Vă invit să vă alăturaţi grupului Facebook Mişcarea DACIA, ce-şi propune un alt fel de a face politică!Citiţi partea introductivă şi proiectul de Program, iar dacă vă place, veniţi cu noi !
O puteţi face clicând alături imaginea, sau acest link
Posts Tagged ‘Academia Iluministă’
Academia Iluministă (42)
Illumination:
llumination – the world’s most ancient and secret religion (also known as Illuminism).
The Illuminati – the secret society that preserves Illumination.
Illuminist/Illuminatist/
__________
Hegel:
The greatest trio of Grand Masters in the history of the Illuminati – three remarkable geniuses in a row – comprised Adam Weishaupt, Goethe and Hegel. Weishaupt, a German professor of civil and canon law, was also a philosopher of the Enlightenment and a radical revolutionary. Goethe was Germany’s greatest cultural figure and its foremost literary genius, and he was the man whom Nietzsche considered as coming closest to embodying his concept of the übermensch. As for the German philosopher Hegel, he is one of the most revered members in the history of the Illuminati and a towering figure in philosophy.
Hegel succeeded Weishaupt as Grand Master of the Illuminati in 1830, but died within a year. Goethe, then an old man, assumed the role, but more in an honorary capacity due to his frailty. He died within a matter of months.
The Illuminati look on this era as a particular Golden Age when it seemed that they might make a decisive breakthrough.
******
Johann Adam Weishaupt: February 6, 1748 – November 18, 1830
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: August 27, 1770 – November 14, 1831
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe: August 28, 1749 – March 22, 1832
******
Philosopher Richard Rorty said of Hegel, “Philosophers are doomed to find Hegel waiting patiently at the end of whatever road we travel.” Derrida said, “Hegelianism only extends its historical domination, finally unfolding its immense enveloping resources without obstacle.”
Hegel is a notoriously opaque philosopher, and is frequently misinterpreted, even by experts. Part of the reason he wrote in such an impenetrable style was that he was seeking to conceal his membership of the Illuminati and the fact that his philosophy is inspired by the religion of the Illuminati. Much of the detail of the Illuminati’s religion can be found in his works. However, to many ordinary people, Hegel’s writings are mystical, incomprehensible and unreadable.
One of Hegel’s most important contributions to philosophy was his “Master/Slave” dialectic. This was based on an ancient Illuminati philosophical account of the origins of the Old World Order – how it came about that a small group of people were allowed to dominate the world, and why the majority permitted this to happen. This question remains central to the Illuminati. Many people claim to find the Old World Order intolerable, yet they go right ahead and tolerate them. There would be no Old World Order if the majority did not cooperate with the machinations of the OWO.
For those who wish to discover more about the Master/Slave dialectic, a famous modern book is pertinent. Francis Fukuyama’s The End of History and the Last Man is strongly influenced by Hegel and provides an excellent account of how the world’s political systems have evolved. The section entitled “The Last Man” shows the pathetic type of person that is being generated under the rule of the OWO. (Fukuyama himself does not use such terms as OWO and indeed his book is admired by the OWO because he endorses many of their views. Even so, it is a worthwhile book for interested parties to study.)
__________
Master and Slave:
Most of us are slaves. No matter how much we loathe that conclusion and reject it, it is true nevertheless.
If you want to know if you are a slave, consider these criteria. Every day you go and do a job you don’t like. It gives you no creative thrill, and you derive no feeling of self-worth from it. You are under someone else’s control. Your employer decides how you spend your time, not you. Your employer demands obedience, application and proper conduct from you. If you don’t comply, you will be fired. You must behave in the way that the employer sees fit, not in the way that you deem fit. In other words, you have handed over your definition of “proper conduct” to another. You have sold your time and effort to your employer. Sure, you get a salary in return. You can pay the bills, buy nice things, support your nearest and dearest, go on holidays, go out for fine meals at the weekend. In short, you can live comfortably. It is on that basis – that your petty needs are satisfied – that you can justify the fact that you have given away your control over the most precious thing you have: your own life.
Your employer, on the other hand, is wealthy, loves what he does, gets immense status and prestige from it, is admired and envied. His lifestyle is breathtaking. He has three magnificent homes, a 300-ft yacht, a stable of Ferrari super cars. He stays in the best hotels, and everyone is eager to do his bidding and fulfil his every wish. They are permanently at his beck and call, falling over themselves to please him. He can come and go as he chooses. He will never be sitting in front of another person waiting to hear if he is about to lose his job. He is the one who decides who gets hired and who gets fired. He controls his life. He allocates his time as he sees fit. He behaves as he wishes to. He imposes his views on others. Others depend on him, but he does not depend on them.
So, then, which are you…master or slave? Who are the masters? The Old World Order. Who are the slaves? The rest of us.
Who is guilty? We are. Why? Because we allow the masters to rule us. In exchange for a “comfortable” living, we sign away our own lives. All over the globe, for billions of us, the headstones of our graves will bear exactly the same inscription: “Here lies the body of a person who was an adequate employee. He did what he was told and paid his taxes. He made no impact on the world. Nothing more need be said.” Are you happy for that to be your epitaph?
But on the marble headstones of the members of the Old World Order, overlooking vast, spectacular mausoleums, will be magnificent eulogies, great lists of achievements, the tales of the lives of people to whose tune so many danced.
Overwhelmingly, the masters are those born into privilege, those handed huge and overwhelming advantages from the outset. Their parents are wealthy. They live in the finest neighbourhoods. They go to the finest schools. They join Masonic societies with the other sons and daughters of privilege. They agree to carve up all of the best jobs amongst each other. They marry each other and breed new generations of masters. They don’t care about anyone else. Why should they? They have everything they want. On their side of the equation, there is no question to be answered.
The people who must answer the question are the slaves. The question could not be simpler. It is: why do we let the masters get away with it? And the answer is a painful one. It’s because we are lazy, apathetic, cowardly, satisfied with our trivial comforts. We’d rather accept the status quo than make any attempt to change things because then we’d need to leave our comfort zone, put in time and effort, and above all be brave and take bold risks. If we weren’t content with our enslavement, we’d be doing something about it. We’d be fighting back. But how many of us are doing anything at all? Don’t ask others what you need to do. Use your initiative.
The answer to why we behave this way was provided by Hegel, one of the greatest Illuminists of all. His dialectic of the master and slave is a famous and hugely influential contribution to philosophy. On its own, it would have elevated Hegel to the highest ranks of philosophers, yet it was just one small part of his dazzling thinking.
Only those slaves who understand Hegel’s remarkable dialectic will be able to change their status and become free men.
__________
The Freedom Fight:
Hegel’s treatment of the master and slave dialectic is highly complex and abstract, but we will attempt to communicate the gist of his argument in a way that non specialists can follow. The starting point is the concept of self-consciousness.
Self-consciousness is, by definition, a consciousness that is able to reflect upon itself. While all non-human animals on earth display various levels of consciousness, none of them are self-conscious. Hegel asserts that self-consciousness cannot exist on its own. It needs something else with which to contrast itself. To know what it is, self-consciousness must be aware of what it is not.
A self-consciousness needs otherness, but as soon it encounters otherness it also experiences, for the first time, fear. Otherness is foreign, a potential threat, something that stands in opposition. The self-consciousness wishes to exert its will to power over the other thing. It wants to possess it, discover its secrets, absorb it, subordinate it, but, crucially, not to destroy it. If the self-consciousness takes ownership of the other thing, it will no longer find it foreign, hostile and threatening. But if it destroys the other thing, the self-consciousness will no longer have anything with which to contrast itself and will start to unravel. It cannot exist without the presence of otherness, yet as soon as it takes possession of otherness, otherness is no longer truly other. How can self-consciousness overcome this dilemma? Hegel came up with a profound and dramatic answer – by otherness arriving in the shape of a second self-consciousness.
Self-consciousness, in order to become true self-consciousness, needs not just any external object – any otherness – but another self-consciousness. By observing this other self-consciousness, by learning what it does and how it behaves, the first self-consciousness starts to understand itself. It learns what it means to be a self-consciousness.
Imagine a human child growing up on a desert island without the presence of another human or even an animal. Would the child develop language, would it become self-conscious, would it even become human in any true sense? The harsh but unavoidable truth is that it wouldn’t. We become human by growing up amongst other humans, by being taught and guided by adult humans, by socialising with humans, by developing relationships, good and bad, with other humans. We immerse ourselves in the pool of humanity and thereby become human. If we are unable to do that because we have extreme autism, or severe Down’s Syndrome, or any other debilitating condition that makes proper social interaction impossible, then we will never be truly human but more like an animal.
Think of the God of Christianity, Islam and Judaism existing in complete isolation before he allegedly created the world. How would this God develop as a self-consciousness without anything or anyone else with which to contrast himself? To a Christian, Muslim or Jew that question is not only absurd but also blasphemous and heretical. But their conception of God is ridiculous and incredible beyond words. Their God is one that could never exist. They believe in a fantasy. No intelligent person could subscribe to their religious beliefs. If you are prepared to believe in a 15-yr-old virgin giving birth to the omnipotent, omniscient, perfect, timeless Son of God in a stable in the Middle East 2,000 years ago, you are prepared to believe in anything. You are far beyond the reach of rational debate.
Hegel was fascinated by what would happen when a self-consciousness first encountered a second self-consciousness. The first self-consciousness would certainly now have another object with which to contrast itself, but this would be no simple object that could be straightforwardly owned and negated as all the previous objects had been. In fact, this other self-consciousness might be a serious threat. Also, the first self-consciousness is plunged into an identity crisis. It is no longer unique. Not only that, perhaps, the first self-consciousness worries, the other self-consciousness might want to try to own and negate it as if the first consciousness were just another object.
Imagine two humans who have been raised in perfect isolation suddenly coming into contact with one another. What will they do? How will they behave? Hegel says that each requires recognition from the other: recognition that they are independent self-consciousnesses that are not mere objects to be owned and negated. What if the other refuses to provide that recognition?
If another self-consciousness does not acknowledge that I am also a self-consciousness, my whole identity is at stake. I am thrust into an existential crisis. Who am I? What am I? What will become of me? Does my existence have meaning?
When prisoners of war are being broken, one of the main tactics used is to dehumanise them, depersonalise them, refuse to acknowledge their humanity, their existence as anything other than objects. Many people have gone insane when subjected to this treatment. If you travelled the globe and were never once acknowledged as a human being by anyone you met, if you were ignored at every turn, if you were treated as invisible, you would soon no longer be human in any functioning sense. Quite simply, we cannot be human without acknowledgement of our humanity by other humans. Most people take their identity for granted, but it is astonishingly fragile, as many prisoners of war discover to their cost. The Jews in Nazi death camps were stripped of all of their humanity.
They were turned, metaphorically, and even literally in some cases, into objects. One survivor, the great writer Primo Levi once dared to ask a guard, “Why?” regarding some incident. The response he got was infinitely chilling: “Here, there is no ‘why’.”
Recognition is not just important, it is a matter of life and death. Our whole existence hinges on it. Without it, we are objects. We are not human. We might as well be dead.
Hegel says that in the first encounter between two self-consciousnesses, the outcome is so critical, so much is riding on it, that in effect it becomes a fight to the death. Yet death must not happen. If either is killed, the other is denied the possibility of recognition and loses the chance to be a proper self-consciousness. (Remember that Hegel says that a self-consciousness cannot exist in the absence of another self-consciousness. Self-consciousness is social and plural, never singular.)
So, while each person fights as if to the death, the struggle does not actually end in death because that would be the end for both self-consciousnesses, both the victor and vanquished. The only way for the situation to be resolved is for one self-consciousness to, finally, submit to the other i.e. for one to prove to be more cowardly and weak than the other, less able to put everything on the line in order to win, less willing to risk death itself.
So, both have survived and both can now acknowledge the other, but a terrible and infinitely fateful asymmetry has entered the equation. The struggle has ended with the complete victory of one over the other. The victor is the master and the vanquished his slave. The victor was prepared to fight to the death; the vanquished wasn’t. He gave up. The victor is courageous and the vanquished a coward. The victor is strong and the vanquished weak. The master controls and the slave is controlled. The master is the ruler and the slave is the ruled.
This struggle has, symbolically, been going on since the dawn of humanity. We have all participated in the struggle and we are now all either masters or slaves. It’s easy to know which. If you work for another person, you are a slave. If you can be fired, you are a slave. If others control your life, you are a slave. If you are fearful of what others might do, you are a slave. If you have to await the decisions of others, you are a slave. The freer and the more independent you are, the more you resemble a master.
Although it seems that everything is perfectly set up for the master, Hegel says that this is not the case. Certainly, the master can put the slave to work and live excellently off the slave’s hard toil. He can indulge in play all day long if he wishes. While the slave labours from dusk until dawn, the master lives a life of leisure and ease. Yet he is dissatisfied. He was hoping for acknowledgement from another self-consciousness, another person, but now he finds it hard to see the slave as anything other than an object. The asymmetry in their relationship means that there is no equality in the recognition for which they fought. The slave hates being viewed as a thing, and the master can barely tolerate being looked at by the slave.
But a new and amazing dialectic takes over. The master, living off the labour of the slaves, does no work himself. But the slave’s work, bit by bit, begins to change the environment. Fields are cultivated, buildings constructed, goods manufactured. In all of this work, something of the slave is turning into physical form. His consciousness is becoming externally objectified. He realises he has a mind of his own, that he’s capable of creation, and of ordering his environment. He becomes proud of his achievements. His self-assurance steadily builds. He no longer feels so wretched and worthless in comparison with the master.
When the slave and master survey the world, the slave sees the fruit of his own work, while the master sees the outcome of another’s work. The slave finds that his consciousness is appearing all around him in the shape of the work he has performed. He is finding a way to attain recognition and deeper understanding of his own consciousness other than solely through the approval of another self-consciousness. He grows as a person. He pours himself into his work. He learns things and becomes increasingly skilled. The master, on the other hand, is becoming lazy and inept, with none of his own work to show for his time.
As the dialectic unfolds, the slave, theoretically, should become more and more powerful and skilled until he is the equal of the master. At that point the master will no longer be able to treat him as anything other than a free man. Each side has achieved what it wants. The slave is no longer deemed less than human, and the master at last gets the recognition he craves from an equal. The master-slave dialectic has culminated in an outcome that preserves the two most valuable features of the dialectic: the master’s freedom, and the slave’s skilful work. Now the slave can enjoy the master’s freedom, and the master can acquire the skills of the slave.
At least, that’s what’s supposed to happen. But what if a group exists – the Old World Order – that wishes to ensure that the masters always remain on the top, and the slaves remain permanently less than human? Whether we are brave enough or not to acknowledge it, that’s the world we live in today. Police and soldiers are there to enforce the masters’ will.
Our way of life is inherently based on masters and slaves. We bow to assorted Gods, like slaves bowing to masters. We bow to monarchs and presidents, to the rich, to celebrities, to bosses and managers. We never tire of bowing to others and getting on our knees. We are controlled at every turn. Isn’t it time to unshackle ourselves, to stand up straight for once?
__________
Goethe:
Goethe’s Faust is a key Illuminati text.
“Goethe’s thinking is dominated by the idea of a society of elects or initiates perpetuating a sacred myth…The poem Geheimnisse (Secrets) haunts his spirit. The monastic order, whose mysteries are revealed in the fragments of the poem, shares in the order of the Templars, in Rosicrucianism, freemasonry and the mystic quest for the Holy Grail.” –Lepinte
“Goethe attained the supreme mysteries.” –Rudolf Steiner
__________
François de Nomé:
Several researchers have asked whether the mysterious French painter François de Nomé was a member of the Illuminati. The answer is yes. His paintings contain several coded references to the mysteries of the Illuminati. François de Nomé was also known as Monsù Desiderio/ Francesco Desiderio/ Didier Barra in order to confuse the enemies of the Illuminati. No one has ever come close to cracking the secrets contained in his paintings. Can you?
The paintings that deserve particular study are:
King Asa of Judah Destroying the Idols
The Tomb of Solomon
Martyrdom of a Saint
Belisarius Recognised by one of his Soldiers
Landscape with Roman Ruins
A View of Venice
A Fantastic Architectural View
Fantastic Ruins with St. Augustine and the Child
__________
Riesman:
David Riesman’s The Lonely Crowd was written in 1950, but it is becoming more true and relevant as the years go by. The Illuminati consider his definition of “other-directed” people to be an accurate reflection of the sort of people the OWO are hoping to create all across the world. Which would you consider yourself to be – “tradition-directed”, “inner-directed”, “other-directed” or “autonomous”? Read Riesman’s book and find out.
The Illuminati seek a world in which autonomous people flourish – those who are not puppets of ancient texts such as the Bible or the Koran, those who are not mouthpieces of their parents, or followers of whatever the current fashion is. Autonomous people think for themselves, avoid the brainwashing that others seek to impose on them, and would never tolerate the existence of the Old World Order. The OWO have created a human race of “last men”, of people in thrall to ancient traditions that were long ago shown to be false, of people who can’t make up their own minds but prefer to have them made up for them. They lack initiative and energy. They seek petty comforts and joys and are easily satisfied by junk food, junk jobs and junk entertainment.
__________
The Arthurian Cycle:
The Illuminati’s first explicit attempt to set down their belief system was by way of the Arthurian Cycle – the legends of King Arthur, the Knights of the Round Table, Camelot and the Holy Grail. All of the main themes of the Illuminati’s religion can be found here, although they are often heavily coded and perhaps as impenetrable to lay people as Hegel’s philosophy.
__________
Jung:
Carl Jung, the famous psychologist, wished to join the Illuminati. He was highly regarded but not deemed suitable on the grounds that he was a maverick and could not be trusted to follow the discipline required of all members. Nevertheless, the Illuminati worked closely with Jung because of the brilliance of his mind. Many of Jung’s ideas reflect the Illuminati’s influence, particularly what he has to say regarding alchemy and Gnosticism.
(Jung’s work on the personality inspired the Myers-Briggs personality classifications. The Illuminati devote considerable time to this subject. The vast majority of members of the Illuminati belong to a small number of Myers-Briggs types. Equally, the members of the OWO have a well-defined set of Myers-Briggs personality types. Do you know what your own Myers-Briggs type is?)
__________
Walker:
Gnosticism – Its History And Influence by Benjamin Walker provides one of the better introductions to Gnostic thought, though it does not touch on the unique Gnosticism of the Illuminati.
__________
Amfortas, the Grail King = the Grand Master of the Illuminati
The Grail Knights = the Illuminati
Montsalvache, the Grail Castle = Illuminati Headquarters
The Grail Hallows = the Holy Relics of the Illuminati
The Holy Grail = the Illuminati’s Most Sacred Object
The Spear of Destiny = the Holy Weapon for Killing “God”
The Waste Land = the World
The Wound That Never Heals = the Fractured Human Psyche
The Fisher King = He Who Catches Souls
The Round Table = Meritocracy
Galahad = The Finder of the Grail, The Saint
Parsifal = The Hero; he who embarks on the Road of Trials
Klingsor = the Magician, the Enemy, Lord of the Dark Arts (the God of Abrahamism)
Kundry (First Sorceress, First She-Devil, Hell’s Rose) = Temptation
The Flower-Maidens = Seduction (leading us away from the True Path)
The Siege Perilous = the Traitor’s Seat, for those who betray the Illuminati; the seat that’s deadly to all who are Unworthy
Simon Magus = the Divine Simon who gave the Illuminati the most precious object in the world: the Holy Grail itself
The Soul Camera = the Camera that takes a picture of the human soul. What is the connection between it and the Grail? No one who fails the Soul Camera test can ever be admitted to the presence of the Grail
******
Interested in the Illuminati? Study the coded Arthurian Romances. Go and see Wagner’s Parsifal. Study the Pied Piper of Hamelin. Go and see Goethe’s Faust. Study Dante’s Divine Comedy. Go and see Tarkovsky’s Stalker. Embrace the Light. Walk the Path of Truth, the hardest path of all, the path that all Questers of Enlightenment must take.
-AC
__________
9/14
Tags: Academia Iluministă
Academia Iluministă (41)
HyperHumanity:
The Illuminati aspire towards a future condition known as “HyperHumanity”, populated by HyperHumans (abbreviated as HHs or H2s). The underlying notion is that as human beings manifest more and more of their inner divinity – as they evolve towards gods – there will be an inevitable, radical and irreversible transformation in human society. HyperHumans will view current humanity as we view cavemen.
The HyperHuman is a being of supreme creativity, intelligence and spirit. H2s turn their backs forever on the trivia that consumes contemporary humanity. More and more, today’s world resembles a global shopping mall. Is that the purpose of life – to shop? Is “retail therapy” the height of human aspiration? Did we evolve from the primordial slime for no other reason than to buy “stuff”?
Walk through the main street of any town or city and you will see a shrine to consumerism. So, who can deny that contemporary culture has defined the meaning of life as shopping? If it had defined it as human excellence, main streets would look entirely different. But excellence requires effort on the part of people. Shopping requires only money. Shopping has become so successful because it follows the path of least resistance. You shuffle around from shop to shop like the undead; you exercise your precious “freedom and choice” by going to this shop rather than that shop, by buying this object rather than that one. You fetishise the objects you buy. They are your brand. Your identity is invested in them. If you have purchased “well”, you feel happy. You use your iPhone to tell your friends about your new objects. You go on Facebook to post pictures of your objects and to chat about them.
If you define yourselves by objects then you yourself become an object. If your mentality is attuned to buying then you yourself can be bought.
In the Sex and the City movie, the protagonists enter a gargantuan walk-in wardrobe, and practically faint. It’s as though they have entered the sanctum sanctorum, the holy of holies, and with their weary, mortal eyes beheld God in all his glory. Women in the cinema audience whoop, shriek and weep tears of joy and envy. They are on the point of multiple orgasm.
Wardrobes have become tabernacles. Shopping malls are our new cathedrals. Money is the Holy Spirit. Sales assistants are priests. Tannoy announcements are the voice of the Oracle. Objects are the sacred host containing the flesh and blood of God.
Life = Shopping. Is that the divine equation? Is that the great secret of human existence? Is that why the gods breathed life into the ancient clay? Is that why Prometheus stole the sacred fire? All so that we could push around shopping trolleys and have coffee at Starbucks? Have we all gone insane?
What kind of humanity is this? This can’t be the real thing. These “humans” are simulacra. The real humanity is somewhere else. Isn’t it time to find our missing selves?
This series of books moves forward on several tracks: religion, philosophy, culture, science and mathematics, history and psychology. We make no apologies for that. There is a concept known as “Renaissance Man”, exemplified most particularly by Leonardo da Vinci. Renaissance Man is skilled at everything, interested in everything, buzzing with energy and creativity in all fields. His mind is exploding with ideas. He crackles with potential and possibility. He is practically electric. If you touched him you would receive a shock. He almost glows. Now imagine Renaissance Man magnified a thousandfold. That is what a HyperHuman will be like.
We want to attract the attention and support of the Renaissance Men and Women of today. We don’t want any shoppers. People write to us to say our articles on religions and politics bore them. Why don’t we stick to esoteric matters, they say, or philosophy and science? Why don’t we “focus” our message? They thus prove that they are not our kind of people. We don’t need or want such people. They can be of no use to our agenda.
Humanity cannot be transformed in any meaningful way on a laborious person-by-person basis. To transform humanity, society itself must be transformed. To transform society requires political transformation.
Political, social and psychological thinking has always been critical to the Illuminati. Any group that seeks to bring about meaningful change must have a sophisticated and integrated understanding of humanity. As for the human spirit, it must be cultivated to its maximum, and that can only happen in a religious context.
Meritocracy is our political platform. Illumination is our religious platform. The “cosmic equation” r >= 0 is our scientific and philosophical platform.
Science, when it finally embraces the r >= 0 paradigm, will undergo a new Copernican revolution. r >= 0 reveals the link between the physical cosmos and the mental cosmos, the dimensional and dimensionless.
The equation indicates that there are two linked realms of “r = 0” (the mental universe, outside space and time) and “r > 0” (the physical universe, inside space and time) which exist as separate but interacting domains within the continuum of r >= 0. “r” refers to the distance between two points (both of which can be within an entity or each point can belong to a separate entity) and r >= 0 indicates that this distance can be reduced all the way down to zero. In relation to Cartesian philosophy, r > 0 implies a domain of extension i.e. matter, a physical world of individuated things in space and time, separated by real distances, while r = 0 implies a domain of non-extension i.e mind, a mental world of interconnectivity, outside physical space and time, where entities are not separated by any distance and nothing has any physical size. A black hole singularity and the Big Bang singularity are examples of situations in which the distances between all entities contained within them are reduced to zero. Nothing in these singularities has any extension and therefore, according to Descartes’ definition, they have entered the realm of mind. Scientific materialism denies the existence of the r = 0 domain, and is trying to find a way to make sense of black holes and the Big Bang that avoids dimensionless singularities. (The cosmic equation is explained in much more detail in others books in this series.)
Thanks to the cosmic equation, philosophy, religion and science come together in a coherent, integrated whole. There is no place for faith, common sense, or the deceptive evidence of our five senses. Our senses are directed at utility – what is useful to us in our everyday existence – not at truth.
We are advocates of a New World Order. We endorse a New Psychology – we want psychology to be at the heart of education, society, economics and the family. We advocate new community based ways of living. The “nuclear family” in its little, square, antisocial, box-houses is only one way of living. It should never have been allowed to become the fundamental, de facto building block of society. People deserve a choice. Family is fine for some people; others require community i.e. to live in supportive groups with people with whom they have no family ties. Failed families are a catastrophe for all concerned, and who picks up the pieces if there is no alternative to the family model?
We particularly advocate that people should have the opportunity to live in calibrated communities of people of similar psychological type – people who are on your wavelength and with whom you are likely to become lifelong friends and allies.
People need effective support networks. For many people, family has failed to provide such networks, so they live in various states of isolation, fragmentation and alienation. When the family “grid” fails you, you have a real problem in a family-based society. Single-parent families struggle in a society based on two-parent families. People who move around a lot may lose touch with their old networks and find it difficult to establish new ones. Highly intelligent and creative people may struggle to find like-minded people in a dumbed-down culture. Radicals may struggle to find other radicals. The exceptional can’t fit into a mould suitable for the average. Nietzsche wanted to live in a small commune of geniuses, but society does not provide communes for the extraordinary. All of these problems can be avoided with a modicum of thought and a move away from a society based on the monolithic model of the family. The family is a one-size-fits-all concept, but the world is much more complex than that. For some, the family is the greatest thing imaginable, for others it has proved a curse. Shouldn’t a sensible society provide alternatives?
Having good friends around you, people you understand and trust, is vital to your personal well-being and a well-functioning society. Psychological profiling can match you up with friends for life, and also allow you to understand why you are not on the same wavelength as various others with whom you come into contact. Many conflicts are caused by nothing more than misunderstandings based on how people of different psychological types view the same data. Thinkers, sensers, intuitives and feelers all have a different way of “seeing” the data. Often, they can’t comprehend how someone could possibly have viewed a shared event so completely differently. We all lack empathy and sympathy with those who are psychologically different from us. It’s no one’s fault. No one is more “right” than any other. But we need to find a way to get round the problem because it is a huge one. Psychology offers the answer. Psychology needs to become embedded in every aspect of life, especially in the workplace and in politics.
The Old World Order are strong supporters of isolated family units that operate according to ruthless self-interest, that are in fierce competition with each other over scarce resources such as the best schools, houses and jobs. Divide and rule. It’s easy to control families, much harder to control communities. The OWO have no interest is using psychology to improve society, just to manipulate it.
We seek transformation on all fronts. We seek a revaluation of all values, to borrow Nietzsche’s immortal phrase. Family values, religious values, social values, educational values and political values all need to be revalued.
At the heart of all of the different strands of our movement is a single, unifying idea – the dialectic. We wish to place the dialectic at the centre of human existence. Everything should be ceaselessly evolving onwards and upwards, guided by the dialectic.
The dialectic harnesses the triad of thesis, antithesis and synthesis in a systematic, scientific manner based on evidence and reason. Psychologically, the dialectic is a tool for exploring the shadow, and resolving all of the issues that hold us back from becoming our higher selves. We become better, superior, higher, by resolving the contradictions that surround us and inhabit us – the resistances, the hurdles, the setbacks, the roadblocks, the objections, the inner demons, the puzzles, the riddles of our lives. Every institution, every organization, every business, every activity, every endeavour, and, most of all, every person, should experience continuous dialectical improvement.
In a practical sense, the dialectic involves embedding “Devil’s Advocates” throughout society. Historically, the Devil’s Advocate was a learned person appointed by the Catholic Church to oppose a proposition to make someone a saint. He had to build a case for why sainthood should not be conferred. To overcome his strenuous counter-arguments, evidence for sainthood had to be extremely persuasive. Only the strongest candidates would survive the scrutiny of the Devil’s Advocate. Now the term is applied to anyone who opposes an argument in order to expose any flaws it may contain. The better the Devil’s Advocate (the antithesis), the better the thesis has to be to defeat it. An American air force saying proclaims, “It takes a great enemy to make a great airplane.”
Every institution that produces a “thesis” (which could be anything: a song, a shoe, a law, a service, a meal, a method of banking, a psychological innovation…whatever) should be matched with a Devil’s Advocate institution that seeks to find faults with it, and to suggest refinements, improvements or completely new ideas. These should, in turn, be matched with a third set of institutions known by the term of Tertium Quid (Latin for “third something”). These correspond to the synthesis phase of the dialectic. Their function is to look at what has been produced by the thesis and the antithesis phases and to create a third thing, a better thing, a higher thing (the synthesis), from the two inputs, which then becomes the new thesis (as a prototype). This is then returned to the thesis phase, where the prototype is refined and resubmitted to the antithesis phase, and so on, until the original thesis has arrived at its omega point of completion. In this way, everything can be scientifically, systematically, and continuously improved.
The Illuminati are organized along these lines. Those who are involved with the thesis are called “Visionaries” (since they have the original creative vision), those with the antithesis phase as the Devil’s Advocates, and those with the synthesis phase as Synthesizers (alternatively as Harmonisers).
The Visionaries tend to be INTJ types (“masterminds”), the Devil’s Advocates (“scientists”) INTP, and the Synthesizers are feeling and sensing types, both introvert and extravert. The 3-person cell that is responsible for this site comprises one INTJ, one INTP and one INFJ. This series of books is by no means dialectically perfect, but if it were refined and improved several times over, it would be as perfect as we could make it. The more complex something is, the more iterations it requires, and the more people should be involved. But, in principle, everything in the world can be handled in exactly the same way – medicine, education, politics, government, law, banking, economics, sport, entertainment, science, anything at all.
Isn’t it time for a Scientific Society? – for the world to have the scientific method and dialectic at its heart, guiding everything it does, purposely helping it to evolve towards perfection? Can any democrat honestly answer what the objective of democracy is? Where is it leading us? No country on earth has ever stated its objective. Well, we have no hesitation in stating ours. The purpose of our society is to create a community of gods. We aim to perfect every aspect of human existence through scientific, philosophical and psychological means. The scientific method, the Evolutionary Principle, and the psychological principle of maximum self actualisation, are the mechanisms to drive us to perfection. These are all elements of the dialectic.
What does democracy offer? Greater consumer choice. Big deal. How can that satisfy the greatest aspirations of the human race? That’s why democracy is destined to be superseded.
Democracy – so-called “people power” – reaches its end when people are given a vote and shops. What kind of objective is that? Is that it? Is that all? Is that the great vision of “freedom and democracy” for which people gave their lives? Get real.
We want to replace the global shopping mall with a global paradigm for pursuing ever-higher levels of human excellence. The “scientific method” is almost synonymous with the dialectic. Hypotheses are proposed and then tested in the real world. If they fail hopelessly, they are discarded. If they are reasonably successful, they are refined and improved then tested again. Eventually, after many iterations, they will reach their omega point of perfection where they are in complete accord with all experimental data and it is impossible to refine and improve them any further. Politics, religion, psychology, the family, institutions, companies, products, and individuals – they can all be radically improved.
Why assume that religions such as Christianity, Islam and Judaism are the last word in religion? Clearly they’re not since they have all been a dismal failure. But no Christian, Muslim or Jew will ever accept that everything they believe should be tested and, if necessary, rejected. They regard their holy books as infallible, eternal, unchallengeable and perfect, as the unchanging Word of God. Hence religious extremism, fanaticism and hatred of anyone who disagrees with them is built into these Satanic religions. Holy wars are the inevitable consequence of Holy books. That’s why Satan authored them. What better way to create conflict and division?
Democracy believes it is in no need of reform. Constitutions are never updated. Parliaments are never changed in the institutional sense. Why not? Is the 21st century the same as the 18th? Then surely there should be a new constitution to reflect new times? It makes no difference if you change the personnel in Congress and the White House because all politicians are a reflection of the prevailing “system”. If you want real change, you don’t put a different guy in the White House, you replace the White House and Congress with new institutions i.e. you change the system.
Is capitalism perfect? Are corporations perfect? Are consumer products perfect? Are services perfect? Are families perfect? Are individuals perfect? If not then where are the explicit dialectical mechanisms to ensure that our society is always getting better? Are institutions in the business of hiring extremely critical people who want to highlight all of the flaws that need to be addressed, or do they just want cheerleaders and yes-men who never argue, never complain and never challenge the powers-that-be. Rebels, whistleblowers, revolutionaries and radicals are all vital for the dialectic and should all be embraced rather than rejected.
In ultra-capitalism, everything is left to the mystical “market” – almost a religious concept – to sort out. But a market is not a designed, intelligent, purposeful, teleological process, transparent to all. Instead, a market is a shady entity, massively susceptible to corruption and manipulation by cartels, and to “insider knowledge”. The Old World Order love markets because they know how to control them for their own selfish purposes, except when the market suddenly falls apart because of unresolved contradictions that have been allowed to build, and boom dramatically turns to bust. The intelligent dialectic can and must replace the dumb market.
The whole world should be an arena dedicated to putting forward “theses” of suggested improvements, “antitheses” to oppose and test the theses, and syntheses to take forward the best of the theses and the antitheses, thus creating new higher theses, from which we can begin all over again, rising higher each time round, until, at last, we can go no higher.
Is that not our real purpose – to go as high as we can, to conquer the highest peaks, to stand with the gods on the summit of Olympus, breathing the rarefied air of divinity? Do you achieve that in a shopping mall?
We are advocates of continual progress, change and evolution. All of us are works-in-progress. We are all unfinished. There should be no sacrosanct ideas beyond challenge, no taboos that cannot be broken, no commandments set in unbreakable stone, no holy texts with changeless words written in fire. Dogmatism is all about establishing laws that are never allowed to be called into question. We reject all dogmas. There are no sacred cows. Everything must justify itself dialectically or be swept aside as irrelevant.
What are the alternatives? To be a Muslim suicide bomber on a martyrdom operation? To be a zombie capitalist consumerist listening to muzak and giving money to the “Man” – the greedy, selfish capitalist super billionaire? To be a Jew permanently waiting for the Messiah who never comes? To be a Christian waiting to be “Raptured”? To be stuck on Facebook forever, posting pictures of yourself that get older and older, sadder and sadder, reflecting your increasingly wasted life? To watch reality TV wannabes for the rest of your life? To worship sporting stars from your armchair until Doomsday? Is this all that humanity is capable of?
Control is all about inflexible rules. You MUST obey. In a dialectical society, there are no such rules, so control is transferred from the rules to the people, as it should be. When it comes to rules, cui bono? Always those who set the rules; never those who are subjected to them.
The dialectic smashes all of the old systems of control. It smashes the power of the established elites that live by the old rules. The dialectic permits the intelligent revaluation of all values. It analyses every institution on earth, and provides a mechanism for bringing it to evolutionary, dialectical perfection.
Pho’, the visionary Phocilitator, quotes an unknown author who said, “If you’re not giving the world the best you have, what world are you saving it for?” That’s what it’s all about – everyone giving their best and becoming the best they can possibly be. All the institutions of the world should be geared up for that purpose – maximizing human potential, actualising all of our greatest possibilities.
Capitalism, the dismal, sterile, idiotic, spiritually dead, imagination-free, prevailing ideology of the Western World sets as its highest goal the consumption of junk in order to enrich the elite who control the manufacture of the junk. The OWO have no interest in maximizing your potential, only their own. Capitalism is happy to take the worst from you providing it makes someone a fast buck. Capitalism is about driving people towards imperfection, where they are totally dependent on consumer items to give them fake confidence – the “beauty” industry being the most insidious example. It is really the “ugly” industry, its purpose being to make everyone feel inadequate.
We can’t let them hold us back any longer. It’s time to sweep them aside. We are a new, superior thesis; a higher stage of evolution. Our sights are set on the stars and the furthest celestial planes, not on shopping malls. We want to hear the Music of the Spheres, not the muzak of the mall.
The OWO preach the gospel of self-interest. We preach the gospel of enlightened self-interest i.e. the best possible world is not one where you are a king with unlimited power and the rest of humanity are on their faces in front of you as subjects barely recognizable as human beings (the OWO “vision”), but one where everyone is a god, everyone is performing at their optimal level, at their very best, and, collectively, they are producing paradise on earth. It’s impossible for a handful of people to build Golgonooza, the wondrous City of Imagination. It needs everyone, bringing their own unique gifts. All of us are improved by the quality of the people with whom we interact. If they are people of excellence then we will be too. If they are scum, they will drag us down into the sewers with them. So we have to use our intelligence, imagination and psychology to raise people up, not to cast them down.
Their fate is my fate. My quality is defined by their quality. Therefore it is in my interest to help them as much as I can, and to ask them to help me as much as they can. Together, we rise. Apart, we fall. The OWO’s agenda is to make us all fall, while they remain insulated in their high tower of privilege. How much longer will we tolerate being their slaves?
Where are the people’s champions, the great tribunes like the heroic Gracchus brothers of Rome? Where are the brave Knights of the Round Table determined to bring down the OWO’s pyramid? They are out there. It’s time to fulfil their calling, their destiny. The dialectic seeks out those imbued with the spirit of the age.
__________
Angels and Demons:
Does Dan Brown’s book and movie Angels and Demons present an accurate portrayal of the Illuminati? No. Does it contain grains of truth? Yes. Several people mentioned by Brown in his novel were Illuminati members. The Illuminati have always been favourably disposed to science. And the Catholic Church was, historically, the greatest enemy of the Illuminati. But times have changed. The Catholic Church is dead. It just hasn’t realised it yet.
__________
The Catholic Church:
The Pope, the head of the Catholic Church, styles himself as the “Vicar of Christ”, Christ’s earthly representative. He is, according to the laws of his Church, capable of making ex cathedra infallible statements. The Catholic Church asserts that it preaches eternal truths. Yet consider its violent and bloody history. It launched a “holy” crusade against the Cathars – a religion founded by the Illuminati – and all but exterminated it. The notorious Inquisition was first established with the Cathars in mind, and then extended to all “heretics”.
The Catholic Church launched several crusades against Jews and Muslims in the “Holy Land”. In the First Crusade, they captured Jerusalem and massacred virtually the entire population: Jews, Muslims and even Eastern Christians. Crusaders were offered “plenary indulgences” – unlimited forgiveness – for any killing they did in the name of their “holy” cause. Any crimes they committed would be forgiven, and so they went on one of the greatest criminal rampages in history. And all in the name of “God”.
For several centuries, the Catholic Church tortured and burned tens of thousands of witches and heretics, again all in the name of “God”, all in the name of Christ who supposedly preached loving your enemies, forgiveness, peace and turning the other cheek.
The official position of the Catholic Church is Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus – “Outside the Church there is no salvation.” All non-Catholics are damned. All Jews, all Muslims, all Hindus, Buddhists, Protestants, Atheists, Agnostics, Sikhs, etc. The Catholic Church reaffirmed its position at the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965): “Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.”
However, statements were also made at the Council that seemed to completely contradict this position by claiming that non-Catholic Christians might have a valid path to salvation. Some Catholics regarded these statements as heretical, and refused to acknowledge the conclusions of the Second Vatican Council, and nor did these traditional Catholics acknowledge the legitimacy of the succession of Popes since the Second Vatican Council. Their case is valid. Clearly, Protestants are aware of the Catholic Church and have refused to enter it, so how can they be anything other than damned in terms of Catholic theology? Otherwise, what would be the point of being Catholic rather than Protestant? And why did the Catholic Church burn many Protestants as heretics in past ages if the Protestants had a valid path to salvation? It makes no sense at all.
The Catholic Church, in order to be politically correct, has become a muddled joke, making incoherent, illogical and contradictory statements because it does not wish to appear illiberal. It no longer stands for anything at all.
Yes, the Illuminati despised the Catholic Church. But look at the Catholic Church now. Old, enfeebled, powerless. It has apologised for the excesses of the Crusades, but it has not, and cannot, disown them. If it did, it would be admitting that the Catholic Church made mistakes, that the Pope was fallible, that the truths of the Middle Ages are not the truths of now i.e. truth is relative and not absolute.
Similarly, Jews condemn the Papacy for not doing enough to save Jews during the Holocaust. Yet why should the Papacy, which in the past launched Crusades against the Jews, which believes that all Jews are going to hell for rejecting Christ, utter a single breath of apology? How can you apologise to a race that you believe is damned to hell? How can you shake hands with Muslims when you think they are all hell bound? How can the Pope have tea with non-Catholic kings, queens, presidents, prime ministers, and leaders of other religions? All of it is grotesque hypocrisy.
The Catholic Church is now just an essentially harmless, politically correct PR machine, terrified of telling its “truths” for fear of offending others. It has “spin doctors”, marketing departments, public relations experts – like a Wall Street corporation. The Illuminati stopped fearing the Catholic Church long ago. It has nothing left to say, no threats left to deliver. Stalin asked how many divisions the Pope has. He has none.
Angels and Demons is absurd. The Illuminati are fighting the Old World Order of the rich and powerful, and the puppetmasters standing in the shadows who long ago realised that the Catholic Church had nothing left to offer. Within the logic of its own theology, the Catholic Church has become heretical since the Second Vatican Council, and its Popes are now anti-Popes from whom only lies flow.
Forget the Catholic Church. In a few hundred years, or even sooner, it will be as relevant as the religions of the ancient Greeks and Romans.
__________
8/14
Tags: Academia Iluministă
Academia Iluministă (40)
Adam Weishaupt:
How did it come about that a revolutionary movement committed to the overthrow of corrupt European monarchies and privileged elites became, via the propaganda of its enemies, the very embodiment of everything it opposed? The Illuminati, through several historical epochs, have striven to overthrow the super rich and super powerful, and they have suffered savage persecution as a consequence. So how can they be confused with the puppetmasters who stand behind these tyrants of privilege and power? It’s absurd. Any person who knows anything of the history of the Illuminati should be able to see that their aims are incompatible with the aims commonly attributed to them by many anti-NWO conspiracy theorists.
Below we provide a Q&A list to address many of them myths surrounding the Illuminati’s most notorious Grand Master – Adam Weishaupt, and the Illuminati in general.
Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati.
Q. Did Adam Weishaupt (AW) found the Illuminati?
A. No, the Illuminati is a much older organisation. It has existed for millennia.
Q. Was AW a Grand Master of the Illuminati?
A. Yes. He was based in Bavaria in Germany. Since he was the first Grand Master to bring the Illuminati into public awareness, he sometimes pretended that the Illuminati was a new secret society, created by him. He was thus able to avoid questions about the long history of the Illuminati, which might have revealed important clues that would have assisted the Illuminati’s enemies.
The Illuminati have still not provided a precise history, and reserve this information for senior initiates. (It has erroneously been claimed that AW said that the last King of Persia founded the Illuminati, and then wrote a letter to a fellow member of the Illuminati in which he admitted this was an “innocent lie”. AW made no such claim and wrote no such letter, and such assertions are manifestly absurd. Why would a republican organisation opposed to monarchy claim a Persian monarch as its founder? (The only monarch associated with the Illuminati is King Solomon, and his relevance lies not in his crown but his revolutionary opposition to the Jewish God.) Why would an Illuminati Grand Master write to a member about such a matter instead of discussing it in a closed session of the Illuminati, with the customary requirement of complete secrecy? It is also claimed that three princes and various barons belonged to the Illuminati. Is this likely given the Illuminati’s republicanism, their opposition to aristocrats and their leading role in the French Revolution, which led to the smashing of the power of the French monarchy and aristocracy, and the creation of a French Republic?)
Q. Did AW reject Catholicism and the Jesuits?
A. Yes. He became a Gnostic and therefore an enemy of the Satanic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. He was content to be described as a deist rather than a theist. Anyone who understands Gnosticism will see why this should be so.
Q. Was AW influenced by the European Enlightenment?
A. Yes. He was a radical freethinker, but he did not go down the atheist/agnostic path as so many other leading thinkers did. He wanted to bring the light of knowledge/gnosis to those in the dark thrall of Satan.
Q. Was the Illuminati part of Freemasonry?
A. No. Freemasonry was a creation of the Illuminati, though it then evolved undesirably (paradoxically due to its success in America Masons) and eventually became everything the Illuminati opposed i.e. Freemasonry was corrupted and transformed itself into the very oppressive establishment it once resisted. (The vast majority of members of the Old World Order today are senior Freemasons.) The Illuminati did not travel the same path as the Masons. They remained true, steadfast and untarnished, although they have never subsequently been able to shake off their connection with Freemasonry in the eyes of the unenlightened and ill-informed. The Freemasons, as a creation of the Illuminati, are not party to any secrets unknown to the Illuminati, and nor were they given access to the Illuminati’s core secrets.
Q. Did AW and the Illuminati believe in perfecting human nature?
A. Yes. (As far as possible within the framework provided by Gnosticism.)
Q. Was the Illuminati linked to the Alchemists, the Cathars, and the Knights Templar?
A. Yes. They were all Gnostic, and the Illuminati stood behind all of them.
Q. Did the Illuminati believe in the abolition of religion?
A. No. Only in the abolition of Satanic religions that enslaved and damned people (such as Judaism, Christianity and Islam.) It is true that many members of the Illuminati went under the guise of orthodox Christianity to avoid the penalties associated with heresy.
Q. Did the Illuminati believe in the abolition of government?
A. No. Only in the abolition of oppressive governments such as those of monarchs, aristocrats, and privileged elites. They opposed Communism for the same reason.
Q. Did the Illuminati believe that they should rule the world?
A. No. They wished to create a New World Order in which everyone would have the chance to go as far in life as their talents warranted. At that stage, there would be no further need of the Illuminati. The purpose of the Illuminati was to free and educate people as far as possible. A society composed entirely of free, well-educated and talented individuals would result in a society from which a new, higher type of humanity would emerge. Throughout history, most people have been neither free nor educated, and the human race has remained enslaved.
Q. Are the Illuminati linked to a Masonic elite in the present day?
A. No. The Illuminati have repudiated Freemasonry and now rank it alongside the Satanic religions. Most Freemasons are Protestant Christians: anathema to the Illuminati. (The Illuminati are enemies of all forms of Satanic Christianity. Catholicism was their great enemy historically, but Protestantism now spawns the greatest opposition to the Illuminati.)
Q. Do the Illuminati believe in a free, just, noble and unified world?
A. Yes, that is their ultimate vision, though they believe it will take many steps to get there. They believe that nationalism, patriotism, separation, isolationism, different languages, different cultures, different religions, all inevitably lead to division, suspicion, fear and, finally, conflict. Humanity should emphasise what unites it rather than what divides it. A New World Order with a single world language and a single economy where there are no boundaries and no barriers best symbolizes this new state of being. Star Trek provides a vision of such a future world. Star Trek envisages a one-world meritocracy where greed, money, nationalism, celebrity, monarchy have all been eliminated.
Q. Did AW say, “Let this circumstance of our constitution therefore be directed to this noble purpose, and then all the objections urged against it by jealous tyranny and affrighted superstition will vanish.”
A. Yes.
Q. Did AW say, “And of all illumination which human reason can give, none is comparable to the discovery of what we are, our nature, our obligations, what happiness we are capable of, and what are the means of attaining it.”
A. Yes.
Q. Do the Illuminati believe in the abolition of private property?
A. No. But they are opposed to excessive ownership of private property. They believe in a fair share for everyone. When one person gains more than his fair share, he is depriving another of his. You end up with a few families owning much of the land and wealth of a nation, thus placing massive power in their hands and outside the hands of the people. This cannot be tolerated. It is the basis of unfairness, inequality and injustice in society.
Q. Do the Illuminati believe in the abolition of the family?
A. No. But they do advocate much higher government involvement in the lives of failing families in order to save those families from themselves and stop them becoming a burden to other members of the community. All families are ultimately interdependent: a failing family affects all the families around it. Therefore government must intervene decisively to stop one bad apple spoiling the barrel, which is what happens too often in contemporary society. A huge underclass of failed families exists which sucks up taxpayers’ money and requires an extremely costly police force to keep it in order, an extremely costly criminal justice system, an extremely costly prison system, and an extremely costly welfare and social care system. These are huge costs that are never recovered. Failed families are a constant drain on the rest of society. Therefore, government must act before the failure of a family becomes cast in stone and irretrievable. No family has the right, in the name of personal freedom, to become a burden to other families.
Q. Did AW believe that the world would be improved if “every man were placed in the office for which he was fitted by nature and a proper education.”
A. Yes. This is a good definition of meritocracy.
Q. Do the Illuminati believe in democracy?
A. No. They believe in meritocracy where the vote is granted to those who have demonstrated that they can think meaningfully and productively about the issues of the day. No one should get an automatic right to a vote simply by living long enough to reach their 16th, 18th or 21st birthday.
Q. Is the Illuminati fascist?
A. No. Meritocracy is opposed to fascism. Fascism is obsessed with racial purity, nationalism, patriotism and xenophobia. Meritocracy is opposed to all of these. Ironically, many of the people who denounce the Illuminati as fascists could themselves be accurately described as fascists. The nationalist American “patriots” who despise their government, who rail against the Illuminati, who hate foreigners, who have never ventured out of their country, would all be classified by the Illuminati as dangerous fascists. Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber, is a classic example of an American patriotic fascist. The racist, slave-loving, Masonic Confederate States of America currently furnish most of the enemies of the Illuminati.
Q. Was Albert Pike a member of the Illuminati?
A. No. Pike was a racist, pro-slavery Confederate officer who loathed poor Irish immigrants arriving in America. He was a leading thinker in the type of Freemasonry that had become anathema to the Illuminati. Pike’s version of Freemasonry has been appropriated by the Old World Order since it is compatible with their aims and agenda. The supposed connection of Pike to the Illuminati is absurd. He represented everything that people like Adam Weishaupt fought against. Why would a society that wanted to overthrow tyranny support racism and slavery? It is unthinkable, and all the conspiracy theories that link Pike to the Illuminati are idiotic.
Q. Was Giuseppe Mazzini a member of the Illuminati?
A. No. He wished to join the Illuminati, and was originally viewed favourably. He went through several stages of initiation before being deemed unsuitable. He set up a false version of the Illuminati that soon disappeared. His false Illuminati is at the root of many of the sinister rumours that surround the Illuminati. However, it must be acknowledged that not all of his activities were deemed hostile to the interests of the Illuminati.
Q. Did the Illuminati ever cease to exist?
A. No. The Illuminati has been in continuous existence since its inception. There have been no breaks, though it has sometimes operated under alternative names to prevent detection by its enemies. It has never been suppressed, and has never disbanded.
Q. Is the Illuminati’s political vision based on Plato’s Republic?
A. In fact, Plato’s Republic is based on the Illuminati’s political vision.
Q. Are the Illuminati opposed to liberty?
A. No. They are champions of liberty. They want people to be as free as possible within a just, fair meritocracy. They oppose “freedom” where it allows disproportionate appropriation of resources (by the super rich, for example), thus starving others of resources and making others less free than they would otherwise be.
Q. Are the Illuminati linked to American “neocons”?
A. No. The neocons wish to impose the bondage of the Satanic Old World Order upon the whole of humanity. How could a revolutionary movement such as the Illuminati that has always sought to overthrow the forces of privilege ever be associated with “conservative” thinking? The Old World Order simply wish to extend their current political model all across the globe (best summarised as American “democratic” market capitalism). In no sense do they wish to create a New World Order. They aim to give the world more of the same; nothing new. The New World Order of the Illuminati means an entirely new economic, religious and political model for humanity, with meritocracy at its core. The Old World Order would have no place in the Illuminati’s New World Order. All of their wealth and power would be stripped from them. That, of course, is why they fear the Illuminati so much and why they spend so much time engaged in propaganda against the Illuminati.
Q. Did the Illuminati have a strong involvement in the Scottish War of Independence against England, the English Civil War, the American Revolution, the French Revolution, the American Civil War, the Irish Easter Uprising, the Russian Revolution, the Cuban Revolution, and many other risings and revolutions?
A. Yes. There is Illuminati involvement in most revolutions, rebellions and uprisings. It is usually advantageous to the Illuminati to destabilise the power of the Old World Order in any part of the world at any time. However, the Illuminati will not support causes with which they have no sympathy, even if they might provide tactical gains.
Q. Do the many conspiracy theories involving the Illuminati have any basis in truth?
A. Most conspiracy theories are absurd – a hotchpotch of paranoid rants and crazy links between things that have no connection whatsoever. How can a secret society such as the Illuminati that has always opposed monarchy, excessive wealth and privilege be placed alongside the super rich, royalty and dynastic families in the pantheon of conspiracy theories? It is ludicrous and merely reflects the stupidity of the people who hold these nonsensical views. To say that the Illuminati, a society that has had to flee the persecution of the Old World Order, are the puppetmasters behind the scenes is too ridiculous for words. Any conspiracy theorist who is unable to distinguish between the Old World Order and the New World Order hasn’t even begun to understand the true nature of the world. Conspiracy theorists tend to assemble a list of everything they fear and hate then put them all together into one huge conspiracy, no matter that the pieces simply don’t fit together. Any conclusions that flow from such an idiotic collection of incompatible ingredients are invariably laughable. The Old World Order is extremely right wing. The Illuminati would be considered on the left (though, in fact, they reject many liberal, left wing nostrums). Saint-Just, Robespierre and Marat, all members of the Jacobin Club in revolutionary France, were senior members of the Illuminati. The only reason such people would visit Bohemian Grove would be to burn it down. It is always wrong to shoehorn right wing and left wing groups together.
Q. Are the Illuminati wealthy?
A. The Illuminati have many priceless artefacts in their possession. However, they would never sell any of these items since they reflect the history and the great religious secrets of the Illuminati. So, their wealth is simultaneously vast but in no way realisable. Some individual members are wealthy; most are not and some are distinctly poor.
Q. What are the secrets of the Illuminati?
A. The Illuminati have been open about their political agenda, but they will not comment expansively upon the most secret religious and spiritual matters until the moment is right.
Q. Are the Illuminati party to an astonishing religious mystery, a great secret?
A. Yes.
Q. Will the Illuminati’s forthcoming book The Soul Camera reveal any of their secrets?
A. This book will be a mixture of fact, fiction and disguised facts. The well-informed will gain many insights. For others, it will simply be a story.
It is in the name of truth, justice and freedom that the Illuminati will one day deliver the just, equitable and meritocratic New World Order humanity is crying out for.
“It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom – for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.” –The Declaration of Arbroath, Scotland, 1320
******
Quotations by Adam Weishaupt.
“When man lives under oppressive government, he is fallen, his worth is gone, and his nature tarnished.”
“This is the great object held out by this association; and the means of attaining it is illumination, enlightening the understanding by the sun of reason which will dispel the clouds of superstition and of prejudice.”
“And of all illumination which human reason can give, none is comparable to the discovery of what we are, our nature, our obligations, what happiness we are capable of, and what are the means of attaining it.”
“Nothing would be more profitable to us than a right history of mankind.”
“But I would have executed much greater things, had not government always opposed my exertions, and placed others in situations which would have suited my talents.”
“But alas, they are all sadly deficient, because they leave us under the domination of political and religious prejudices; and they are as inefficient as the sleepy dose of an ordinary sermon.”
“Morality will perform all this; and Morality is the fruit of Illumination.”
“My general plan is good, though in the detail there may be faults.”
“Whoever does not close his ear to the lamentations of the miserable, nor his heart to gentle pity; whoever is the friend and brother of the unfortunate; whoever has a heart capable of love and friendship; whoever is steadfast in adversity, unwearied in the carrying out of whatever has been once engaged in, undaunted in the overcoming of difficulties; whoever does not mock and despise the weak; whose soul is susceptible of conceiving great designs, desirous of rising superior to all base motives, and of distinguishing himself by deeds of benevolence; whoever shuns idleness; whoever considers no knowledge as unessential which he may have the opportunity of acquiring, regarding the knowledge of mankind as his chief study; whoever, when truth and virtue are in question, despising the approbation of the multitude, is sufficiently courageous to follow the dictates of his own heart – such a one is a proper candidate.”
“The tenor of my life has been the opposite of everything that is vile; and no man can lay any such thing to my charge.”
“Of all the means I know to lead men, the most effectual is a concealed mystery.”
__________
One World:
Why is the idea of a one-world government so terrifying to so many people? What underlies this ferocious hostility to the idea of a united world, a single humanity, with everyone granted equal rights, civil rights and human right? Star Trek presents a one-world vision. How many people regard Star Trek as a totalitarian dystopia?
If a one-world government of the utmost merit were in power, who would condemn it other than racists, xenophobes and nationalists? – the legions of small-minded bigots and “patriots” who have never ventured more a few hundred miles from where they were born and know nothing of the world at large, nothing of history and culture.
The enemies of a New World Order are contemptible, petty minded, isolationist rednecks, ignoramuses one and all. They prefer to sail in their Ship of Fools over the edge of the Flat World they still inhabit. These people are dinosaurs, doomed to extinction.
__________
Heaven on Earth?
Most people in the world believe in a creator God, and most believe in a heaven – a paradise where God resides with those of his creations who have attained salvation.
There is no suggestion that heaven is anything other than a one world order with a single benevolent and infallible leader. So, aren’t those believers who oppose a one-world order somewhat perverse? In a religious context, they fully support a one-world order under God, so why not a man-made one-world order? The best human world, many would say, is the one that best approximates heaven, and whose rulers best approximate the role of God, the supreme, benign ruler. Is such a world possible? Can human beings raise themselves towards the divine?
Would the members of the anti-New World Order movement oppose God in heaven? They appear to reject all forms of the brotherhood of man. They want to have separate countries, with different languages and different religions, with barriers and boundaries everywhere. They love building walls between themselves and others. Is it any wonder we live in such a divided, hostile, suspicious world when so many people are dedicated to alienating themselves from others? The members of the anti-New World Order movement are insular, petty, small-minded, with no grand vision of humanity. They have no vision at all other than arming themselves with assault rifles and shooting anyone who comes round to collect taxes from them. Can these people possibly be regarded as fine human beings? It is no wonder they hate the Illuminati so much.
__________
The Archons:
These are the ultimate puppet masters: the “unknown superiors”. There are 144 of them and their task is to maintain the Old World Order in perpetuity. They are opposed by 36 equivalents – the Phosters (the Illuminators) – whose mission is to accomplish the overthrow of the Old World Order and the creation of a New World Order. The former outnumber the latter by four to one, and this reflects the degree of difficulty of defeating the Old World Order. We may be saying much more about the archons and their malignant influence on history in the forthcoming book The Soul Camera.
__________
The Old World Order:
“[The professed object of the Illuminati is], by the mutual assistance of its members, to attain the highest possible degree of morality and virtue, and to lay the foundation for the reformation of the world by the association of good men to oppose the progress of moral evil.” –Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, Albert G. Mackey
It is often claimed that neocons, Freemasons, various powerful secret societies etc are conspiring to create a New World Order – a oneworld oppressive government, supposedly. In fact the groups mentioned constitute not the “New” but the Old World Order and their agenda is to keep extending their existing political and economic model that has served them so well for so long. There is absolutely nothing new about it. “Globalisation” is their key word. That is their code for complete OWO control of the world. When former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown spoke of “the birth pangs of a new global order,” he was referring to the political and economic domination of the whole world by the OWO.
“New World Order” is a misnomer unless used in the context defined by the Illuminati. A New World Order means a new political, economic and religious configuration of the world. It does not mean an existing model simply extended further. A New World Order is precisely that – something never seen before. It is the gateway to a greater and nobler humanity.
The Old World Order’s plan is not mysterious or strange. It is the simplest one imaginable, and it is tacitly supported by many people who claim to oppose the Old World Order. It is this: how do I ensure that my family is more successful than other families? As soon as you let that thought enter your head you are damned. It is the gospel of the Old World Order, their morality, their path to “salvation”.
The issue could not be simpler. If you have the opportunity to place your family above more talented families, what will you do? Will you make the most of that chance, or will you refrain? Will you sacrifice the interests of your family to those of more talented strangers, or will you do everything in your power to give your family an advantage over those strangers? Do not call yourself a meritocrat if you want the untalented members of your family to prosper more than the talented members of other families.
The remarkably untalented Bush family has dominated American political life because it is the ultimate manifestation of the desire of the American family to glorify itself no matter that it lacks any trace of merit. But are not all families like that? That is what the Old World Order relies on. It succeeds because it is the ordinary family writ large. All typical families would do the same in their position. They would use their wealth and power to rig the system in favour of the members of their family. They do not care about the objective merits of their family, or of other families.
If you are a genuine meritocrat, you would support the most meritorious person over a close member of your own family. How many would actually do that in practice?
There can be a fair world only if there is a willingness to acknowledge the superior merit of others. That is the great challenge to humanity. It is also the only way for any family to get true justice. If you do not believe in merit then you will be ruled by rich and privileged families such as the Bush family. They have used their advantages to the maximum, and your children have paid the price. And you do not deserve any better.
******
The Old World Order II:
“When you control a man’s thinking you do not have to worry about his actions. You do not have to tell him not to stand here or go yonder. He will find his ‘proper place’ and will stay in it. You do not need to send him to the back door. He will go without being told. In fact, if there is no back door, he will cut one for his special benefit. His education makes it necessary.” — Dr. Carter Godwin Woodson
We resist two groups – the Old World Order and the group that stands behind them. For the time being, we shall say nothing more about the organisation that hides behind the curtain. The Old World Order are dupes, but they are unaware of it. Their game is the oldest one of all – power. How to get it and how to maintain it. These are the key points about the OWO, their modus operandi:
1) The OWO is a global network of dynastic families.
2) Their mission is to maintain the power and wealth of their dynasties in perpetuity.
3) Others are admitted to the charmed circle only if they can assist the interests of the OWO.
4) The OWO do not care about the welfare of ordinary citizens. Ordinary people simply do not show up on their radar as long as they go about their humdrum lives in the expected way.
5) The OWO have no plans to build concentration camps, or slave encampments or anything else. Such measures would consume vast resources, create unnecessary trouble and serve no useful function. The OWO can sedate the people by the use of TV, Hollywood, video games, porn, music, alcohol, recreational drugs, sport, social networking etc. All of these diversions ensure that the people will never rise up. While mindless mass entertainment exists, the OWO require no concentration camps to control the people.
6) The Bush family is the quintessence of the OWO. Father and son belonged to Yale’s Skull and Bones secret society and both became presidents. Another son is a former Governor of Florida and a potential future president. How can one family in a so-called democracy have achieved this degree of power?
7) The Bush family illustrates the workings of the OWO perfectly: very rich, very powerful, very connected, and likely to bestride the American political scene for generations.
8) The OWO do not obsessively control every aspect of life. What they do is take active steps to massively increase the likelihood that they and theirs will have vastly better chances in life than everyone else. George Bush, with his limited abilities, would have achieved nothing significant in life were his name not Bush. Yet because that is his name, he was an American President. The OWO always put family above talent. This is practically enshrined as an American principle, and enjoys huge popular support, yet its inevitable consequence is that it creates unmeritocratic family dynasties that endure for millennia, and you can be certain the Bush family will continue to be such a dynasty.
9) Most people are familiar with America’s great dynastic families: they are associated with oil, banking, entertainment, media, military, the intelligence services and politics.
10) The OWO are international. American dynastic patriarchs have much more in common with Russian oligarchs than they do with ordinary Americans.
11) The Old World Order’s models are the Roman Empire at the time of Augustus Caesar, and the English monarchy at the time of Henry VIII.
12) The OWO are advocates of dynastic rule. Look at America: George Bush, father and son – both American presidents; the Kennedys – they could have been in power for decades had they not broken the rules of the OWO and paid the price; the Clintons – husband was president and wife still could be; daughter might be in the future. Dynastic presidencies have become de rigueur in modern America. How did this come about? By accident or design?
13) The Roman emperors advocated “panem et circenses” – bread and circuses. As long as citizens have fast food and cheap entertainment to pacify them, they will not cause serious trouble. Revolutions occur when the ordinary people are starving and have nothing to distract them from their suffering. Can a revolution be launched in the absence of these factors?
14) The Romans had a patrician class (the wealthy and powerful) and a plebeian class (the ordinary people). Isn’t it the same in America? The super rich, the Ivy League brigade, spoiled heiresses, the political, media, military, business, banking and legal elites. They are the American patrician class. Everyone else is a plebeian.
15) Roman gladiators were worshipped by the plebeians. What do the Americans have? – super-celebrities from Hollywood, TV, rock ‘n’ roll and sport, worshipped by legions of American plebeians.
16) In ancient Rome, artists and intellectuals were a joke. They were usually Greek slaves. Look at artists and intellectuals in America. They are not at the forefront of the national consciousness. The OWO despise intelligence amongst plebeians and do their utmost to ensure that plebeians are poorly educated. They advocate and encourage “dumbing down”.
17) The Roman Empire was founded on slavery. So was America. The ordinary American people are still slaves. The only difference is that the oppression they suffer is not overt.
18) Look at the British Royal family. The Queen refers to the British people as her “subjects”. She can’t be removed as head of state. Her crown, her status, her wealth and power will be automatically transmitted to her son. No one else is eligible. Merit in Britain is effectively illegal since the head of state is never at any stage subjected to any meritocratic criterion. Britain remains one of the most class divided societies in the world.
19) Look at British politicians. Tony Blair, from a highly privileged background, was a recent prime minister, and now his children are being groomed to follow in his footsteps. The new British Prime Minister, David Cameron, leader of the Conservative Party, is one of the richest men in the nation. He is an “old Etonian” (Eton College is the most privileged school in the world) and was a member of the super elite Bullingdon Club at Oxford University. His closest colleagues all come from similarly privileged backgrounds. Like Cameron, the current Mayor of London and the Chancellor of the Exchequer both attended the Bullingdon Club.
21) Three of the forty-four presidents have been members of the tiny, elite secret society Skull and Bones. What are the odds? John Kerry, the Democratic candidate in 2004, was a member of Skull and Bones. In other words, no matter if you voted Democrat or Republican in 2004, you would still get a Skull and Bones man in the White House. And you think you have a choice? Choice is an illusion in so called democracies. Democracy is an instrument used to control the people and make them vote for their OWO oppressors. You are much less likely to oppose someone for whom you have voted. You have bought into their mind control system. What good is a vote if you can only vote for the two people they decide to put in front of you? In order for them to be permanently in charge, they simply need to ensure that they control the process by which the presidential candidates are chosen. Then, when you vote, you are invariably voting for one of their people, not one of yours.
22) No doubt there are more Bushs, more Kennedys, more Skull and Bones members being lined up for future high political office.
23) If you’re not one of the patricians, you’re a nobody. People could choose to stand up and do something about it but they don’t because they have been stupefied by the rhetoric and propaganda of the patrician class, they have got their bread and circuses that keep them endlessly distracted, they have their gladiator heroes to worship, their army of imperial conquest to support, their conspiracy theorists to mock, and their ‘freedom and democracy’ to trumpet.
24) The symbolic head of the Old World Order is the Queen of England. When she parades through the streets, legions of people wave flags and cheer. They are ecstatic about being her subjects – her acknowledged inferiors in every way. That shows you the power of the tyrants. Now imagine a hereditary monarchy with executive power. That’s what the Old World Order seek. They dream of dynastic marriages. Imagine a future where the Prince of America marries the Princess of China. That’s what’s coming if the Old World Order achieves its full ambition.
The Old World Order is all about establishing a permanent patrician class. It looks to the mediaeval concept of the monarch appointed by “divine right” and able to pass the crown down the family line forever.
The Old World Order has in fact already achieved about 90% of its agenda. Ordinary people don’t get a look in when it comes to genuine power and the best jobs. They’re not in the game. They’re plebeians. What’s worse, they deserve to be. They have it within our power to overthrow the patricians at any time. Instead, they let them rule. There are no excuses.
The movie The Matrix is an excellent metaphor for the workings of the OWO. The controllers of the Matrix are the OWO. Most people are oblivious to the truth. Only a handful care, and only they see “reality”. Mr Smith and his fellow super agents are the OWO’s enforcers who will deal with anyone showing any signs of resistance. But they don’t need to intervene too much because hardly anyone causes any trouble. Even some who have tasted the truth (like “Cypher” in The Matrix) decide that they would prefer to go back to the world of enslavement (made delightful by the power of fantasy – the taste of “real” steak).
Are you happy to be a compliant citizen of the Matrix, or are you prepared to join the resistance? Wake up. Stop voting for the OWO. Stop supporting them. Stop making their lives easy. Stop bowing down to them simply because they are wealthy. Their wealth was gained through manipulation, not merit. If you are a slave to money then you are a pawn of the OWO. They control wealth and hence they control all those who buy into the wealth system.
Dick Fuld, former chief executive officer of the failed Lehman Brothers investment bank, made $500 million dollars while he was at the helm. A half a billion dollars for the man who presided over one of history’s greatest financial catastrophes! The bank no longer exists. Fuld is not in jail, is not being prosecuted, is not being pursued by state agencies to surrender his earnings that are now seen to be the profits of breathtaking speculation and incompetence that destroyed the bank.
Many people have paid the price of the collapse of Lehman Brothers. One person who did not was the man most responsible. That is the way the Old World Order operate. Everyone suffers except them. Isn’t it time to wake up and smell the coffee? There are still enough truth seekers in the world to make a difference. The flame of resistance has not yet been extinguished. And never forget – behind the Old World Order stands something much worse.
The Last Bling King by Mike Hockney presents a fictional version of the overthrow of the Old World Order by a group that resembles the Illuminati, though is not called by that name. The book shows that a secret group like the Illuminati can be a catalyst for change, but actual change comes about only when the people will it, when they change themselves from within. It shows that many people are seduced by the OWO, and that only a radical change in their inner selves will allow them to escape the OWO’s deadly Siren song.
__________
7/14
Tags: Academia Iluministă
Academia Iluministă (39)
For Us or Against Us?:
We receive many questions and enquiries. Two of the most persistent questions are shown below.
Dear Sirs,
I am having some trouble fully understanding your mission and views. Two questions:
1) Are you for, or against, the new world order? Why?
2) Do you view Lucifer as good or evil (Satanic)? Why? If either of my questions is inherently flawed due to a fundamental misunderstanding please educate me.
Thank you.
Responses to these and follow-up issues are provided below.
1) Are you for, or against, the new world order? Why?
If someone is opposed to a “new world order”, it implies that they are content with the current world order. Who, other than those controlling the world, would be happy with the current state of affairs? Do you believe that you are leading the sort of life to which your talents entitle you? Are you being held back because you do not have the right “name”, the right “connections”? Do you see untalented people all around you who are doing far better than you? Do you feel dissatisfied at a profound level? Are you aware that something is fundamentally wrong with the way the world is ordered? You can’t quite put your finger on it, but you know this can’t be the way things were meant to be.
The Illuminati, in relation to their secular mission, seek to disrupt the functioning of the Old World Order: the overt power structure that rules the world and holds so many in its thrall (there is also a covert power structure). A new world order is in the interests of all, bar the current rulers of the world. Everyone who is not one of the Old World Order rulers should be doing everything in their power to topple the Old World Order. So, yes, we are entirely supportive of a new world order that will sweep away the corruption of the old, criminal order.
It is absurd for people to campaign against a hypothetical new world order rather than resist the current world order. It is the present that shapes the future and it is the past that shapes the present. The Old World Order have controlled humanity for millennia and have been resisted for millennia, with the Illuminati leading the resistance. The Old World Order controlled the past, they control the present and they will control the future unless the people awake from their slumbers.
To prevent the people from waking up is one of the Old World Order’s primary missions. In the past they favoured brute coercion, but their tactics have evolved to an astonishing degree of sophistication. They almost never use crude tactics nowadays. They are masters of psychological manipulation. The most useful form of slavery is the one in which the slaves imagine they are free. The Old World Order does not need death camps or barbed wire or electrified fences or soldiers or police or cattle wagons or surveillance or spies or enforcers. People, voluntarily, don the chains of slavery and bow down to their masters. Is that not genius? If you cannot appreciate the skill of the Old World Order, you can never triumph over them.
Every four years Americans go to the polls to vote for their own enslavement. At the end of each presidential term, the great family dynasties that rule the world still rule the world. Nothing changes. Puppet politicians posture in front of the cameras, but the power structures of the Old World Order remain in place, more secure than ever.
If you want an example of how the Old World Order operates, consider this: David Cameron, the British Prime Minister, attended Eton College (the most exclusive private school in the world) then went to Oxford University, one of the world’s most elite universities, where he joined the Bullingdon Club: a secretive, elite society exclusively for extremely wealthy students (rather like Yale’s Skull and Bones). He is married to the daughter of Viscountess Astor. His close friend, the second-in-command of the Conservative Party and Britain’s Chancellor of the Exchequer, is Gideon (George) Osborne, another person who went to an elite private school, then Oxford University, where he also joined the Bullingdon Club. Osborne’s father is a baronet.
Osborne has friends like investment banker Nathaniel Rothschild (Eton, Oxford University, Bullingdon Club, son of Baron Rothschild, member of the notorious Rothschild banking dynasty). In Corfu, they had dinner on the luxury yacht of Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, one of the richest men in the world (and one of the handful of men who mysteriously took possession of huge chunks of Russian industry at almost no cost when Soviet Communism collapsed). Also in attendance was Lord Mandelson (grandson of Baron Morrison and a senior member of the former UK government, and also an Oxford man, like his close friend Tony Blair, a former prime minister. Blair went to school at Fettes College, Scotland’s version of Eton).
This is how the Old World Order operate. Well-connected, wealthy, privileged people meet on the yachts of the super-rich to carve up the world between them. All of the important decisions that so crucially affect the lives of ordinary people are taken in these secret meetings behind firmly closed doors. The changes in financial regulation that led to the catastrophic credit crunch were taken at such meetings. The Old World Order decide what is best for themselves and then carry out these policies “in the name of the people”. They don’t consult the people, they don’t care about the people, yet they expect the people to vote for them. And, remarkably, the people do.
Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, has a familiar background: Eton, Oxford, Bullingdon Club. In the USA, the members of secret societies like Skull and Bones and Bohemian Grove carve up America. Aren’t you getting the picture? Why are these people allowed to get away with it? Who is standing up to them? You? Or are you waving your flag and voting for them? Did you vote for George W Bush (Skull and Bones), or his father (Skull and Bones)? Were either of these men talented in any way, or did they rise to the top of the nation because their name was Bush?
If you want to help the Old World Order then watch your junk TV, play your junk video games, worship your celebrities, go see your sporting gods, vote in elections, drink yourselves into a stupor, take drugs every day, buy a property you can’t afford and spend your life repaying the debt, hold down a soul-destroying job, say prayers to false gods in fake churches, shop till you drop in shopping mall temples of commercialism. The Old World Order will pat you on the head like the nice, compliant little dogs you are.
If you want a better future you must work for a new world order and do everything to resist the Old World Order. The Zeitgeist movies are a good introduction to how the Old World Order operates, the means it uses to systematically deceive humanity and maintain its power indefinitely. Democracy, like mainstream religion, is a means to bind the people to their own enslavement. The antidote to democracy is meritocracy.
Isn’t it time to face the truth? If you haven’t gone to the right schools and colleges, if you don’t have the right name and the right connections, you are almost certain to be a nobody in life. Is that what you want? If not, join the resistance. Stand up to the Old World Order.
Of course, the Illuminati is a secret society too, but no one who belongs to any of the Old World Order power structures can ever be admitted to the Illuminati. The Illuminati is a strict meritocracy and mostly consists of highly intelligent individuals (including autodidacts) who are capable of understanding the great mystery that the Illuminati have protected for millennia.
2) Do you view Lucifer as good or evil (Satanic)? Why?
The world’s main religions are entirely false. They are the creation of false prophets working for the Old World Order. They are a central means of psychological control of the masses.
The word Satan means “Adversary”. Lucifer means Light Bearer. Do these names have any connection with Evil? Do not listen to the preachers of falsehoods. Are 9/11, the Inquisition, witch burnings, extermination camps, torture, war, crusades, suicide bombings, pogroms, massacres, persecutions, the works of people who believe in a benign, peace-loving God of love? Or of those who believe in a God who is a sadistic monster who bathes in blood and glorifies cruelty, injustice, greed, horror and terror? Would any decent person worship the Allah of the 9/11 hijackers? What kind of person would expect to be rewarded by “God” for slaughtering thousands of people in a sickening bloodbath?
Do not be obsessed with labels. The names Satan and Lucifer have become so corrupted by misuse that they mean practically nothing now. The Armageddon Conspiracy pits Lucifer against Satan, and equates Satan with Allah/Jehovah/God.
Lucifer, as defined in The Armageddon Conspiracy, is the True God’s chief and most beloved angel. Satan (Allah/Jehovah/God) is the True God’s implacable enemy. The crucial issue is whether you worship the True God, or have been deceived into worshipping a false God.
So, unless we know what you mean by Satan/Lucifer, we cannot say whether we view him as good or evil. Lucifer, as we define him, holds a position of extreme honour and is most certainly on the side of good. He is the standard bearer of the forces of light against the hordes of darkness.
Similarly, the term “New World Order” is often portrayed in extremely negative terms thanks to the highly effective propaganda of the Old World Order, and may or may not mean something sinister, depending on your stance and what you’ve seen, heard and read.
******
Follow-Up.
Thank you for your response. In an effort to clarify certain matters you have introduced, I have several follow-up questions. But first I believe it would be helpful to more carefully define “new world order”, as it seems there are at least 2 different definitions.
You say that “If someone is opposed to a “new world order”, it implies that they are content with the current world order.” I’m not so sure everyone would agree with that depending on how you define it…
As I’m sure you are aware, there are now many sources (proliferating by the day) that warn of an impending “new world order” wherein the not-so-insidious goal is the further consolidation of power via formation of a one world government, a one world army, and a one world bank to be controlled by the elite few in a totalitarian type state (often termed “global enslavement”) (let’s term it “NWO- 1”). However, you seem to be defining new world order very differently – i.e. as a meritocracy (let’s term it “NWO-2”). NWO-1 and NWO-2 seem to be extremely different visions. Please compare, contrast, and clarify. Are you in favor of both or just the latter? Why?
If NWO-2 is your utopia, what is the roadmap to getting there? Is NWO-1 an intermediate (or unnecessary) step? Please explain…
You say that “the term ‘New World Order’ is often portrayed in extremely negative terms thanks to the highly effective propaganda of the Old World Order.” Are you suggesting that the current negative views by many regarding NWO-1 is actually emanating from those in power, or are you again really referring to your NWO-2 here? See how confusing it is to speak of NWO without properly defining it and clearly differentiating your definition from that of others…
In your “Conspiracy Theories” section on your website you seem to be debunking many conspiracy theories as a whole. This seems at odds with your apparent promotion of the Zeitgeist movie which, as you know, presents a number of conspiracy theories. Please resolve this apparent inconsistency. Which conspiracies do you endorse? Which don’t you endorse?
Thank you.
Response.
If a uniquely powerful secret society intent on world domination has existed for thousands of years, it follows that the world we see today is the product of their handiwork. If the world we see around us is not their creation then clearly they do not have the power claimed for them, and hence there is no reason to fear them. Either a supremely potent organisation exists that makes the world dance to its tune, or it doesn’t. If it does exist, this must be its world. Not a future world, this world.
The Illuminati state that the world of today is very close to the one envisioned by those – the enemies of the Illuminati – who seek to perpetually exploit and enslave humanity. The idea that enslavement necessarily consists of chains and concentration camps is risible. A sophisticated secret society attempts to control populations through psychology rather than primitive force. Slaves are much less efficient, and much more expensive and difficult to control, than dutiful workers who toil hard in the mistaken belief that they are helping themselves. In fact, the vast majority of people who go to work every day are doing little more than making their bosses (their masters in all but name) much richer. The super rich scarcely inhabit the same world as ordinary people now.
The British invented concentration camps in the Boer War in the 19th Century. If the masters of the world thought it was in their interest to deploy concentration camps you can be sure we would already be living in them. None of the people who warn of concentration camps ever have a convincing rationale for what purpose would be served by such camps, or why the world rulers have not already gone ahead and done it if they are so powerful. What is stopping them? The concentration camp scare story is infantile; a simplistic bogeyman vision of the world. There are bogeymen, but they are urbane, ruthless, Machiavellian puppet masters in smart suits, not childish monsters in monochrome military uniforms.
There’s only one main component missing from the Old World Order’s jigsaw. It’s a piece that they once possessed but which they lost thanks to the efforts of the Illuminati in past centuries. It’s the concept of the hereditary transmission of wealth and power. Imagine America as a monarchy rather than a republic where a king replaces the president and passes on the crown to his offspring in perpetuity. The presidency has already come to resemble this state of affairs (just consider the twelve years of presidential rule by the Old World Order’s Bush family – father and son). Just think of the absurdly high regard in which someone like “Princess” Diana was held by the American people. How long before royalty and politics are once again merged as they were for most of European history? What are celebrities if not a new form of royalty? The deluded masses have, as usual, failed to see through the Old World Order’s machinations. That is entirely as the Old World Order intends.
Don’t you see? – we are not in physical concentration camps for the simple reason that we have walked into our own prison camps of the mind. Ordinary people are so brainwashed that they actually believe the Old World Order is acting in their interests and protecting them from future horrors. The horrors, if you wake up, you will see all around you right now.
Did the people enduring the nightmare of the Second World War spend all of their time fearing what a Third World War might be like, or were they entirely preoccupied with the war they were actually in?
Those who point to a future New World Order of concentration camps are admitting that they do not find the current world situation sufficiently disturbing. They are thinking about a future war rather than fighting the war they are actually in. This is the war, here and now. Those who don’t think so have already succumbed to the Old World Order’s propaganda. How many times must it be emphasised: the Old World Order are not stupid and they are not unsubtle. If you are not horrified by this world, the one you inhabit right now, it is because you have already been successfully brainwashed, and you pose no threat to the masters of the world.
Yes, the Old World Order have introduced a concept of “New World Order” that makes people fear the future. They have spread their false definition far and wide to suit their purposes. Millions of people have fallen for it. We are fighting to reclaim the concept. It’s up to intelligent people to consider what they are reading and draw the relevant conclusions. Certainly, the existence of rival definitions is a recipe for confusion, but if we introduced a brand new term, you can be sure it would soon be deliberately sabotaged by our enemies.
There is a famous TV programme that shows a one-world future government, a one-world military and a one-world economic system that has entirely dispensed with money. It is one of the most popular TV shows of all time. It’s called Star Trek. How many people would rail against the world shown in Star Trek? – a benign meritocracy where greed and want have been eliminated by technology and by intelligent policies carried out by wise, skilled leaders. Who are the losers in Star Trek? – the super rich, the monarchs, the celebrities, the powerful dynastic families, those who bow to money. In other words, the Old World Order. Do you think the Old World Order are responsible for shows like Star Trek and online films such as Zeitgeist? Think again.
“NWO1” is an invention of the Old World Order and, sadly, many well-meaning people have been suckered into believing it. “NWO2”, a meritocracy operating in the interests of all humanity, is what is politically advocated by the Illuminati. NWO1 and NWO2 have no connection at all.
The Illuminati’s “roadmap” is and always has been ferociously difficult to implement. The Illuminati are a small group fighting across the millennia against the vast power of the Old World Order. How can a resistance group, few in number, topple monarchies and dynasties? Exceptionally, when the circumstances have proved conducive, this has proved possible (the French Revolution, for example). But the Old World Order have continually refined their tactics to make challenges to their power less and less likely.
Obviously, we in the Illuminati have no intention of revealing our precise plans, but you can be sure they involve the transformation of the ways of thinking of ordinary people, breaking the brainwashing that keeps them the slaves of their masters. The Zeitgeist movies, and futuristic visions such as Star Trek, show the sort of world humanity could be advancing towards. Why are we not? The roadblock is the same one it has always been – the Old World Order, the empire of greed, hate, war, selfishness, money, division, discord, manipulation, tyranny and oppression.
We do indeed debunk conspiracy theories, for a very specific reason. The Illuminati are a meritocracy. Throughout our history, many of our most prominent members have begun their journey as skeptics, debunkers, cynics. We wish to show such people that their current attitudes and beliefs do not preclude them from working with us. Many conspiracy theories are absurd: that does not mean that they all are, but all the people with whom we would wish to work should not be credulous and willing to swallow anything. We have chosen a tactic that might be described as postmodern. It will certainly put some people off. That is precisely the intention. Intelligent people should always retain healthy doubts until such times as they are furnished with credible evidence. Anyone who thinks the Illuminati, or anyone else for that matter, are Reptilians is in need of psychiatric help. Their delusions should not be nurtured and allow to multiply. Most of the anti-Illuminati and anti-NWO hysterics should be in mental asylums for their own protection, and to safeguard the public from their madness.
As for the followers of the Old World Order, waving their flags and bowing to their masters, they are sheeple, not people. We have no need of human sheep.
The Illuminati’s political aims are one thing. Much more important is the religion of the Illuminati. Many clues have been provided over the centuries – most notably in the legends of the Holy Grail – but they have often been absorbed and twisted by the propaganda of the Old World Order.
Finally, consider this. The German philosopher Leibniz famously said that we live in the best of all possible worlds. His logic, if you believe in an all-powerful, benign creator of this world, was infallible. If it were possible for God to create a better world than this one then he would have done so because otherwise he would be perverse and malevolent – two things that God cannot be by definition. Therefore it must have been impossible for God to create a better world than this, hence this is the best of all possible worlds. Flawless. Therefore, if you believe in such a God, you must believe that this world could be no better than it is. So don’t complain.
1) This argument is precisely the sort used by the Old World Order to justify their domination of the world.
2) The Illuminati reject it entirely.
3) Leibniz was one of the greatest figures in the Illuminati’s history.
4) In order to defeat the enemy you must understand how he thinks.
5) Do you understand?
******
Supplementals
1) You say, on the one hand, that hereditary transmission of wealth and power has been lost, but on the other hand you say that the U.S presidency has come to resemble this state of affairs. So which is it – has it been lost or re-established?
2) You say that “the Old World Order have introduced a concept of ‘New World Order’ that makes people fear the future. They have spread their false definition far and wide to suit their purposes.” Your answer is very confusing – are you suggesting that NWO-1 is NOT part of the power elite agenda? That would certainly contradict the Zeitgeist movie suggestion. I assume you mean something else so please clarify…For example, if you are suggesting that a one world government/army/financial system could actually be a good thing if handled properly are you also implying that you are OK with the global elite forming their NWO-1 as an intermediate to your NWO-2? Or are you suggesting that you must stop NWO-1 and implement NWO-2 yourselves without such an intermediate?
3) It seems that the “Illuminati” have been defined in several ways depending on who is speaking. Is this because there are several different groups calling themselves (or being called) “Illuminati”, or has one group infiltrated another and inherited/co-opted their name? For example, you seem to be implying that your Illuminati (i.e. Illuminati-2) are good people looking out for others. On the other hand, the Illuminati that many others speak about (i.e. Illuminati-1) refer to the global elite which control the world and look to re-enforce this control via the NWO-1. Also, where do the Illuminati depicted in Dan Brown’s Angels and Demons fit in? In other words, please clarify the multiple definitions of Illuminati and the chronology of the various groups if indeed one has infiltrated another?
4) You seem to be implying that your “good” Illuminati (i.e. illuminati-2) was responsible for the French Revolution. This is interesting because others (e.g. some conspiracy theorists) have attributed the French Revolution to the “bad” Illuminati (i.e. Illuminati-1). This is obviously completely contradictory to what you are saying – so which is it? Please explain…
5) Are you also suggesting that your Illuminati-2 was responsible not only for the French but also the American Revolution? As you know, many conspiracy theorists have attributed this event to the Freemasons. What is the relationship of your Illuminati-2 to the Freemasons? What is the relationship of Illuminati-1 to the Freemasons? Were the Freemasons initially comprised of Illuminati-2 only to be infiltrated by Illuminati-1?
6) What is your view of Albert Pike? Giuseppe Mazzini? Leo Taxil? In particular, was Albert Pike part of Illuminati-1 or Illuminati-2? What is your view of Adam Weishaupt? In particular, was Adam Weishaupt part of Illuminati-1 or Illuminati-2?
7) With respect to the current financial crisis, there seems to be a high level of urgency by many warning of the acceleration towards NWO-1. Does your Illuminati-2, presumably opposed to these efforts, plan to accelerate its counter-efforts as well, or is this recent urgency unwarranted?
Responses.
1) The Old World Order have always supported the principle of the hereditary transmission of wealth, power and privilege – the opposite of the Meritocratic Principle – and throughout history have largely succeeded in operating in this manner. The Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a pivotal figure in the Old World Order, refers to the British people as “hers”, as though they are her property. Most people, you would imagine, would not tolerate this. And yet the reverse is true. The vast majority of British people still support a monarchy in which they are defined as subjects rather than citizens. That demonstrates the sheer power of the propaganda of the Old World Order. They can make their tyranny be perceived as something noble and desirable. Through the heroic work of the Illuminati, manifesting itself in an assortment of revolutionary movements, the tyranny of the Old World Order has been checked to some degree, sometimes spectacularly in a few instances. The Old World Order’s response consists of a two-pronged strategy: to operate a de facto hereditary principle, and to keep the people so befuddled on junk consumerism and entertainment that they won’t notice what is happening. And they have succeeded admirably. There is no contradiction between losing something and trying to re-establish it. The question, as it has been posed, reflects a certain way of thinking that sets up false binary oppositions. The specific answer, as should be obvious, is yes to both: the Old World Order’s formal hereditary principle has been largely lost, but they have established a de facto hereditary principle (i.e. largely re-established that which was lost), with the Bush Family providing the clearest example.
2) Your confusion arises from your misconceptions. NWO-1 is a fiction. As has been repeatedly stated, the Old World Order is the only power elite with which people should concern themselves. How would the alleged NWO-1 come into being if not through the efforts of the existing world power elite? – therefore NWO-1 can be viewed only as an extension of the existing ideology and policies of the Old World Order. Do people seriously imagine that there is massive conspiracy taking place right now regarding which none of the world’s current power elite have any knowledge? How absurd. The NWO-1 propaganda has brilliantly led people astray, which was of course its function. Do not resist your current masters; instead waste your time and energy worrying about a fictional future state. How many have fallen into this trap?
A typical NWO-1 diatribe goes like this: “A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population. There will be no middle class, only rulers and the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simply be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited.” (Dr John Coleman, Conspirators Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300 (1992).)
We agree with a few of the points raised here but most of it is patently ridiculous. How many times must we repeat: a) this is infantile scare-mongering b) the Old World Order aren’t morons and only morons would seriously imagine that the world is in any danger of heading in the direction described. Why do people waste their time with this transparent nonsense? c) Dr Coleman and his kind are rabid, right-wing, fundamentalist Christian, anarcho-capitalist libertarians who love guns and who, in truth, are actually more terrifying than the Old World Order themselves. If you want to understand Dr Coleman and his ilk, read Ayn Rand. It is almost impossible for people to be scarier than the Old World Order and yet Dr Coleman and his sort have managed it. (And bear in mind that Ayn Rand is also greatly admired by the Old World Order.)
Regarding Zeitgeist, ask yourself this: is it possible to use a widely believed misconception to produce a positive outcome? Imagine the difficulty Zeitgeist would have if it were to attempt to argue that there is a global power elite, but that the Illuminati – the most infamous group of all thanks to the Old World Order’s propaganda – isn’t part of that elite and, indeed, is fighting against it. The message would instantly become diluted, confused and confusing – as your questions demonstrate. Much easier, don’t you think, just to run with the existing misconceptions as long as the main point is conveyed. Zeitgeist makes it vividly clear that, for millennia, the people of the world have been conspired against by a power elite. Does this not constitute an Old World Order? How can something that has been going on for millennia be referred to as “new”. We do not pretend for a moment that we can easily undo popular misconceptions. “Old World Order” is, quite simply, less catchy than “New World Order”. It sounds like an old story, whereas what people want is what is happening now, and what is coming tomorrow. They thus ignore what happened yesterday even though that controls today and tomorrow.
Yes, a one-world government/army/financial system could be a good thing if handled properly – though the difficulties are immense. There is nothing intrinsically “bad” about the concept, unless, like Dr Coleman, you despise most of your fellow human beings and want a big gun so that you can kill them. Do people fear the one world government envisaged by Star Trek? Does that resemble a horrific tyranny? What exactly do people fear so much when they automatically denounce a one-world government? If it were a one world government that was fair to everyone, was based on merit and minimal state interference, and dispensed with the power elites, who would rise up against it? (Apart from Dr Coleman and his fellow travellers who no doubt regard Captains Kirk and Picard as one-world fascists.)
NWO-1 could never be a precursor of NWO-2. NWO-2 could only come into being if the relevant political system were shown to work in an existing advanced nation, with Meritocracy replacing Democracy. Democracy is a creature of the Old World Order.
3) Yes, you have highlighted the difficulties. We have no interest in other versions/perversions of the Illuminati. It is impossible for us to control what others say about the Illuminati. Yes, the Illuminati have been infiltrated on several occasions, but never at the highest echelons. Yes, factions have been expelled that have then tried to reinvent the Illuminati in unapproved forms. And the Old World Order has always sought to malign, discredit and persecute the Illuminati. If we were to provide a precise chronology of the Illuminati, we would be aiding and abetting our enemies since they would invariably find valuable clues in any such information and be in a better position to infiltrate us. We are the Illuminati; we are not curious researchers or historians or sensationalist writers seeking to reveal the secrets of a hidden society. We are compelled to communicate in various coded ways, but there are those who understand the codes and who eventually find their way to us.
4) Indeed. Are you for or against the French Revolution? Are you a supporter of Louis XVI, Marie Antoinette and the rest of the French power elite who oppressed the French people? Do you think the British Queen is a supporter of the French Revolution? The French Revolution was one of the great moments in history when the power of the Old World Order was almost broken. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity – are you opposed to those? You have highlighted a key point. The Old World Order and their fellow travellers will say that the Illuminati’s involvement in the French Revolution illustrates some sinister influence. The only sinister thing going on in France at that time was the obscene power and arrogance of the Old World Order. When someone condemns the French Revolution, he is revealing that he is a supporter of the Old World Order and automatically showing that he is on the side of those who attack the Illuminati. “Good” and “bad” are not objective terms – their use depends on what your attitude is. If you support the Old World Order, as you seem to, you will certainly be no ally of ours and you will refer to us in terms of NWO-1. Was the American War of Independence bad and evil? The Illuminati were of course involved in that too. Who were the losers that time? – the Old World Order of the British ruling class. The tragedy is that the Old World Order have again reasserted themselves and America is full of Old World Order dynasties once more. And they find support from the likes of Dr Coleman who would no doubt despise the French Revolution and regard it as a great evil.
5) Yes, the Illuminati were heavily involved with the American Revolution. The relationship between the Freemasons and the Illuminati is highly complex. It would be fair to say that the Freemasons were once highly influenced by the Illuminati-2, to use your definition, but were infiltrated and came to be dominated by forces hostile to the Illuminati. The Illuminati now have no connection with mainstream Freemasonry and indeed Freemasonry, at his highest levels, has become the plaything of the Old World Order.
6) We would view Albert Pike on a par with Dr Coleman. Giuseppe Mazzini tried to join the Illuminati but was rejected and created a fake Illuminati organisation. In one or two instances, the real Illuminati were not opposed to Mazzini’s activities. Leo Taxil was not a member of the Illuminati but was used by the Illuminati to perform a particular task. Yes, Adam Weishaupt was an influential member of the Illuminati. The Illuminati’s mission in his time, as now, was to resist the Old World Order, monarchical governments, oppressive political systems, deceitful, Satanic religions, and the worship of material objects over the realm of the spirit.
7) All crises are potential opportunities. The Old World Order will be using the financial crisis to bankrupt business opponents and consolidate their power in ever tighter monopolies and cartels. At the end of the crisis, their wealth and power may be massively enhanced, as indeed it was in the aftermath of the Wall Street Crash and the Depression. Equally, people who are in distress are far more receptive to the voice of change in times like these, so you can be sure that the Illuminati, in many guises, are busy promoting a radical change agenda to the ordinary people of the world.
The Illuminati is a revolutionary movement that seeks to eradicate the power elite that controls the world for its own selfish ends. We advocate radical change, not the sort of “change” that gets trumpeted by American presidential candidates working within the power elite structure of Washington DC, and from whom no genuine change could ever emanate. We sometimes form temporary alliances with other groups on the basis of “our enemy’s enemy is our friend”, but we have no formal links to any other organisation.
We consider that the person who sent us these questions is not an ally of the Illuminati and is likely to be on the side that opposes us, either as a fellow traveller of the Old World Order, or as a member of an extreme anarcho-capitalist libertarian organisation that would not be amenable to the message of meritocracy. We have responded to these questions to illustrate that we are prepared to engage with the propaganda of our enemies. We have given full answers and it is up to people to reach their own conclusions regarding what we have said. Are we tyrants? Satan worshippers? Are we the proponents of the terrifying New World Order that you have heard so much about? Or are we on your side? Are we your best hope for a just future? Think for yourselves. Don’t let them brainwash you.
******
Q. The current world economic crisis seems to be getting worse. Is the OWO orchestrating this (if so, to what end? they are already powerful, why do they need more power)? Is your group involved in this crisis in any way? If no, do you plan on helping us (i.e. humanity) out at some point or are we all screwed?
The OWO caused the current economic crisis, but they did not deliberately engineer it in this instance (though they did in the case of the Wall Street Crash). For the last thirty years, the agenda of the OWO has been to minimise regulation and supervision of their activities, and to prevent the state interfering in anything they do. The “market” has been deified, but the reality is that there is no such thing as free markets. They are all rigged, and run by self-interested cartels. The aim of all cartels is to enrich themselves as much as possible. The OWO control all of the main cartels, and they all act in concert to advance the aims of the OWO.
The current economic crisis was caused by uncontrolled greed. Forget any other explanation. The amount of money a small group of super rich individuals has amassed in the last thirty years is simply staggering. They claimed they were being rewarded for magnificent performance. They said they were merely taking their fair share of the profits. No one objected.
Who stopped their greed machine? No one. Who complained? No one. Which governments intervened? None. These people were lauded. In Britain, many were knighted by the Queen (a senior member of the OWO) and made peers in the “House of Lords”. In America, governments turned to these people for advice and they were treated as great celebrities and masters of the universe. But the whole thing was a sham. The profits were illusory. They were based on “blackbox” financial instruments that no one could see into, and few understood. A handful of people spoke out regarding various abuses and suspicious activities. They were ignored. All of the fake profits of the OWO are now huge debts hanging around the necks of ordinary people that it will take generations to repay. Why have the people accepted their fate so quietly, like cows standing in the queue for the abattoir?
The OWO have themselves been financially impacted by the crisis, but if their average wealth falls from 1 billion dollars to 500 million, to what extent have they really suffered? What part of their lifestyle is altered? But someone earning $50,000 dollars who loses their job has had their lifestyle 100% impacted for the worse, even though they have lost only a fraction of the losses of the OWO in monetary terms. The Old World Order will now see the current crisis as a buying opportunity, with distressed sellers being forced to yield assets to them on the cheap, as happened in the aftermath of the Wall Street Crash. Thus, in a few years the OWO will be richer and more powerful than ever.
Nietzsche said, “Success has always been the greatest liar.” He wasn’t quite right. The illusion of success is an even greater liar. We have witnessed the greatest smoke and mirrors job in human history, the supreme confidence trick. The world bought snake oil in unprecedented quantities from shameless charlatans. No one argues with those who appear successful. No one asks awkward questions. Money flows to money. A few winners take it all. Everyone else stands by and watches, and applauds. And all the while disaster unfolds.
The Illuminati had no involvement in this crisis, but we always regarded it as inevitable. When greed is unchained, a boom results, followed by inevitable bust. The severity of this crisis is a reflection of the greed unleashed on the world. How many of the super rich have been jailed for wrecking the economy? How many have had their assets seized? The truth is that the power of the Old World Order could be shattered forever right now if the people demonstrated sufficient will. But they haven’t and they won’t.
Even now, in the midst of economic mayhem, few people have got real fire in their bellies. The Old World Order have nothing to fear at the present time. We see no signs of the widespread public discontent that needs to exist for us to make any headway against the OWO.
Also, by their skilful use of the democratic process, they have put a new face in the White House, thus removing the rage that would have been evident if Bush were still in power with years left to serve. The election of Obama has been a masterstroke by the OWO. With a single act, they have defused the bomb. But whether that remains true is another matter.
It’s not a matter of “helping humanity”. Humanity must help themselves. The only thing stopping people from bringing about radical change is themselves. Deep down, they are content to be pawns of the Old World Order. That is the supreme tragedy. If they didn’t want to be pawns, they wouldn’t be. Everyone has a choice. Most people choose the easy path, the road of least resistance, the one that requires no effort. If you always look to others, you’re definitely “screwed”.
The Illuminati can attack the Old World Order only when the people are receptive. The Illuminati were able to instigate the French Revolution only because the people were already on the streets, demanding justice. No such circumstances exist now. The people are well and truly sedated.
What is the “philosophy” of the typical family?
1) To give their children the best possible chance in life.
2) To give their children, as far as possible, an advantage over the competition.
3) To keep the family safe, secure and in good health.
4) To give the family the finest things in life.
5) To resist anyone or anything that appears to harm the interests of the family.
6) To become as successful as possible, achieve the highest possible status, and enjoy the fruits of the “good life”.
7) To pretend to be supportive of other families but, in practice, to do everything to support one’s own family, regardless of whether it’s at the expense of other families.
What is the philosophy of the Old World Order? Exactly as above.
Be in no doubt – the OWO succeed because they are carrying out the actions that families everywhere endorse, where their own narrow interests are the only interests they really acknowledge, merely paying lip-service to any other interests. But anyone who follows this philosophy gets the world we have today. It’s an entirely unproductive philosophy unless you are in the OWO. And it’s also unproductive for the OWO because they put their immortal souls in extreme jeopardy because of the selfish lives they lead.
To promote family bonds – blood ties – as the supreme good results in a horrific Darwinian struggle between rival bloodlines because there is a limited supply of the “good life”, and excessive demand for it. The result is the culture of vendettas and honour killings, literal and metaphorical, and doing anything to shaft other families in order to get your own family higher up the ladder. Behind the mask of sympathy for the plight of others lies a ruthless, self serving, savage instinct. The Bush family is the one of the most powerful OWO families. They did everything in their power to ensure that George W Bush, a person of severely limited ability, became the American President. The whole world suffered as a result. This is what happens when bloodlines are favoured over merit. The current financial crisis arises from the same source.
Meritocracy is a radically different worldview. It says that merit is a far more rational, altruistic and benign criterion in human society than blood ties. But ordinary people are resistant to it. “My family right or wrong” is their mantra.
Freemasonry was intended by the Illuminati to allow the creation of enlightened meritocratic seeds all over the world that would, step-by-step, change the prevailing OWO philosophy. Instead, Freemasons soon succumbed to the same corrupt system as the OWO. They placed the interests of their fellow Freemasons – their new “family” – above those of everyone else. Before long, the OWO and Freemasonry had merged and now Freemasonry stands at the heart of the Old World Order.
The Illuminati, if they were ever in doubt, learned the scale of the challenge facing them. If their own creation – Freemasonry – could be turned against them, what chance do ordinary people have? The OWO’s message is extremely seductive to many people, even to many of those who claim to revile the OWO. That is exactly as the OWO and their puppet masters intend. That is the nature of Satan’s world.
Q. If the current financial crisis ends up unifying the world (albeit for evil OWO-related reasons), will you then grab the unified world and make it into a meritocracy somehow?)
A. If we could “grab” the world, we would have done so long ago. We are Gnostics. This is not our world. We are operating in the enemy’s territory and the enemy has all the power. For us to succeed amounts to Satan’s grip on the world being released. Many Gnostics thought this was an impossible task, but the Illuminati realised it could be done, but only by bringing about a remarkable change in humanity, which is what we strive for.
The OWO, and their puppet masters, are doing everything in their power to maintain their hold over humanity. Do you imagine for even a moment that it is easy to defeat them?
The current financial crisis is likely to consolidate the power of the OWO. Fear has not yet turned to irresistible rage amongst the people. Far too many people still buy the OWO’s propaganda. Obama represents the ability of the OWO to keep reinventing themselves and duping the people. By the end of Obama’s time in office none of the power of the OWO will have been surrendered. The reverse will be true.
Here’s our radical message. Meritocracy can only come about in a world that has turned its back on greed. Meritocracy means that harder-working, cleverer, more talented people rise to the top, and receive higher rewards than those below them, but – and here’s the crucial point – those higher rewards are never excessive. Would you vote for a society that placed caps on what the most successful people were allowed to earn, and that blocked their ability to pass on their wealth to others? The Scottish-born American Andrew Carnegie was a remarkable individual who came from humble origins to become the world’s richest man. Despite his background, he was accepted by the OWO and became one of their most powerful figures. In his latter years, he realised the errors of his ways to some extent and chose to give away all of his money in various philanthropic undertakings. “The man who dies rich dies disgraced,” he said…and never have any truer words been spoken. The Illuminati would wish to see a world in which that principle was enshrined in law. Dynastic families – the bedrock of the OWO – are created and sustained by the transmission of great wealth from privileged parents to privileged children. To stop the OWO, all that is needed is a law to prevent the transmission of excessive wealth. That wealth should be used instead to ensure that ordinary people are given the opportunity to make the most of themselves.
Yet, if people are really truthful, they will recognise that they don’t want to curb greed. They dream of being fabulously wealthy like the members of the OWO. Despite all their talk, most people actually aspire to be part of the OWO. And that is why the OWO are winning.
It is also why more and more time is spent on portraying the “NWO” or the Illuminati as aliens from planet Nibiru. People do not wish to recognise the greed within themselves – so it’s much easier to hate people if they’re not actually human…if they’re wicked alien invaders. But the horrific truth is that the OWO – the masters of this world – are simply ordinary human beings writ large. If the ordinary person could be part of the OWO, he would be. What he resents is not getting that chance. What he ought to resent is the whole institution itself. Monarchy isn’t wrong because we can’t all be monarchs, but because it is an intrinsic evil.
__________
6/14
Tags: Academia Iluministă
Academia Iluministă (38)
The Historical Illuminati – Continued:
The Cathars – Gnostics who posed a serious religious challenge to the Catholic Church in the south of France in the Middle Ages. (The precursors of the Cathars were groups such as the Paulicians, the Athingani, and the Bogomils.) The Cathars were also associated with a strong literary tradition in the shape of the Goliards and Troubadours: this was the beginning of the Illuminati’s attempt to use stories, poetry, art, painting and sculpture to communicate concealed heresies to the wider world, to smuggle them past the Catholic authorities, and to pass on coded messages. The Cathars regarded the established Church as the “synagogue of Satan”, and the altar as the mouth of hell. The Vatican launched a crusade against them and they were virtually wiped out.
The Knights Templar – supposedly orthodox Catholic military monks who were in fact Gnostics seeking to retrieve unique treasures from the ruins of Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem, and to erode Catholicism from a privileged insider position. The Vatican eventually realised the danger and suppressed the Templar Order. The last Grand Master was burned at the stake.
The Capuciati – (from caputium, “hood”: their distinctive headgear) – a medieval precursor of the Jacobin Clubs of revolutionary France. At the end of the 12th Century, the Capuciati rose up against the nobility and tried to implement a society based on freedom and equality. They were brutally suppressed. Like the later Jacobins, they championed liberty, equality and fraternity, thus incurring the wrath of the nobles. Allegations of heresy were levelled against them and they were deemed subversive of ecclesiastical and civil authority.
The Alchemists – Gnostic thinkers who attempted to combine science and spiritualism; to find a quasi-scientific path to spiritual enlightenment. (Some alchemists were “metaphorical” scientists i.e. they were using the language of proto-chemistry to describe a process of spiritual refinement and elevation; they weren’t seriously engaged in scientific experiments.) Alchemy was conducted in such secrecy that it managed to avoid formal condemnation and persecution by the Vatican. Alchemists rarely ventured into the open, and only did so if they had secured the protection of a powerful prince. Freemasonry was born from a combination of the alchemists and the remnants of the Knights Templar.
The Heresy of the Free Spirit was a movement that flourished in medieval Europe and was based on the idea that the practitioners had reached a state of perfection that moved them beyond sin (like the Euchites). They repudiated social and moral norms and were often highly promiscuous. However, this promiscuity was more like the “free love” of the 1960s. It was frequently accompanied by drug use, was intended to spread love and community, and, above all, was aimed at being a conduit to a higher plane, to spiritual emancipation and communion with the higher self.
For Gnostics and Christians, the concept of “Holy Spirit” held a very different meaning. To Christians, the Holy Spirit was the third person of the Holy Trinity, and, in Catholic theology, acted through the Church and the holy sacraments. Catholics had no access to the Holy Spirit other than through the sacraments. For Protestants, the individual could interact with the Holy Spirit directly, without the need of the Church or any sacraments. For Gnostics, the Holy Spirit was actually a coded reference to the higher self, the divine spark. By using that term, they could masquerade as Christians and thus avoid accusations of heresy, whilst actually spreading Gnostic teachings. If they succeeded in linking to their higher self, they would be filled with spiritual, mystical understanding – gnosis itself – that would reveal the true nature of existence. Acting through their higher self, part of the divine order, they would no longer be capable of sinning. They would be truly free of the constraints and travails of the world. For this reason, they were called Eleutherians – from the Greek word for “free”. (Some groups were freer than others; some became completely anarchic and self-indulgent while others retained a strong and clear spiritual purpose. It was not freedom itself that was the crucial issue but how that freedom was exercised; irresponsibly or with clear focus.
Joachim of Fiori (a Grand Master of the Illuminati) and Amaury of Bene (a senior Illuminist) – were responsible for the revolutionary idea that the world is divided into three ages – that of God the Father (Jehovah/Judaism), God the Son (Jesus Christ/Christianity), and God the Holy Spirit (which for Joachim and Amaury meant Abraxas/Gnosticism).
The Dulcinites – under the leadership of Fra Dolcino, were a Joachimite movement with close connections to Catharism. They advocated egalitarianism and soon attracted the hostility of the Church and nobility. They were exterminated in 1307, the same year that the Templars were arrested and suppressed.
The Brethren of the Free Spirit – the Homines Intelligentiae, the Adamites, the Amalricans, the Beghards/Beguines, the Picards, the Turlupins, the Ranters and the Perfectionists were all groups of a similar type, inspired by the antinomian ideas of Joachim of Fiori and Amaury of Bene, and dedicated to absolute freedom. Because they did not perceive themselves as bound by the conventions of society, they often acted, in secret and sometimes openly, in ways that scandalised public opinion. Inevitably, they attracted the hostility of the Church and most of them were savagely persecuted.
Hieronymus Bosch was a member of the Adamite sect and his paintings are full of coded references to the teachings of the Adamites. William Blake’s paintings and writings are also full of Gnostic symbolism, and coded messages. (An important painting of Blake’s is highlighted in The Millionaires’ Death Club by Mike Hockney.)
The Hesychasts – an offshoot of the Illuminati that appeared in Macedonia in the Byzantine Empire in the 14th Century. Their activities were centred on the monastic community at Mount Athos (“Holy Mountain”). The Hesychasts were mystics who endeavoured to see a vision of the light of the True God. They regarded this contemplation as the highest goal of humanity, taking them as close as possible to the divine order, bringing them into the company of the divine spark, their higher self. In this way they could become united with God. This experience could be described as unio mystica (mystical union), the ecstatic feeling of being one with God.
In order to disguise their practices as falling within orthodox Christianity, the Hesychasts said that the light they were seeking was that of Jesus Christ’s Transfiguration on Mount Tabor where “man” and “God” visibly became one and Christ shone with the mystical light of God. After a long debate, Hesychasm was accepted as non heretical by the Eastern Orthodox Church, but was rejected, peacefully, by the Roman Catholic Church. A similar idea, originating in Spain with the Alumbrados, met with a very different fate.
The Alumbrados (also known as Aluminados) – the Spanish chapter of the Illuminati in the 15th and 16th centuries. Ignatius of Loyola was a senior member of the Alumbrados, assigned the task of infiltrating the Catholic Church with a new group modelled on a nonmilitary version of the Knights Templar. The group he founded was the Jesuit Order.
The Alumbrados recruited a number of “Conversos” – Jews who had been forced by the Spanish authorities to convert to Christianity if they wanted to remain in the country or even simply to stay alive. Many of these were well versed in the teachings of Kabbalah. “Moriscos” (forced Moorish converts) were also recruited. The Illuminati have always been happy to take new members from different traditions, provided those people are not wedded to the mainstream “religions”. The Conversos and Moriscos were usually those who were already uncomfortable with their original religions, though they had no fondness for Christianity, simply converting for convenience rather than through any conviction.
Like the Hesychasts, the Alumbrados sought to achieve a state of perfection that would allow them to experience a vision of God; a direct transcendental encounter with the divine. At that point, when they had received the “light”, they would be able to communicate directly with their higher self.
The Alumbrados were persecuted by the Spanish Inquisition, and departed from Spain. Many went to neighbouring France where they were known as the Illuminés (and sometimes as Guerinists after their local leader Pierre Guerin). The authorities suppressed them in 1635. A new grouping appeared in the 18th century, came under renewed persecution, and fled to England where they became known as “French Prophets”. Their writings influenced Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Another chapter of French Illuminati was established by Martines de Pasqually who had Spanish Conversos ancestry and great knowledge of Kabbalistic teachings. This group later became popularly known as Martinists after their new leader, Louis Claude de Saint-Martin, the so-called “unknown philosopher.” Saint-Martin advocated that human beings must find their “creative principle.” He wrote, “The only initiation that I preach and seek with all my soul is that which takes us into the heart of God and brings the heart of God into us for that indissoluble marriage which makes us friend, brother and spouse of our Divine Restorer. There is no other means to this holy initiation but to dive deeper and deeper into the depths of our being and not to let go until we can draw out the living and life-giving root.”
Another group linked to the Illuminati in this period was the Franco-Italian Carbonari (meaning charcoal burners). Some people claim the Carbonari was founded in the 19th Century in Italy, but in fact its origins lay in the 16th century in France. They were radicals dedicated to overthrowing despotic governments.
The Jesuit order (The Society of Jesus) – was established by the Illuminati as another attempt (following the Knights Templar) to infiltrate Catholicism and seize power from within. Like the Templars, they were known as “Soldiers of Christ”, though they were not a military order. The Rosicrucians – a secret order that provided the first significant public glimpse of Freemasonry. They published several enigmatic and inspirational manifestos in heavily coded language. They did not emerge into the open and thereby avoided persecution and destruction.
As for the Rosicross philosophers,
Whom you will have to be sorcerers,
What they pretend to is no more
Than Trismegistus did before,
Pythagoras, old Zoroaster,
And Apollonius their master.
(Samuel Butler)
(The Rosicrucian Order gradually became detached from the Illuminati and fell under the influence of others. It continues to this day – see, for example,http://www.amorc.org.uk/ Note that although the Rosicrucians are no longer connected with the Illuminati, many of the Illuminati’s original teachings are still evident in modern Rosicrucian thinking. Gene Roddenberry, the creator of Star Trek was a member of AMORC. Star Trek represents a very powerful image of what our society would look like if we could rid ourselves of the Old World Order. Star Trek promotes a meritocratic, noble, honest, truthful, unselfish, ambitious, intelligent, adventurous vision of humanity, free of greed and religious dogmatism. Who is preventing us from realising this futuristic paradise? – the Old World Order.)
Freemasonry – a product of enlightenment thinking, designed to overthrow the prevailing tyrannies of monarchy and Christianity. Gradually it was infiltrated by the establishment and became totally corrupt. It is now a mainstay of the Old World Order. Freemasonry is the Illuminati’s most profound regret and greatest disaster.
Thomas Jefferson – 3rd President of the USA, principal author of the Declaration of Independence, and passionate republican, was a Freemason and America’s leading member of the Illuminati. He famously said, “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” That sentiment was highly characteristic of Illuminati thinking of that time.
America was always intended to be the great beacon of hope for the world, the Illuminati’s model for how to overthrow nobles, kings, emperors and religious dogmatism; how to govern justly in the interests of all. Everything started well. Jefferson was involved with all aspects of the development of the nation, but after he left office, his power, and that of the Illuminati, waned and the Old World Order eagerly set about securing their greatest triumph. Slowly but surely they assumed complete control of America. They didn’t create nobles, princes and kings, but instead powerful, dynastic families that had as much influence as the aristocrats of Europe, and even greater riches. They turned democracy into a farce: it became merely a vehicle to ensure their continued power. That’s why the Bush’s, father and son – two OWO fools of the highest order – both reached the White House.
The fact that the Illuminati once had the world’s current hyperpower within its grasp reveals how powerful they once were, but equally reveals the brilliance of the Old World Order in reasserting its power and vanquishing its enemies. The Old World Order know that by relentlessly appealing to the basest instincts of ordinary people they will always triumph. The challenge for the Illuminati – an almost impossible one as it has transpired – is to win by cultivating humanity’s nobler aspects and higher aspirations.
The Jacobin Clubs – the most radical political groups of revolutionary France, led by the Illuminati. They initially enjoyed great success, but imploded under the strain of being forced to wage war against all of the great powers of Europe that wished to stamp out the Revolution. The Jacobin leaders were guillotined.
In Tsarist Russia in the twentieth century, the Illuminati chose to help the Bolsheviks to overthrow the corrupt Tsarist regime. Although the Illuminati opposed communism, they saw it as the lesser of the two evils when compared with rule by tyrants and autocrats. Unfortunately, communism itself soon became a tyranny under Stalin.
******
The Illuminati had no connection with the medieval German Holy Vehm vigilante secret society, contrary to what some conspiracy theorists claim. Anyone with even a superficial grasp of the Holy Vehm would know they would eagerly have hunted and executed members of the Illuminati.
Others have claimed that there was a link between the Illuminati and the Order of Assassins founded by Hasan bin Sabbah. The Assassins and the Illuminati had no formal connections, but they did respect each other. The Knights Templar encountered the Assassins in the 12th century and were intrigued by them, and wondered if assassination could be deployed as a legitimate weapon against the tyranny of the Old World Order. It’s also true that the Templars admired the enigmatic, coded motto of the Assassins: “Nothing is true – everything is permitted.” Only people of the right calibre can understand such a slogan. Stupid people will take it at face value and regard it as some sort of anarchic and nihilistic statement. It is anything but.
The Roshinaya/Rawshaniyya, a secret society in Afghanistan in the 16th century, was also said to be associated with the Illuminati. Again, this is false. The Roshinaya was related to the Assassins not to the Illuminati. The Roshinaya also had its roots in the Nuqtawiyya of Persia, a sect that appeared in the fifteenth century and taught mysticism and reincarnation. (Again, the Illuminati had respect for these groups, but no ties, although it would be fair to say that these sects were also Gnostic in their outlook.) All three sects were attacked, persecuted and largely destroyed.
Many Gnostic sects regarded themselves as “Christian” although their view of Christ was very different from that of orthodox Christianity, but the Illuminati have never been in any sense Christian.
Although Christianity is regarded as a revealed religion, it is certainly possible to treat it as a Gnostic mystery religion. Many of the cryptic remarks in the gospels are highly characteristic of the vocabulary and symbolism of Gnosticism. In such a version of Christianity, Christ becomes an exemplar of the Gnostic path to salvation. Born fully human, Jesus follows the precise path laid down by Gnostic teachings, and attains full union with his divine spark. At that point he has two fully expressed natures – human and divine – in one human person. He is both the “Son of God” (as all divine sparks can be described), and God himself. He is perfect and cannot commit sin. The Resurrection is actually Christ’s final release from the cycle of reincarnation because he has attained gnosis. Whereas Christian orthodoxy teaches that Jesus Christ was a unique incarnation of God on earth, Gnostic Christianity says that he was simply an example of what anyone is capable of achieving. Everyone can be a Christ. The miraculous “incarnation” can be repeated in each and every person. The world can be full of living gods. The Christian establishment regards such a notion as the uttermost heresy but in fact it is not
contradicted by anything that is actually said in the gospels by Jesus Christ himself.
******
The Illuminati in the present day have much less influence than of old because of several trends: the rise of consumerism, the general turning away from spirituality and towards materialism by much of humanity, the relentless advance of “junk” entertainment, the widespread delusion that people have genuine freedom and choice, the success of “democracy” in persuading ordinary people that they have a degree of political power and can change their leaders, the ease and comfort provided by technology, the omnipresence of sport, music, movies and TV that keep people endlessly distracted, the media brainwashing machine, the effectiveness of the cynical advertising machine, and the complete dominance of celebrity culture and the super-rich.
It is hard in the age of secularism and science for people to accept that a malignant, spiritual force is at work in the world. Many people think the world is a vile place but they attribute that to human failings and perceive no malevolent conspiracy beyond the purely human. Many of the great movements of the past simply could not exist in the present day. The mentality no longer exists. The Old World Order have trivialised humanity and stripped away its ability to resist. The OWO’s power has never been greater than at the present time. It will take a gargantuan effort to overthrow them.
The Illuminati plan to introduce a new organisation, not unlike some of those mentioned above, that anyone can join, and that will become the heart of the new resistance to the Old World Order. Further details will be forthcoming later. Everyone will have the chance to participate. (This group is called The Movement.)
No one should misunderstand the message of the Illuminati. The Illuminati is nothing like the Catholic Church, Judaism or Islam. It does not flaunt a “holy” text like the Bible, the Torah or the Koran in your face and demand that you slavishly worship every word. The Illuminati do not claim that they can “save” you. It is never for others to save you. Jesus Christ certainly can’t save you, no matter what the Protestant Evangelicals tell you. You can only save yourself. The Illuminati act as guides, nothing else. They can’t walk in your shoes. No one can achieve gnosis on your behalf.
We receive many messages from people, but many of them fail to get the central point. Don’t look to others for the answers to your life – only slaves do that – look to yourself. All of the answers are contained within you. You simply have to find the key to unlock them. “Simply”? In truth, it’s the most difficult task of all, but how could it be any other? How could the process of becoming God be anything other than the greatest challenge conceivable? Do you have the strength, imagination, guts and knowledge for the ultimate quest?
You don’t need the Illuminati. You already have everything you need – yourself.
Those who have what it takes may well find their way to the Illuminati, but never forget that you don’t need anyone else. The most liberating idea of all is that everyone already contains all of the answers, if they could but see the light. Don’t you think that’s exactly as it should be? You don’t need to look outwards, to the world around you, to find the meaning of life: you will find all you need when you turn your gaze inwards. The answer was always contained in the ancient Hermetic wisdom: “As above, so below.” The macrocosm and the microcosm are one and the same for those with the vision to see.
__________
5/14
Tags: Academia Iluministă
