

Never forget Occam’s razor – the simplest explanation is usually correct. “Do not multiply entities unnecessarily.” The amount of “entities” that need to be multiplied to make 9/11 a government plot is astronomical. Bad governments should be held accountable for the many crimes they DID commit, not the imaginary ones they didn’t. The Tea Party are crazy, racist, anarcho-capitalist libertarians, obsessed with imagined government conspiracies. They despise government in principle.

We despise bad government, but we are not against government per se. We are advocates of strong, effective, wise, meritocratic government. Increasingly, we are repulsed by all mention of conspiracy theories because their most fervent advocates are usually members of the Tea Party. The Tea Party regard government as an intrinsic conspiracy against the people.

The Tea Party are extremely dangerous anarchists who want America and the world to become like the old Wild West. They want a restoration of fundamentalist Christian values, the right to go around armed to the teeth, and the right to engage in unregulated ultra capitalism where markets and private corporations dictate everything. These people are every bit as dangerous as the OWO. In fact they overlap with the OWO in numerous places.

“Truthers” and the Tea Party are virtually synonymous. Their agenda is to undermine the concept of government in order to replace it with their anarcho-capitalism. Why does no one ask questions about their conspiracy? They are massively motivated to blame the government for everything.

It’s one thing to oppose the corrupt, self-serving Washington D.C. establishment, it’s quite another to want to replace government with capitalist markets based on profit-driven, unaccountable private corporations, to replace “Big Government” with “Big Business”. You’d better make sure you know what side you’re on, and for what reasons. It’s not true that your enemy’s enemy is always your friend. Sometimes they can be your enemy too. The Tea Party, just as much as the OWO, represents everything to which we are opposed.

The Philosopher King of the Tea Party is a dead Austrian economist called Friedrich Hayek, a ferocious enemy of the power of the state. His most famous work is The Road to Serfdom in which he argues that under big government we become serfs (he is silent on what we are under big business; worker drones perhaps?). It is now being treated as a holy text. It was a favourite work of the two members of the Old World Order who kick started the recent massive increase in the OWO’s power: Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan.

Thatcher, a truly evil individual, is infamous for saying, “There is no such thing as society.” That is indeed the core position of libertarianism. It’s all about families and individuals operating with ruthless self-interest to try to create a competitive advantage for themselves. It’s the creed of privilege and power. It’s the gospel of hate towards others. In short, it’s the Gospel of Satan.

The OWO are two-faced. They support big government if it’s advancing their agenda and controlling the servile masses; they hate state power if it encroaches on their “free market” ideology i.e. their rigged, unregulated cartels. The state is in fact an OWO compromise. If they could get away with doing without it, they would. They need it as part of the illusion of “freedom and democracy”.

Big government is indeed a catastrophe if it resembles what goes on in Washington D.C. – a puppet administration of the OWO, up for sale to the highest bidder, packed with the incompetent beneficiaries of cronyism, nepotism and privilege. But big government of the people and for the people, and operated by the most meritorious of the people is the means to deliver people permanently from serfdom.

Texan Republican Ron Paul, a libertarian presidential candidate at the 2008 election is a huge fan of Hayek. So is his son Rand Paul, Republican Senator for Kentucky. Paul junior is on record as having said that he would not have voted for the Civil Rights Act that outlawed discrimination against African Americans. His justification was that such an Act contravened strict libertarian dogma because it allowed government interference with private business. If a businessman refused to serve blacks, that was his right. What did it have to do with government? Do you agree with that?

Hayek’s book is often bracketed with Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand’s monstrous tribute to the super rich. Rand was of Jewish stock and one of her greatest disciples was Alan Greenspan (another Jew), primary architect of the financial meltdown of 2008. Another libertarian hero is the Jewish economist Milton Friedman.

Libertarianism is a highly Jewish ideology. For Jews, such an ideology is perhaps understandable since they have a natural revulsion towards state power since it has often been savagely directed against them. Of course, the Zionist-controlled media is more than happy to espouse the libertarian message: more power for Zionist billionaires; less power for any government that seeks to control and regulate Zionist banks and interests. All supporters of libertarianism are, whether they know it or not, serving the agenda of the Zionist super rich against the interests of the people.

Libertarianism is the real mechanism by which the Old World Order hope to seize global control. Libertarianism goes hand in hand with unregulated globalisation: reducing the world’s population to serfdom and slavery in service of the Old Masters – the Old World Order.

Everyone who supports Hayek, Rand, Friedman, and libertarianism is an enemy of the people. Libertarianism is a codeword for racism, Zionism, and ultra capitalism. All supporters of the Old World Order subscribe to it.

The libertarians of extreme right wing, racist organisations such as the Tea Party are the shock troops of the OWO, their foot soldiers and water carriers. They are the storm troopers of fascist rule by the Power Elite. We welcome the condemnation of such vile people; if they supported us in any way we would know we were doing something disastrously wrong.

The 9/11 “conspiracy” is the ultimate McGuffin – it’s nothing at all. There’s nothing there. It’s a red herring. Its function, though, is very real. It drives a secondary plot and an entirely different narrative. Its true purpose is to undermine the basis of government – any government, government in principle – and to “reveal” all government as a lethal threat to the people, as an eternal conspiracy.

The “Truthers” are anarcho-capitalist libertarians who want to destroy government. They are engaged in a massive and frighteningly dangerous conspiracy to kill government and replace it with enormous corporations acting according to the “market”, and outside any government control or restraint.

In this nightmarish new world, people would be brainwashed drones and droids “owned” by corporate leviathans. There would be no freedom, no hope and no escape. Wake up. See what’s really going on. See past the smoke and mirrors.

Ask yourself that ancient question – cui bono? Who will benefit most from the Truthers’ new model of society? The answer is the same one it has always been: big business, the entrenched elite, the privileged few, the men behind the curtain; in short, the Old World Order. It’s the oldest story ever told. Will we go on being suckers forever? Wake up!
__________

The 9/11 Paradigm:

The 9/11 conspiracy theories should be reclassified as a religion, or, better still, as a mental illness. A person keeps sending web links to us in which various anti-Zionists provide “irrefutable evidence” that Zionists were responsible for 9/11. See, for example:

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/soci…/sociopol_911zion.htm

Of course, their “evidence” is always laughable and just reveals how crazy and irrational they are. There is literally nothing that could persuade the “Truthers” to change their mind and accept the selfevident facts.

9/11 is astoundingly simple. Only one thing needs to be known: that four American planes were hijacked and used as suicide bombs by their hijackers. Everything that happened subsequently flowed from that incontestable fact, the sine qua non for everything else. So, who would hijack an American plane and then be willing to give his life to use it as a weapon of war against prominent American targets, resulting in indefinite numbers of innocent Americans being slaughtered? Obviously, it would be an agent of Mossad or the CIA!

After all, they’re famous for their suicide hijacking operations and desire for martyrdom. The CIA and Mossad are notorious despisers of American civilians, and are only too keen to massacre them in vast numbers. They’ve long harboured a pathological hatred of America. Or have I gone fucking insane?!!!

Without any conceivable question, 9/11 was carried out by 19 of the legions of Muslim maniacs who detest America, and who love suicide operations as the martyr’s fast track to paradise. Probably ten thousand Muslims have participated in suicide operations over the years. Number of CIA or Mossad agents who have taken part in suicide operations? – ZERO!

All of the hijackers were identified. They were all well-known Muslim fanatics who attended jihadist training camps in Afghanistan. Air stewardesses on the planes (all of whom died) used onboard phones to say exactly what was happening and who was doing it (they gave the seat numbers of the hijackers).

The heavily accented voices of the hijackers in the cockpits were recorded. Flight 93 was brought down because of a passenger uprising. The passengers were fully aware of what had happened to the other planes because their family and friends on the ground were telling them in phone calls. The Flight 93 passengers were not trying to attack suicidal Mossad or CIA agents, but Muslim fanatics wearing red martyrdom bandanas around their heads. The Muslim hijacker pilots had all attended American flying schools in the previous months. That’s exactly what you would expect as part of an elaborate CIA and Mossad suicide plot, isn’t it? In 1993, in another well-known CIA/Mossad plot, a van bomb was used to try to blow up the Twin Towers. Or was it another bunch of Muslim maniacs who were responsible?

In 1994, the CIA/Mossad hijacked a plane in Algeria, intending to crash it into the heart of Paris. French Special Forces killed these CIA/Mossad agents. Or was it in fact another gang of Muslim crazies that got gunned down?

The London bombing and the Madrid bombing – obviously carried out by the CIA, Mossad and the British and Spanish Intelligence services and not by Muslim psychopaths who left martyrdom videos bragging about what they had done and giving warning of more attacks to come. The many terrorist attacks against Russia – Mossad, the CIA and the Russian intelligence service were self-evidently the guilty parties and not the hordes of Muslims who despise Russian rule and have been waging war against Russia for decades.

There are certain incontrovertible facts: Muslims love peace and never harm anyone; no Muslim has ever taken part in a suicide operation; no Muslim has ever hijacked a plane; no Muslim has ever hated the Americans or Europeans; no Muslim has ever targeted the twin Towers. Anyone who says that Muslims carried out 9/11 is clearly a member of Mossad or the CIA. Muslims love the West.

At least that’s what the demented Truthers think. Our correspondent talks about the “truth”. Not that he cares what it is. Like many people, he knows what the conclusion is that he desires, and nothing as inconvenient as a fact will dissuade him from marching straight to that conclusion. He will hunt high and low for material to support his delusion, and ignore everything that contradicts it. This is the trademark way that Christians, Jews, Muslims, Creationists etc operate. These are “Mythos” (story) people who have never been troubled by rational Logos thinking. Actually, they’re not capable of exhibiting reason or logic. They are locked into feelings and sensations. They have their 9/11 paradigm that shapes how they understand the world, and they will never abandon it. They can’t. It has become part of their identity.

We are opposed to Zionism, the State of Israel, American support for Zionism and Israel, and the Zionist lobby in America. Yet we will not stoop to accusing Zionists of crimes they didn’t commit when the guilty parties have been caught red-handed.

To the person who keeps writing to us – why don’t you join Al Qaeda? Don’t visit our site again. Go and plague someone else with your conspiracy theories. For two thousand years and more, Abrahamists have bought into irrational garbage. Two thousand years from now the Religion of 9/11 will still be going strong. Why? Because the earth is a mental asylum, full of people unable to think rationally.

Muslim maniacs and their fellow travellers have claimed that the Madrid bombing was ordered by the Spanish government and the London bombing by the British government. Why should anyone be surprised that they blamed the Zionists and Americans for 9/11? It’s what they do – blame others – and there are always credulous fools willing to believe them because they have their own axe to grind. There are hundreds of Muslims in jails all over Europe, all caught plotting acts of horrific violence against the West. Only the most deluded people on earth would imagine that Western governments fabricated all of this. Go to a radicalised mosque and you will hear imams calling for all infidels to be killed and for all good Muslims to martyr themselves in a global jihad. Are these secret CIA and Mossad imams? Get fucking real.

9/11 was one act amongst a whole campaign of Islamic jihadist terrorism that has been going on for decades in scores of countries. Only people who don’t have a clue about the history of jihadism could imagine that 9/11 couldn’t possibly have been done by jihadists. It’s ALL they’ve been doing for decades.

Anyone who says that 9/11 was perpetrated by Zionists and Americans is a friend and ally of Al Qaeda, Islamic jihad, and global Sharia Law. Zionists and the American government are guilty of innumerable crimes. 9/11 isn’t one of them.

Go to YouTube and have a look at the martyrdom video of Shehzad Tanweer – “CIA/Mossad Agent” (according to the logic of 9/11 conspiracy theorists) who murdered seven innocent people in a suicide bomb attack on London Underground on 7/7/2005. THAT’s the enemy, not the CIA.

During the Cold War, the Americans chose to help the Afghani jihadists – the future Taliban – against the Soviets. Once allies, the Americans and Taliban are now the bitterest of enemies. Donald Rumsfeld was famously pictured shaking hands with Saddam Hussein, and America gave massive aid to Iraq during its war with Iran (another hated enemy of America). So, according to conspiracy theory logic, Saddam Hussein was a CIA agent! Therefore, Saddam Hussein participated in the 9/11 conspiracy even though it resulted in his overthrow and death!

Don’t laugh – that’s the level of rationality the conspiracy theorists operate at. They look for any compromising photographs, snippets of information, hearsay, rumours, coincidences etc. and build them into an enormous edifice that contains so much data that it might seem impressive on first glance. On second glance, it’s like the Ptolemaic model of the solar system – extremely complicated and utter nonsense.

And never forget this: not a single particle of evidence has ever inked Iraq to 9/11. So, this “brilliant” conspiracy, whose purpose was llegedly to allow America to justify an invasion of Iraq to grab its oil and provide regional support for Israel, did not fulfil even its first bjective – to attribute blame for 9/11 to the nation about to be attacked. Was this the most inept conspiracy in history? Or are theconspiracy theorists who advocate this “conspiracy” the most retarded in history?

The Cabinet Meeting that gave the go-ahead for 9/11

Just consider for a moment that you’re sitting around the Cabinet table of the Israeli Government in 2001. You’re having to decide whether to use Mossad to attack your greatest friend, ally, supporter and funder – America. You will be killing thousands of American citizens. If you are caught, America will not only have to withdraw all support and friendship from you but actually declare war on you. It would mean the end of Israel, the treasure you have protected with such determination for so long. Israel will revert to Palestine once more, and the Jews will never get it back again. And it will be your fault.

You will surely go to hell. Yahweh will declare that the Jews broke the sacred Covenant and brought this fate upon themselves. In a couple of centuries, there will be no Jews left on earth. And all because you madly chose to attack your great benefactor and friend, America, in the most cold-blooded and treacherous way imaginable. And why are you contemplating this insane step? Well, because you want America to attack Iraq. The plan is to covertly attack America while pretending that responsibility lay with Al Qaeda or Iraq (who cares? – they’re all ragheads!), thus creating the excuse for war on Iraq.

According to some scenarios, the American government will actually be helping you to attack their own country – the biggest act of treason in human history. Both you and the Americans have to pray that nothing goes wrong and nothing leaks (may God curse WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, Bradley Manning and all those inclined to spill the beans!). If it does, the governments of Israel and America are both toast – they will be executed for high treason, and Israel will cease to exist.

“And remind us again of why we’re taking the biggest, riskiest and most treacherous gamble in the history of the world, one that will stand as an eternal act of infamy,” say the Israeli Prime Minister and the American President to their advisers as they get ready to give the go-ahead for the diabolical plot. “Because we want a war in Iraq?”

Aren’t there any easier ways, guys? And we have to find 19 Mossad and CIA agents who can be plausibly passed off as Islamic terrorists, and moreover, we need them all to agree to murder thousands of Americans and also commit suicide? Apart from that, we have to rig the Twin Towers for demolition, to take place not when the planes strike but some time later. We also have to demolish some towers that didn’t even get hit by planes! We have to fire a missile at the Pentagon, and then shoot down one of the four planes that we ourselves hijacked. We also have to close down the whole of American airspace. Isn’t that all going to be a bit of a stretch? Then we have to arrange the biggest cover-up in history, involving thousands of people, any one of whom could talk and blow the whole thing? Hmmmmm. I’ll tell you what, guys – you’re all fired!!!!!”

You would have to be literally deranged to believe that the American and Israeli governments ordered Mossad and the CIA to find 19 suicide agents to kill 3,000 Americans, thus creating an excuse for war with Iraq, which wasn’t even implicated in 9/11.

What’s the alternative? 19 Islamic Jihadists working for Al Qaeda, an organization that loathes pro-Zionist America and has attacked American targets all over the world for many years, hijacked four American planes and used them to perform spectacular “martyrdom” operations against the Great Satan. Allahu Akbar!!!

So, which option do you choose? Are you sane or insane? Anyone who continues to say that the governments of Israel and America perpetrated the most heinous act of treason in history for the extremely modest “prize” of war with Iraq is quite simply demented and beyond help. Not one shred of credible evidence has ever been advanced to support the mad hypothesis. No conspiracy theorist has ever explained who the Israeli and CIA agents were who were willing to kill Americans and themselves for the sake of the “plan”. Some have suggested that the planes were flown by remote control (!), thus ignoring all of the evidence from all of the planes, particularly Flight 93, that Muslim hijackers had violently seized the planes and killed passengers with box cutters. All of the hijackers were identified. They were all known jihadists. What the fuck is there to be suspicious about? If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s a duck.

Which two countries do all jihadists loathe? – America and Israel. You think the jihadists weren’t motivated to carry out 9/11? You think the thousands of acts of Islamic terrorism are all covert CIA and Mossad operations to discredit nice, peaceful Muslims who would never hurt a fly? What fucking planet are you living on?!

If you, like George W Bush and his senior Cabinet colleagues, were an extremely wealthy person enjoying the finest life imaginable, would you court disaster, infamy and the death penalty by ordering a covert attack on your own country and fellow citizens – just to create a pretext for attacking foreign countries that have oil you covet? Your fate would be entirely in the hands of the hundreds and thousands of people who would need to be involved in such a mammoth undertaking as 9/11 (if viewed as a Western conspiracy): the White House, Pentagon, Air Traffic Control, the media, CIA, FBI, Mossad, all those involved in the planning of the alleged demolition of the Twin Towers and other buildings, those who allegedly fired a missile at the Pentagon, NYPD and emergency services, Washington police and emergency services etc – any one of who could have blown the whole deal and squealed, with deadly consequences for you and your family.

The truth is that 9/11 conspiracy theorists are nuts who buy into a vision where George W Bush and his confederates aren’t even human. Rather, they are pan-dimensional lizard humans from another world: they despise humanity and they would never breathe a word of the conspiracy because they’re all Reptilians! That’s the only way to make their conspiracy work. Then it becomes airtight (!). The hijackers can become shape-shifting creatures that escaped from the planes into another dimension before the collisions took place. Ah, now it all makes perfect sense!!!

So, was 9/11 carried out by Islamic maniacs using the modus operandi characteristic of Islamic jihadist terrorists for several decades, or was it carried out by alien Reptilians? That’s your choice. And then people wonder why we call “Truthers” crazy! Some people have suggested we should form an alliance of convenience with “Truthers”. You must be joking!
__________

5/9

First off, we should say that all of the junk and complete nonsense we are about to wade through has already been comprehensively debunked at sites such as: www.911myths.com

Clearly, the person who sent us this list has no interest in researching any of the 9/11 debunking sites. There are many websites claiming 9/11 was an inside job and just as many debunking those websites. Our correspondent is the sort of person who avidly reads the “inside job” sites and completely ignores the others. He lives in a fantasy land, not realising that all of the “definitive” evidence he reads about so eagerly has already been totally discredited and rejected.

By and large, we will not be offering the answers to the fifty questions since that has been done exhaustively elsewhere. Instead, we will be concentrating on how moronic these questions are and we will be considering the mentality of the person who compiled the list and those people, like our correspondent, who are taken in by this gibberish. We will adopt a tone of mockery since how else can you show your contempt for the ranting and raving of the lunatics and madmen who have long since departed the rational world.
__________

Fifty questions:

1) How come dead or not dead Osama bin Laden has not been formally indicted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as responsible for 9/11? Is it because the US government – as acknowledged by the FBI itself – has not produced a single conclusive piece of evidence?

That’s because the DBC (the “dastardly and brilliant conspirators”) know that Bin Laden didn’t do it – because THEY did! America has spent billions on pursuing Bin Laden as a complete smokescreen, and they have brilliantly made sure they never actually captured him, because that would prove disastrous. He would expose the whole sordid conspiracy. In fact, he’s actually in the protective custody of the CIA in a special Witness Protection Scheme for “Guilty Men who are not Guilty!”

America has imprisoned hundreds of Muslims in Guantanamo Bay for years. Astoundingly, not one of them has been formally indicted by the FBI. Is that because America doesn’t have a single conclusive piece of evidence against them? Or is because America has chosen to treat them as “unlawful enemy combatants” (denied the right of legal prisoners of war) in an ongoing terrorist war and is detaining them indefinitely as permanently dangerous combatants rather than as people to be processed by the American criminal justice system?

(Note: as of May, 2011, Al Qaeda acknowledged that the Americans successfully assassinated Bin Laden in Pakistan.)

2) How could all the alleged 19 razor-blade box cutter-equipped Muslim perpetrators have been identified in less than 72 hours – without even a crime scene investigation?

What?! It took the DBC that long? But surely the DBC had all of the details of the conspirators already – after all, they picked them!

In fact, all of the perpetrators were identified DURING the hijackings – the air stewardesses used the phones on the planes to provide the seat numbers of the hijackers to the authorities. Who the fuck needs a crime scene? Jack Ruby was identified within seconds of assassinating Lee Harvey Oswald. No one had carried out the required crime scene investigation!!! Unacceptable!

3) How come none of the 19’s names appeared on the passenger lists released the same day by both United Airlines and American Airlines?

Er, on the one hand it’s being suggested that the perpetrators were conveniently identified by the DBC within 72 hours without a crime scene investigation; now it’s being asserted that the DBC were so dumb that they hadn’t even worked out who they were going to finger for the crime, hence inserted the names afterwards. Are these the dumbest conspirators in history? They didn’t have their stooges and patsies ready to take the blame. This, of course, is the first thing to which conspirators attend. You must have someone to blame – that’s the whole point of the conspiracy.

In fact, because the hijackers were fully known, they were deliberately excluded from the passenger lists because they were murderers, not passengers. An entirely appropriate step to take, wouldn’t you say? The 7/7 bombers in London aren’t listed amongst the dead for exactly the same reason.

4) How come eight names on the “original” FBI list happened to be found alive and living in different countries?

How many John Smiths are in the world? How many people use fake identities? How many fake passports are in the world?

5) Why would pious jihadi Mohammed Atta leave a how-to-fly video manual, a uniform and his last will inside his bag knowing he was on a suicide mission?

Eh?!! Is he supposed to leave his last will in his hotel room for the cleaners to find?

Atta’s bags did not make it onto Flight 11 because his earlier flight from Portland was delayed. They were found later at Logan International Airport, containing his hijacking kit, including an airline uniform and flight manuals.

Most conspiracy theorists choose to say that the bag was obviously planted. And what does “pious” have to do with anything? The question is a non sequitur.

6) Why did Mohammed Atta study flight simulation at Opa Locka, a hub of no less than six US Navy training bases?

Because he was a DBC agent!!! Of course, if the DBC were smart, they would have made sure he trained anywhere else in the utmost secrecy. But these are evidently the dumbest conspirators in history!

7) How could Mohammed Atta’s passport have been magically found buried among the Word Trade Center (WTC)’s debris when not a single flight recorder was found?

Because the DBC ludicrously planted it there!!!! Actually, wasn’t it some other hijacker’s passport rather than Atta’s (namely Satam Al Suqami?) Come on, get your facts straight!

8) Who is in the possession of the “disappeared” eight indestructible black boxes on those four flights?

The DBC! Or perhaps the claim that black boxes are indestructible only applies to normal crash conditions. The Titanic was described as “unsinkable”. We all know how that turned out!

9) Considering multiple international red alerts about a possible terrorist attack inside the US – including former secretary of state Condoleezza Rice’s infamous August 6, 2001, memo – how come four hijacked planes deviating from their computerized flight paths and disappearing from radar are allowed to fly around US airspace for more than an hour and a half – not to mention disabling all the elaborate Pentagon’s defense systems in the process?

Because the DBC were in control of the whole of American airspace and all American air controllers were in on the conspiracy and should immediately be arrested and indicted by the FBI!!

The suggestion being made here is that America should be geared up for shooting down commercial airliners full of hundreds of people within seconds of any route deviation. Just imagine that on 9/11 American fighter planes were scrambled within minutes and shot down ten planes (because many planes deviated from their prescribed routes that day), six of which didn’t have any hijackers onboard. That would have played well, wouldn’t it?

On 9/11, no one in America associated hijacking with suicide missions. Only an insane person would expect hijacked planes, or planes behaving erratically, to be routinely shot out of the sky over American cities. Even now, would anyone shoot a plane out of the sky over a city? – you would cause much more damage than letting it crash in one location. Debris would rain down all over the city causing fires, death and destruction everywhere.

10) Why the secretary of the US Air Force James Roche did not try to intercept both planes hitting the WTC (only seven minutes away from McGuire Air Force Base in New Jersey) as well as the Pentagon (only 10 minutes away from McGuire)? Roche had no less than 75 minutes to respond to the plane hitting the Pentagon.

Because he’s a member of the DBC! Or perhaps it’s because it wasn’t his job to be intercepting commercial airliners and shooting them down and you need the highest possible authorisation to start doing things like that. Or is America a military dictatorship?

11) Why did George W Bush continue to recite “My Pet Goat” in his Florida school and was not instantly absconded by the secret service?

“Abscond” – to run away secretly to avoid prosecution or punishment! Isn’t that putting the cart before the horse? Don’t you mean “extracted”?

Because he’s a member of the DBC! What better alibi?! Given that he was fully in on it, shouldn’t Bush be awarded an Oscar for looking like a gormless clown who didn’t know what the fuck was going on, and seemed utterly paralysed with indecision?

12) How could Bush have seen the first plane crashing on WTC live – as he admitted? Did he have previous knowledge – or is he psychic?

Both! He’s a pan-dimensional Reptilian shape-shifter. Also, the Florida school has a hook-up to the DBC’s live channel showing dastardly deeds!!! Apparently, the children were shocked to have been dragged into the dark secret and then forced to stay silent afterwards!

13) Bush said that he and Andrew Card initially thought the first hit on the WTC was an accident with a small plane. How is that possible when the FAA as well as NORAD already knew this was about a hijacked plane?

All over the world, it was reported that a light aircraft had crashed into the Twin Towers. A light aircraft crash was a comprehensible scenario; a hijacked commercial aircraft on a suicide mission was not.

The FAA and NORAD had no expectation that a hijacked plane would deliberately crash. No one would call it a terrorist event without a “crime scene investigation” i.e. doing things by the book.

The cretin who made up these questions wants, on the one hand, everything to be done according to standard procedure, and then on the other to be done according to unique procedures invented on the spot by people without any authority.

14) What are the odds of transponders in four different planes being turned off almost simultaneously, in the same geographical area, very close to the nation’s seat of power in Washington, and no one scrambles to contact the Pentagon or the media?

So, it has always been standard procedure in America for air traffic controllers to get onto the media to inform them about all strange happenings in airspace? Yeah, right? Should all American employees have a hotline to the media and the Pentagon, and instead of getting on with their jobs in a crisis they should have a chat with the media and the Pentagon instead?

WTF!

Imagine the conversation to the Pentagon: “Four transponders have been switched off. We have no further information so I want you to start searching the skies for these planes and then blasting commercial aircraft with hundreds of passengers onboard out of the sky.” Yeah, right!

15) Could defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld explain why initial media reports said that there were no fighter jets available at Andrews Air Force Base and then change the reports that there were, but not on high alert?

Because he was feeding false data to the media because he was a member of the DBC!!!

In London on 7/7, emergency services attending one of the bombings were accidentally sent to the wrong place because of confusion over the address. In any crisis, things go wrong and confusion reigns.

16) Why was the DC Air National Guard in Washington AWOL on 9/11?

They were all in on it! The DBC told them to do nothing. Or maybe they, like most other people, had no idea what was going on, and no orders.

17) Why did combat jet fighters of the 305th Air Wing, McGuire Air Force Base in New Jersey not intercept the second hijacked plane hitting the WTC, when they could have done it within seven minutes?

Yes, if they had known what we all know now. They didn’t know it at the time. There’s a useful phrase – the “Fog of War” – that’s used to describe the incredible confusion that often reigns during battles. Generals like to say that their battle plan is out of date the moment a battle begins. (“No plan survives contact with the enemy.” –Field-Marshal Helmuth von Moltke.)

It’s remarkable how the Conspiracy Theorists judge everything with perfect hindsight and have a touching belief in the infallibility of all government and military institutions. Did the Americans attack themselves at Pearl Harbor as part of a cunning plan to draw Japan into war? How else to explain the complete incompetence of the Americans on 7 December 1941?

18) Why did none of the combat jet fighters of the 459th Aircraft Squadron at Andrews Air Force Base intercept the plane that hit the Pentagon, only 16 kilometres away? And since we’re at it, why did the Pentagon did not release the full video of the hit?

Because someone needs to give the appropriate orders, and the Air Force commanders didn’t have the vaguest idea what was going on. There were all sorts of reports of transponders being switched off. No one knew for sure how many hijacked planes there were, and where they were.

The video? There wasn’t much to see!

19) A number of very experienced airline pilots – including US ally Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, a former fighter jet pilot – revealed that, well, only crack pilots could have performed such complex manoeuvres on the hijacked jets, while others insisted they could only have been accomplished by remote control. Is it remotely believable that the hijackers were up to the task?

The ringleader of the terrorists was an Egyptian – so the first person you would go to for impartial expertise would be the hated dictator of Egypt!

The autopilot on modern aircraft is so good that they can fly themselves. Pilots are there only for safety reasons. The job of a pilot is much less complex than you would imagine – and since when did Mubarak fly a modern airliner?!

20) How come a substantial number of witnesses did swear seeing and hearing multiple explosions in both towers of the WTC? What kind of explosions? All sorts of equipment within the WTC would have exploded due to the intense heat and fires.

As for the reliability of witnesses, try studying Psychology 101 and you’ll discover that witnesses are rarely to be trusted. Most are in shock, are in a highly suggestible state, and are hypersensitive to all manner of sensations and hallucinations.

21) How come a substantial number of reputed architects and engineers are adamant that the official narrative simply does not explain the largest structural collapse in recorded history (the Twin Towers) as well as the collapse of WTC building 7, which was not even hit by a jet?

How come a number of reputed scientists deny the reality of global warming while a much larger number ridicule the deniers?

A huge amount of debris fell on WTC 7, and it was blazing with many internal fires. You can check it out on YouTube.

22) According to Frank de Martini, WTC’s construction manager, “We designed the building to resist the impact of one or more jetliners.” The second plane nearly missed tower 1; most of the fuel burned in an explosion outside the tower. Yet this tower collapsed first, long before tower 2 that was “perforated” by the first hit. Jet fuel burned up fast – and by far did not reach the 2000-degree heat necessary to hurt the six tubular steel columns in the center of the tower – designed specifically to keep the towers from collapsing even if hit by a Boeing 707. A Boeing 707 used to carry more fuel than the Boeing 757 and Boeing 767 that actually hit the towers.

Designer of Titanic – “We have designed it to be unsinkable.” It’s touching how many non-engineers regard engineers as infallible. The Shuttle disasters? – “infallible” engineers again.

Everyone knows that the second plane hit at a lower level. Imagine that the planes had managed to strike the base levels of the Towers – the structures would have collapsed within minutes. It’s the incredible weight pressing down on any weak spot that leads to structural collapse. There was much more weight on the Tower 1 “weak zone” than the Tower 2 equivalent because the impact took place at a lower level.

From the official report: “The report concluded that the fireproofing on the Twin Towers’ steel infrastructures was blown off by the initial impact of the planes and that, if this had not occurred, the towers would likely have remained standing. This was confirmed by an independent study by Purdue University.” But they’re all in on it of course!

23) Why did Mayor Rudolph Giuliani instantly authorized the shipment of WTC rubble to China and India for recycling? Because he was on it and wanted to give the incriminating evidence to the Chinese and the Indians so that they could blackmail the conspirators!

24) Why was metallic debris found no less than 13 kilometres from the crash site of the plane that went down in Pennsylvania? Was the plane in fact shot down – under vice president Dick Cheney’s orders?

Eh?! Wasn’t Dick Cheney in on the conspiracy? So why would he order the plane to be shot down? Wouldn’t that constitute ABSOLUTE PROOF that the American government wasn’t responsible for 9/11?!

In their eagerness to stir as much shit as they can find, these dumb fuck Conspiracy Theorists have destroyed their own conspiracy theory. One second, 9/11 was an inside job. Next second, Cheney is ordering the hijacked planes to be blasted out of the sky! Talk about having your cake and eating it! On the one hand, Cheney is being accused of being part of the 9/11 conspiracy; on the other, he is being accused of a totally different conspiracy – covering up the shooting down of Flight 93! Jesus – that bastard can’t win.

The Conspiracy Theorists simply use a scattergun gun approach and hope that something sticks. They are the most intellectually dishonest people on earth. They are malicious troublemakers. “Truthers?” They are the biggest liars on earth!

25) The Pipelineistan question. What did US ambassador Wendy Chamberlain talk about over the phone on October 10, 2001, with the oil minister of Pakistan? Was it to tell him that the 1990s planned Unocal gas pipeline project, TAP (Turkmenistan/Afghanistan/ Pakistan), abandoned because of Taliban demands on transit fees, was now back in business? (Two months later, an agreement to build the pipeline was signed between the leaders of the three countries).

Yes, exactly right!! And so what? Is the suggestion seriously being made that the American government perpetrated the most heinous act of treason in history just so that a pipeline could be built that had been blocked by the Taliban? WTF!!

26) What is former Unocal lobbyist and former Bush pet Afghan Zalmay Khalilzad up to in Afghanistan?

Who cares?! Maybe he’s working on the pipeline project! Does that mean he was in on 9/11 and should be executed?!

27) How come former Pakistani foreign minister Niaz Niak said in mid-July 2001 that the US had already decided to strike against Osama bin Laden and the Taliban by October? The topic was discussed secretly at the July Group of Eight summit in Genoa, Italy, according to Pakistani diplomats.

Wouldn’t that be rather logical? He had been on their hitlist for some time. If they had moved a month earlier they might have stopped 9/11!! But, according to this scenario, Bin Laden clearly wasn’t a CIA agent, yet many Conspiracy Theorists have suggested he was.

28) How come US ambassador to Yemen Barbara Bodine told FBI agent John O’Neill in July 2001 to stop investigating al-Qaeda’s financial operations – with O’Neill instantly moved to a security job at the WTC, where he died on 9/11?

This is ridiculous. An ambassador to Yemen has no authority to give orders to FBI agents. Are we supposed to believe that the US ambassador to Yemen let it be known that she had interfered in an FBI investigation and then arranged for an agent to be assassinated as part of the 9/11 conspiracy? WTF!

29) Considering the very intimate relationship between the Taliban and Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), and the ISI and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), is Bin Laden alive, dead or still a valuable asset of the ISI, the CIA or both?

According to 27) Pakistan was aware that America wanted to kill Bin Laden. Now it’s being suggested that he was an ISI and/or CIA agent. Make your fucking mind up! This is the most ridiculous conspiracy theory in history, contradicting itself at every turn. (Note: as we now know, Bin Laden is definitively dead.)

30) Was Bin Laden admitted at the American hospital in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates on July 4, 2001, after flying from Quetta, Pakistan, and staying for treatment until July 11?

Yes, America’s “Most Wanted” often use that hospital! WTF!!!

31) Did the Bin Laden group build the caves of Tora Bora in close cooperation with the CIA during the 1980s’ anti-Soviet jihad?

So what? The CIA were actively helping the anti-Soviet jihad. Everyone knows that.

32) How come General Tommy Franks knew for sure that Bin Laden was hiding in Tora Bora in late November 2001?

Because his intelligence officers told him, perhaps? Would you prefer that Franks didn’t have a clue where he was? Franks can’t win, can he?

33) Why did President Bill Clinton abort a hit on Bin Laden in October 1999? Why did then-Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf abort a covert op in the same date? And why did Musharraf do the same thing again in August 2001?

Because their plans changed! Are we back to the allegation that Bin Laden was working for the CIA? Make your mind up!

34) Why did George W Bush dissolve the Bin Laden Task Force nine months before 9/11?

So, doesn’t the existence of the bin Laden Task Force prove that he was NOT working for the CIA? Was he suddenly recruited to the CIA by Bush months before 9/11? WTF! Does he keep changing sides every few months?!

35) How come the (fake) Bin Laden home video – in which he “confesses” to being the perpetrator of 9/11 – released by the US on December 13, 2001, was found only two weeks after it was produced (on November 9); was it really found in Jalalabad (considering Northern Alliance and US troops had not even arrived there at the time); by whom; and how come the Pentagon was forced to release a new translation after the first (botched) one?

Is it being alleged that the tape was fake, or simply that the translation wasn’t accurate? Doesn’t America have an intelligence network whose job is to find out secret information long before troops show up? Or is America totally clueless despite spending billions on its intelligence services. Which is it?

36) Why was ISI chief Lieutenant General Mahmud Ahmad abruptly “retired” on October 8, 2001, the day the US started bombing Afghanistan?

Because he was suspected of being a friend of the Taliban, perhaps?! Wouldn’t that be the logical action to take? Even now, the ISI are suspected of being riddled with Taliban sympathisers.

37) What was Ahmad up to in Washington exactly on the week of 9/11 (he arrived on September 4)? On the morning of 9/11, Ahmad was having breakfast on Capitol Hill with Bob Graham and Porter Goss, both later part of the 9/11 Commission, which simply refused to investigate two of its members. Ahmad had breakfast with Richard Armitage of the State Department on September 12 and 13 (when Pakistan negotiated its “cooperation” with the “war on terror”) and met all the CIA and Pentagon top brass. On September 13, Musharraf announced he would send Ahmad to Afghanistan to demand to the Taliban the extradition of Bin Laden.

Wasn’t it stated by this cretin in Q.27 that America and Pakistan were planning a strike on Bin Laden within weeks. So, that’s why he was there, you dumb fuck.

38) Who inside the ISI transferred US$100,000 to Mohammed Atta in the summer of 2001 – under orders of Ahmad himself, as Indian intelligence insists? Was it really ISI asset Omar Sheikh, Bin Laden’s information technology specialist who later organized the slaying of American journalist Daniel Pearl in Karachi? So was the ISI directly linked to 9/11?

Yes. The ISI were, and still are, totally infiltrated by Islamists.

39) Did the FBI investigate the two shady characters who met Mohammed Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi in Harry’s Bar at the Helmsley Hotel in New York City on September 8, 2001?

Yes.

40) What did director of Asian affairs at the State Department Christina Rocca and the Taliban ambassador to Pakistan Abdul Salam Zaeef discuss in their meeting in Islamabad in August 2001?

The weather? Why wouldn’t the director of Asian affairs talk to a Taliban ambassador? Isn’t that her job?

41) Did Washington know in advance that an “al-Qaeda” connection would kill Afghan nationalist commander Ahmad Shah Massoud, aka “The Lion of the Panjshir”, only two days before 9/11? Massoud was fighting the Taliban and al-Qaeda – helped by Russia and Iran. According to the Northern Alliance, Massoud was killed by an ISI-Taliban-al Qaeda axis. If still alive, he would never have allowed the US to rig a loya jirga (grand council) in Afghanistan and install a puppet, former CIA asset Hamid Karzai, as leader of the country.

America had been relying on Massoud to take the fight to the Taliban. His assassination was acknowledged at the time as a major blow to American interests. America would have been perfectly happy with Massoud as the leader of Afghanistan.

42) Why did it take no less than four months before the name of Ramzi Binalshibh surfaced in the 9/11 context, considering the Yemeni was a roommate of Mohammed Atta in his apartment cell in Hamburg?

All the associates of Atta were identified extremely quickly. What is the suggestion being made here? That the intelligence services are inept, or that some cover up is going on? It’s baffling trying to keep up with this alleged conspiracy.

43) Is pathetic shoe-bomber Richard Reid an ISI asset? Well, he was certainly pathetic. Are we now switching our attention to the ISI? Were they responsible for 9/11 rather than Mossad and the CIA?

44) Did then-Russian president Vladimir Putin and Russian intelligence tell the CIA in 2001 that 25 terrorist pilots had been training for suicide missions?

The most serious allegation that can be levelled against the American government is that they knew something was imminent and, in effect, allowed it to happen. We have described it as an act of omission rather than commission. It suited their foreign policy objectives to allow a major attack to take place – which is an extremely different claim from the one that they committed the act themselves.

Also, note that this point is indicating that the Russians were giving the CIA vital intelligence about a forthcoming Islamic martyrdom operation. Of course, according to the conspiracy theory, the CIA and Mossad – not Al Qaeda – were behind 9/11…so were the CIA in fact feeding false information to the Russians!

Aha!!

45) When did the head of German intelligence, August Hanning, tell the CIA that terrorists were “planning to hijack commercial aircraft?”

See 44).

If the CIA and Mossad were behind 9/11, they were evidently extremely inept at keeping their plan secret. Apparently everyone knew about it. Or were Mossad and the CIA engaged in a dastardly campaign of misinformation and disinformation?

Aha!!!

46) When did Egyptian President Mubarak tell the CIA about an attack on the US with an “airplane stuffed with explosives?”

See 44).

47) When did Israel’s Mossad director Efraim Halevy tell the CIA about a possible attack on the US by “200 terrorists?”

See 44). Hold on – weren’t Mossad involved with the CIA in the 9/11 conspiracy? Did they tell the CIA about their own joint conspiracy?

WTF!

48) Were the Taliban aware of the warning by a Bush administration official as early as February 2001 – “Either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs?”

And why wouldn’t America want to attack the Taliban given that they were hosting terrorist training camps?

49) Has Northrop-Grumman used Global Hawk technology – which allows to remotely control unmanned planes – in the war in Afghanistan since October 2001? Did it install Global Hawk in a commercial plane? Is Global Hawk available at all for commercial planes?

Aha, the remote-controlled-plane theory rears its head!!! So why did Cheney allegedly shoot down Flight 93 if it was a remote-controlled plane of the Zionist-American conspiracy? So, all the phone calls from the soon-to-be-dead passengers on the planes were faked? There were no hijackers, and it was all just made up? Suicidal fake pilots and aircrew were on the planes? Or maybe there were no passengers on the planes and all of their grieving relatives are liars and evil conspirators. Maybe all of the alleged victims are living in a witness protection scheme on a luxury desert island. WTF!

Just how low and desperate can this conspiracy theory get – it’s an obscene insult to all of the innocent victims of Islamic jihadism on 9/11.

50) Would Cheney stand up and volunteer the detailed timeline of what he was really up to during the whole day on 9/11?

He was obviously presiding over the most diabolical act of treason in human history, so he’ll probably take the Fifth! He was so evil that he even ordered Flight 93 – a plane that his conspirators had hijacked – to be shot down, and then he conspired to cover it up. He conspired against his own conspiracy!!!! WTF!!! THAT’s cunning!!!

******

It was suggested to us by our correspondent that these fifty questions were the “smoking gun”. As you can see for yourselves, they are ludicrous nonsense that no rational person could take seriously. Why do people waste so much time thinking up garbage? Have they got nothing better to do with their time?

We say this to the author of this collection of idiotic rubbish…So, on the one hand the planes were “remote controlled” or flown by “expert pilots” (obviously of a suicidal nature) and part of a conspiracy. On the other hand, they were being shot down by order of Dick Cheney, one of the alleged conspirators. Which is it? Can’t you make your fucking mind up? You haven’t spent even five seconds thinking through the logic of your position, such is your eagerness to apologise for Islamic maniacs who believe in a God who expects men and women to kill their own children if he commands it.

You have assembled a list of ridiculous points all of which have been addressed a hundred times over.

If you wish to believe that 9/11 was perpetrated by Mossad, the CIA and US Special Forces, that’s your prerogative. No rational argument will ever dissuade you otherwise. Why don’t you become a Muslim fanatic since that’s where your sympathies must lie?

It was suggested to us by the correspondent who sent this list that it was just “a fraction of the true story”. Well, God spare us from the rest of the shit if this is the calibre of material!

The correspondent wrote, “By the way, the best article I read about 9/11 accused the MOSSAD of masterminding the attack.”

Wow, we’re impressed! We prefer the shape-shifting lizard theory. Equally unbelievable but much more fun.

“Sorry for bothering you (one last time) with this subject though I find it of utmost importance for the society that is trying to liberate all humanity.”

The last people on earth who would represent the “liberation of humanity” are Muslims. They are slaves to Allah, Mohammed and the Koran and they would love to exterminate everyone who disagrees with them.

We can decode this statement as meaning that you have a dangerous 9/11 obsession, and you refuse to accept any evidence that contradicts your bizarre belief that super-rich American and Jews like to commit acts of high treason warranting the death penalty for no other reason than raking in a few extra bucks from foreign wars. You are a follower of the 9/11 religion, a new belief-system as cretinous and ridiculous as Abrahamism. You are insufficiently rational ever to escape from your mental illness. You ought to see a psychiatrist. There are plenty of legitimate reasons to despise the Zionist and American governments. Why would anyone need to invent excuses to loathe them?

In psychological terms, 9/11 is a projection of people’s anxieties about the way they are being governed onto a specific event that crystallizes their deepest fears about those ruling them. If only the conclusive proof could be found, they think, it would bring about the end of the tyrants.

But 9/11 is a just a distraction. We know the governments of the world are rotten to the core. We need to act now. We don’t need to waste our time chasing chimeras. Rather than becoming politically active and getting out and doing something, people spend all of their time digging up more and more nonsense about 9/11. It’s an excuse for non-action.

9/11 was a decade ago. Not one shred of credible evidence has ever linked the CIA or Mossad to the event despite tens of thousands of people dedicating every moment of their lives to uncovering every ludicrous detail, no matter how irrelevant, speculative or absurd, of 9/11 (as demonstrated by the fifty questions). The evidence that ties the event to Osama Bin Laden’s Al Qaeda is overwhelming. Why don’t people move on? Answer? – they can’t. They have “faith”. They have created a religion and now they don’t want to become heretics by admitting that it was Al Qaeda all along, just as the government said.
__________

6/9

One of the more thoughtful conspiracy theorists is a person who goes by the online pseudonym of JC LeSinge. He places many short movies on YouTube, discussing Nibiru, Reptilians, the Illuminati, the New World Order etc.

The debate shown below should prove illuminating to interested parties. You will observe that JC LeSinge uses a number of slippery and often ingenious arguments (in common with many CT experts). Judge for yourself whether his arguments are credible. (Note that he does not commit himself to any definite position, thus giving him scope to continually alter his case – another tactic of all sophisticated CT experts. Also, when he pleases, he is quite dismissive of certain aspects of the more outlandish conspiracy theorists – another common tactic to bolster the expert’s own credibility.)

A New Conspiracy Theory.

RECEIVING LOTS OF e-mails is a profoundly depressing experience. For every interesting message there are nine items of unbelievably irritating garbage. Here’s a message from someone calling himself “Adam Smith”.

******

Hi,

I posted at your forum as ‘Ithink’. Your websites are very interesting but I was wondering why they are hosted at Menwith Hill when you (and those you support) are anti ‘Old World Order’?

I know the rumors about the Illuminati and Menwith Hill but things are often not that simple. I would appreciate a reply. Thanks.

I see you have a yahoo account, would you like a chat through Yahoo messenger? Btw, my name isn’t Adam.

OUR REPLY: We have no idea where our websites are hosted and nor could we care less. You’ve got a serious problem if you think that “hosting location” is more important than content. You conspiracy theorists are so mad that you make up new conspiracies as you’re going along. You’re actually trying to suggest that we are working for the CIA and are providing misinformation and disinformation. Well, here’s a plan for you. Why don’t you fuck off and then you won’t have to worry about our content? This world will never change while sad fucks are trying to establish where a website is hosted. Who cares?! If you think we’re deceiving you, go somewhere else and read something else. It’s THAT simple.

Are we clear?!

******

“Adam” is a classic example of a conspiracy theorist. Sociologist David Riesman defined an “inside-dopester” as a social type whose goal was “never to be taken in by any person, cause or event.”

All conspiracy theorists are inside-dopesters. They have a pathological desire not to be fooled and that, of course, means they are the easiest people on earth to fool – as David Icke and other conspiracy theorist gurus prove every day with the deranged theories they peddle. No sane person could take the proposition of reptilian, shape-shifting Illuminati seriously, yet conspiracy theorists lap it up. They think they’ll be able to spot a reptilian a mile off! No slimy pandimensional lizard will ever be taking them by surprise!

Try to follow Adam’s thought processes. He stumbles across a website that intrigues him. So far, so good. Then he decides to start tracking the IP address and seeing if he can find out information about it. Is that NORMAL behaviour, or is a sign of incipient paranoid schizophrenia? Remember, no one asked this guy to come to our site. Who in their right mind would start trying to trace a site he has chanced upon? Only a conspiracy theorist thinks that way.

He says our site is hosted at Menwith Hill. This is a Royal Air Force station in the UK which provides communications and intelligence support services to the United Kingdom and the United States of America. According to Wikipedia: “The site contains an extensive satellite ground station and is a communications intercept and missile warning site and has been described as the largest electronic monitoring station in the world.”

So now we have a conspiracy theory – an Illuminati site apparently associated with a covert monitoring site of the Anglo-America secret services.

Now, for argument’s sake, let’s just say we were indeed working for the CIA and MI5. Would we be so fucking stupid as to provide a direct trail back to the CIA HQ in Langley, Virginia?

These conspiracy nutters actually believe that by using a few simple internet tools they can identify “black ops” groups who spend millions of dollars on internet security to ensure they can never be traced.

How stupid would you have to be to think you could have any chance at all of identifying CIA units if they didn’t want to be identified?

And this is the problem with inside-dopesters. They think their infantile IP-address look-up exercises allow them to reveal the secrets of the powers that be.

They must think that the world’s intelligence services are incredibly dumb, yet at the same time they’re always accusing the intelligence services of the most elaborate, sophisticated, impenetrable and diabolical conspiracies imaginable – like 9/11.

This is classic doublethink. If the intelligence services are good at what they do you will never know what they are doing. If they’re incompetent then who cares about them since they’re no threat and will be easily rumbled.

Conspiracy theorists simultaneously argue that the powers-that-be are fiendishly clever and yet the likes of David Icke can apparently see right through them with no trouble at all. Isn’t that a fatal contradiction? Why haven’t they bumped off this “genius” who sees so clearly what they are up to? It’s not as though he’s hard to find. He even uses his own name.

Here’s a message from the David Icke site: “In this incredible 4 hour presentation, author and truth-teller David Icke reveals how the human race got into the present global crisis and the keys to getting out. This no-holds-barred examination of the machinations underlying global events and the mechanisms of control used to keep us in fear and confusion, opens our eyes to the truth what is really happening behind the scenes of our reality. This awareness is a necessary step towards our ultimate liberation as a race, as a species, and as residents of Planet Earth – and includes a demolition of Barack Obama before he was even elected that has proved to be absolutely correct.” Well, it’s good to know that we’re all safe thanks to David Icke, a true hero of our times.

Yeah, right! We’re sick of these clowns who think they know something. They don’t know anything at all. They’re spinning pulp fiction, and the inside-dopesters think they’re learning real information when all they’re really learning is self-delusion. What’s for sure is that they’re putting lots of nice dosh and lolly in the pockets of their “gurus” such as Icke, Makow and Jones.

The truth is they’re out of the loop and they will always be out of the loop. Their worst nightmare has come true. They have no inside dope and they are clueless about what’s really going on.

To all those people who are obsessed with looking up IP addresses rather than trying to campaign against the Old World Order, don’t come near us. Think whatever you like about us. In fact, when you think of us, just picture huge, pan-dimensional, shape-shifting lizards that can become invisible at will and you’ll be pretty close to the mark, OK?!

NOW FUCK OFF. WE’RE TOTALLY SICK OF MESSAGES FROM LUNATICS.

We are simply staggered by the amount of mental illness there is in the world if 90% of the people who write to us are anything to judge by. It’s profoundly depressing reading the thoughts of scores of mad people every day.

******

To anyone who’s actually interested in the truth, our website uses a cheap and nasty website production tool called “Mr Site”, and the site is hosted on their servers. We have no control over where they host their servers and nor are we interested in the subject – because we would be deranged inside-dopesters if we actually cared about such things.

The website software in our experience is, frankly, crap: unreliable, unstable, inconsistent when viewed from different browsers and bug-ridden. However, it has the advantage that it’s (mostly) easy to use and the content can be altered at any time by any of the three of us who operate the site. Its ease of use marginally outweighs its many problems.

We are a communication cell of the Illuminati. We’re not website designers. The Illuminati isn’t going to employ an enormous team of coders to create a glossy, whizzy website that reflects all of the shiny, corporate, capitalist values of the likes of Coca Cola. We are ANTICORPORATE, for Christ’s sake!!!

We have deliberately chosen a rough and ready, primitive look so that everyone can see how easy it is to get an enormous project off the ground for no more than a few dollars. No one can stop you. You don’t need corporate funding. Anyone can get anything off the ground extremely easily these days.

With any luck, the vast wealth of the corporates will become irrelevant and they will be swept away by inexpensive start-ups.

Our website is a reflection of our philosophy that the OWO’s gatekeepers are becoming increasingly irrelevant. Anyone or any group with ideas, creativity and something to say doesn’t need to go to banks and beg for money. You don’t need to hire expensive programmers, designers, advertisers, lawyers, managers, executives and public relations experts.

It sickens us that inside-dopesters would rather waste their time on utterly futile exercises of trying to trace our IP address rather than doing something constructive we their lives.

What have the inside-dopesters “proved” – that our site is hosted by “Mr Site” and we use their cheap software for non web-developers. Big Deal! It was never a mystery in the first place. So, does that mean we’re frauds, or that we’re working for the CIA or MI5? Have the inside-dopesters caught us bang to rights, just as they caught the Reptilians and the 9/11 inside-job team?

God save us from conspiracy theorists! They’re just the latest version of Abrahamists, prepared to believe in anything if it makes them feel good.
__________

Treachery:

AN ADMINISTRATOR OF THE MOVEMENT – “Sophia” – openly attacked the position of the Illuminati: “Agree with you. The stance A/C takes is not only naive and contrary to the whole point of scientific enquiry, the establishment of hard facts, it is also detrimental to ‘M’ by putting off many people. Only a fool believes the official conspiracy theory about the central event that has enabled TPTB to rain down a barrage of disgusting legislations upon us, start new wars that since have killed hundred thousand innocent civilians. Only a fool would talk all day about OWO tyranny and then reject the mountain of evidence, that could, if brought to light bring down the very people that are central in this ‘game’. But hey, why would we care, it’s not like they murdered and continue to murder people right?” –Sophia

Two members of this Illuminati cell are PhD scientists. (55% of the Illuminati are educated to PhD level, and two thirds of those are PhD scientists.) Speaking from that perspective, we find it astounding that closed-minded bigots can possibly imagine that their amateur-hour, non-science speculations constitute anything that resembles “scientific enquiry”. Conspiracy theorists don’t know anything about science.

That’s the whole problem. They think that wild, unsupported conjecture is “fact”. They have zero understanding of the scientific method. The only reason we are in a position to criticize science is that so many of us are from highly qualified scientific backgrounds.

We have contempt for the kind of scientifically illiterate people who watch YouTube propaganda videos and think they are “fact”. Every single point raised by the conspiracy theorists concerning 9/11 has been explicitly refuted or discredited. The “mountain of evidence” points in a single direction – that Muslim maniacs were responsible for 9/11 using hijacked planes with huge fuel loads that were slammed into buildings in such a way as to fatally damage the structural integrity. The only mystery about 9/11 is why so many non-scientists and non-engineers imagine that their uninformed opinions make them experts on subjects they have never studied and know nothing about.

If you’re clueless about relativity theory, quantum mechanics and M-theory, what makes you imagine you have one meaningful thing to say about the science of 9/11? Where are your qualifications? Where’s your MERIT?

The whole point of meritocracy is to place those who know what they’re talking about in positions of power. The whole point of nonmeritocracy is to make every clown imagine they have a valid opinion that ought to be respected. WRONG.

9/11 conspiracy theories represent amateurs thinking they know more than professionals, and it’s for exactly the same reason that the world has to endure Abrahamism. Billions of morons think that ancient books are superior to science, that “belief” beats facts.

Conspiracy theorists are believers too, and they convince themselves that anti-scientific junk is “proof”. They trot out a few controversialists from the scientific community to support their claims and they imagine that a maverick’s opinion counts for more than scientific consensus – because all the rest are somehow “in on it”.

While it’s certainly true that the scientific establishment can be wrong, there is not one scintilla of evidence to indicate that it got anything wrong regarding 9/11.

Why is that a decade after the most studied event in history, only conspiracy theorists think Muslims weren’t responsible for 9/11?

Don’t they realise they’ve become part of a religion that refuses to listen to the mountain of evidence proving them wrong? They’re like the Muslims who believe the Earth is flat because the Koran says so.

Being in a “dialogue” with a conspiracy theorist is as futile as trying to get any sense from a Muslim.

Facts are not at issue – they point to exactly where the blame rightly lies – only belief.

******

In a thread on 9/11, “Phantom” said: “My view practically corresponds with the A/C site as I already had a similar opinion before ever finding A/C. I tend to see it from the Law of Necessity; where is the relevance to it in my life? To me, it has no relevance to debate idiotic things and detracts from my time to be spreading the 9/11 “truth” when I could be doing better things with my life and opinions.

1 pop video is approximately 3 minutes long. 300 million people watching it amounts to 900 million minutes altogether, which is 15 million accumulated hours. It takes 10,000 hours of practice to fully master some skill, and it takes about 60 minutes of intelligent social interaction between 2 or more people to birth a new perspective. “The more knowledge that you have, the more points of contact you have with the divine mind.” –Phantom

******

That’s exactly the type of approach we want to endorse. Why are 9/11 conspiracy theorists wasting so much time on this subject? There’s no mileage in it at all. Everyone knows who carried out 9/11 – 19 Muslims in a martyrdom operation organised by Osama Bin Laden to strike back at the Great Satan America for supporting Zionist Israel and for having infidel army bases in Arab nations. What’s hard to understand? Anyone who rejects the facts is essentially claiming that there is no such phenomenon as Islamic Jihad. Why don’t they try doing some research on the subject? Then they will discover that thousands of Islamic terrorist operations have been carried out all over the world, killing tens of thousands of innocent people. 9/11 was the pinnacle of that campaign. It was a low-tech operation that took America by surprise.

Don’t forget that in 1941 America was practically on a war-footing with Imperial Japan and still managed to be taken totally by surprise at Pearl Harbor. The Japanese used the code TORA, TORA, TORA to signal that they had achieved total surprise. The 9/11 hijackers could just as well have said the same thing. Conspiracy theorists refuse to believe that America is capable of being surprised. Their belief in the infallibility of the authorities is something of a conundrum. If the authorities are so good, their alleged 9/11 inside job would have been flawless, leaving no smoke for the conspiracy theories to interpret as a fire. It’s always the same with the inside-dopesters. They think that everyone is fooled except them, and that makes them the biggest fools of all.

Using Phantom’s calculations, it’s easily possible that more than a TRILLION HOURS of analysis have been devoted to 9/11. Result? – the official version is undented. Look at Watergate. A couple of journalists brought down a President over a fairly trivial event. If an army of millions of conspiracy theorists can’t land a single serious punch on the official version of 9/11 it’s because there’s no target there.

Given what happened with Watergate when the most powerful man in the world was forced to resign over a cover-up, why would people in the White House in 2001 expect to get away with the most heinous act of treason of all time? Just one loose thread would cause the whole alleged conspiracy to unravel. Would YOU take that risk? If you would, you’d be insane. Why would ultra rich people having a great lifestyle risk their lives to engineer a pretext for war against Iraq by slaughtering their own citizens?

The official reason for the war against Iraq was to remove WMD – weapons of mass destruction. Yet no WMD were found. Would the 9/11 conspiracy theorists like to explain why the alleged 9/11 conspirators were so inept that they couldn’t even manage to plant a few WMD? The credibility and reputation of Bush and Blair were destroyed by the failure to find WMD in Iraq. How could such people have pulled off 9/11 if they couldn’t even rustle up a few planted biological and nuclear weapons to justify their war?

******

The Old World Order are guilty of endless crimes against the people. No one needs to label them with crimes they didn’t commit when there are so many they DID commit. They have destroyed countless lives with their greed and selfishness. They have destroyed the potential of billions of people.

They only understand one language: power. Their power comes from money. If you want to destroy their power, you must follow the money and take it away from them, and stop them passing it on to their families.

100% inheritance tax is the only way to stop the OWO, yet most of the 9/11 conspiracy theorists would stand utterly opposed to such a tax. That’s the real tragedy, and shows how effectively the OWO have brainwashed the masses.

******

The Movement, if it’s to be worthwhile, must attract people such as Pho’ and Phantom, and repel the sort of people who are full of bile and have nothing to contribute other than dredging up disproved conspiracy theories.

To beat the Old World Order, we need to assemble a group of people who are smarter, more creative, more dynamic, more disciplined and tougher.

People from unprivileged backgrounds who achieve PhDs are MUCH smarter than privileged preppies piling out of Harvard Business School with MBAs and golden tickets to million dollar salaries.

Look at where the “wonder workers” of Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Columbia and Goldman Sachs have led the world – to the brink of economic meltdown. These “geniuses” have failed in every regard.

Why? Because their purpose wasn’t to create a healthy, stable economy, but to enrich themselves. All economic systems collapse for one reason only: the greed of those running the economy. If you want a rational, predictable economy you have to make it impossible for the greed gang to drive the economy over the cliff in search of higher returns for themselves.

We said the MBA geniuses got it wrong. Of course, that only means in relation to the rest of us. In terms of themselves, they got exactly what they set out to accomplish – enormous personal wealth. They aren’t the ones suffering while the economy goes into a death spiral.

******

The Illuminati is a secret society for smart people. We’ll be blunt. We don’t like stupid people. We don’t want to be in their company. We don’t want to listen to their bizarre, uninformed theories. We don’t want to be around people contaminated with superstition, faith and irrationality. We don’t want to hear dumb conspiracy theories.

If we could get on a spaceship and leave the idiots and dunces behind, we would. We would love to colonize a New Earth in space and let the Abrahamists and conspiracy theorists ooze back into the primordial slime whence they came. We, on the other hand, will get on with the project to form the Community of Gods, the Society of the Divine. You can be sure no stupid people will be playing any role in its creation.

Unlike David Icke, we’re not running a business. We don’t need to court popularity and seek as many new recruits as possible so that we can flog our merchandise to them.

We don’t care about alienating people, or making enemies. If we come across as arrogant, so what? Many of us have climbed out of the gutter and achieved astonishing things in our respective fields of expertise. We overcame the odds. We had no silver spoons in our mouths. We had no networks of influential friends and family. We had no privileged education, no access to private tutors and the best schools and teachers.

We clawed our way up from nothing against overwhelming odds. We are determined people, highly confident in our own abilities. We trust each other implicitly. We don’t suffer fools gladly and we’re not trying to win any popularity contests. All we care about are truth, freedom, and maximising our human potential. We hate those who block our path. We hate everyone who doesn’t “get it”.

The Old World Order will be undone by the contradictions inherent in how they run the world. The gap between rich and poor keeps getting wider. Resentment towards the rich is growing at an enormous rate. One day soon, the whole Fools’ paradise of the rich will collapse. The people will take back what the rich stole from them. New leaders will be required for the New Age. Will you be one of them?

******

Did you know that the Norwegian Christian Fundamentalist mass murderer had a vision of society that was even worse than that of the Muslims he hated so much? It’s surprising that he wasn’t a Muslim himself given that his views were so backward. He spelt out his “utopia” (Hell to everyone else) in his 1,500 page manifesto. He was certainly right that Islam must be stopped and certainly wrong that fascist Christian Fundamentalism was the “solution”. He quoted philosopher John Stuart Mill: “One person with a belief is equal to the force of 100,000 who have only interests.” We would express it rather differently: “One person who knows what he’s doing is equal to the force of a million who don’t.”

The Old World Order have triumphed over the world using a set of extremely primitive but astoundingly powerful tools. Their implementation of their techniques has become increasingly sophisticated, but at root they’re just variations of Pavlovian conditioning. The game is simple – to get the simple masses to absorb and internalise the values of the ruling elite.

The Illuminati reject everything the OWO stand for. We reject their wealth, their nepotism, their cronyism, their “family first” policy, their system of privilege, their use of money to buy advantages denied to others. We reject their morality, their Abrahamist religions of control, their claims to “divine right” to rule. We reject their freedumb and dumbocracy.

Our task is to strip bare the immoral basis of the ruling elite’s morality. Nietzsche wrote an astonishing book called The Genealogy of Morals where he analysed the evolutionary development of morals from earlier forms. Once morality is seen as something that evolves then its claims to absolute and eternal validity are overthrown.

Perhaps there was a time when it was right and sensible to keep the stupid masses under control by terrifying them out of their wits with what would happen if they disobeyed “God” while promising them the highest reward possible – Paradise – if they obeyed.

That time is over. Now is the time to attack stupidity and educate the people.

Elite groups can wield control only over submissive, stupid, fearful sheeple. To bring elites to an end, it is necessary to revalue all values, reprogram the people, remove the brainwashing to which they’ve been subjected and to implement systems that produce smart, free, capable, talented, ambitious, independent, autonomous individuals who can see right through any attempts to condition and manipulate them. This new version of humanity would never permit the rise of any privileged elite.

The idea of an elite is inextricably linked with that of God. All that any elite has to do is convince the superstitious masses that God appointed them and that to disobey them is to disobey God himself. The sheeple therefore think that the elite are the legitimate authority, the rightful rulers.

Imagine a Papal election where the College of Cardinals didn’t decide who would be Pope, but rather every Catholic in the world was given a vote. Can there be any doubt that “One Catholic One Vote” would result in the end of Catholicism within a single generation? All the mystique would dissolve. The “magic” would vanish. The Wizard of Oz would be totally exposed.

The last thing that any system of authority wants is the involvement of the masses. Imagine an American election where there were no official political parties and anyone could stand. Imagine Congress being full of ordinary men and women from all backgrounds who had managed to win the support of their peers.

Would Congress be recognisable? Absolutely anyone could be President rather than someone funded by Wall Street and in the pocket of lobbyists.

Wouldn’t that be REAL democracy? But of course that’s what the people must never have. They must always be given the illusion, never the reality.

Only suckers and sheeple play along. Forget 9/11. Campaign for a new political system that makes the Democrats and Republicans ILLEGAL. They’re as bad as each other. Let’s have hundreds of independent political parties. Let’s make it possible for an unrecognised genius without two cents to rub together to become President.

The world is ruled by fantasy, delusion, superstition, irrationality, faith, prejudice and privilege. Isn’t it time we started running it rationally, scientifically and fairly?
__________

9/11:

“America has been hit by Allah at its most vulnerable point, destroying, thank God, its most prestigious building.” –Osama bin Laden, 7 October 2001

Rather an odd thing for a Muslim to say if 9/11 was a Mossad/CIA operation.

15 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudi Arabians espousing Wahhabism, the most virulent form of Islam that calls for Islamic domination of the world and the global imposition of Sharia Law, for absolute intolerance of heresy and apostasy, for the wholesale destruction of Israel, for women to be totally subordinate to men, for Islamic theocracy to replace democracy.

Mohammed Atta, the Egyptian psychopath who led the hijackers, stipulated in his will: “The person who will wash my body near my genitals must wear gloves on his hands so he won’t touch my genitals…I don’t want any women to go to my grave at all during my funeral or on any occasion thereafter.”

The Wahhabites particularly despised New York, with its Zionist powerbase in Wall Street, its large Jewish population, its sexually liberated women, its fondness for drink, drugs and partying. It was a perfect target.

The hijackers wanted to drive out the American infidels located in several military bases in Saudi Arabia. These infidels were defiling the sacred homeland of Islam, the holy ground where Mohammed himself once walked. They wanted to attack America for its constant support for Zionist Israel, regardless of the number of atrocities carried out by the Zionists against the Muslim Palestinians. They wanted to call, in the most dramatic fashion, for an Islamic Caliphate uniting all the Islamic nations. And they wanted to end the sanctions that had been imposed on Iraq for many years, leading to a humanitarian disaster that was harming children in particular.

Why don’t the “Truthers” think the Wahhabites were supremely motivated to strike against the Great Satan? It’s because they are absolutely ignorant of Wahhabism and have made no attempt at all to study it. Know thy enemy! The Truthers haven’t the vaguest idea who the enemy is.

Here’s the “logic” of the Truthers. The elite want to impose drastic controls on the people (true). A major terrorist incident would give them the pretext (true). Therefore, they conclude, the elite engineered the terrorist incident themselves. They seem entirely oblivious to the fact that many people all across the world hate America and wish it serious harm. They think, perversely, that only Americans are motivated to attack America (!). They also think that no one other than the CIA, Mossad and U.S. Special Forces are capable of pulling off a terrorist incident. They think that 9/11 was some extremely sophisticated operation that a bunch of “rag heads” could never have accomplished.

In fact, 9/11 was about as crude as you could get. Nineteen Muslims used box cutters and fake bombs to hijack four planes and terrify their passengers (none of whom would have expected to die since hijackings had never before resulted in suicide operations) and then crashed them into buildings not long after take-off. There’s nothing difficult to grasp. The only thing cruder would have been something along the lines of the previous Islamic terrorist attack on the Twin Towers in 1993 – when they drove a truck bomb packed with explosives into the public parking garage beneath the World Trade Centre. Their intention was that the North Tower’s foundations would be so weakened by the massive explosion that the tower would topple over and hit the South Tower, bringing both towers down and killing thousands. “If at first you don’t succeed, try and try again!”

Why can’t people accept the blindingly obvious facts? Was 1993 a dry run by Mossad and the CIA? Surely the Truthers must offer a full explanation of 1993 as an inside job if we are to conclude that 9/11 was an inside job too. After all, it would be extremely bizarre to conclude that 1993 was carried out by Muslim maniacs but 9/11 wasn’t. If the Muslims did it once, they could certainly do it again, and do it better with a more effective plan.

Sharia Law – which advocates the stoning of adulterers, amputations of limbs for theft, the death penalty for homosexuality and apostasy – is supported by around 80% of Muslims. These people should not be regarded as gentle, compassionate, forgiving people. They are intolerant savages and anyone who has ever read the Koran knows that only the Torah exceeds it in terms of brutality and terror. Why would anyone think these people couldn’t be responsible for 9/11?

Most Muslims want Islam to be a central guiding principle of their society i.e. for Islam to be very much in the public sphere. They believe that democracy and Islam are entirely compatible, yet it’s impossible to believe that non-Muslim minorities would be properly protected in explicitly Islamic States. There’s no sign of genuine modernisation or enlightenment in any Islamic country, and failing to separate the State and religion in extremist countries can never lead to democracy – only to theocracy (like Iran).
__________

7/9