Dacia Iluministă

What Sane Woman would be a Muslim?:

As we mentioned, Islamic Sharia Law declares that the testimony of two women is the equivalent of that of one man, so in any trial where it’s a man’s word against a woman’s (in a case of sexual assault or rape, for example), the man automatically wins. That’s Islamic justice for you. Read this account from an Islamic website of why “God” designed things this way, for women’s “benefit” (!)

Question: Why do women have half the men’s right of testimony?

Answer: The essentials which form the fundamentals of the Islamic Law are based on revelation (of Allah). They are outlined in the Quran. In other words, the legal essentials are established and ordained by the Creator of the Universe. Whatever the age, atmosphere and circumstances in which one lives, those essentials are the source of peace and means of comfort. This is because these decrees are the most suitable ones for man’s creation. When the decrees and jurisdiction in the Quran are studied, the outstanding point is that both corporeal and spiritual existence of man is taken into consideration.

In the matter of witnessing, it is possible to observe that, too. The translation of the verse about giving testimony is as follows…

And call upon two (Muslim) men among you as witnesses. If two men are not there, then let there be one man and two women, from among those of whom you approve as witnesses, that if either of the two women errs (through forgetfulness), the other may remind her.

So, here, the basic matter is directly related to the creation of women. This is a requisite of their psychological aspect. The underlying disposition of woman is excitement and she lives with her excitements. Therefore, ideas get rooted in her heart rather than her mind and develop effects in this way. She cannot really remain unbiased in the face of events. She approaches phenomena with intuition as her conscience and mercy prevail.

Due to that quality of theirs, the Quran says: Women may forget, therefore they should be given helpers in testimony. It is expressed by Allah the Almighty who created the woman. So, it is an unchanging rule. Are there not among women those who do not easily forget and those who have sharper memories than men? Of course, there are, but generally, this psychological state is seen in women more often. It is just natural that they cannot retain events in their memories long. On the other hand, the woman is more introverted. She has a world of her own. She is busy with the housework all day. She takes care of children and of their upbringing. Very few women are interested in trade, business, and politics. How will a woman who is so away from the outer world be aware of the events that take place there, how will she learn about them and retain them in her mind and to what extent will she be able to bear witness?

By accepting two women’s testimonies equal to that of one man, and thus not burdening the woman with the responsibility as much as that of the man in the matter of witnessing, Islam does not harm her right, on the contrary, protects it and prevents her from sinning. This is because bearing witness is a tough duty that brings about great responsibilities.

******

Are we clear now? Allah himself made Islamic women dumb, forgetful and half as reliable (and intelligent?) as men. There’s no point in complaining. Women’s lib won’t get you anywhere. Allah ain’t listening. Islamic women have allowed themselves to be devoured by the wolves, so they deserve everything they get. Any sane, rational woman should regard Islam as the uttermost insult to women.
__________

Wolf Theory:

WOLF THEORY ASSERTS that the whole of the human condition is defined by the five percent of the human race who are dominant: the human wolves. They are aggressive, assertive, dynamic, bold, attack-minded, determined, driven, adventurous, combative, uncompromising, active, on the front foot, always making things happen, entrepreneurial, get up and go. They set the agenda. The remaining 95% of the human race are the tame, timid, domesticated, docile, mediocre “dog” humans, looking to curl up in front of the fire near their master, be patted on the head, and have their belly rubbed. They are unambitious, unadventurous, unimaginative, defined by their desire to have an easy a life as possible involving minimum effort. They don’t like conflict and always seek compromise. They never drive the agenda. They are reactive, passive, always waiting for things to happen, always on the back foot. They follow the agenda of others. They don’t have the ability or will to create their own agenda.

So, what are you – wolf or dog?

The Old World Order are wolves, defined by their extraversion, love of luxury, wealth and privilege. They are entirely driven by materialistic power and status.

The Illuminati are also wolves, but on the introverted side of the equation. They are driven by idealism and desire to master abstract ideas and discover the absolute truth of existence. They have almost no interest in materialism and find status games pathetic. The Illuminati wolves blame the OWO wolves for all the ills of the world. The OWO wolves love exploiting the dogs and making them do their bidding. The Illuminati wolves despise the willingness of the dogs to eat the shit of the OWO. The Illuminati proclaim the doctrine of everyone becoming God. Why? Because the OWO would have no power in a Community of Gods – there would be no dogs to serve them. A Community of Gods would, on the other hand, conform with the agenda of the Illuminati – to assume conscious control of the entire universe and understand every aspect of it.

We are not at all interested in either real dogs or human dogs – they are incapable of advancing our agenda in any way. As for the ultimate wolf philosopher, he is not an Illuminatus at all, nor a member of the OWO. He is Friedrich Nietzsche, the prophet of the Will to Power, a supremely wolverine concept.

Cesare Borgia was an archetypal wolf and Nietzsche expressed these opinions about him: We fundamentally misunderstand the predatory animals and predatory men, for example, Cesare Borgia, and we misunderstand nature, so long as we still look for a ‘pathology’ at the bottom of these healthiest of all tropical monsters and growths or even for some hell born in them, as almost all moralists so far have done. It seems that among moralists there is a hatred for the jungle and the tropics? And the ‘tropical man’ must at all accounts be discredited, whether as a sickness and degeneration of human beings or as his own hell and self-torture? But why? For the benefit of the ‘moderate zones’? For the benefit of the moderate human beings? The “moral human beings”? The mediocre? This for the chapter ‘morality as timidity.’

I see a spectacle so rich in significance and at the same time so wonderfully full of paradox that it should arouse all the gods on Olympus to immortal laughter-Cesare Borgia as pope! One altogether misunderstands the beast of prey and man of prey (Cesare Borgia for example), one misunderstands ‘nature’, when one looks for something ‘sick’ at the bottom of these healthiest of all monsters, as virtually all moralists have done.

As long as there have been human beings there have been human herds (families, tribes, nations, states, churches), and always very many who obey and very few who command. Nothing has been cultivated among men better than obedience; ‘thou shalt unconditionally do this, unconditionally not do that’. Those commanding have to deceive themselves that they too are only obeying; I call it the moral hypocrisy of commanders. They defend themselves by posing as executors of more ancient or higher commands (of ancestors, the constitution, justice, the law or even of God), or borrow the herd’s way of thinking and appear as ‘servants of the people’, or ‘instruments of the common good’. The herd-man in Europe today glorifies his qualities of timidity, modesty, industriousness, and peace which make him useful to the herd. And when leaders seem to be indispensable, the clever herdsmen gather together; this is the origin of all parliamentary constitutions. What a release from burden, was the appearance of an unconditional commander for this herd-European; Napoleon!

******

If we refer to the Illuminati as good wolves (dedicated to mastering the cosmos rather than mastering people) and the Old World Order as bad wolves (devoted to dominating and enslaving people), the history of the world because the history of the conflict between good and bad wolves. The good wolves are the philosophers, scientists, mathematicians, psychologists, artists, writers, poets, designers, academics, visionaries, revolutionaries, radicals, engineers and technologists while the bad wolves are the monarchs, emperors, dictators, tyrants, generals, prophets, religious leaders, entrepreneurs, feudal lords, capitalists, aristocrats, nobility, privileged elites, business magnates, media moguls, bankers, financiers, advertisers, lawyers, political leaders, conservatives and celebrities.

The good-wolf/bad-wolf dialectic has driven our world. The bad wolves are determined to oppress, repress, control, enslave, exploit, manipulate and dominate the submissive dog people. They have had no desire to share resources, but to take as much as possible for themselves (hence why so much of the world’s wealth is in the hands of so few). They are extraordinarily narcissistic, egotistical, conceited, arrogant, dismissive and contemptuous of others. They think they deserve the best, and fuck everyone else. The good wolves have always sought to enlighten the masses, to improve the quality of life, to raise the standard of knowledge, to promote reason and logic, to raise general well-being. The wolves are the major chess pieces and the dogs are the pawns, being pushed hither and thither.

Bad wolves are predators and tame dogs are their prey. Capitalism is a supremely rapacious, ruthless economic system: perfect for the bad wolves to devour the weak and helpless. Gordon Gekko’s immortal Greed is good speech is the perfect summation of the bad wolf ideology. Wall Street is a perfect bad wolf movie, and shows what is required of you if you wish to join the wolves gnawing the bones of the dead dogs. Bad wolves are often glamorous and charismatic figures, envied by all the tame dogs since they seem so confident and in charge and are getting exactly what they want from life, even if it means trampling everyone else into the dirt.

Good wolves are usually on the periphery of life, locked away in ivory towers, laboratories or in lonely garrets where they struggle in isolation or in small teams with the great mysteries of the earth and the cosmos. They are largely ignored by the world until one of their ideas detonates and changes the world irrevocably. The answer to changing the world for the better is astoundingly simple – destroy the bad wolves. This was the strategy adopted by the Illuminists Robespierre and Saint-Just in the French Revolutionary “Terror”. The king and the aristocracy who had so viciously preyed on the people were guillotined. The counter-revolutionaries who supported the bad wolf regime went the same way. Unfortunately, France was plunged into war with all of the major monarchies of Europe who wanted to kill off this Republican monstrosity in their midst, so there was no opportunity for the Illuminati to build a brand new society. War dominated everything and so a warrior soon came to power – Napoleon. Although he can claim some credits, Napoleon was simply a new type of bad wolf. Bad wolves are the bane of the world. Any rational society would identify these bad wolves in childhood and seek to sublimate their negative tendencies in positive pursuits. Society should implement specific laws to curb the ability of bad wolves to rise to the top.

Not all bad wolves are seen for what they are. Steve Jobs is greatly admired by many people. In a British newspaper, journalist Michael Bywater wrote, “Cool, by its very nature, is something which it should not be possible to mass-produce. Steve Jobs is the man who industrialised cool.” Of course, the original assertion is correct: cool CANNOT be mass-produced. Steve Jobs didn’t do anything “cool”. He was a greedy capitalist who saw how to industrialise the capitalist appearance of “cool” for legions of sad fuck human dogs who have to have the latest gadget (even though they never do anything worthwhile with all of these gadgets they own). There’s no difference between Microsoft and Apple: two ruthless capitalist leviathans trying to part tame dogs from their money. How anyone can use “cool” in the context of one of the richest corporations on earth is simply breath-taking. Apple products are shit. They offer nothing to the world. What has Apple achieved other than make endless millions of people spend all of their time glued to gadgets, and doing NOTHING productive. Apple has massively expanded the scope for people to twitter and bellyache endlessly. The air crackles with endless moronic trivia. Is that what people call PROGRESS?!!

Capitalist technology mostly revolves around how to expand the exchange of BULLSHIT exponentially. Airheads and retards have never had so much scope for expressing their empty, pointless thoughts. The world is awash with mind pollution, with toxic memes. Huge cyber garbage dumps are everywhere, filled to bursting with the collected “thoughts” of those who can’t think. They can’t think because they spend so much time frittering away their time with their shiny gadgets rather than learning anything and developing a skill.

There has only ever been one true route to meaningful achievement – that most unpopular of undertakings, HARD WORK. Not all the gadgets on earth will help you if you are a mediocre, lazy, stupid dog. The morons should dump their gadgets and read a book! But of course, that wouldn’t be “cool”. And we must all seek to be cool in the way that makes immense amounts of money for Steve Jobs, mustn’t we? If we don’t conform to capitalist cool then we can never be cool, right?! All Big Bad Wolf institutions and individuals are easy to spot – they have immense wealth and influence and they never talk about wealth redistribution. They always sing the praises of “profit”. Steve Jobs is no different.
__________

The London Riots, a “Bad Wolf” Case Study:

For a few days, law and order broke down in the capital of the United Kingdom, one of the world’s most powerful nations. The London police were exposed as inept and ineffectual, clueless and impotent in the face of widespread disorder and looting. One of the most intriguing aspects of the London riots was that it was overwhelmingly perpetrated by young black men. This was plain to see in endless pictures of the event. However, no politician or media commentator wanted to talk about the racial angle, and their bacon was saved when other British cities rioted, and in some of these cases the rioters were overwhelmingly white.

However, a prominent and controversial TV historian called Dr David Starkey jumped in where angels fear to tread, making comments deemed so racist that several observers declared that he had committed career suicide. He made the statement that in the UK all successful blacks are effectively white i.e. they consciously or subconsciously imitate prominent whites. Conversely, unsuccessful whites consciously or subconsciously imitate prominent “bad boy” blacks. Cue media outrage.

Starkey stated, ‘What has happened is that a substantial section of the chavs [members of the UK underclass]…have become black. The whites have become black. A particular sort of violent, destructive, nihilistic gangster culture has become the fashion.” On the subject of black street language, Starkey said, “Black and white, boy and girl, operate in this language together. This language, which is wholly false, which is this Jamaican patois that has intruded in England…This is why so many of us have this sense of literally a foreign country.” Starkey commenting on David Lammy, Labour Member of Parliament for Tottenham where the riots began (following the fatal shooting of an armed black man who didn’t seem to be given any chance to surrender), said, “Listen to David Lammy, an archetypal successful black man. If you turn the screen off, as if you were listening to him on radio, you would think he was white.”

In one of our previous articles, we wrote:

A book called The History of White People by black American historian Nell Irvin Painter has argued, convincingly, that Barack Obama is white, and this has nothing to do with the fact that his mother is white. Obama has basically found himself motoring along on the “white side” of the track i.e. his education is typical of that of a patrician white, as are his income, his power, his status, and that was true long before he became President. It was easy for many whites to vote for him because, as they recognised, he was effectively white himself. Would those whites who voted for Obama also have voted for someone like the Reverend Wright? Not a chance.

Painter’s point is that race is a social construct, subject to the forces of fashion. Many whites, attracted by the “bad boy” image of black rappers, have adopted black cultural values. Painter has argued that well-connected, prosperous blacks can be “white”, while disadvantaged whites are indistinguishable from disadvantaged blacks, if you ignore their skin colour and focus on how they conduct their lives, and how they are treated by society. Can anyone deny that President Obama sounds much more like a white professor than a black rapper?

We regard Starkey and Painter’s case as unarguable. The question isn’t whether it’s true or not – it plainly is – but to understand how it came about and what can be done about it. And, in fact, the issue isn’t really one of race at all, but of education.

Consider the following hypothetical case of a young black man whose father has jumped ship and plays no part in his upbringing. He’s in a one-parent home and his mother is out all day working for the minimum wage as she packs shelves in a supermarket. She is exhausted when she comes home and just wants to watch soap operas to relax. She has no time for her son, though she dutifully tells him to work hard at school, respect his teachers and make something of himself. She herself is uneducated and barely literate. She can’t give her son any help with his schoolwork and she doesn’t provide an educational environment where books are respected.

The young black man is not at all academic. He hates school. Moreover, he is highly physical and dominant. He is, in fact, a bad wolf. What are the life choices facing this young black wolf? Well, he’s already a dismal failure at school. The academic track is a dead end for him. He will definitely have a miserable life if he tries to go down the conventional path of achieving exam success. He has no chance at all of passing any exam. In order to have power and influence within his community, it’s vital for him to minimize the importance of education in his peer group because that is where he is at maximum disadvantage, where he’s an absolute, sure loser. So, he uses his physicality to bully all of the smart boys. He constantly rubbishes academic attainment and says it’s only for those “sell-outs” trying to copy whites. He says that all books are racist because they’re written by white men and promote white values. He plays “gangsta rap” constantly and is always talking about hoes, bitches, guns, bling, drugs, robbery and shooting cops. He and all of his friends refer to each other as “niggers”.

He can’t speak English very well since he can barely read, so he starts inventing a new language in which no one is more fluent than he is. This is a kind of grunting language full of words being used in bizarre ways (he never really understood what the words meant in the first place). Also, this coded language serves to stamp his brand on his gang and to exclude outsiders. He defies teachers in school and is regarded as a rebel, a “hero”. At all times, he says he’s too cool for school and that any academic kid is a geek, nerd, dork, and uncool loser. He relentlessly stigmatizes and bullies any academically successful kid. He is inevitably expelled (not that he attended school much anyway). He becomes involved with the local drug dealers and starts earning good money and driving a flash car. He gets sexy girlfriends. His friends envy him and look up to him. He beats up, stabs or shoots anyone who opposes him and rules his gang with an iron fist. He demands “respect” at all times.

So, this guy has created a good life for himself where he has status, power, respect, and money. He has maximized his opportunities outwith the school environment where he had zero chance of achieving anything. Can anyone criticize him? The academically talented kids leverage their academic skills to the maximum. Why shouldn’t those with different skills leverage those different skills to the maximum too?

Does our case study sound familiar? All people who struggle at school are tempted by the alternative, criminal type of life we have described. It’s no surprise that unsuccessful white kids should be attracted to this gangsta scene and its street code and language. Very soon, they will be black in all but skin colour. By the same token, the blacks who do well at school will soon be white except in skin tone. If blacks were the academically most successful then the positions would be reversed and ambitious whites would be seeking to become black, and unsuccessful blacks would be turning white. It’s not race that’s the issue: it’s which group is most identified with educational success in an environment where huge emphasis is placed on passing exams.

How should we deal with the young black wolf? The doctrine of negative liberty – of non-interference in people’s lives – says, “Do nothing.” But we know exactly where that leads – to increasing criminality and eventually jail or death.

The interventionist State would stop this young black wolf from poisoning his peer group and turning them against education. He, and everyone else of similar ilk, would be identified at an early age by psychological profiling and they would be taken to radically different, non-academic schools. Here, their particular skills would be identified and a means found to harness them constructively. The young wolf would feel proud and successful of his achievements. His self-esteem and self-image would be high. Far from becoming an enemy of the State, he would be transformed into a valuable contributor with a clear-cut, non-academic path to follow through life. He would enjoy status and power within the system rather than outside it.

Gang culture is a direct product of negative liberty where governments make no attempt to intervene in the lives of non-academic kids from dysfunctional families. Gangs are an alternative form of society. They have a hierarchy and a code of conduct. They have a dress code, a demand for “respect”, for loyalty. To “diss” one member of the gang is to diss the whole group. A gang provides status, a place, a function, a role in life, an identity, a cause. For those who have been rejected by the mainstream, why wouldn’t you join a gang?

In the arena of positive liberty, gangs are wholly unacceptable, and they would be prevented from arising in the first place. Gangs are formed by bad wolves, so the primary way to stop their formation is to deal with the bad wolves before they become bad. It’s not a remotely difficult job as long as the State assigns itself the right to address problems at the earliest possible stage. Any failure to tackle a problem makes the problem much worse. The advocates of negative liberty never intervene until the streets are on fire and rioters are roaming around like wild animals. Is that rational?

Gangs are the logical response to the indifference of the State. If the State doesn’t help then people will help themselves. They can’t be blamed for that. It’s the State’s fault for doing nothing. The British riots were exactly what the British form of government brought on itself by its criminal disregard for kids from ghettos.
__________

The Krypteia:

THE ANCIENT SPARTANS had an alternative way of dealing with troublemakers. They were faced with the problem of suppressing a slave population that outnumbered them some ten to one. They chose to wage psychological warfare and selective assassination against the helots (slaves) to keep them under control. Above all, they targeted any helots that showed any signs of dominant behaviour. If you kill all the wolves, only tame dogs are left, and they are no threat to anyone.

Plutarch gives the following account of the deadly Spartan tradition known as the Krypteia (“hidden, secret things”; the Krypteia might also be regarded as the Spartan secret service):

By this ordinance, the magistrates from time to time dispatched privately some of the ablest and most discreet of the young warriors into the country, armed only with their daggers, and such minimal supplies as were necessary. In the daytime, they hid themselves in out-of-the-way places, and there lay quiet, but, in the night, they came out into the highways and killed all the helots they came upon; sometimes they set upon them by day, as they were at work in the fields, and murdered them. As, also, Thucydides, in his history of the Peloponnesian war, tells us, that a good number of them, after being singled out for their bravery by the Spartans, garlanded, as enfranchised persons, and led about to all the temples in token of honours, shortly after disappeared all of a sudden, being about the number of two thousand; and no man either then or since could give an account how they came by their deaths. And Aristotle, in particular, adds that the ephori, so soon as they were entered into their office, used to declare war against them, that they might be massacred without a breach of religion. It is confessed, on all hands, that the Spartans dealt with them very hardly; for it was a common thing to force them to drink to excess, and to lead them in that condition into their public halls, that the children might see what a sight a drunken man is; they made them to dance low dances, and sing ridiculous songs, forbidding them expressly to meddle with any of a better kind. And, accordingly, when the Thebans made their invasion into Laconia, and took a great number of the Helots, they could by no means persuade them to sing the verses of Terpander, Alcman, or Spendon, “For,” said they, “the masters do not like it.” So that it was truly observed by one, that in Sparta he who was free was most so, and he that was a slave there, the greatest slave in the world. For my part, I am of opinion that these outrages and cruelties began to be exercised in Sparta at a later time, especially after the great earthquake, when the Helots made a general insurrection, and, joining with the Messenians, laid the country waste, and brought the greatest danger upon the city. For I cannot persuade myself to ascribe to Lycurgus so wicked and barbarous a course, judging of him from the gentleness of his disposition and justice upon all other occasions; to which the oracle also testified.

The Wikipedia entry gives the following account:

“Every autumn, according to Plutarch, the Spartan ephors would declare war on the helot population so that any Spartan citizen could kill a helot without fear of blood guilt. The kryptes were sent out into the countryside with only a knife to survive on their skills and cunning with the instructions to kill any helot they encountered at night and to take any food they needed.

“According to Cartledge, Krypteia members stalked the helot villages and surrounding countryside, spying on the servile population. Their mission was to root-out potential sedition. Troublesome helots could be summarily executed. Such brutal oppression of the helots permitted the Spartans to control the agrarian population and devote themselves to military practice. It may also have contributed to the Spartans’ reputation for stealth since a boy who got caught was punished by whipping. Only Spartans who had served in the Krypteia as young men could expect to achieve the highest ranks in Spartan society and army. It was felt that only those Spartans who showed the ability and willingness to kill for the state at a young age were worthy to join the leadership in later years.”

So, the Krypteia was like Special Forces training of the most extreme kind, involving assassination missions as a rite of passage. Others have described it in terms of a secret police like the Nazi Gestapo, designed to identify and deal with subversives at an early stage. One way or another, the wolves must be dealt with. The rational way is to do so early and benevolently, and to harness the wolves’ positive qualities for socially productive ends. The Spartan approach is also rational, but brutal and tyrannical. The irrational approach is to do nothing and let the problem fester and grow. Gang culture is exactly what you get when wolves are allowed to rule their own local environment. It’s monumental madness to allow this to happen.

Gangs are a disaster. They are a State within a State or, more accurately, a dysfunctional State within a dysfunctional State. The whole point of gangs is to challenge the authorities and to be, in effect, at constant war with the mainstream. Gangs are criminal entities, so why are they allowed to exist? It’s the appalling doctrine of negative liberty that allows the endless problems of the underclass to multiply until eventually they erupt on the streets, as happened in the UK.
_________

Scarface:

ONE OF THE MOST socially important films of all time is Scarface (1983) directed by Brian De Palma, written by Oliver Stone and starring Al Pacino as the grotesquely larger than life and unforgettable Tony Montana. Black gangs and even the Mafia have acknowledged their debt to Scarface. They all seek to emulate Montana and the lifestyle he enjoyed. Montana, a bad wolf if ever there was one, gives a voice to all of the aggressive young men outside the mainstream, particularly those who have little or no meaningful contact with the education system.

Montana says of himself, “Okay, here’s the story. I come from the gutter. I know that. I got no education… But that’s okay. I know the street, and I’m making all the right connections. With the right woman, there’s no stopping me. I could go right to the top.” Note the staggering ambition. It’s not good enough merely to do well despite having no education. Only “the top” will satisfy his ambition. Everyone these days is staggeringly ambitious. Every scumbag wants to get to the top and thinks they can realistically get there. Never have so many people been so deluded. Not one of these “top-seekers” ever expects to have to work themselves to exhaustion to get there. Hard work is never considered necessary. It’s all about “balls” and “being myself”.

Montana says, “Orders? You giving me orders? Amigo, the only thing in this world that gives orders is balls. You got that? Balls.” In other words, the law of the jungle applies. The strongest give orders. The rest must obey. Montana is throwing down the challenge that all wolves offer: fight or submit. “This is paradise, I’m tellin’ ya. This town is like a great big pussy just waitin’ to get fucked.”

In gang culture, everything is described in sexual terms. Homosexuality is unacceptable. A pussy is regarded as the ultimate goal. Heterosexuality is so extreme as to become, ironically, homoerotic (just look at the amount of time gangstas spend getting the look right, going to the gym and “bonding” with their “brothers” in sweaty, oily, masculine environments). “In this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the women.”

This is the basic equation all gang members understand.

In the famous restaurant scene, Montana says to the upmarket diners, “What you lookin’ at? You all a bunch of fuckin’ assholes. You know why? You don’t have the guts to be what you wanna be. You need people like me. You need people like me so you can point your fuckin’ fingers and say, ‘That’s the bad guy.’ So… what that make you? Good? You’re not good. You just know how to hide, how to lie. Me, I don’t have that problem. Me, I always tell the truth. Even when I lie. So say good night to the bad guy! Come on. The last time you gonna see a bad guy like this again, let me tell you. Come on. Make way for the bad guy. There’s a bad guy comin’ through! Better get outta his way!”

Gangsters and the rich have a great deal of moral equivalence. Most rich people are simply legalized gangsters; those who have the law on their side when they commit their robberies and hold ups. What better way to steal from a bank than to be its chief executive, empowered to award yourself enormous bonuses? Who needs to wear a mask to carry out a heist? Better to walk into the vault as the CEO and help yourself.

“I’m Tony Montana! You fuck with me, you fuckin’ with the best!”

All top gangsters think they’re the best, and indestructible. They never are.

“You wanna go to war?! We’ll take you to war, okay?!”

Gangs are about four things: money, power, sex and violence.

“Okay, Sosa. You wanna fuck with me? You fucking with the best! You wanna fuck with me? Okay. You little cockroaches… come on. You wanna play games? Okay, I’ll play with you. You wanna play rough? Okay! Say hello to my little friend!”

This is the monologue that runs through the head of all gangsters as they embark on insane rampages, usually culminating in their own death.

“Hey, how’d you like dat? Huh? You fuckin’ maricón! Hey! You think you can take me? You need a fuckin’ army if you’re gonna take me! You hear?! C’mon! I’ll take you all to fuckin’ Hell! Come on! Come on! Come to me! Okay! Who you think you fuckin’ with? I’m Tony Montana! You fuck with me, you fuckin’ with the best! [while being shot repeatedly] Come on! I’m still standin’, huh! Fuck! Come on! Go ahead! I take your fuckin’ bullet! Come on! I take your fuckin’ bullets! You think you kill me with bullets? I take your fuckin’ bullets! Go ahead!”

Not the speech of a philosopher! Socrates certainly didn’t say any of this as he sipped his hemlock.

Tony topples from a balcony into the fountain below and floats face-down in the water beneath a statue of the globe bearing, in gaudy red neon, the inscription “The World Is Yours.” All gangsters think this.

Tony Montana has captured the imaginations of the uneducated underclass to an astonishing degree. He was the man who climbed out of the gutter and reached the top through sheer force. How many thousands of gang members have met their deaths as they tried to imitate Tony Montana? The money, the beautiful women, the cocaine, the flash cars, the luxury mansions, the fear and respect of everyone – this is the package that the whole underclass dreams of. Education features nowhere in this fantasy. Reason has no role. It’s all about will. About BALLS. The educated must use their superior intellect to destroy this Scarface dream world that gang members permanently inhabit.

Scarface is a brilliant movie, but it should be interpreted as a warning rather than as something to aspire to. Society is fucked if it is generating enormous numbers of Tony Montanas on the one hand and Reality TV wannabes on the other. Any rational society must be all about EDUCATION, EDUCATION, EDUCATION. Where an academic education is inappropriate, other types of civilising and productive education must be provided, leading to good career prospects.
__________

Werewolves:

Why are people so fascinated with werewolves, with the transformation of an ordinary person into a human wolf at the full moon? It’s because tame, timid human “dogs” fantasize about what it would be like to be one of the dominant wolves for a change. But real human wolves are real human wolves all the time, not just on full moons. They are permanent werewolves, and it usually takes bullets – they needn’t be silver! – to stop them.
__________

Simplicity:

People imagine that they are complex but in fact you could know almost everything about them by spending five minutes walking through their house. Straight away, you would know who is rich and who is poor, who is messy and who is tidy, who has imagination and who is conventional. People with pets can be assumed to be feeling and sensing types. People with fast, flash cars, enormous TV screens and state of the art video games are heavily into sensation. Thinkers and intuitives will usually have plenty of books. Thinkers will have many conventional academic books while intuitives will also have esoteric books, science fiction and fantasy books.

People who read lots of literary fiction might be mistaken as thinkers or intuitives, but they’re not. Fans of literary fiction are just a special category of feeling and sensing types who get their thrills from imagining situations rather than actively experiencing them. Your clothes also betray a huge amount about you, as do the friends you have. The contents of your fridge, the type of wine you drink, your toiletries in the bathroom…absolutely everything throws light on who you are, how you think and how you behave.
__________

Planet Bling:

Astronomers think they have identified a planet made of diamond. Are all the bling kings having multiple orgasms? What next? – a solid gold planet – Planet Midas in the Mammon Quadrant? Instead of the Man on the Moon, we’ll have the Bling King on Planet Platinum Card. Did you know that gold is formed when a star goes supernova? Then it rains down on planets like ours – the ultimate golden shower! Can you imagine looking up and seeing gold dust suspended in the air, glinting and gleaming, making earth’s atmosphere take on a miraculous golden glow?
__________

The Wolf War:

“Everything good is the transmutation of something evil: every god has a devil for a father.” –Nietzsche

GNOSTICISM DECLARES ABRAHAMISM to be the religion of Satan. Gnosticism declares that the vast majority of humanity are deluded and indeed evil. Gnosticism declares that humanity is in thrall to the Devil and controlled by Satanic forces. The world, therefore, is a fundamentally evil place. It can even be defined as hell itself; or as a prison planet for ignorant, deluded and wicked souls. There are ways out, but only when humanity turns to reason, knowledge and logic (Logos) rather than faith, superstition, story, emotion and fable (Mythos).

Gnosticism promotes the agenda of the Enlightenment. Abrahamism promotes the agenda of primitive Middle Eastern tribes obsessed with slavish obedience to a Torture God. The Armageddon Conspiracy by Mike Hockney is a book about the revaluation of all values. It seeks to shock anyone from a Christian background into a 180-degree revolution of their worldview. What if Christians weren’t the “good guys” but the opposite? What if the “bad guys” – the Nazis and the notorious Illuminati – were the heroes of humanity fighting the good fight? In fact, what if the Nazis and the Illuminati were one and the same? This is one of the themes of the novel.

This raises the question of what, if any, are the true connections between the Nazis and the Illuminati. After Germany’s defeat in WWI, the nation descended into chaos. The Illuminati saw a glorious opportunity to bring about a German Revolution based on paganism, Gnosticism and a New Enlightenment. It’s true that three Gnostic secret societies, including the Illuminati, had connections with the milieu from which the Nazi Party emerged. The Illuminati knew several people who became prominent Nazis. The Grand Master of the Illuminati actually met Adolf Hitler in the early 1920s and found him interesting and impressive but clearly suffering from “Messiah Syndrome” – when a person becomes convinced that he personally (rather than as a part of a rational movement) has a divine mission to save his country or the world.

The Armageddon Conspiracy explores the notion of Hitler being recruited by the Illuminati and becoming its Grand Master. In fact, the Illuminati quickly grew to despise the Nazis, seeing them as nothing but moronic, racist thugs who were intending to replace the God of Abrahamism with a “new Jehovah” – the Fuehrer! Nazism was a celebration of the cult of the personality rather than a new, enlightened, anti-Abrahamist, anti-capitalist system of government that would lead forward the whole world. Nevertheless, the Illuminati were fascinated by the tactics and strategy invoked by Hitler. When Hitler came to power in 1933, Germany was beset by catastrophic economic difficulties and continual violent clashes between left and right wing parties. The liberal centre was paralysed and hopelessly ineffectual. Yet within an extremely short period, Germany was fully stable and prospering under Hitler’s rule, albeit that its main activity was rebuilding the German war machine.

Imagine that in a few years from now, America and the major European powers are bankrupt, capitalism is dead, democracy has collapsed and rival factions are violently struggling for power. Everything is in chaos. How will order be restored? Will liberals achieve it? Or does some spell have to be cast over the people, just as Hitler bewitched Germany? Hitler identified an internal enemy disliked by all Germans – the Jews. He also identified an external enemy – Bolshevism. His private army, the SA (later replaced by the SS), ensured instant law and order.

In Revolutionary France, the Illuminati were faced with enormous difficulties in transforming chaos into order and were forced to take savage measures. Liberals are of course horrified by the steps that Revolutionary groups take to impose their will, but they conveniently never consider the question of how they themselves would run a country if it were on the verge of total collapse. Bland, liberal, consensus politicians would be eaten alive. As Hitler rightly recognised, the Will becomes fundamental in chaotic situations. Those with the strongest will are those who triumph.

If the prevailing Western economic and political paradigm of “liberal” capitalist democracy were to collapse tomorrow and the Meritocracy Party stepped in, no one can be in any doubt that extreme measures would have to be taken to entrench the new system. All actions have to be decisive, and the most radical measures must be taken IMMEDIATELY. The Revolution will be won or lost in the first 100 days. By the end of that period, the shape of the future must be apparent to all, and irreversible. The days of the rich would instantly be over. All of their assets would be seized (as happened in the Russian Revolution). A brand new constitution would be declared setting out the philosophical principles of the new regime. All existing institutions inconsistent with the new constitution would be abolished.

Of course, since there won’t be any widespread rational agreement about what has to be done the new government must be backed up by force – a “New Model Army” (France had a Revolutionary army, Russia had the Red Army and Hitler had the SA and SS). A new police service must be ready to step in. There must be a secret police to identify counter-revolutionaries. Liberals are appalled by such ideas and talk of a “police state”. These people are naïve beyond belief. The world is never changed by holding enormous genteel tea parties for the liberal chattering classes. To undo thousands of years of brainwashing and to effect a decisive, irreversible change, there is simply no question that illiberal measures must be taken. If you don’t want to get your hands dirty then declare yourself one of the Ignavi and stand on the side-lines. Don’t get in the way! The will of the new regime must be absolute and unflinching. Robespierre and Saint-Just did not flinch. They WERE the French Revolution. Without them, the Revolution would have collapsed. Their iron will held the whole thing together.

The end of Abrahamism will not come about by negotiation and debate. It will come about because a superior will declares Abrahamism illegal and puts it out of business once and for all. In Germany, Hitler quickly made the Christian Churches subordinate to his will, and established Nazism as a form of pagan religion, a return to the pre-Christian age of German heroes. The German people soon adopted a new mindset based on doublethink – half Christian, half Nazi. This doublethink is often a precursor to a radical change. Moreover, the Hitler Youth were raised purely within the Nazi paradigm and experienced little or no Christian brainwashing, but endless Nazi indoctrination. Many of them were more loyal to Nazism than to their own parents, and were willing to expose their parents to the authorities as subversives if they overheard them criticizing the Fuehrer.

Although this sounds repellent, the question must be raised whether it’s any more moral for parents to brainwash their children. The ultimate aim is to create an environment where zero brainwashing takes place, but in order to get there, the brainwashing performed by parents must be undone.

“Faith” and superstition must be eradicated from the human condition, replaced by reason and knowledge. Worship of Torture Gods and Terror religions must be ended and replaced by psychologically healthy religions devoted to maximisation of human potential and the aspiration to turn humans into Gods. Worship of money must be eliminated. None of this will be accomplished by half-hearted, liberal talking shops. It will be enacted through irresistible force of will. Hippies, new agers, flower power people, the “love brigade”, the tree huggers and all the rest will never change anything. Change is a function of power, of force, of will. Unpleasant acts are a sine qua non.

Hitler stabilised Germany by neutralizing all dissenting voices, by silencing all the wolves who opposed him. Instantly, the chaos and street violence that had characterised the Germany of that era ceased. There was an immediate benefit for the vast majority (though not of course for the people who hated and opposed Hitler).

Had Hitler actually been the Grand Master of the Illuminati, committed to implementing the enlightened meritocracy of the Illuminati, he would have created the most powerful nation in human history that would have led the rest of the world into a Golden Age. Instead, he presented himself as an Aryan Messiah and plunged the world into a horrific war that, in the end, made superpowers of the capitalist, Zionist-financed Americans and the communist Russians – in other words, Hitler gave an unprecedented victory to the two opposing poles he hated most. Way to go.

Many people think they will fight when the shitstorm comes. But they won’t. Only the wolves come out to play. The rest cower in their homes and wait for the outcome to be decided. The world is all about the wolves and who controls the wolf pack. The set of wolves that moves most decisively always wins. The “Wolf War” is invariably conducted at the level of Scarface: brutal violence. Look at all the so-called “velvet revolutions” that have taken place throughout the world. Could it be said that any of them actually worked? Who, ultimately took over in all of these countries? – the rich, the friends of Zionism. Goldman Sachs moved in to direct their economic policies. Velvet revolutions turned out to be nothing but the replacement of socialist elites by capitalist elites. These were fake revolutions that were more like corporate takeovers.

Genuine revolutions generate violence because there’s so much at stake. Imagine an enlightened government seeking to bring an end to circumcision and Abrahamism. The Abrahamist wolves would definitely resort to violence. After all, the Abrahamists have been history’s most violent group. Religious fanaticism goes hand in hand with “holy war”. Yet our world cannot move on until Abrahamism is destroyed. Abrahamism is the dark, dead, evil past. There will never be a rational, enlightened New World Order while the poison of Abrahamism flows through the world’s arteries.
__________

The End of the Wolf Age:

“Liberal: a power worshipper without power.” –George Orwell

The wolves have dominated the world long enough. They are a product of an excess of testosterone, so the antidote is oestrogen. We need far more women in influential positions. Banking, stock markets and economic policy should, in particular, become the province of women. That is the surest way to end boom and bust cycles. Boom is the outcome of aggressive greed and risk-taking. Bust is when the gambles finally fail and, sooner or later, they always do. Money, of course, is power and it’s essential that power should not fall into the hands of the wolves.

It’s time for the wolves to be tamed, but we don’t want to turn them into dogs. Cats would be more appropriate!
__________

3/7