Vă invit să vă alăturaţi grupului Facebook Mişcarea DACIA, ce-şi propune un alt fel de a face politică!Citiţi partea introductivă şi proiectul de Program, iar dacă vă place, veniţi cu noi !
O puteţi face clicând alături imaginea, sau acest link
Archive for the ‘Senza categoria’ Category:
Interreflections – 2020
Tags: The Zeitgeist Movement
Hyperian History Of The World (19th Century, Part 1)
Hyperian History Of The World (19th Century, Part 1)
After the tumultuous events of the end of the 18th century, the old powers of the church and the European monarchies were forever diminished. Nonetheless, these old powers were still very much in control, just no longer in such an overt and obvious way. The French Revolution had failed, yet it had a tremendous effect on the world. Napoleon attempted to spread revolutionary ideals around Europe, yet proclaimed himself as Emperor and became a new form of tyranny. The old powers quickly seized on this new tyranny and presented themselves as heroic liberators in their war against Napoleon. Eventually, Napoleon was brought down and the old powers restored, albeit in a diluted way.
Following these events, the world was beginning to feel very much more modern. Science was progressing and spreading, well on its way to replacing religion as the dominant influence on the thought of ordinary people, and the industrial revolution saw the massive spread of new technologies across the world.
If science and engineering were growing, philosophy, on the other hand, was waning. The industrial revolution was creating lots of wealth and was driven by science and engineering. As such, these disciplines grew. Philosophy, by comparison, began to seem old fashioned and without any real purpose, merely an academic curiosity. People no longer seemed to care about understanding the true nature of their existence, preferring rather to merely indulge in the petty pleasures of a purposeless existence.
Nonetheless, in Germany in the 19th century, there were still a number of great philosophers. In the previous century, Immanuel Kant had produced a philosophical system which separated the universe into the noumenal and the phenomenal, the former being the true reality and the latter being the way in which we experience it. This was a new kind of dualism which concluded by saying that we can never have any knowledge of the true reality of existence. This idea seemed to kill off idealism and pave the way for the dominance of materialism which we see today. However, there was one philosopher who resisted, and in fact took idealism to its most extreme, to absolute idealism, the great Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.
Hegel refused to accept that we can never know the true reality of the universe. Hegel saw that, if the universe is nothing but minds, then there is nothing which minds cannot know. Yet we are, for the most part, currently in a state of ignorance about the true nature of our reality. Hegel realised that the universe was one of a constant evolution towards complete knowledge of reality. We are currently alienated from the truth of existence, and all the things we don’t yet understand thus appear foreign and ‘other’ to us. Yet, as we progress, we slowly come to understand and have complete knowledge of the full content of our minds.
To explain the evolution of our minds, Hegel went back to the ideas of Heraclitus. Heraclitus had said that the universe changes due to the conflict and resolution of opposite forces. Hegel took this idea and added to it greater philosophical rigour and formed it into the idea known as the dialectic. The dialectic works as follows. Everything that exists, every idea we can have, can be called a thesis. The existence of a thesis automatically requires the existence of the idea which is the very opposite of the thesis, the antithesis. Things are defined by what they are not, therefore nothing can exist without the thing that it is not (its opposite) also existing. The thesis and the antithesis interact and conflict arises. This conflict is eventually resolved by a new thing arising out of the conflict, the synthesis, which takes what is good from both the thesis and the antithesis. This higher synthesis then becomes a new thesis, the existence of which requires the existence of its antithesis causing conflict and resolution into a new, higher synthesis, which becomes a new thesis etc.
This dialectical progression occurs everywhere in the universe to everything in the universe. This is how minds evolve towards their perfect state. Hegel backed up this idea by providing a philosophical reason why this should occur. Hegel defined the basic substance of the universe as Geist, meaning mind or spirit. This was equivalent to the collection of monads in the Leibnizian system, or God in Spinoza’s system. Geist originally exists in a purely unconscious state and strives to become fully conscious. By being split into infinite mids, Geist can begin to become conscious of itself, as the individual minds can reflect upon one another in order to become aware of themselves.
Thus Hegel shows that the existence of many minds is rationally necessary in order for the universe to evolve towards its final state of full consciousness of itself. The one had to become many in order for the many to all reflect upon one another and begin the process of actualising their potential and becoming perfect, a process which follows the logic of the dialectic of thesis, antithesis and synthesis.
Hegel also saw that this was not merely an internal process within our minds, yet was also manifesting itself outside in the physical world around us. The progress of the history of our society also develops in the same way, in accordance with the dialectic. The progress of society, and all of the conflict which arises, is simply a phenomenal manifestation of the internal progress within our minds. Eventually, Hegel realised, the world will arrive at a society in which every mind is free to express itself and actualise all of its potential.
Hegel had an enormous impact on subsequent philosophers, although more frequently this amounted to his philosophy being dismissed by those who failed to understand it. This is somewhat understandable however, given that, in his writings, Hegel buried his philosophy beneath layers and layers of dense academic language rendering it all but impenetrable to the average reader. Hegel retains the reputation as the most difficult to read philosopher to this day.
One subsequent philosopher inspired by Hegel would have a major impact on world events however. This was Karl Marx. Unfortunately, Marx seemed not to have a complete understanding of Hegel’s philosophy. Whereas Hegel’s system was one of dialectical idealism, Marx developed a philosophy of dialectical materialism. Hegel’s system explored the development of mind and the effects this development had on the world around us. Marx, however, ignored the minds of individuals and focused entirely on the development of society, from a materialist perspective.
Marx had witnessed the rise of capitalism following the industrial revolution. He saw how it had clearly shown the division of society into the ruling classes and the working classes, locked in an ongoing struggle. Under capitalism, the ruling classes control the means of production whilst the working class enable these means by selling their labour for wages. Using Hegel’s dialectical logic, Marx foresaw that the struggle between the classes would lead to the development of a class consciousness amongst the working class, which would see them demand more and more political power, eventually culminating in the development of a classless, communist society, in which the means of production are controlled by everyone and everyone is equal.
Marx didn’t merely describe this system, he actually called for the workers to rise up in revolution against the ruling classes in order to bring about communism sooner rather than later. This didn’t happen until the next century however, and Marx remained just a theorist. Whilst Marx’s critique of capitalism is excellent, showing exactly how it is an insidious system which benefits the rulers to the massive detriment of the workers, his alternative solution was not as well thought out. This problem derives ultimately from his materialist rejection of Hegel’s focus on the mind. The truth is that people who have lived under capitalism for so long simply aren’t psychologically ready for communism. There has to be psychological development of the people alongside the social development. Whilst communism is an ultimate end point for the social development, it cannot be enforced upon a people who are not psychologically ready for it. Events in the 20th century would show all too clearly the dangers of communism being forced upon people without the relevant psychological development.
Marx showed just how capitalism is a psychologically damaging system, yet communism, when enforced, proved to be just as damaging. To solve the problem, we simply have to return to Hegel’s dialectic. If capitalism is the thesis, and communism is the antithesis, what we require is a synthesis. Hyperianism aims to provide this synthesis. Whilst we must bring down the form of wildly unregulated capitalism which we currently have, we do not aim to completely remove capitalism as a whole. Rather, we advocate a form of state controlled capitalism in which competition is encouraged, but never allowed to get out of control, being directed at all times by logic and reason and an enlightened government. This enlightened government will actively promote a meritocratic system in which every citizen is given true equal opportunity to reach their full potential. The state will actively engage in the psychological development of each individual and, eventually, this system will have created a society of highly enlightened Hyperians. At that point, a classless society of pure equality will simply occur by itself, without having to be forced, as a natural, rational consequence of the Hyperian system.
The Principle of Sufficient Reason – PSR
The first key principle that every Illuminist should become familiar with is the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR). The PSR states that for every fact there is a reason why it is so and not otherwise. So everything must have a sufficient reason for its existence and why it is so. The PSR should be applied to any idea you come across. Test if what is being said stands up to the PSR. The video below gives a good explanation of the PSR. It may seem obvious that everything has a sufficient reason for being so, but this philosophical thinking can often be overlooked (such as in empiricist materialist science). Sometimes the given reason for the Universe’s existence is that there are random quantum fluctuations. But what is the sufficient reason for this being so and not otherwise? Does this really explain anything at all? All these problems can be looked at in far greater detail.
In short, ALL theories and ideas should pass the test of the PSR!
Tags: PSR
Hyperianism vs. The Movement
‘There are a number of you here who are intimately familiar with the work of Mike Hockney, Michael Faust, Adam Weishaupt, and the Armageddon Conspiracy site. Those of you who are know there was a movement that started ten years ago that was simply called “The Movement.” Under this movement was promoted the rational ideology of Illuminism and the political ideology called Meritocracy. It’s time for everyone to know a brief history of that, why it failed and how Hyperianism has risen from the ashes to complete what was started ten years ago.
The Movement was a 21st century incarnation of a millennia old struggle to defeat the Old World Order and liberate the divine spark within every single person thereby ushering in an age of Enlightenment. It was originally conceived of as a grass roots movement to awaken the common, working class folk to their true potential thereby removing their shackles and defeating the OWO. From the beginning, the Movement was plagued with all sorts of crazy individuals who ended up undermining the entire project. Too many people came to the movement without properly going through their own “metaphorical suicide”, destroying the ingrained brainwashing they received over the years. As a result, there were dozens and dozens of offshoot groups all purporting to be Illuminists and Meritocrats.
The Movement didn’t have unity, so as is the case with any group or movement without a central structure, it fractured and broke down, splintering off into factions all vying for power and recognition. It was hoped that there would arise within this grassroots movement a few upstanding and courageous individuals who would rise to the top and take the reins of leadership, but the exact opposite happened; The Movement was plagued by people who were all talk and who wouldn’t walk the walk. They spoke of wanting to overthrow the OWO, but never actually did anything to make that happen. Instead of getting courageous, world historic individuals, there were only legions of ignavi pretending to care.
Due to the term Illuminism being dragged through the mud by different groups, it was decided that a new approach would be taken with a brand-new name. These terms are, after all, just names and names can be changed and rewritten as our movement has done for literally thousands of years. The only way we’ve been able to survive and make any sort of impact has been by adapting. This is what we’ve done; we’ve adapted yet again, but this time, the time is ripe for a real revolution. This time, Hyperianism will be on the map as the incarnation that made it, the incarnation that actually accomplished what we’ve been longing to accomplish since the time of the ancients. We’ve learned from the past mistakes of The Movement and know now what must be done to liberate the divine spark within every individual and usher in the age of Reason. Every single one of us here is taking part in the continuation of the ever-living current of Reason. We’re all links in an age-old chain and it’s our sacred duty to make this vision a reality.
With that being said, promoting “The Movement” will only be retreading old ground. Hyperianism IS “The Movement” in all but name, except it has learned from the mistakes of the past and adapted. Simply put, The Movement died years ago and should be laid to rest. Anyone interested in continuing where it left off should be doing all they can to promote Hyperianism and #ProjectFallenStar.’
By Apollonius
DESPRE … FAMILIE
Din capul locului vom spune că MIŞCAREA DACIA are o poziţie „atipică” în legătură cu FAMILIA, la fel ca şi în toate celelalte chestiuni. Ne-am dori să nu fie astfel, dar diferenţa majoră dintre noi şi „restul lumii” este profundă şi poate fi redusă la contradicţia dintre LOGOS-ul pe care-l cultivăm noi şi MYTOS-ul care afectează pe ceilalţi. Noi ne bazăm pe CUNOAŞTERE, RAŢIUNE, iar restul pe CREDINŢE (atenţie, că şi Ştiinţa de exemplu e bântuită de Credinţe, după cum e explicat în Manifestul „Ω NOUĂ LUME – OPORTUNITĂȚI EGALE PENTRU TOȚI COPIII”)
În societatea românească, „majoritatea democratică” are o poziţie CONSERVATOARE în acest domeniu şi cine are „mintea deschisă”, va pricepe din rândurile de mai jos de ce o considerăm astfel, Expunerea aceasta este sintetică, dar suntem disponibili la detalieri pentru cei interesaţi.
FAMILIA versus INDIVID
MIŞCAREA DACIA pune pe primul loc INDIVIDUL, ci nu FAMILIA.
STATUL MERITOCRATIC ILUMINIST pe care-l avem la PRINCIPII, se va ocupa de INDIVID şi se va dezinteresa de FAMILIE aşa cum e percepută azi. Conceptul potrivit căruia „FAMILIA stă la baza societăţii” este toxic şi este impus opiniei publice de către FAMILIILE PRIVILEGIATE care îşi asigură astfel conducerea socio-economică. Acest lucru e posibil datorită instituţiei MOŞTENIRII MATERIALE. Aceasta este susţinută de conceptul de PROPRIETATE PRIVATĂ, pe care PRIVILEGIAŢII au avut mare grijă să-l introducă în Constituţii.
Asfel, Privilegiaţii (SOMEBODIES) îşi păstrează PUTEREA asupra Săracilor (NOBODIES).
FAMILIA este piatra de temelie a Vechii Ordini Mondiale (OWO).
În MERITOCRAŢIA ILUMINISTĂ proprietatea este INDIVIZĂ/OBŞTEASCĂ şi „toţi INDIVIZII au aceleaşi oportunităţi”, deci NU EXISTĂ PRIVILEGIAŢI.
Modalitatea prin care MIŞCAREA DACIA ar elimina MOŞTENIREA MATERIALĂ incompatibilă cu OPORTUNITĂŢI EGALE PENTRU TOŢI COPIII, este TAXA DE SUCCESIUNE DE 100%
FAMILIA versus STATUL PUTERNIC
MERITOCRAŢIA ILUMINISTĂ preconizează un STAT PUTERNIC, în contradicţie cu LIBERALISMUL actual ce urmăreşte exact contrariul.
Dacă ne gândim la „câte genii s-au irosit datorită lipsei de oportunităţi egale pentru toţi copiii”, tragem LOGIC concluzia că STATUL PUTERNIC nu poate fi privat de existenţa unui număr maxim de COMPETENŢI sub niciun motiv. Iată cum STATUL PUTERNIC este în contradicţie cu actualul concept de FAMILIE şi în general, cu actuala paradigmă socio-economică.
FAMILIA apără Interesul Propriu, care de cele mai multe ori nu coincide cu Interesul Comunităţii/Statului.
Statul trebuie să-şi impună autoritatea în cazul în care este împiedicat de a realiza o societate dreaptă, meritocratică. Aceasta nu poate avea succes dacă permite unor facțiuni din interiorul statului să urmărească programe distincte și opuse. În cuvintele nemuritoare ale lui J.J. Rousseau, oamenii ar trebui să fie “forțați să fie liberi“.
FAMILIA versus EDUCAŢIE
Nu este un secret, sau o derâdere, ci REALITATEA: „majoritatea familiilor sunt ignorante” din motive obiective procurate de actuala paradigmă socio-economică ce favorizează procesul. MIŞCAREA DACIA are în vedere contrariul, adică promovarea CUNOAŞTERII în aşa fel ca fiecare INDIVID să-şi poată realiza deplin Potenţialul cu care s-a născut.
În această situaţie a delega FAMILIILOR IGNORANTE procesul EDUCATIV este un nonsens cu grave consecinţe asupra COMUNITĂŢII şi asupra EVOLUŢIEI OMENIRII.
EDUCAŢIA constituie pentru MERITOCRAŢIA ILUMINISTĂ, primul şi cel mai important OBIECTIV şi va avea conotaţii total diferite faţă de actuala situaţie. De exemplu, EDUCAŢIA se va face în ŞCOLI-INTERNAT sub îndrumarea celor mai Iluminate Minţi ale Comunităţii.
Bineînţeles că FAMILIA poate oferi ceea ce Statul nu poate şi anume DRAGOSTEA PĂRINTEASCĂ.
Aceasta va avea prilejul să se manifeste de Sărbători şi în Vacanţe, prilej pentru părinţi să ia act de DEVENIREA propriilor fii şi fiice şi viceversa, deoarece părinţii vor avea timp suplimentar pentru propria DEVENIRE.
FAMILIA versus RELIGIILE MAJORE
Poziţia MIŞCĂRII DACIA în legătură cu RELIGIILE MAJORE este că „fiecare e liber să creadă ce vrea pe plan INDIVIDUAL, dar îi este interzis PROZELITISMUL de orice fel”. Cine doreşte să cunoască RELIGIILE este liber să se INFORMEZE, iar Statul se obligă să asigure celor interesaţi studierea TUTUROR RELIGIILOR şi a ISTORIEI acestora, în aşa fel ca fiecare INDIVID să-şi facă propria IDEE şi să adopte la o vârstă potrivită şi conform LIBERULUI ARBITRU, religia care i se pare mai potrivită, dacă există aşa ceva.
Astăzi sunt încălcate grosolan aceste PRINCIPII în special în FAMILIE şi în EDUCAŢIE, copiii fiind îndoctrinaţi religios înainte de a avea bazele necesare de ÎNŢELEGERE şi CUNOAŞTERE.
RELIGIILE MAJORE şi-au demonstrat toxicitatea de-a lungul mileniilor şi au fost şi sunt instrumente de bază ale actualei paradigme socio-economice.
Aşa cum familia este fundamental în contradicție cu statul, dat fiind că urmărește să pună propriile sale interese peste cele ale statului, tot aşa este şi religia. Religia își propune să promoveze propria agendă inflexibilă, care nu este cea a Statului.
Un STAT PUTERNIC nu poate admite alte REGULI şi COMPORTAMENTE în afară de cele GENERAL-VALABILE, RAŢIONALE, ŞTIINŢIFICE, bazate pe CUNOAŞTERE şi nicidecum pe CREDINŢE. Acestea se pot manifesta exclusiv pe plan INDIVIDUAL, ci nu SOCIAL. Pentru asta, averile bisericilor vor fi SECULARIZATE şi li se va interzice amestecul în Politică, Economie, Media, Educaţie şi Sănătate. Toate astea sunt apanajul exclusiv al Statului.
Căsătorie
Instituţia CĂSĂTORIEI este anacronică şi putem vedea cu ochii noştri diverşi babalâci însoţiţi de tinere voluptuoase, numai datorită BOGĂŢIEI primilor (căsătorii de convenienţă). Putem vedea mirese cumpărate, poligamia şi fetiţe „căsătorite” la vârsta pubertăţii, pentru că o RELIGIE ABRAHAMICĂ o permite (căsătorii forţate). Putem vedea căsătorii ce se menţin doar pe baza CONTRACTULUI INIŢIAL a cărui rupere ar produce diverse consecinţe materiale neplăcute. Putem vedea ABUZURI de toate tipurile ale soţilor asupra soţiilor şi invers, şamd.
Căsătoria va fi o instituție pe cale de dispariție într-o societate meritocratică. Interesul societăţii se va deplasa de la familie la individ: noua unitate funcțională a statului. Căsătoria ar deveni apoi pur și simplu un aranjament privat între indivizi. Nu ar fi recunoscut de către stat, și cu siguranță nu ar atrage privilegii fiscale sau un tratament preferențial. Statul trebuie să se definească drept o entitate populată de cetățeni, nu de cupluri și familii.
Statul are o datorie față de indivizi, și niciuna faţă de instituția căsătoriei. Statul nu poate sta deoparte și să lase familiile să crească rău copiii. Statul Meritocratic este maxim interesat de COPII, deoarece ei reprezintă EVOLUŢIA („capra sare masa, iada sare casa”).
Inclusiv chestiunea CĂSĂTORIILOR HOMOSEXUALE se rezolvă prin DISPARIŢIE, deoarece CONVIVENŢA DEVINE O CHESTIUNE PRIVATĂ, între cetăţeni, fără intervenţia Statului. Ceea ce trebuie reglementat, se reglementează prin convenţii între INDIVIZI. În condiţiile dispariţiei EREDITĂŢII şi a PROPRIETĂŢII PRIVATE, precum şi în condiţiile garantării OPORTUNITĂŢILOR EGALE, reglementările se reduc drastic, până la dispariţie. Desigur că având în vedere grija supremă a STATULUI MERITOCRATIC pentru COPII, aceştia nu vor fi la cheremul nimănui deci nici al homosexualilor, ce se vor obişnui cu gândul că nu pot procrea. Este o LEGE NATURALĂ, iar cu astea nu se discută! Sunt atâtea femei şi atâţia bărbaţi care nu procreează deşi heterosexuali, încât e superfluu a discuta chestiunea. Oricum, în SOCIETATEA MERITOCRATICĂ ILUMINISTĂ, rolul principal în EDUCAŢIA şi CREŞTEREA copiilor va reveni Statului şi Comunităţii, părinţii oferind numai ceea ce acestea nu pot oferi la acelaşi nivel: AFECŢIUNEA PĂRINTEASCĂ în primii ani de viaţă.
Chestiunea SEXUALITĂŢII INDIVIZILOR nu este relevantă pentru STATUL MERITOCRATIC, decât în măsura în care dăunează Comunităţii. CONVIVENŢII de orice fel îşi vor reglementa situaţiile conform LIBERULUI ARBITRU, orice DISCRIMINARE sau ABUZ fiind excluse.
SUPRAPOPULAŢIA este deja o PROBLEMĂ în actualele condiţii, iar STATUL MERITOCRATIC ILUMINIST nu consideră PROCREAREA ca un PRIVILEGIU, OBLIGAŢIE sau DREPT, ci ca o ATITUDINE RESPONSABILĂ bazată pe AFECŢIUNEA RECIPROCĂ dintre parteneri, dedicată PERPETUĂRII SPECIEI şi MAXIMEI EVOLUŢII a acesteia prin atingerea de către INDIVIZI a MAXIMULUI POTENŢIAL cu care s-au născut. Procrearea nu este un act ÎNTÂMPLĂTOR, VIOLENT, sau NENUMĂRAT, ci RESPONSABIL, iar atunci când nu se ţine cont de INTERESUL GENERAL, Statul trebuie să intervină.
Vor fi descurajate toate încercările de ignorare a LEGILOR NATURALE: copii în epruvetă, însămânţări artificiale, uter cu chirie, adopţii, eugenetică, şamd.
COMUNITATEA versus FAMILIE
În condiţiile dispariţiei „familiei tradiţionale” se va deschide calea COMUNITĂŢII. Nu întâmplător MIŞCAREA DACIA are la PRINCIPII ceva ce nimeni nu are: OBŞTEA. Acolo fiecare INDIVID va avea oportunităţi egale, nu vor exista privilegiaţi, nu vor exista DISCRIMINĂRI şi fiecare va fi răsplătit ETIC în funcţie de un singur criteriu: APORTUL SOCIAL… fără Excesele Liberalismului actual şi fără Egalitarismul Comunismului, ci diversificat, dar în limitele BUNULUI SIMŢ.
„Fiecare sac îşi va găsi petecul său” în total respect pentru LIBERUL ARBITRU al fiecărui component.
„Libertatea unuia se termină unde începe Libertatea celuilalt” şi Omenirea va avea deschisă calea spre o accelerată EVOLUŢIE.
„
“A person is a complex whole, having a single life; can there be a super-person, composed of persons as the body is composed of organs, and having a single life which is not the sum of the lives of the component persons? If there can be such a super-person, as HEGEL thinks, then the State may be such a being, and it may be as superior to ourselves as the whole body is to the eye.””
CONCLUZII
Deja astăzi, FAMILIA este în Criză dar din motive diverse decât cele enumerate mai sus.
Astăzi avem o Criză Materialistă, ca parte componentă a unei Disoluţii Generalizate a întregii societăţi omeneşti, care poate conduce inclusiv la EXTINCŢIA chiar şi parţială a Omenirii.
„Supravieţuirea nu este obligatorie” iar dacă nu ne vom realinia la Legile Universale bazate pe RAŢIUNE, pe MATEMATICĂ, pe DEVENIRE (BECOMING), va fi ARMAGEDDON. Pentru asta trebuie să vă decideţi cine să vă conducă Destinele: ÎNTUNECAŢII, sau ILUMINAŢII?… „MAJORITATEA DEMOCRATICĂ”, sau FILOSOFII? … ELITA INDIVIDUALIST-MATERIALISTĂ de azi, sau o ELITĂ ALTRUIST-SPIRITUALĂ?
Alegerea vă aparţine, cu CONSECINŢELE de rigoare!!!
Philip Larkin’s poem This Be The Verse
„They fuck you up, your mum and dad.
They may not mean to, but they do.
They fill you with the faults they had
And add some extra, just for you.
But they were fucked up in their turn
By fools in old-style hats and coats,
Who half the time were soppy-stern
And half at one another’s throats.
Man hands on misery to man.
It deepens like a coastal shelf.
Get out as early as you can,
And don’t have any kids yourself.”
