You can belive this or not
You can belive this or not.
The fact is that CONSPIRACIES have been and will be.
In DOHA they say:
Alsharq Today – الشرق اليوم
𝘼𝙧𝙚 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙖𝙡 𝙇𝙖𝙬𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙃𝙪𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝘽𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙏𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙚𝙙?
BY: Dr. Sulaiman Ahmad
This article presents a scenario that is proposed by many analysts, a scenario that close to a Hollywood movie, or perhaps a Bollywood one, though it is not necessarily the right one. Considering that the events that happened during the past 20 years could be part of an awful global scheme and with societies discovering the Internet, many theories, opinions, and hypotheses have emerged in an attempt to imagine the future. Many have gone far with their imaginations to the extent of hypothesizing who will live and who will die.
At first, many believed those were mere Sci-Fi scenarios or unrealistic symbolic stories at best. Yet, after digging deep into relevant theories and opinions published in 2004 and onwards, some started to believe that the possibility of a war against humanity is a debatable theory, open to all scenarios, with the aim to protect the most powerful and wealthiest classes around the world.
What the world is experiencing today due to Covid-19 may constitute a golden opportunity for those who wish to implement the international restructuring plan and to reduce world population by 25% so that the world regains its balance and vitality, as claimed by leaders of the “World Board”.
Based on the speeches of country leaders, and several analytical articles and previously programmed news reports, a number of researchers believe that the world is heading towards the worst scenario; given the nature of Coronavirus, which spreads horizontally affecting 60% -80%, a high death rate of 20% fulfills that purpose. It also achieves the plan set by the “World Board ”, according to which a large portion of the world population will be gone.
Some readings in this theory, which is adopted by its followers, note that the “World Board” believes that last century’s plan to control the demographic growth in this planet’s population in the 70s and the 80s has failed. Therefore, according to some analysts, it is logical to accept discussing the notion that: (Coronavirus is among a series of related events aimed to forcibly reduce world population).
Should this theory prove valid, a question emerges on the legitimacy of the need to reduce the world population and the adopted plan to achieve that.
It is clear that high population growth constitutes a huge burden on countries and drains its resources, jeopardizing industrial and economic advancement, especially that most countries suffer from many problems as a result of overpopulation:
The increase in demand for food and water resources – despite the increase in production-, the lack of development services, the increased burden on infrastructure, the increase in demand for energy resources and the inefficiency of distribution, the decrease in educational services, the increase in state debt, high inflation rates, and the rise in unemployment rates, difficulty of implementing development programs, high crime rates, air, water and land pollution, shrinking non-urban spaces, and increasing population rates threaten the future of life, and the sustainability of natural resources and areas that are being depleted, especially non-renewable sources such as: fuel and energy.
According to recent statistics, there are approximately 7.5 billion humans living on this planet, which are expected to reach 9.6 billion people by 2050 as per population estimates and statistics; this means we need another planet that can handle this increase, and it is up to you now to imagine the increased demand on natural resources. Such figures are a source of distress and concern for world theorists who have taken it upon themselves to plan the future of the world. From here, researchers were prompted to view Coronavirus from a different angle.
Most medical reports refer to the fact that COVID-19 does not affect children, without providing any explanation for this phenomenon; it is a virus targeting and killing only the sick and the elderly. This drives some to believe the idea that the behavior of this virus has a kind of programming and genetic engineering destined to perform this task, especially since major countries pursued a policy of “herd immunity” – secretly or publicly – in confronting the virus. Since there is no vaccine for the virus, only the strongest will survive; as the proportion of people aged 65 years and older makes up 9%, this means that the first stage of forced elimination targets the weakest groups on earth. This is the truth of the natural process, according to Darwin’s Theory of “Natural Selection” and Survival of the Fittest.
Since medical treatment for the sick and elderly is costing billions of dollars every year, without them participating in the production cycle, getting rid of them becomes acceptable for saving money for constructive and important projects.
Other readings circulating these days imply the “”World Board” plans to bring an end to homeless people and criminals; there are more than 10 million individuals in prisons around the world creating a low-ranked social classification. As a result, they are unworthy of reproduction and living, hence, according to these readings, there were considerations to integrate the Coronavirus vaccine with chemicals that affect fertility, meaning that these people will not be able to reproduce properly. This plan includes Eastern and Southern Europe countries and all countries constituting a so-called burden on humanity.
Many major countries may be aware of such a scheme, if any, and it has been implied that some categories controlling the world and its economy attempted in the 80s and 90s of last century to create a “New World Order” through transcontinental companies.
Some believe the U.S. was the first to push for this new order and tried to enforce it on countries, yet, did not achieve all its goals. This explains why it resorted to engineering and programming COVID-19, in a way that suffices and does not hold the state responsible before its people, per Chinese and Russian claims.
Besides, this scheme reinforces the U.S. power after claiming that other countries are competing with it.
Given the strict application of quarantine, and the resulting economic collapse of small and medium-sized companies, as it is being promoted by some entities and organizations around the world due to public lockdowns in the world, the post-Coronavirus economy will restore control to giants such as Amazon, which can cover the needs of the population in the U.S. and Europe by 60%, as well as “Alibaba” in Asia, along with giant IT companies that provide the technological infrastructure for the new digital world. This means that only five or six companies will be covering all the needs of the inhabitants of the earth.
If the majority of this theory’s supporter believe that this segment will control countries and their economies, how will this segment control the people?
There are some theories which suggest that China and most Asian countries strategically intended to control people through this virus via digital tracking and human behavior automation using cameras spread all over China which are capable of monitoring temperature degrees and human health conditions. In this context comes the mobile applications forced upon users, controlling who have the right to shopping and access public spaces like metro stations, in a manner communicating quarantine orders to people without human communication throughout the lockdown period.
If such theories were true, this experience, which is intended to include all countries around the world, is nothing but a digital detention covering and controlling the world. The result would be a massive database regarding the living style of every individual, which is a knowledge weapon for countries, allowing them to manage individuals as figures, rather than human beings.
With the spread of the virus and the global scare surrounding it, controlling the masses is no longer difficult, on the contrary, people have become obedient to a warning sent to them through a text message, or a written declaration, and we must accept that the world has overcome this complex.
In the post-Coronavirus era, practicing social control by countries would take place via a digital declaration of the government. By doing so, countries would determine their citizens’ behaviors, punishing methods, and social classification, as well as personal freedom and freedoms of belief and expression, may all be subject to the will of countries in the new world order. Similarly, key technology companies may contribute to the public’s compliance with this major societal adaptation.
In the same context, I have monitored Russian analytical platforms which believe that this scheme is in line with the elite world rulers, who are aware of the importance of removing the surplus population after the 2008 crisis. These countries have developed the plan and the vaccine for the Coronavirus, awaiting the right time to announce it; this vaccine is to be attached to a small chip produced by the “Intel” company, located in Israel, which would primarily allow the country to know the whereabouts of its carrier, health condition, body temperature, and blood pressure. With the spread of 5G technology, the chip holder will be in constant contact with a central network remotely directing humans.
Some Russian analysts believe that this plan is attended by about 1500 people, of whom approximately 300 are of global influence, 2000 people preparing the laws necessary to keep the plan running successfully, in addition to about 15,000 to 20,000 technicians, and other intelligence partners of major countries and international organizations.
As per this opinion, the plan should continue to work until 2024 where the first 18 months are the hardest in the transitional period due to Coronavirus rapid spread and its catastrophic results. The following 18 months will be used to develop a strategy to adapt, accept, and reshape the “collective mind” of the global community and its compatibility with the new world order.
The Russian perspective might be a bit of extreme, yet, it is possible that the world witnesses the deaths of millions, economic damage for the middle and poor classes, and confinement of societies in virtual and digital worlds, due to the novel Coronavirus.
Due to the exaggerated Coronavirus effect, the world population must become accustomed to the habitual acceptance of digital surveillance provided by artificial intelligence, in addition to controlling travel, public functions, and resources. Some claim this pandemic has enabled Europe, the U.S., and democratic countries to build such models under the pretext of saving millions of lives.
According to those who believe in the existence of this huge plan, implementing such a scheme requires following the principle of “you are either with us or against us”, in which countries are forced to join this new digital world order via economic blackmailing after suffering in fighting the Coronavirus. Humanity might then more fortunes, wars, conflicts, and famines in countries refusing to accept this change.
Lastly, this proposed theory might be entirely invalid; however, in case certain aspects of it were true at least, then we will be allowed to ask the following open question: Does this “World Board” plan intend to implement Darwin’s theory of natural selection and survival of the fittest, or those of Malthus and Lamarck who justified killing people in epidemics and wars when natural resources become scarce?
