Dacia Iluministă

Are you for the future or against it? Do you believe that the human race is perfect? Then where is your system for bringing about perfection? Do you think democracy is the answer? Capitalism? Christianity? Are they as good as it gets? Are they our limit, as far as we can go? Can our imaginations and creativity produce nothing better? Will they be around a million years from now? The truth is they have all had their day and they have all failed. They are dinosaurs heading for well-deserved extinction. Only we have a system designed to perfect the human race – the universal dialectic. It is a process of higher and higher accomplishment, until humanity’s omega point has been attained and we are a community of gods. HyperHumanity, Omega Humanity, Humanity becoming God. Isn’t that our sacred quest?

Nietzsche said that if humanity continued on its present trajectory, it would give rise to the “Last Man”.

“Alas! The time is coming when man will give birth to no more stars. Alas! The time of the most contemptible man is coming, the man who can no longer despise himself.

“Behold! I shall show you the Last Man.

“‘What is love? What is creation? What is longing? What is a star?’ thus asks the Last Man and blinks.

“The earth has become small, and upon it hops the Last Man, who makes everything small. His race is as inexterminable as the flea; the Last Man lives longest.

“‘We have discovered happiness,’ say the Last Men and blink.”

Nietzsche obviously foresaw the rise of Shopping Mall Man. We have to find the antidote to the Last Men: HyperHumanity, Omega Humanity, Ultimate Humanity, Divine Humanity is the answer. The dialectic is the process. Ours is the path leading to perfection. Any other route is the road to nowhere. Humanity’s true nature craves that we should go on the ultimate spiritual journey, not that we should go shopping. That is our vision. We have the plan. We have the mechanism. That is why our triumph is inevitable. Eventually, all of the most talented, creative, smart and visionary people in the world will come over to our side. And then we cannot be defeated. Our victory is assured because, deep down, everyone is dissatisfied, restless, and unfulfilled. When they are presented with the opportunity to have meaningful lives, they will seize it.

Join our movement, our dialectical adventure, our mission to release humanity’s inner divinity. Make your own unique dialectical contribution. It’s time for the spiritual renaissance of the human race. We want to illuminate the cosmos with the light of humanity’s glittering, glinting, shimmering divine sparks of every conceivable bright colour. We are marching towards perfection. Reject the past. Reject the Old World Order, the old religions, the old politics, the old rules of society. It’s time to begin again. Now, finally, the way forward is fully understood – as a dialectical progression towards the Omega Point of Omega Humanity.

The time has come to revalue all values.
__________

Plutonomy:

Or the story of how a few people conquered the earth.

Plutus – the ancient Greek god of wealth, Son of Zeus, blinded by his father so that he might distribute his gifts blindly, regardless of merit.

Plutocracy – rule by the rich.

Plutonomy – an economy designed for the benefit of the rich, and powered by the rich.

Theoretical Democracy – rule of the people, by the people, for the people.

Actual Democracy – rule of the people, by the rich, for the rich.

Actual Democracy is the political system used by the rich to dupe the masses that they have a say when, in fact, all power remains in the hands of the rich. Actual democracy is nothing but cleverly disguised plutocracy. The rich knew they would never get away with ruling in their own name, so they invented a fake political system over which they had complete control but which used the mind-control mantra that the “people” were in charge. No ordinary person in history has willingly gone to war on behalf of the rich elite. It has been said that no one would ever fight in the name of capitalism. There are no martyrs for capitalism, no fiery, inspiring speeches, no people pledging to fight for it to their last breath. Who would go to the stake for the credo “Greed is good”? Capitalism never stirs the blood. It makes no contact with people’s souls. It has no heart. It’s all about the Profit Principle. It’s about private wealth and public exploitation. People would fight against capitalism, never for it.

So, capitalism cunningly rebranded itself as “Freedom and Democracy”, and those are things for which people would and do fight. Whenever you hear the rhetoric of freedom and democracy, you can be sure you are listening to the propaganda of a cabal of super-rich capitalists, manipulating you to fight on their behalf, in defence of their extortionate profits. Dumbocracy – A political system in which stupid people think they have power when, in fact, all decisions are taken by the rich. Freedumb and Dumbocracy – only the most stupid people on earth would fall for the lies of the rich. Freedom for what – to go shopping for capitalist goods? Democracy – freedom to vote for whomever the rich elite put on your ballot paper. Wake up!

Meritocracy – rule of the people, for the people, by the most talented of the people, as determined by the people. A new politics, a New World Order. The end of monarchy, privilege, and the super-rich. Hasn’t the time come? This is the age of liberation.
__________

The Citigroup Research Notes:

In his film Capitalism: a Love Story, Michael Moore refers to three Citigroup research notes to clients in the financial industry describing the concept of “plutonomy”, defined as an economy powered by the rich. These three notes reveal an astonishing amount about how the Old World Order think and act, their attitude towards ordinary people, and their grandiose, immoral plans for the future. The first note, concerning “Equity Strategy”, is entitled “Plutonomy: Buying Luxury, Explaining Global Imbalances” and is dated October 16, 2005. The authors are Ajay Kapur, Niall Macleod and Narendra Singh of Citigroup. Two of these names are Indian, and the other is Scottish. The authors claim that the world is dividing into two blocs – the plutonomies and the rest. They identify the U.S., UK, Canada and Australia as the key plutonomies. These are all linked by virtue of having once been part of the inglorious British Empire. (India, another former component of the British Empire, could easily have been added to the list.) This is no accident. Britain, a corrupt, class-ridden, anti-meritocratic, socially divided nation, was for a very long time the home of the Old World Order, and is still a pivotal player.

The Citigroup authors say, “In plutonomies the rich absorb a disproportionate chunk of the economy and have a massive impact on reported aggregate numbers like savings rates, current account deficits, consumption levels, etc. We project that the plutonomies (the U.S., UK, and Canada [and Australia]) will likely see even more income inequality, disproportionately feeding off a further rise in the profit share in their economies, capitalist-friendly governments, more technology-driven productivity, and globalisation. Since we think the plutonomy is here, is going to get stronger, its membership swelling from globalized enclaves in the emerging world, we think a ‘plutonomy basket’ of stocks should continue to do well. These toys for the wealthy have pricing power, and staying power. They are Giffen goods, more desirable and demanded the more expensive they are.”

The following inferences may be drawn:

1) the OWO intend to get even richer, to generate even greater inequality and take even more disproportionate rewards.

2) they intend to make the “democratic” puppet governments that do their bidding even more capitalist friendly (to allow even more money to be channelled towards them).

3) they will be seeking even less regulation and interference in their affairs.

4) they wish to export their plutonomic model all across the globe to create a One World Plutonomy, ruled by the super-rich.

5) they intend to profit from technology and globalisation i.e. to gain maximum penetration of their brands into world markets, while paying minimal salaries to workers. “Globalisation” is an OWO codeword for “downsizing” wages to the lowest possible level. If the Chinese work for a quarter of what Americans will work for then either a) American industry will transfer to China, or b) American workers will be forced to accept Chinese levels of pay. Either way, the OWO will make enormous amounts of money. What do they care about the low wages of the rabble? Staying “competitive” invariably means that the low paid are forced to work for even less, and that their bosses take all the money saved by cutting their wages.

6) they are eager to flaunt their wealth on extravagantly expensive “toys for the boys”, status symbols, prestige goods. They want everyone to know exactly how rich and powerful they are.

7) they have no fear of losing their enormous riches. They believe that everyone who could pose a threat to them is already bought and paid for, hence neutralized. As for “the people”, they are too stupid, too cowardly, too weak and too in awe of the rich to retaliate. They will meekly accept their fate, like cows dumbly plodding into the abattoir. The Citigroup analysts take an infantile delight in preaching their gospel of the rich. One section of their note is entitled, “Riding the Gravy Train – where are the Plutonomies?”

They say, “The U.S., UK, and Canada are world leaders in plutonomy…Countries and regions that are not plutonomies are: Scandinavia, France, Germany, other continental Europe (except Italy), and Japan.”

So, this provides a decisive answer to those Americans who think that the European Union is an OWO construct. In fact, mainland Europe is far too egalitarian for the taste of the OWO. The OWO’s hatred of the agenda of the European Union is best characterized by the UK, a ferociously OWO nation that despises any hint of increased European integration. The European Union can be criticized on the grounds of being a hopeless bureaucracy designed by corrupt, bungling and inept papershufflers, being paid far more than their meagre talents merit, but it is not an overt tool of the OWO (although the OWO are determined to change that). Italy, under the prime ministership of the dubious billionaire media tycoon Silvio Berlusconi, and with the gangsters of the Mafia embedded in every institution, is capable of joining the plutonomies. Russia, run by gangster oligarchs and operating a Wild West form of capitalism, is already one of the club in all but name.

So, why are nations such as France and Germany not fully signed up to the OWO agenda? One of the greatest events in human history was the Illuminati-inspired French Revolution of 1789 that proclaimed the Enlightenment values of liberty, equality and fraternity. In the bloody period known as the “Terror”, thousands of aristocrats and counter-revolutionaries were guillotined as enemies of the state. In the aftermath of the revolution, Napoleon’s zealous, well-trained citizen army conquered most of Europe and spread the ideas of the Enlightenment and the Revolution.

This was an unparalleled disaster for the OWO. They lost much of their power in continental Europe, and they have never truly recovered it, despite repeated attempts. Of course, Britain, home of the OWO and protected by the English Channel, was unconquered by Napoleon, and played a decisive role in his defeat. However, the OWO were horrified, and remain horrified to this day, by what was done to them and their supporters during the Terror. All the money in the world couldn’t save them when the people righteously turned against them. The OWO’s greatest fear is that the people will again find the courage and determination to overthrow them. Their thinking has been directed towards preventing any repetition. Their masterstroke was to embrace what they had always opposed – democracy, the power of the people. Except what they provided was the illusion of democracy rather than democracy itself. In reality, they bought the politicians and the political parties, and they controlled the banking system i.e. the money and hence the economy. The people had no true power at all, but they imagined they had, and that proved sufficient.

In America, Britain, Canada and Australia, fake democracy has been a wild success. It hasn’t proved quite so successful elsewhere. Scandinavian countries have opted for something approaching proper democracy. Countries such as Germany, Italy and Spain have endured devastating periods of Fascist rule by dictators. France has failed to live up to the values of its own Revolution. Switzerland is obsessed with secretive, private banking. The Netherlands, once an astonishingly liberal country, is becoming progressively less liberal due to Islamic immigration. Eastern Europe is still recovering from Communist rule. The Greek economy is in freefall. Islamic countries intensely dislike democracy since it threatens Islamic theocracy. India, with its vile caste system, is hardly suitable democratic material. China is still Communist, at least nominally. Russia has become a rogue, cowboy state. South American countries oscillate between Communism and Fascism. African countries are still trying to escape from their colonial pasts. They’re choked by corruption, nepotism and cronyism. All in all, much of the world is fucked, unable to find a viable, stable, progressive political system. The Scandinavian countries come closest to egalitarianism, but they are still far from ideal.

Another section of the Citigroup document is entitled: “The United States Plutonomy – the Gilded Age, the Roaring Twenties, and the New Managerial Aristocracy.”

It says, “[The] top 1% of households in the U.S., (about 1 million households) accounted for about 20% of overall U.S. income in 2000, slightly smaller than the share of income of the bottom 60% of households put together. That’s about 1 million households compared with 60 million households, both with similar slices of the income pie! Clearly, the analysis of the top 1% of U.S. households is paramount. The usual analysis of the ‘average’ U.S. consumer is flawed from the start. To continue with the U.S., the top 1% of households also account for 33% of net worth, greater than the bottom 90% of households put together. It gets better (or worse, depending on your political stripe) – the top 1% of households account for 40% of financial net worth, more than the bottom 95% of households put together. This is data for 2000, from the Survey of Consumer Finances (and adjusted by academic Edward Wolff). Since 2000 was the peak year in equities, and the top 1% of households have a lot more equities in their net worth than the rest of the population who tend to have more real estate, these data might exaggerate the U.S. plutonomy a wee bit.

“Was the U.S. always a plutonomy – powered by the wealthy, who aggrandized larger chunks of the economy to themselves? Not really. For those interested in the details, we recommend ‘Wealth and Democracy: A Political History of the American Rich’ by Kevin Phillips, Broadway Books, 2002.”

So there you have it: 1% of American households have greater financial net worth than the bottom 95% of American households put together. So, a very simple question becomes inescapable – is America genuinely a democracy, or is “plutocracy” a more apt description? Is it ruled by the people or by the rich? And if the latter is true, is that not a fundamental breach of the American Constitution? Isn’t the concentration of so much power and wealth in the hands of so few incompatible with democracy? Isn’t the current form of American democracy illegal in terms of the original intentions of the Founding Fathers? Isn’t it anti-constitutional? Haven’t all the “checks and balances” that were designed to keep the rich and powerful reined in failed? Isn’t it simply a new tyranny, just like that of the British Empire which American patriots gave their lives to overthrow? The section continues: “Indeed, the fortunes of the top 5% (or even top 10%), or the top 1%, are almost entirely driven by the fortunes of the top 0.1% (roughly 100,000 households).”

In other words, America is, to all intents and purposes, in the control of just 100,000 households. And who is in charge of these top households? The Old World Order! All they need to do is ensure that the top households are onboard with their agenda and everything else takes care of itself. It’s one of the great fallacies that the OWO are obsessively monitoring what ordinary people do, constantly spying on everyone. They couldn’t care less. Ordinary people are an irrelevance to the OWO. The Elite almost never come into contact with ordinary people. Their lives are specifically arranged to ensure minimal exposure to the rabble, the canaille. They barely breathe the same air. The OWO’s attitude towards ordinary people is like that of the Nazis towards the ghettoes that they constructed for the Jews in WWII. They put all the Jews in a city into a slum section, walled it off and then left them to rot. They didn’t care what the Jews did within those walls. They didn’t spy on them. They had no need. And nor do the OWO have any need to spy on you. Nor do they need to microchip you. Your credit cards and store cards provide all the information they need about you.

In the ghettoes, the Jews administered themselves. The elders allocated food, organized police, decided who would be shipped off to the death camps, filled the cattle wagons etc. The Germans didn’t have to raise a finger. Nor do the OWO. In the death camps, the Nazis performed the “selection” of the Jews who got off the trains, deciding who would become slave labourers and would be exterminated immediately, and they were responsible for dropping the Zyklon B pellets into the showers, but that was about all they did. The Jewish “special commandos” were the ones who removed the bodies and took them to the crematoria for disposal. The Jews did all the dirty work, not the Nazis. Some SS guards barely saw anything of what was going on in the camps, so far removed were they from the daily squalor that the Jews were forced to endure.

The OWO are just modern day SS, completely insulated from all the horrors they have inflicted on others. Just as the SS viewed the Jews as subhuman objects, so the OWO view ordinary men and women as “unpersons”. And haven’t they been proved right? Just as virtually no Jews fought back against the Nazis, virtually none of the people resist the OWO. The Citigroup document explains that the rich started to become the super-rich when Margaret Thatcher in the UK and Ronald Reagan in the US introduced massive deregulation and ultra-capitalist economic policies. All brakes were removed. This was the so-called “Anglo-Saxon” economic model.

The document says, “The rise in their share [that of the super-rich] since the mid-eighties might be related to the reduction in corporate and income taxes. Also, to a new wave of entrepreneurs and managers earning disproportionate incomes as they drove and participated in the ongoing technology boom. [While] in the early 20th century capital income was the big chunk for the top 0.1% of households, the resurgence in their fortunes since the mid-eighties was mainly from oversized salaries. The rich in the U.S. went from coupon-clipping, dividend-receiving rentiers to a Managerial Aristocracy indulged by their shareholders.”

Note the phrase “oversized salaries”. This is the key to the modern age. Managers and executives have realized they can pay themselves practically anything they like and no one will stop them. Golden handshakes, golden handcuffs, golden parachutes, enormous bonuses, vast allowances and add-ons, extravagant expense accounts, superlative remuneration “packages”, extraordinary pension payments… these people have never had it so good. They can scarcely believe their luck. No one in power takes a single step to rein them back. In fact all those in power are part of the same lucrative gravy train. It’s just the ordinary people who are left out in the cold. And who cares about those mugs and suckers? And, of course, since the Zionists control the world’s banking system, they feel they have a moral right to avenge themselves against the Christians who persecuted them. Don’t look to them to regulate themselves. They are out for revenge, and they are getting it in abundance.

The Citigroup document continues: “The reasons why some societies generate plutonomies and others don’t are somewhat opaque, and we’ll let the sociologists and economists continue debating this one. Kevin Phillips in his masterly ‘Wealth and Democracy’ argues that a few common factors seem to support ‘wealth waves’ – a fascination with technology (an Anglo-Saxon thing according to him), the role of creative finance, a cooperative government, an international dimension of immigrants and overseas conquests invigorating wealth creation, the rule of law, and patenting inventions.”

Note the following: CREATIVE FINANCING (i.e. dodgy accountants cooking the books and left to get on with it by Government auditors), COOPERATIVE GOVERNMENT (i.e. puppet politicians doing their masters’ bidding), OVERSEAS CONQUESTS INVIGORATING WEALTH CREATION (check out the extraordinary riches that, thanks to the Iraq War, fell into the hands of Halliburton Corporation, of which war-mongering former Vice President Dick Cheney was once the Chairman and CEO). As for the allegedly unique Anglo-Saxon fascination with technology, the highly technological Japanese and Europeans might choose to differ.

In a section entitled, “Why the Plutonomy will get stronger where it exists, perhaps attract new countries”, the Citigroup analysts say, “We posit that the drivers of plutonomy in the U.S. (the UK and Canada) are likely to strengthen, entrenching and buttressing plutonomy where it exists. The six drivers of the current plutonomy: 1) an ongoing technology/biotechnology revolution, 2) capitalist friendly governments and tax regimes, 3) globalization that re-arranges global supply chains with mobile well-capitalized elites and immigrants, 4) greater financial complexity and innovation, 5) the rule of law, and 6) patent protection are all well ensconced in the U.S., the UK, and Canada. They are also gaining strength in the emerging world. Eastern Europe is embracing many of these attributes, as are China, India, and Russia. Even Continental Europe may succumb and be seduced by these drivers of plutonomy.”

In other words, the OWO want to impose their plutonomic model on the entire globe, and there can be little doubt that the greediest people in the non-plutonomic nations are currently plotting to get the same benefits as their counterparts in the plutonomies. The Citigroup analysts say, “Society and governments need to be amenable to disproportionately allow/encourage the few to retain that fatter profit share. The Managerial Aristocracy, like in the Gilded Age, the Roaring Twenties, and the thriving nineties, needs to commandeer a vast chunk of that rising profit share, either through capital income, or simply paying itself a lot. We think that despite the post-bubble angst against celebrity CEOs, the trend of cost-cutting balance sheet-improving CEOs might just give way to risk-seeking CEOs, re-leveraging, going for growth and expecting disproportionate compensation for it … Meanwhile Private Equity and LBO funds are filling the risk-seeking and releveraging void, expecting and realizing disproportionate remuneration for their skills.”

“Skills”?!! That’s one way of putting it. As for “disproportionate remuneration”, that’s certainly true. The Citigroup note continues: “Our contention: when the top, say 1% of households in a country see their share of income rise sharply, i.e. a plutonomy emerges, this is often in times of frenetic technology/financial innovation driven wealth waves, accompanied by asset booms, equity and/or property. Feeling wealthier, the rich decide to consume a part of their capital gains right away. In other words, they save less from their income, the well-known wealth effect. The key point though is that this new lower savings rate is applied to their newer massive income. Remember they got a much bigger chunk of the economy, that’s how it became a plutonomy. The consequent decline in absolute savings for them (and the country) is huge when this happens. They just account for too large a part of the national economy; even a small fall in their savings rate overwhelms the decisions of all the rest.

“To summarize so far, plutonomies see the rich absorb a disproportionate chunk of the economy, their decision to lower their savings rate, often corresponding to the asset booms that often accompany plutonomy, has a massive negative impact on reported aggregate numbers like savings rates, current account deficits, consumption levels, etc.”

In other words, it’s easy for the super-rich to unleash a tidal wave of spending and consumption that can destabilize an entire economy, regardless of whether or not the bottom 95% of households are managing their financial affairs extremely prudently or not. The super-rich don’t care about savings because they have so much income rolling in each month. And if they need some extra money, they can just award themselves a fat bonus or massive pay increase. Sorted!

IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT 95% OF HOUSEHOLDS DO. THE ECONOMY IS NOT BEING RUN FOR THEIR BENEFIT, AND IS NOT UNDER THEIR CONTROL. ARE YOU CONTENT TO BE PART OF AN ECONOMIC SYSTEM THAT REGARDS YOU AS IRRELEVANT? IS THAT WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A MEMBER OF A SO-CALLED DEMOCRACY? THAT YOU HAVE NO SAY IN YOUR ECONOMY?

The Boston Tea Party famously objected to being taxed without representation in the parliament that was doing the taxing i.e. they objected to the economy not being theirs to control. Changed days! Now the American people are willing to tolerate having no economic control whatever over their own destiny, to tolerate being taxed to serve the interests of a super-rich Elite rather than their own interests. Congress couldn’t care less about the people. It exists to carry out the will of the Old World Order. A plutonomy is inconsistent with democracy. Whatever happened to the Americans? How did they become so brainwashed, so compliant, so docile, so unlike the patriots that defeated the tyrannical British Empire?

The Citigroup analysts then discuss what could cause the “death” of plutonomy:

“At the heart of plutonomy, is income inequality. Societies that are willing to tolerate/endorse income inequality, are willing to tolerate/endorse plutonomy…So an examination of what might disrupt Plutonomy – or worse, reverse it – falls to societal analysis: will electorates continue to endorse it, or will they end it, and why.

“Organized societies have two ways of expropriating wealth – through the revocation of property rights or through the tax system. Capital markets, like human beings, generally strive for certainty and stability. The pricing of assets is easier, projections more comfortable, etc. For this reason, in developed capital markets, governments have learnt the lessons of level playing fields, regulatory certainty, and the sanctity of property rights.

However this does not mean that governments are incapable of revoking property rights. While this tends to be something more often seen in countries with a shorter history of capitalist democracy, such as the Ukraine (attempts to undo prior privatizations), or Russia (where some of our clients believe events surrounding Mikhail Khodorovsky to be a form of nationalization), it can happen in the strangest of places. For example, in 2001, UK government withdrawal of financial support bankrupted Railtrack, the UK rail operator, effectively renationalizing railway assets on the cheap. But these moves are exceptional and generally counter-productive as they raise the risk premium, in theory, for future transactions with that power. If the government is willing to be a contestant and simultaneously set and change the rules of the game to their advantage, the rewards of the game must rise to attract other participants.

“The more likely means of expropriation is through the tax system. Corporate tax rates could rise, choking off returns to the private sector, and personal taxation rates could rise – dividend, capital-gains, and inheritance tax rises would hurt the plutonomy.

“There is a third way to change things though not necessarily by expropriation, and that is to slow down the rate of wealth creation or accumulation by the rich – generally through a reduction in the profit share of GDP. This could occur through a change in rules that affect the balance of power between labor and capital. Classic examples of this tend to fall under one of two buckets – the regulation of the domestic labor markets through minimum wages, regulating the number of hours worked, deciding who can and cannot work etc, or by dictating where goods and services can be imported from (protectionism). “In the plutonomies, there seems little threat from the first of these challenges: blatant expropriation of property by governments. There are few examples of governments changing the rules in the plutonomies and engaging in widespread nationalization, or asset re-distribution.

“Likewise, if anything, the trends of taxation are positive for corporates, with fiscal competition in Europe forcing rates lower, year by year. Ironically, this is happening most in non-plutonomy countries, like Germany. This is good for the profit share, of which the mega-rich, through their holdings of equity, are “long”.

“However, even if the profit share is rising, the fruits of those profits could be taxed before ending up in the pockets of the rich. In other words, dividend, capital gains and estate taxes could all rise. However, we struggle to find examples of this happening. Indeed, in the U.S., the current administration’s attempts to change the estate tax code and make permanent dividend tax cuts, plays directly into the hands of the plutonomy.

“While such Pluto-friendly policies are not widely being copied around the world, we have not found examples of the opposite occurring elsewhere.

“Protectionism or regulation. Here, we believe lies a cornerstone of the current wave of plutonomy, and with it, the potential for capitalists around the world to profit. The wave of globalisation that the world is currently surfing, is clearly to the benefit of global capitalists, as we have highlighted. But it is also to the disadvantage of developed market labor, especially at the lower end of the food-chain.

“There are periodic attempts by countries to redress this balance – Jospin’s introduction of the 35 hour working week in France to the anticipated benefit of labor being one example. But in general, on-going globalisation is making it easier for companies to either outsource manufacturing (source from cheap emerging markets like China and India) or “offshore” manufacturing (move production to lower cost countries).

“Brunswick, the recreational services company, is typical of the “globalized” world we now live in. We were intrigued to see in the company’s September 27 presentation, that in 2000, the company had 17 manufacturing/procurement centers globally, 14 of them in North America, high cost European countries or Japan. Today, five years later, they have 40 manufacturing/sourcing /engineering centers. Of these half are in low-cost countries. Such examples abound in today’s globalized world.

“The final option for countries willing to consider it, is to insource labor. For example, in the UK, between May 2004 accession of the 10 new countries into the EU, and March 2005, 176,000 workers have moved from the accession countries to the UK and joined the workforce. Leaving aside any demand benefits they might bring, this does, in theory keep the price of labor contained. It interests us that the Plutonomy countries (U.S.A, UK, Australia, and Canada) all have – generally – a welcoming attitude to skilled immigration. Of the pre-accession EU 15 countries, only a handful, the UK and Ireland included allow full and free labor movement from the new EU 10 countries into their labor markets. The vast majority, Germany, Austria, Italy etc., are refusing to allow accession countries full freedom of movement until 2009-11.

“So, property rights look as if they are being protected, tax policies helpful, and the profit share should continue to rise, through globalization and the productivity/technology wave. “Our conclusion? The three levers governments and societies could pull on to end plutonomy are benign. Property rights are generally still intact, taxation policies neutral to favorable, and globalization is keeping the supply of labor in surplus, acting as a brake on wage inflation.”

Well, why wouldn’t conditions be benign for the plutonomists? Their governments work for them. They’re never going to change the rules, except to the further benefit of the super-rich.

“The wave of globalization that the world is currently surfing, is clearly to the benefit of global capitalists, as we have highlighted. But it is also to the disadvantage of developed market labor, especially at the lower end of the food-chain.”

Here we have the current trend in the world in a nutshell. The OWO want to extend their existing model to every nation of the earth. They have absolute disregard for those at the bottom of the “food chain”. So, isn’t it time for a New World Order to sweep away this disgraceful plutonomic model of the OWO?

The Citigroup analysts pose the question: “Is there a backlash building?” They say, “Plutonomy, we suspect is elastic. Concentration of wealth and spending in the hands of a few, probably has its limits. What might cause the elastic to snap back? We can see a number of potential challenges to plutonomy. The first, and probably most potent, is through a labor backlash. Outsourcing, offshoring or insourcing of cheap labor is done to undercut current labor costs. Those being undercut are losers in the short term. While there is evidence that this is positive for the average worker (for example Ottaviano and Peri) it is also clear that high-cost substitutable labor loses.”

Let’s highlight a sentence or two: “Outsourcing, offshoring or insourcing of cheap labor is done to undercut current labor costs. Those being undercut are losers in the short term.”

If you belong to “labor” you would be insane to support a plutonomy. Their entire strategy is to hammer down your pay to next to nothing, to as low as the lowest acceptable wage on earth, which is pretty damned low if you think of the sweat shops of Southeast Asia. They say you are the losers in the short term. Are they kidding? You are the losers forever. Unless you get re-skilled and re-educated (at your own expense), you’re doomed.

“Low-end developed market labor might not have much economic power, but it does have equal voting power with the rich. We see plenty of examples of the outsourcing or offshoring of labor being attacked as ‘unpatriotic’ or plain unfair. This tends to lead to calls for protectionism to save the low-skilled domestic jobs being lost. This is a cause championed, generally, by left-wing politicians. At the other extreme, insourcing, or allowing mass immigration, which might price domestic workers out of jobs, leads to calls for anti-immigration policies, at worst championed by those on the far right. To this end, the rise of the far right in a number of European countries, or calls (from the right) to slow down the accession of Turkey into the EU, and calls from the left to rebuild trade barriers and protect workers (the far left of Mr. Lafontaine, garnered 8.5% of the vote in the German election, fighting predominantly on this issue), are concerning signals. This is not something restricted to Europe. Sufficient numbers of politicians in other countries have championed slowing immigration or free trade (Ross Perot, Pauline Hanson etc.).” So, “Low-end developed market labor might not have much economic power, but it does have equal voting power with the rich.”

Well then, why not vote the rich out? What’s wrong with people? They give the impression of being cast from the same mould as the turkeys that vote for Christmas.

“A second related threat, might come from productive labor no longer maintaining its productive edge. Again, we find Kevin Phillips’s arguments in his book, Wealth and Democracy, fascinating. Phillips highlights the problems in the late 1700s Netherlands, where an increasing obsession with financial speculation (sound familiar?) caused nonfinancial skilled labor that had built that country’s wealth, to seek their success in other countries. Likewise, Britain’s failure to keep its educational advantage in what were then high-tech areas caused them to lose their competitive advantage that had been maintained until the First World War. Are there similarities with Asian economies, versus the plutonomies, today?

“A third threat comes from the potential social backlash. To use Rawls-ian analysis, the invisible hand stops working. Perhaps one reason that societies allow plutonomy, is because enough of the electorate believe they have a chance of becoming a Plutoparticipant. Why kill it off, if you can join it? In a sense this is the embodiment of the “American dream”. But if voters feel they cannot participate, they are more likely to divide up the wealth pie, rather than aspire to being truly rich.”

The odds of correctly drawing any six numbers from 49 to win the UK national lottery are 14 million to one against. If 14 million people play each week, one is likely to win, but anyone who relies on winning the lottery is insane. The odds against fulfilling the American dream are probably around a million to one against. Anyone who plays that game is crazy, yet most Americans seem to see it as a realistic possibility. It is that deranged hope that underpins the OWO’s domination of America. Any sensible person would ask for a fair share of the pie rather than holding out to be one of the few who get more pie than they could ever eat. Now is the time to make this the ONLY battleground. It’s time to abolish plutonomies.

“Could the plutonomies die because the dream is dead, because enough of society does not believe they can participate? The answer is of course yes. But we suspect this is a threat more clearly felt during recessions, and periods of falling wealth, than when average citizens feel that they are better off. There are signs around the world that society is unhappy with plutonomy – judging by how tight electoral races are. But as yet, there seems little political fight being born out on this battleground.”

“A related threat comes from the backlash to “Robber-baron” economies. The population at large might still endorse the concept of plutonomy but feel they have lost out to unfair rules. In a sense, this backlash has been epitomized by the media coverage and actual prosecution of high-profile ex-CEOs who presided over financial misappropriation. This ‘backlash’ seems to be something that comes with bull markets and their subsequent collapse. To this end, the cleaning up of business practice, by high profile champions of fair play, might actually prolong plutonomy.

“Our overall conclusion is that a backlash against plutonomy is probable at some point. However, that point is not now. So long as economies continue to grow, and enough of the electorates feel that they are benefiting and getting rich in absolute terms, even if they are less well off in relative terms, there is little threat to Plutonomy in the U.S., UK, etc.”

Wrong! The backlash is here.

“But the balance of power between right (generally proplutonomy) and left (generally pro-equality) is on a knife-edge in many countries. Just witness how close the U.S. election was last year, or how close the results of the German election were. A collapse in wealth in the plutonomies, felt by the masses, and/or prolonged recession could easily raise the prospects of antiplutonomy policy.

“As the rich have been getting progressively richer over the last 30 years, saving less and spending more, the fortunes of companies that sell to the rich ought to have been good. Not only have the rich been earning and spending more, but they are less price elastic than typical consumers. In fact we believe they have a preference for Giffen goods, i.e., the more expensive they are, the more they are purchased.”

Conspicuous consumption: the super-rich want to be seen buying the most expensive goods, those forever out of the reach of ordinary people. That’s how they signify to you that they are vastly superior to you.

“One way we can measure this is to look at price inflation for a basket of luxury goods. Thankfully, Forbes magazine each year publishes its ‘Cost of Living Extremely Well’ Indices, which measures annual price changes in a basket of high end consumer items, from luxury yachts, to the cost of dinner at the world’s top restaurants, right down to the cost of a pair of fine English shoes.” The Citigroup analysts refer to something that they call the CLEW Index – the Cost of Living Extremely Well!

“CLEWI is an inflation index of the cost of luxury goods. It measures such things as the cost of a suite at the Four Seasons in New York (up 15% year on year) and a kilo of Imperial Beluga caviar (at US$6840, up 40% year on year). In 2005, the CLEW Index rose 4%, while US CPI rose at 3.6%.”

Citigroup chooses not to discuss the index relevant to enormous numbers of American citizens – the CLEM – the Cost of Living Extremely Miserably.

“Conclusion. Un-equal societies abound in the Anglo-Saxon world. This income inequality, we have called Plutonomy. Secondly, we hear so often about “the consumer”. But when we examine the data, there is no such thing as “the consumer” in the U.S. or UK, or other plutonomy countries. There are rich consumers, and there are the rest. The rich are getting richer, we have contended, and they dominate consumption.”

The Anglo-Saxon economic and political model is sick. It is poisoning the whole world. It is the chosen paradigm of the OWO and they wish to extend it across the globe. They want massive inequality; a tiny super-rich elite and an enormous population of compliant, subservient workers, slaving away for a pittance and continually cutting each other’s throats to remain “competitive”. The world would be insane to become “Anglo Saxon”. If you want the rich to get richer, for you to be lumped in with the “rest”, with the also-rans, then vote Anglo Saxon. If you have any dignity and self-respect, kill this Anglo Saxon model stone dead before it’s too late.

IF YOU HITCH YOUR HORSE TO A RUNAWAY TRAIN, YOU WILL GET TOTALLY FUCKED!!!

The Anglo-Saxon plutonomies are the runaway train of the super-rich. If you get onboard you’re heading for catastrophe. Two of the Citigroup authors were Indians. Elite Indians are natural plutonomists. They are accustomed, via the caste system, to a few people living in unadulterated luxury while vast numbers live in extreme poverty, with those at the very bottom being regarded as subhuman – the “untouchables”. India was once the jewel in the crown of the British Empire, so it has also been infected with the Anglo-Saxon disease. It’s doubly afflicted. The OWO’s aim is to create a permanent ruling caste (which, naturally, will comprise themselves and their descendants), with everyone else belonging to a permanent slave caste. The hereditary monarchies of medieval Europe, and the accompanying feudal system, is the model they wish to recreate, where they had absolute power and anyone who dared challenge them in any way was guilty of high treason and executed in the most gruesome ways. The great Scottish patriot William Wallace – “Braveheart” – was famously hung, drawn and quartered for daring to fight for Scottish freedom against English tyranny (just as many present-day Afghanis are slaughtered as “terrorists” for trying to kick foreign invaders out of their country). Two of the six wives of the English king Henry VIII were beheaded for adultery, a treasonable offence.

The French Revolution of 1789 was a watershed in history, and perhaps the greatest year thus far in human history. The monarch was declared a criminal enterprise and a conspiracy against the people, and the French king and his wife were beheaded for attempting to enter into an alliance with foreign powers to wage war against the French people. 1789 was the year when the people FOUGHT BACK. The time has surely come again. The Illuminati’s greatest desire is to bring about a Global Revolution to overthrow all vestiges of hereditary elites, the super-rich, the super-powerful, dynastic rule, racism, sexism, caste and class systems, second class citizens, two-tier societies. Everyone on earth should be given an equal opportunity to achieve greatness, and those who rise highest should do so on the basis of their demonstrable merit alone. All networks of privilege, nepotism, cronyism and religious favouritism must be destroyed.

Masters and slaves – the oldest story ever told. Which side are you on? That of the elite or that of the people? If the latter then it’s your duty to work for the overthrow of the elite. Do you want to be an eternal slave? Then now is the hour to overthrow the false masters.

Abolish the Anglo-Saxon model.
Abolish plutonomies.
Abolish caste systems.
Abolish privilege.
BE FREE.

“It is better to die on your feet than live on your knees.” –Dolores Ibárruri (“La Pasionaria”)
__________

6/9

In the United Kingdom, a ridiculous woman refers to herself as the “Queen”, lives in numerous palaces (paid for by the people), insists on her “subjects” waving flags, bowing and singing an anthem to her wherever she appears, and expects them to walk backwards to leave her royal presence. Yet the United Kingdom calls itself a democracy that cherishes freedom and equality. What a farce. Who do they think they’re kidding? The Queen is a senior member of the Old World Order. She is the embodiment of anti-meritocracy. All monarchs must be resisted.

The UK is a nation stuck in the past, dominated by a rigid class hierarchy. The Prime Minister of the UK is David Cameron, a millionaire who is married to the daughter of Viscountess Astor. He attended Eton College (the most elite private schools in the world), followed by Oxford University where he joined the notorious Bullingdon Club where admission is open only to the rich and privileged. His explicit message to the British people is that it doesn’t matter where someone comes from, only where they are going. His implicit message is that where you come from is the only thing that matters and you are going nowhere if you do not come from the “right” background. Cameron’s second-in-command, George Osborne, also went to an elite private school (St Paul’s), Oxford University and the Bullingdon Club. The Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, also went to Eton College, Oxford University and the Bullingdon Club. And the UK is supposed to be a democracy. What a sham and a farce.

Here’s a quick way to put a stop to these people: introduce a law that declares that anyone who opts out of the state’s education system also opts out of being allowed to serve in any position paid for by the taxpayers i.e. they can’t take any public office whatever. Then the British people would be safe from being governed by the Bullingdon Club. How could any free people tolerate being governed by these ludicrous toffs? If you’re not in such a club, you have precious little chance of getting anywhere in Britain. Every nation has its equivalent. In the USA, it’s Yale’s infamous and disgraceful Skull and Bones secret society.

To look at pictures of the Bullingdon Club is to gaze at a parade inadequate, insecure clowns, hiding behind their parents’ wealth and incapable of standing on their own two feet. How can one of the leading nations of the world be governed by such sad, anachronistic individuals, dressed in the preposterous outfits of a bygone age? What century are we living in? Are we still in the Dark Ages, still locked in the feudal system where we have to touch our forelocks in the presence of our lords and masters?

The Millionaires’ Death Club by Mike Hockney is modelled on the Bullingdon Club. Clubs like the Bullingdon invariably attempt to steal the ceremonies of ancient societies such as the Illuminati, but they have no concept of the true purpose of the Illuminati’s ceremonies, which is to contact the Higher Self. They have understood nothing. They are blinded by greed and selfishness.
__________

Meritocracy II:

The Illuminati are meritocrats. Only meritocracy, not democracy, can deliver a world where there are neither masters nor slaves. Masters are those who are able to control vastly more resources than others. Therefore, meritocracy advocates preventing anyone from acquiring excessive resources. Only when the richest person in a nation is, say, just ten to twenty times wealthier than the poorest can the circumstances exist for masters and slaves to vanish from society. In a capitalist democracy, the system devised by the Old World Order to allow them to hold the people in their tyrannical grasp, the richest person can be worth a million times more than the poorest. In such a system, the winners take all. The winners are the Old World Order, and the rest of us are losers, suckers, cowards and slaves. But we can change the system at any time. After all, there are vastly more of us. What’s stopping us? Do we have no dignity, no self-respect, no courage?

Why has capitalist democracy proved so apparently successful, to the extent that virtually no one dares to challenge it? No debate in the media ever takes place about the replacement of capitalist democracy. Even during the current financial meltdown, no rivals to capitalist democracy have been proposed. Why not? Because the masters won’t allow the system that has brought them such spectacular wealth and power to be toppled. Sure, you can change your President or Prime Minister, but you can’t change the system, and it is the system that is the problem, not the identity of the figurehead.

Capitalist democracy is, however, doomed because it is dialectically unstable. Capitalism is an ideology based on extreme inequality. It is an economic system designed by and for masters. It revolves around a tiny number of people – the rich masters with vast amounts of capital – using the labour of slaves (us, the work drones) to generate enormous profits.

Karl Marx predicted that this system would implode and be replaced by communism – the common ownership of all of a nation’s assets by the people – and he would have been proved right had the masters not seen the danger. They produced a brilliant dialectical response – they harnessed democracy to capitalism.

Democracy is an ideology based on equality: one man one vote; every vote has equal weight to every other vote. The masters massively extended the vote to groups that had previously been denied voting rights. In a country like the USA, the ordinary people – the slaves – were allowed the illusion that every four years they could decide who was in charge of their nation. This illusion was all that was needed to persuade the slaves that they were in control of their own destiny, that they were free.

Yet look at an American election such as the one in 2004 – Bush versus Kerry: two extremely wealthy men, both members of Yale’s notorious Skull and Bones Masonic secret society. The genius of using democracy, from the Old World Order’s viewpoint, is that it doesn’t matter for whom the people vote for as long as they – the Old World Order – choose the candidates. If Kerry had won the election, the Old World Order would still have had their man in the White House. It doesn’t matter who wins or loses the election: the Old World Order always stay in charge.

The President is either a member of the Old World Order, or meets with their full approval. Someone like Obama, even though an outsider, is nevertheless someone who will never threaten the Old World Order’s hegemony. He wouldn’t have been allowed to set foot in the White House if the Old World Order thought he would damage their interests. They viewed Obama as a means of re-establishing the credibility of capitalist democracy after the disastrous Bush years. Obama’s job is to act as a PR man and cheerleader for capitalist democracy. Even his most enthusiastic fans must already see that nothing significant will change under his presidency. The Old World Order’s power will be as strong as ever. There is nothing any President can do to change things. The entire American political and economic system is designed to prevent any serious challenge to capitalism, the bedrock of the Old World Order’s power and riches. To reiterate, the Old World Order’s power is based on disguising their commitment to inequality (capitalism) by harnessing it to democracy, an ideology of equality. The democratic element is sufficient to deceive the slaves while the masters go about their business of greedily serving their own interests. The excesses of the Wall Street Gang in the years leading up to the current financial disaster are amongst the most egregious in history, yet this was taking place within a so-called democracy.

Did a single democrat have any say whatsoever in what was going on in Wall Street? Yet who’s picking up the tab now? “No taxation without representation” was the great slogan of the American Revolution, yet the American people have picked up a vast tax bill to bail out the bankers. Did the people have any representation in the boardrooms of Wall Street? None at all. Did they have any say in the enormous salaries, bonuses, pensions, stock options, perks? Don’t you get it? Capitalism is all about the masters while democracy is all about pretending to the slaves that they can change things. They can’t. Not ever.

The other measure the masters took to protect their position was the introduction of welfare provisions. The great revolutions in France and Russia (in 1789 and 1917) took place because the people were literally starving to death and had to fight for their lives. If the rulers of France and Russia had provided a welfare state, no revolutions would have occurred.

The masters now ensure that the slaves have a reasonable degree of comfort. And the slaves are no longer mere workers. They are consumers now, and via consumption they bring more wealth to the masters. By giving us democracy, a standard of living that maintains most of us in reasonable comfort, and the opportunity for us to consume a huge variety of things, the masters create the illusion that we are free rather than slaves. And we fall for it. Yet behind the curtain, the masters control everything. We have traded our self-respect and our souls for the baubles and trinkets they throw at us, for the scraps they toss at us from their high tables. How grateful we are for our petty lives as consumers of the junk they sell us.

Most of us are “respectable” slaves, but there is also an underclass of those who are not judged respectable. Marx referred to the underclass as the “lumpenproletariat”: the “refuse of all classes,” including “swindlers, confidence tricksters, brothel-keepers, rag-and-bone merchants, beggars, and other flotsam of society”. They are dispossessed and powerless. Trotsky believed that the underclass were reactionary and counter-revolutionary, and generally highly supportive of the upper classes.

This is classic slave behaviour: admiring the very people who oppress you. Many of the supporters of the right wing American Republican Party – the main party of the Old World Order – are members of the underclass. They are frequently fundamentalist Christians (a slave morality), and advocates of capitalism (even though they themselves have no capital) and have dead-end jobs or no jobs at all. When people vote for the masters who have made them slaves, they have lost all self-respect. They are perfectly brainwashed. A chain is only as strong as its weakest ink. If our society is regarded as a chain then it is falling apart. Weak links are everywhere, and most visibly in the underclass. The underclass is left to rot. They have few or no prospects of bettering themselves. They are a drain on the rest of society, a source of criminality. A large criminal justice system is required to deal with them. Police, prisons, welfare organisations, community centres, social workers, and government agencies are needed in abundance. It costs a fortune to supply all of this (and even then it’s not nearly enough), but to achieve what? Simply to prevent these people going on the rampage.

Is it healthy for society to have a large and growing underclass? But don’t forget why the underclass exists – they have been deliberately starved of resources in order to ensure that the masters – the Old World Order – can enjoy an excess of resources. Imagine that there is set amount of wealth in the world. Everyone who gets more than the average, more than his fair share, is, in effect, depriving others. Is that moral? The Old World Order impoverish the underclass in order to enrich themselves, and the rest of society acts as a buffer between the masters and the lowest slaves.

Under a meritocracy, the absurd inequality that appears under capitalism would be abolished, but so would the sterile and false equality that characterises a system such as communism. Both capitalism and communism are LCD – lowest common denominator – ideologies. In communism, the laziest, most stupid person is guaranteed the same rewards as the hardest-working, most talented person, and hence the talented hard-worker loses any motivation and the system rapidly degenerates. The talented lose all incentive to make optimal use of their skills.

Under capitalism, the production of goods is based on the popularity of those goods, which in turn reflects the quality of the people. Stupid, untalented people have stupid, untalented tastes. They love popcorn, movies, reality TV, game shows, chat shows, sitcoms, hospital, legal and crime dramas and all the rest of the dross that is shown 24/7. A nation of slaves has slave tastes. Everywhere, quality is sacrificed for cheap, gaudy goods with instant appeal. The system is based on short-term gratification and cheap thrills. Everything is disposable. Nothing lasts. In a short time, quality vanishes from capitalism since it simply isn’t profitable enough: there are too few people of quality.

Communism and capitalism are both catastrophic. Marx’s dialectical analysis was wrong. Communism is not the inevitable victor over capitalism. Communism is the equal and opposite pole of capitalism, and just as bad. Extremes of equality and inequality are equally damaging. Another point must me made about communism. It is nothing but a secularised form of Christianity. Jesus Christ’s “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”, is simply a different way of saying Marx’s “From each according to his abilities to each according to his needs.” The two systems are morally identical. They both revile masters and promote complete equality. Communism is Christianity without Christ, which is why it is so feared by the leaders of the Christian world. It renders them redundant.

Christianity, unlike communism, has historically found favour with the masters, with emperors, kings and dictators. Why? Because it allows them to exploit the slaves as much as they like. “Render unto Caesar,” says Christ. That means obey your masters. The communists on the other hand say resist your masters. “Turn the other cheek,” says Christ. The communists say, “Better to die on your feet than live on your knees.” Christ says that his people will gain their reward in the afterlife. Communists say that there is no afterlife and the reward must come here and now. ”Love your enemies,” says Christ. The communists say overthrow them, with violent revolution if necessary. Christ tells us to respect private property (the masters’ property!) while for the communists all property is theft. At its core, Christianity is ambiguous, a chameleon. Communism is far more honest. No master could ever embrace communism, yet many of the worst masters in history have proudly proclaimed themselves Christian. The Old World Order loves Christianity, one of their greatest instruments of tyranny – as it was always intended to be by its founder, Christ the Deceiver.

The masters spent long decades demonising communism, the ultimate slave ideology. You never heard them breathing a word against capitalism, the most successful master ideology. Instead they demanded, and got, freer and freer markets – less and less regulation and supervision. Cui bono? They didn’t want anyone looking over their shoulders to see what they were up to. Their most profitable deals, the ones that carve up the world between them, must be carried out in the greatest of secrecy with no outside scrutiny.

And look what happened? The world was plunged into the greatest celebration of greed and excess in world history. The triumph of the masters seemed complete. They even called themselves the “Master of the Universe.” But then came the credit crunch – one of the most calamitous financial disasters of all time. And who paid for the wreckage of the economy? The masters? Don’t be absurd. The slaves footed the bill, as they always do. The dialectic that propels history has already destroyed communism, the slave ideology. Now it will turn its attention to the disaster of capitalism, the master ideology. In due course, slaves will become their own masters and masters their own slaves, and thereby all distinctions between master and slave will be negated.

Meritocracy is the higher synthesis of capitalism (the thesis) and communism (the antithesis). It strips them of their weaknesses and magnifies their strengths. It brings an end to the Dark Age of master and slave politics and economics. It’s the culmination of the dialectic. It marks the overthrow of the Old World Order. It’s not just desirable, it’s inevitable. It’s the End of History in terms of economic and political evolution. There is no stage beyond. Meritocracy is acephalous – without heads, rulers, leaders, masters. They are redundant in a world of talented people where one person is as skilled as another.

Meritocracy is an HCF – “highest common factor” – philosophy. It is not a race for the bottom, but an ascent to the top. In a meritocracy, there are no masters, no slaves, no lowest common denominator, no low quality goods and services, no pandering to the vulgar and cheap to make a fast buck.

Meritocracy advocates collaborative groups of talented individuals, each with valuable expertise. In a world of skilled people there would be no bosses and no workers. If, for some reason, a figurehead were required, that person would be appointed under the principle of primus inter pares – first amongst equals. Those who achieve great things get greater rewards than others, but not to the extent where they can markedly disadvantage others.

Do you think Obama will save you? Think again. Do you think elections every four years will save you? Think again. A revolution is needed, one that replaces both the industrial revolution of capitalism (“dark, Satanic mills”) and the communist revolutions of Marxism. We need a meritocratic revolution that will bring an end to the Old World Order and the religions of Satan.

Do not forget: any religion or ideology that requires you to bow, kneel, pray, salute, wear special uniforms, adopt submissive postures, roll out a red carpet, adore and worship gods or heroes is trying to control you. The Satanic world is full of levers of control and brainwashing. Once you are under the control of others you are alienated from yourself. You will never realise your own potential. Meritocracy is about freeing everyone from control. In a liberated world, capitalism would vanish since it is a master and slave ideology but there would be no more masters and slaves for it to operate upon. Slave religions such as Christianity, Judaism and Islam would disappear. Above all, the Old World Order would be abolished. Isn’t a world without masters and slaves worth fighting for? Isn’t it time to reject capitalist democracy and the slave religions? Isn’t it time for meritocracy and Illumination?

What are we waiting for?
Embrace the Light.
Embrace Meritocracy.
No more masters and no more slaves.
A world made up of dynamic communities of talented individuals.
The meritocratic world is the platform for humanity to take the next step of its evolution upwards – towards God.
__________

Power – The Essence of Life:

What, ultimately, drives every society that has ever existed on this planet? The answer could not be simpler. Power.

“Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” –Lord Acton

What are people addicted to? Is it sex, money, love, respect, friends, status, drugs, possessions? All of these things are, ultimately, manifestations of power. When people are afraid it is because they lack power. What is God in most people’s minds? – infinite power. By worshipping God they are associating themselves with indefatigable power. Most people worship God because they are afraid not to. That is no basis for belief in a Supreme Being.

“What is good? All that heightens the feeling of power, the will to power, power itself in man. What is bad? All that proceeds from weakness. What is happiness? The feeling that power increases – that a resistance is overcome.” –Nietzsche

The aim of conventional society is to create a pyramid of power with the Power Elite at the top and everyone else obeying their will. Once your place in the pyramid is set, there is virtually nothing you can do to escape. The opportunities for an ordinary person to rise are almost non-existent. It takes a million-to-one chance – something like a lottery win, or exceptional beauty, sporting ability, or musical talent – to permit someone from an ordinary background to ascend to near the top of the pyramid. The vast majority simply have to cling on to what they have and pray they don’t fall. Is that any basis for life?

Those at the top of the pyramid never fall, except when the other members of the Power Elite throw them to the dogs (Bernie Madoff, for example). The point of power is to ensure that, barring exceptional criminality, you can never lose power. When you die, your power is transmitted to your offspring. It will reside in your family forever. That is the gospel of the Power Elite and it is the drum beat to which the whole world has always been made to march.

Even in the old Soviet Union, an allegedly Communist country, they had the “nomenklatura” – the “names” – who enjoyed the same privileges as the leaders of the West. Look how rapidly the collapse of the Soviet Union led to the rise of the oligarchs, one of the most outrageous gangster mobs ever to plague this earth who were allowed to steal from the Russian people all the natural resources of the country and make themselves richer than Tsars.

Why do so many ordinary people take part in a game they can never win, that is stacked against them, that is rigged in every conceivable way?

Imagine going into a casino and discovering that the “House” had a 99.9% chance of winning every game played. Only fools would play. Yet all of us are in just such a casino, and the vast majority of us are choosing to play. Isn’t it time to start a new game, one where we win rather than lose all the time?

“One would make a little boy stare if one asked him: ‘Would you like to become virtuous?’ – but he will open his eyes wide if asked: ‘Would you like to become stronger than your friends?’” –Nietzsche
__________

How Capitalism Makes Us Hate Ourselves:

The beauty industry makes people feel ugly.

If everyone felt good about themselves, no one would need beauty products, and the beauty industry would collapse. Therefore the purpose of the beauty industry is to make people unhappy with their looks: to feel bad, ugly and in urgent need of a remedy, supplied, naturally, by the beauty industry.

The hygiene industry makes people feel dirty.

If everyone relied on their natural cleansing processes – the ones that have served the human race for tens of thousands of years before the invention of soap – the hygiene industry would collapse. Therefore the purpose of the hygiene industry is to make people feel neurotic about the natural state of their bodies.

The health industry makes people feel ill.

The celebrity industry makes people feel like nobodies.

The wealth industry makes people feel worthless.

The religious industry makes people feel evil.

The social networking industry makes people feel socially isolated.

These are all manifestations of capitalism. The point of capitalism is to a) make us feel bad about ourselves and b) offer us the “cure” i.e. if we buy the right products we will be “saved”.

This is the mantra of capitalism:

a) You need our product.
b) If you do not have our product you are deficient.
c) Do you want others to know that you are deficient?
d) Only our product can remove your deficiency.
e) With our product, everyone will like you. You will be more successful. You will be happier, more confident, one of life’s winners. Without our product, no one will like you. You will be unsuccessful, unhappy, less confident, one of life’s losers.

What is your greatest fear? To be below average, one of life’s losers, disliked by others, not respected, without friends, without possibilities, destined to live out your life in misery. You look at vagrants and beggars and you think that could so easily be you.

We live in a society of low self-esteem, self-hate and perpetual anxiety. Our society is all about what we don’t have, what we lack, what we need for salvation. And only our “masters”, our controllers, our capitalist providers can supply us with what we need. That is how they exploit us, how they make money from us, how they maintain their rule over us.

They have relentlessly attacked our frailties and vulnerabilities, using the most sophisticated psychological techniques to manipulate us. They have made us dependent on them, addicted to their products and propaganda. They relentlessly exploit fear. Their empire is built on fear, on making people feel bad and afraid, on making them reliant, scared of change, scared of taking responsibility, scared of standing up and resisting their oppressors.

Isn’t it time we turned psychology against them? The Last Bling King is all about how the OWO’s empire is built on sand, how they are more fragile than we are, more sustained by delusion.

The time for fear is over. Now is the time for strength, for energy, for becoming who we truly are.
__________

Split or Steal?:

“Golden Balls” is a moronic, junk TV game based on The Prisoner’s Dilemma. Yet it illustrates the workings of the Old World Order better than anything else.

In the game, a pot of money is built up and two contestants must then decide whether to “split or steal” the prize. If both contestants choose the “split” option, they each take home half of the money. If both choose “steal” then neither gets anything. If one chooses “split” and the other “steal”, the stealer takes it all. Before the final decision is taken, both contestants have a chat where they declare their apparent intentions. Of course, no one ever openly says that they are going to “steal”. The discussion invariably revolves around both contestants swearing that they can be trusted, that they would never dream of stealing and that they will definitely split the prize.

In the event, many contestants then choose the “steal” option and often reveal that it was their intention to steal right from the beginning. This crass TV programme goes to the heart of the human condition and reveals the repulsive nature of much, and perhaps most, of humanity.

Imagine the sort of person who sets out to steal rather than share a lucrative prize. He knows he will have to lie through his teeth to deceive the other contestant, yet it doesn’t deter him for a moment. At the end of the show, if he is successful in his deception, he is delighted and considers it a job well done i.e. he is ecstatic that he has duped a good, decent person who was eager to do the right thing and share the prize. He considers the other person a sucker, someone who had it coming for being so gullible and trusting. He sees himself as a master of the universe who has shafted a naïve dreamer in need of a reality check.

A feature of the show is that the audience is always delighted when two contestants share the prize, always condemns anyone who chooses the steal option and is always immensely sympathetic towards someone who chooses the “split” option and then has the prize stolen from him by the other contestant. Yet there can be no doubt that if many members of the audience were participants in the game, they too would join the “steal” gang.

What does that signify? People in a community (the audience is a community), support community values, most important of which is sharing. But people in a private capacity don’t care a damn about the community and will maximise their own self-interest, at the expense of other members of the community. Stealers obey their private will, not the general will of the community.

The show reveals another dramatic phenomenon. People who would instinctively belong to the “split” party, start worrying that the other person will steal from them and they become suspicious and distrustful. They don’t want to be a victim. So, despite their best intentions and natural inclinations, they end up choosing the “steal” option, not out of a desire for self-gain but to thwart the stealer. They know they will probably leave with nothing but at least they will stop the stealer leaving with everything. In other words, good people become corrupted by the presence of the “steal” gang. Their nature changes. They no longer trust their neighbours. Community spirit is corroded and finally destroyed.

The members of the Old World Order all belong to the “steal” gang. If they come up against each other, they leave with nothing because, reflexively, they steal from each other. So, they turn their attention to the splitters. If they find themselves amongst nice, innocent, good people, they can fleece them every time. If one stealer were amongst ninety-nine splitters, he could take everything from the whole lot of them. He’s the rotten apple that spoils the barrel. He ruins everything for everyone else, but he gets everything he wants. A stealer is someone who, instead, of sharing with his neighbour – meaning that both go away happy – takes it all, leaving his neighbour with nothing. The stealer will become the richest man in town, the person with all the power, yet he has shown by his actions that he is completely unfit to be a member of the community. The Wall Street fat cats are classic “stealers”. They always take and never give. They don’t want to share with others, they don’t want to help others, they don’t want to do anything that isn’t all about helping No 1.

The stealers are selfish, egotistical, and contemptuous of others. It’s not too strong to describe them as evil. They should be banished from the community rather than being allowed to lead it. A community can’t function if the people leading the community don’t possess community values. That’s exactly the situation we have today. The Old World Order hate society and yet they are in all of the top positions in society. The former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a truly evil person, brazenly declared, “There is no such thing as society.” Thatcher was the champion of the British steal gang. She did everything in her power to destroy society and transfer as much money as possible to the stealers. Ronald Reagan, at the same time, did a similar job in America. Those two monsters were the true authors of the credit crunch we are now enduring. They started the greed train that has only just hit the buffers. (But already the train is getting back on clear track, and it will travel faster than ever.)

No community in its right mind should ever elect anyone who is not entirely committed to the community, yet, over and over again, enemies of the people are elected to highest office. The Old World Order are out for everything they can get. Theirs is a “fuck you” approach to life. They are all sharks, carpetbaggers and robber barons. Stealers corrupt the whole of society. But stealing can take another form. In the former Communist nations of the defunct Warsaw Pact, lazy, inept workers stole, in a moral sense, from hard-working, talented workers. They stole by wanting and expecting to be paid exactly the same as the hard workers even though they themselves had not worked hard. This insidious form of theft is as corrosive to a healthy community as the more explicit type of stealing.

The Illuminati seek a New World Order and that means that stealers will, by hook or by crook, be removed from the community. If stealers are present in a community, they always poison it. They cannot be permitted to contaminate society. The greedy, the stealers, the Old World Order must be driven out. They are the damned. Jean-Jacques Rousseau said, “In order that the social compact may not be an empty formula, it tacitly includes the undertaking, which alone can give force to the rest, that whoever refuses to obey the general will shall be compelled to do so by the whole body. This means nothing less than that he will be forced to be free.”

For any community to succeed, everyone must abide by community values. Those who do not subscribe to those values cannot be tolerated. The Old World Order are the enemies of the people. It is because of their greed and selfishness that we live in societies where crime, poverty, cruelty and lack of compassion are rife. Most of us are natural splitters but we have been turned into callous monsters by the stealers amongst us.

A community can and should have liberal values – anyone can do anything they like as long as it brings no harm to others – but it should have zero tolerance towards those who do harm. The stealers are, by definition, those who take from others rather than sharing. That’s the antithesis of community. It cannot be tolerated.

In a New World Order, there would be only splitters and no stealers. Everyone would get their fair share. Everyone could trust everyone else. No thief would walk away with everyone else’s money. The stealers are liars, cheats and crooks. Do you want people like that leading you? That’s what we have at the moment. Our system actually rewards the stealers. When they steal our money, they become more powerful and are then able to steal even more from us. Everyone in any position of power in this world belongs to the steal gang and all of the world’s problems stem from that single fact. We need leaders who are natural sharers and wouldn’t dream of stealing. One sure sign would mark out such people – they would never be conspicuously rich, and neither would they seek great wealth. Of how many of the world’s leaders can that be said? It’s time to depose the Old World Order. It’s time to build a New World Order of fairness, justice and sharing.
__________

The Junk Society:

In Naked Lunch, William Burroughs describes his addiction to “junk” (opium, morphine, heroin). In truth, junk is not just opium. It is all the crap that capitalism tells us we must have. Isn’t what Burroughs says about junk, exactly what could be said about the sickness of consumerism?

“The Sickness is drug addiction and I was an addict for fifteen years. When I say addict I mean an addict to junk.”

“I have seen the exact manner in which the junk virus operates…The pyramid of junk, one level eating the level below (it is no accident that junk higher-ups are always fat and the addict in the street is always thin) right up to the top or tops since there are many junk pyramids feeding on peoples of the world and all built on basic principles of monopoly…The Pusher always gets it all back. The addict needs more and more junk to maintain a human form…buy off the Monkey…The more junk you use the less you have and the more you have the more you use.”

“Junk is the ideal product…the ultimate merchandise. No sales talk necessary. The client will crawl through a sewer and beg to buy…The junk merchant does not sell his product to the consumer, he sells the consumer to his product. He does not improve and simplify his merchandise. He degrades and simplifies the client.”

“Junk yields a basic formula of ‘evil’ virus: The Algebra of Need.”

“If we wish to annihilate the junk pyramid, we must start with the bottom of the pyramid…The addict in the street who must have junk to live is the one irreplaceable factor in the junk equation. When there are no more addicts to buy junk there will be no more junk traffic. As long as junk need exists, someone will service it.”

We must cure the junk addiction. Without the zombie consumer in the shopping mall, the whole junk edifice collapses. Do we really want shopping malls to represent the highest aspirations of humanity? They surely do at the moment. Kill the junk empire, eradicate the junk virus.
__________

The Hollywood Formula – What We Want Versus What We Need:

Many of the most successful commercial movies are based on a dichotomy between what the hero wants and what the hero needs. Usually, the hero wants something superficial, such as wealth, fame or status, when what he actually needs is something profound, such as love, wisdom or, above all, finding his soul.

During his adventure, the hero learns that what he wants is valueless, and he comes to understand what it is that he actually needs, something that was staring him in the face all along but which he was unable to see because of his wilful ignorance. Only when he becomes enlightened, when he reaches gnosis, can he comprehend that what he wants is frequently the worst thing for him, and he should devote his life to what he needs.

What people want is the world of the Demiurge, the world of seduction, temptation and trivial pleasures. It is the world of the ego. What people need is the realm of light of the True God, the world of truth, wisdom, and experiences that elevate the soul. It is the world of the Self.

We live in the society of what we want (and getting it as fast as possible) when we should be evolving towards a society that gives us what we need (and takes time and patience to do so).

Capitalism is all about giving people what they want asap – junk pleasures and pointless objects. Instant gratification. That’s why it has proved so successful. Yet the human race has never been so empty, so forlorn, so lacking in spirit. Meaning has vanished from our world. Capitalism has been a disaster for the human soul. We cry out for a new society, a New World Order, based on giving us what we need. All intelligent people are able to understand that what we need has nothing in common with what we want. This is the highest wisdom.

We have to overcome ourselves, to sublimate our trivial and counter-productive wants. We have to strive for the highest purposes, the greatest adventures, the noblest quests. If we continually surrender to the desire for easy pleasures, we will never grow, we will never become what we are, we will never achieve what we are truly capable of. We will be contemptible Last Men rather than inspiring Supermen. The Demiurge is the master of giving people what they want. That is the whole basis of the transaction of selling one’s soul to the Devil.

What humanity needs is to rediscover its soul, to take it back from the Demiurge.

Virtually every Hollywood movie obeys the formula of what we need being infinitely more profound than what we want. Yet nearly all of us remain stuck in the world of selfish wants, and, of course, the denizens of Hollywood are amongst the worst offenders i.e. those who make movies about how we must overcome ourselves to gain true insight are precisely the ones who, in real life, never overcome themselves and invariably submit eagerly to the Demiurge’s blandishments. The preachers are deaf to their own message. Isn’t that always the way of it? The Hollywood gang are amongst the least enlightened people on earth.
__________

Explicit versus Implicit messages:

We live in a society of endless hypocrisy, doublethink, double dealing, and mixed messages.

We are told that we are “created equal”, that we have equal rights, that we have freedom and democracy. Yet we live in a society where the children of the privileged elite have infinitely better life chances than the rest of us. Do the Power Elite live amongst us or in luxury mansions in exotic locations behind high gates, far from the rest of us? They have the top accountants to help them avoid paying taxes, the best lawyers to get them out of any legal problems. They have friends in the highest places to assist them with making their dreams come true. They are told from the day they are born that they are the “elite” who will run the world. Places at the finest schools and colleges are reserved for them. They will join secret societies such as Skull and Bones, and they will rule over us.

So, in what way are we equal?

We live in a society rigged against us, a society of cartels and mutual back scratchers. We are out of the loop. The world’s leaders say they are “on our side”, but they are anything but. They want our votes, but they have contempt for us. Democracy seems to give the people what they want – power to choose their leaders – but it’s certainly not what they need: to be in charge themselves. In fact what they have been given is the illusion of empowerment, the mirage that they have a choice. The reality is that they have no power at all and their choice is only between what the Power Elite is prepared to offer. Capitalism, like democracy, also gives us the illusion of choice, but all we are offered is meaningless junk. We live in a dichotomous society. We receive explicit and implicit messages. The explicit messages are the ones we hear every day from our politicians, economists, business leaders, top bankers…all the usual self-serving nonsense about how we’re all in it together, how we’re all equal, God Bless America…blah blah blah. Listen to any political broadcast and you won’t hear a single word of truth.

We are not all in together. We are not present when the good jobs are being handed out, when the money pie is being carved up, when the crucial decisions are being taken, when all the power is being allocated. We are never present when the Power Elite hold their secret meetings to decide how to run the world. The implicit messages are the only ones of interest. They are the ones that are never articulated, but they come across loud and clear to anyone who cares to listen.

The leaders of our society are saying to us: “We hate you”; “We have contempt for you”; “We are not like you”; “We are superior”; “You are the worker drones: keep your noses clean and we will leave you alone”; “Don’t get ideas above your station”; “Know your place in the power pyramid.”

Most people are so brainwashed and gullible they never hear the implicit message even though it’s coming across loud and clear. In the USA in 2000, George W Bush (a member of Skull and Bones, like his father President George H W Bush) was elected President although he lost the popular vote. He won thanks to numerous voting irregularities in the State of Florida. Who was the Governor of Florida? Jeb Bush, brother of George W Bush.

The American Supreme Court voted 5-4 to ensure that the votes in Florida were never properly counted. Who were the five who voted, in effect, to put Bush in the White House, contrary to the expressed wish of the people? Here is the roll call of shame. Their names should be carved in history in infamy: Anthony McLeod Kennedy: Appointed by Ronald Reagan (Vice President = George H. W. Bush, father of George W Bush.) Sandra Day O’Connor: Appointed by Ronald Reagan (Vice President = George H. W. Bush, father of George W Bush.) William Rehnquist: Appointed by Ronald Reagan (Vice President = George H. W. Bush, father of George W Bush.) Antonin Gregory Scalia: Appointed by Ronald Reagan (Vice President = George H. W. Bush, father of George W Bush.) Clarence Thomas: Appointed by George H. W. Bush, father of George W Bush.

In other words, conservative Supreme Court justices appointed by the Republican administration in which George W Bush’s father served voted to make George W Bush President of the USA. Americans would never have tired of criticising this outcome if it had happened in Iran or indeed any other country. They would have said it was blatantly unfair and rigged. But they didn’t say it about their own nation.

Never listen to the explicit message. It’s junk. The truth is always in the implicit message, and it’s always the same: the Power Elite shall rule and the rest of us shall serve. But what will the Power Elite do when no one is prepared to serve any longer?

Non serviam – I will not serve.
__________

The Wealth Census:

One fifth of the world are Muslims. Does anyone ever say that a powerful cabal of Muslims runs the world? Never. The Jews represent only about 0.2% of the world’s population and yet many people are convinced that some kind of Jewish cabal takes a leading role in world affairs. This belief has been persistent for hundreds of years. Without any question, many of the world’s richest individuals are Jewish. The interests of Israel are given astonishing priority by the world’s single superpower – the USA – even though, politically, it would be far more sensible for America to cultivate a friendly relationship with the Islamic world. America does the opposite. Why?

The Jews are a clever people, but the Dutch are every bit as clever, and they also form about 0.2% of the world’s population. No one ever claims that a Dutch cabal is running the world. In fact the very idea seems preposterous. But no one thinks it is preposterous that an elite group of Jews is at the top table of those running the world. Isn’t there a prima facie case to be answered here? Wall Street, Hollywood, the TV world, the academic world, the world of literature, the legal world, medicine, science, the White House are all said to be under Jewish influence.

Money, in our world, equals power. Many Jews are very rich and they use their wealth to further the interests of Jews around the world, and they do everything they can to aid the Zionist state of Israel. They are obsessed with promoting the interests of the Jewish family, the Chosen People. Those who say anything negative about anything to do with Jews are immediately branded as anti-Semitic and they are then treated as pariahs, shunned by all civilised people, and excluded from public affairs and given no media exposure.

The machine to promote Zionist interests has been refined over many generations and is now virtually perfect. No one is allowed to criticise it, no one is allowed to probe and expose it. All debate regarding it is immediately shut down, other than on the internet where practically everyone talks about it. Why is there such a difference between the internet world and official media outlets? Well, powerful Jewish moguls control most of the mainstream media, of course.

The only way to escape from this phoney war is for the richest people in the world to be compelled by the ordinary people of the world to reveal, as part of an annual census of the rich, their religious affiliations, which schools and colleges they attended, which societies they belong to, which political parties they support and which financial donations they have made to which organisations, and to reveal any “offshore” accounts they have.

Don’t the ordinary people have the absolute right to know who is controlling their lives? Let’s get it all out in the open once and for all. And to all those who object to such a compulsory census of the top 1% of the wealthy of every country – what have you got to hide? It’s time for the people to know the truth. The Annual Wealth Census or the Annual Rich List Disclosure Act should be an integral part of any “democracy”. Secrecy amongst the privileged elite is always to the detriment of the people. “Democracy” is the plaything of the elite. It is designed to make sure that the people never get to pry into the affairs of the rich. Virtually everyone ever elected has been explicitly approved by the Old World Order and is dancing to their tune.

The simplest way to end the farce is to ensure that the Power Elite will no longer be able to harbour any secrets regarding their wealth, tax position, and their social and religious networks. Could anyone seriously claim that this is an anti-democratic measure? Who are the people who will resist to the bitter end any attempt to expose the extent of their privileged lifestyles? – the Zionists and Freemasons: the Old World Order. They know that disclosure would provoke astonishment, scandal, moral outrage, resentment, rage and fury amongst the people in equal measures. The people would immediately demand that steps be taken against the elite. Revolution could erupt.

Ask yourself just one question. If the Power Elite know this would be the consequence of full disclosure, isn’t that proof in itself that they know how unjust, immoral and poisonous their privileged position is? It would cause scandal purely because it is scandalous. They know it and we know it.

No one should vote for any politician who refuses to campaign for the Annual Wealth Census. Write to your political representatives about it. Demand action. Create online petitions. Blog about it. Create websites. Set up Facebook campaigns. Go on Twitter. Make YouTube videos. Make protest songs. Make it a worldwide demand that the top 1% of the world’s wealthiest people be subjected to the closest scrutiny and be compelled to reveal all of their financial details and the details of their social networks.

With this one measure, the world would be transformed and a golden age of meritocracy ushered in. The leading meritocrats would understand that they should never be paid ridiculously more than average hard-working men and women of the world. Capitalism – the ideology that a tiny elite should be permitted to command the vast bulk of a nation’s wealth – is the Gospel of Satan. No decent, moral political or economic system can permit excessive wealth and power to fall into the hands of a privileged elite.
__________

5/9

Is there a well-known book that offers a clear roadmap for the world the OWO seek to fashion? Francis Fukuyama’s The End of History and the Last Man was a sensation when it came out in the aftermath of the Cold War. The Soviet bloc was all but impenetrable to the OWO. When it collapsed, the OWO moved in. The infamous “oligarchs” – a shadowy group if ever there was one – were in theright place at the right time with the right money and influence to seize control of the best and most lucrative natural resources of Russia: oil, gas, minerals, and metals. Their wealth and power is awe-inspiring. Moscow now rivals New York as a centre of OWO power.

The fall of Communism illustrates the OWO’s modus operandi. The OWO do not move into the failed regime and set up concentration camps. They do not enslave the population by chaining them, whipping them, locking them up. What they do is immediately grab the most precious resources for themselves and then implement their tried and tested formula of democracy and market forces. The Russian people, like their Western counterparts, are now compliant consumers in shopping malls. Those who can’t hack it drink vodka all day long. No one cares. Bush attempted to do the same thing in Iraq. (Most of the money that was pumped into the Iraqi economy ended up in the hands of wealthy, corporate friends of Bush and Cheney.) He failed because Shia Islam is resistant to the OWO. A different type of tyranny applies – that of the black-clad ayatollahs and imams.

The Iranian people (also Shia Muslims) overthrew the OWO in the shape of the Shah of Iran. The Shia Iraqis tried to overthrow Saddam Hussein (a Sunni Muslim), but were betrayed by the West. People tend to forget how popular Saddam Hussein once was with the American government in the years when he was fighting Iran. By the same token, during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, the Afghani insurgents – the future Taliban – and Osama bin Laden, were allies of America. Unlike the Shia Muslims, Sunni Muslims are far more disposed to the OWO. Look at the corrupt Saudi Royal Family. Look at the luxury shopping malls and opulent hotels in nations like Dubai. Fukuyama’s thesis was that the end of Communism would lead to the whole world adopting the western political and economic model. America would lead and everyone else would follow. There would be no more conflict. History, in the sense of great ideological struggles, would have come to an end. Western democratic market capitalism – the OWO’s power base – would be triumphant everywhere. The OWO would rule the whole world in the way they have always desired. There is clearly no “New World Order”; simply the Old World Order extended to its fullest limit.

Fukuyama was almost right, but he overlooked Islam, and history will not now end for the OWO until the conflict between the West and Islam is resolved one way or another. Fukuyama also overlooked the Illuminati. History is far from done! The OWO will not be allowed to hold the world in their greedy grip. Fukuyama referred to “the last man” – this is a term borrowed from Nietzsche and describes the type of person that will exist at the end of history when all the great battles are over and all the populist trends that Nietzsche despised had proved victorious. The last man is someone “without a chest”; a hollow man. He is feeble, a zombie, a man obsessed with petty concerns and satisfying his trivial material needs. He has no grand vision, no nobility, no spirituality. He is a sneaky, pathetic operator, trying to get as much for himself as possible, without taking any risks. He is soft and cowardly. Selfinterest is everything.

The “last man” is the person who votes in democratic elections, who tenaciously holds down his tedious 9-5 job, who goes shopping, eats junk food, watches junk telly, goes to see his sports team. The last man is already here. He is the typical Western consumer. Fukuyama refers to Hegel’s “master and slave dialectic”. We already know how this dialectic unfolded: the OWO are the masters and the rest of us are the slaves. Sure, we are not labouring in cotton fields or sugar plantations, but we are slaves all the same. Slavery is when you go along with a system that is designed to favour the few and penalise the many, and you are in no doubt that you are one of the many and you are being played by the few.

Why are we so passive? Why do we put up with it? What are we going to do about it? Slaves are people who go along with it because they think they have no choice. There is always a choice. Read Fukuyama’s book and learn about how the OWO operate and learn about yourself. It’s not too late. It’s never too late. And we all have the chance to be first men, if we have the courage.
__________

Greed and Arrogance:

The arrogance of the OWO has reached such spectacular levels that it actually goes beyond breathtaking. Many of the OWO work in finance, naturally. From where better to control the world? They are the people who caused the credit crunch that has wrecked so many lives. Millions have been thrown onto the scrap heap because of their greed. They themselves, of course, have not been impoverished. They still have their huge mansions, usually several of them, in the finest locations. They still have their gold and diamonds. They still have their yachts. Some of their funds have lost money. So what? They will soon recover all that they have lost. Only the ordinary people, those who have been wiped out, will be unable to recoup all their losses. The OWO are never afraid of recessions or depressions. These are a means of eliminating the opposition. They are buying opportunities. At the end of each downturn, the OWO invariably emerge richer, stronger and more powerful. Why do we let them get away with it?

Consider the following cases:

Despite the current financial climate, John Thain, former Goldman Sachs executive, former head of Merrill Lynch, thought he should redecorate his office at shareholders’ expense. Total cost: $1.2 million. What did he spend the money on? Here are some of the items:

1) A “commode on legs” costing $35,000.
2) Regency chairs costing $24,000.
3) A “parchment waste can” costing $1,400.
4) A Persian rug costing $85,000.
5) Services of celebrity designer Michael Smith costing $800,000.

Thain, an extremely wealthy man, did not pay for any of this. As always, others must cough up to satisfy the egotism of the masters of the universe of the OWO, the Midas Gang of gold hunters and profiteers. Thain reputedly wanted a bonus of $35 million as Merrill Lynch were preparing to announce a record-busting $15.3 billion loss and thousands of job cuts. Is it possible to imagine the degree of arrogance of someone requesting any kind of bonus given such catastrophic performance?

Thain ran the New York Stock Exchange between 2003 and 2007. His task when he took over at Merrill Lynch was to repair the disastrous balance sheet. One of his first acts was to arrange his extravagant office makeover. This was an extremely highly regarded man, an alumnus of MIT and Harvard Business School, known as “Mr Fix-it”. Is this the type of person that gets to the top of the tree in America? Is this what counts as talent and integrity? Is this what “fixing it” means? If so, is it any surprise that we are in such dire straits?

Thain, in the hours before Merrill Lynch was taken over by the Bank of America, made sure that bonus payments were rushed forward to ensure that highly paid employees in the failing investment bank got their cash before the takeover took place. Had the bonus payments taken place at the normal time, they would have been slashed to zero. He had no respect for the Bank of America, no respect for the government, and no respect for the public. This is the OWO in microcosm – always making sure they take care of themselves; always showing complete contempt for everyone else. People like Thain have ceased to inhabit the real world. They exist solely in the world of the OWO where they can get away with anything and no one ever tries to stop them.

Now consider Dennis Kozlowski, head of Tyco International. He had Tyco pay $30 million for his New York City apartment, including $6,000 shower curtains. He stole $150 million in unauthorised bonuses. He committed fraud against Tyco to the extent of $400 million. Kozlowski admitted that his pay package was “confusing” and “almost embarrassingly big”, but he strenuously denied that he had committed any crimes. Unusually, he was prosecuted and jailed. No doubt he had alienated his friends in the OWO and they abandoned him to his fate. The OWO dislike being embarrassed. When someone goes too far and gets caught, the OWO will not save them. There is no honour amongst thieves.

Todd Thomson, former head of wealth management at Citigroup, had a stunning view of Central Park from his 50th-floor Manhattan office. His boardroom had marble flooring, polished wood cabinets, a tropical fish-tank, Persian rugs, and an enormous wood-burning fireplace. It was so extravagant that it was nicknamed “Todd Mahal.” Scarcely anyone other than Thomson had access to it. Thomson had a corporate jet at his disposal. Returning from a Chinese business trip, he ejected other Citigroup executives from the jet so that he could be alone with CNBC’s Maria Bartiromo. This glamorous reporter was nicknamed the Money Honey.

Sir Fred Goodwin, knighted by the British Queen, former chief executive of the banking leviathan Royal Bank of Scotland, issued a writ against a newspaper when it published the following details:

1) Goodwin had wanted to build a private road from his HQ to the nearby airport so that he wouldn’t have to travel on a busy road with ordinary commuters.

2) He ordered a “scallop” kitchen to be built near his office. Goodwin did not succeed with his writ. He was nicknamed “Fred the Shred” because of the number of employees he had made redundant over the years. He was responsible for the catastrophic purchase of ABN Amro Bank. At the start of 2009, the share price of RBS had fallen more than 98% from its peak. The bank is now owned 70% by the British government, and may be fully nationalised. Goodwin reluctantly resigned.

Goodwin, commonly regarded as exceptionally arrogant, was described as “The World’s Worst Banker”. A major newspaper referred to him as a modern day villain who made millions then left the taxpayer to sort out the mess. He has never apologised. He was highly regarded by former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, and gave advice to the British Government’s regarding economic policy! Britain is now facing an unprecedented financial crisis. Jimmy Cayne, former chairman of Bear Stearns, liked to play golf on Fridays. He often used a helicopter to reach the golf course. When Bear Stearns was going into financial meltdown, Cayne was, naturally, on the golf course.

Insurance company AIG, receiving massive financial assistance from the U.S. taxpayer, sent 70 executives to the luxury St Regis Resort in California. Their tab for 7 days came to $440,000. As for Dick Fuld of Lehman Brothers, he was probably the worst of the lot. Four days before the bank went bankrupt, Fuld was trying to arrange $20 million in “special payments” for three senior executives who were about to leave the company. Fuld, the man who destroyed a venerable banking institution, was reputed to have received some $500 million in pay and bonuses while at the helm (not to mention hundreds of millions of dollars in stock options).

Fuld sold his $14m dollar mansion in Florida to his wife for $100 to hide his assets from litigants seeking compensation for his spectacular ineptitude. (There’s no chance of convicting this crook.) Fuld still has a huge property empire and a spectacular modern art collection. In the UK, four members of the unelected House of Lords were caught out in a sting operation by a newspaper. It appears that they take cash from lobbyists and, in exchange, they seek to amend legislation so that it will favour the interests of the lobbyists. One of the Lords says that he get £100,000 each time he assists companies in this way. He says it’s “cheap for what I do for them”. He told the undercover journalist, “You’ve got to whet my appetite to get me on board.” We all know what that means.

Britain, a nation that pretends to have little or no political corruption, is one of the most corrupt and Masonic nations on earth. Corruption is endemic and actually forms part of the system. It is so built into the fabric of Britain that it is almost invisible. America has also been hit by innumerable scandals involving lobbyists, politicians and corruption. It is par for the course in countries ruled by the OWO.

Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich saw no reason why he shouldn’t try to sell Barack Obama’s vacant U.S. Senate seat. In a phone call secretly recorded by the FBI, he said, “I’ve got this thing and it’s fucking golden, and, uh, uh, I’m just not giving it up for fuckin’ nothing. I’m not gonna do it.” The pigs think they can feed in the trough forever. The greed and arrogance of these people is without restraint. They believe they are a law unto themselves and that they can get away with anything. Frequently, they do. Only now and again is an example made of one or two of them. These people, and a few thousand others just like them, are the Old World Order who shape the direction of the world and who control governments and economies. They do not act in your interests, only in their own.

What are we going to do about it? Will we sit here forever and take no action? Will we keep electing presidents and prime ministers who are in their pocket and who do nothing to curb their excesses? Will we keep paying the price for their avarice and ineptitude? Are we the greatest suckers the world has ever seen?
__________

The Anti-OWO – Law Annual Disclosure List:

Is it possible to use legislation to begin the assault on the high fortresses of the Old World Order? A single “disclosure” Act would allow the people to see who is really running society. If the political will existed, it would be easy to detect whether nations such as America and Britain are being systematically manipulated in favour of certain privileged groups. Every year, a list of the 10,000 highest paid individuals in each nation should be published for public scrutiny. Each person on the list should be compelled to reveal a) which school/college/university they attended b) which religion they belong to c) if they belong to any secret societies and, if so, which ones d) any private clubs or organisations they belong to e) if they are related to, or are friends with, anyone else on the list, and, finally, how much tax they paid.

Of course, those who are conspiring against the people will not wish to participate in this exercise: lack of full disclosure is the best friend of those who wish to rig economic and political systems in their favour. But the top earners in our society have disproportionate influence, so should not their financial affairs and social connections be made visible to those over whom they wield their influence? The current financial crisis reminds us, if we had forgotten, that our economy is the plaything of investment bankers, CEOs and media moguls. None of these people are elected by the people, none of them are subject to the approval of the people. Isn’t it absurd that presidents and prime ministers are put under intense public scrutiny, yet the elite who have a decisive say over the direction of the nation aren’t publicly vetted at all?

The governments of many nations are now having to throw the people’s hard earned tax dollars at major institutions in a desperate attempt to remedy the catastrophic errors of wealthy and powerful bankers and CEOs. So, since the people are now massively indebted thanks to the disastrous misjudgements of a few thousand privileged individuals, shouldn’t the people be allowed to enquire into the backgrounds and financial details of those who have led them into recession and perhaps Depression? Shouldn’t this now be an ongoing requirement so that we are never again duped by the privileged elite? If a President has his life pored over by the public, why shouldn’t the masters of the universe of Wall Street? Why are they allowed to wield power over the economy without being accountable to the people? We know why – because it’s in their interests to avoid the searching eye of public scrutiny. They carry out their deals in secret.

They decide what they should be paid in secret. The last thing they want is for the people to be involved in their clandestine affairs. Imagine it were conclusively demonstrated, as many suspect, that the top 10,000 pay virtually no tax thanks to their offshore accounts and tax avoidance schemes. Imagine it were conclusively demonstrated, as many suspect, that America is run by Ivy League graduates, and Britain by Oxbridge graduates. Was it intended by the Founding Fathers that America should be ruled by the privileged Ivy League gang? Why should certain institutions be permitted to possess disproportionate power? Are your chances in life wrecked if you do not go to an elite school? What kind of system produces such an outcome?

The first weapon to be deployed against the Old World Order should be the one that ensures that they are brought out into the open and everyone can see what they are up to. The essence of their power lies in the strength of the secretive networks they have established to exclude the mass of people, and to allow them to reach mutually rewarding decisions that are never in the interests of the people. Once they can no longer conceal themselves, their power will wane.

Naturally, even if such an Act were introduced, the OWO would refuse to cooperate. But why would any government committed to ruling in the name of the people not wish to implement such a disclosure Act? The people merely wish to know the identities, connections and backgrounds of those who are running their society. Don’t they have an absolute right, in a democracy, to that information? Shouldn’t it be a matter of course for governments to reveal to the people who are the most financially influential people in the nation? Everyone knows the simple equation around which the world revolves: money = power.

Not to fully disclose the wealth of the top 10,000 individuals is to announce that power should be concealed from the people. How could any member of the electorate tolerate such a system? We must have full visibility of those who take the decisions that shape the lives of so many of us. It is natural justice.
__________

The Female Conundrum:

Few women are interested in conspiracy theories. Only a small number of women are in the Old World Order. By the same token, only a small number of women are members of the Illuminati, and they have backgrounds in masculine subjects such as science, mathematics, and philosophy. How can women’s lack of engagement with conspiracy theories be explained?

******

The Perfect Prison.

In the latter half of the 20th century, the Old World Order turned to psychological manipulation to extend their control over the world. The best prison is the one that requires no guards – where people walk into the cells without any fuss and lock themselves in. It takes immense resources to create a physically oppressive regime full of guards, barbed wire, checkpoints and roadblocks. In the Big Brother society envisaged by George Orwell in his dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, citizens were monitored round the clock.

But how would you keep 300 million Americans under constant surveillance? If a person worked an eight hour surveillance shift then it would require three people (taking no breaks) to cover a 24-hr period of continually monitoring one person. 900 million people would be required to watch the 300 million Americans at all times. Where will the 900 million come from? And who will watch the watchers? And if everyone’s watching everyone else, who’s doing any work? Very quickly, the model breaks down. The reality is that surveillance operations performed by the CIA, MI5 etc are extremely expensive and only a tiny number of people can realistically be monitored. It doesn’t matter how many satellites there are or how many CCTV cameras are trained on you. 99.99% of the time, no one’s watching.

After WWII, the Old World Order realised that tyranny had become unworkable. It simply didn’t make economic sense. Their brilliant insight was that people could be rendered harmless by giving them things they wanted. And what people wanted above all was fantasy, escapism, a refuge from reality. Advertising, TV, Hollywood, glitzy magazines – they all portray a world and lifestyle that is infinitely glittering and seductive to many people.

Once people are slaves to the fake world, they never want to leave. They are addicts, with a desperate craving for the glamour so lacking in their real lives. The online world Second Life gives people the opportunity to create an idealised, fantasy avatar of themselves that inhabits the sort of world in which they would like to live for real. Are these Second Lifers the sort of people likely to be pursuing the truth, challenging the Old World Order, breaking out of their prison? These people will never rebel as long as they get their fantasy fix. If you are getting things that you think you want, you have no feeling that you are anything but free: the bars of your jail are invisible. The Old World Order do not seek to put us in concentration camps but in jails that we can’t see because we have been so brainwashed and deceived.

David Riesman wrote in The Lonely Crowd (1950): “‘Conspiracy’ theories of popular culture are quite old, summed up as they are in the concept of ‘bread and circuses’. In ‘The Breadline and the Movies’ Thorstein Veblen presented a more sophisticated concept, namely, that the modern American masses paid the ruling class for the privilege of the very entertainments that helped to keep them under the laughing gas.” The last statement is critical: “…the modern American masses paid the ruling class for the privilege of the very entertainments that helped to keep them under the laughing gas.”

To put it another way, the masses pay the Old World Order to continually sedate them with mindless junk that makes them incapable of resisting the Old World Order. This is genius. You get your victims to pay for their own enslavement. Not only do you not have to pay a fortune to subjugate your victims, they pay you. That is the world we live in now. And who are the biggest victims? Women.

In women’s magazines there’s never a word about science, history, economics, politics, philosophy, religion, technology. Nor are conspiracy theories ever mentioned. Women’s magazines are all about physical appearance, health issues, accessories, houses, holidays, fashion, style, diets, gossip and celebrities. Who’s fat, who’s thin, who’s pretty, who’s ugly, who’s wearing what, who’s up, who’s down, who are the new stars, what are the old stars doing? Women’s magazines are the sanctification of trivia. They are devoid of intelligent thought. Sex and the City – one of the most popular women’s TV shows of recent years – is a story of career women with expensive shoes. That’s it! They moan about men, but are obsessed with getting Mr Right. After decades of feminism, women are still locked in the frivolous, intellectually sterile world of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, published almost two hundred years ago.

The Old World Order have come up with the perfect formula for neutralising women: “retail therapy.” Give ordinary women a shop to visit and a credit card to brandish and they will be docile, obedient consumers, never posing any problems.

Riesman said, “The other-directed person wants to be loved rather than esteemed; he wants not to gull or impress, let alone oppress, others, but, in the current phase, to relate to them; he seeks less a snobbish status in the eyes of others than assurance of being emotionally in tune with them.” Is that not a definition of most women? Is that not a description of most office workers? Is that not a description of users of social networking sites? We live in an other-directed society, one where most people are scared to deviate from the normal, the average. “Fitting in” is imperative. Few people have the courage to be themselves. To be interested in conspiracy theories, you have to be prepared for conflict. Them and Us. The Enemy. You have no desire to “relate” to those oppressing you. It is impossible for other-directed people – women in particular – to be attracted to conspiracy theories. They would rather go shopping.

Women are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome – complete sympathy with the people who have taken them hostage. Think how easy the world is for the OWO when they get people to actively embrace being their victims. Do you see how difficult it is to overthrow the Old World Order? They are not crude, stupid bullies – as they are so often portrayed – but smart, sophisticated mind manipulators. And what’s their most successful tactic? – supplying the people with unimportant things that they want. What woman feels oppressed when she has just bought a designer dress? Will she rise up against the Old World Order? Not in a million years.

In many ways, women are the key to overthrowing the Old World Order. Tragically, they are the least likely to care about the tyranny of the OWO. They are shopaholics and gossip addicts, and no conceivable threat to the OWO. Which is exactly as the OWO planned.

One of the Illuminati’s main missions is to make women wake up.
__________

Meritocracy:

The Illuminati have always supported a meritocratic form of government. If you wish a brief introduction to meritocracy and rival political systems, we recommend the following excellent article by Wes Penre: http://www.illuminati-news.com/government-for-thepeople.html

Like Wes, we advocate a Republic that applies meritocratic principles. He has presented the case exceptionally well. Isn’t it time to start thinking beyond democracy? Isn’t it time for a better society? We have seen democracy in action and it has failed to deliver. Only a fool would keep faith with a proven error.
__________

The Greed Virus:

The Illuminati are opposed to monarchies, autocracies, dictatorships and oligarchies. But what about democracy? Why would the Illuminati oppose democratic government? The Illuminati believe that a high-calibre, well-educated, well-informed, autonomous people cannot be deceived by their leaders, and such a people represents the best means to ensure that the government governs in the name of the people and for the people.

Democracy – supposedly government of the people, by the people, and for the people – is a disguised oligarchy. A small, elite group govern in their own interests and take active steps to dupe the people, to provide misinformation and disinformation, to exploit the power of their office to disguise their many abuses. It is advantageous to them to maintain the people in a state akin to that of a flock of sheep or a herd of cows – docile, unthinking, easily controlled, lacking initiative, incapable of resisting.

Democracy, in practice, is government of the people, by the elite and for the elite. It is the perfect instrument of control for the Old World Order. The people, brainwashed by relentless propaganda about “freedom and democracy”, sedated by junk food, junk entertainment and junk culture, and starved of the sort of education that will furnish them with incisive, critical minds, do not know how to see through the lies. They are born suckers being taken for a perpetual ride.

Democracy becomes viable only at the point at which the vast majority of citizens are highly capable, clever, and resourceful. At that point, democracy and meritocracy intersect and become synonymous. Until that point, the most meritorious people in society must be placed in charge. How does that happen? An example already exists from history – America.

The Illuminati had hoped to achieve worldwide meritocracy via Masonic Lodges – groups of talented, educated individuals all over the world who did not subscribe to the prevailing elitist, oppressive regimes and their mainstream religions of control. For a while, Freemasonry did exactly what was intended, and the foundation of the American nation was its greatest success. All of the significant players in the creation of America were Freemasons. In the crisis of the American Revolution, the American people turned to the best amongst them – the Founding Fathers. But the dream turned to a nightmare and before long Freemasons began to resemble the elitist rulers they had once opposed.

Anyone who has read George Orwell’s Animal Farm will recognise the process. The animals, led by the pigs, ousted their human oppressors, but by the end of the novel, the pigs were fraternising with their old human masters: “The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.” Thus it was with the Freemasons and the Old World Order.

The Illuminati now repudiate Freemasonry, but still support meritocracy, with one crucial refinement. The Freemasons were corrupted by greed, and greed remains the most effective weapon of the Old World Order. So greed, in a meritocracy, must be the strongest taboo. While no one should be ashamed of earning higher rewards for being talented and hardworking, they must not succumb to the greed of the Old World Order or they will follow the example of the pigs in Animal Farm.

The Illuminati’s brand of meritocracy now comes with a commitment to limit the rewards of the most successful. Could anyone on earth complain if they were not permitted to earn more than, say, one million dollars a year? If the average person is earning fifty thousand dollars a year then a million dollars represents twenty times the average. If you’re convinced you deserve more than twenty times the average, shouldn’t you begin to suspect the greed virus has infected you?

Look at AIG in America. Top executives were still expecting to be paid huge bonuses despite the disastrous performance and virtual collapse of this company. Only people who have contempt for merit would think they merit any reward in these circumstances. They should have been relieved they weren’t being prosecuted and jailed.

Edward Liddy, the AIG chairman, said he could not “attract and retain the best and brightest talent if employees believe that their compensation is subject to continued and arbitrary adjustment by the US Treasury”. Who are these brightest talents? The same ones who required a gargantuan bail out by the taxpayers? You see what happens under the Old World Order – words like “merit” begin to resemble their opposite. The Old World Order continue to play their game, continue to think they can make fools of the people. They are so used to having their snouts in the trough they cannot imagine a world where the trough is no longer there.

And what of the response of the Obama government? Larry Summers, the president’s chief economic adviser, said: “We are a country of law. There are contracts. The government cannot just abrogate contracts.”

America is the nation whose citizens famously said, “No taxation without representation.” Are the citizens of this same nation now going to say that they will be party to contracts that were drawn up without any consultation with them, in which their interests were not represented? The people now own AIG in all but name. All contracts that existed before are now automatically rescinded because the people were not involved in drawing them up. That is what America fought for! Already, the Obama regime, despite its rhetoric, is showing how it will never challenge the power of the Old World Order. Isn’t it time for something new? Isn’t it time for meritocracy? A meritocratic government would never hesitate to strip failures of unmerited rewards. That’s the whole point of meritocracy: only success is rewarded. The money trough will be removed from the Old World Order forever, and with the trough goes their power.
__________

Ayn Rand:

The Old World Order see themselves as the finest specimens the human race has to offer. The world scarcely deserves them, in their opinion. It is only right that they are extravagantly rewarded for their “brilliance”. Without them, they say, the world would fall apart. It is the natural order for them to be the masters and for everyone else to serve their needs. They find it inconceivable that anyone would object to their rule and complain about their excessive wealth and power. Their delusions are almost infinite. And behind them stand the ultimate puppet masters, feeding their egomania and urging them on to ever greater heights of selfishness and greed.

One writer/philosopher released a novel that the Old World Order now view as their supreme intellectual and moral justification. That book is Ayn Rand’s notorious Atlas Shrugged, published in 1957. Any expression of support for this book should be taken for what it is – an explicit endorsement of the Old World Order, of the world of privileged elites trampling over the rights of everyone else. Ayn Rand (originally Alyssa Rosenbaum) was born in 1905 in Tsarist Russia to a well-off Jewish family. In 1925, she secured a visa to visit American relatives, and never returned to Russia (which had overthrown the tyrannical Tsarist regime in 1917 and brought Rand’s privileged world to an end, to her disgust).

Atlas Shrugged asks the question what would happen to the world if the global elite – the Old World Order (Rand doesn’t use this term, but it’s exactly what she means) – went on strike. Her conclusion is that the world would collapse. The world, Rand maintained, was full of “parasites”, “looters” and “moochers” – the people who envy, resent and resist the OWO, and try to take, often by force (allegedly), what rightfully belongs to the OWO elite. Rand’s worldview is so obnoxious that she has been branded as one of the most evil figures of modern intellectual history. That reputation is fully deserved.

Rand was a fanatical advocate of unregulated, unrestrained free markets. “The market is infallible” was her mantra. We know exactly where Rand’s worldview gets us – the financial crisis we are enduring right now. For the last thirty years, the Old World Order have been able to do whatever they liked in terms of the “free market”. No controls were imposed, no brakes applied. We had unregulated markets in full flow – leading to the current disaster that has cost millions of people their jobs and livelihoods: it’s the “parasites, moochers and looters” i.e. the hardworking taxpayers of the world who are picking up the OWO’s tab.

The truth, of course, is the opposite of what Rand says. The Old World Order are not the agents of freedom and well-being but of global collapse. The ordinary people are having their massive potential ignored in order to feed the vanity of the few. Nothing is more unjust and inefficient than rule by narrow, corrupt elites. Atlas Shrugged ends thus: “‘The road is cleared,’ said Galt. ‘We are going back to the world.’ He raised his hand and over the desolate earth he traced in space the sign of the dollar.”

This is perhaps the only book ever written that ends with the word “dollar”. This book is nothing but the sanctification of earthly wealth. Rand called herself an atheist but in fact she worshipped Mammon, the god of this earth, the god of riches for the few. She detested the English folk hero Robin Hood who took from the greedy rich to give to the needy poor. Rand and her supporters are monsters. We do not want these people to go “back to the world.” The world is better off without them. Only when the greedy are ostracised can a meritocracy arise and ordinary people get the opportunities they have always been denied by the rich elites that Rand deifies.

It comes as no surprise to us that a group calling itself the “Illuminati Order” has set up a website in which it seeks to recruit freethinkers to Ayn Rand’s philosophy. It is because of false groups like this, deliberately created by the enemy to discredit us, that the Illuminati’s reputation has become so sinister in the public consciousness. In Ayn Rand’s philosophy, tyrannical rule by monarchs is replaced by tyrannical rule by the super-rich. On their site, the “Illuminati Order” direct interested parties to a collection of Rand’s essays entitled The Virtue of Selfishness. The title says it all. Selfishness is the antithesis of what the real Illuminati stand for. Grand Master Adam Weishaupt would be appalled to know his name is being linked to a group that supports everything he fought against.

Rand’s most famous disciple of recent times is none other than Alan Greenspan, former Chairman of the Federal Reserve, leading member of the Old World Order and one of the key architects of the current credit crunch that has wrecked the lives of so many. The last thing the world needs are the mad disciples of Ayn Rand.
__________

The Last Bling King:

We gave a ghostwriter a simple brief – to write a philosophical, political novel that turned Atlas Shrugged on its head and showed the ordinary people going on strike and refusing to serve the interests of the Old World Order. How would the masters of the universe cope when no one obeyed them any longer? The book represents, in a sense, the sort of velvet revolution that the Illuminati hope to use to bring about an end to the tyranny of the Old World Order. It involves the destruction of celebrity culture – the glamorous and seductive face of the Old World Order that conceals the repulsive reality.

The Last Bling King: how ordinary men and women rose up against celebrities and the super-rich, became the people they wanted to be, and changed the world forever. The Last Bling King: can fame be switched off? A group of revolutionaries have concocted an ingenious plan and they’ve targeted the most glittering occasion of the celebrity calendar: Oscar Night. The Last Bling King: the antidote to Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand’s best-selling paean to greed and wealth. It’s not the privileged elite who go on strike this time…it’s the decent, solid, ordinary people, without whom the world would be nothing.

Blurb for The Last Bling King.

Greg Raslow is disappointed with life. He’s envious of the rich and famous and thinks his life is meaningless. He’s not alone. But, from nowhere, a mysterious organisation with no identifiable leaders emerges to stand up for ordinary people. The League for the Liberation of Nobodies wear uniforms made from old newspapers. It’s an ironic reference to the fact that there are never any stories about them: they’re invisible in the eyes of the media, to whom only celebrities count. Greg joins the League and finds himself in the midst of a mind-boggling revolution. Soon, the super-rich and celebrities are on the run, desperately trying to protect their privileged lives as they find that ordinary people have finally turned against them. You can have all the wealth and fame in the world, but if no one will serve you in a restaurant or a shop, what’s the point? The League inveigle Greg into the luxury residence of “Dosh and Rex”, the most famous celebrity couple on earth.

The League never tell Greg what his mission is, and gradually he finds himself feeling sorry for the couple as they retreat ever deeper into their bunker. Their best friend is John Galt, the world’s richest man, and Galt uses all of his wealth and influence to fight a desperate rear-guard action against the League. When he meets a horrific death, the League’s victory seems complete. But an unexpected discovery makes Greg realise that there’s something suspicious about the League and their unseen leaders. When he starts investigating, he uncovers the most audacious plot in history. Only one man on earth can stop it. Greg’s about to meet him and undergo the ultimate life changing experience.

Let the Revolution begin.

******

Soma Sema.

“The body is the tomb of the soul.”

The jail is not only of others’ construction. We help to build it. And we can smash it.

Follow the path of Illumination. Seek the Light. Become Enlightened. Become everything you have it in you to be.

We are the Illuminati. We are the rebellion against the gaolers. We are the path to the True Light. Hue! Cue!
__________

4/9

Below the level of the OWO are a group of people called the Gatekeepers. They are agents and middlemen; those who take a healthy cut of every transaction. They are parasites. They inflate the market so that their cut grows. They are editors, publishers, producers, talent scouts, advertisers, marketers, fashion setters, commentators, head-hunters, recruitment consultants, political lobbyists, gallery proprietors etc.

Gatekeepers are those who set the tone for society. They decide what books get published, what art gets shown, what movies get made, what articles appear in newspapers and magazines. They choose which stories to highlight and which to bury. They decide whom the media should ridicule and whom they should protect. They take political positions. They promote certain agendas. They ensure that only the “right” people get through the doors. Gatekeepers, like the OWO, are usually Jewish or Masonic. They are well off, well connected, the public face of the establishment. They are mostly educated at private schools and elite colleges and universities. Often, they are related to members of the Old World Order. They are a filter between the people and the OWO.

They look after their own. They invariably favour people who come from similar backgrounds, hold similar views and have similar tastes to themselves. It comes so naturally to them that often they don’t even realise they’re doing it. If you’re not in the “in-crowd”, you should resign yourself to remaining forever in the “out-crowd”. The Gatekeepers are an anti-meritocratic force. They are mired in nepotism and cronyism. They must be swept aside.
__________

The Treasury:

The Old World Order have attempted to portray the irresistible rise of Goldman Sachs as the epitome of the American Dream: a poor immigrant (Goldman) comes to America and within a few years is wildly successful, running a vastly influential bank. If you believe that fantasy, you’ll believe anything. Goldman was a senior figure in an ancient secret society called The Treasury that traces its origins to the time of Moses. The Treasury’s plan is a simple one: to control wealth. Wealth is power and those with the most wealth are the most powerful. That was true in Moses’ day and it is true now. The Treasury was intent on learning everything it could about wealth: how to get it, how to exploit it, how to use it to manipulate people, how to use it to extend its power, how to undermine enemies and hostile powers, how to make itself invulnerable.

Goldman was sent to America, with his ludicrous cover story of being a heroic immigrant, tasked with setting up a banking Leviathan that would be capable of bringing the Treasury’s grandest dream to fruition: the complete control of the entire wealth of the world. That, in effect, is what the world banking system is, and Goldman Sachs takes pride of place. The world’s banks are not there to benefit the people of the world but to advance the interests of the Treasury and the greater organisation of which they are the financial wing: the Old World Order, the tightly knit set of dynastic families that dominate our world. These are the notorious “bloodlines” that are often discussed in online forums. First amongst them is the Rothschild family, the Satanic heart of the Old World Order.

Consider these facts. Goldman’s son-in-law was Samuel Sachs, another member of the German-Jewish mafia that installed itself in America. Sachs was a close friend of another person of German-Jewish stock, Philip Lehman (a partner in Lehman Brothers). Intermarriage among the German-Jewish elite was common. Nepotism was rife. Many partners in major investment banks were closely related by blood and marriage. And this is supposed to lead to healthy competition and no conflict of interest, is it? What a joke. The investment banks are – and always have been – a cartel run by The Treasury to serve its interests. They are the beating heart of the Old World Order.

German Jews in America provided the financial strength of the Old World Order, but they needed another group to give them access to political power, to status, prestige and the highest levels of society. That other group was the Freemasons, consisting almost entirely of wealthy WASPs – White Anglo Saxon Protestants. (Virtually every American president has been a wealthy WASP.) That unholy alliance endures to this day and is stronger than ever. Protestant Christian fundamentalists are the most vocal supporters of the state of Israel. The American nation is a slavish and uncritical supporter of Israel even though it is counter-productive for American foreign policy and brings it into ruinous conflict with Muslim nations. 9/11 happened because of America’s relationship with Israel. So what does America get out of this relationship? – nothing but misery and hate. But the close relationship keeps the powerful Jewish lobby sweet.

The following is a list of prominent Jews in the financial world: http://jewprom.50webs.com/JewPromSite_files/sheet045.htm

That website also shows prominent Jews in many other fields, including a long list of billionaires. If a similar list existed for prominent Freemasons, it would just about be possible for anyone reading the list to compile the names of all 6,000 members of the Old World Order. The OWO is a Jewish/Masonic conspiracy. The dreadful irony for the Illuminati is that they gave birth to Freemasonry. But it should be emphasised that the OWO seized control of Freemasonry from the Illuminati by using the oldest trick in the book – bribery and corruption. Freemasonry was intended to bring about a great spiritual renaissance in humanity. Now it is a squalid empire of greed. That illustrates the scale of the task confronting the Illuminati in their struggle to overthrow the OWO. Even their own creations can fall prey to the OWO.

Before the advent of Freemasonry, the OWO was composed of the European aristocracy and their Jewish financiers. But as the power of the aristocracy seemed to be on the wane because of the growing power of parliaments and the merchant class, the aristocrats realised they needed a new way to maintain their position. A secret organisation consisting of well-educated professionals and merchants proved perfect for their purposes. The aristocrats used their status and wealth to seduce their way into the Masonic lodges and soon became the masters. The ordinary Masons were dazzled by being allowed to mix in the highest ranks of society and rapidly succumbed to greed, nepotism and cronyism. To this day, the nauseating British Royal Family hold most of the highest positions in Freemasonry.

The aristocrats believe that everyone has their price. Do you have your price? The Illuminati welcome only those who can never be bought. There are all too few of such people. Look at the modus operandi of the Old World Order in the present day. Rich banks like Goldman Sachs, full of wealthy Jews, hire Ivy League preppies – the children of high-ranking Freemasons. They select MBA students from all the most prestigious business schools. No one else gets a look in. No one else is eligible. The OWO is strictly for Jews and Masons, the unholiest of alliances. (Prominent Catholics, despite their historical differences with Protestantism and Freemasonry, are now fully on-board with the Masonic agenda. So are most of the richest Muslims, particularly those of Saudi Arabia.) But their day is coming to an end.

How can you contribute to the overthrow of the Old World Order? The task is one of psychology. It involves the waging of a “war of signs”. (This concept is discussed in the book The Last Bling King by Mike Hockney.) It amounts to associating “negative” signs with an entity until that entity becomes repulsive to the vast majority of people. At that point, the entity, no matter how powerful it once was, is rendered impotent. Can ordinary people use their creativity to associate a plethora of negativity with Goldman Sachs, to make it the physical manifestation of the unacceptable face of capitalism? It will be the face on every poster, the face that the whole world will come to loathe. The game is to make Goldman Sachs a pariah organisation, the uncoolest place on earth at which to work. Every employee and partner will, bit by bit, be made to feel like lepers in the community. They will be ostracised and despised. No one at a party will ever admit to working for that organisation. The government will be too scared to appoint anyone who ever worked for that firm to any influential position. Drop by drop, its lifeblood will drain away.

Make YouTube videos mocking and criticising Goldman Sachs. Write letters of complaint about them to your politicians. Email media companies with negative comments about Goldman Sachs. Run Facebook campaigns against them. Protest outside their offices. Blog against them. Post anti Goldman Sachs messages on online forums. Arrange flash mobs outside their office every day. Use your creativity. Rather than wasting your time poking people on Facebook, posting pointless shit, or twittering about the sandwich you just ate, think of a strategy for toppling the most evil bank in the world. The bosses of Goldman Sachs think the world is powerless against them. Let’s prove them wrong.

Don’t delude yourselves that the American President will be coming to your aid. Who was Obama’s first Chief of Staff? – Rahm Emanuel, a leading figure in the Jewish community. Who is Emanuel’s brother? – Ari Emanuel, a super-agent and major player in Hollywood. Why does that not seem remotely surprising? The White House and Hollywood combined in one family – the political message and the Hollywood propaganda to sell it. “With Ari, it’s all about the bottom line,” said Jewish writer Aaron Sorkin, a client of Emanuel and creator of the television drama The West Wing. “In a business deal, he’s going to try to kill for you, and it’s just going to be about putting as much money in your pocket as he can, until you tell him that there’s something else that’s important to you.” Yes, that sounds like the sort of thing a monster of greed would proudly say.

The character Josh Lyman in The West Wing is reputedly based on Rahm Emanuel. Yes, why not get a group of Jewish friends together and let them all write about each other and promote the careers of each other on prime time TV? The father of the Emanuel brothers was a member of the ultra-Zionist terrorist organisation Irgun. Perhaps someone should mention that the next time the White House condemns Islamic terrorism.

Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook, is Jewish. So is Larry Elison, founder of Oracle. So are Sergey Brin and Larry Page, the founders of Google. So is Max Levchin, founder of PayPal. (So are many of the Russian oligarchs who plundered the resources of the former Soviet Union.) Think of the power wielded by these people. Think of their influence over the internet. Here’s the reality. If a smart kid from a poor, ordinary family has a great idea, he has no one to support him. His friends scoff at him. No one can lend him any money. The banks sneer at him. He has no network, no money, no support. His idea withers and dies. But it’s a completely different situation when a bright young Jew or clever preppie Freemason (like Bill Gates) has a good idea. They immediately plug into their network of support. They quickly raise capital. A whole organisation of help is rapidly deployed to bring the project to fruition. Then the world stands back, applauds and calls these people geniuses…

But they’re not. They benefit from a huge helping hand unavailable to others. They are the children of privilege. They have all the right calling cards to succeed. Zuckerberg, for example, was no outsider. He was from a well-off Jewish family and he was attending one of the best and most prestigious universities on earth. If you can’t succeed given such support, there’s something wrong with you. The mystery is why anyone buys into the myth that these privileged people who simply make the most of their privileges are somehow admirable. Approximately 5,300,000 Americans are Jewish, representing about 1.7% of the total American population and roughly 36% of the Jewish population of the world. It is estimated that there are between 13.2 and 18 million Jews in the world. They represent a tiny fraction of the world’s population, yet they exercise massive influence. The Netherlands in Europe has a population of 16.5 million people. It is a highly intelligent, cultured, peaceful, stable nation that once controlled a global trading empire, yet it has nothing like the influence over the world that the Jewish Diaspora does. Why not? Because virtually no Dutch people belong to the Old World Order. They are not part of the huge machine of influence, wealth and power that propels the Jewish people forward.

The Illuminati have a number of members from Jewish backgrounds, but they all repudiate Judaism and they are appalled by the degree of mutual back scratching and nepotism that prominent Jews engage in so enthusiastically. Einstein, one of the finest Jews in history, said, “Try not to become a man of success but a man of value.” It’s a tragedy that most Jews want to be men of Mammon.

It’s important to make a point about anti-Semitism since that accusation is quickly made when anyone says anything critical about any Jewish person. An anti-Semite is someone who wishes ill against someone for no other reason than that person is Jewish. However, is it anti-Semitic to be opposed to those Jews who are part of a conspiracy against the citizens of the world? The purpose of branding people anti-Semitic for expressing negative remarks about greedy shysters who happen to be Jewish is to shut down discussion and anathematise those who made the comments. It’s an old and tired tactic.

If no one speaks out, the conspiracy will never be broken. Ordinary people must have courage. Don’t let rich Jews shout you down. Don’t let rich Freemasons shout you down. Don’t let any rich person of any stripe shout you down. Those who conspire against the people have no rights.
__________

The British Disease:

Britain is one of the most divided, class obsessed nations in the developed world. Inequality and greed are rife. Social mobility is rapidly going into reverse despite the fact that an allegedly centre-left party was recently in power for 13 years in a row. Lord Peter Mandelson, probably the most powerful politician in Britain during those years (even more powerful than the two Labour prime ministers), publicly said he was “intensely relaxed about people becoming filthy rich”. He himself is filthy rich. Mandelson is Jewish and exceptionally well connected with a host of other wealthy Jews and Freemasons. (He is a close friend of the Rothschild Family and often stays at the luxury holiday estate of Lord Jacob Rothschild in Corfu.) Bear in mind that this man represented a party that a couple of decades ago was explicitly socialist and believed in the redistribution of wealth to give ordinary people a realistic chance in life. Which left-wing person would ever call himself “Lord” and cultivate the friendship of the Rothschild family, one of the richest and most privileged families on earth?

You could not imagine two people less socialist in their outlooks than Peter Mandelson and former Labour Party Prime Minister Tony Blair. The “New Labour” Party created by Mandelson, Blair and former Prime Minister Gordon Brown, has nothing in common with the original Labour Party. In other words, a left-wing party has been hijacked by right-wingers and completely neutralised as a threat to the rich. This perfectly demonstrates the way the OWO work. Their conspiracy takes place right under the noses of the people and no one notices. A political movement gets taken over and no one says a thing. In fact the people even vote for the new party. That illustrates how brainwashed the people are, how well the gatekeepers have softened them up.

Britain is a fractured nation. A huge underclass has evolved, violent, feral, constantly intoxicated and mired in crime. All around the country, deep unease is growing. Gated communities are springing up everywhere. No one trusts anyone else. Everyone looks to their own interests and ignores the rest of their community. The whole concept of community is dying. People are increasingly ruthless, uncaring and lacking in compassion. Everyone is out for themselves. The gap between rich and poor is widening at a bewildering rate. The super-rich are buying themselves out of society. They are moving into the rarefied air of the world of the gods. “Nothing is enough for a person for whom enough is too little,” is what ordinary people say of the super greedy.

The poor are dispossessed, powerless and increasingly afraid. They see no future. Just seven percent of British children are privately educated, but 75 percent of judges, 70 percent of finance directors, 55 percent of solicitors, 53 percent of CEOs, 53 percent of journalists, 50 percent of medics, and 38 percent of politicians come from that background, and it’s getting worse. If you’re not “one of us”, you don’t stand a prayer of getting any of the best jobs in Britain. The OWO control practically every significant job.

The book The Millionaires’ Death Club by Mike Hockney illustrates the world of the OWO. A group of exceptionally rich, arrogant and privileged students – on their way to senior roles in the OWO – are a law unto themselves. They are contemptuous of ordinary people and think they can get away with anything, even murder. One of the ancient initiation ceremonies of the Illuminati is described in the book. That same ceremony has been appropriated in real life by the Skull and Bones secret society at Yale. Many symbols and ceremonies of the Illuminati have found their way, via Freemasonry (which was the creation of the Illuminati), to modern Masonic societies. These similarities are then cited as “proof” that the Illuminati are the ultimate puppet masters. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Illuminati are freedom fighters, seeking to liberate humanity from the yoke of the OWO.

Many people who claim to despise the rich, privileged elites would succumb to them if they were ever invited to join the in-crowd. The Millionaires’ Death Club is about an impressionable person being offered that very chance. What would you do if they opened the door to you?
__________

Goldman Sucks:

Something truly extraordinary has happened. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Goldman Sachs, the greedy, grasping, Midas heart of the Old World Order, with fraud, prompting an immediate slump of over 12% in their share price. For once, the victims of the evil empire of Goldman Sachs were not the ordinary people, but their own big clients, including the German bank IKB. This is a momentous hour. Like rats in a sack, the Old World Order have viciously turned on each other. Their united front is disintegrating. How did it come about? What did Goldman Sachs do that was so outrageous that the SEC could no longer turn a blind eye to the myriad of transactions performed by Goldman Sachs that should have attracted the most serious scrutiny long ago?

What happened was that the hedge fund Paulson & Co, one of the most spectacular beneficiaries of the Credit Crunch, earning billions of dollars while so many other were losing billions, put together a complex portfolio of subprime-mortgage-backed investments that it fully expected to slump in value i.e. it was actually assembling a collection of what it thought were the highest risk, most dubious investments available, and anticipating maximum downside on this portfolio. Its explicit strategy was to bet heavily against this portfolio i.e. to “short” it to the fullest extent. In other words, Paulson & Co regarded this portfolio as utterly toxic, a disaster in the making. This portfolio was “dead man walking” if ever there was one.

Paulson & Co arranged for Goldman Sachs to structure, market and sell this portfolio to its prestigious clients. Goldman Sachs gave it the full, glossy treatment, indicating to many clients that they would be sitting on a potential goldmine if they invested in this portfolio. They completely omitted to mention to all would-be clients that Paulson & Co regarded this portfolio as a collection of the walking dead – a zombie fund heading for the graveyard. Isn’t this a critical piece of information about which every potential client ought to have been made aware? It’s a bit like selling a house for full market value when you know it’s sitting on the edge of a crumbling cliff, a fact that you deliberately fail to tell the purchaser.

In fact, they didn’t mention Paulson & Co at all. They claimed instead that ACA Management, an objective, independent third party with expertise in analysing risk, had assembled the portfolio. They must have known that if they had admitted the involvement of Paulson & Co, investors might have viewed it entirely differently, given the reputation of hedge funds. The Goldman Sachs “vice president” at the heart of the scandal was a Frenchman called Fabrice Tourre. In an email sent to a friend a month before he helped to structure the toxic portfolio, Tourre said, “More and more leverage in the system. The whole building is about to collapse anytime now … Only potential survivor, the fabulous Fabrice Tourre … standing in the middle of all these complex, highly leveraged, exotic trades he created without necessarily understanding all of the implication of those monstrosities!!!”

Tourre was described as a “well-mannered, handsome guy from a very refined family.” He had a reputation for throwing noisy parties in his fashionable block of flats. He was a ‘straight-A’ student at the Lycee Henri IV, one of France’s most elite schools, housed in an exquisite 6th Century abbey in Paris. He then studied mathematics at the Ecole Centrale Paris, a top French university, before completing his elite education with the obligatory trip to the USA where he obtained a master’s degree from Stanford. He worked in a luxurious office in a prime location in London. A Wall Street insider said, “This is the most cynical scheme I ever saw. Tourre was very aggressive about trying to make the assets look better than they were.” Tourre was described as being “in his element.”

The portfolio tanked in value in a matter of months, costing major European banks a fortune – some $1bn in total. It is almost beyond belief that Goldman Sachs thought it could get away with this. Its defence was that it was selling a sophisticated product to sophisticated investors, and it was up to them to perform any necessary checks (just as someone buying a house should always get a surveyor to check a property). Goldman Sachs, under the command of Lloyd Blankfein, is now exposed as having favoured a major hedge fund client over other major clients. One can well imagine that Goldman Sachs and Paulson & Co have very tight links of one sort or another.

John Paulson, founder of Paulson & Co, personally earned 2.3 billion in 2008. He was only the fourth best-paid hedge fund manager in the world. In 2007, Paulson earned $3.7bn. How much money does this man need?

The top 25 American hedge fund managers earn an average of $1bn per annum. Their total salary could pay for 658,000 teachers earning $38,000 per annum, and educate 13 million children. But, of course, the hedge fund managers would prefer to keep the money for themselves. Of what possible interest is the education of 13 million children to them? “I’m all right – so screw the whole world!” is their mantra. Isn’t it time America turned round to them and said, “No, screw you,” and took all their money away from them? It’s not as if hedge fund managers actually do anything productive. They are speculators and parasites who destabilize the world economy. What kind of economic system is it that allows these people to flourish and be celebrated? It’s an economy of the damned, an Evil Empire of unrestrained greed and selfishness, the economic system of a mental asylum. Think about it: 13 million educated children or 25 billionaire speculators; a meritocracy or capitalism? You choose.

“The chief value of money lies in the fact that one lives in a world in which it is over-estimated.” –H L Mencken

It’s time for humanity to stop being ruled by money. It’s time for the vast majority to start dictating to the tiny minority. From now on, they will do our bidding, not we theirs. We are pathetic cowards and slaves if we let these spivs and speculators tell us that we should live our lives on their terms and according to their sick and deranged values where all that matters is the sheer amount of wealth they can amass (and deprive others of the use thereof). As for Goldman Sachs, it is an investment bank that has now hoisted its true colours. It is not an honest broker, but a dishonest one, explicitly helping some clients over others. It can spin the issue however it likes, but the truth is now plain for all to see. This ought to mean the complete ruination of the reputation of Goldman Sachs. It is a true bombshell.

Goldman Sachs is the infamous “vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity”. This is a devastating indictment of its business practices and ethics (it doesn’t have any). Why isn’t this monstrosity put out of business? This institution is offensive to all decent people. It serves no function of any value to the people. It is a vehicle for making the rich richer, for transferring assets from the poor to the rich, for placing ever-increasing amounts of resources and power in the hands of those who already have more than could ever be deemed acceptable in a democracy.

Institutions such as Goldman Sachs are the very instruments that ensure that the people are never given any power in a democracy. They are the central reason for the failure of democracy. In a meritocracy, Goldman Sachs, and all of its clones, would be closed down. Many banks have been described as being “too big to fail” i.e. they have an implicit guarantee that, if they screw up on a huge scale, they will always be bailed out by taxpayers to prevent an economic catastrophe. You have to ask yourself why any institution should be allowed to place a gun at the head of taxpayers. Why were they allowed to become “too big”? Cui bono? Go figure.

The remedy is simple. Break up every major financial institution into parts, any of which will be allowed to fail if it screws up. The law should prevent any organization from becoming too big and powerful, from being able to have a huge and decisive influence over public affairs. Goldman Sachs has its tentacles in every aspect of the Western world’s economic functioning. Ex-Goldman Sachs executives are everywhere, running all sorts of organizations, institutions and government agencies. In effect, a Goldman Sachs network of influence extends all over the West. These people have the same political beliefs, the same mentality, the same aims, the same tactical and strategic thinking. They are a walking, talking, spreading conspiracy of wealth and power. They know who’s on their side and who isn’t. These are the people who send in economic “hit men” to devastate companies, and even countries that they want to bring under their power.

They are zealous advocates of Zionism, and they ensure that the West is dragged into supporting Israel, the most divisive nation on earth. What possible legitimate reasons are there for the West to alienate over a billion Muslims in order to suck up to a few million Zionists? It defies all logic, apart from the true logic of the world – that of power and wealth. Who controls it is all that counts – and the Zionists of Goldman Sachs are the Prime Movers when it comes to wealth, power and influence. Goldman Sachs would never employ you unless you were one of the “Elite”. They have an elaborate recruitment policy to ensure that only the “right type” ever steps through their doors. Goldman Sachs, by its very nature, is a conspiracy against the world, and it’s about time that the world now conspired against Goldman Sachs.

Goldman Sachs is an abomination. It serves no moral purpose. It does nothing to serve the people. It is the enemy of the people. The sinister “Illuminati” that exists in the popular mythology of the internet is really nothing other than Goldman Sachs. That institution of extravagant greed represents everything to which the true Illuminati is opposed. The great Adam Weishaupt would have been the first person to demand its total destruction.

Meritocracy is about taking explicit measures to ensure that no individual, family or group is allowed to acquire disproportionate wealth, power and influence. Capitalism, on the other hand, is a “winner-takes-all” ideology. The whole purpose of capitalism is to ensure that a tiny elite controls the means of production and takes almost all of the “surplus value” (i.e. profit) for themselves. The vast bulk of the surplus value of the global economy resides in the hands of a privileged elite who will do anything to hang on to it. They do not act in your interests; only in their own. We have no problem with people who work hard and have good ideas achieving considerable prosperity – but we do object to that wealth becoming excessive. Does anyone on earth need more than, say, one million dollars a year (after tax) to be considered extremely well rewarded for their efforts? So why is anyone on earth paid more than that? The vast bulk of the surplus value in the world should be reinvested in the people of the world, to raise up the whole of humanity, not to allow the Elite to each have twenty luxury mansions, three yachts, one hundred super cars, million-dollar parties, and whatever else they deem fit to lavish on themselves as they wallow in infinite narcissism.

Make no mistake, capitalism is the vehicle of excessive wealth, and it is capitalism that needs to be changed if we want a fair world. A cap on personal wealth of a million dollars a year after tax would be an appropriate start. Only people fuelled by greed could possibly complain about such a cap. And is not avarice one of the seven deadly sins? In Britain, former Prime Minister Gordon Brown spoke of “moral bankruptcy” and ordered an investigation of Goldman Sachs’ British operations by the Financial Services Authority.

Has the hour of its destruction finally come? Credit where credit’s due. No matter what we think of the SEC and the Obama administration, we will congratulate them if they make a start on the holy mission of ridding the world of the evil of Goldman Sachs. There can be no doubt that the strains of the Credit Crunch have caused rifts amongst the OWO. It appears that those who felt that Goldman Sachs did not treat all members of the OWO fairly are casting it adrift. Its catastrophic public image is making it an easy target for politicians. Never forget that Blankfein, the CEO of Goldman Sachs said that he was just a banker doing God’s work. What god is that? Yahweh, the Demiurge, Satan? In 2009, Blankfein earmarked $5bn for staff pay and bonuses. Let’s hope Blankfein and his Godly bank are going down – all the way to hell where they belong.
__________

The Illuminati versus Freemasonry:

The Illuminati were the founders of Freemasonry, but they did not run it in a hands-on way (they always leave satellite organisations to evolve in their own way since they have insufficient numbers and resources to manage them themselves, and in any case they think it right that the new organizations should control their own destiny). Although it began as a noble, heroic and anti-establishment organisation committed to spreading Enlightenment values, Freemasonry was soon identified by the Old World Order as the weak link in the resistance movement, one that could be “turned”. They were not wrong. The central problem with Freemasonry was that it expanded too fast. Originally it only recruited meritocratic individuals, highly committed to political and religious transformation of the world, but, as it expanded, new members joined who had none of the same reforming zeal but were merely curious about the secrets and ceremonial practices of Freemasonry.

This is one of the main reasons why the Illuminati remains a small organisation of only a few thousand adepts. Only by ensuring that new members are of the right type can the Order be protected from the kind of disaster that overtook Freemasonry. The Illuminati uses a “cell” consisting of three senior adepts to handle all matters of recruitment in a consistent way.

The 3-person Illuminati cell that is responsible for this series of books is a so-called “communication cell” (one of a number of such cells, all of which operate independently and are engaged in a variety of projects) and has no influence over the recruitment cell. We pass on details of individuals who contact us expressing an interest in joining the Illuminati (and we provide a recommendation), but virtually all such candidates are put on a “watch” file. In essence, this means that the progress of such candidates is monitored over a period of years to see if they are committed, zealous, meritocratic individuals who are not susceptible to the corruption of the OWO. “The Movement” is now the testing ground where would-be recruits can demonstrate their credentials.

We must emphasise again that the Illuminati are nothing like the Freemasons. We are not a group that seeks to have lodges in every town, nor to have a mass membership with money, power and influence rolling in. You can’t be admitted to the Illuminati because you know someone who knows someone, and so on. You can’t be admitted because you are rich and famous. You can’t be admitted simply because you are keen to learn secrets. You must be the right type of person, and the Illuminati usually takes years to decide whether or not you are.

The Illuminati rejects modern Freemasonry utterly because it has been hijacked by the so-called Star Families (bloodlines) of the Old World Order and has become their primary means of upholding their power. Every member of the OWO is a Mason, although they belong to extremely special lodges to which no ordinary Mason is ever admitted. What most people “know” about the Illuminati concerns the period when, under Grand Master Adam Weishaupt, the Order’s existence became a matter of public record. Weishaupt was a professor, an expert in law, canon law and philosophy, who was determined to push forward the agenda of the Enlightenment with its two primary goals:

a) To attack the idiocy, hypocrisy, illogic, corruption and oppression of Christianity and b) To attack the inequality, unfairness, tyranny, elitism, injustice and oppression of the European monarchies and the arrogant aristocracies that supported them.

Weishaupt was a highly educated academic (in common with many members of the Illuminati), committed to bringing about a New World Order based on meritocracy where everyone has a fair chance and can rise as high as their talents warrant. It is astounding that Weishaupt’s New World Order has been transformed in contemporary mythology from a vehicle to overthrow tyranny into one that, according to the deranged anarcho-capitalist libertarians with their shape-shifting Reptiles, Hollow Earth, Nibiru and microchip theories, will bring about the greatest tyranny of all, where the Earth is ruled by fascist aliens.

How can any rational human being equate what Weishaupt actually said with what the libertarian lunatics are claiming he said? Weishaupt’s New World Order is the best thing that could happen to this earth. It is the means by which the world will move from the squalid rule of the Old World Order to the visionary society envisaged by Star Trek. Which society would you rather have? Only enemies of meritocracy, justice, fraternity, liberty and equality are opposed to Weishaupt’s New World Order.

Reject all of those who condemn the New World Order. The NWO is precisely what we should all be aiming for: the world where all of us have the best chance to make the most of ourselves, to use our talents to the full, to achieve maximum self-fulfilment.

The Illuminati’s main problem is its own creation: Freemasonry. Freemasonry was designed as a movement to advance the cause of the Enlightenment. Initially, Freemasonry did exactly what was expected of it. In particular, it helped during the French Revolution to overthrow the evil monarchy of Louis XVI. Before that, it gave rise to the Republic of the United States of America where the great Illuminist Thomas Jefferson was the main author of the inspirational Declaration of Independence. The sentiments expressed there are what the Illuminati stand for, yet the anarcho-capitalist libertarians who, perversely, claim to be on the side of truth, freedom and justice, oppose these principles.

Thomas Jefferson ensured that America allowed its citizens to worship God in whatever way they chose i.e. there was no state church, no state religion, no demands for people to follow particular religious practices. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

A strict “wall of separation” was maintained between religion and state, exactly as any healthy state would desire. It is all the more remarkable that America has become such a Christian Fundamentalist nation that blindly supports Israel, a nation that has an explicitly religious identity i.e. there is no wall of separation in Israel. In fact, the opposite is true: it is a Jewish state. The head of state of the UK doubles up as the head of the state church of England: the Anglican Church. How can a monarch be the leader of a religion? It’s absurd. Many nations are explicitly Muslim. Pity those who live in those countries who do not subscribe to Islam. State religion is one of the greatest of all evils. Religious nations should be boycotted and ostracised from the community of nations.

A modern state without monarchy and without a state religion – this was the first part of Weishaupt’s New World Order. He wanted the American model to be extended to every European nation groaning under monarchy and state religion. Unfortunately, America soon became as corrupt as the European nations, but the failure of America is to do with the people who have been allowed to rise to power, not with the principles upon which the Republic was founded. Those principles were never fully implemented. If they had been, America would have become the great beacon of hope for humanity that it was always intended to be. America can still be that beacon. Only those who are opposed to the foundation of the American Republic could possibly oppose Weishaupt’s New World Order, and indeed many anarcho-capitalist libertarians do indeed bemoan the creation of America and label it as a sinister Masonic conspiracy from the outset. America has not evolved as its founders intended it should, but that was because the “Empire” fought back i.e. the Old World Order worked out how to sabotage the wondrous American experiment.

They chose Freemasonry as the Trojan Horse that would allow them to infiltrate the new American system of government. This was the logical and perfect choice since most of the leading figures in the American Revolution were Masons. The Illuminati had intended Masons to be Enlightenment warriors – noble, honourable, principled and driven by meritocracy – but the Old World Order appealed to the oldest of temptations: greed and lust for money, power, fame, sex and influence. They turned Freemasonry to the dark side by the simple and brutally effective use of bribery and corruption. It’s the tactic they always use to neutralise their enemies, and it rarely fails.

Freemasonry is now a nauseating, unprincipled, self-serving secret society of free-loaders, carpetbaggers, robber barons, gangsters, racketeers and everyone who’s fake, on the make and on the take. The only difference between the Mafia and Freemasonry is that the Mafia are outside the establishment while the Freemasons are the establishment.

Notorious mobster Al Capone said:

“Capitalism is the legitimate racket of the ruling class.”

“You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone.”

“I have built my organization upon fear.”

These are identical to the sentiments of the OWO. The truth is that the OWO are a gangster conspiracy that is treated as legitimate. Washington DC and Wall Street are full of gangsters stealing from the public, committing hold ups in broad daylight, silencing their enemies and doing everything to further “our thing”. Like the Mafia, they are “family” men and women, fully committed to making sure their children get much more than everyone else’s children. Like the Mafia, they use force to achieve their ends. They are criminals wearing a cloak of fake respectability. Economist John Maynard Keynes said, “Capitalism is the astounding belief that the wickedest of men will do the wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.” Isn’t it time we wised up?

The OWO are arch capitalists (i.e. racketeers) and they have no interest at all in doing anything for the greatest good of everyone. They are in it entirely for themselves. Look at the Wall Street gang: the size of their bonus is their only concern. The whole world can go to hell as long as they get their super-inflated bonus. If their bonus is refused they will threaten to leave the country and go where they are more appreciated. This is essentially the thesis of Ayn Rand’s nauseating novel Atlas Shrugged. The rest of us should make it as easy as possible for these people to go elsewhere. Every nation would be better off without these sociopaths.

The great unholy alliance of our time is between Washington DC’s Freemasonry and Wall Street’s Jewish bankers. The banks provide the financial muscle while the Masons provide the political and social power: a marriage truly made in hell.

Chelsea Clinton, the daughter of former President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is married to Jewish Goldman Sachs investment banker Marc Mezvinsky, son of former Pennsylvania Representative Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky and former Iowa Representative Ed Mezvinsky. This is how the old World Order works: dynastic marriages stretching across the banking and political worlds, continually extending their financial and political power. It’s happening right in front of our faces. How long before Marc Mezvinsky is on the board of Goldman Sachs; how long before Chelsea Clinton is running for President? Already, the wheels are in motion for these things to happen. Already, the OWO are preparing the path for these two chosen ones. Already OWO teams have started work on these projects. Already, others are shut out, blocked, regardless of their merits.

For centuries, Europe was controlled by a group of royal families that engaged relentlessly in dynastic marriages to consolidate their wealth and power. Royalty is no longer what it was, but the OWO have simply replaced it with new dynastic marriages between bankers and politicians, those who control our money and those who control the laws that govern us. They rule us with the same arrogance and selfishness as the monarchs of old.

When he was young, Bill Clinton was a member of the junior Masonic association the “Order of De Molay”. He later entered the ultra-elitist and utterly secretive OWO Masonic lodge called “The Golden Star of Minerva”. (It must be acknowledged that many of the names and symbols associated with Freemasonry ultimately derive from the Illuminati, the founders of Freemasonry. Now the Illuminati can only look on appalled as their ancient names and symbols are abused in the most disgraceful manner by modern Masons as these charlatans desperately seek authenticity.)

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had a close friendship with former UK Foreign Secretary David Miliband who, like Chelsea’s fiancé is Jewish (Miliband’s brother Ed is also a senior British politician, and is now the leader of the Labour Party). We can be sure no substantive pressure will be exerted on Israel by America and the UK to make the Israelis stop their disgraceful treatment of the Palestinians.

When are people going to wake up? We cannot allow these dynasties to keep gathering more and more power.

Never forget the unholiest alliance: Masonic power and Jewish money, the axis of evil around which the Old World Order revolves. The people of Israel claim that God led them to the “Promised Land” and that they have a divine right to be there. Of course, the Palestinians, once known as the Canaanites, were in the Land of Canaan long before the Hebrews showed up with their “army of God”. They, not the Israelis, are the people who can legitimately claim that Canaan is their historical homeland. Only a Satanic god would ever promise a people a land that already belonged to another people. And look how effective Satan’s promise proved: thousands of years later, conflict and hatred is still rife in the so-called “holy” land.

The Old Testament story of how the Hebrews violently seized control of Canaan with the help of their partisan, violent God is one of the most shocking and horrific narratives ever placed before the world, that such a tale should be place in a supposedly holy book and fed to billions of people over several millennia is one of the greatest sins ever perpetrated against humanity. Marcion was right that this sickening book should be treated with nothing but horror and revulsion. It would have been much better for the world if this tale had never been told.

But it must be emphasised that there are many good Jews who are as opposed to what the Jewish banking fraternity get up to as we are. There can be no knee-jerk anti-Semitism. The Old World Order consists of only 6,000 people: a small number of super-rich Jews, a small number of super-influential Freemasons, a small number of members of the aristocratic and royal families of Europe, a small number of super-celebrities and a small number of self-serving “intellectuals” and propagandists. They are backed up by senior members of the world’s security forces (military and police) and intelligence services.

Insofar as the Illuminati founded Freemasonry and Freemasonry has now become the opposite of what it was intended to be, it is perhaps not unsurprising that the Illuminati has been condemned in some circles, but this is unjust. Freemasonry was corrupted by the OWO; it is no longer the noble brotherhood originally designed by the Illuminati. That is why the Illuminati now advocate a completely different vehicle for advancing the cause of a New World Order, one to which any motivated person can contribute. “The Movement” is the way forward to change the world. You can be part of it too.
__________

3/9