QR Code Business Card

Join Us on FACEBOOKVă invit să vă alăturaţi grupului Facebook Mişcarea DACIA, ce-şi propune un alt fel de a face politică!

Citiţi partea introductivă şi proiectul de Program, iar dacă vă place, veniţi cu noi !
O puteţi face clicând alături imaginea, sau acest link

1789 -1989

Giugno 6th, 2019 No Comments   Posted in Mişcarea Dacia

Ralph Bakker

‘1789 -1989

In 1789, the French Revolution decisively ushered in the Modern Age. The American Declaration of Independence of 1776 and the establishment of the American Republic had signalled the beginning of the end for the era of powerful monarchs, but America was a distant colony of the British Empire and not yet a giant on the world stage. Its liberation did not provide a fundamental psychological rebooting of the human mind. Europe was where the world was controlled and only in Europe could the transformation to modernity begin. The decisive blow was struck in France, which thus takes the honour of being the first modern nation. When one of the most powerful monarchies on earth fell to a people’s Revolution, and the King and most of his ruling order were executed, the irreversible signal had been broadcast to the world that it was no longer business as usual for the ruling elite. Now the people would have their say.

The age of monarchs did not however properly end until the bloodbath of the First World War. In 1917, the Russian Revolution toppled the Tsar who was executed by Bolsheviks in the following year. 1918, the year in which the cataclysm ended, also saw the end of the powerful German monarch Kaiser Wilhelm II. In the meantime, the British monarchy, terrified of its people, was compelled to change its name from the Germanic “Saxe-Coburg-Gotha” to the English “Windsor” – a fake name for a disgusting, fake family.

The one hundred and twenty-nine years from 1789 to 1918 is how long it can take for a dialectical age of the World to be fully resolved. The Illuminati-inspired American and French revolutions began the modern world but only a World War completed the job.

The 1917 Russian Revolution was the beginning of the next phase of the dialectic: class war between the rich capitalist elite (who took over from monarchs and the nobility as the power elite) and the ordinary people. A war between capitalism and communism was inevitable, but, before it could break out, a new dialectical force appeared on the scene, a synthesis of capitalism and communism called Fascism (or “national socialism”). Fascism was based on the concept of a capitalist elite being subordinated to a totally dominant national leader (a Duce or Fuehrer). The Leader allowed the capitalists to make healthy profits, but only if they did his bidding. Capitalism, in Fascist countries, was harnessed to state policy rather than to free markets. Fascism and communism were both based on the same economic model of an enormously centralised command and control system under the charge of a totalitarian, paramilitary political party. The central difference was that communism outlawed private ownership of industry whereas Fascism was happy to use the capitalist class as its economic agents. National Socialism in Germany was spectacularly successful, transforming in a few short years a nation in economic ruin and chaos, suffering from disastrous hyperinflation and enormous unemployment. Of course, most of the reason for the success lay in the fact that the whole nation was given over to rebuilding the German military machine to its former glory.

In the modern day, China has much more in common with Hitler’s National Socialism than it does with Marxism. Like Hitler, the Chinese totalitarian Communist Party now actively utilise the capitalist model of private ownership under central direction. Technically, China is no longer a communist nation but national socialist i.e. Fascist. National Socialism has proved to be an extremely effective way of running economies – far superior to free market capitalism – because it is capable of avoiding the disastrous, irresponsible, greed-fuelled boom and bust cycles of irrational free markets.

Markets are like tiny, hysterical children, driven by greed and terror. There is no rationale at work, no controlling mind. National Socialism, on the other hand, provides a coherent framework, aligning the interests of the state with the capitalist economy. Contemporary America is not governed by politicians but by banks, corporations and lobbyists. Non-elected entities, unaccountable to the people, direct the destiny of America. Politicians are irrelevant and have no real power at all. Elections are meaningless and are performed merely for show. It doesn’t matter who’s in charge, Democrats or Republicans. Wall Street, and the Jews and Freemasons of Goldman Sachs in particular, run America. America isn’t a nation; it’s a corporation run by business and banking interests, and a large army of lawyers.
The Illuminati’s economic system – which can be variously called social, public or meritocratic capitalism – has, technically, a certain similarity to centrally controlled National Socialism, with the critical difference that there is no totalitarian party in charge and no Fuehrer. In social capitalism, there are no privileged elites, no dynastic families, no inherited wealth, no free market mayhem, and no boom and bust.

In social capitalism, the most meritocratic individuals set economic policy according to the needs of “positive liberty”, the doctrine of actively seeking to improve the quality of humanity. All economic activities that seek to degrade, exploit and sedate “the masses” are outlawed. Free markets are fine, to the extent that they support meritocratic objectives. They are never fine if their purpose is to make disproportionate wealth for greedy capitalists who have no interest in the Commonwealth.

Despite all the obfuscation of economists, economics is a simple subject. It is in fact entirely a function of politics. In the nineteenth century, capitalism was production-oriented. That suited the political need to build an advanced industrial nation with a complex infrastructure. Capitalist goods were sturdy and long lasting. A person might own a single pair of shoes for years. Production capitalism was about functionality and utility: everything had to be useful, practical and enduring. But what happens when the infrastructure is built and everyone has their indestructible shoes?

After WWI, American capitalism had to reinvent itself. It switched from production to consumption and the birth of the consumer who has been the focus of capitalism ever since. People no longer bought things because they needed them but because they wanted them. This was a revolutionary change. Now the purpose of capitalism was no longer to manufacture useful things but to stimulate demand for, essentially, useless things. This suited the political agenda because consumers, with an immense number of choices regarding what goods and services to buy, saw themselves not as cogs in a machine but as free people. Democracy, freedom and capitalism became effectively synonymous, and were always presented as a package. So, if you were hostile to capitalism, for example, you would be branded an enemy of freedom.

The major competitor of capitalism was communism. This was also production-oriented but because it banned private ownership, profit-making and extra reward for harder work, production proved inefficient, cumbersome, non-innovative and the goods produced were slipshod and ugly. In other words, the politics of communism and its hatred of salary differentials, hence of any incentive for anyone to try hard and come up with new ideas, inevitably gave rise to an unmotivated workforce manufacturing low-quality goods. There was no market to test goods, and no competition between rival companies since the State prohibited commercial competition.

The Soviet Union produced endless junk. Capitalist America produced endless exquisitely produced junk. Americans liked their glossy junk that they were free to choose much more than the Soviets liked their shoddy junk that didn’t work most of the time and which offered them no choice.

Communist China was once like the Soviet Union, and in fact even more backward, but when it became “national socialist” China, everything changed. The Chinese started manufacturing reasonable-quality consumerist junk that massively undercut American prices. So the whole Western economy started buying enormous amounts of Chinese goods. Credit was handed out like candy to allow people to buy as much as possible. Major Western corporations started transferring their production facilities to China, hence work started to dry up in America. The salaries of the low-paid were driven down. Ordinary American people couldn’t afford repayments on their mortgages. Consumption stuttered and went into reverse. The global economy stalled. All the hidden debts in the system were suddenly brutally exposed and enormous numbers of people started defaulting on their loans. Banks, having loaned incredible amounts of money to all and sundry in order to maximise their profits, and retained practically no capital reserves (because the more they loaned, the higher their profits were, so why not loan every last cent, thus massively inflating the profits of the banks and permitting gargantuan bonuses to the senior personnel?) were now all technically insolvent since they didn’t have the capital to meet their immediate financial obligations. That had never been a problem in the past because they could borrow what they needed from other banks, but now the other banks were in the same boat – the whole system had imploded. The game of musical chairs had ended and there were no chairs left at all.

According to the laws of free market capitalism, the entire banking system should have gone out of business, but of course that would have meant the death of capitalism itself and total political chaos. So all the rich people were allowed to keep their wealth and the gullible taxpayers had to bail out the bankrupt banks. Now it was the State rather than the private banks that was groaning under an unmanageable debt. Governments all across the West had to slash public spending. Millions of workers were laid off and salaries frozen for everyone else. But the rich bankers kept getting their vast bonuses – now paid for by the taxpayers. The rich had found their holy grail – the privatisation of profits (i.e. they get to keep all of the profits in the good times) and the socialisation of losses (i.e. the taxpayers pick up the pieces when the high-risk games go wrong).

That’s the world we live in now. Capitalism is dead, replaced by capitalist socialism – the most monstrous economic miscarriage ever know. The rich, as the controllers of the global economy, simply get governments to transfer the losses of private corporations to the State sector. America could easily have declared itself officially socialist and proclaimed that the State was now running the entire economy, including the banks since the taxpayers had effectively paid for the whole shooting match.

Ask yourself this – why are you paying for something even though you don’t get to own it nor to enjoy any of the profits (vast bonuses), which go to the people who screwed the whole thing up in the first place? Is that the act of a rational people? Moreover, how can employees of insolvent banks be getting bonuses at all (these are not of course paid out of genuine profits since there aren’t any – instead they’re paid directly by the taxpayers)? The reason they are paid bonuses is that that they will all leave if they don’t, and the banks will collapse. In other words, they’re blackmailing the taxpayers and extorting money from them with menaces. Why don’t the people lock them up in jail as if they were Mafia hoodlums (which is effectively what they are)?

Contemporary economics is a madhouse. Politicians aren’t in charge of it. The super rich are. They have arranged to keep getting enormous bonuses, paid for by the taxpayers. The whole point of Western economic policy is simply to prevent the rich from ever losing their wealth, and to keep saddling the taxpayers with ever-increasing debt. The official economic objective of the West (though never expressed in those terms) is: KEEP THE RICH RICH.

The West is terrified of what would happen if the wealth of the rich were allowed to be challenged. Banks would collapse, the stock market would endure the biggest fall in history and the entire political and economic system of the West would die. To avoid this, we keep the rich rich. They have a gun pointed to our heads and we are doing nothing to disarm them.

We are now playing out an economic catastrophe. There are hedge funds in America that are betting so heavily against the Euro that they are making its collapse almost inevitable. But if the Euro goes down, so does the global economy. So American capitalists are actually using the levers of capitalism to destroy capitalism in order to make massive profits from the collapse. What these retards have failed to understand is that without capitalism, all of their ill-gotten gains will be useless.

When ultra-capitalists are betting on capitalism to fail, you know that the system has become utterly insane. This is what it means to have “free markets” in charge of the global economy rather than intelligent politicians and economists with a clear agenda.

Neither Communist China nor Nazi Germany would ever have permitted free marketeers to destabilise the economy. Under Hitler, all of the hedge fund managers would have been put in concentration camps. In China, they might well have been executed.

Is it not an astonishing thing that although Western taxpayers have had to effectively buy the Western banking system, not a single politician anywhere suggested that they should henceforth be running the banks for the public and not the private good and that all future profits would be returned to the citizens? Why weren’t all the rich bankers, who had spectacularly failed to run their banks responsibly, fired and replaced by publicly accountable officials? Why weren’t all of the enormous bonuses stopped? Who arranged the bail out? – expensive gangs of ex Goldman Sachs executives. Well, surprise, surprise. That’s like putting vampires in charge of the blood bank.

The American economy has been hijacked by the rich elite and its only purpose is to protect the wealth of the rich come what may. The Soviet Union was bankrupted by the Afghanistan War, but the debts of the communists were as NOTHING compared with the debts of today’s capitalist West. If the Soviet Union was a failure, the capitalist West is an enormously bigger one. Why has no one in the media commented on this salient fact?

The degree of anti-socialist indoctrination to which Westerners have been subjected is so extreme that no one even suggested that the banks should be “socialised” from now on and their specific remit should be to grow the economy in a stable way without boom or bust cycles fuelled by insane greed and hysterical fear. What sane person would say that banks shouldn’t have that function? As it is, the purpose of banks is to generate enormous bonuses for a select few Jews and Freemasons. That’s their raison d’être.

Free markets must, ultimately, be under political control. If they’re not then they invariably submit to oligopolies and cartels and become irredeemably corrupt. All information relating to all markets should be freely available to all participants in the market at exactly the same time. There should be no hidden gambles going on such as those of hedge funds. Everything should be transparent, including all of the identities of all participants.

Capitalism, hitherto, has been about materialism, about producing objects, mostly of a junk nature. What’s the point? Capitalism doesn’t need to be about objects. Imagine a world with only ten percent of the objects that we have right now. Imagine that to fill the gap, ninety percent of the human working population weren’t involved in producing and selling objects but in creating and delivering educational services covering all conceivable subjects. Imagine that you could make a living from teaching the subject you love best and that everyone around you was doing exactly the same. We all sell our knowledge to others and they sell their knowledge to us, and we all become smarter. There’s barely an object in sight. We go shopping for new knowledge, not for new disposable objects. Imagine an enormous marketplace in knowledge where we pick and choose what to learn – rather than an enormous marketplace in objects where we pick and choose what junk to take home with us and that we use to define who we are (“Hey, look at me, I own this set of objects so I must be cool and desirable.”).

All that really matters is that you should have a viable job. It doesn’t matter what you’re selling as long as there’s a marketplace for it. Objects need not be the main point of capitalism at all; it could be anything: art, culture, knowledge, music, spirituality, whatever you like. All that matters is that money should flow round the system, allowing everyone to live comfortably. Imagine that you taught classes several times a week, and you also attended classes of other people. Instead of accumulating objects, you accumulate knowledge. Some subjects might have much higher demand than others and therefore the teacher can ask for more money. Some teachers might offer cheaper classes in order to boost numbers. Some might want a select audience and charge high prices, and thus we see all the normal marketplace mechanisms coming into play, but without an object in sight.

If we lived in a knowledge economy rather than an object economy, wouldn’t we become enormously smarter? Wouldn’t the quality of the human race rise prodigiously? Wouldn’t crime fall, and social deprivation? We would have a much more informed, cultured human race, with far fewer needless objects collecting dust. The planet would be much cleaner if we could avoid all of the pollution associated with industry and replace it with the ultimate “clean”, eco-product: ideas.

We live in a staggeringly stupid and unimaginative economic system where we define ourselves by what objects we own. We have thereby turned ourselves into objects. We’re barely human at all.

The capitalism versus communism dialectic was taken on a detour by WWII when the capitalists and communists were compelled to unite to defeat the extremely dangerous hybrid form (National Socialism). Then it was business as usual – the “Cold War”.

In 1989, the fall of the Berlin Wall symbolised the end of communism. Yet, amazingly, it also signalled the beginning of the end for capitalism, although no one realised. Borrowing from Hegel and Marx, Francis Fukuyama produced a brilliant but absurd book proclaiming that History had come to an end because “liberal democracy” had now manifestly defeated all challengers. Liberal democracy would be rolled out all across the globe and that it would be for the rest of time.

This demonstrated better than anything else the demented triumphalism of the capitalists. The leading capitalists now thought they were gods and routinely referred to themselves as “masters of the universe”. Given that there was no longer any viable alternative to capitalism, the leading capitalists could afford to dispense with all concerns over social fairness and demand ultra capitalism based on zero government interference in the workings of markets. All controls were removed. Regulation practically vanished. Everything the capitalists wanted, they got. All sorts of laws restricting and controlling markets were repealed. Retail banks could start having investment bank functions. The amount of capital reserves they legally needed was shrunk to almost nothing, allowing every dollar invested in the bank to be maximally leveraged (meaning that the risks were magnified to a ridiculous degree). The whole economy of the West began to revolve around a single factor: house prices. While house prices went up, all bets were successful and everything seemed to create healthy profits. People actually convinced themselves that house prices could never fall. Mortgages were given to ninjas – no income, no job or assets. At this point, the system had become insane. The idea was that ninjas could keep borrowing against the rising value of their home to keep paying the mortgage, the ultimate Indian rope trick.

But, of course, if anything went wrong, if house prices failed to go up, the whole system was CERTAIN to collapse. Not just to collapse, but to take the whole global economy with it. Any sane form of government, any economic system based on reason rather than voodoo, would have seen it coming a mile off. After all, isn’t one of the primary tests of a rational system the ability to analyse, predict and take evasive manoeuvres? A few experts – very, very few – did give warnings, but were promptly ignored and called doomsayers. No one in casino capitalism likes a party pooper. Voodoo beats reason every time.

And so the financial crisis descended on the world and things aren’t getting any better. In fact, the warning signs are all there again that we are on the verge of not just recession but the greatest Depression in human history. If it comes, and the odds are now maybe 50/50 or worse – does any leader on earth have any grasp of what’s going on, or any ability to control events? The markets have consistently crushed the politicians.

What is the “market”? It’s essentially a small, elite group of cartels intent on making money in whatever circumstances. When they act in any particular direction, the rest of the market – the hangers on, the sheep, the dumb cattle – does the same. Any effect is instantly massively magnified. Most players in the market aren’t reacting to any rational analysis of anything at all; they are simply reacting to whether indices are going up or doing. If they’re going up, the investors feel great and invest more. If they’re going down, they start to panic and sell.

The market is therefore a small group of huge players harnessed to an enormous number of small players who get infected with greed or fear in an instant. The stock market can crash by hundreds of points because someone spread a plausible rumour of impending disaster. Such rumours aren’t accidents, they’re agreed strategies by big players to “short” the market. The more they can drive down the market the more money they can make. Once they’ve driven it down, they can then of course buy at the new cheap prices and make a huge profit as the prices surge upwards again. So, they profit whether the market is going down or up and more often than not, they’re the ones making it go down or up. Small players can’t have any significant effect at all on the market by themselves. Only the big players can set the trends. The whole system is geared up for manipulation and corruption, and none of it is ever meaningfully investigated.

So this “market”, outwith the control of any government on earth and susceptible to extreme manipulation by organised cartels of big players, can change the economic climate in a second and induce ferocious greed or equally ferocious fear. Moreover, there are enormous computerised trading systems in operation and these aren’t under any human control at all. They are totally reliant on the skill of those who programmed them and anyone who knows anything about programming knows that all programs contain bugs and some of these bugs only appear in unusual situations – exactly the unforeseen and untested situations that occur during rapid boom or bust. And this is supposed to be a sane system! Who’s flying this plane?!!!!

We’re over the ocean, and we’ve just realised there’s no pilot in the cockpit and there’s a catastrophic fuel leak. That’s capitalism for you. It’s utter insanity to leave anything to any “invisible hand” of any market unless you can rationally define the hand, all of the parameters associated with it and its entire scope of operation. If you can’t, you have no choice but to tightly regulate it.

So, the death of communism had the unexpected effect of delivering a fatal blow to capitalism too, though that was the last thing that people grasped in 1989. They thought the opposite had taken place; the absolute vindication and perpetual triumph of capitalism. Yet that’s exactly when hubris takes over, and, as the ancient Greeks understood so well, nemesis is sure to follow. Capitalism removed all the factors that had kept it relatively sane. The reason for this was that the rich elite demanded the removal of all obstacles blocking their path to ever-increasing profits. Governments gave them whatever they wanted and there was an enormous boom, with most of the money going to a tiny elite.

Political analyst Drew Westen wrote in the New York Times: “A final explanation is that he [Obama] ran for president on two contradictory platforms: as a reformer who would clean up the system, and as a unity candidate who would transcend the lines of red and blue. He has pursued the one with which he is most comfortable given the constraints of his character, consistently choosing the message of bipartisanship over the message of confrontation. But the arc of history does not bend toward justice through capitulation cast as compromise. It does not bend when 400 people control more of the wealth than 150 million of their fellow Americans. It does not bend when the average middle-class family has seen its income stagnate over the last 30 years while the richest 1 percent has seen its income rise astronomically. It does not bend when we cut the fixed incomes of our parents and grandparents so hedge fund managers can keep their 15 percent tax rates. It does not bend when only one side in negotiations between workers and their bosses is allowed representation. And it does not bend when, as political scientists have shown, it is not public opinion but the opinions of the wealthy that predict the votes of the Senate. The arc of history can bend only so far before it breaks.”

400 people in the USA have as much money as the bottom half of the American population – 150 million people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

150,000,000 versus 400.
150,000,000 versus 400.
150,000,000 versus 400.
150,000,000 versus 400.
150,000,000 versus 400.

Is this sane? Is it rational? Is it comprehensible? Where is the REVOLUTION?!!! What kind of person tolerates this situation? How can anyone think this is the right and proper way for a country to develop? 400 private individuals, unaccountable to the people, have the same power as 150,000,000 Americans. Is that what the Founding Fathers intended? Wasn’t the separation of powers supposed to stop any group acquiring too much power? Why wasn’t it applied to private individuals? Why were the rich allowed to stand outside the separation of powers? Precisely because of that, they were allowed to use their enormous wealth to buy the political system lock, stock and barrel. They controlled the politicians, but no one controlled them. That’s the law of wealth. Wealth makes you a king above the law, a dictator with absolute power.

The rich became mad with vanity, greed and power. And they have brought destruction upon the rest of us, while suffering no consequences at all. The people are so powerfully brainwashed by the elite’s media machine that no one has taken any action against the rich.

That same situation of infinite power in the hands of the elite applied in pre-revolutionary France. The monarchy and aristocracy though they were immune. Then came 1789 and the world changed forever.

1789 is coming again. The countdown has begun. The arrogant elite are no longer held in high esteem. They are no longer respected or even deemed competent. They are now seen as crooks, robber barons, carpetbaggers, looters, spivs and conmen in it purely for themselves. The total erosion in the reputation of these people will reap a terrible consequence in due course. They are now living on borrowed time, blissfully unaware of the storm coming, as oblivious as the elite of France at the start of 1789.

If they were at all rational, the rich would surrender ninety percent of their wealth to pay off the huge debts that their criminal irresponsibility and recklessness had on the global economy, and they would still be able to live in luxury. But we know they never will. The dialectic always plays out to the end. These infinitely greedy people are incapable of doing the right, honourable and rational thing. And thus they will reap their inevitable “reward”.

1989, exactly two centuries after the French Revolution, saw the birth of another critical dialectical strand that’s having an enormous impact on our world. It was the year Englishman Tim Berners-Lee invented the World Wide Web. The internet has been a revolution in itself but it also has another unprecedented effect: it’s a Revolution ACCELERATOR.

In past ages, books, newspapers, radios, music records, film and TV all served as social accelerators, but these were almost always controlled by gatekeepers working for one elite or another. What makes the internet radically different is that the gatekeepers can be bypassed. The “word on the street” can become the word all around the globe, without the elite having the vaguest idea what’s going on. The internet allows the elite to be taken out of the loop.

The sociological phenomenon of “other-directedness” goes hand-in-hand with the internet and massively magnifies specific effects. Other-directedness involves such things as peer group pressure, fashion, groupthink and hysterical contagion. Other-directed people are not truly in control of their own behaviour. They are so influenced by others that they quickly adopt whatever posture and opinions are held by the dominant and “coolest” group. Fashions, opinions and memes can spread astoundingly quickly. Viral contagion can infect the internet overnight. A person can go to bed unknown and wake up next morning known all around the globe if something he has done has gone viral.

There has never been a phenomenon like the internet. The world hasn’t even begun to wake up to its true power yet and the changes it is bringing to the world. It has brought to life Marshal McLuhan’s concept of the Global Village. Everything is now local. All boundaries are breached and annihilated. Everything is converging. The existence of different cultures is coming under threat – the world is heading relentlessly towards a single, global culture. The Muslims of the Arab Spring were heavily influenced by American and European ideas. Eventually, Islam itself may start to collapse as Muslims identify more with the global culture than with daily prayers and reading the Koran.

One thing that now seems sure to happen is the death of “tradition-directedness”: life guided by ancient books and ancient bearded leaders. The great weapon used by tradition-oriented societies was separation. Community elders could literally stop the young people from being contaminated by outside influences by using physical barriers. But now anyone with an internet connection has access to the whole world. WALLS DON’T MATTER ANYMORE. It’s no use parents denying their children internet access. All it takes is for one person to have access and all the rest will get access via that person. And if parents don’t allow access, they cut their children off from the world and make them backward.

What caused the Muslim uprisings? – the internet. Many of the Muslims spoke of “freedom”, their idea of freedom clearly being based on Western notions. To that extent, these Muslims are becoming more liberal. But on the other hand, Islamic jihadist extremism has also been massively accentuated by the internet. So we see another effect of the internet – the disappearance of the middle ground. People become more liberal or more extreme. The mid-ground is a position of compromise but on the internet all extremists can find many voices every bit as extreme as theirs, so they no longer feel any need to compromise.

The Tea Party is an internet phenomenon. So is conspiracy theory world. Conspiracy theorists create more and more bizarre theories, being fed all the time by the crazy input from millions of fantasists. The 9/11 conspiracy theory nonsense could never have happened as it did in the absence of the internet. Immense numbers of half-baked opinions, factoids, misquotations, distortions and curious facts and oddities can be spun together to create immense webs of conspiracy. Viral transmission provides a rocket boost and the natural tendency of most people to ignore reason and analysis (Logos) in favour of exciting stories and fantasies (Mythos) means that billions fall under the spell of absolute nonsense. How is it that billions of people believe in the Torture God of Abraham if not by a complete suspension of rationality? Humans are extremely prone to believing what they want to believe and ignoring everything else. A conspiracy theorist is someone who accepts as true everything that supports the conspiracy theory and rejects as false everything that contradicts it. Indeed the contradictions are deemed to be misinformation and disinformation put out by the conspirators to put people off the trail.

A few factoids and anomalies can be combined with fantasy, wishful thinking and a political axe to grind to create something that takes on a life of its own. BULLSHIT can be magnified to a ridiculous degree, and, as Hitler observed, the bigger the lie the more likely it is to be believed. People believe what they want to believe and if lots of others believe it too then it becomes reinforced, socially acceptable and hence TRUE! The internet can therefore make eccentric but popular ideas mainstream and credible.

The internet is a magnifier, accelerator, exaggerator and reinforcer. It makes the world more extreme. A more extreme world is where unthinkable things become thinkable. All bets are off. Black swan events become commonplace rather than the exception.

We can think of the world being converted not into a single global village but several such villages, each belonging to an extremist tribe, each hating the others. Intolerance will grow in all directions. Even liberals will become more intolerant.

The death of communism had the unintended consequence of delivering a fatal blow to capitalism. Flushed with triumphalism, the leading capitalists bullied and manipulated the governments into removing all brakes from the capitalist greed machine. Capitalism went out of control and in 2008 the Western banking system was technically insolvent i.e. capitalism had died on the operating table, but no one was willing to “call it” and pronounce the time of death. Instead, the capitalists did the most outrageous and hypocritical thing imaginable: they invoked socialism to save them. In effect, private businesses transferred all of their debts to the State, but without transferring any control. It was the WORST POSSIBLE OUTCOME for the people. They got all the debts dumped on them, with no formal ownership or control over anything. Why did the people get the debts but not the profits? “No taxation without representation!” the American Revolutionaries declared in the War of Independence. Yet now the American people have been swamped by enormous debt and taxation and they don’t have a single representative on the boards of any of the private institutions that needed to be bailed out. Is that not INSANE? The Americans have been betrayed by their leaders. They now have the constitutional right to remove the government from office, just as they had the right to remove the rule of the British Empire. It’s time for the American people to act.

The world has allowed the mad ideology of “free markets” to dominate economics. What is the aim of ALL of the participants in these free markets? TO MAKE MONEY! Generating profit is their sole preoccupation. A market does not care about reason, education, knowledge, quality, goodness, morality, virtue, moderation, caution, stability or any of the other qualities that we would expect to be exhibited by a benevolent government. It’s asking for disaster to harness government to an inherently unstable and irrational greed machine.

There’s a place for free markets but only with a carefully defined framework. The markets have to be subservient to government, not government to markets. We now know for a fact where free market economics leads us – CATASTROPHE. Free market economics is now as dead as communism.

Just as every individual is free to do whatever they like within the LAW in order to ensure social stability, markets should be allowed to operate freely within the legal framework that is imposed on them to ensure economic stability. The stability of the market is the main point, not its freedom, because unfettered freedom will sooner or later generate a catastrophe.

It always comes back to the same issue – who’s in charge? Should elected governments run a country, or private, unaccountable individuals in charge of banks and corporations? Should markets devoted solely to profit-making (usually resulting in astonishing and deranged risk-taking and corporate immorality) be the economic engine of a nation rather than rational policies dedicated to stable growth and the improvement of the nation and its people? Isn’t it time the people were in charge rather than the rich?

All instabilities will now be massively and instantly magnified by the internet and global computer systems. Stock markets in every part of the world have effectively merged to create a single global stock market. All markets tend to go up or down at the same time because they are all reacting to each other. Any local rumour can become a global rumour in an instant. There are no firewalls separating systems any longer. In ships, to prevent them from sinking, it’s essential to have separate compartments in the hull. A breach to one compartment can result in localised flooding, but the ship continues safely on its way because all of the other compartments are unaffected. In the new global paradigm, we’ve lost all the safety compartments and firewalls. The situation is RADICALLY UNSTABLE. Any event can sink the ship or burn down the whole building. It’s absolutely no coincidence that financial turmoil and excessive greed have reached unprecedented levels in the last twenty years. The scale of the gap between rich and poor that has appeared within this timescale is simply breathtaking. The number of major financial crashes that have occurred around the world in the last twenty years is without precedent. Yet no one in power has any idea of what’s really going on. They haven’t understood that we are perched over financial apocalypse because there are no safety mechanisms built into the global financial system. It’s like a nuclear reactor without a single control rod to moderate the chain reaction. And what happens to an uncontrolled nuclear process? – it explodes catastrophically. It’s a BOMB.

We are so close to Armageddon that it’s simply terrifying. And what’s even more terrifying is that the people charged with running the world are patently clueless about what’s really going on. They are driven by the markets and the markets are the detonator for the biggest financial explosion of all time. But who will challenge the markets? Who will face down the rich? Who will build firewalls, watertight safety bulkheads and insert sufficient control rods in the financial reactors? Well, NO ONE AT ALL.

We’re on a runaway train and we’re rapidly running out of track. The buffers are now right ahead of us. Be in no doubt at all, the final dialectical crisis is almost upon us. It cannot be avoided. The current system will definitely fail. It cannot save itself because it doesn’t know how to. It doesn’t understand itself. It will perish through ignorance. In the end, stupidity is a terminal condition.

The real issue is what is to be done when the shitstorm arrives. Who will pick up the pieces? To whom will the world turn? If the world were sane, it would of course turn to its sanest, most rational, most talented people, but, as we know all too well, the world is neither sane nor rational and anything could happen. We could get Fascist “strong man” dictators, or religious Messiahs. Fundamentalist Islam could sweep the world. All manner of nightmares are possible.

That’s why it’s critical for all sensible people to be ready to speak with a single voice and promote a single clear agenda. That’s why The Movement proved a monumental disappointment. Instead of preparing the agenda for a New Society, the members blabbered on about New Age bullshit, hippie crap and 9/11 garbage. In the end, several members of The Movement thought that their most important task was to investigate other members of The Movement and pronounce McCarthyite denunciations. What the fuck! When a group starts eating itself, you know it deserves to perish.

That’s the fast road to nowhere. We hoped people would write constitutions, declarations, that they would set up political groups and stand in elections, that they would seize the chance to prepare to implement a New World Order. Ho, ho, ho. No chance of that. It takes talented and smart people to do such things: a rare commodity within The Movement. Instead, there were legions of self-indulgent fantasists and bullshitters caught up in their own tiny, unimaginative worlds. How on earth could it serve anyone’s interests to open yet another thread on 9/11? Droning on about it will change nothing at all. Creating a New World Order will certainly change things…so why don’t you devote your time to that rather than to ludicrous, unproductive conspiracy theories?

“You will never get the crowd to cry Hosanna until you ride into town on an ass.”


Revolution Calling

Giugno 6th, 2019 No Comments   Posted in Mişcarea Dacia

‘Meritocracy is designed to be as fair as possible to everyone and it achieves that by ruthlessly preventing the transmission of extreme wealth between private individuals (usually from parents to their children). If your greatest desire is to inherit money earned by someone else rather than making it yourself through your own sweat and talent then you are no meritocrat. You’re a parasite, and meritocracy has nothing to offer deadbeats and freeloaders like you.

All people who accept inheritances are moochers, looters and deadheads. They know they could never succeed through their own efforts. They always need a leg up from others. These people are a joke. They would be sad losers if they weren’t propped up by their rich parents. They are spineless and worthless, the refuse and garbage of the Earth. All of these “inheritors” are terrified of a fair fight, of being deprived of an artificial advantage and genuinely having to be the best to win. They are cowards. In a fair race, they would be humiliated – and they know it!

Just as a nation would wish to have its best, most meritorious generals become the leaders of its military, so a meritocratic nation seeks to get the best economists in charge of its economy. Just as generals are public servants charged with winning military victories at minimum cost to their own side, so meritocratic economic generals will be public servants and their task is to create the greatest economic victories for the people with the fewest casualties (unlike capitalism). Being public servants, they are required to operate in the public good. The capitalist elite, by contrast, always operate in the private good (i.e. their own good).

With meritocratic capitalism, there could be no such phenomenon as “globalism” whereby rich capitalists go anywhere in the world where the best profits for themselves are to be had, and show zero loyalty to their nations of birth. Any capitalist who took his money out of his country to use it elsewhere would be deemed the equivalent of a general who started using his army for his own interests or even that of a foreign power, i.e. he would be deemed an outright traitor and be immediately arrested.

You either sign up with the anarcho-capitalist libertarians and let the rich elites explicitly rule everything and replace government wholesale, or you sign up with the meritocrats, and meritocratic government will replace market power and rich elites wholesale.
Rich dynastic elites will cease to exist in a meritocracy since it will be illegal for anyone to transfer significant assets to any other private individual. Only wealth transfers to the public (the Commonwealth) will be possible. In a meritocracy, the dead have no rights over the living and are prevented from selectively passing on their assets to their chosen ones. All the assets of the dead are transferred to the Commonwealth and meritocratically distributed in the cause of equal opportunities. No one will ever again find the game of life rigged against them by private transactions designed to favour a special few over everyone else.

Well, then, what shall you choose? Should the rich, private elites be permanently in charge, or should the people rule via meritocracy?

The rich elites have always been terrified of the Illuminati. They know that if we succeed, they will be out of business for good and all of their wealth will be reclaimed at death for the Commonwealth via 100% inheritance tax. It’s precisely because they fear us so much that they have gone to such lengths to demonize us through their puppets, stooges and shills such as Alex Jones, Henry Makow, Benjamin Fulford and David Icke. Icke even goes as far as to describe the Illuminati as shape-shifting lizards from another dimension. If you believe him, you’re in as much need of psychiatric help as he is. Bizarrely, the Illuminati have been branded as “the elite”, thus taking the heat away from the actual elite who are right in front of your face – all the capitalist billionaires who run the world.
The game couldn’t be simpler. Either we let the rich elite rule, or we remove their power and wealth and the people will rule … for the first time in history.

Power is very straightforward. To know who’s in charge, you need do only one thing … follow the money. Only when the people control the money and the money trail leads back to the people themselves will the people be in charge.
If you want the people to be in power, you must remove the wealth of the elite. It’s as blunt, basic and primordial as that. Are you for the rich elite or against them? Are you for equal opportunities or against them? You can have equal opportunities only if all economic, political and social systems of privilege, inheritance and heredity are crushed forever. 100% inheritance tax is the means by which everyone becomes their own master, dependent only on themselves. You should have zero expectation of anyone giving you hand-outs. Rich people condemn the State for providing welfare hand-outs to the poor while they themselves give hand-outs to their own children and cronies via trust funds and inheritance. You are pathetic if you accept welfare either from the State or from your parents, and meritocracy is designed to get rid of State and parental welfare by making everyone stand on their own two feet and control their own destiny.

Are you with us or against us? If you support what we stand for, join the Movement. Bring about a New World Order, a New Model Society, where the people are in charge and rich elites are dismantled permanently.

We seek only activists – those with true hero potential. If you don’t have it in you, don’t delude yourself. Stay at home and play your video games.

Remember, we’re not a debating society. This is about activism only. If you are not willing to get involved in doing things, stay away. The world will change because talented people will come forward and change it. These people will write, create, preach, convert, inspire, act, perform wonders, and through the sheer force of their will and talent, the world will bend before them.
Meritocrats are achievers. That’s what defines them. So, if you can achieve something glorious, welcome on board. Given that we are meritocrats and revere talent and achievement above all things, we will give you the chance to demonstrate your merit. We will monitor social media, and highlight on this page the efforts of anyone who is committed to genuine activism and is getting the Movement’s message out there. It’s not about us, it’s about you. It always has been.

What is the purpose of our activism? It’s to wake up the sleeping, sedated masses by exposing the fraud of democracy. It’s to end the spell of false consciousness that the rich elite have cast over the masses. It’s to bring an end to predatory, rapacious capitalism, capitalist globalism and international finance. These will be replaced by productive capitalism run by publicly elected and accountable experts working for the public good. Large-scale global capital will end. There will be no multinational, global corporate leviathans dictating to nation States and avoiding paying tax. Capitalism will be small-scale (think “Small Is Beautiful: A Study of Economics As If People Mattered” by E. F. Schumacher), and never greater than the nation State, whose interests it must serve rather than the private interests of super rich capitalists.

Everyone in the world must decide where they stand. Do you support the public or private good? Are you for or against inheritance? Are you for or against privilege (the opportunity afforded to the rich to buy competitive advantages over everyone else, particularly in respect of an elite private education for their children)? Are you a meritocrat or democrat? Are you for predatory capitalism (free-market capitalism) or productive capitalism (controlled by the nation State)? Are you for capitalist globalism or for the right of governments to be in charge rather than markets? Are you for positive or negative liberty? Are you for the General Will of the people or the particular will of the individual? Are you for nations being genuinely run by their people or by rich, unelected, unaccountable private elites? Do you admire the rich elites or despise them? Do you think that the rich and powerful should be in charge and that they are great Randian heroes? Do you support extreme private wealth and having a small group of super rich people owning the bulk of our world? Should Wall Street run the world or Main Street? Should the 1% rule or the 99%? Are you a libertarian? Are you an anarchist? Are you a communist? Are you a fascist? Make up your mind. Choose your side. Take action.

Why do most movements for change fail? It’s because their participants have no clear idea of what they stand for and what they really want. Enormous numbers of people with different agendas come together and then of course are unable to formulate a common way forward. They squabble and bicker and find that they have only one thing in common – the desire for something “better” than they have now. Yet they have no united vision of what this better thing will be, so each movement collapses under its own contradictions and internal tensions. And the rich elites just laugh and keep getting richer. They know they are invulnerable as long as the masses cannot agree, and they have taken great care to divide the masses as much as possible.
There’s only one real game in town – the rich elites versus the people. Who should rule? We have presented our vision of what should replace rule by the rich elites – meritocratic rule by the people. You will be either for us or against us. In your heart of hearts, you will be either a supporter of the rich elites (as Ayn Rand’s libertarians are), or want them removed from our world forever and power entrusted to the people, a principle that will be enshrined in the Constitution itself.

One measure crystallizes the entire debate – 100% inheritance tax (including the prevention of any attempts to evade this tax through trust funds or anything else). 100% inheritance tax reboots the world by destroying the wealth of dynastic families. The mentality of the world will change beyond recognition when people realize that they will never inherit a single cent from anyone else and that their success in life is their own business and no one else’s. At the moment, everyone who doesn’t have an effective network of nepotism and cronyism has no chance in life. Only when nepotism and cronyism are destroyed will the people of the highest merit – from any background – succeed.
So, above all else, the Movement must campaign for 100% inheritance tax. As a transitional measure, it might be tactically advantageous to apply 100% inheritance tax only to estates over, say, half a million dollars. But, in the end, meritocracy is defined by 100% inheritance tax across the board. That’s the only way to guarantee equal opportunities for all. The rich are welcome to spend all of their money on luxuries for themselves. Anything not spent by the time of death goes to the Commonwealth to be invested in the public good. What could be simpler, nobler, fairer or more moral?

We already know that many, many people despise 100% inheritance tax. To all those people, we say this … whether you think so or not, you are opposed to the public good, you are for the private elites, you support nepotism and cronyism, you are against equal opportunities and meritocracy. So, why don’t you man up and take responsibility for your pernicious beliefs? Declare yourself anti-meritocratic. Say that you agree that deadbeats like Paris Hilton should be allowed to inherit vast fortunes despite having done nothing to earn them. Say that you revere bloodlines over justice, fairness and merit. Say you support privilege. Don’t pretend to be something you’re not. Don’t live in bad faith. Don’t pretend to be moral and interested in the good of others. Confess that you are a libertarian egoist. Admit that you hate government in principle and resent even one cent of taxation. Grow a spine and tell the world that you hate it and all your love is directed towards yourself, your family, your cronies and your God … and everyone else can go screw themselves.

Know thyself, said the ancient Greeks. So, know who you are and what you really stand for, not what you fondly imagine you stand for. Choose your sides. 100% inheritance tax is the single tax that defines what side you’re truly on. You can’t fake support for this tax. You either agree with it or you don’t. You either want the meritocratic people to be in charge or the privileged elites that will use their money at every turn to anti-meritocratically buy competitive advantages for them and theirs. Inheritance is never anything other than an unearned competitive advantage. That’s all it can ever be. If you’re for inheritance, you’re for privilege and against merit. That’s the inescapable bottom line. There’s no conceivable meritocratic defence for inheritance.

It’s obscene that a nation such as America that worships inheritance and privilege should imagine that it is in any way meritocratic. America is a shameless, anti-meritocratic plutocracy where you have close to zero chance of succeeding in life if you don’t come from a privileged family and no competitive advantage has been purchased for you by your parents. The “great American novel” – The Great Gatsby – is all about how an outsider, no matter how ostensibly successful, will never be accepted by the elite and will always be destroyed by the elite.

The world divides into two types of people – those who support the public good and those who support the private good. The former have a positive attitude towards the concept of community, society, government and the State. If government is failing disastrously, it’s not because there’s an inherent problem with government but rather with those who typically form the government – who are usually advocates of the private good and out to feather their own nests.

Those who support the private good are opposed to community, society, government and the State. The monstrous UK prime minister Margaret Thatcher (who proclaimed, “There is no such thing as society.”) was someone who hated the State and wanted to destroy it. The British rich prospered to an astonishing degree under her rule. Plainly, a government led by someone such as Thatcher is not advancing the public good one iota. For Thatcher and all supporters of the private good, there are only individuals and families, and government should stay out of their lives as much as possible. Minimal state intervention is known as “negative liberty” while significant State intervention is known as “positive liberty”. Meritocracy is a positive liberty system since it actively seeks to destroy the power of private elites and dynastic families that promote nepotism and cronyism. People such as anarchists, libertarians, conservatives and free-market capitalists are advocates of the private good over the public good and are proponents of negative liberty.

In short, all authentic left wingers support the public good and all right wingers the private good (hence rule by rich private elites and dynastic families). Centrists are clueless compromisers.
All democratic nations have at least two main political parties, one broadly left wing and one broadly right wing. In America, the Democrats are nominally on the left (but are actually centrists), the Republicans are on the right and the libertarians on the far right. America has barely had any meaningful contact with true left wing politics. That might have been very different had the great Illuminatus Thomas Jefferson – a radical Jacobin – enjoyed unchallenged power in America. America would now be a left wing meritocracy devoted to the public good and reflecting the values of Plato’s Republic and Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Social Contract. Tragically, Jefferson’s time as President went to waste as America chose instead to deify the private good and particular will over the public good and General Will. America has been ruled by a rich elite ever since, and it makes not one jot of a difference if the Democrats or Republicans are in power.
America, instinctively, is extremely right wing, libertarian and religiously fundamentalist. It’s full of rampant egoism, narcissism and the cult of the individual who fears only his “God”. America is the champion of unfettered capitalism and capitalism is the economic system of the private good (rule by rich elites). No country on Earth is more in need of a revolution than America. It has the greatest degree of false consciousness to be found anywhere. It’s even worse than Islamic countries! The “American Dream” is one of the most insidious delusions of all time.
America is a WASP plutocracy being ruled from Washington D.C., the heart of WASP power. America is a Judaeo-Masonic unholy alliance of Washington D.C. political power and Wall Street financial power. The Wall Street Jews and the WASP Freemasons of Washington D.C. are the true axis of evil in our world. From them came the gospel of capitalist globalization that is ruining all of our lives, and ensuring that only the rich can have power.

The WASPs and the Jews are united in their slavish devotion to the family, to nepotism, cronyism and privilege. They are religious fanatics. The Jews are extremist Zionists who believe they are the “Chosen People”, and the WASP Masons are extremist Protestants who believe themselves the elect and the saved. They think they have a divine right to rule and that civilization would collapse without them.

It’s up to the rest of us to show them that we – pagans and heathens – are the divine ones and to cast down their false Gods and idols, their Abrahamic devils and demons. Jesus and Zion must fall.’


Nu este disponibilă nicio descriere pentru fotografie.
Este posibil ca imaginea să conţină: noapte

Videoconferinţa Mişcării Dacia din 05.06.2019

Giugno 5th, 2019 No Comments   Posted in Mişcarea Dacia


Giugno 3rd, 2019 No Comments   Posted in Mişcarea Dacia


1. Faptul că IUDEO-CRE(Ş)TINISMUL este o religie străină de SPIRITUL
ÎNAINTAŞILOR noştri, nu mai are nevoie de explicaţii, deoarece le-am dat deja în materialele
2. Faptul că IUDEO-CRE(Ş)TINISMUL este FALS şi este de fapt o NĂSCOCIRE a semiticului
PAUL (Pavel) bazată pe amestecarea IUDAISMULUI cu RELIGIILE GNOSTICE anterioare
(Egiptene, Sumeriene, Elenice, Getice), din nou, argumente în sprijinul afirmaţiei noastre se pot
regăsi parţial în Trilogie şi pe larg în cele peste 150 de Cărţi ILLUMINATI.
3. Aşa cum susţin şi ILLUMINATI, „o Religie nu poate dispare, fără a pune altceva în loc” şi asta
deoarece există o „majoritate democratică” înclinată spre MYTHOS/NARATIVĂ şi deloc spre
LOGOS/RAŢIUNE. Aceasta trebuie „adusă treptat pe Calea Adevărului Matematic”, pentru a se
pune bazele HIPERUMANITĂŢII. Nu întâmplător, unul din TESTELE accederii în ILLUMINATI
înlocuiască pe actualele bazate pe Paradigma STĂPÂN-SCLAV. Zicem „actualele”, deoarece noi nu
suntem de acord nici cu filosofiile/religiile orientale. Nu suntem de acord cu nimic ce are la bază
Crezul, nu Rațiunea, Logica.
Noua Religie „va ucide toţi Dumnezeii Vechi” şi va fi „în pas” cu Noile Cunoştinţe din domeniul
(J.J.ROUSSEAU – „Contractul Social”).
4. În toată Lumea asistăm la o reîntoarcere a „PĂGÂNISMULUI”, ca semn al neîncrederii tot mai
accentuale în actualele RELIGII MAJORE. Omenirea a rătăcit CALEA şi se întoarce treptat din
Drumul ce duce spre EXTINCŢIE.
5. Fără îndoială, strămoşii noştri GEŢI erau GNOSTICI:
– Toate TRADIŢIILE NAŢIONALE actuale au SIMBOLURI specifice provenind din adâncul
timpurilor, străine de cele ale unor „Tribali Din Deşert”: Codrul, Râul, Focul Purificator, Pileusul
Merituoşilor, Sica (secera), Falxul (coasa), Fauna şi Flora (Ursul, Lupul, Mistreţul, Cerbul, Cocoşul
de Munte, Ciocârlia, Floarea de Colţ, Ştejarul, Bradul, Fagul, Nucul, Grâul, Busuiocul, Usturoiul,
Vinul şi Ţuica şamd.).
– Se credeau NEMURITORI, cu referire la SUFLET/MINTE/MONADĂ (corpul incinerat
neputându-se considera astfel decât în aberanta religie iudeo-cre(ş)tină).
– Plângeau la Naştere şi se bucurau la Moarte, conştienţi fiind că Sufletul/Mintea/Monada e
„prizonieră în Corp/Materie/Universul Dimensional”, care este RĂU prin definiţie (vezi Trilogia
pentru detalii). Astfel se explică şi sacrificiul „mesagerilor către zei”, precum şi NEÎNFRICAREA
în faţa MORŢII.
Herodot, în ”Istorii”:
”Despre obiceiurile pe care le au Geții, care își închipuie că sunt nemuritor, am vorbit. La Trausi
găsim aceleași datini ca și la restul Tracilor – în afara celor legate de naștere și de moarte, când
fac ceea ce voi arăta. Rudele stau în jurul nou-născutului și plâng nenorocirile care va trebui să le
îndure nou-născutul, odată ce a venit pe lume. Sunt pomenite atunci toate suferințele omenești.
Când moare cineva, Trausii îl îngroapă glumind și bucurându-se. Cu acest prilej, se amintesc
nenorocirile de care scapă omul și arată cât este el de fericit în toate privințele”.
Obiceiul de a se distra la priveghiul răposaților s-a păstrat până nu demult în ținutul Vrancei şi nu
numai. A se vedea în acest context şi Cimitirul Vesel de la Săpânţa.
– Trăiau în COMUNITATE fără discrepanţe în Redistribuirea Resurselor.
– Nu exista Ereditarea Averilor (Moştenirea, deoarece aveau PROPRIETATEA ÎN DEVĂLMĂŞIE.
– Conceptele de FAMILIE şi MORALA erau corespunzătoare Principiilor Gnostice.
– Nu aveau SCLAVI, în afara agresorilor puşi să-şi răscumpere Păcatul de a fi atacat un Popor
Paşnic, dar Necruţător cu Duşmanii.
– Nu porneau RĂZBOAIE DE CUCERIRE a altor Neamuri, ci doar de APĂRARE. Erau PACIFICI.
– Trăgeu cu arcul în „Zeii Răi”, deoarece se considerau ei înşişi Divini.
– Conducerea COMUNITĂŢII era de tip MASA ROTUNDĂ (Sfatul Bătrânilor/Înţelepţilor), unde
cei mai MERITUOŞI ajungeau, în lipsa PRIVILEGIULUI de orice alt fel.
– Circulă în Internet LEGILE LUI ZAMOLXE, care nu au aproape nimic în comun cu Legile Iudeo-
Cre(ş)tinismului. Unii vor spune că sunt INVENŢII, dar Adevărurile cuprinse în ele sunt fărăîndoială NESTEMATE ale Conştienţei Colective a Neamului Nostru. Pe de altă parte, TOATE
RELIGIILE sunt „invenţii” din anumite perioade istorice, după cum rezultă din materialele noastre
6. Noua Religie va fi o Sinteză Superioară a tuturor religiilor „păgâne” ce vor fi puse în sintonie
între ele, dar şi cu noile CUNOŞTINŢE acumulate de omenire până în prezent. Ea va avea astfel un
Caracter Universal. Va fi ceea ce şi ILLUMINATI preconizează: O Nouă Religie care va pune în
centrul „Dogmei” sale DIVINITATEA OMULUI. Dogma este cuprinsă între ghilimele deoarece
definiţia sa nu va fi atât de restrictivă precum o declară actualele dicţionare: orice poate fi pus în
discuţie în Noul Zamolxianism, bineînţeles folosind Argumente Raţionale şi Logice. Nimic din ce e
omenesc nu e deasupra Spiritului Critic.
Caracteristici ale Noului Zamolxianism
– DIVINITATEA OMULUI va sta în Centrul Dogmei.
– SCOPUL Neo-Zamolxianismului este CREAREA UNEI COMUNITĂŢI DE ZEI, deoarece noi
toţi avem POTENŢIALUL pentru aşa ceva.
– Nu va avea Biserici, ci Biblioteci.
– Nu va avea Preoţi, ci Competenţi din toate domeniile care-şi vor împărtăşi dezinteresat
– Nu va avea „Cărţi Sfinte”, ci Cărţi De Text pentru toate domeniile.
– Nu va exista o entitate socială, o formă organizatorică sau o entitate, ci doar Principii și Spirit!
– Mulţi preoţi ortodocşi vor înţelege necesitatea „Redescoperirii Rădăcinilor Sufocate De Bălării” şi
vor contribui la Marea Schimbare Spirituală… alţii, cei mânaţi de MAMMON şi de YHWH, vor
dispare din Viaţa Spirituală A Neamului.
– Actualele Lăcaşuri De Cult vor deveni Centre De Perfecţionare Culturală, Ştiinţifică, Psihologică,
Filosofică, Spirituală, Muzee, Sanatorii, Spitale, Şcoli, Biblioteci şamd.
– Proprietăţile actualei Biserici Ortodoxe sau ale altor Culte, vor trece în FOLOSINŢĂ INDIVIZĂ a
comunităţilor locale.
– TRADIŢIILE vor fi „eliberate” de Dogmele, Denaturările şi Mistificările actuale şi-şi vor recăpăta
Desigur că mulţi vor spune că suntem Nebuni, dar niciunul din aceştia nu ar spune-o despre
PAUL/PAVEL, iudeul care a inventat CRE(Ş)TINISMUL!?
Dacă el a putut s-o facă, noi, urmaşii Geţilor Carpato-Balcano-Dunăreano-Pontici, de ce nu am
putea s-o facem, mai ales că se va trata de o REVENIRE la ceva ce a fost, „sincronizată” la actualul
Stadiu De Evoluţie A Umanităţii!?
Numai cine Cunoaşte măcar la nivel generalist ISTORIA RELIGIILOR poate pricepe demersul
nostru.Numai cine a priceput că suntem pe o CORABIE A NEBUNILOR poate să-şi imagineze O NOUĂ
LUME. Noi suntem PIRAŢII!
Numai cine a accesat CUNOAŞTEREA şi combate IGNORANŢA poate înţelege
MERITOCRAŢIA ILUMINISTĂ şi demersurile legate de aceasta.
Numai cine a citit măcar o parte din Cărţile ILLUMINATI ştie că această Nouă Religie este deja
deliniată pe baza unei EVOLUŢII MULTIMILENARE.
„Numai cine ştie cât de departe poate ajunge, va ajunge acolo!”
Aşteptăm ca Teologi şi Istorici ai Religiilor să preia iniţiativa şi să înscrie noua Religie la
Secretariatul de Stat pentru Culte, cu specificarea faptului că adepţii NU au BISERICI, ci
BIBLIOTECI, NU au CLER, ci GENII ALE OMENIRII din toate domeniile, NU au „CĂRŢI
SFINTE”, ci CĂRŢI DE TEXT de Filosofie, Psihologie, Matematică Ontologică, Mecanică
Cuantică, Ştiinţe, Cultură, Istoria Religiilor şamd. şi că nu solicită nicio FINANŢARE de la Stat.
ZAMOLXIANISMUL e cea mai veche Religie a băştinaşilor acestui pământ şi trebuie recunoscut
fără doar şi poate!
Fiind actualizată această Religie cu CUNOAŞTEREA acumulată de Omenire şi fiind permanent
actualizată şi în viitor, se va numi de azi încolo NOUL ZAMOLXIANISM şi se va încadra în


Giugno 3rd, 2019 No Comments   Posted in Mişcarea Dacia


Toate Religiile Majore sunt TOXICE şi au alimentat miliarde de CRIME, deci trebuie
interzise, dacă vrem să facem pasul spre HiperUmanitate, dacă vrem să mergem Spre Stele. Cu
IGNORANŢII, avem ZERO şanse să mergem Spre Stele!!! Unii oameni, printre care şi mulţi
intelectuali remarcabili, dându-şi seama că propria religie avraamică este Rătăcire, s-au aruncat ca
berbecii în Religiile Orientale în căutare de „Pace şi Iubire” şi… Iluminare. Din păcate au căzut din
lac în puţ, deoarece tot de o Rătăcire au parte. Numai simplul fapt al tolerării Castelor şi mai ales a
castei „Celor De Neatins” (The Untouchables) dărâmă orice pretenţie de Peace and Love, sau de
„Pentru un motiv bizar, adepții religiilor orientale cred că au un monopol asupra Iluminării.
Ei bine, nu au. Ei sunt la fel de departe de Iluminare ca Avraamicii.
Luați în considerare următoarea imagine: Buddha stând sub copacul Bodhi, meditând. Se
pretinde că aici el a obținut Iluminarea. Sau așa spune el. Desigur, el nu a putut dovedi această
afirmație – trebuie doar să-l Credeţi pe cuvânt.Aceasta este diferența mare dintre Budism (și religiile orientale sau religiile în general) și
Iluminism şi Hiperianism. Nu vă vom cere niciodată să luați ceva pe Credință.
Să fim clari de ceva: Șezutul sub un copac, NICIODATĂ nu vă va furniza Iluminarea.
Meditația NICIODATĂ nu vă va oferi Iluminarea. Numai Studiul poate face asta –
Meditația este adesea numită „Mindfulness” (Minte Împlinită). Acesta este exact opusul a
ceea ce este. Este Mindlessness (Minte Golită). Mindfulness ar fi ceva care îți umple mintea – cum
ar fi Studiul!
Karmiștii merg adesea la „retrageri spirituale” de 10 zile, unde stau în tăcere și meditează.
Dacă s-ar expune la un curs riguros de filozofie de zece zile, ei ar fi infinit mai aproape de
Iluminare. Dar este mult prea greu. E nevoie de prea multă muncă. Este mult mai ușor să fii un tată
denaturat, ca și Buddha care şi-a părăsit soția și copilul nou-născut ca să caute „Iluminarea”
meditând sub un copac. Este mult mai greu de a fi un filozof pe măsura lui Platon sau Leibniz,
deoarece asta înseamnă, de fapt, să fii Educat, să fi Studiat.
Aici este Înțelepciunea: Educația = Iluminarea. Și este nevoie de Muncă. Mulță Muncă.
Tu, Buddha burtos, ai condus miliarde de oameni în Rătăcire cu sistemul tău de Pasivitate.
Ai înșelat oamenii să creadă că Interpretarea și Experiența ta personală sunt Adevăruri. Ai făcut
mult rău psihicului omenesc, iar religia voastră grotescă, ca toate celelalte religii majore, va fi
nimicită în timp util.” – By N3mesis – Iluminist

Desigur că o imensă masă de oameni, Turma cum mai poate fi definită, se va scandaliza de
aceste rânduri, dar pe noi nu ne interesează popularitatea şi nici Emoţiile şi Senzaţiile acesteia. Pot
spune că adevăratul Patriotism este acesta: a arăta Proştilor cât de Proşti sunt şi cât Rău pot face nu
numai Naţiunii, ci şi întregii Omeniri. Azi Proştii se cred Deştepţi, pentru că Politicienii, Elita
Intelectuală, Biserica, Organele Mediatice, Statul, le spun astfel, ascunzând ADEVĂRUL.
Democraţia este cel mai elocvent exemplu de cum Proştilor li se dă impresia că ar conta ceva în
soarta omenirii. FALS! Sunt doar o „masă de SCLAVI” în slujba unei Elite Individualiste,
Materialiste, Întunecate.
Mulţi „oameni de bine” vor contra-argumenta că nu Religiile sunt „de vină”, ci Clerul
corupt. Fals. Trebuie eliminat ceea ce aceştia propăvăduiesc, deoarece problema e de Fond, nu de
Suprafaţă. E ca şi cum s-ar susţine că nu Capitalismul e de vină, ci Capitaliştii. Aceştia nu ar mai
avea posibilitatea Exploatării Popoarelor în lipsa Capitalismului.
Iluminiştii Pitagoreici nu sunt însă ATEI, cum unii cred în mod greşit.
ATEISMUL este pentru noi tot o Religie, bazată pe CREDINŢA că Dumnezeu nu există, fără a
putea proba INEXISTENŢA acestuia. Paradoxal, ateii sunt adepţii MATERIALISMULUI
EMPIRICIST şi nu ar putea afirma ceva fără PROBE MATERIALE. Ei ignoră MINTEA şi iau în
consideraţie exclusiv MATERIA, spre deosebire de noi, care suntem IDEALIŞTI-RAŢIONALIŞTI
şi afirmăm că MATERIA este „rodul” MINŢII. Pentru noi, Universul are două componente:Universul Adimensional şi Universul Dimensional, aflate în etern proces dialectic, în vreme ce
pentru atei, există numai cel Dimensional. Pentru atei, MINTEA este rezultatul unor reacţii chimice
din creier, în timp ce noi considerăm creierul doar o „antenă”, un „decodificator” al Universului
Adimensional, unde sălăşluieşte MINTEA.
Fundamental, ateii sunt „sclavii” SIMŢURILOR, în vreme ce noi suntem adepţii LOGICII şi
RAŢIUNII şi demonstrăm din plin că SIMŢURILE sunt ÎNŞELĂTOARE.
Duşmanii Iluminismului sunt în linii mari, doi: MAMMON (Banul) şi YHWH (Religiile Majore).
Împotriva lui MAMMON deja am definitivat O Nouă Paradigmă Socio-Economică ce poate fi
cunoscută din Trilogia publicată deja. Tot acolo pot fi cunoscute Aberaţiile Religiilor Majore actuale
ce fac parte integrală din actuala Veche Ordine Mondială (OWO).
„Natura nu face Salturi, ci Transformările se fac treptat” spunea Marele Maestru Illuminati
LEIBNIZ, iată de ce MIŞCAREA DACIA lansează o nouă Iniţiativă: INVENTAREA UNEI NOI
RELIGII: NOUL ZAMOLXIANISM. Acesta va asigura „trecerea treptată” la o nouă Filosofie A
Existenţei de factură Iluminstă.
Din nou, „pulimea şi pizdimea” va RĂDE!?… noi vom „râde” la urmă!!!
Oricum, de dată ce TOATE RELIGIILE sunt de factură omenească, tot aşa vom proceda şi noi, dar
spre deosebire de Religiile Majore actuale, o vom face fără intenţiile care stau în spatele acestora, ci
cu Scopul Declarat Al Creării Unei Comunităţi De Zei.

(va urma)