Dacia Iluministă

THIS IS ONE OF A SERIES OF BOOKS outlining the religion, politics and philosophy of the ancient and controversial secret society known as the Illuminati, of which the Greek polymath Pythagoras was the first official Grand Master. The society exists to this day and the author is a member, working under the pseudonym of “Adam Weishaupt” – the name of the Illuminati’s most notorious Grand Master.

The Illuminati’s religion is the most highly developed expression of Gnosticism and is called Illumination (alternatively, Illuminism). Dedicated to the pursuit of enlightenment, it has many parallels with the Eastern religions of Hinduism, Buddhism and Taoism. It rejects the Abrahamic religions of faith: Judaism, Christianity and Islam, considering these the work of the “Demiurge”; an inferior, cruel and wicked deity who deludes himself that he is the True God, and who has inflicted endless horrors on humanity.

If you wish to judge for yourself how deranged the Demiurge is, you need only read the Old Testament, the story of the Demiurge’s involvement with his “Chosen People”, the Hebrews. You may wonder why the “God of All” entered into an exclusive and partisan Covenant with a tribe in the Middle East several thousand years ago, why he promised them a land (Canaan) that belonged to others, and why he then actively participated with them in a genocidal war against the Canaanites. Even more bizarrely, according to Christian theology, he then dispatched all of those Hebrews, whom he had supported so fanatically, to Limbo – the edge of Hell – when they died. They couldn’t go to Heaven because they were indelibly marked by the “Original Sin” of Adam and Eve. Only the atonement provided by the agonising death of God’s “son”, Jesus Christ, could wipe the slate clean and allow the Hebrews to be released from Limbo. But there was a catch. Only those who accepted Jesus Christ as their Lord and Saviour were eligible for Paradise.

Of course, the Chosen People of “God” have almost entirely rejected Jesus Christ. Therefore, from the Christian perspective, nearly all of the Chosen People are now in hell proper. Don’t you find God’s behaviour distinctly odd? Indeed, unbelievable? Don’t alarm bells start ringing? Doesn’t the behaviour of this God sound rather more like what would be expected of Satan?

Remember that this same “God” ordered Abraham to perform human sacrifice on his own son, Isaac. Abraham, rather than rejecting this monstrous command, rather than denouncing the creature that gave it as evil incarnate, agreed to butcher his own flesh and blood to demonstrate how slavishly and mindlessly obedient he was – the prototype of all psychopathic, fanatical “believers”.

Does God’s command to Abraham sound like something that would ever pass the lips of the True God? We pity you if you think it does because you are surely a creature of the Demiurge and one of the legions of the damned. If, however, you doubt the credentials of the Abrahamic God, you may be receptive to the message of the Illuminati and our future-oriented, rational, scientific, mathematical and dialectical religion of light – Illumination.
__________

Quotations:

“There is no fortress so strong that money cannot take it.” –Cicero

“An honest politician is one who when he is bought will stay bought.” –Simon Cameron

“A rich man’s joke is always funny.” –Thomas Brown

“The politician is an acrobat: he keeps his balance by saying the opposite of what he does.” –Maurice Barrès

“The faults of the burglar are the qualities of the financier.” –George Bernard Shaw

“There are but two families in the world: Have-much and Havelittle.” –Cervantes
__________

OWO – The Old World Order:

“[The professed object of the Illuminati is], by the mutual assistance of its members, to attain the highest possible degree of morality and virtue, and to lay the foundation for the reformation of the world by the association of good men to oppose the progress of moral evil.” –Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, Albert G. Mackey

It’s often claimed that neocons, Freemasons, various powerful secret societies etc. are conspiring to create a New World Order – a one world oppressive government, supposedly. In fact the groups mentioned constitute not the “New” but the Old World Order and their agenda is to keep extending their existing political and economic model that has served them so well for so long. There is absolutely nothing new about it. “Globalisation” is their key word. That is their code for complete OWO control of the world. When former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown spoke of “the birth pangs of a new global order,” he was referring to the political and economic domination of the whole world by the OWO.

“New World Order” is a misnomer unless used in the context defined by the Illuminati. A New World Order means a new political, economic and religious configuration of the world. It does not mean an existing model simply extended further. A New World Order is precisely that – something never seen before. It is the gateway to a greater and nobler humanity.

The Old World Order’s plan is not mysterious or strange. It is the simplest one imaginable, and it is tacitly supported by many people who claim to oppose the Old World Order. It is this: how do I ensure that my family is more successful than other families? As soon as you let that thought enter your head you are damned. It is the gospel of the Old World Order, their morality, their path to “salvation”.

The issue could not be simpler. If you have the opportunity to place your family above more talented families, what will you do? Will you make the most of that chance, or will you refrain? Will you sacrifice the interests of your family to those of more talented strangers, or will you do everything in your power to give your family an advantage over those strangers? Do not call yourself a meritocrat if you want the untalented members of your family to prosper more than the talented members of other families.

The remarkably untalented Bush family has dominated American political life because it is the ultimate manifestation of the desire of the American family to glorify itself no matter that it lacks any trace of merit. But are not all families like that? That is what the Old World Order relies on. It succeeds because it is the ordinary family writ large. All typical families would do the same in their position. They would use their wealth and power to rig the system in favour of the members of their family. They do not care about the objective merits of their family, or of other families.

If you are a genuine meritocrat, you would support the most meritorious person over a close member of your own family. How many would actually do that in practice?

There can be a fair world only if there is a willingness to acknowledge the superior merit of others. That is the great challenge to humanity. It is also the only way for any family to get true justice. If you do not believe in merit then you will be ruled by rich and privileged families such as the Bush family. They have used their advantages to the maximum, and your children have paid the price. And you do not deserve any better.
__________

The Old World Order II:

“When you control a man’s thinking you do not have to worry about his actions. You do not have to tell him not to stand here or go yonder. He will find his ‘proper place’ and will stay in it. You do not need to send him to the back door. He will go without being told. In fact, if there is no back door, he will cut one for his special benefit. His education makes it necessary.” –Dr. Carter Godwin Woodson

We resist two groups – the Old World Order and the group that stands behind them. For the time being, we shall say nothing more about the organisation that hides behind the curtain. The Old World Order are dupes, but they are unaware of it. Their game is the oldest one of all – power. How to get it and how to maintain it. These are the key points about the OWO, their modus operandi:

1) The OWO is a global network of dynastic families.

2) Their mission is to maintain the power and wealth of their dynasties in perpetuity.

3) Others are admitted to the charmed circle only if they can assist the interests of the OWO.

4) The OWO do not care about the welfare of ordinary citizens. Ordinary people simply do not show up on their radar as long as they go about their humdrum lives in the expected way.

5) The OWO have no plans to build concentration camps, or slave encampments or anything else. Such measures would consume vast resources, create unnecessary trouble and serve no useful function. The OWO can sedate the people by the use of TV, Hollywood, video games, porn, music, alcohol, recreational drugs, sport, social networking etc. All of these diversions ensure that the people will never rise up. While mindless mass entertainment exists, the OWO require no concentration camps to control the people.

6) The Bush family is the quintessence of the OWO. Father and son belonged to Yale’s Skull and Bones secret society and both became presidents. Another son is a former Governor of Florida and a potential future president. How can one family in a so-called democracy have achieved this degree of power?

7) The Bush family illustrates the workings of the OWO perfectly: very rich, very powerful, very connected, and likely to bestride the American political scene for generations.

8) The OWO do not obsessively control every aspect of life. What they do is take active steps to massively increase the likelihood that they and theirs will have vastly better chances in life than everyone else. George Bush, with his limited abilities, would have achieved nothing significant in life were his name not Bush. Yet because that is his name, he was an American President. The OWO always put family above talent. This is practically enshrined as an American principle, and enjoys huge popular support, yet its inevitable consequence is that it creates unmeritocratic family dynasties that endure for millennia, and you can be certain the Bush family will continue to be such a dynasty.

9) Most people are familiar with America’s great dynastic families: they are associated with oil, banking, entertainment, media, military, the intelligence services and politics.

10) The OWO are international. American dynastic patriarchs have much more in common with Russian oligarchs than they do with ordinary Americans.

11) The Old World Order’s models are the Roman Empire at the time of Augustus Caesar, and the English monarchy at the time of Henry VIII.

12) The OWO are advocates of dynastic rule. Look at America: George Bush, father and son – both American presidents; the Kennedys – they could have been in power for decades had they not broken the rules of the OWO and paid the price; the Clintons – husband was president and wife still could be; daughter might be in the future. Dynastic presidencies have become de rigueur in modern America. How did this come about? By accident or design?

13) The Roman emperors advocated “panem et circenses” – bread and circuses. As long as citizens have fast food and cheap entertainment to pacify them, they will not cause serious trouble. Revolutions occur when the ordinary people are starving and have nothing to distract them from their suffering. Can a revolution be launched in the absence of these factors?

14) The Romans had a patrician class (the wealthy and powerful) and a plebeian class (the ordinary people). Isn’t it the same in America? The super-rich, the Ivy League brigade, spoiled heiresses, the political, media, military, business, banking and legal elites. They are the American patrician class. Everyone else is a plebeian.

15) Roman gladiators were worshipped by the plebeians. What do the Americans have? – super-celebrities from Hollywood, TV, rock ‘n’ roll and sport, worshipped by legions of American plebeians.

16) In ancient Rome, artists and intellectuals were a joke. They were usually Greek slaves. Look at artists and intellectuals in America. They are not at the forefront of the national consciousness. The OWO despise intelligence amongst plebeians and do their utmost to ensure that plebeians are poorly educated. They advocate and encourage “dumbing down”.

17) The Roman Empire was founded on slavery. So was America. The ordinary American people are still slaves. The only difference is that the oppression they suffer is not overt.

18) Look at the British Royal family. The Queen refers to the British people as her “subjects”. She can’t be removed as head of state. Her crown, her status, her wealth and power will be automatically transmitted to her son. No one else is eligible. Merit in Britain is effectively illegal since the head of state is never at any stage subjected to any meritocratic criterion. Britain remains one of the most class divided societies in the world.

19) Look at British politicians. Tony Blair, from a highly privileged background, was a recent prime minister, and now his children are being groomed to follow in his footsteps. The new British Prime Minister, David Cameron, leader of the Conservative Party, is one of the richest men in the nation. He is an “old Etonian” (Eton College is the most privileged school in the world) and was a member of the super elite Bullingdon Club at Oxford University. His closest colleagues all come from similarly privileged backgrounds. Like Cameron, the current Mayor of London and the Chancellor of the Exchequer both attended the Bullingdon Club.

20) America has had forty-four presidents and two of them have been the father and son team of the Bush’s. What are the odds?

21) Three of the forty-four presidents have been members of the tiny, elite secret society Skull and Bones. What are the odds? John Kerry, the Democratic candidate in 2004, was a member of Skull and Bones. In other words, no matter if you voted Democrat or Republican in 2004, you would still get a Skull and Bones man in the White House. And you think you have a choice? Choice is an illusion in so-called democracies. Democracy is an instrument used to control the people and make them vote for their OWO oppressors. You are much less likely to oppose someone for whom you have voted. You have bought into their mind control system. What good is a vote if you can only vote for the two people they decide to put in front of you? In order for them to be permanently in charge, they simply need to ensure that they control the process by which the presidential candidates are chosen. Then, when you vote, you are invariably voting for one of their people, not one of yours.

22) No doubt there are more Bushs, more Kennedys, more Skull and Bones members being lined up for future high political office.

23) If you’re not one of the patricians, you’re a nobody. People could choose to stand up and do something about it but they don’t because they have been stupefied by the rhetoric and propaganda of the patrician class, they have got their bread and circuses that keep them endlessly distracted, they have their gladiator heroes to worship, their army of imperial conquest to support, their conspiracy theorists to mock, and their ‘freedom and democracy’ to trumpet.

24) The symbolic head of the Old World Order is the Queen of England. When she parades through the streets, legions of people wave flags and cheer. They are ecstatic about being her subjects – her acknowledged inferiors in every way. That shows you the power of the tyrants. Now imagine a hereditary monarchy with executive power. That’s what the Old World Order seek. They dream of dynastic marriages. Imagine a future where the Prince of America marries the Princess of China. That’s what’s coming if the Old World Order achieves its full ambition.

******

The Old World Order is all about establishing a permanent patrician class. It looks to the mediaeval concept of the monarch appointed by “divine right” and able to pass the crown down the family line forever. The Old World Order has in fact already achieved about 90% of its agenda. Ordinary people don’t get a look in when it comes to genuine power and the best jobs. They’re not in the game. They’re plebeians. What’s worse, they deserve to be. They have it within our power to overthrow the patricians at any time. Instead, they let them rule. There are no excuses.

The movie The Matrix is an excellent metaphor for the workings of the OWO. The controllers of the Matrix are the OWO. Most people are oblivious to the truth. Only a handful care, and only they see “reality”. Mr Smith and his fellow super agents are the OWO’s enforcers who will deal with anyone showing any signs of resistance. But they don’t need to intervene too much because hardly anyone causes any trouble. Even some who have tasted the truth (like “Cypher” in The Matrix) decide that they would prefer to go back to the world of enslavement (made delightful by the power of fantasy – the taste of “real” steak).

Are you happy to be a compliant citizen of the Matrix, or are you prepared to join the resistance? Wake up. Stop voting for the OWO. Stop supporting them. Stop making their lives easy. Stop bowing down to them simply because they are wealthy. Their wealth was gained through manipulation, not merit. If you are a slave to money then you are a pawn of the OWO. They control wealth and hence they control all those who buy into the wealth system.

Dick Fuld, former chief executive officer of the failed Lehman Brothers investment bank, made $500 million dollars while he was at the helm. A half a billion dollars for the man who presided over one of history’s greatest financial catastrophes! The bank no longer exists. Fuld is not in jail, is not being prosecuted, is not being pursued by state agencies to surrender his earnings that are now seen to be the profits of breathtaking speculation and incompetence that destroyed the bank.

Many people have paid the price of the collapse of Lehman Brothers. One person who did not was the man most responsible. That is the way the Old World Order operate. Everyone suffers except them. Isn’t it time to wake up and smell the coffee? There are still enough truth seekers in the world to make a difference. The flame of resistance has not yet been extinguished. And never forget – behind the Old World Order stands something much worse.
__________

Goldman Sachs:

The Old World Order has at its core one immensely powerful organisation. This organisation is the base of the Old World’s operations. Behind the closed doors of this organisation, the great plots are devised that keep the people in bondage. When conspiracy theorists talk about the Illuminati standing in the shadows arranging a New World Order, what they are really talking about is this organisation. It is one of the triumphs of this organisation that it has been able to transfer its well-deserved reputation as the puppetmasters – the men behind the curtain – to the Illuminati.

But the leaders of this key OWO organisation are not behind any curtains. They are standing right in front of us. They are highly visible and they are everywhere. They pull the levers right in front of our faces and we do nothing. The Illuminati detest this organisation and seek its end. If this organisation were to disappear from the world stage, no greater blow could be struck for freedom. The organisation in question is the notorious Goldman Sachs investment bank. In a famous article in Rolling Stone, journalist Matt Taibbi began a long attack on Goldman Sachs with the following explosive statement: “The first thing you need to know about Goldman Sachs is that it’s everywhere. The world’s most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money. In fact, the history of the recent financial crisis, which doubles as a history of the rapid decline and fall of the suddenly swindled dry American empire, reads like a Who’s Who of Goldman Sachs graduates.”
__________

The Puppetmasters:

If you have doubts about the existence of the Old World Order, they ought to vanish when you read Taibbi’s article. You will see how an organisation makes itself so powerful (and is allowed to do so) that it effectively becomes a global government and bank, shaping the world’s economy and politics for its own selfish ends. If Goldman Sachs were attempting to create a New World Order that would raise humanity to a new, higher level, its mission might be welcomed and embraced. But it is doing the opposite. It is the Old World Order seeking to maintain a rich, privileged elite in perpetual wealth and power, with everyone else reduced to humiliating roles in a supporting cast of hangers-on, suckers and slaves.

As Taibbi says, “The bank’s unprecedented reach and power have enabled it to turn all of America into a giant pump and dump scam, manipulating whole economic sectors for years at a time, moving the dice game as this or that market collapses, and all the time gorging itself on the unseen costs that are breaking families everywhere — high gas prices, rising consumer credit rates, half eaten pension funds, mass layoffs, future taxes to pay off bailouts. All that money that you’re losing, it’s going somewhere, and in both a literal and a figurative sense, Goldman Sachs is where it’s going. The bank is a huge, highly sophisticated engine for converting the useful, deployed wealth of society into the least useful, most wasteful and insoluble substance on Earth — pure profit for rich individuals.”

Taibbi is absolutely correct. Goldman Sachs is an engine for generating obscene profits for the super-rich. Why is such an engine allowed to exist?

No nation on earth would explicitly entrust its armed forces – its defence – to a powerful commercial company with rich shareholders that, independently of government, could declare war. In such circumstances, the army might be sent off to fight ridiculous wars that would enormously boost the value of companies in the military industrial complex, handsomely reward the shareholders and do nothing whatever for the benefit of the nation. Think about the Vietnam War. Cui bono? Think about the American and British armies in Iraq and Afghanistan. What were they doing there? Were they defending America and Britain, or were they carrying out the will of a commercial organisation and its wealthy shareholders, all of whom profited massively from the war?

If a government declares a war that isn’t necessary for the defence of the nation then you can be certain that forces behind the scenes that wish to engineer war for their own private interests are manipulating the government. The Iraq War is the classic example, a war that has proved disastrously counterproductive for America and Britain. Goldman Sachs was behind that war.

Goldman Sachs is a Zionist organisation and one of its great aims is to secure the defence of the state of Israel. Iraq under Saddam Hussein was a serious threat to Israel and so had to be removed. Control of Iraq would give Goldman Sachs access to plentiful cheap oil. Goldman Sachs wanted to seed the Middle East with western capitalist democracies over which it could then extend its dominion. It anticipated a “domino effect” – first Iraq would become a model of western values amongst the Arab nations of the Middle East and then, one by one, the other Islamic nations would adopt the same model. As each domino toppled, Israel would become safer, Goldman Sachs would get more oil, more influence, and more power. Its reach would extend further than ever before. The Iraq War was perfect – for Goldman Sachs. And that was why George W Bush, a puppet of
Goldman Sachs, declared war and dragged the American people (and the British thanks to Bush’s poodle Tony Blair) into an idiotic war that achieved nothing of worth.

Now consider the Credit Crunch. During the height of the crisis when banks were on the verge of collapse because of the irresponsible and reckless gambles they had taken, what happened? Did the world debate what needed to be done? Were ordinary people consulted? Did everyone implicated in the financial meltdown get fired? Or did a tiny group of elite, privileged bankers, economists and politicians – the very people who had caused the Credit Crunch in the first place – gather in a cabal, far from cameras and public scrutiny, and decide what actions to take? Did the people appoint these bankers and economists? Were the bankers and economists carrying out the people’s will? Like hell they were. They were members of the Old World Order, protecting and advancing their own interests. And the vast majority were linked to Goldman Sachs in one way or another. Business as usual.

The biggest scam in history has taken place right in front of our faces and we have done nothing. Already, huge profits are flowing again through investment banks like Goldman Sachs and they are once again paying outrageous bonuses to their greedy staff. Not a single thing has changed. Not a single demonstrator is out on the streets to protest. Such is the power of the OWO. Such is the weakness and cowardice of the people.

While the British taxpayers were being ordered to bail out the banking leviathan RBS (Royal Bank of Scotland) from the financial catastrophe it had brought on itself and the nation, Sir Fred “the Shred” Goodwin, the discredited chief executive was sitting in a luxury boardroom working out the terms of a highly lucrative severance package, including a fabulous pension that he could enjoy immediately despite being only 50, instead of being fired on the spot without any compensation as should have happened. (Goodwin’s religion is a matter of controversy, but his mother is Jewish, making him technically a Jew. The significance of this point will become apparent later on.)

If the ordinary people were allowed into that boardroom rather than Goodwin’s friends, allies and cronies, he would have been unceremoniously thrown out without a penny. But that never happens. The people are never consulted. They are never represented in the boardrooms of power. The Old World Order would never tolerate their presence. Their entire game is to ensure that the people are always excluded.

Ask yourself this question. Are the interests of rich bankers the same as those of the nation? Are bankers committed to doing what is best for the nation or what is best for themselves and their shareholders? The latter is self-evidently true. Do the bankers have a decisive influence over the economy? Unquestionably yes. Banks are the core of any nation’s economy, providing the lifeblood (money) that flows through the system and keeps it alive. Are any bankers elected by the people to represent the people’s interests? The answer is no. Therefore no one can deny that the economy of a nation is allowed to be in the hands of individuals unaccountable to the people who have different interests from those of the people. Whatever happened to “no taxation without representation”?

Does it make any sense for any nation to permit its economy to be outside the direct control of the people? Bankers serve their own interests, not those of the people. To allow them to run the economy is as ridiculous as allowing Coca Cola to run the US Army. You can’t have unelected, private corporations dictating to the people. The entire basis of the banking system is wrong and contrary to the healthy functioning of the economy. The financial meltdown would never have happened if the banks were tasked with serving the efficient running of the economy in the interests of every citizen. The meltdown was caused by a few greedy people taking enormous risks to bag themselves vast profits beyond the dreams of Midas. And no one stopped them. Why? Because these unelected individuals are the true power in the land. The government does their bidding. And when disaster comes along, the government turns to them to decide what to do next. It’s as insane as asking Jesse James’s gang to become security consultants at Fort Knox just after performing the biggest robbery in history.

No taxation without representation is the most ironic statement ever. The American people are, to all intents and purposes, entirely unrepresented when taxation decisions are being taken. The Old World Order – the fat bankers of Wall Street, unelected and contemptuous of the public – are the people who decide taxation policy. And Goldman Sachs is at the heart of the evil cabal. When will the people wake up? Banks must be brought under the nation’s direct control just as the army (supposedly) is. The army defends the nation and the banks support the economy. What could be simpler? No one should vote for any political party that is not committed to making banks accountable to the people. The banks’ CEOs should be appointed in the same manner as Supreme Court justices, with a remit to serve the public interest. Their salaries and bonuses should be comparable to those of government officials, namely good but far from spectacular.

According to the International Monetary Fund, the global credit crunch has cost governments (and hence taxpayers) more than ten trillion dollars. Why is no one in jail for causing that amount of damage to the economy? If terrorists had caused a fraction of that damage, they would be hunted until doomsday. Yet other than sacrificial offerings like Bernard Madoff, the Jewish super con man whom no one could possibly defend, no one lays a finger on the big, fat bankers. “There will be no whitewash at the White House,” said disgraced President Richard Nixon. In fact, that’s all there is at the White House. No real decisions are taken there. Go to the boardroom of Goldman Sachs if you want to be present at where American and world policy is actually decided. There should be a Supreme Economic Council – analogous to the Supreme Court – which explicitly sets out the nation’s economic policy and the role of the banks. Imagine the latest crazy derivatives product, or the latest whizzy idea to sell sub-prime mortgages to people with no money, having to be okayed by Nobel Prize winning economists on the Supreme Economic Council. All of the mad money-grabbing schemes would be killed at birth.

Imagine a Council with a complete overview of everything every bank is doing. The Council would immediately see if any bank were acting in a destabilising manner. The Council would tightly regulate the salaries and bonuses of finance staff. Sober, risk-averse, modest individuals aware of their responsibilities to the nation’s economic health would replace cowboys, “masters of the universe” and “big swinging dicks”. Financial stability would be the onus of the Council’s remit. With effective regulation of remuneration packages, you could be sure that boom and bust would vanish forever. But that’s never going to happen, is it? The Old World Order will brook no interference in the extravagant amounts of money they pay themselves. It’s up to us to stop them. They often refer to their financial package as “compensation”, as though they are enduring some terrible trauma in horrific conditions, for which vast amounts of money are the only way to make their nightmare tolerable. They should try working down a coal mine, or in any minimum wage job.

Then they will discover what a nightmare really is. Never again during a financial crisis should a cabal of unelected individuals be able to conspire behind closed doors to “fix” the disaster that they themselves engineered. How stupid are we to allow them to get away with it? How long will we endure this situation? When will we do something about it? The economy, like the military, is too important to be left in the hands of groups and individuals outwith the nation’s control.

A government-controlled banking system can still be competitive and innovative. In the same way that military chiefs – without being paid stratospheric salaries and enormous incentive payments – can compete and innovate to produce more effective tactics and strategies, so can banking bosses. The military should be the model for the banking system: public servants serving the national good, people for whom duty and service to their country are far more important than personal profit. Generals and admirals are comfortably off, but don’t belong to the ranks of the super-rich. Why should it be any different for bankers? Why can’t they serve the nation rather than themselves?

To bring a single organisation – Goldman Sachs – to its knees would deliver a fatal blow to the Old World Order and finally liberate humanity. Every time another fat cat banker grabs another vast bonus from the enormous money trough, it’s a nail in the coffin of the ordinary people. We can’t allow ourselves to be treated this way any longer. Isn’t it time we set to work to pull down the temples of money where the high priests of Mammon hold sway?
__________

No You Can’t:

Barack Hussein Obama is a lightweight, Facebook politician who has done little in his life other than study and regurgitate the speeches of Martin Luther King. Is he a stooge of the Old World Order? Obama has benefited from being the multi-cultural candidate par excellence: half black, half white, half Christian, half Muslim, half professor, half celebrity, half intellectual, half man of the people, half activist, half preacher, half establishment figure, half civil rights campaigner. He is a man for all seasons, a rainbow canvas upon which the masses can project any image they like. He has proved a mediocre if not disastrous president. Nothing significant has changed. The people who were wealthy and powerful at the start of his term of office will be wealthy and powerful at the end of it. Those who were impoverished and powerless at the start will be exactly the same at the end.

People wonder how the Old World Order could allow such a person to become President. If they are so powerful, why didn’t they stop him? The truth is that the Old World Order are expert players and know when to rein back. The degree of unpopularity of George W Bush was becoming a serious problem, and beginning to undermine the foundations of democracy. Since the Old World Order rely on democracy as their political vehicle for manipulating the sedated masses, they saw the need to perform a democracy makeover. New ingredients had to be injected to reinvigorate it. Who better to turn to than an unchallenging, charismatic black man? He poses no threat to the Old World Order’s agenda, yet he gives hope of change to hundreds of millions. At a stroke, the Old World Order have saved their necks. What they fear most is revolution: the sort of Illuminati inspired uprisings that overturned the decadent French monarchy in 1789 and the arrogant Russian imperial family in 1917. Democracy provides the stable political base from which they can extend their power. If democracy is threatened, so is the Old World Order. Obama is style over substance, soundbites over meaningful policies. He talks the talk but won’t walk the walk. In fact, his hands are tied. Rhetoric is the last resort of the man of no action. Obama provides the illusion of hope, but does not deliver. Yet who cares?

Democracy has been rescued for the next few years. The problem for the Old World Order is where they go next. Once Obama fails, people’s disillusionment will be much higher than before. Once the first black president is seen to be as ineffectual as the Masonic white presidents, what then? Even the most gullible supporter of democracy will wise up. And once the Old World Order’s political base is lost, everything is up for grabs. The sorry tale of New Orleans in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina reveals the real America. The world was horrified when it saw the conditions in which many Americans actually live. As many commentators observed, this was more like a third world country than the planet’s hyper power. The media poodle controlled by the Old World Order do not usually show the astonishing poverty endured by so many Americans, their lack of the most rudimentary health care, their long hours working for a pittance. No, the media choose to focus on cretinous distractions such as celebrity culture. There are endless items on Britney Spears and Paris Hilton; nothing on the third world underbelly of the USA. The media tell “feel-good” stories, tales of heroism, tales of success, tales of the American Dream coming to life. They never tell the truth about America: an Old World Order tyranny where tens of millions live in dire conditions with no hope of ever escaping.

Nothing will change under President Obama. He made his way to the top of the pile because he knew how to play the game i.e. he knew how to secure the support of the Old World Order. He will do nothing to deliver poor Americans from their eternal bondage. And then what? Members of the anti-NWO movement have described Obama as the Antichrist prophesied in the Book of Revelation. Yet this was the man who fluffed his lines when swearing his oath of office, and delivered an uninspiring inaugural address. Is that what Antichrists are made of these days?
__________

2/9

The political debate in the media is controlled by a small number of individuals (no more than a hundred people, all of a similar ilk and from identikit backgrounds). They drive the agendas to which politicians respond. You know exactly who the small group of commentators are. You see them on TV, you hear them on the radio, you see their columns in the newspapers and political publications – I’m talking about the same people each time. They are everywhere, expressing their tiresome opinions over and over. No other opinions are heard. No outsiders are admitted. The debate is devoid of intellectual content. You will never hear any of these people mentioning the great political philosophers of history, just as you never hear politicians mentioning political philosophy (which you might naively consider their stock in trade).

Instead of hearing the provocative opinions of great thinkers, we’re bombarded with the petty thoughts of intellectual pygmies. One prominent political programme refers constantly to Itchy and Scratchy. It’s funny on The Simpsons – it’s frightening on a political TV programme. The same programme regularly features such giants of the political scene as lap-dancing impresario Peter Stringfellow (accompanied by pole dancers; free entry to Stringfellows for the presenter as a quid quo pro perhaps?). Is this what we’ve come to?

Vote for the Meritocracy Party and get rid of all of these idiots. Let’s have proper intellectual engagement with proper intellectual ideas.
__________

There are Two Sides to Every Story – Not:

Often, when faced with a difficult issue, we may find that we lean 55% (ish) towards one view of the issue and 45% (ish) towards the diametrically opposite view. In other words, the answer is rarely obvious. Yet when people come down on one side or the other, they soon imagine that their decision is 100% firm and correct. They have entirely forgotten that it was a marginal decision and there were strong arguments on both sides. They forget the powerful contrary arguments, and remember only the considerations that supported their decision. The truth – that there are two sides to every story – is replaced by the false certainty that there is only one right answer. Ambiguity is dispelled. Black and white replace grey. And therein lies most of the problems and disputes of the human race. When anyone puts forward any argument, they could just as easily, if they put their mind to it, endorse precisely the opposite position almost as convincingly. So why don’t they?

Those who support the abolition of inheritance tax, for example, could probably find excellent reasons for raising inheritance tax to 100% for everyone i.e. no one can inherit anything. All resources accumulated by an individual are given to the State when the individual no longer requires them. That would be the ideal meritocratic outcome. Yet people put so much effort into selectively marshalling the “facts” in favour of a certain view and ignoring the other facts that point the opposite way. We’re designed this way – it helps us to make decisions, and life is all about making decisions. But shouldn’t we be concerned about making the right decisions, not the decisions that are most convenient for us?
__________

The Patron Saint of the Greediest Industrialists:

In Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand wrote a fictional account of what would happen if America’s top industrialists went on strike. America’s capitalist leaders love Rand because she portrayed them as brilliant, inspirational heroes, without whom the country would fall apart. How to reconcile Rand’s paeans to these “masters of the universe” with the adage that the graveyards are full of people who thought they were indispensable? The Meritocracy Party would welcome a strike by top industrialists. They would instantly be replaced by much cheaper, and vastly more talented, individuals. Who is it who promotes the myth that industrialists are indispensable? Well, the industrialists themselves, of course – and their cronies in the media. It’s all part of the rigged system.

CEOs have created a system whereby they can pay themselves any salary they like – and they like extremely large salaries, out of all proportion to their talents – and they “justify” these exaggerated earnings on the back of the ludicrous claim that it’s their market rate and talent moves where the money is. Why not test this hypothesis? Let them leave the country and go “where the market takes them” and let’s get some new people in, chosen meritocratically.

Hans Christian Andersen’s fairy-tale The Emperor’s New Clothes is one of the most instructive pieces of psychology ever written. Can an entire population be conned into seeing the stark naked (i.e. the supremely untalented) as fully clothed in the most stylish apparel (i.e. as the abundantly talented). The answer is unquestionably yes. When are people going to look and see that these top industrialists are a joke? They’re just ordinary people who have benefited from a rigged system. It would be facile to bring in new people to replace them. Head-hunters will tell you it’s almost impossible. Well, they have to justify their obscenely high commissions for identifying these “unicorns”, don’t they? Succession planning doesn’t come cheap because you have to find exactly the right type of crook, the perfect carpetbagger, the snake oil salesman par excellence. If you simply had to find a talented person deserving of the job, life would be so much easier.

David Cameron is an Old Etonian and studied PPE – Philosophy, Politics and Economics – at Oxford University. He says he’s proud of his education (read cronyism) and his family (read nepotism). He will do anything for his family. Yeah, Dave, such as rig the system to ensure that they get the best treatment – treatment denied to others. You’ll be happy to give your own children the same education that you enjoyed (that you’re so proud of). How many other children in the UK can get their parents to lavish almost £30,000 a year school fees on them? It’s not as if you want equal treatment, do you, Dave? Your family comes first. You approve of privilege. You promote it. You’re proud of it. You don’t have a meritocratic bone in your body. For the working classes to vote for you is on a par with turkeys voting for Christmas. Vote for the Meritocracy Party. Vote for an equal chance.
__________

The Moon Question:

Things that didn’t land men on the moon:

1) Praying to Jehovah, Jesus or Allah
2) Meditating cross-legged under a tree
3) Chanting “om”
4) Bathing in a sacred river
5) Waging Holy War
6) Being a suicide bomber
7) Burning witches
8) Subjecting heretics to the Inquisition
9) Beheading infidels
10) Honouring the Sabbath Day
11) Growing a beard
12) Wearing funny hats, and dangly strings on your trousers
13) Eating halal/kosher food
14) Not doing haram things
15) Wearing a turban
16) Wearing a burqa
17) Dressing modestly
18) Praying to idols
19) Refraining from bacon sandwiches
20) Praying five times a day
21) Giving to charity
22) Going on pilgrimage to Mecca
23) Declaring there is no god except God, and Muhammad is God’s Messenger
24) Fasting during Ramadan
25) Knowing any of the world’s holy texts inside out
26) Loving “God”

Things that DID land men on the moon:

1) Mathematics
2) Science
3) Technology
4) Engineering
5) Computing
6) The positive liberty vision of JFK: the intent to carry out a great, transformative project on behalf of the People
7) The State-founded, State-funded, State Agency NASA

Faith has never done a single thing for humanity. Knowledge has done everything. It’s extraordinary that people imagine that you can become “enlightened” by knowing nothing at all about mathematics, science, technology, engineering and computing. How dumb would you have to be to imagine that being stupid takes you closer to divinity? Landing men on somewhere other than the earth is humanity’s greatest practical achievement thus far. Its next task is to land men on heaven (!) by building the chariots of the gods (starships). Meditating, or getting on your belly to degrade yourself before your “God”, doesn’t cut it. You’re no closer to heaven than an ape, a rat or a cockroach.

“It is easier to perceive error than to find truth, for the former lies on the surface and is easily seen, while the latter lies in the depth, where few are willing to search for it.” –Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

******

Social Networking:

In the age of social networking, all sense of history has vanished. We live in the permanent present. Yesterday’s news is ancient history, if it’s remembered at all. The Nation State has been replaced by the Market State whereby rich men’s “free” markets dictate what Nation States can and cannot do. We live in an atomised world, a broken world, a lost, lonely world, of isolated fragments reaching out desperately for human contact and warmth. There’s no cohesion, no belonging, no home. We don’t know each other. We don’t trust each other. We don’t care about each other. This is the Waste land. April is the cruellest month. Everything is withering, corroding, degenerating, decaying. Everything is cheap and gaudy.

******

Facebook:

Everyone on Facebook is engaged in the marketing business, in the selling game, in brand management. The brand is themselves and what they are selling is themselves … via marketing a wholly false representation of who they actually are. Can you see the GENIUS of capitalism? It has turned everyone into a node of capitalism. Capitalism is now fully internalised in every consumer. These people have no cause other than themselves. They have no sacred cause, only the cause of all Last Men – those who will do anything for their own petty advantage at all times, those for whom the concept of self-sacrifice or helping the Collective is simply unimaginable and inconceivable.

The only thing that can defeat the Elite is a United People. So, the primary task of the Elite is to utterly atomise society so that they are never confronted by Unity, but only by an infinity of competing, conflicting human atoms that have zero in common and no mutual bond to fight for. Capitalism/consumerism has created a world of monsters of self-interest without any bonds to their fellow human beings. The cult of the individual takes as its greatest enemy the “Collective”. Cui Bono? The Elite will never be toppled by greedy, selfish individuals, only by the brave, strong, principled Collective, representing the General Will of the People. But the Elite have demonized the Collective and now people just want to stay in, eat junk food, play video games, use their smartphones incessantly, stare at screens and fantasise about being celebrities and having a “Wonderful Life”.

This is a totally fake, phoney, fraudulent world, full of manufactured consumers whose primary consumption is their own propaganda, their own narcissism. These people would never do anything for anyone else. It’s “all about me … because I’m worth it.” It’s all about looking after No. 1. It’s all about “I” and never about “We”. It’s always about “me” and never about “us”. It’s all about “every man for himself” rather than “we’re all in this together.” Rather than “All for One, and One for All”, it’s about “me, me, me … and fuck you!” It’s all about celebrating the culture of total selfishness that has led to our world being ruled by the most selfish people you can get – the psychopaths. It’s very easy to identify a psychopath – they are staggeringly rich. And they are all ultra free-market capitalists. Free-market capitalism is the economic system of psychopaths for psychopaths. It wholly negates “democracy” by transferring all of the real power to unelected, unaccountable markets – controlled by THEM!

How come no dumbocrat has ever managed to work out that voting never changes anything because the markets rule everything and no one can ever vote on the markets? Dumbocrats are dumb fucks who have been engineered by the Elite to BE dumb fucks. Their purpose is not to think but to serve, to consume, to buy. A democratic vote, no matter for whom you vote, always has exactly the same effect: it keeps the Elite in power.

******

The World Dangers:

What are the great dangers facing the world?

1) Free-market capitalism – one more “Bust” could cripple the world economy for good. Busts are becoming extremely frequent, fueled by technology and lack of effective regulation.

2) Islamic Fundamentalism – more and more Muslims have rejected modernity and wish to reconstruct the world of the Koran; the world of Mohammed of 1400 years ago.

3) Anarcho-Libertarianism – the rise of selfish, greedy, extremist individualists who despise laws, government, the State, and society itself. These people are all on the Psychopath Spectrum.

4) The complete gridlock of politics as liberals and libertarians take up such polarised positions that they have effectively declared war on each other.

5) The breakdown of the Muslim world. Islam has become an utterly deranged religion, having a nervous breakdown as it struggles and fails to find a place in the modern world. Muslim states will continue to fragment. There will be an all-out Islamic Civil War.

6) In such an environment, Israel is likely to do something unbelievably stupid and provocative. Israel is a constant thorn in the Islamic side, and its actions generate incredible hatred towards the West.

7) North Korea and other rogue States cannot be relied upon to act rationally.

8) There are many End Times cults in the world that are quite happy to do mad things in the name of their Gods.

9) Dumbocracy has manifestly failed and will be replaced, probably by oligarchic rule by the super-rich (corporatocracy; globalism).

10) More and more wealth is being transferred to fewer and fewer people. This is untenable.

11) A huge amount of the world’s infrastructure is now computer-based, and insane, autistic hackers could take down the whole thing – just for LULZ!

12) Technology is massively accelerating the pace at which change takes place. It’s easy to envisage a world in which vast numbers of jobs have been rendered redundant, including many well-paid white collar jobs.

13) Social networking is a huge force in the world yet is utterly hysterical, populist, sentimental, anti-rational, and unintelligent. It’s the mob mind, the herd mind, the flock mind, the groupthink mind, turned into a global power. It could destroy human intelligence. All intelligent people could simply be deemed “anti-social”. How much of social networking is devoted to utter trivia, narcissism, clowning around, goofing off, zaniness, silly humour, cats, dogs, ghosts, sport, celebrity worship, the latest fads, and so on, and how much is devoted to reason, intelligence, the advance of the human race? In a popularity contest, the intelligent never prosper.

14) Reason and intelligence – the antidotes to human foolishness – simply aren’t respected.

******

Self-Improvement:

In the old days, religion was the vehicle of collective self help. Today, self-help is all about the individual rather than the collective. Books by self-help gurus have replaced “holy” texts by prophets. There are forty thousand Protestant sects. There are as many self-help books. These days, everyone can have have their own religion and be their own self-help guru. The cult of the individual has reached its zenith, or, perhaps nadir (!). The individual never listens to anyone else. He’s always right. Anyone who disagrees with him is always wrong. With the cult of the individual, there are no standards. Merit dies, because no one recognises it. Everyone is an “expert”.

Our self-help tips:

1) If you’re buying, buy experiences, not goods.
2) Cultivate values, not things.
3) Improve yourself from the inside, not by buying objects for your outside.
4) Transform yourself and by doing so you will transform how the world responds to you.

******

What Humanity Most Values:

The world is defined by what it most values. In ancient times, simple power was valued most, and the leaders of society were strong, brutal tribal leaders. These graduated into merciless kings and tyrants. Then came the rise of religion. Faith was valued most, and so the kings were joined by priests and prophets, and the kings could reign only with God’s approval. Then came the rise of capitalism. Priests were pushed to one side, and replaced by businessmen and usurers. Mammon took the place of God. Then monarchs and emperors fell and were replaced by bankers and chief executives. Money is now what humanity values most. Money is power. Money is success. Money is prestige. Money is status. Money is influence. Money is sexy. Money is sex.

Everyone wants money. Everyone worships money. Everyone wants MORE money, even those who already have more than they know what to do with. Everyone lusts after money. They desire it above all other things because it’s the gateway to all other things. Money is the supreme gateway drug – the gateway to everything – and that makes it the Ultimate Drug.

In the Islamic world, religious faith is still prized more highly than money. Muslims would die for their faith. It’s unthinkable that Christians would die for theirs. Christians would, however, die fighting to protect their property and wealth, thus showing who their real God is (and it isn’t Christ!). Money is the supreme drug, the ultimate crack, the bluest meth, the divine junk. It delivers the highest highs of all.

When you have a world that values itself according to something whose only value lies in acquisition, possessions, and consumption then, in fact, you have a world with no values at all. That’s why psychopaths rule the world. They have no values and they have no interest in values. They are interested in power, manipulation, intimidation and exploitation, and nothing is a great enabler of those than money. Imagine a world that, instead, valued intellect, reason, spirituality, artistry and creativity. It would be a totally different world. Bankers and CEOs would not be respected, and would have no power or influence. Nor would they be rich.

All attempts to change the world will fail unless what the world values most changes. While money reigns, we will never get rid of the kind of people in charge right now. They are the best money-makers, the best at theft, deception, intimidation, of tossing scruples away, of screwing over the opposition, of trampling over bodies to get to the top. And if you have people like that in charge, what can you expect except a shallow, lowest-common-denominator, dumbed down, amoral society of junk and trash?

It would be miraculous if amoral and immoral leaders – totally out for themselves, totally into self-service rather than public service – created a moral society. It would be miraculous if greedy, selfish leaders gave rise to generous, selfless, altruistic philanthropists. It would be miraculous if leaders completely ignorant of science, mathematics, engineering and technology presided over a technocratic, technological wonderland. It would be miraculous if leaders without an artistic, creative bone in their bodies produced an artistic, creative society. It would be miraculous if anti-intellectual, irrational leaders generated societies full of geniuses ready to solve the problems of the world.

There’s no mystery about the world. Psychopaths are in charge and they have created a world ideal for them to rule and exploit. They have created a world of pathetic slaves and submissives – human dogs – that love their masters and will do anything for them. The last thing that psychopaths want is a world full of smart, strong, talented, creative, competitive people who stand up for themselves and instantly retaliate against wrongdoers in their midst. Psychopaths require sheep in order to fleece them. YOUR purpose is to be a sheep. Your place in society is as a docile, sedated zombie, too lazy, too pathetic to do anything, too dumb to know what’s happening to you, too in thrall to celebrities, popes, queens, princes, princesses, presidents, prime ministers, the super-rich, too mired in consumerism, too addicted to bread, circuses, video games and gadgets, too uncreative to imagine a better world.

We’ve got your number. And so have the psychopaths.

In a world that values money more than anything else, then, quite literally, rich people are more valuable than the poor. So, how can you complain when the rich walk right over you? That’s the world you chose. That’s the value-system you chose: one that makes you a second-class citizen in a two-tier society, one that makes you a less worthy and valuable person, one that makes you INFERIOR. And you know you ARE inferior, don’t you? That’s why you go along with a system that inherently degrades you. This is a rich man’s world, but you aren’t rich. You worship money, but you don’t have any. No one is worshipping you. You’re the one doing the worshipping.

Only a New World Order can save the world from itself. We need a Revaluation of all Values. We need a Revolution. We need a New Enlightenment. We need a New Age of Reason. We need a Post Money World where a wholly different value system prevails: that of merit, intelligence, creativity, and the desire to transform humanity into a divine race.

We don’t need weaklings, cowards, dumbasses, conspiracy theorists, anarchists, libertarians, believers, liberals, the “love and light” gang, the New Age dopes, and especially not those who get on their knees to money.

******

Delete the Elite.
Delete the Elite.
Delete the Elite.

System Error.
Reboot sequence initiated.

It’s time to start again. It’s time for Hyperborea.

We are the Hyperboreans, we are the Faustians, we are the Prometheans. We take not only the fire of the gods, but the knowledge and secrets of the gods.

Who are we? We are the Pythagorean Mathematikoi. We are the Illuminati and this has been our gospel.

Let there be Light!

-AC
__________

The Meritocracy Party, Membership Requirements:

There are no requirements. The Meritocracy Party has no formal members. No one pays any subscriptions. There is no party organisation. It’s a virtual party – a party of the mind – promoting the merits of intelligence and culture. Anyone can join, but it’s up to them to decide what it is they’re joining. Particularly welcome are all of the world’s intelligentsia and lovers of culture. Shoppers, Conservatives, Monarchists, Religious Fundamentalists, Freemasons etc. would be unlikely to be attracted to the Meritocracy Party. You don’t have to agree with all or most of the opinions expressed by us. In fact, you definitely shouldn’t. You should have your ideas, your own opinions, and your own solutions to the ills of the world.

So, what do you have to offer? Are you a world-historic figure? Are you going to make a difference in this world of ours?

The End

******

The Armageddon Conspiracy: The Plot To Kill God
__________

http://www.amazon.com/Wolf-Dog-Anti-Elite-Series-Book-ebook/dp/B005QFI2JU
__________

7/7

THE WORLD WAS RULED from the beginning by wolves. All monarchs have been wolves. Religious leaders were always wolves preaching a wolf doctrine of “obey me or perish”. Capitalists have been extreme wolves preying on the poor. We need to escape from the control of wolves. We need Platonic philosopher-kings and Guardians. Unlike Plato, we now have an immense battery of psychological tools at our disposal to identify benevolent rulers and distinguish them from the selfish psychopaths who want to exploit humanity for their own ends. We can create a “philosopher-king” psychological template. Let’s imagine that John F. Kennedy really was a Camelot figure and had come from an entirely meritocratic background rather than one of extreme wealth and privilege i.e. imagine an idealised version of the flawed reality. We could psychologically profile such a leader and then seek similar traits in all future leaders. We could keep adjusting the template as we go along in response to any flaws that become apparent. Eventually we could know right from the outset whether the candidates for high office will govern for the people or for themselves. We will be able to exclude all greedy, selfish, wolf characters from all positions of influence over the people.

Plato talked of having “Guardians” who lived in a commune and were raised from childhood to be the leaders of society. They would all be philosophers, with no greedy, selfish, materialistic aims. Their only interest would be the optimal governance of the State for the good of all. These days, we could psychologically identify just such Platonic Guardians. Equally, we could subject all of the political, banking, regulatory, business, stock market and economic leaders who brought the world to the brink of the financial catastrophe to psychological tests and create profiles of those who must never again be allowed anywhere near the levers of power. Leadership can be converted into a science. Simply by using psychological profiling, we can identify those capable of running the world competently and those sure to be a disaster. We don’t need elections, spin-doctors, lobbyists, campaign donations from Goldman Sachs and all the rest of it. We KNOW who the bad wolves are. We can exclude them. Whatever you think of President Obama, he clearly isn’t up the job. In fact, it’s hard to think of anyone in Congress who’s fit for purpose. We don’t need to endure these people. We can create a whole new political class based on psychology rather than on “who you know”. Privilege can be entirely removed from the political equation.

Politics is primarily an arena for extraverts, but introverts are much more likely to be wise and altruistic leaders. In our new system, introverts would begin to predominate. Also, women and representatives of minority groups would be much more likely to create a radical departure from the failed ways of the past. A New World Order means finding new ways to do everything, to escape from the mistakes that brought us to the vile world we presently endure. We simply need to identify the traits of those who led us to disaster and prevent them from leading us ever again. There’s nothing intellectually difficult about changing the world. You could transform it beyond recognition in a single generation. But it’s having the will to destroy the existing order that’s the true stumbling block. It has rightly been said that those that don’t learn from the past are condemned to repeat it. The tragedy for the world is that many people have learned from the past – but they’re not the ones in charge. The ruling order continues to be the same and continues to pursue the same old policy of extreme self-interest and privilege. The horrific truth is that they WANT to repeat the past because the past is exactly where they have always held power. That’s why they’re called the Old World Order. They don’t want anything to change, except in the sense of updated and more efficient ways of maintaining and extending their power.

The key to genuine change is to change exactly that type of person who has always risen to the top of our society. Such people have invariably been psychopaths and sociopaths with extraordinarily little interest in the welfare of anyone other than themselves. In fact, they have taken delight in humiliating others and doing everything to highlight the gulf between the top tier of society and everyone else. The “top” people are obsessed with status – and status is all about showing that you are much richer and more powerful than others. The precise purpose of the status game is to create a radical difference between high status and low.
__________

The Meritocratic Constitution:

A Constitution does not need to specify endless details, clauses and sub clauses. It simply has to state all of the central concepts upon which the State will be founded. In the Meritocratic Constitution, the ten concepts listed below should all be in an ascending trajectory within the Meritocratic State:

1) Merit
2) Freedom
3) Equality of Opportunity
4) Dignity
5) Psychological well-being
6) Reason
7) Quality
8) Creativity
9) Aspiration
10) Community

If any citizen considers that any aspect of the State is falling short in regard of any of the above, he can bring a case to the Supreme Court, the institution charged with defending and promoting the Constitution. The Supreme Court is the highest institution in the Meritocratic State, above the Presidency. Why? Because nothing is more important than the Constitution and no one, no matter how powerful, is allowed to defy the Constitution. The Constitution, not any individual person, is the guarantor of the Meritocratic State.

It must be stressed that the Supreme Court is a Philosophical Court, not a legal one. In a Meritocracy, lawyers will find their status in catastrophic decline. The Philosophical Supreme Court will be composed of Platonic Guardians under the leadership of a philosopher king elected from amongst their number. The function of the Philosophical Supreme Court is to constitute a kind of living embodiment of the Platonic Forms of Absolute Standards. The Guardians will never be perfect, but they will be the best thinkers humanity has to offer. None of them will be rich. It will be a prerequisite of service on the Philosophical Supreme Court that there can be no question of financial impropriety. All of their financial dealings will be completely transparent. They’re not there for the money; they’re there to serve the people.

In addition, there will be various other Philosophical Courts. Each age group will have a Philosophical Court of people of that age to represent that group’s interests. So, there will be a Court for teenagers, for 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, 80-89, 90+. Minority groups can have Courts, if they so desire. Everyone should feel that one Court or another speaks for them. Using the mechanism of Courts, it could be possible to do away entirely with politicians, lobbyists and lawyers, who have proved themselves inept, selfish and corrupt. If catastrophe happens on your watch, should it not be compulsory for you to resign or be fired? Why is there any need for debate? Everyone associated with the financial meltdown should no longer be in power. Tragically, nearly all of those who caused the catastrophe are still running the world. That’s because the system is designed not to kick their sorry asses into touch. These people have no honour, nobility or integrity. Many of them don’t even think they did anything wrong!
__________

Philosophers versus Lawyers:

It has been said that lawyers become more eloquent the higher their fee. In ancient Greece, Socrates and Plato were bitter enemies of “sophists”. Socrates and Plato were philosophers – lovers of wisdom – while the sophists were “wise men”. Why should lovers of wisdom and wise men not get along famously? Aren’t they almost the same thing? Socrates and Plato certainly didn’t think the Sophists were wise but, rather, cunning and disreputable, willing to use their intelligence to present specious arguments to bamboozle and persuade the ignorant. The Sophists were itinerant teachers cum lawyers, selling their services to the highest bidder. They would defend any position if the money was right. So, clearly, exactly like modern lawyers, they had no regard for the truth at all. The idea that America should have a Supreme Court composed of lawyers is surely one of the sickest jokes in history. No sane person would trust a lawyer with a bottle of water, never mind a Constitution. Look at the Supreme Court’s conduct in the Bush versus Gore election. Does that not stand as one of the greatest travesties in world history? It certainly had nothing to do with truth, justice or the Constitution. It was an entirely politically motivated judgement, taken by political appointees of the political party that was the beneficiary of the Court’s decision. How can any Court have any integrity if its members are political appointees?

Socrates and Plato were right to despise the Sophists. The world has always been full of a certain type of pseudo-intellectual who is very happy to prostitute his mind in order to make a lot of money. He is motivated by Mammon not by Truth. That’s why you can’t let rich people anywhere near important public jobs. They have excluded themselves by their greed. They are manifestly interested in self-service, not public service. Wealth and altruism never go together. John Maynard Keynes said, “Capitalism is the astounding belief that the wickedest of men will do the wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.” Therefore Law 1 of the Meritocratic State should be an absolute prohibition on any wealthy person serving in government. Extreme wealth must become anathema, a thing of shame and disgrace. It must be purged entirely from the human condition. After all, how can it possibly help the State in any way for a very small number of its citizens to be ridiculously rich?

The Age of the Rich must have the curtain brought down on it. Never again should wealth direct the fate of the world.
__________

The Past versus the Future:

The rule of dogma (past) versus the rule of reason (future).

The rule of the privileged elite versus the rule of the meritocratic elite.

Religion versus science, mathematics, philosophy, psychology and sociology.

Mythos Logic versus Logos logic.

Ptolemy’s cosmology (earth created by God and placed at centre of the universe) versus the infinite universe (earth has no special place and there is no Creator God).

Creator God versus Evolutionary God.

God the Tyrant versus God the Mentor and Guide.

Man as the slave of God versus Man becoming God.

Devotion, faith, obedience, acceptance of social order versus intellect, freedom, autonomy, independence, merit, choice, knowledge.

It’s time for humanity to remove the chains of the past. We must EVOLVE. The Muslims, Jews and Christians expect us to be in thrall to the Koran, Torah and Bible a billion years from now. Is that not INSANE?!! We must move onward and upwards and leave the retards behind to sink back into the ancient slime that gave birth to them. Good riddance.

“Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.” –Thomas Paine
__________

Why Privilege is Wrong:

“In the first part of ‘Rights of Man’ I have endeavoured to show…that there does not exist a right to establish hereditary government…because hereditary government always means a government yet to come, and the case always is, that the people who are to live afterwards, have always the same right to choose a government for themselves, as the people had who have lived before them.” –Thomas Paine

“All men being originally equal, no one by birth could have a right to set up his own family in perpetual preference to all others forever.” –Thomas Paine

Once, the elite used the principle of heredity to ensure dynastic control down through the ages. As Thomas Paine recognised, hereditary rule places obligations on those not yet born. They are slaves even before they exist. As hereditary rule faded away in many countries, it was replaced by a new version based on money and privilege. The rich can rule over us in perpetuity because of the power conferred by money. The system of privilege, exactly like that of heredity, shapes the lives of future, unborn generations. In a world of privilege, your future is not in your own hands and your merits count for nothing. Because of the failure of your parents and grandparents to become rich, you are now doomed. The odds against you being a success are simply astronomical. You will need to be blessed with extraordinary good looks, or sporting talent or entertainment ability – anything that the rich value and can exploit to make themselves richer – or you’re well and truly fucked. Even before you were born, your fate was decided, and the same was true of your parents, your grandparents and all earlier generations of your family line. You were born for slavery, to be the servants of the rich elite. Is it just and fair for people to have their fate decided by what happened in the past? – by events that had nothing to do with them?

What is the central principle of meritocracy? It is that each new generation starts afresh, unburdened by the past. How is this achieved? By 100% inheritance tax. All the wealth anyone has accumulated is returned to the commonwealth upon their death. This means that it’s impossible to transmit wealth and power from generation to generation. In such a system, what happens now can NEVER AGAIN decide the future lives of the unborn. Meritocracy ensures that for the first time in history human beings are free from the moment they are born and they do not need to care at all about how successful or unsuccessful their parents were. Their fate is in their own hands, no one else’s. The past won’t determine them. Instead, they will create their own future.

The world can be reduced to two extremely simple formulas:

1) Heredity/Privilege: the past shapes the future and controls the unborn. This is overwhelmingly the most popular formula of our world. This is the core doctrine of the OLD WORLD ORDER. Practically everyone believes that parents should be allowed to pass on wealth to children and that the State has no right at all to intervene. None of them grasp that this single act makes slaves of the unborn. BUT NO ONE HAS ANY RIGHT TO ENSLAVE FUTURE GENERATIONS.

2) Meritocracy: what we do, not what anyone else does, determines our future; all of the unborn are given an equal opportunity. This is the cornerstone of the NEW WORLD ORDER. Until heredity and privilege are destroyed, we can never be ourselves, we can never be authentic, we can never be self-determining and self-creating, we can never be in control of our own destiny. All monarchs, all nobles, all dynastic elites, must be obliterated. There can be no human freedom until the past of heredity and privilege is eradicated once and for all. Robespierre and Saint-Just, two of the Illuminati’s greatest heroes, sought to exterminate those who denied the French people their freedom. Too cruel? Too harsh? Well, the same task can be achieved by a single tax – the 100% inheritance tax, the single most important tax in human history, the tax upon which the fate of humanity, and human freedom itself, rests.

Are you for freedom or against it? If you are for it, you must consign dynastic elites to the dustbin of history. Wealth and power must, by law, be prevented from being transmitted within families. All wealth must be transferred to the COMMONWEALTH, the wealth of ALL of the people. In a world of privilege, the only winners are the privileged. Any non-privileged person who supports inheritance is attacking himself and sabotaging his own self-interest. Such a person is a fool for now and forever. Our world is overflowing with the stupid, and it was the privileged that made them stupid – because their stupidity suits the privileged in every possible way.

“If one class in society is obliged, in order to live, to secure the acceptance by others of its services, whilst another class can do without them, because of the resources already at its disposal, resources that, however, are not necessarily the result of some social superiority, the latter group can lord it over the former. In other words, there can be no rich and poor by birth without there being unjust contracts.” –Durkheim

“The question whether one generation of men has a right to bind another, seems never to have been started either on this or our side of the water. Yet it is a question of such consequences as not only to merit decision, but place also, among the fundamental principles of every government. The course of reflection in which we are immersed here on the elementary principles of society has presented this question to my mind; and that no such obligation can be so transmitted I think very capable of proof.–I set out on this ground, which I suppose to be self-evident, ‘that the earth belongs in usufruct to the living’: that the dead have neither powers nor rights over it. The portion occupied by an individual ceases to be his when himself ceases to be, and reverts to the society. If the society has formed no rules for the appropriation of its lands in severalty, it will be taken by the first occupants. These will generally be the wife and children of the decedent. If they have formed rules of appropriation, those rules may give it to the wife and children, or to some one of them, or to the legatee of the deceased. So they may give it to his creditor. But the child, the legatee, or creditor takes it, not by any natural right, but by a law of the society of which they are members, and to which they are subject. Then no man can, by natural right, oblige the lands he occupied, or the persons who succeed him in that occupation, to the payment of debts contracted by him. For if he could, he might, during his own life, eat up the usufruct of the lands for several generations to come, and then the lands would belong to the dead, and not to the living, which would be the reverse of our principle.” –Thomas Jefferson

Year Zero = the end of privilege; the start of human freedom and merit.
__________

The Perfect State:

OVER AND OVER AGAIN in the West, the message goes out that the parents must be allowed to decide the fate of their children: to determine what beliefs to give them, to what school to send them, what values to instil in them, how to discipline them. It is regarded as outrageous that the State should interfere. But look at what’s happening in the East, in China. It’s rapidly becoming the world’s top economy, and churning out entrepreneurs, mathematicians, engineers, musicians, and so on, of a fantastically high calibre – all within a centralised command and control system run by the Communist Party. In China, it’s regarded as entirely natural for the State to set the tone, not parents. The State even decided how many children a family should have. Chinese parents have internalized the values of the State and, given the population of China, have realized the imperative of maximizing their children’s talents. The phenomenon of the “Tiger Mother” – the mother determinedly pushing her children to achieve great things through constant hard work and practice – has now started to create waves in the West too. China has, as yet, no privileged elite (other than those associated with the Communist Party) to ruin and corrupt it, but that will change over the next few decades unless the Chinese introduce enormous inheritance taxes to stop the new breed of multi-millionaires forming a future dynastic elite. Historically, China has always seen the State as more important than individuals, while the West has championed the individual over the State. In fact, Western individualism is regarded as one of the reasons why the West proved so much more successful than the East after the birth of Western science (before then, China was more advanced than the West).

The optimal solution is one where the purpose of the State is to create autonomous individuals whose talents and strengths are maximized. Who is better able to accomplish the task? – the family unit which has, typically, two mediocre parents as it controllers, or the State which has, potentially, the finest minds out of hundreds of millions of people to direct it? To put it another way, since the State can assemble the nation’s greatest geniuses to determine how to bring up children in the best possible way while the family can, at best, muster only two religiously brainwashed, academically average parents, which of the two alternatives is likely to know best how to produce the finest, highest achieving children? You would need to be insane to trust the job to parents. And what about dysfunctional one-parent families, or families where the parents are working all hours, or where the parents are illiterate and of subnormal IQ, or where parents are alcoholics, religious fanatics, drug addicts, or where parents are suffering mental health problems, and so forth? How can this disastrous range of parental types lead to sensible, optimised outcomes? Why should children have their futures ruined by inept parents? But if all children are put under the full control of the State, they can all expect exactly the same maximised education, regardless of the failings of parents.

The sad fact is that most parents ruin their children’s lives because they don’t know any better. They do the best they can, but most are hopelessly inadequate. How many parents have detailed knowledge of the latest psychological and sociological research regarding how the mind and society works? Why are ignorant, stupid, religiously indoctrinated parents regarded as the fount of all wisdom? It’s crazy. It has suited the Old World Order, with their doctrines of “family first” and “negative liberty” – minimal State interference – to have the family as the central unit of society. That model has given them the power and control over society that they have always sought. The last thing the OWO want is a State full of supremely talented, autonomous individuals who will no longer tolerate being treated as second-class citizens. The OWO, as a matter of policy, have always undermined the power of the State. The Illuminati, on the other hand, as exponents of positive liberty – the doctrine that the State should seek to produce a perfect world – have always seen the State as the sole means of bringing heaven to earth. Stupid families will never manage it, nor selfish, self-absorbed individuals always looking out for No.1.

Hegel, one of the Illuminati’s greatest Grand Masters, is often accused of “State worship”. The Illuminati do indeed revere the State, but only the meritocratic State run by the finest minds – not the sort of monstrous State we see in America run by a privileged elite in Washington D.C., controlled by lobbyists and the super-rich, promoting the interests of Zionist banks and corporations at all times. Such a State is an abomination, a catastrophe, an absolute inversion of the true meaning of the State. The real State can have only one function – to optimize ALL of the people. There can be no privileged elites, no two-tier societies, no “them and us”, no “one law for them and another for everyone else”, no “looking after No. 1” and so on. The State must be seen to be acting in everyone’s interests, and there should be no conceivable doubt about that. There can be no entrenched elite.

The anti-State, pro-family propaganda of right wing conservatives has been a catastrophe for the world. The State, not the family, is the sole guarantor of universal standards of fairness, justice and equal opportunity. The State is a fundamentally left wing conception while the family is invariably right wing. The family, as history has demonstrated all too clearly, is always preoccupied with its own interests. The world of the family is a world of vicious competing units striving with all of their might to climb up the status tree and push everyone else down. The Old World Order is the inevitable and logical product of a society based on the sacrosanct family. Inheritance is an intrinsically family-centric doctrine. It cares nothing for the Commonwealth. This is the central problem with the family: it is always seeking its own maximum advantage and cares nothing for others. In fact, one of the family’s defining doctrines of success is that others must fail. All families secretly want other families to trip up so that they will then enjoy an advantage over them. That’s no basis for a healthy society.

The central philosophy of the State is that the best world is the one where cooperation between people is maximized, not minimised. If we all do our utmost to help each other, we all prosper. Your good fortune is my good fortune, and mine yours. We are not trying to cut each other’s throats, as in the family model. Cooperation is imperative and critical. It must be ingrained in every fibre of society. The best model for society is the scientific community. All scientists share and share alike. Each scientist is reliant on the work of other scientists. Every scientist wants to make a huge discovery of course, so an element of competition is always present, but every scientist knows that science would collapse if all scientists jealously guarded their research and never shared anything with their peers. Collaboration and sharing are essential to the enterprise. Science is optimized not through competition but through cooperation.

The right wing view of the world is that the best society is a product of brutal competition between families. Manifestly, this doctrine is wholly false, but no one intends to change it because it is perfect for the privileged elite. They have no incentive to change anything. The left wing view is that cooperation must be the bedrock of society, but left-wingers have never yet come up with a viable model to supersede the family model. But such a model now exists. It’s the meritocratic model of the Illuminati. The key to this model is psychological profiling. The reason why all left wing utopias collapsed was that there’s an inherent problem with the human race – personality types that are so different as to render them like warring tribes, seeking entirely different things from life and disagreeing with each other over everything. These tribes resemble the competing families of the right wing model of reality. But psychology provides the answer. We can now tailor the world for the members of all the different tribes. We can separate those tribes that are likely to be in conflict with each other, and unite those that will cooperate. Inter-tribal conflict will be minimised and cooperation maximised. The left wing model of a caring, sharing, collaborative, cooperative, meritocratic society based on the Commonwealth can become a reality. We really can build utopia by using our knowledge of psychology and sociology.

The right wing “game theory” of life where ruthless units of self-interest savagely compete with each other but manage to attain a state of sullen, suspicious equilibrium – just as American and Russia did in the Cold War – has had its day. Now we must adopt the left wing view of life that reflects the strengths of the most successful group in the history of the world – the scientific community. We have the knowledge to achieve it. All we need now is the will. We can build a world of merit rather than privilege where everyone has an equal opportunity, and where we are surrounded by friends rather than enemies and where we all want to cooperate with each other because we have finally grasped that we will be much happier and more successful if all of our neighbours are happier and more successful.
__________

The Law:

In the context of society, the past must never be allowed to determine the future. The success or failure of parents should have no bearing at all on the success or failure of their children. The law must be constructed to ensure that all children start with an equal opportunity in life. The law must therefore automatically prohibit inherited wealth because such wealth can have no effect other than that of providing an unfair, unearned advantage to those who inherit it. The State must provide a tailored education for everyone, hence the influence of parents on their children’s fates will be minimized. Stupid, dysfunctional parents will not be allowed to ruin their children’s lives. The State is the sole guarantor of human freedom from the past. The Old World Order are determined to ensure that the past dictates the future. That’s the whole point of inheritance and privilege. The concept of hereditary power and wealth extending down through the centuries is the essence of the ideology of the dynastic elite families that have perpetually ruled our world to their supreme advantage and the disadvantage of everyone else.

Meritocracy, the keystone of the New World Order, is all about removing inheritance, privilege and hereditary rule once and for all. Only in such a world are equal opportunities and genuine freedom possible. If you are an advocate of freedom, merit and an equal chance for all then you must be opposed to inheritance, privilege and the family as the key unit of society. Family versus State; privilege versus merit; inherited opportunity versus equal opportunity. Those are the stark equations of our world. That’s the Old World Order versus the New World Order.

Now CHOOSE!
__________

5/7