FREE SOURCE and SOCIAL CAPITALISM (1)
FREE SOURCE and SOCIAL CAPITALISM (1)
Some time ago, I militated in the enlightenment circles for FREE SOURCE and was “punished”. Here is my final answer:
You see, a quarter of my life i’ve studied FOR FREE in an egalitarian system, the second quarter I was an anti communist creative engineer, the third I was an anti capitalist proletarian because my studies and background were not recognised in Italy were I arrived as political reffugee and now I am an illuminist peasant pensionaire. I’ve always thought that is urgent necessary and with ANY MODALITY the creation of a CRITICAL MASS of ALTRUISTIC INTELLECTUALS, for a major PARADIGM SHIFT.
It’s hard to belive that I’ll convince Brother Malus and the others to change their mind, but I’m sure that Pythagorean Illuminism is loosing a lot of potential sustainers if they act this way. Now we are next to EXTINCTION as species and I don’t see either a major interest of illuminists for SUSTAINABILITY and SOCIAL ARCHITECTURE. I’ve tried to fill this void with our think tank and after 11 years I am where I am. I say „I”, because on the way I’ve lost once, I’ve lost twice, I’ve lost even the other co-authors of our books. Maybe I’m not on the right path!? So, good luck guys, because I’m old and tired to fight the windmills. I have a lot to read, to listen to the birds, to watch the grass growing, to see the deer around in my mountains and so on. I will continue to pursue the activity of the illuminists as much as possible, because I know there is a lot of knowledge out there, but I, what I had to give, I gave.
I want to conclude by clarifying two issues related to communism and social capitalism from my current point of view.
I lived in communism and benefited from good quality education and health for free and at the same level for all. There was also a redistribution of resources in a theoretical ratio of 1: 6. It is true that the communist leaders had extra privileges, but far from the privileges of the capitalist elite. You know communism from the Media, but I lived it … and fought it on the ground. We had a strong state, without external debt, industrialized, with a performing agriculture, which means that we were much closer to the Illuminated Meritocracy than Capitalism is. There was virtually no Intellectual Property either; I created for example original technologies and even one invention, for which I received the dust from the drum, but my satisfaction was to see them working, not MATERIAL. Communism lost because the leaders betrayed, not because it was not competitive. Communism lost because it was sabotaged by the global financial elite. Now I realize that “it was better when it was worse”. This is why I do not like the term social capitalism and the 1:20 ratio. This is why I advocate for FREE SOURCE. The 1989 “Revolution” drew us back as a nation. All that was good was wiped out and an already dying system with catastrophic consequences was reintroduced. Of course, Materialist Ideology and Abuses existed, but they were far less dangerous than what we found in the “civilized world”. However, there were obstacles that could be removed much more easily than today’s obstacles.
Once again, good luck guys!
