Dacia Iluministă

Swiss-born Rousseau was not formally a member of the Illuminati, but he moved in Illuminati circles and was highly regarded by the Illuminati. Like several other prominent individuals in whom the Illuminati have taken an interest over the centuries, he was regarded as too much of a maverick to accept the discipline of the Illuminati. Hence, he became a collaborator rather than a member.

Rousseau’s masterpiece The Social Contract (1762) was immediately recognised in Europe as a revolutionary work. Copies of the book were burned in Geneva and later in several European capitals. The author and his work were denounced in Paris and condemned by the French parliament. Rousseau, already exiled from his home city of Geneva, had to flee France where he had been living.

The Social Contract is, in effect, a statement of the political position of the Illuminati at that time, and remains largely valid to this day. A Meritocratic Republic of Laws, based on a social contract operating in the interests of all, is the vision of the Illuminati. This is the New World Order. It does harm to none, except those who do not wish to promote the common good. A chain is only as strong as its weakest link. The chain of our society could not be any weaker because of the number of people who are left to rot by the Old World Order. Society can never be healthy and strong until as much effort is put into strengthening the weakest link as is put into polishing the strongest links.

The Old World Order, in their high towers of greed, selfishness and privilege, are the antithesis of good citizens. They can play no part in any healthy State. Everything that characterises the Old World Order would become illegal in the New World Order.

“Let us establish just laws for our contract.” –Virgil

******

The Social Contract.

The Social Contract was the “Bible” of the two leading Illuminists and Jacobins: Robespierre and Saint-Just. They attempted to put Rousseau’s ideas into practice, but they were given no time and space. In the aftermath of the Revolution, France was plunged into war against the great royalist powers of Europe: the Holy Roman Empire, Prussia, Spain, Portugal and Great Britain. Counter-revolutionary forces were everywhere. There were uprisings inside France against the Revolutionary government. The Catholic Church was opposed to the Revolution. France was in chaos.

In other circumstances, the Jacobins might have created the radical new society they desired. Instead, they were locked into conflict, horror and terror and failed to bring their vision to fruition. That is the world’s great tragedy. Now, more than ever, we need a social contract between the governors and the governed, one that prevents the governors from doing what they always do: governing in their own interests rather than those of the people and then lying through their teeth that they are doing their best for everyone. Democracy is dumbocracy. You’d need to be supremely dumb to buy it.

******

Quotations by Jean-Jacques Rousseau.

“The first man who, having enclosed a piece of ground, bethought himself of saying, ‘This is mine’, and found people simple enough to believe him, was the real founder of civil society. From how many crimes, wars and murders, from how many horrors and misfortunes might not any one have saved mankind, by pulling up the stakes, or filling up the ditch, and crying to his fellows: ‘Beware of listening to this impostor; you are undone if you once forget that the fruits of the earth belong to us all, and the earth itself to nobody.’”

When it comes to any piece of land on earth, what allows anyone to say, “I own this. It’s mine.” What if someone else says, “No, it’s mine”, or, “It belongs to no one.” Who’s right? The question, in the past, was settled by force. Nowadays, it’s by wealth and legal contracts, underpinned, ultimately, by force once more. So nothing has changed. Brute force is concealed under a veneer of legalistic respectability, but still might is right, still the strong take what they want from the weak. The lesson is simple: you get what you want in this world through force. That is the eternal credo of the Old World Order.

Nowadays, no conclusion is possible other than that the economy is for the good of the rich and powerful alone. That’s why the banks – the main driver of the wealth of the Old World Order – are not under the control of the nation. How can the economy be left in the hands of entities that have radically different priorities from the nation itself? Banks and their shareholders want to maximise their profits. They care nothing for economic stability and for helping the underprivileged of society. In the pursuit of profit, banks would not hesitate to undermine the nation’s economy. That is exactly what the latest financial crisis was about, yet no one has demanded that banks, in the national interest, be brought under the control of the elected government.

Some banks are “too big to fail”, we are told. In other words, banks have been permitted to acquire so much wealth and power that it would destroy the economy if they went out of business. In effect, these banks are holding a gun to the head of the nation. Why were they allowed to get so big? Cui bono? Certainly not the people. Taxpayers had to bail out these banking leviathans, but you can be certain they will not be there when the vast bonuses are being paid out to the fat cats. How strange is that? Why do people tolerate it? How stupid are they? They have been brainwashed to think that strong government is tantamount to communism. Many Americans have a great fear of federal government, and that leads to an even greater fear of a New World Order. So, they would rather be the suckers who get ripped off by the Wall Street robber gang and carpetbaggers. It’s time they studied economic theory and wised up about the nature of free market capitalism – the deadly instrument of tyranny of the Old World Order.

“Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains.” This is Rousseau’s most famous quotation. In our society, you are free, for the most part, in direct proportion to how wealthy you are. The poor are barely distinguishable from slaves.

“It is then, according to Grotius, doubtful whether the human race belongs to a hundred men, or those hundred men to the human race … On this showing, the human species is divided into so many herds of cattle, each with its ruler, who keeps guard over them for the purpose of devouring them.”

This is an excellent definition of the Old World Order.

“Thus, Philo tells us, the Emperor Caligula reasoned, concluding equally well either that kings were gods, or that men were beasts. The reasoning of Caligula agrees with that of Hobbes and Grotius. Aristotle, before any of them, had said that men are by no means equal naturally, but that some are born for slavery, and others for dominion.”

This is the core ideology of the OWO. We are born, they think, to be their slaves.

“Aristotle was right; but he took the effect for the cause. Nothing can be more certain than that every man born in slavery is born for slavery. Slaves lose everything in their chains, even the desire of escaping from them: they love their servitude … Force made the first slaves, and their cowardice perpetuated the condition.”

Most people in our society secretly love servitude. Why else would they so willingly endure the reign of the OWO? Why else would they tolerate Wall Street fat cats?

“Tranquillity is found also in dungeons; but is that enough to make them desirable places to live in? The Greeks imprisoned in the cave of the Cyclops lived there very tranquilly, while they were waiting their turn to be devoured.”

Are we not living in dungeons – our square boxes that we call houses – waiting our turn to be devoured by our masters?

“Even if each man could alienate himself, he could not alienate his children: they are born men and free; their liberty belongs to them, and no one but they has the right to dispose of it.”

Yet all of the time, we inflict on our children our own cowardice. If we start off as slaves of the Old World Order, our children inherit our enslavement, but we have no right to impose our sentence on them. Children should never be allowed to inherit either a lofty or lowly position in life. Their merits should dictate where they end up, not their family connections.

“When Nunez Balbao, standing on the seashore, took possession of the South Seas and the whole of South America in the name of the crown of Castile, was that enough to dispossess all their actual inhabitants, and to shut out from them all the princes of the world? If this was the case, it was quite unnecessary to multiply these ceremonies, and all the King of Spain had to do was, from his apartment, to take possession all at once of the whole universe, allowing himself to exclude from his empire what had formerly been possessed by other princes.”

This sums up the Old World Order. They think they can take ownership of things to which they have no right at all.

“Under bad governments, equality is only apparent and illusory; it serves only to keep the pauper in his poverty and the rich man in the position he has usurped. In fact, laws are always of use to those who possess and harmful to those who have nothing: from which it follows that the social state is advantageous to men only when all have something and none too much.”

This is a key statement. The New World Order will ensure that all have something and none too much. The members of the Old World Order desire that many will have next to nothing, some will have something and a few – they themselves – will have virtually everything.

“Christianity preaches only servitude and dependence. Its spirit is so favourable to tyranny that it always profits by such a regime. True Christians are made to be slaves, and they know it and do not much mind: this short life counts for too little in their eyes.”

This is an excellent summary not just of Christianity, but also of Judaism and Islam: the three slave religions created by the Old World Order to exploit the weak and gullible.

“The people of England regards itself as free; but it is grossly mistaken; it is free only during the election of members of parliament. As soon as they are elected, slavery overtakes it, and it is nothing. The use it makes of the short moments of liberty it enjoys shows indeed that it deserves to lose them.”

Nothing has changed in Britain since 1762. British “democracy” is still one of the greatest jokes on earth. America now has equally ridiculous elections.

“In a word, it is the best and most natural arrangement that the wisest should govern the many, when it is assured that they will govern for its profit, and not for their own.”

This is a perfect statement of meritocracy and the New World Order. The Old World Order, on the other hand, govern purely for their own profit.

“In respect of riches, no citizen shall ever be wealthy enough to buy another, and none poor enough to be forced to sell himself; which implies, on the part of the great, moderation in goods and position.”

The Old World Order are never moderate in their greed. Look at the whole culture of vast bonuses for bankers. Do these people care a damn about anyone else?

“Wise men, if they try to speak their language to the common herd instead of its own, cannot possibly make themselves understood.”

Most people have been so debased by democracy, by the dumbed-down ideology of capitalism that they can barely think for themselves. They have a short attention span and no ability to follow complex arguments. They want everything delivered to them in sound bites. Intellectual debate has become impossible in our society. That’s why a clown like George W Bush could become President in the American dumbocracy.

“Each of us puts his person and all of his power in common under the supreme direction of the general will, and, in our corporate capacity, we receive each member as an indivisible part of the whole. At once, in place of the individual personality of each contracting party, this act of association creates a corporate and collective body, composed of as many members as the assembly contains voters, and receiving from this act its unity, its common identity, its life and its will. This public person, so formed by the union of all other persons, formerly took the name of city, and now takes that of Republic or body politic; it is called by its members State when passive, Sovereign when active, and Power when compared with others like itself. Those who associated in it take collectively the name of people, and severally are called citizens, as sharing in the sovereign authority… “Again, the Sovereign, being formed wholly of the individuals who compose it, neither has nor can have any interest contrary to theirs; and consequently the sovereign power need give no guarantee to its subjects, because it is impossible for the body to wish to hurt all of its members.”

The sort of State we have now can barely be called a State at all. The people are not bound together by a social contract that clearly defines what is expected of each and every citizen. Instead, we merely have a collection of people – families and individuals – who have not signed up to any social contract and operate in their own interests rather than that of the collective. Negative liberty and free markets are the order of the day. No one cares about the existence of a huge underclass. This underclass is inconceivable in the State characterised by Rousseau (and the Illuminati).

Rousseau’s position is that when everyone agrees to the social contract they become, in effect, cells in a new, vibrant, living and breathing entity called the State. The State, so to speak, is alive. It is a person with a mind. It acts in its own interest. In the same way that none of us, assuming we are happy and healthy, would ever deliberately cause harm to any part of ourselves because we would only be damaging ourselves, so Rousseau’s State is incapable of harming any part of itself i.e. it will never do any damage to any of its cells – its citizens.

Whereas Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan had everyone submitting to the power of the monarch (the Old World Order’s familiar master and slave paradigm), Rousseau has everyone submitting to themselves (no masters and no slaves). That is, all cells/citizens are alike – none takes precedence over another – so to submit to the State is to submit to yourself, but with yourself multiplied as many times as there are citizens in the State.

In such a State, no citizen would ever be abandoned (as so many are in our shameful society), since the State is damaged if any of its cells is damaged. In other words, Rousseau’s State inherently seeks the benefit of all. It would never favour one group over another, never permit some to enjoy great privilege, wealth and power while others are reduced to desperation, poverty and powerlessness. The Old World Order’s version of the State is anathema to Rousseau.

If the State does not explicitly help to maximise the potential of every citizen then it is no State at all. It is a tyrant that must be overthrown. Its rule is illegal and no one need comply with it. That is the State in which we currently exist. It is an illegal tyranny of the Old World Order, designed to keep the vast majority of us in degrading servitude to the elite, dynastic bloodlines that have trampled over us for millennia.

“It is solely on the basis of the common interest that every society should be governed.”

Our contemporary society is governed on the basis of providing maximum service to privileged elites. There is no common interest.

“To be general, a will need not always be unanimous; but every vote must be counted: any formal exclusion is a breach of generality.”

Consider the US election of 2000: the Supreme Court ignored the will of the American people.

******

The General Will.

“The body politic, therefore, is also a moral being, possessed of a will; and this general will, which tends always to the preservation and welfare of the whole and of every part, and is the source of the laws, constitutes for all the members of the State, in their relations to one another and to it, the rule of what is just or unjust.”

“It follows from what has gone before that the general will is always upright and always tends to the public advantage; but it does not follow that the deliberations of the people always have the same rectitude. Our will is always for our own good, but we do not always see what it is; the people is never corrupted, but it is often deceived, and on such occasions only does it seem to will what is bad.

“There is often a great deal of difference between the will of all and the general will; the latter considers only the common interest, while the former takes private interest into account, and is no more than a sum of particular wills: but take away from these same wills the pluses and minuses that cancel one another, and the general will remains as the sum of the differences.

“(‘Every interest,’ says the Marquis d’Argenson, ‘has different principles. The agreement of two particular interests is formed by opposition to a third.’ He might have added that the agreement of all interests is formed by opposition to that of each. If there were no different interests, the common interest would be barely felt, as it would encounter no obstacle; all would go on of its own accord, and politics would cease to be an art.)

“If, when the people, being furnished with adequate information, held its deliberations, the citizens had no communication one with another, the grand total of the small differences would always give the general will, and the decision would always be good. But when intrigues arise, and partial associations are formed at the expense of the great association, the will of each of these associations becomes general in relation to its members, while it remains particular in relation to the State: it may then be said that there are no longer as many votes as there are men, but only as many as there are associations. The differences become less numerous and give a less general result. Lastly, when one of these associations is so great as to prevail over all the rest, the result is no longer a sum of small differences, but a single difference; in this case there is no longer a general will, and the opinion which prevails is purely particular.

“It is therefore essential, if the general will is to be able to make itself known, that there should be no partial society in the state and that each citizen should express only his own opinion. But if there are partial societies, it is best to have as many as possible and to prevent them from being unequal. These precautions are the only ones that can guarantee that the general will shall always be enlightened, and that the people shall in no way deceive itself.”

Rousseau makes an astonishing point that is never discussed in the modern world. All political parties are “partial associations”. They express a particular rather than a general will. When a Republican President is elected in America do you imagine for one moment that he operates in the interest of all Americans? You would have to be insane to believe that. A Republican President has to repay all of the people who put him there, he has to govern according to the Republican platform on which he stood, he has to satisfy his Republican constituency, he has to spread the Republican message, he has to put Republicans in as many influential positions as possible. In other words, a Republican President governs on behalf of the Republican Party i.e. a particular will. A Democratic President would do exactly the same for his Democratic constituency.

Democracy never expresses the general will. It doesn’t even come close. It is always about satisfying particular, narrow agendas of self interest of the victorious political party. It is astounding that such an ideology has managed to pass itself off as a vehicle of “government of the people, by the people, for the people.” It is nothing of the kind. It is government of the people, by sectional interests for sectional interests.

In order to come close to “government for the people” it is necessary to abolish sectional interests i.e. political parties. The government of a nation should be placed in the hands of meritocratic independents with no party allegiances and no political axe to grind. Each independent should be elected by a constituency of people in that person’s profession, who can vouch for his expertise, and who can remove him if he no longer commands their respect. The independents should then decide amongst themselves whom the President or Prime Minister should be. The idea of having a popularity contest between two individuals put forward by self-interested political parties is no basis for good governance of a nation. It leads to exactly the type of ineffectual government we have to endure now – the form of government that suits the Old World Order down to the ground since their power is never threatened.

The general will is directed solely to the common interest. It never serves one part of society at the expense of another. Under the operation of the general will, no one would feel alienated from the State. However, it is unclear how in practical terms the general will could ever be reliably and unambiguously expressed. Rousseau envisaged a highly educated, independently-minded citizen body, with none too rich or too poor, coming together in the absence of sectional interests for free and vigorous discussion. They would vote directly for the policies to be implemented by the executive. In the age of the internet, this has become a practical possibility, but far too many people are too poorly educated and there are too many groups with sectional interests that would sabotage any progress.

The Illuminati advocate the extension of humanity’s most successful, objective and fairest tool – the scientific method – to the political arena to find the optimal way to express the general will. The scientific method involves putting forward hypotheses, testing them, refining them, testing them again in an iterative process that never truly ends, until a hypothesis is promoted to the status of theory (“law” might be a better term to show that theories have reached a condition where they are almost immune to being overturned).

Why shouldn’t the same thing be done in political terms? The aim of government is to find the best way to express the general will. So, why not implement hypotheses and test the impact they have on society? If they are unsuccessful, reject them; if they are reasonably successful, refine them to improve them, if they are wildly successful, enshrine then in the nation’s Constitution. Isn’t that method a far better one that letting moralising, deceitful wind-bags stand up in Congress or Parliament to express their tedious, anti-scientific prejudices that have succeeded only in delivering the soul-destroying world we endure now?

(The scientific method, an interactive process in which hypotheses are continually refined to make them more and more robust, is closely related to Hegel’s triadic dialectical method of thesis, antithesis and synthesis. Scientific theories, in a sense, are the synthesis of many preceding phases of thesis and antithesis.)

Extending Rousseau’s idea, could there be a general will common to the whole human race rather than to just a community or nation state? The New World Order seeks to find the general will for the whole world. In this sense, Rousseau’s general will starts to resemble Teilhard’s collective consciousness of humanity, evolving via the noosphere.

The idea of humanity acting with one consciousness is highly utopian. If you could feel your neighbour’s pain via a collective consciousness, you would do everything in your power to help him because it would feel like your own personal pain, and everyone wants to remove their own pain. Suffering, poverty, selfishness, inequality, isolation and alienation would come to an end.

Kant’s moral categorical imperative says, “Act only on that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.” If the State can be characterised as a person with a will then it becomes simple for the State to set categorical imperatives since every moral maxim is automatically a universal law. But if the State is not like this then there can be no categorical imperatives, just moral relativism expressed by sectional interests. Anything that approaches absolute morality, right and wrong, is possible only in a State in which every person is explicitly socially contracted to every other so that everyone acts in his own and everyone else’s interests. In our present society, everyone acts in their own interest and there is no genuine morality.

But would this human collective suffer from groupthink and stagnation? Would it be cumbersome, inflexible, and slow to adapt? Would it be quasi-communist? (It must be emphasised that the Illuminati consider communism as disastrous as free market capitalism. They seek a middle way between these two damaging extremes, based on strong community values. The purpose of the State is to provide for the education, health, defence and economic stability of the nation: everything else can be left to communities, the stronger and more independent the better.)

It is necessary to find the right balance between the individual and the community, between private consciousness and the collective consciousness. If the first is the thesis and the second the antithesis then the synthesis is meritocracy. Meritocracy is all about identifying excellent individuals who are dedicated to improving both themselves and their society. Could that ever be said of the Old World Order? The defining characteristic of the members of the OWO is that they seek excessive wealth and power. In our society, the greedy queue up at the money trough to gorge themselves. Not once do they consider that they are doing anything wrong. These people shouldn’t be allowed within a million miles of positions of power over the body politic.

In the Harry Potter series, a concept called the Horcrux is discussed. It is derived from an old tradition that magicians and wizards can separate their soul from their body. By hiding their soul in a special, secret place, they can safeguard it from harm and make themselves invulnerable. Since their “life” is no longer in their body, they cannot die.

To increase the dramatic effect, the Harry Potter author JK Rowling created the innovation of allowing the soul to be split into many parts, each of which could be placed in a special, magical container called a Horcrux. A master wizard can be killed only when all of his Horcruxes have been destroyed. (Note that a soul is traditionally defined as indivisible, which would make Rowling’s treatment of the soul as splittable absurd.)

Now imagine this scenario: the human race has a single soul that has been distributed amongst every human i.e. every person is a Horcrux. Each human has only a partial not a full soul: all the partials souls are inter-dependent. To destroy humanity’s soul, every human has to be killed.

What if God demanded that in order for humanity to be saved, every partial soul must be good? One evil “partial” soul would condemn humanity to hell. What if God had given humanity a certain amount of time in which to develop a system for ensuring that all partial souls are good?

If humanity is judged on a collective level, not an individual basis, then your fate is tied to everyone else’s. If one person is evil, humanity is finished.

Given that your personal fate and that of the whole of humanity is at stake, what system would you create to ensure that people are good? Isn’t the general will, the collective consciousness, the weltgeist (the world spirit), the volkgeist (the spirit of the people), the anima mundi (the world soul) the answer? Individuals would set aside personal and sectional interests and act only for the common good. If everyone obeys the general will, humanity is saved. If anyone disobeys the general will, even just one person, we are damned.

Imagine that Satan’s mission was to destroy the general will. At every turn, he promotes personal and sectional interests. If he succeeds, humanity is lost and he collects the human soul in his kingdom of hell.

The Old World Order is Satan’s creation for ensuring that selfish interests defeat the general will. He needs power over only one partial soul for him to succeed. As it is, he has power over almost the whole of humanity.

Only the Illuminati stand against him. Only the New World Order, and the expression of the people’s general will, can save us.

(The concept of split souls is not the basis of the Illuminati’s religion, but it serves as a useful way of thinking about the interdependence of human beings, and how we all need to look out for each other.)

If the general will were truly to manifest itself, we would be living in a utopia. There would be no evil and no Old World Order. Isn’t it time we set to work to deliver the world all good people deserve?

Everyone, acting in their rational self-interest, should sign the social contract. No longer should you put yourself or your family above all else. If you really want to do the best for your family, you should do your best for every other family. Our salvation lies in finding the best amongst us and putting them in the most important jobs. Your neighbour should be as important to you as you are, and you to he. The Old World Order’s model of complete selfishness and trampling everyone into the dust in order to ensure that they and theirs prosper must end.

Let’s begin humanity’s most magnificent task, the creation of a New World Order.
__________

The Jacobin Clubs:

In France, members of the Dominican Order of Roman Catholicism were known as Jacobins because their first monastery in Paris was in the Rue St Jacques. When a group of French revolutionaries rented the refectory of a Dominican monastery, they were nicknamed the Jacobin Club. The Jacobins set up chapters all over France and became the dominant force in revolutionary France. The Club was shut down after the fall of its most influential members, the Illuminists Robespierre and Saint-Just.

The Jacobins are often branded proto-communists and extreme left wingers. In fact, they were simply those who wished to create a Republic of just laws based on the principles of freedom, equality and brotherhood. What’s extreme with that? They were determined to bring to an end the evil tyranny of despotic rule by a king and the privileged elites who supported him. What’s wrong with that?

Isn’t it time for new Jacobin Clubs around the world, sustained by the internet? The Jacobin Clubs changed France and the whole world. They did it before and they can do it again. The New World Order – the implementation of Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Social Contract – is the prize that awaits the rebirth of Jacobinism, the irresistible force that destroyed the corrupt monarchy of Louis XVI. Louis was a leading member of the Old World Order. The Jacobins are those who can deliver the world from the stranglehold of the Old World Order. The OWO are terrified of the Jacobins.

Black radical leader Marcus Garvey said, “The whole world is run on bluff. No race, no nation, no man has any divine right to take advantage of others. Why allow the other fellow to bluff you?” Isn’t it time to call the Old World Order’s bluff?

H L Mencken said, “To believe passionately in the palpably not true…is the chief occupation of mankind.”

Christianity, Judaism and Islam are palpably false. Democracy is palpably not government of the people, by the people and for the people. The government and economy of every nation are palpably not under the control of the people. Isn’t it time to wake up? Isn’t it time for the palpably true?

In Great Britain, a so-called advanced nation, more and more of the top jobs are reserved for the privileged elite. Social mobility has gone into sharp reverse. One commentator said, “Far more important to employers than qualifications, it turns out, are those elusive attributes of articulacy, tact and team-working that form the social codes of business and the professions – the attributes, in short, of the white upper middle class. Like it or not, if social mobility is to improve, it is essential for poor children to be taught these codes of the dominant culture.”

What is the message here? Forget merit. If you want to succeed, imitate the dominant upper middle class. Become a modern, corrupt Freemason. What a disgusting and nauseating message. We need the new Jacobins more than ever. We can increase social mobility very easily – by destroying the power of the privileged elites. We don’t need to imitate them. They need to fall into line with the just will of the people.

It’s time to end the rule of the global elite, the masters of the universe, the Old World Order.
__________

12/14

From the English edition of the Vatican’s newspaper L’Osservatore Romano…

“The Vatican today announced that an obscure book purporting to have connections with the secret society known as the Illuminati was added to the unofficial Index Librorum Prohibitorum (List of Prohibited Books). Mike Hockney’s “The Armageddon Conspiracy” makes a thinly disguised attack on Pope Benedict XVI in his previous role as Cardinal Ratzinger, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Hockney makes great play of the fact that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith was formerly known as The Inquisition. He presents an elaborate and ridiculous theory that the Catholic Church, together with the two other Abrahamic religions, worships Satan rather than God. He manages to fit in a plot about the Ark of the Covenant, the Spear of Destiny, the Holy Grail and King Solomon’s Temple, and present the Illuminati in the most positive light as the would-be saviours of humanity. At today’s press conference in the Sistine Chapel, Cardinal…”

That newspaper clipping was sent to us anonymously from a Vatican email address, with no accompanying message or explanation. We knew instantly that it was a fake, and the sender obviously knew we would see through it straight away. So what was the point of the exercise?

The Vatican is the Illuminati’s oldest and deadliest enemy. Its power has faded dramatically in the last couple of centuries, but it is a power nevertheless. The Vatican email address belonged to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) – once known as the Holy Office, or more colourfully, as the Inquisition. What the clipping was designed to demonstrate, we surmised, was that the Inquisition was still monitoring us, still keeping an eye on us, just as it did so assiduously centuries ago. It was simultaneously telling us that it hadn’t forgotten about us, and it was also mocking us because if our book (The Armageddon Conspiracy) had proved a serious threat to them, it would have featured in the genuine Vatican newspaper rather than in a fake version.

The Armageddon Conspiracy portrays the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in a distinctly unflattering light, and presents many heretical ideas of the type the Inquisition tried to stamp out. From our point of view, we were pleased that we had provoked the CDF into a response.

We wanted to show the CDF that we were contemptuous of their faked response, so we placed it on prominently on our website, knowing that the clipping would fool no one who was motivated to check it.

They watch us and we watch them. Nothing has changed. The ancient struggle goes on.

******

Debunking Ourselves: The Vatican Ban

Someone contacted us recently to say that he knew we were frauds and fakes because he had checked the date shown on the newspaper article featured in our article on the “Vatican Ban” and it was plainly wrong and the clipping, therefore, could not be genuine. (Although he did express the opinion that it was so obviously wrong that there must be more to it, and he was certainly right about that.)

Our attitude towards such people is: Excellent! You’ve proved we’re charlatans so now you can leave our site and never come back.

It’s not just the date that would have revealed this newspaper clipping to be an obvious fake. Anyone who knows anything about the Vatican’s newspaper (as we certainly do) would have spotted it instantly as a fake. Even those who have never heard of the Vatican’s newspaper could, in the space of a few seconds, find out what it genuinely looks like.

Type “Vatican Newspaper” into Google. You will be shown the Vatican’s website at the top of the list. Enter the site and you will soon find your way to the Vatican’s newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, which has editions in several languages, including English.

Here’s a link to show you what it looks like:

http://www.vatican.va/news_services/or/or_eng/009w01.pdf

So why do we include such a crass fake on our website?

The reality is this. Many “Conspiracy Theory” websites are frequented by people who, putting it charitably, are half demented. We are a serious organisation seeking to promote our message to equally seriously minded people. We do not want to be a freak show, attracting nuts from far and wide. So, we have deliberately seeded our site with elements designed to repel those who are likely to end up wasting our time. For example, have a look at our article entitled Conspiracy Theories Explained where we dismissively describe Conspiracy Theories as a new religion.

We want people to be extremely skeptical, even towards ourselves. So we placed a deliberately fake newspaper clipping on our site to give them ample ammunition to use against us. If they are easily persuaded away from our site (if and when they discover this fake) then they are not the sort of people we were looking for, and they certainly wouldn’t be receptive to our message. We seek those who can transcend all of the nonsense that is found on so many Conspiracy Theory sites. If you are the type of person who would stick with a site after you have discovered that, in one part at least, it is fake, then it shows that there is something else about the site that is keeping you there. And it is that “something else” that is the arena of interest to us. It shows that you have connected with our site beyond the level of conspiracy theory; you have engaged with it intellectually and spiritually.

And, as it happens, the truth is considerably more complex than mere appearance would suggest. So, the next time another “genius” thinks they have sussed us out and exposed us as frauds, just move along to another website, please. The David Icke website is probably more the sort of thing you’re looking for.

-AC
__________

Zeitgeist:

How many people fully understand Zeitgeist?

http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/
http://www.thevenusproject.com/

Zeitgeist: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M24LOlRuhYk
Zeitgeist Addendum: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbvCxMfcKv4
Zeitgeist Moving Forward: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2FPZrbYWK0

Are you one of the seekers? From our Russian division from 1979 – Stalker by Tarkovsky. Can you cope with the setbacks on the path? Can you confront the enigma and remain undaunted? Can you enter the mysterious Zone and find the Grail?

Thousands of seekers have contacted us in recent months. Many of these candidates are highly promising, but we must emphasise that few are chosen. Do you have the qualities required? Several clues will appear from a number of apparently separate sources. Can you find your way through the maze? Can you put the jigsaw together?

The Soul Camera will dramatize the procedure that occurs when a seeker is recruited, and it will also reveal the perils that recruits face from the enemies of the Grail.
__________

Leviathan:

For centuries, the Illuminati have used a single image to represent everything to which they are opposed. It is the illustration by Abraham Bosse and Thomas Hobbes that appears on the frontispiece of Hobbes’ famous philosophical work “Leviathan”.

“May those who curse days curse that day, those who are ready to rouse Leviathan.” (Book of Job 3:8)

In Christian literature, the Leviathan is an image of Satan. John Milton, in Paradise Lost, uses “Leviathan” to describe Satan’s size and power. In Gnosticism, Satan is identified with Jehovah/Allah/the Christian God. He is the God who demands worship, hymns and prayers, kneeling and bowing, a world in total submission to his tyrannical will. He wants all of us to stand in front of a wailing wall and lament our unworthy existence. He is anathema.
__________

The World Tyrant:

In the picture of Leviathan – Rex Mundi (King of the Earth), the Demiurge, Satan – he wears a monarch’s crown (the symbol of tyranny), and wields a sword (the symbol of oppression) in one hand, and a crozier (the symbol of religious authority) in the other. This is the essence of Satan’s rule: religious, military and royal tyranny. Above Leviathan is a Latin inscription from the Book of Job: Non est potestas super terram quae comparetur ei: “There is no power on earth that compares with it.”

Leviathan is a giant who towers over his dominions. Trapped inside his body are all the slaves worshipping their dark master. They are faceless and nameless, facing inwards while their lord faces outwards.

The slaves are gathered like a congregation at church, in awe before their Satanic master. They are without individuality. All of them are submitting to the tyrant’s power. This is an image of total subordination.

Leviathan is also a symbol of the Old World Order: the triple tyranny of church, army and royalty. How many billions have been enslaved by these three aspects of Leviathan?

The creature’s crown is composed of gold and jewels – symbols of earthly wealth. Leviathan is Mammon. Leviathan is Satan. Leviathan is the Old World Order. Leviathan is unbridled capitalism. Every building in Wall Street should bear the grotesque image of Leviathan. Investment banks are temples to Leviathan, and their CEOs the high priests.

The Illuminati will triumph over Leviathan. The monster will perish. When will the people of the world stop worshipping the sinister forces that have turned them into slaves?

Follow the light. Follow the path of Illumination.
__________

Shabbat:

The tyranny of Leviathan most manifests itself in his chosen religion – Judaism. Look at the ludicrous concept of “Shabbat” in Satan’s special religion. According to the Jews, the “Creator” made the world in six days and rested on the seventh. No one questions the absurdity of “God” resting (never mind the laughable notion that he created the world in six days). What, was he tired, exhausted by his labours?

And because Leviathan rested on the Seventh Day then so must his Chosen People. If they don’t, they will suffer the death penalty according to Mosaic Law (Exodus 31:15): “Everyone that shall do any work on this day shall die.”

In other words, you have no choice about how to spend your day, how to allocate your own time. You are a slave, threatened with death if you don’t comply with the wishes of your controllers.

“Shabbat” is an obscenity. There is a tradition amongst Jews that if every Jew properly observes two consecutive Sabbaths the Jewish messiah will come. The last thing the world needs is a messiah sent by Leviathan. The world has suffered long enough.

Thirty-nine categories of activity are prohibited on Shabbat. People are not allowed to open refrigerators because an automatic light will come on. (An automatic light being activated is considered forbidden work.) People are not allowed to have security lights that are triggered by motion detectors.

As soon as you hear adult human beings worrying about whether or not automatic lights come on, you know you are dealing with creatures entirely under Leviathan’s control, lacking all free will and self-respect. What a preposterous God it is that worries about lights and would gladly sentence people to death if they transgressed by allowing their lights to switch on automatically.

Orthodox Jews frequently mark their territory. They create an area called an “eruv”. It is said that many eruvs (eruvim) even surround areas with substantial non-Jewish populations. Most of the gentiles are unaware that such a ghetto perimeter exists. Though they are physically marked, eruvim are difficult to identify for those who do not know the signs. Pieces of string are often suspended from the tops of posts. Telephone poles and lampposts are frequently used in an eruv. Do not allow yourself to be placed inside the perimeter of an eruv. This is the domain of the creatures of Leviathan. They have no right to place you within their prison.

Leviathan is a jealous, wrathful, partisan god. He is obsessed with appearance and idiotic rules that serve no purpose whatever. He has a peculiar fascination with hair. Women must wear wigs over the hair they were born with. Men mustn’t shave the sides of their faces.

Leviathan’s most zealous followers wear strange clothes that have the inevitable consequence of alienating them from people of other communities. This is the precise intention of their divisive god. He continually constructs rules and regulations that will drive people apart and create conflict. There are even strict laws regarding what food people should eat. People are forbidden from eating pork. Only kosher food must be eaten. What manner of god is obsessed with dietary rules?

When you find a religion full of senseless rules and restrictions, you can tell immediately that you are encountering one of Leviathan’s demonic religions. Leviathan’s religions are about control. They do no advocate freedom, independence, or people thinking for themselves. They revolve around a single concept – “Obey me or suffer the consequences.” They are instruments of tyranny, of forced compliance. They are designed to humiliate people and make them submit to Leviathan’s malevolent will.

Do not let Leviathan control you. Reject all petty rules of absurd, Satanic religions. A God who cares about how you wear your hair, what meat you eat and what clothes you put on is no God at all. The True God would not spend an instant worrying about whether anyone did or did not comply with a ridiculous set of Shabbat requirements.

The True God’s message is one of illuminating the darkness in which humanity is held. He is the perfect master of himself and of nature. He wants us to acquire equal mastery. So, above all, we must overcome all that is slave-minded within us. Leviathan’s religions, on the contrary, are all about emphasising that we are slaves, chaining us to bewilderingly bizarre and mindless rules. Masters look to themselves for freedom. They do not bow and kneel. As soon as we stop prostrating ourselves before Leviathan, we will start to feel strength flowing through us. We need no one to redeem us. We can redeem ourselves if we allow ourselves to step into the light.

Reject Leviathan. Bow to no one. Overthrow the Old World Order, the kingdom of darkness, the realm of Satan.
__________

Meritocracy:

The Illuminati are meritocrats. Only meritocracy, not democracy, can deliver a world where there are neither masters nor slaves. Masters are those who are able to control vastly more resources than others. Therefore, meritocracy advocates preventing anyone from acquiring excessive resources. Only when the richest person in a nation is, say, just ten to twenty times wealthier than the poorest can the circumstances exist for masters and slaves to vanish from society. In a capitalist democracy, the system devised by the Old World Order to allow them to hold the people in their tyrannical grasp, the richest person can be worth a million times more than the poorest. In such a system, the winners take all. The winners are the Old World Order, and the rest of us are losers, suckers, cowards and slaves. But we can change the system at any time. After all, there are vastly more of us. What’s stopping us? Do we have no dignity, no self-respect, no courage?

Why has capitalist democracy proved so apparently successful, to the extent that virtually no one dares to challenge it? No debate in the media ever takes place about the replacement of capitalist democracy. Even during the height of the financial meltdown, no rivals to capitalist democracy were proposed. Why not? Because the masters won’t allow the system that has brought them such spectacular wealth and power to be toppled. Sure, you can change your president or prime minister, but you can’t change the system, and it’s the system that’s the problem, not the identity of the figurehead.

Capitalist democracy is, however, doomed because it is dialectically unstable. Capitalism is an ideology based on extreme inequality. It is an economic system designed by and for masters. It revolves around a tiny number of people – the rich masters with vast amounts of capital – using the labour of slaves (us, the work drones) to generate enormous profits.

Karl Marx predicted that this system would implode and be replaced by communism – the common ownership of all of a nation’s assets by the people – and he would have been proved right had the masters not seen the danger. They produced a brilliant dialectical response – they harnessed democracy to capitalism.

Democracy is an ideology superficially based on equality: one man one vote; every vote has equal weight to every other vote. The masters massively extended the vote to groups that had previously been denied voting rights. In a country like the USA, the ordinary people – the slaves – were allowed the illusion that every four years they could decide who was in charge of their nation. This illusion was all that was needed to persuade the slaves that they were in control of their own destiny, that they were free.

Yet look at an American election such as the one in 2004 – Bush versus Kerry: two extremely wealthy men, both members of Yale’s notorious Skull and Bones Masonic secret society. The genius of using democracy, from the Old World Order’s viewpoint, is that it doesn’t matter for whom the people vote for as long as they – the Old World Order – choose the candidates. If Kerry had won the election, the Old World Order would still have had their man in the White House. It doesn’t matter who wins or loses the election: the Old World Order always stays in charge.

The President is either a member of the Old World Order, or meets with their full approval. Someone like Obama, even though an outsider, is nevertheless someone who will never threaten the Old World Order’s hegemony. He wouldn’t have been allowed to set foot in the White House if the Old World Order thought he would damage their interests. They viewed Obama as a means of reestablishing the credibility of capitalist democracy after the disastrous Bush years.

Obama’s job is to act as a PR man and cheerleader for capitalist democracy. Even his most enthusiastic fans must already see that nothing significant will change under his presidency. The Old World Order’s power will be as strong as ever. There is nothing any President can do to change things. The entire American political and economic system is designed to prevent any serious challenge to capitalism, the bedrock of the Old World Order’s power and riches.

To reiterate, the Old World Order’s power is based on disguising their commitment to inequality (capitalism) by tethering it to democracy, an ideology of equality. The democratic element is sufficient to deceive the slaves while the masters go about their business of greedily serving their own interests. The excesses of the Wall Street Gang in the years leading up to the financial disaster are amongst the most egregious in history, yet this was taking place within a so-called democracy.

Did a single democrat have any say whatsoever in what was going on in Wall Street? Yet who’s picking up the tab now? “No taxation without representation” was the great slogan of the American Revolution, yet the American people have picked up a vast tax bill to bail out the bankers. Did the people have any representation in the boardrooms of Wall Street? None at all! Did they have any say in the enormous salaries, bonuses, pensions, stock options, perks? Don’t you get it? Capitalism is all about the masters while democracy is all about pretending to the slaves that they can change things. They can’t. Not ever.

The other measure the masters took to protect their position was the introduction of welfare provisions. The great revolutions in France and Russia (in 1789 and 1917) took place because the people were literally starving to death and had to fight for their lives. If the rulers of France and Russia had provided a welfare state, no revolutions would have occurred.

The masters now ensure that the slaves have a reasonable degree of comfort. And the slaves are no longer mere workers. They are consumers now, and via consumption they bring more wealth to the masters. By giving us democracy, a standard of living that maintains most of us in reasonable comfort, and the opportunity for us to consume a huge variety of things, the masters create the illusion that we are free rather than slaves. And we fall for it. Yet behind the curtain, the masters control everything. We have traded our self respect and our souls for the baubles they throw at us, for the scraps they toss at us from their high tables. How grateful we are for our petty lives as consumers of the junk they sell us.

Most of us are “respectable” slaves, but there is also an underclass of those who are not judged respectable. Marx referred to the underclass as the “lumpenproletariat”: the “refuse of all classes,” including “swindlers, confidence tricksters, brothel-keepers, rag-and-bone merchants, beggars, and other flotsam of society.” They are dispossessed and powerless. Trotsky believed that the underclass were reactionary and counter-revolutionary, and generally highly supportive of the upper classes.

This is classic slave behaviour: admiring the very people who oppress you. Many of the supporters of the right wing American Republican Party – the main party of the Old World Order – are members of the underclass. They are frequently fundamentalist Christians (Christianity being a slave morality), and advocates of capitalism (even though they themselves have no capital) and have dead-end jobs or no jobs at all. When people vote for the masters who have made them slaves, they have lost all self-respect. They are perfectly brainwashed.

A chain is only as strong as its weakest ink. If our society is regarded as a chain then it is falling apart. Weak links are everywhere, and most visibly in the underclass. The underclass is left to rot. They have few or no prospects of bettering themselves. They are a drain on the rest of society, a source of criminality. A large criminal justice system is required to deal with them. Police, prisons, welfare organisations, community centres, social workers, government agencies are needed in abundance. It costs a fortune to supply all of this (and even then it’s not nearly enough), but to achieve what? Simply to prevent these people going on the rampage.

Is it healthy for society to have a large and growing underclass? But don’t forget why the underclass exists – they have been deliberately starved of resources in order to ensure that the masters – the Old World Order – can enjoy an excess of resources. Imagine that there is set amount of wealth in the world. Everyone who gets more than the average, more than his fair share, is, in effect, depriving others. Is that moral? The Old World Order impoverish the underclass in order to enrich themselves, and the rest of society acts as a buffer between the masters and the lowest slaves.

Under a meritocracy, the absurd inequality that appears under capitalism would be abolished, but so would the sterile and false equality that characterises a system such as communism. Both capitalism and communism are LCD – lowest common denominator – ideologies. In communism, the laziest, most stupid person is guaranteed the same rewards as the hardest-working, most talented person, and hence the talented hard-worker loses any motivation and the system rapidly degenerates. The talented lose all incentive to make optimal use of their skills.

Under capitalism, the production of goods is based on the popularity of those goods, which in turn reflects the quality of the people. A nation full of stupid, untalented people has stupid, untalented tastes. They love popcorn movies, reality TV, game shows, chat shows, sitcoms, hospital, legal and crime dramas and all the rest of the dross that is shown 24/7. A nation of slaves has slave tastes. Everywhere, quality is sacrificed for cheap, gaudy goods with instant appeal. The system is based on short-term gratification and cheap thrills. Everything is disposable. Nothing lasts. In a short time, quality vanishes from capitalism since it simply isn’t profitable enough: there are too few people of quality.

Communism and capitalism are both catastrophic. Marx’s dialectical analysis was wrong. Communism is not the inevitable victor over capitalism. Communism is the equal and opposite pole of capitalism, and just as bad. Extremes of equality and inequality are equally damaging.

Another point must be emphasized about communism. It’s nothing but a secularised form of Christianity. Jesus Christ’s “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”, is simply a different way of saying Marx’s “From each according to his abilities to each according to his needs.” The two systems are morally identical. They both revile masters and promote complete equality. Communism is Christianity without Christ, which is why it is so feared by the leaders of the Christian world. It renders them redundant.

Christianity, unlike communism, has historically found favour with the masters: with emperors, kings and dictators, big bosses and bankers. Why? Because it allows them to exploit the slaves as much as they like. “Render unto Caesar,” says Christ. That means obey your masters. The communists on the other hand say resist your masters. “Turn the other cheek,” says Christ. The communists say, “Better to die on your feet than live on your knees.” Christ says that his people will gain their reward in the afterlife. Communists say that there is no afterlife and the reward must come here and now. “Love your enemies,” says Christ. The communists say overthrow them, with violent revolution if necessary. Christ tells us to respect private property (the masters’ property!) while for the communists all property is theft. At its core, Christianity is ambiguous, a chameleon. Communism is far more honest. No master could ever embrace communism, yet many of the worst masters in history have proudly proclaimed themselves Christian. The Old World Order loves Christianity, one of their greatest instruments of tyranny – as it was always intended to be by its founder, Christ the Deceiver.

The masters spent long decades demonising communism, the ultimate slave ideology. You never heard them breathing a word against capitalism, the most successful master ideology. Instead they demanded, and got, freer and freer markets – less and less regulation and supervision. Cui bono? They didn’t want anyone looking over their shoulders to see what they were up to. Their most profitable deals, the ones that carve up the world between them, must be carried out in the greatest of secrecy with no outside scrutiny.

And look what happened? The world was “treated” to the greatest celebration of greed and excess in world history. The triumph of the masters seemed complete. They even called themselves the “Master of the Universe.” But then came the credit crunch – one of the most calamitous financial disasters of all time. And who paid for the wreckage of the economy? The masters? Don’t be absurd. The slaves footed the bill, as they always do.

The dialectic that propels history has already destroyed communism, the slave ideology. Now it will turn its attention to the disaster of capitalism, the master ideology, and destroy it too. Slaves will become their own masters and masters their own slaves, and thereby all distinctions between master and slave will be negated.

Meritocracy is the higher synthesis of capitalism (the thesis) and communism (the antithesis). It strips them of their weaknesses and magnifies their strengths. It brings an end to the dark age of master and slave politics and economics. It is the culmination of the dialectic. It marks the overthrow of the Old World Order. It is not just desirable, it is inevitable. It is the End of History in terms of economic and political evolution. There is no stage beyond.

Meritocracy is acephalous – without heads, rulers, leaders, masters. They are redundant in a world of talented people where one person is as skilled as another.

Meritocracy is an HCF – “highest common factor” – philosophy. It is not a race for the bottom, but an ascent to the top. In a meritocracy, there are no masters, no slaves, no lowest common denominator, no low quality goods and services, no pandering to the vulgar and cheap to make a fast buck.

Meritocracy advocates collaborative groups of talented individuals, each with valuable expertise. In a world of skilled people there would be no bosses and no workers. If, for some reason, a figurehead were required, that person would be appointed under the principle of primus inter pares – first amongst equals. Those who achieve great things get greater rewards than others, but not to the extent where they can markedly disadvantage others.

Do you think Obama will save you? Think again. Do you think elections every four years will save you? Think again. A revolution is needed, one that replaces both the industrial revolution of capitalism (“dark, Satanic mills”) and the communist revolutions of Marxism. We need a meritocratic revolution that will bring an end to the Old World Order and the religions of Satan.

Don’t forget: any religion or ideology that requires you to bow, kneel, pray, salute, wear special uniforms, adopt submissive postures, roll out a red carpet, adore and worship Gods or heroes is trying to control you. The Satanic world is full of levers of control and brainwashing. Once you are under the control of others you are alienated from yourself. You will never realise your own potential.

Meritocracy is about freeing everyone from control. In a liberated world, capitalism would vanish since it is a master and slave ideology but there would be no more masters and slaves for it to operate upon. Slave religions such as Christianity, Judaism and Islam would disappear. Above all, the Old World Order would be abolished. Isn’t a world without masters and slaves worth fighting for? Isn’t it time to reject capitalist democracy and the slave religions? Isn’t it time for Meritocracy and Illumination?

What are we waiting for?
Embrace the Light.
Embrace Meritocracy.

******

Inheritance is the precise mechanism by which the dead tyrannically rule over the living. When you’re dead, you’re dead. Your wealth does not live on to be inherited by nepotistic scroungers who did nothing to earn it. Inheritance is welfare for rich folk, and no decent person would ever accept it. Inheritance is how the rich control the poor and keep them in their “place”. It’s how the dead rule from beyond the grave. The dead have no legal rights and no stake in the world of the living. Post mortem transfers of wealth, power and influence must be made illegal via Pro Life legislation, i.e. legislation designed to ensure that corpses cannot dictate the future of the human race via selectively handing on decisive financial advantage to the chosen few (the “Chosen People”).

The mission of the rich elites is to set up their families to rule over the rest of us in perpetuity. They call for zero percent inheritance tax, and inheritance is of course the means by which they transmit overwhelming advantage across the generations, how they rig the system, and how they establish the all-powerful cartel from which all the rest of us are excluded if we are fools and cowards enough to go along with it. What is the antidote to dynastic rule, and what is it that the rich elites hate and fear more than anything else? … it’s one hundred percent inheritance tax. Anyone who opposes this tax – the tax that ensures that no dynasty can rule the world via inherited wealth (parasitical wealth, unearned by the deadbeats and dead heads who pathetically grab it because they are incapable of standing on their own two feet and earning their own money by their own sweat and effort) – opposes human progress and freedom. Anyone who resists total inheritance tax supports anti-meritocracy and the dynastic rule of rich elites. We note that all the cretinous conspiracy theorists rage against inheritance tax, and call it “communism” – exactly as required by their rich puppetmasters. Here’s the simple truth of the world:

1) Thesis: Free-market Capitalism … unequal opportunities and unequal outcomes.

2) Antithesis: Communism … equal opportunities and equal outcomes.

3) Synthesis: Meritocracy … equal opportunities and unequal outcomes.

Meritocracy is about the smartest, most talented people … from any background, no matter how humble or disadvantaged … getting to the top so that the rest of us can benefit from their expertise, intelligence and merit. It’s not a question of a rising tide of money raising all boats, but of a rising tide of intelligence and talent.

The proper function of the State is to optimise itself through optimising each and every one of its citizens. It has to maximise the potential of everyone, from any background. The optimal State is the one governed by its smartest and most meritorious citizens – Plato’s Philosopher Kings, who are not allowed to accumulate any private wealth and must be devoted entirely to the public good, the opposite of today’s rulers of the world.

Every person must be allowed to go as far as their talents take them, and that means they must not be up against a rigged system of privilege, cronyism and nepotism, designed to favour the children of the Elite and to obstruct the progress of everyone else.

Free-market capitalism exists to free the capitalists and enslave everyone else. Aren’t you sick of being a slave? Then do something about it. Get off your fucking ass.

-AC

******

No more masters and no more slaves: a world of dynamic communities of talented individuals. The meritocratic world is the platform for humanity to take the next step of its evolution upwards – towards God.
__________

Illuminati Jesuits?:

The leader of the Jesuit Order, the Superior General, is commonly known as the “black pope” – because of both his power and his black vestments.

Such is the degree of loathing and suspicion that attaches to the Jesuits that some conspiracy theorists regard them as the ultimate puppet masters, and some claim that the Illuminati and the Jesuits are the same thing:

http://www.endtimeprophecies.co.za/index.php/beast-doctrines/jesuitorder.
html

So, what is the truth about the Jesuits and the Illuminati?

******

The Jungle Utopias.

The Jesuits, like the Knights Templar before them, were created by the Illuminati to infiltrate and destabilise Catholicism. Both orders were suppressed: the Templars permanently and the Jesuits for a few decades. The Jesuits, by the time they were reinstated, had been purged of virtually all traces of the Illuminati, although it is worth pointing out that in more recent times French Jesuit Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, in his theories concerning the Omega Point and Noosphere, independently created ideas that are not far removed from the tenets of Illumination, the religion of the Illuminati.

Illuminati Grand Master Adam Weishaupt was educated at the Jesuit College in Ingolstadt in Bavaria, and the Jesuits largely controlled the town’s university. Some conspiracy theorists have therefore concluded that the Jesuits created the Illuminati rather than the other way around.

Ingolstadt was actually the headquarters of the Illuminati at that time, and many Jesuits were carrying out duties on behalf of the Illuminati. However, it should not be assumed that all Jesuits were in league with the Illuminati. For decades, the Vatican had been taking increasing control of the Jesuit Order and many if not most Jesuits were, by the late eighteenth century, entirely loyal to the Pope. The Order had, in effect, split into two separate factions. When the Order was suppressed it was so that it could be purged once and for all of all “undesirable” elements. Only when it was felt that the task was complete – after more than a generation – was the Order reinstated. The Vatican had learned from the previous example of the Knights Templar and this time did they did not want to create any new martyrs or myths, so they did not eliminate the Order, but purified it.

The movie The Mission is based on the true story of the Jesuit “Reductions” (missions) in South America. The Reductions provide a glimpse of what type of world the Illuminati wished to create in those days: a New World Order. The Reductions are an illustration of positive liberty. They represent one of the greatest episodes in history, and yet few people know much about this boldest of experiments.

When the Spanish and Portuguese empires conquered South America, many indigenous Indians were plunged into the familiar tale of Old World Order slavery and exploitation. Jesuit missionaries, under the guidance of the Illuminati, tried to help the Indians. They managed to persuade the King of Spain to grant a vast region to their care, in return for generous annual payments to the King’s coffers.

In 1609, the Jesuits established the first mission, and other missions followed over the following years, up to a total of about forty by the first half of the 18th century. Each mission catered for up to 10,000 people i.e. they were the size of small towns.

The Jesuits helped the Indians to create advanced societies. The Reductions had law and order, schools, hospitals, and free public services for the poor. There was no death penalty. The working day was set at 6 hours, compared with the 12-14 hours of the average European worker. The Indians worked the communal land and all produce was fairly divided amongst them. They were skilled in sculpture and woodcarving, and started making watches and musical instruments. In their free time, the Indians enjoyed music, dance, games, sport and reading. They were shielded from the bad influences of the Europeans (alcohol, gambling and venereal disease) and allowed to develop their creativity.

Each Reduction was arranged in a square. On one side were the civic buildings: church, school, hospital, community hall, warehouses for storage, shops etc. On the other three sides were the Indians’ homes.

The missions were extremely efficient. Not only were they self supporting, they produced surpluses of goods, which could then be traded. They were far more economic than comparable communities in Europe. They were said to be the first entirely literate communities in the history of the world. Meritocratic community elders were placed in charge, under the supervision of the handful of Jesuit missionaries in each Reduction. The missions became centres of culture and egalitarian community life. They effectively enjoyed full independence from the territories of South America ruled by Spanish and Portuguese governors.

The Jesuits protected the Indians from European slave-hunters, to the annoyance of the slavers who thought the Jesuits were bad for business and potentially subversive. They worried about what would happen if the Jesuit missions were set up everywhere, including in Europe. Slowly but surely, the Jesuits’ missions were perceived – correctly – as a radical threat to the power of the Old World Order.

The Jesuits’ enemies then claimed that the Jesuits were exploiting the Indians, making vast sums of money from them to enrich themselves, and acting as arrogant lords with airs and graces. Nothing was further from the truth, but the nature of propaganda does not change: in every age, the names of the good are blackened by the bad. In 1767, tensions came to a head and the Jesuits were expelled from the Spanish and Portuguese empires. The missions were destroyed or absorbed into new towns built by the authorities. Slavers captured many of the Indians and the rest returned to the forests and jungles for safety. Another great triumph for the evil OWO!

Little remains to mark the passing of the Jesuits’ Reductions (although the La Santisima Trinidad del Parana Reduction in Paraguay is a UNESCO World Heritage Site). The Old World Order had succeeded in killing off the Illuminati’s great and noble vision. They despised the Jesuits’ resistance to slave raids, and the autonomy and economic success of the Reductions. They despised the good education and high standards of health care enjoyed by the Indians. They despised the Indians’ lack of subservience to nobles, kings and emperors. They despised these jungle utopias where primitive Indians were turned into far more than noble savages: they became clever, skilled members of communities that were not based on power, riches and status. When they looked at the Reductions, the OWO saw a new society that might overthrow everything they stood for. So they eliminated the threat.

In 1773, the Jesuit Order was formally suppressed throughout all Catholic lands. In 1814, with the Order completely purged of all non-orthodox influences, and under strict instructions never again to challenge the power and economic interests of the nobility, it was reinstated. The Jesuits had become the poodles of the Papacy.

All good, thinking people should see that what the Illuminati inspired Jesuits attempted in the jungles of South America centuries ago was a magnificent endeavour, a heroic attempt to create a utopia free of the iniquities and corruption of the Old World Order. That’s why the Reductions were ruthlessly stamped out.

We are told that we need to live in capitalist cities, full of all the ills of our fallen modern world. Do we? Our cities are impersonal machines, designed for the convenience of the OWO, to maximise the profits of big business, and to allow close control and surveillance of the masses. We could replace our appalling, inhuman, congested, dirty and dangerous cities with 21st century Reductions: small, efficient, economic communities of 10,000 people. (Jean-Jacques Rousseau – whose ideas are discussed in detail in the next section – was a strong advocate of communitarian politics. Community, more than anything else, is what has been lost in our modern societies.) Wouldn’t they be things of awesome beauty? The world would be transformed. The time of monarchs, Masons and Wall Street fat cats would end. This age of soul-destroying materialism, consumerism, cheap entertainment, junk food and junk values would be over at long last. Humanity could reach out towards its higher self, freed from the chains of the Old World Order.

Isn’t it time to start again the great project of the Illuminati’s Reductions, designed for the 21st Century? Isn’t it time for community rather than anonymous, soulless, capitalist cities: the dark, Satanic mills of the Old World Order? Isn’t it time for a New World Order?
__________

11/14