Dacia Iluministă

1) Either the universe is created, being the work of an eternal, uncreated, perfect entity (God) – as Abrahamism maintains.

2) Or the universe is eternal and uncreated and is itself God, albeit a God evolving towards perfection – as the Enlightenment religions teach.

3) Or the universe is created out of nothing – as scientific materialism asserts, and has no connection at all with any type of God.

According to the first option, God precedes the universe as an immortal being, eternally perfect and infinitely powerful, and he creates the universe according to his own divine plan out of nothing.

According to the second option, the universe itself is God, but a God on a cosmic journey from infinite potential to infinite actualisation. This view reaches its maximum expression in the philosophy of the Illuminati Grand Master Hegel. According to the third option, God has nothing to do with anything, and nor does mind or free will, and the universe unfolds according to the implacable laws of materialistic physics. The origin of the laws of physics, the appearance of matter out of nothing and the emergence of life, mind and consciousness remain open questions in this scenario.

Atheists and Hegelians reject the possibility of an eternal, perfect God. There is no form of logic that can equate the evolutionary world we see all around us with a perfect world created by a perfect God. In particular, Abrahamists have never been able to offer any credible account of how evil, suffering and imperfection exist in a universe created as an act of supreme love (allegedly) by a perfect, all-powerful God. In fact, this God’s actions seem rather the product of the uttermost hate for humanity. He inflicts original sin on humanity, drowns the earth, and sends almost all of its souls to hell. Those he saves, he does so on a whim. So, a god or a devil?

Moreover, the universe is either a) immense beyond the imagining or b) actually infinite in extent. Why would God create such a universe? In what way would it reveal his divine plan? What could that plan possibly be? It is mad to assert that a Creator would have created an infinitely large universe. A Creator creates something special, something specific into which he pours his essence. He does not create an indiscriminate cosmic mass, without boundary or definition. No sculptor would set out to sculpt infinity – the sculpture would never have any discernible shape; it would simply continue forever. It would never be anything with a meaning. It would never be a work of art. No painter would paint infinity – it would never have any frame. It would not be something that you could gaze upon and discern its meaning. All art could actually be said to be the taming of the infinite, the deliberate act of rendering the infinite finite. Only the finite makes sense. Only the finite can be captured. Only the finite is special. An infinite process, in order to create meaning, has no alternative but to create finitude.

What is the arche, the fundamental substance of the universe? It is God in his barest, simplest, most abstract sense. A scientific term such as “dimensionless energy” could be used instead, but it is God all the same. The arche is the unconscious mind of the unconscious God. The arche has no dimensions. It does not exist in space and time since space and time do not themselves exist when existence is considered in its most elementary condition. Space and time will emerge in due course from God, but they do not exist with him as aspects of the most primitive form of existence.

Bare existence is extraordinary. It is Will to Actualisation i.e. it is pure potential that wants, that desires, that yearns, that longs for something. For what? To BECOME. To become what? To become everything it has it within itself to be. To become PERFECTION. That is why the Will to Actualisation is none other than God. Teleological potential has only one aim – to become perfect actualisation.

Bare existence comprises just this potential, this Will to Actualisation. If potential did not want to become anything then it never would. Nothing meaningful can happen without a will to make it happen. Scientists speak of the “heat death” of the universe when all the useful energy in the cosmos has been expended and nothing remains other than a freezing universe of evenly distributed atoms – eternally dead interstellar dust. Bizarrely, it has never occurred to scientists that this state is impossible for the extremely simple reason that if it were possible for the universe to be dead then it already would be given that, one way or another, the universe has existed for eternity.

Existence is not something that can be created or destroyed. It just IS. Existence is ISNESS. But it is not static. If it were, the universe would remain in one state forever, and be equivalent to, and as meaningless as, eternal, absolute nothingness. So the ISNESS of existence is always becoming a new ISNESS i.e. existence is perpetual BECOMING. Becoming involves change, energy, movement. That cannot be emphasized enough. Potential = becoming = energy = movement = change = the Will to Actualisation = the arche = bare existence = the fundamental “stuff” of the universe = teleology = entelechy = unconscious mind = God “hidden”. They all mean the same thing. The universe is driven forward because the universe is purposeful movement. If it were purposeless movement, it would just go round and round in circles, never attaining any higher states, but in fact it’s always achieving more, always evolving.

The universe cannot stop becoming. It cannot freeze. It cannot change from becoming into frozen being. It can suffer no heat death, or indeed death of any kind. It cannot be destroyed. It cannot go out of existence. The fate decreed by the Second Law of Thermodynamics is impossible. If it were possible for all energy to be used up – for becoming to stop – it would have happened infinitely long ago.

Existence, the universe, is a perpetual motion machine. How could it be otherwise? If the universe could run out of puff – if that were a possible thing that could happen, a possible state that could be attained – then it would have happened already and we would not be here to pour scorn on the idea. Particle physicists say themselves that anything not forbidden is compulsory. If cosmic heat death were not forbidden it would be compulsory and it would have occurred infinitely long ago, and the cosmos would still be in that state now.

The Big Bang itself is the surest disproof of the Second Thermodynamics that it is possible to have and yet legions of Nobel Prize winning scientists have failed to notice this elementary fact. If something as logically outrageous as a whole universe emerging from “nothing” can happen how can anyone be so stupid as to claim that the universe will perpetually freeze? (And if a universe could spring out of nothing 14 billion years ago, it must have been able to do so eons before for exactly the same reasons: indeed it must have been able to do so an infinite number times since there is no sufficient reason to forbid it.) Moreover, if there are countless black holes in the universe, relentlessly sucking matter into them, what sane person will seriously suggest that the universe is doomed to reach frozen stasis?

The Second Law of Thermodynamics is yet another statement of “false science” i.e. scientific materialism that refuses to acknowledge the existence of true mind. False science extrapolates to the whole cosmos “good science” that is applicable only to certain regions of space and time when specific conditions apply.

The Will to Actualisation is a revolutionary concept. From this, everything else flows. The Will to Actualisation is a ceaseless longing and yearning, an unstoppable craving and striving. What we call “desire” is the Will to Actualisation in its basic state. Without desire nothing can happen. It is no mistake that the Buddhists conceive of the death of desire as a precondition for attaining nirvana. Schopenhauer has been accused of misunderstanding nirvana for linking it to complete nothingness – to non-existence and the total extinguishing of the will. In fact, it is hard to see how it could possibly be interpreted as anything else. To not desire is to literally not exist, yet such a state is impossible since desire is the arche that can never be created or destroyed.

The Will to Actualisation, this unquenchable desire to attain higher states, has several inevitable consequences. How does it go about attaining these higher states? How does it know it has attained them?

Slowly but surely the Will to Actualisation results in something truly wondrous – the birth of reason. Reason is the basis of planning and order. Ordered states can lead to states of higher order whereas perfectly random, chaotic states will always stay perfectly random and chaotic. Reason (order, planning, logic, the Logos), is something that emerges inexorably from the Will to Actualisation. And the core language of reason is none other than mathematics. The Will to Actualisation was guaranteed to create mathematics as its central tool for imposing order, organisation and form on itself. Without mathematics, the Will to Actualisation could never have become anything. To achieve higher states there must be an ordering and organisation of states, and mathematics is the quintessence of order, organisation and pattern.

But mathematics on its own is insufficient. How can mathematics allow a judgement of what represents a higher state? Is a row of sixes more or less ordered than a column of fives? Is a circle better than an ellipse? How would a mathematical mind “know” that it had achieved something better than before?

Two other factors are necessary:

1) Intuition. A mind must intuitively grasp that one state is higher than another, that it offers more potential, that it is associated with greater power. Intuition is a glimpse of the future. It is an instinctive understanding of what the completed project will look like. It is intuition that offers the scope for incredible short cuts. Intuition, inspiration and enlightenment are similar in conception – they offer a dazzling flash of the telos – the desired end: God fully actualised. No one is closer to Godliness than the most intuitive amongst us.

2) Feeling. Some things make us feel “good” and others “bad”. Some things cause us pleasure and others pain. Some things make us feel we have increased our power, others that we have lost power. It is these emotional judgements that allow us to cut through endless mathematical patterns. Scientists studying facial recognition using computers have discovered that their best computerised attempts can’t come anywhere near the speed and efficiency of humans who can recognise familiar faces instantly.

Computerised facial recognition software has the task of matching a new photograph that someone inputs into the system with one of an enormous number of photographs of people stored in its database. To test for a match, the software has to laboriously measure all sorts of facial distances and angles and skin tones, eye colours, hair patterns and textures etc. One of the reasons why humans are so much better is that they have an emotional response to faces. They might find them attractive or ugly, for instance. If they know the person, recognition is instantaneous. Why? Because we’re hardwired for faces. They are amongst the most significant things in our life. We have to recognise our mother’s face, our father’s, our siblings’, those of our friends, enemies, lovers, strangers etc. We absorb far more information from a person’s face than we do from what they say. People interviewing you for a job pay far more attention to your appearance than to what you say. Your accent and tone of voice are much more important than the content. You could be Einstein himself and yet if you have a broad, ill-educated accent someone may judge you the village idiot. Feeling, not reason, rules such choices.

Computers, as tools that execute endless mathematical instructions but which have absolutely no intuition or feelings, can never match us. To make artificial intelligences smarter than we are, you would have to work out how to instil emotion and intuition into them. You would need to make them desire and care about things. You would need to make them love and hate, to experience pleasure and pain. But if you succeeded in doing that, they would replace us!

Humans are not machines. We are not computers. We have a mathematical processor at our core, and the whole cosmos is mathematical, yet mathematics does not define us. We have a feeling processor too, and an intuition processor – these are what raise us above automata. To put it another way, we have God inside us. We have the Will to Actualisation burning within our hearts. How could a computer distinguish between Beethoven and muzak? It couldn’t. It would analyse the respective music into waves, amplitudes, frequencies etc but it would never experience the music. It would never feel it from the inside.

Scientific materialism is a Cartesian project that treats human beings as automata. But that’s not what we are. We are alive. We feel. We dream. We hope. We aspire. We lust. We love. We long for things. Automata do none of these things. One of the reasons why we can dismiss Abrahamism is that it treats us as creations. We are not. We are eternal. We are the same stuff as the universe in its primordial form. Robots are our creations. They are dead. The reason for that is that they are artificial, containing our limited understanding of the arche rather than naturally reflecting it.

It is impossible for us to program a human-like robot. If we wanted to create realistic androids, we would have to subject them to the only process that can capture the arche – evolution. Schopenhauer said that music is a direct copy of the primordial Will, hence why it affects us so profoundly. But there is something else that is a direct copy of the Will – evolution. What does evolution seek to accomplish? – creatures that will, that desire, that want to convert potential into actualisation.

We are the arche. We are its expression. We are taking it higher and higher, to ever-greater levels of actualisation. The process can end at all only one point – divinity. We are all becoming God. We carry God within us. If you could glimpse your innermost core you would be gazing at God himself. That is why the Abrahamist religions are so disgusting. They try to alienate us from what is holiest in us. They try to estrange us from our own Godliness.

To talk of “life” appearing in the cosmos is totally wrong. The cosmos is intrinsically alive. What we actually mean by “life” is when mind succeeds in animating matter. It took eons before the unconscious cosmic mind was finally able to bind itself to its own creation – matter – in a way that gave it more than just mathematical control of matter (more than just the laws of physics, in other words). It is that binding that is named life. Life is what you get when an individual mind (a soul) has planted itself inside matter, bringing desire, emotion and intuition to a limited segment of the material world. Often, life may be barely expressed, as in a plant, but when you bear in mind that a banana is said to have 30% of its DNA in common with a human, you can begin to understand that life is just a spectrum, of which we are at the higher end and plants the lower.

Artificial intelligence can never be real life because it lacks those crucial elements of desire, emotion and intuition. It lacks the evolutionary expression of the primeval Will. To make artificial life real you would have to give it a soul. Do you know any computer programmer who knows how to code a soul?

Plato divided the soul into three: the reasoning part, the feeling/spirited part and the desiring part. Had he added intuition he would have had a complete description of the Will to Actualisation. The Will to Actualisation begins as pure desire and striving, with an evolving intuitive notion of where it wants to go. It acquires reason, logic and planning via mathematics, then acquires feeling as a means of judging between alternatives.

Nietzsche’s “Will to Power” is effectively identical to the Will to Actualisation. Walter Kaufmann wrote, “Nietzsche was a dialectical monist. His basic force, the will to power, is not only the Dionysian passionate striving, akin to Schopenhauer’s irrational will, but is also Apollonian and possesses an inherent capacity to give itself form.” Here we have all of the right ingredients – Dionysian desire, passion and emotion and Apollonian order, organisation and reason, both driven by the dialectic of becoming, and guided by an intuitive teleology of increasing power.

The simplest way to think of the cosmos is as a dialectical, evolutionary process for converting potential into actuality. All you need to create a universe is mental, dimensionless energy infused with the Will to Actualisation. From that, everything else follows. The system pulls itself up by its own bootstraps. It creates itself and perfects itself. Science treats energy as some sterile, mindless, neutral substance, but it is no such thing. Energy is alive. Not in the sense in which we understand it, but as its indispensable precursor. It is only because energy is evolving, releasing more and more of its potential dialectically, that life evolved. The quality of energy is always dialectically improving.

Marxists argued that the laws that govern matter are not mechanistic but dialectical (hence the description of Marxists as dialectical materialists). Although no one ever says so, this is a much better way of viewing science than traditional mechanistic scientific materialism. Marxists do not agree with scientific materialists that only matter exists. Rather, they say that mind is the highest product of matter, and that matter is dialectically trying to generate more and more mind. Dialectical materialism asserts that one of the fundamental laws of existence is that quantity (matter) is dialectically transformed into quality (mind). Dialectical materialism is thus extremely closely related to alchemy: transforming base matter into the “gold” of the highest spirit.

Although Marx believed he was inverting Hegel’s philosophy, he was actually much closer to Hegel than he imagined. Hegel’s position was idealistic rather than materialistic i.e. mind precedes matter; matter is a product of mind rather than mind being a product of matter. The Big Bang can be explained in Hegelian terms (matter emerges from mind) but not in Marxist terms (matter comes from nothing at all). Of course, neither Hegel nor Marx had ever heard of the term “Big Bang” but there can be no doubt that Big Bang theory is a triumphant vindication and indeed almost proof of the correctness of Hegel’s philosophy.

For Hegel, mind creates matter and then, through material existence (the world of space and time), is able to attain self-consciousness and ultimately reach its highest state – Absolute Knowledge and Absolute Mind. Matter is the necessary state of alienation that mind must go through on its journey to its Omega Point. It is dialectically imperative that mind should create matter. But Marx’s position effectively becomes the same as Hegel’s once the material world exists. Marx asserts that matter is dialectically trying to reach its highest state – mind, and Hegel asserts that mind is dialectically trying to attain its highest state through matter. Either way, both positions maintain that the highest expression of mind is the dialectical culmination of existence. Hence the difference at this level becomes a matter of semantics.

Hegel and Marx are both advocates of the transformation, the alchemical transmutation, of quantity into quality, the impure into the pure, the unfashioned into the sculpted, potential into actuality, the lowest quality into the highest. Any view of human beings should reflect this same scope for our transformation into higher states and, at last, into none other than God, the Omega Point of the dialectic. Marxist dialectical science is a much better way of thinking about Darwinian evolution than traditional mechanistic science. It is impossible to conceive of how any mechanistic processes could lead to life, mind and consciousness. How can free will be mechanistic?

But the concept of matter striving to generate mind in a dialectical rather than mechanistic manner provides a more productive perspective. Mechanistic processes are anti-mind; dialectical processes are pro-mind.

Energy, fundamentally, is Will. How could it be otherwise? Nothing would happen without will. If you had no will you wouldn’t get out of bed. A computer has no will. It has no urge to switch itself on. Only Will drives things forward and makes things happen. Most of the time it operates unconsciously, following the path of least resistance – the laws of science – and can often seem to be inert and inanimate (like the computer) but eventually it can express itself more meaningfully. It can attain the condition of free will. We, humanity, already display this divine quality, although precious few of us use it properly. Nevertheless, we are the living proof that energy – which can be neither created nor destroyed – can transform itself into higher states. Energy can make itself conscious. Consciousness is the highest quality of energy. Maximum consciousness is God.

We human beings are still in thrall to enormous unconscious forces, but when we attain gnosis, we will have achieved the Omega Point of energy’s journey from potential to actualisation. Energy is not “stuff” – it is self-transformative will. There is only one thing capable of learning and improving itself – mind. Therefore, energy, when properly understood, is mind. Just as we have a will to do things, so does pure mind. It is will that powers the mind to higher and higher states. We call this process the dialectic. It is a learning process that gains knowledge via the path of contradiction.

Thesis, antithesis and synthesis – over and over again, attaining higher and higher states. That is how you go from maximum potential to maximum actualisation. There is no other way. Mechanistic processes cannot lead you anywhere. No scientist has ever understood the true nature of energy – that it is actually wilful mind. When you grasp that, you have grasped the fundamental nature of existence.
__________

The Three Universes II:

When all’s said and done, it’s remarkably easy to analyse the cosmos we see around us. There are only three ways by which it could have reached its present state, two of which are concerned with God, and the third of which avoids God, as we’ve just described. It’s worthwhile going through them again, from a slightly different angle. The cosmos was created by an external, eternal, perfect being (God). This is the Abrahamist view. We have a perfect starting point – God – and then we go downhill from then on because God’s creation is less perfect than he is. It’s odd that people should subscribe to this stance of cosmic anti-evolution. And why would God himself want to create imperfection when he could make do with his perfect self?

God’s “love” becomes a love of imperfection rather than of perfection. He loves us because we are necessarily inferior to him. In other words, this isn’t love at all, but domination and bullying. Read the Abrahamist texts – they are all about a tyrant dictating to abject slaves, and the slaves are supposed to put up with it because God says so. The Catholic Catechism asks, “Why did God make me?” and the answer is “To love, serve and obey him.” That sums up the situation perfectly – the most one-sided contract you could over get. It’s the creed of the master, and no self-respecting person could ever endure such an unequal relationship.

Just as odd as Abrahamism is scientific materialism. This asserts that the cosmos sprang out of nothing 14 billion years ago in a huge burst of energy, and the useful energy has been running down ever since and will eventually reach a zero state where the cosmos will have suffered “heat death” and be frozen forever, incapable of doing a single thing. You simply couldn’t get a more grim, nihilistic, pointless and purposeless vision of existence than this. Along the way, according to this view, atoms of matter jostle with each other and interact in various ways. Amidst all of the random jostlings, life, mind and consciousness emerge for no apparent reason and via a completely unknown mechanism (voodoo perhaps!). However, these serve no purpose and are just curious phenomena, nothing else. Like the cosmos itself, we will perish and the material atoms of which we are composed will suffer heat death along with everything else.

If you don’t believe in the perfect Creator fashioning the imperfect cosmos out of nothing, and you don’t believe in the cosmos springing out of nothing without the help of any Creator and then just randomly running down its energy in a series of utterly pointless and mindless interactions then you are left with the truth: the cosmos is not created. It has always existed and will always exist. It can never not exist. It goes through great cyclic Ages as it explores every conceivable possibility. The basic stuff of existence is wilful, purposeful energy – mind/spirit (Geist to use Hegel’s word) – that strives to turn all possibilities into actualities. It does so eternally. When it has exhausted one Age of all of its possibilities, it commits “divine suicide” and begins again. This cosmic adventure can never end.

A number of perceptive individuals have written to us to point out that there’s something horrific about this stance since it amounts, in the final analysis, to a type of eternal recurrence, resembling the endless task of Sisyphus pushing the boulder up the hill only to see it always fall.

Eternal Recurrence comes in several varieties. In the Groundhog Day version, for example, you are free to do whatever you like within a restricted, repeating scenario. In the Sisyphean version, the scenario repeats and the actions you perform repeat, but each repetition is always slightly different from the one before – you push the boulder up the hill differently; you come back down the hill differently. In the strictest interpretation of Nietzsche’s version of eternal recurrence, your life is repeated identically an infinite number of times.

In terms of cosmic eternal recurrence, the same scenario of maximum potential being converted to maximum actualisation happens an infinite number of times, but the events experienced are different every time round, meaning that there is infinite variety within a repeating scenario i.e. the scenario eternally recurs, not the events within the scenario, which are always different. In an infinite system with infinite possibilities, there can never be identical repetition of the Nietzschean kind, hence the future remains completely undetermined. The general pattern it will take is nevertheless fully known, and is inescapable.

The cosmos cannot do anything else. There are no ways out in an infinite system. If God is eternal, what keeps him excited and stimulated after ten zillion trillion years? Hasn’t he seen and done everything? Isn’t he bored to death, so to speak? He experiences nothing but constant repetition. Or what about the cosmic heat death? – a universe frozen for eternity. What’s good about that? The universe cannot do anything other than go from potential to the perfection of complete actualisation, and then start again. It cannot stand still.

It cannot endure eternal perfection because it encounters the ultimate cosmic stumbling block – boredom. Boredom is, arguably, the most important aspect of existence, the factor that subverts perfection itself. How can any mind stave off boredom when it has resolved every problem? You start to realise something incredible about the universe. It does strange things and seems to operate in a baffling and enigmatic way precisely in order to defeat boredom.

The Hindu concept of Maya – illusion – is invaluable. If you were God and had experienced perfection for eons, and were now utterly bored by yet another day of glorious flawlessness, wouldn’t you create a force whose function was to attempt to deceive you, to puzzle you… to entertain you? One way or another, God allows evil to exist, he allows confusion, pain, suffering and bewilderment to exist because if none of these things existed, life would not be endurable. The highest wisdom is this – boredom trumps morality. In an infinite system – a system that literally cannot end – the issue of how to escape boredom becomes paramount. Indeed it is the only issue. The universe that cycles endlessly from potential to actualisation, reaching an Omega Point of perfection and then starting again is the optimal solution to counteracting boredom in eternity. There is no alternative, like it or not.

Isn’t it strange that in a mortal system, fear of death is paramount, but in an immortal system, fear of deathlessness replaces it? How will you cope with an existence that can never end no matter what you do? You are like Bill Murray’s character in Groundhog Day when it seemed that he was trapped forever in a loop; not even killing himself offered release. But looking at it another way, in this system you get to experience perfection an infinite number of times, and isn’t that the most desirable outcome infinity can confer?

What do you fear most? Death or deathlessness? There’s no inbetween. Would you prefer eternal oblivion or the impossibility of oblivion? Death takes your life against your will. Deathlessness prevents you ever exiting life even if you want to. “You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave,” as the Eagles put it in Hotel California.

You see, we are fully jacked in to the zero-infinity system. If we are mortal, our lives are zero compared with infinity, hence what’s the point? If we are immortal, we are the children of infinity and zero can never be truly ours. Yet zero is absolutely ours because only zero – dimensionlessness – is outside space and time, outside mortality. No matter what, we can never escape from zero and infinity. They define us, just as they define everything. Zero and infinity set the bounds for dimensionality and mortality, but they themselves are outside dimensionality and mortality.

Consider the Abrahamic concepts of heaven and hell. Catholics talk about gazing upon the Beatific Vision in Paradise. Yet how long could you gaze upon anything? Doesn’t a time come when it bores you to tears? Imagine an eternity spent staring at the Mona Lisa. How long would it be before it became nauseating to you, the most unbearable thing you could ever conceive? You would give anything not to have to look at it one second longer.

As for hell, imagine you had been tortured in every conceivable way for a trillion years. But you still have an infinite sentence left. You always have an infinite sentence left no matter how much times elapses. There are no new torments for the demons to devise for you. They’ve exhausted all of their ideas. So, would there come a time when you begged your torturers to find a new way to torture you because you were so bored with all of the other tortures that had been done to you umpteen times before? You realise that even the demons are bored to tears.

You are bored, and your demons are bored. The Devil is bored. And this must continue forever. Even worse, you are totally desensitised to pain. You can’t feel anything anymore. None of the tortures cause you any physical distress at all now. Once you’ve been burned for a million years, you no longer feel the flames. In fact you crave the days when you once screamed out, because at least you felt something. Now you are perpetually numb. And exactly the same is true in heaven. All pleasures, all delights, have become mind-numbingly tedious. God is even more bored than the Devil.

Heaven and hell, God and Satan have merged into one. They are the collective expression of Absolute Boredom!!! Pleasure and pain have lost all meaning. The souls in heaven crave the tortures of hell just so that they can have a new experience. They start to wonder whether they are the ones in hell and if God was Satan all along to have inflicted so much despair on them. Ironic, isn’t it? As soon as you truly contemplate living forever you realise that you will have to confront not the horror of dying, but the horror of not dying! And with crystal clarity all of the puzzles of existence are solved.

Life is spectacularly mysterious for the simple reason that it has to be in order to stave off boredom. WE, all of us, have created this system. We don’t remember, and that’s the whole point. We devised a system that would save us from eternal tedium. We created Maya to spin illusions and puzzles for us so that we could avoid learning the truth too quickly.

The Will to Actualisation suffers from a critical design flaw. It cannot stop. Not ever. It always desires and that desire can never be quenched. Not even perfection tames it. Desire has a monstrous flipside – boredom. When desires are not being fulfilled, boredom emerges, and desire then craves something to fill the vacuum.

Boredom is the driver that keeps whipping desire along. If you are not in a state of desire then you are in a state of boredom, which can only be cured by new desires. One way or another, the system keeps moving forward. There is no stop button. Schopenhauer was the philosopher who took this melancholy realisation to its most extreme extent and declared existence inherently evil. Happiness and satisfaction are impossible, he said. When you achieve any ambition it gives you but momentary pleasure. Almost instantly, you set new goals and have to start all over again. If you can’t think of a new objective, you succumb to boredom and that will then force you to new activity. There’s no way out. No priests, rabbis and imams ever talk about these most fundamental questions. Why not? A) They don’t understand them and B) It would ruin their infantile understanding of the world.

According to Abrahamists, you get one brief mortal life which decides your fate for a subsequent immortal life in heaven or hell (what’s remotely fair and just about that? – about the actions you perform in three score years and ten settling your eternal future, with no right of appeal?). No Abrahamist ever considers what you will be thinking and feeling once you have experienced heaven or hell for a zillion trillion years and still have eternity stretching before you. No Abrahamist ever considers one of the defining characteristics of the human mind or indeed of any conscious mind – the certainty of being bored by repetition and the craving for novelty.

Remember, to become God you must ponder the questions that God has to confront, the greatest of which is how to live with infinity. To learn to affirm it and love it. When you say YES to life, you are saying yes to infinity, and to everything that implies.

As usual, Nietzsche grasped these issues better than any theologian: ‘What if a demon crept after you one day or night in your loneliest solitude and said to you: “This life, as you live it now and have lived it, you will have to live again and again, times without number; and there will be nothing new in it, but every pain and every joy and every thought and sigh and all the unspeakably small and great in your life must return to you, and everything in the same series and sequence – and in the same way this spider and this moonlight among the trees, and in the same way this moment and I myself. The eternal hourglass of existence will be turned again and again – and you with it, you dust of dust!” – Would you not throw yourself down and gnash your teeth and curse the demon who thus spoke? Or have you experienced a tremendous moment in which you would have answered him: “You are a god and never did I hear anything more divine!” If this thought gained power over you it would, as you are now, transform and perhaps crush you; the question in all and everything: “do you want this again and again, times without number?” would lie as the heaviest burden upon all of your actions.

Or how well disposed towards yourself and towards life would you have to become to have no greater desire than this for the ultimate eternal sanction and seal?’

The cyclical cosmos, reincarnating itself eternally in order to go from absolute potential to absolute perfection an infinite number of times is the ONLY rational answer of how to cope with deathlessness. And once you have got used to the idea then, like Nietzsche’s Superman, you will find yourself affirming this reality and declaring this the most divine news possible. You will achieve perfection not just once but an infinite number of times – and if that’s not the definition of a perfect existence then what is?

******

A mind desires. It needs a way to know if it is getting closer or further from what it desires and it uses pleasure and pain, the basis of emotion. To plan, it needs logic and reason. Mathematics is the element that underlies logic and reason. Mathematics is also the ground of law, order, organisation and pattern. Hence desire necessarily generates both emotion and reason. Music can be thought of as both reason and emotion. Mathematics provides the rational form while the content conveys the emotion. Without the form, the content could not exist.

Fundamentally, as Pythagoras perceived, we belong to a cosmos filled with music, for which one day we will have the ears. We will listen to the cosmic orchestra playing the sublime music of the spheres, and nothing will ever have sounded better. Music to make you cry, music to make you die.
__________

4/10

Religion, judged by the consequences it has had for humanity, is more like the work of the Devil than of God. It has generated legions of zombies, so brainwashed they will kill people in the name of their supposedly merciful, peaceful, loving, forgiving, compassionate God. It’s time to face the grimmest of facts: religion is evil. Or, rather, the religions that have assumed dominance in the world are evil. They succeeded precisely because they are evil. They are Satan’s work, his instruments for imposing his will on humanity. Isn’t that the most credible interpretation of the religious history of the world? Is Jerusalem the city of God or the capital of hell?

Religion is a system of mind control. It’s time to reclaim it and make it what it was intended to be – humanity’s greatest gift. The main religions make no sense. Frankly, they are absurd. That could perhaps be overlooked if they had succeeded in making the world a better place, a paradise. But they haven’t even though they’ve had thousands of years to do so. They claim to teach love, peace and being generous and helpful towards others, so where is the New Eden? Where is the Golden Age? Where are justice, peace and prosperity for all? And since these religions haven’t delivered, why haven’t they been replaced by something more effective? Why do people cling to failure?

This is a wicked world filled with war, greed and intolerance. Fanatical suicide bombers murder innocents in the name of their God. Surely they mean Satan. Don’t we detect the smell of sulphur emanating from these people?

The main religions serve only one purpose: to control your behaviour and make you their slave. They try to dictate to you every second of the day with their inflexible dogmas, commandments and rules. They have proved immensely valuable to the powerful, rich and corrupt. The mainstream religions and the Old World Order work hand in hand to make our lives miserable. Isn’t it time we wised up? If the main religions aren’t benefiting us, isn’t it time to change them to ones that do?

The pagans of ancient Greece and Rome fought political but never religious wars. They didn’t wage jihads and crusades. They didn’t excommunicate people and burn them at the stake for religious transgressions. They didn’t martyr themselves in the name of Zeus and Jupiter. The only ancient nation that engaged in explicit holy war was (surprise, surprise) Israel. The Hebrews exterminated the Canaanites in the name of their God. They even claimed that their God accompanied them into battle in the Ark of the Covenant. So much for love and peace.

The Greeks, Egyptians and Romans had many gods. When they conquered other countries, they frequently absorbed the gods of the vanquished into their own pantheon. In religious terms, they were for the most part extremely tolerant and open-minded. Their pagan religions offered great freedom, inspiration, ecstatic moments and a variety of routes to exploring and experiencing the divine. There were no fierce, bearded prophets, no holy scriptures claiming to be the true word of God, no Inquisitions to eradicate heretics. These pagan religions understood that humans are diverse, while the Abrahamic religions demand slavish conformity.

The God of Abrahamism is usually pictured as an old and bearded man living in the sky, suitably invisible in normal circumstances, constantly staring into your mind and ready to send you to hell if you violate his rules. Of course, all the followers of other religions go straight to hell, yet although he sends these people to a place of eternal suffering, he still loves YOU. This perfect, universal God apparently has a favourite race: his “Chosen People”. Why? Did he create only a small percentage of the world’s population? If not, why does he reject the rest of the human race? And if this perfect, all-powerful being who created us didn’t want us to commit “sins”, then we wouldn’t be able to, would we? So clearly, he wants us to sin so that he can then punish us for our transgressions. He gets off on it. He’s a sadist, a torturer.

It’s also strange that his holy texts, given to us in his own, infallible words (supposedly), are so badly written, so hard to understand, so heavily coded and, even worse, so full of inconsistencies and illogicalities that they are quite beyond belief. Come on, a perfect God should be able to articulate clearly what he wants from us, shouldn’t he?

If this God is perfect, why is he so jealous, cruel and violent (the Old Testament reads like the adventures of a psychopath – read it for yourself and you’ll be appalled)? Does he really desire slavish worship by dumb, bowing humans eternally reciting holy texts like mindless parrots? Most of us would be bored to tears by constantly hearing the same uninspiring prayers. Why does God find it so exciting?

What about so-called tolerance? Christianity wasn’t spread by love, but by fire and sword. Muslims are ordered to kill Christians and Jews. Jews think God chose them, though he seems to disagree judging by millennia of expulsions, pogroms and persecutions, culminating in the Holocaust!

So, one question can’t be avoided. Isn’t “God” an impostor? Isn’t he the Father of Lies who has pulled off the most daring impersonation in history?

Ladies and gentlemen, let us introduce you to Satan, the great deceiver. Who else could be behind the millennia of carnage carried out in the name of “God”? As soon as you understand that it was Satan all along, everything becomes crystal clear. The Gnostics saw the truth millennia ago. Why has everyone else been so slow on the uptake?

Satan loves conflict, war, intolerance, hunger, pain, suffering and everything else we have had inflicted on us by religious fanatics. That’s the God of the Christians, Jews and Muslims for you! The Eastern religions’ Devil is the toxic doctrine of karma that gave birth to the abominable Hindu caste system and the idea that we are being punished for sins committed in previous existences. Now do you understand why the world is so wicked, so full of suffering and misery? Humanity has been worshipping the wrong guy. The God most people pray to is the Devil.

It’s time we left behind these monstrous, false religions of Satan. Let’s turn to a religion of reason, hope and freedom that celebrates the True God, not Satan. Let’s turn to Illuminism: the religion of light, the religion of enlightenment. What is the purpose of religion? It is to provide answers to the profoundest questions such as: What is the meaning of life? Who created the world? Why does evil exist?

No one needs temples, churches, priests and rabbis for any of that.
__________

Islam – the Dark Ages:

“In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.” Would you stone a couple of young lovers to death? Could there ever be any legitimate religious reason for killing lovers who have done no harm to anyone? No? Muslims think differently. In video footage that shocked the world www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKWrTRw8fSE a large crowd of Afghani Muslims was seen stoning a young woman standing in the middle of her own grave, dressed in a blue burqa so that none of her features could be seen. When she attempted to crawl out of the hole dug for her, she was finished off with gunshots. Her male lover was then brought out and the vicious mob quickly finished him off with their stones. Is Islam a religion or a psychosis? How can anyone who kills lovers say that they believe in a most merciful God? More like the Devil. Islam is a time machine for taking badly educated people 1400 years into the past where they can live like primitive tribes people, cut off from modernity. No one does this to Muslims. They do it to themselves.

The Jewish religion is much older than Islam, but the Jews have mostly stayed in touch with modernity. In fact, they have often been the vanguard of new thinking. There are precious few Jews in comparison with the number of Muslims and yet the Jews have had an almost infinitely greater impact on cultural and intellectual life than the Muslims. Why? Because they have respected education. The Koran, on the other hand, is a book of anti-education.

Here is some drivel by an extremist Islamic Jihadist group called The Truth Army.

Bringing you Truth videos from all over the world to enlighten the masses, fight against ignorance, and destroy the NWO. 9/11 was a satanic Illuminati freemasonic ritual to usher in the NWO, which is comprised of 2 parts:

1. War against Islamic Sharia being implemented as a political system.

2. War against freedom, sovereignty, and prosperity of all of humanity.

The satanic Illuminati dominate several aspects including banking, political, military, media, and economic spheres of influence worldwide.

They are currently destroying the Western world and finalizing the shift of economic power over to the East, specifically China. China is already a model NWO state due to the atheistic nature of the government and totalitarian control of the people.

The long-term goal for the world is massive population reduction through wars, famines, disease, sterilization, abortion, and other means to destroy humanity which the dark Illuminati do in order to please their master, Satan / Shaytan / the Devil. They wish to hasten on the arrival of their awaited one, the Antichrist / False Messiah / The Deceiver, because in their corrupted belief system they believe that they will become supreme and immortal beings by doing this great evil in the world.

They are deceived, and are the worst of mankind. They will have their punishment in the Next Life, and will have no refuge from The Creator of the worlds. The only way to achieve victory against the lies, death, and corruption of the satanic Illuminati is through Truth, Life, and Justice.

The masses of humanity must be educated as to who the true enemy is. We must know ourselves as well as the enemy so that we may effectively fight and destroy the NWO Antichrist system. The time has come to unite all of humanity against the forces of darkness to destroy them if we wish to ensure our own survival.

Educate each other
Unite on all levels
Stand up for the world and future generations

There are more than enough resources in the world for everyone and much more. The death mentality of the Illuminati promotes scarcity, ignorance, and wars, while the righteous people of the world promote wealth, knowledge, wisdom, peace, science, and prosperity.

The Victory of the Righteous Believers is Written.

The God-fearing people of the world shall achieve Success in this life and The Next.

All Power is with God, The Creator of all the worlds.
All Praise is due to Allah.
Peace to the Truthful Ones.
Peace to The Truth Army.

******

Note how this almost exactly matches the rhetoric and analysis of the anarcho-capitalist “Truthers”, and how it inverts the truth in virtually every conceivable way. The Truth Army want to impose Sharia Law on everyone and “unite” the planet under the totalitarian, brainwashed ideology of Islamic Fundamentalism. An Islamic world would be even worse than the present world controlled by the OWO. In fact, it’s hard to conceive of an Islamic-ruled world as being in any way distinguishable from hell.

Muslims don’t want a New World Order for the simple reason that they seek to drag humanity back to the ignorance and savagery of the deserts of Arabia of 1400 years ago. The explicit agenda of Jihadists is to implement, at the point of the sword, gun, improvised explosive device and bomb-belt, global Sharia Law, kill all infidels, apostates, atheists, agnostics, skeptics, freethinkers, blasphemers, homosexuals, heretics, and stone to death any young lovers who have flouted the wishes of their extremist families.

It’s actually pointless to attempt to engage in any rational debate with these people. They are brainwashed beyond any hope of redemption. They will never progress. The problem is how to live in peaceful co-existence with them when they are committed to violently imposing Islam on the rest of the world, just as their Prophet was a savage man steeped in blood who waged savage war against all non- Mohammedans.

This is one of the greatest dilemmas imaginable. Every country in Europe has seen the rise of right-wing parties and the reason is always the same – they want to prevent illiberal Muslims from backward countries coming to Europe and infecting Europe with their ignorance and fanaticism. This is not a racial issue, but purely religious and cultural. Hindus have had no difficulties in integrating in European countries. Hindus who come to Europe are typically smart, liberal, open-minded, tolerant, and happy to befriend and mix with the Europeans. Muslims, on the other hand, refuse to integrate. The only reason they come to Europe is to partake of the higher standard of living. They actively hate Europeans and openly say that all Europeans will go to hell unless they convert to Islam.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s formula for dealing with those who insist on placing their particular will over the General Will was that they must be “forced to be free”. Anyone who aspires to govern a country must be able to take hard decisions. As a tolerant, rational person, how would you deal with the intolerant and the irrational, those who wave an extremist book in your face which, they say, they are commanded to obey on pain of death?

Muslims, Orthodox Jews, Christian Fundamentalists, anarcho-capitalists and the dynastic elites such as the Rothschilds would never accept any of the Rebooting Laws. They would fight to the death to prevent them being implemented. They are stuck in the past.

No healthy State would permit babies to be attacked and genitally mutilated. If an adult wants to be circumcised, that’s his business, but a baby gives no consent, hence must be defended by the law of the land from being circumcised merely to gratify the beliefs of others. A baby has absolute human rights, and foremost amongst those is the right not to be made a human sacrifice in order to satisfy “God” (i.e. Abraham had no right to take his son’s life no matter who ordered him to do so), nor to be genitally mutilated or physically attacked in any way for the sake of “God”.

In the Bible, it is clear that “God” decrees that no human being has any rights whatever. He allegedly exterminated 99.999% of the human race in the Great Flood. When the Nazis killed six million Jews, they were indicted for waging aggressive war, for war crimes and crimes against humanity. When God almost wiped out humanity, not a single indictment was brought against him. Why not? If “God” contravenes the Declaration of Human Rights, shouldn’t he be put on trial just as the Nazis were? This is a fundamental issue because it relates directly to how religious parents treat their children.

All religious parents think that God has an absolute right to kill anyone, no questions asked. Why? Because he is the “Creator”. These same parents think they have the absolute right to kill and mutilate their children, just as if they were God, because, in relation to their children, they are the Creators. So, in Pakistan and many other Islamic countries, “honour” killings are rife. Anyone (usually teenage girls) who shames their family by having an affair, a romance, not agreeing to a forced marriage, marrying someone inappropriate etc, forfeits their life and is murdered, usually by their father, brother or uncle.

Jewish and Muslim parents automatically subject their baby sons to genital mutilation. Religious parents think they have the unquestionable right to brainwash their children into believing the same things that they do. Well, do they have such a right? Is it consistent with human rights? Isn’t it time all religions were placed on trial and explicitly challenged under human rights legislation? Isn’t it time monarchs were put on trial to determine whether they have any right to refer to human beings as their “subjects”?

We live in an absurd world where contradictory laws are allowed to co-exist. Either we have a constitution and a rule of law or we don’t. If we do then no one can be exempt, and that includes religions and monarchs. “God” himself is not above the law. If there is a commandment saying, “Thou shalt not kill”, why isn’t “God” subject to it, especially since he claims to be loving, forgiving, merciful, peace loving, and compassionate? If “God” has the right to kill human beings no questions asked then we are his worthless, disposable slaves and he is a tyrant. If we are not slaves then he has no right to dispense with our lives as he sees fit.
__________

The Black Holocaust:

What is the greatest crime in human history? It concerns precisely this issue of slavery versus absolute human rights.

A book called The Black Holocaust for Beginners by S. E. Anderson estimates that 100 million Africans died as a direct result of the slave trade and slavery. Who were the slave traders? They were Christians and Muslims (and Jews supported slavery too).

Here are some of the comments posted on Amazon about this book.

The information was priceless. It hurt my soul and brought me to tears to know that people who claim to follow God walk so casually in the footsteps of Satan. The cruelty inflicted on innocent men, women and children was incredible. It speaks volumes about the spiritual depravity of the European and Arabian people that they could allow and participate in such atrocities. Our children and children all over the earth must read this book so that they will know, so that they will never forget, and so the human family will never allow this to occur ever again.

Anderson and Holley rightly tackle a topic that deserves study. However, they de-emphasize the well-developed Islamic slave trade that kidnapped more than 11 million Black Africans from their homes between 700 to 1900. This slave trade began centuries before the Atlantic trade and continued for centuries after.

Islamic scripture fully embraces the institution of human slavery. Mohammed left many instructions to slave owners. This express endorsement of human slavery by Mohammed accounts for the fact that human slavery was not abolished in Saudi Arabia until 1964 and not until 1968 in Kuwait. Islamic slavery was no less brutal than the Atlantic variety. Male slaves were routinely castrated and forced into military service. Female slaves become sexual servants whose children were not their own.

The systematic exploitation, enslavement and extermination of Africans in the Western Hemisphere dates from the start of the European slave trade around 1500 BCE to the conclusion of the American Civil War in 1865. The Black Holocaust killed millions of African human beings and is (because of the social prejudice and dehumanisation necessary to justify slavery) the most under-reported event in western history. The Black Holocaust for Beginners is an ideal introduction to this incredible human chronicle of suffering and is a “must” for every school and community library black studies and American history collection.

I’ve been reading everything “black” I could get my hands on since I started my awakening. I stumbled upon the Holocaust book in a small bookstore in Albuquerque, NM and had it read by that afternoon; I couldn’t put it down. I was so impacted upon by the pictures, particularly of Sister Translator hanging from her tongue because she could speak to many and because she dared to strike a white man. It was so very interesting to learn about the Arab slave trade, especially the current state of affairs regarding slavery in Mauritania and the Sudan. Of great interest to me was the numbers Mr. Anderson cites. My husband, who is also a Black activist, has said for year he felt there were 100-150 million involved; it’s easy to see there were really more than that. I applaud Mr. Anderson’s bravery in writing a book about things no one wants to hear. I was moved to tears. Thank you, Mr. Anderson and may the Lord of your Fathers richly bless your life for your contribution to the cause.

We hear endlessly about the Jewish Holocaust, and almost never about the Black Holocaust. Why not? Cui bono? The horrific treatment to which Africans were subjected was a direct consequence of Judaeo-Christian and Islamic beliefs. Africans were heathen infidels, hence destined for hell, hence fully deserving of whatever they got. If God had wanted them to be spared he would have made them People of the Book. Because he didn’t, he clearly wanted them to be slaves, and he placed zero value on their lives. Thus goes the logic of those who believe in a Satanic “God” who thinks nothing of exterminating the Canaanites, drowning the world and subjecting everyone to Original Sin, which means that they then merit eternal hellfire.

The Jewish Holocaust may be viewed in a similar light. Since Christianity asserts that all Jews are going to hell for rejecting Christ, why would there be anything wrong with stuffing them in death camps? They were the damned, just as the Africans were before them. At the Nuremberg Trials, Goering’s defence should have been that Christianity condemns all Jews to hell. All of the Christian prosecutors should have been asked on oath to say whether or not that they agreed that all Jews were hell-bound. If they did (as they would have to if they claimed to be Christian) then on what grounds were they condemning the Nazis for creating hell on earth for the Jews?

The Nazis were merely hastening God’s inevitable judgement. In a world of human rights, there would be no holocausts. Abrahamic religion creates holocausts. What do you expect from a religion that reveres a patriarch prepared to kill his own son in a holocaust? Abrahamism is a religion of murder, mutilation, brainwashing and slavery. It is completely unacceptable in any civilised world.

African Americans provide a crucial test of justice. Because of their history, they have never had easy access to capital in a society based on capital. They have been the victims of racial discrimination for centuries. They have typically been stuck in ghettos and given a poor education. Sport and entertainment have allowed a few to escape but for most there’s no way out. They have never been part of the elite. They have never benefited from privilege. They are not part of the magic circle. All of this gives them moral authority and makes them one of the logical groups to lead the New World Order.
__________

The Sacrifice:

The defining motif of the Abrahamic religions is that the Abrahamic “God” ordered Abraham to perform human sacrifice on his own son, and Abraham agreed. Abrahamist apologists try to explain this away by saying that God intended no harm to the boy. So, let’s test that hypothesis. Imagine the scene. Abraham heroically says to God, “I will never kill my son for you or anyone else. It’s an utterly monstrous and immoral suggestion. One would think you were the Devil rather than God to be able to give such a vile and evil order.”

Are we expected to believe that God would say, “No problem, Abe. I had no intention of letting your son die anyway, and I agree with you about the Devil thing. It was just a test. No biggie.” To which Abraham replies, “Thank God for that, if you’ll pardon the expression. I mean if I had agreed to kill my own son, I’d be a nut, wouldn’t I? And you’d be a nut for asking me to do it. We’d both be psychopaths, wouldn’t we? We’d be evil monsters. You’d be the Devil and I’d be the servant of evil. Obviously, you wanted to make sure that I would never be so deranged as to do something beyond depravity just because you ordered it, right?”

(The biggest tragedy in human history is that Abraham didn’t say this! Think of all the trouble we would have been spared.) God says, “Em, er….I guess so.” Abraham says, “So, what you’re really saying is that I needn’t slavishly obey you and I should exercise my own judgment at all times. I should be free to make up my own mind rather than doing what you say all the time. Right?” God says, “Uh, um, yes, well, I suppose so.” Abraham says, “What a great God you are. I don’t need to do everything you tell me. You’re never going to punish me. I love you. You’re the best. You have truly given me a Paradise to live in.” You think that’s how it would have gone down? Or how about what really would have happened?

God, with fire and brimstone pouring from every orifice, screams, “You dare to defy the Lord thy God?!!!! You have one instant to do what I ordered. If you don’t, I will kill you and your son this second and punish your souls in hell for eternity.” In other words, the story of Abraham is the story of divine Terrorism, with Jehovah the cosmic Terrorist. If Abraham had not been willing to obey orders, he would certainly have been killed, and his son too. His choice was simple – agree to kill his son or suffer eternal hellfire. What choice is that? What “God” forces someone to make such a choice? – only a Satanic God.

It is impossible to excuse Jehovah’s behaviour and his horrific order. To realise that you simply have to ask yourself what Jehovah would have done if Abraham had said no. Abrahamists have fled from that question because they know the answer. The story of Abraham is a very simple one. Abraham’s “God” says, “Obey me or die.” Abraham is allowed to live only if he is prepared to perform the ultimate crime of slaughtering his own child. Any other response would have resulted in his death and his being sentenced to eternal hell. So, what would you do?

What was it the Nazis said in their defence? “We were only obeying orders. If we didn’t we would be killed.” Isn’t that Abraham’s excuse too? We condemn the Nazis as monsters, yet half the world reveres Abraham and thinks he is a mouthpiece of God. How fucked is that? Abrahamism is nothing but the rule of Terror. In Abrahamism, a Terrorist deity demands absolute obedience. What reason do we have or not naming that deity Satan? How could he be any other? There is no conceivable Abrahamic defence. They are Devil worshippers, pure and simple. No good God would ever order anyone to make a human sacrifice of his son.

This “God” should be resisted, not worshipped. He is a monster, a deranged psychopath, the essence of Universal Terror. He does not ask you to worship him, he orders it. If you don’t do so, he kills you. If you do what he says, he promises you heaven, if you don’t, he vows to send you to hell. Where is the morality, the love, the compassion, the mercy, the forgiveness? They don’t exist. Abrahamism is basic Pavlovian conditioning based on punishment and reward.

Jehovah’s equation is the starkest and most brutal imaginable – obey or perish. And how does that differ from what Satan would say? In what way is it possible to distinguish Jehovah from Satan? In the Islamic version of the tale, it is Ishmael not Isaac who is to be sacrificed. Incredibly, the Muslims relate that Shaytan three times pleaded with Abraham to spare Ishmael’s life and three times Abraham violently drove him away by throwing stones at him. This event is “celebrated” every year at the Islamic Hajj.

Obviously, Shaytan didn’t go up to Abraham and say, “Hi, Abe, pleased to meet you – I’m Shaytan, the Prince of Darkness, the cosmic force of absolute evil.” So, Abraham didn’t KNOW it was Shaytan. He simply made that interpretation because a stranger was asking him to do the precise opposite of what Allah was commanding him to – to spare his son’s life rather than kill him! In fact, as the Father of Lies, wouldn’t Shaytan be far more likely to call himself something else? – Allah, for example! (The Satanic Verses controversy was all about Shaytan passing himself off as the Angel Gabriel in order to deceive Mohammed, so why couldn’t he go one better and pass himself off as God? – the ultimate deception.)

So, what we have is someone calling himself Allah demanding human sacrifice, and a stranger pleading with Abraham not to do it. Surely only a sick mind would side with “Allah” against the stranger. Abraham was unquestionably psychotic, with a lust for blood. He was more than happy to carry out the order, which why was he was picked in the first place.

If someone came up to you in the street, said he was God and ordered you to kill someone, and another person, a stranger, screamed at you not to do it, would you naturally believe the first guy, regard the stranger as Satan, and get your dagger out? That was Abraham’s view of the situation, and half of the modern world agree with him. And then these psychos wonder why the world is evil? It’s because of THEM. Allah orders Ishmael’s death and Shaytan begs for Ishmael’s life. Which one is good and which evil? Only a monster would be unable to give the right answer. Which are you? – a monster or a decent, moral human being?

Who would ever consider perpetrating human sacrifice just because someone calling himself “God” commanded it (where was the proof provided that Abraham’s God was what he claimed to be? – it’s simply stated as a fact, yet all the evidence of his behaviour points in the opposite direction). In the modern world, anyone who heard a voice in his head telling him to kill people would be instantly sectioned under the Mental Health Act. Isn’t it extraordinary that half the world think such a person is the prophet of God? The horrific suspicion must remain that Earth is the cosmic mental asylum, the dumping ground for the universe’s nutters. That would explain everything at a stroke, don’t you think?

Abrahamism – not a religion but a mental illness. The Abrahamists are the damned. They are the followers of the true Satan and the story of Abraham is the surest proof of that. No sane person could possibly wish to emulate Abraham and raise a dagger to slaughter his own flesh and blood. How could anyone ever have imagined that the “God” of Abraham was anyone other than Satan? Who but Satan would command his prophet to perform human sacrifice? Would the True God ever do something so sick, grotesque and perverse? The Abrahamists proclaim that it is your sacred duty to slavishly obey “God” no matter that he is ordering you to murder your own child. To mindlessly follow orders is an unimpeachable and unarguable “good”, they say. Is it? Or is Abrahamism the religion of those who abdicate all moral responsibility for their own actions and claim that it’s all the “will of God”? If it is, you might as well be a robot. You have no free will and you are not human.

Billions of humans have worshipped the Devil for millennia and that’s why the world is so fucked, as the Gnostics saw with startling clarity. Surely it’s time for humanity to turn to Abraxas, the True God of Light, Reason and Freedom. The religion of Abraxas has no holy texts, no fanatical prophets, no churches, temples, synagogues or mosques. There are no rules, commandments and regulations. There are no prayer books or hymns. There are no dress codes, no Sabbath days, no threats of eternal hellfire. There is no mutilation of babies, no brainwashing, no inbuilt intolerance.

Instead, there is true spirituality. There is the philosophical, scientific, mathematical, psychological, artistic and religious endeavour to maximise human potential, as driven by the cosmic dialectic. Human beings are pre-Gods. To worship Satan or any deity or demon is anathema. Abraxas desires no worship. Why would he? He is our guide, opening the way for those with the eyes to see and the ears to hear. No human being should ever be on his knees to “God”. No human being should ever bow and scrape or pray and beg for divine intervention. Knowledge is our salvation, not faith. The latter was Satan’s greatest invention. What better trick than to create a system that despises knowledge, reason and logic and instead sanctifies blind obedience?

When Satan declares that you must make a human sacrifice of your own children to prove your faith then, if you sign up, you have removed yourself from the world of the sane, and voluntarily checked yourself into the cosmic mental asylum where the maddest behaviour is praised. Suicide bombings, honour killings, beheadings, hangings, stonings, floggings, Inquisitions, Witch trials, burnings, garrottings, crusades, jihads – all are welcome in Satan’s terrestrial abattoir. The “faithful” are the butchers and the sane are their human sacrifices.

Fuck Abraham.
Fuck the Jews.
Fuck the Christians.
Fuck the Muslims.
Fuck the Hindu caste system.

They are all Devil worshippers. Their existence has cursed this world and turned it into hell. They are the CAUSE of human misery. We will never be free until we are free of their mad, evil beliefs. No decent human being could ever mount any intellectual defence of Abraham, the world’s first psychopath.
__________

Abrahamism on Trial:

Imagine in the present day that a group of Jews, Muslims or Christians said that Abraham’s God had appeared to them and declared that the modern world had run out of faith and a new Covenant was required, to be made in the blood of their children. Previously, God had stayed Abraham’s hand at the last moment, but this time the actual deed was demanded since things were so bad in the world.

So, these people go ahead and slaughter their children. How should the Government respond? Should it order the immediate arrest of all these evil murderers? Or should their religious beliefs be respected? After all, these people are no different from Abraham himself, a figure celebrated by half of the world. The people arresting them might be Abrahamists themselves, prepared to kill their own children if God ordered it.

There is a FUNDAMENTAL clash between human rights and Abrahamist religions, and it is one that must be addressed. That basically means that if the Abrahamists do not renounce and denounce Abraham then their religions should be declared illegal on the grounds that they are incompatible with the Declaration of Human Rights. No one anywhere has the right to take life because they heard the voice of God in their head ordering them to do it. That is no defence.

Abraham’s actions would have been deemed illegal in any modern country – he took his own son hostage, bound him and then got ready to kill him. He would be charged with kidnap and attempted murder in the present day. So, should not these same countries that would put Abraham in jail for life declare unequivocally that the same thing should have been done to Abraham in the past i.e. his actions should be retrospectively judged as unlawful, and all adherents of Abrahamism should be compelled to take an oath solemnly condemning Abraham? Of course, that would mean the end of Abrahamism.

But why is that we are the only people on earth willing to expose the criminality that lies at the heart of Abrahamism? Why is this subject glossed over? What’s the point of having laws against murder and human sacrifice if religions sanction these things?
__________

Religion II:

“Every Stoic was a Stoic; but in Christendom where is the Christian?” –Ralph Waldo Emerson

Mainstream religions are systems of mental illness and their purpose is to spread their particular brand of madness. They are viruses of the psyche, the crack cocaine of the mind. When you become addicted you’re totally fucked, and you become addicted astoundingly fast. In no time at all, you can be contemplating blowing up yourself and hundreds of others in the name of “God”. Any healthy society would regard mainstream religion as more toxic than the drugs trade, doing infinitely more damage. Islamic terrorism is religious terrorism. It’s done for religious reasons. The War on Terror should therefore be recast as a War on Islam in particular and mainstream religion in general. Religion is Terror. Read the Torah, Bible or Koran and you will realise that these religions are designed to do nothing but terrify you into submission: hell-fire if you resist; paradise if you comply.

Christians believe that if you aren’t baptised, you will go to hell. So, baptism isn’t something you do as a positive choice born of enthusiasm, but out of absolute terror of what will happen if you don’t. For centuries, Catholic theologians were content to say that any baby that died at childbirth without the benefit of baptism went straight to Limbo – the edge of hell. Jews and Muslims believe they will go to hell if they are not Circumcised. Again, we see pure Terror being used to control people’s behaviour and beliefs.

Abrahamism = Terrorism. Most of its power comes from the eternal hell to which it promises to send people if they disobey. Poorly educated, superstitious, submissive people are horrifically susceptible to threats of hell. Here is truth – any religion that relies on Terror to get its message across is evil and Satanic by definition. The religion of the True God would never make blood-curdling threats against people. Why would the True God want to harm, torture and terrorise people? Any healthy society should declare as illegal all religions that are built on Terrorism. Therefore Abrahamism has no place in the modern world.

Now the Islamic maniacs are sending out schoolboys in school uniform to carry out suicide bombings. Is there no end to this psychosis? The War on Terror should be the War on Abrahamism. This is the 21st century. These ancient religions belong to another time, another pre-conscious, bicameral world. They have no role at all in modernity. Everyone who subscribes to them is mentally retarded. These religions existed long, long before the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, Darwinism, Freud, Jung, Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, modern philosophy, modern mathematics, modern science, modern medicine – the entire modern world.

Every Abrahamist is basically saying that the whole modern Age has been a complete waste of time and hasn’t added a scintilla of anything of worth to the dusty old “holy” books of Abrahamism. Abrahamism = Religion for Dopes, Dummies and Dunces. Abrahamism will perish because its followers are stupid and won’t be able to keep up with modernity. It has already happened with Islam – the most backward religion on earth. Muslims are regressing to the primal slime. They are undergoing reverse evolution. “In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.”
__________

They really are your Enemy:

The propaganda war can be fought in many ways. A YouTube video cleverly shows the ways in which Muslims have been demonised and the Western forces glorified: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anUTRdomg44.

“We” are heroes; “they” are savages and monsters. We are good, they are evil. We are normal, they are strange. We are right, they are wrong. We are kind, caring and democratic. They are brutal, cruel and totalitarian. We support freedom but they want to enslave everyone. Everything the video says is true. It provides an excellent analysis of how to create a convenient, stereotyped enemy. But now consider the clear subtext of the same video. It’s asserting that Islam is being deliberately maligned in the West as part of a grand conspiracy. However, anyone who knows anything about Islam knows that it uses all of the same techniques depicted in this video against the West. The UK is full of Jihadists who have watched endless videos that are the mirror image of this one – portraying Muslims as innocent victims or glorious and heroic martyrs and Westerners as devils and demons.

So why was this video made? Why did it choose to focus on Islam rather than, say, the Vietnam War? Is it in fact expertly made Islamic Jihadist propaganda? The subtext of any video is something to which you should pay particular attention. Always deconstruct it. Always find its centre. What hidden story is it trying to convey?

The reality is this – sometimes the enemy really is the enemy. Sometimes the bad guys really are the bad guys. The West should never have attacked Iraq and Afghanistan, but no one can deny that Islam has been begging for trouble. It keeps getting more and more aggressive and fanatical. When novelist Salman Rushdie was sentenced to death for writing The Satanic Verses, and those who translated his book were attacked and even murdered, it became clear that Islam had become pathological. It wasn’t the West that turned Islam into a backward, extremist ideology. Many people are now arguing that the West made the mistake of being excessively tolerant towards Islam rather than condemning it as utter barbarism. If you want to know the “truth” about Islam here are a couple of recommended reads: Understanding Muhammad by Ali Sina and The Truth about Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion by Robert Spencer.

Above all, read the Koran, the sacred text of Islam, and judge for yourself the supposedly exact word of God (in Arabic) personally dictated to Mohammed by the Angel Gabriel. Study Sharia Law. Study Islamic communities. Let no one deceive you. Islam is, to any rationally minded person, a staggeringly dangerous and horrific belief system that has always constituted an immense danger to the human race. More and more, Jihadists and their fellow travellers are trying to create an unofficial alliance with Western conspiracy theorists. Ask yourself a simple question. If 9/11 was a “satanic Illuminati freemasonic ritual to usher in the NWO”, why was it immediately greeted ecstatically by Palestinian Jihadists and why does it feature in Jihadist videos as an example of true heroism against the infidel and the Great Satan of America? Can any sane person deny that the 9/11 airplanes were hijacked by clearly identified Muslim maniacs whose every step beforehand has now been tracked in great detail?

These people will try to get you to join the Islamic Jihad against the West. Don’t buy it. Don’t take our word for it that Islam is evil – read the Koran for yourself. The message of the Koran is unambiguous – submit to Allah and his prophet Mohammed or else. It’s a protection racket conducted with extreme menaces: do what we say and we’ll protect you from hell; disobey and we’ll send you there right now. There is not a single feature worth admiring in Islam. There is not one line of the Koran worth remembering. It’s a mental vacuum. Sometimes, the propaganda against certain groups is accurate and necessary. If you are a supporter of Enlightenment values, you are an automatic enemy of Islam. Islam rejects every pillar of the Enlightenment. It has no role to play in modernity. It is the essence of Endarkenment.

According to the makers of the video we discussed, all the suicide bombings, beheadings, amputations, mutilations, honour killings, floggings, stonings, hangings, book burnings, flag burnings, hate-filled demonstrations, fatwas, death threats and plots against novelists and cartoonists, executions of filmmakers and book translators, assassinations of blasphemers, persecutions of minorities, murder of apostates etc etc are just a Western myth and wicked fantasy, a cynical exercise to make Westerners fear and loathe Islam without any justification. None of it happened at all. The Muslims are peace-loving, gentle, compassionate and merciful people. Dream on. We’re not falling for it.

In Italy, a man called Mohammed (naturally) murdered his own daughter (slitting her throat 28 times) because she refused an arranged marriage and was too “Westernised”, hence had brought shame on her family and on Islam. Every year, 5,000 Muslim girls and women are murdered by male family members in the name of “honour”. Who weeps for them? Who demands justice for them? Who takes any action against this annual slaughter? No one at all! Yet we are told we have the wrong idea about Islam, that it’s all evil Western propaganda. We are in the midst of the propaganda war to beat them all. Jihadists who despise the West and loathe freedom are trying to portray themselves as innocent victims. Why? To stop you taking the measures that must be taken against them in the name of reason, morality and freedom. The more they can sow seeds of doubt in your mind, the less of a threat you are to their plans for global Sharia Law. The wolves are donning the sheep’s’ clothing in order to manipulate you.

Don’t believe anyone. Don’t believe us. Think for yourself. Use your reason, intuition and judgement.

The Jihadists are now attempting to ally themselves with all of those who oppose the privileged elite that run the world. But the Jihadists are not your friends. They are worse than the privileged elite. The elite at least allow you to cling to the illusion of freedom. If you’re unfortunate enough to live under Sharia Law, even the illusion is stripped from you.

******

A Sky News report (February 8 2011).

The founder of a New York TV station set up to promote tolerance and understanding has been convicted of beheading his wife in the studio. Muzzammil Hassan did not deny killing his wife Aasiyah, but had claimed he was the victim of ongoing domestic violence. However, the jury took just an hour to reject his claim that the killing was justified because of the “abuse” he described. The couple ran a Muslim-oriented TV station in Buffalo which they hoped would promote cultural understanding following the September 11 attacks. Hassan, who defended himself in court, was arrested in February 2009 after walking into a police station and telling officers his wife was dead. Mrs Hassan’s body was then found at the TV station they started in 2004. Prosecutors said the 46-year-old bought two hunting knives less than an hour before the attack, then lay in wait inside the studios. CCTV captured some of the assault in which the victim was stabbed more than 40 times in the face, back and chest and then beheaded. Hassan had been given divorce papers just a week before his wife’s body was found.

Islam is an insult to human freedom and dignity. That’s a simple fact. Arguably, Islam is the most evil religion the world has ever endured: Satanism brought to logical perfection. It despises EVERYTHING that the Illuminati stand for. The “Truth Army” is the opposite of what it purports to be. It’s the army of lies, mania and unapologetic Devil-worship.
__________

5/10

OC: Why would the Pentagon be the most heavily defended building on earth? Defended from whom? Are America’s neighbours, the Mexicans and the Canadians, likely to attack it any time soon? By the time the Chinese Air Force got within thousands of miles of the USA, the two nations would be in a full-scale war with each other. A hostile aircraft carrier couldn’t get anywhere near the USA. Submarine missile launch would be dealt with at the coast. It would be a complete waste of time and money to give the Pentagon special security. Besides, it’s a reinforced building and it takes a hell of a lot to do any damage to it. They have little more than the usual barriers and security checks. They were taken completely by surprise by the hijacked plane attack, and who wants to shoot down a commercial airline over central Washington DC? It made complete sense to allow the Pentagon to be struck rather than shoot down the plane – little damage was done and far fewer people died than if the plane had been shot down over the city. No country at the time viewed internal flights with any degree of suspicion. That’s what made the attack so effective.

CT: The Pentagon is the HQ of the US Armed Forces; it’s the nerve centre of the world’s second biggest war-machine. China has quietly outgrown the US in raw military force in recent years. It better be the most heavily defended building on Earth!

It’s certainly heavily defended; there will be air AA guns and SAM sites for miles around, doubtless very well concealed. Likewise, there is a huge staff and armed garrison there, and most infantrymen are trained in man-launched SAM missiles. The Pentagon of course has direct and immediate contact with the HQ of the US Air Force, not to mention the White House and the US Navy. So if they did decide to shoot down a rogue jet, they could, what with all flights being identified by radio transponder and easily distinguishable, even considering heavy air traffic.

So why didn’t they shoot down the plane? It could be that the PR issues relating to shooting down a civilian plane, even a hijacked one, outweighed the other costs of just letting it hit; fair point, although I don’t think that anyone who might have seen it that way (are there many PR media gurus wandering around the Pentagon?) would have been near enough to the Big Red Phone to call of the airstrike in time. Plus, the official story was that the entire US Air Force was on manoeuvres (what, ALL of them?) and the AA guns, SAM sites and rocket-troopers where left unmentioned. I simply do not believe that there wasn’t even a single semper-fi-do-or-die wannabe Rambo Yankee meathead marine with a rocket launcher to try and shoot down the plane on the Pentagon lawn. And the lawn is a case in itself, having survived an alleged air-crash completely unscorched and without a scrap of debris visible; unchanged before, during and after. Just an observation. I could get really paranoid and ask where the wings of the plane went. Disintegrated. Allegedly.

OC: This is the Pentagon’s “defence force”:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Protective_Service

The Pentagon is really just an office block full of bureaucrats. Everything in it is duplicated elsewhere, especially in huge underground nuclear bunkers under mountains. Do you think the President would hide in the Pentagon during an emergency? Not a chance!!! In the Cold War, it was expected the Pentagon would be destroyed in a Soviet nuclear strike, so it already has inbuilt redundancy. We have the internet now and excellent mobile communications. No one needs the Pentagon!!

No one in their right mind would blow up a plane over a city. Thousands would die, fires would erupt everywhere, a whole zone of the city would be totalled. You shoot it down over farmland – not over a city. Unless you were in a war, no sane person would be deploying SAM missiles in city environments. You wouldn’t even contemplate having them around in case they fell into the wrong hands!

And who’s going to pay for all this alleged security? Even the Pentagon has a budget.

Yes, of course the wings disintegrated. How robust is a wing compared with incredibly thick reinforced concrete? It would be miraculous if they did anything other than disintegrate.

Debris was visible and there was minor scorching. Anyway, even if someone fired a missile into the Pentagon, as some people claimed, where’s the scorched grass that followed the explosion? You can’t have it both ways. No one disagrees there was an explosion, so why didn’t the heat and fire scorch the grass much more visibly? Who knows? But this certainly isn’t a point in favour of the Truthers. Or have the Pentagon come up with new non-scorching explosives, or non-scorching grass?

CT: Good counter evidence, but “an office building”?

There are two stories behind why it’s called “The Pentagon”; the first is that it was designed, like so many other famous American buildings, by Satanists. I give that idea as much credit as you do, which is to say none.

The second story goes that the design is based on Roman principles of defence; it’s a five sided building (so that it’s hard to attack one face of the building head-on without coming under fire from one of the other angled overlooking walls), and each face consists of five reinforced concrete and steel walls, staggered through the building in concentric pentagons to resist HEAP missiles. Allegedly the ‘plane’ (whose wings totally disintegrated, remember), drove straight through three of those layers of concrete and steel like an arrow, drilling a tunnel deep inside before exploding. I’m not saying it was a High Explosive Armour Piercing Missile, just that the damage is not consistent with a plane.

It’s a fortress. The notion that it only has a garrison since 9/11… sure, ok. Official records tell us that there is no garrison, no infantry, no air defences at the Pentagon. Sure, I’ll buy that.

Remember when the British govt denied the existence of the SAS and MI6? The US still denies the existence of Delta Force (they’re the elite presidential guard; they wear raybans as part of the uniform, no joke). Military personnel at the Pentagon? What a strange idea.

The argument about shooting planes down over cities and the PR effect is a good one; the idea that Pentagon is less well defended than any army base of equivalent size though… no, I can’t credit that. On SAM sites; they’re either buried in minibunkers on wooded hills, or the man-launched missiles are kept in the armoury. Standard design for an armoury (at least for British military) is a buried concrete room, a solid steel cell door, and a steel cage inside the room bracing the walls; they’re very secure, what with the armed guards and alarms and all.

The question I’d raise on shooting down the plane or not; why didn’t they shoot down the Camp David plane? Besides the obvious fact that it crashed when passengers stormed the cockpit. Note that I’m not for a moment denying the planes or the incident; what I’m saying is that the orders came from within the US govt. No, obviously most of the people involved wouldn’t have known, or the truth really would be out there already. But governments have performed false flag attacks before (Hitler, Reichstag), and as I said at the outset, I don’t believe that the Taliban have either the ability or indeed the motivation to attack the US. They arrived in Afghanistan as US mercenaries, for one, having been hired off the Saudis.

OC: The physical construction of the Pentagon demonstrates the symbolic power of the American military, but it is nevertheless just a glorified office, full of paper shufflers and people getting home by five to pick up their kids etc.

What’s so great about conspiracy theorists is that they all seem to be experts in plane design, building design, civil engineering, architecture, explosive effects, physics, chemistry, metallurgy etc.

Weren’t we just saying just the other day that most people don’t have a clue what gravity is? So how come we’re all experts on the precise effects of unprecedented explosions in places and situations that have never been tested before? Most people have no idea what a plane does when it hits a building like the Pentagon – what makes any uninformed person think they know? Since when have we had any empirical data? A computer simulation of what happened looked perfectly plausible…one of the first things that happened was that the wings started disintegrating and folding into the fuselage.

The Pentagon isn’t a functional military site – it’s not on the frontline of anything. It’s a building in the capital of the USA where bureaucrats go. It has minimal defences because there are minimal threats to it. Until not so long ago, you could walk up to the front door of Downing Street or the White House. Does Langley have Sam missiles all around it? FBI HQ? Capitol Hill? The White House?

Naval headquarters? Air Fleet HQ? Delta Force HQ? Marines HQ? Submarine HQ? Do the Americans have unlimited budgets for once in a century events? Imagine being the Pentagon’s SAM missile operator from 1960 to 2001? I bet he wrote very long novels!

Remember Pearl Harbour? That happened while America was profoundly alarmed about Japanese intentions and a full-scale war was raging in Europe, yet still they were caught sleeping. So much for security.

9/11 was an “under-the-radar” low-tech attack that took a superpower by surprise. America was always a target for Muslims because of its absurd support of Israel. It was logical it would be targeted.

CT: I don’t actually have the Pentagon blueprints to hand; I’m going on a documentary I saw and what seems like common sense in defending the US Military HQ, e.g. SAM sites and a garrison. Naval headquarters, Air Force HQ, Delta Force HQ? Marines HQ, Submarine HQ… yes, they would have SAM sites. The White House might, the others probably don’t. Downing Street doesn’t, but there are several garrisons of infantry within rapid response range, who would have access to LAW Rockets, which are standard issue to the British Army Infantryman.

OC: No one said the Pentagon was undefended. The point was that until 9/11 it had little more than police-level perimeter security. You couldn’t walk in without authorization, obviously. But it would be a complete waste of tax dollars to heavily defend installations that are unlikely ever to come under a concerted attack by a major hostile force unless an actual war were in progress. Seriously, do you think every possible target should be heavily defended at all times egardless of the likelihood of an attack? Part of the CT analysis is hat everyone has unlimited budgets and resources. They don’t. Look at the MI5 and MI6 HQs. There’s no sign of heavy security. They have nothing more than a few security men hanging around. Who would want their taxes spent on loads of guys who never have to do anything?!

So, why did the US government attack the Pentagon then? What was the point? Why not leave it as just the Twin Towers if they wanted to perform a false flag attack?

The White House/Capitol Hill, the Pentagon and the Twin Towers are exactly what I would attack if I were a Muslim fanatic. I would do the Twin Towers on their own if I were a false flagger conspirator. The more targets, the bigger the operation has to be, and the higher the chances of it being compromised. There was simply no sensible point in attacking the Pentagon as well.

CT: Good point, not every military or government building is a ‘hard-target’; but HQs, such as the Pentagon or MI6 will be very secure. Even the normal level of defence at a police station is extreme; most large UK police stations have armouries and ALL American ones do, alongside all their riot gear. So even minimal police-force security is a pretty tough nut to crack; even turning down the security level at the Pentagon way below what I think is feasible, we’re still talking Military Police, which means that their men are soldiers and their riot gear includes rocket launchers.

And I know that for a fact. Even for prestige value, the Pentagon would warrant top-notch security, certainly enough to mobilise a response. The most effective argument you’ve come up with, and that I am considering, is that strategically it would be better to take the hit and then retaliate with full public support.

OC: Imagine it’s August, 2001. An unknown number of hijacked aircraft are in London airspace. Air traffic control have been ordered to ground every plane. No one’s sure who the hijackers are, where they’re going, what they want or what they’re going to do. No clear instructions are coming from Downing Street. Confusion reigns.

There are rumours flying everywhere. An aircraft is detected heading straight towards Parliament. You’re seriously telling me that you think some soldier/cop/security guard is going to pop out of a guardroom in Parliament with a rocket launcher and, without any orders from the highest possible level, shoot down a commercial jet with hundreds of people in it? That’s just madness. It would never happen. NEVER.

That kind of decision is way beyond any soldier’s pay grade. Imagine if he called it wrong?!! The scenario you envisage is impossible on every level. No one at the Pentagon on 9/11 would ever have done what you suggest.

No soldier would have contemplated firing missiles at a civilian plane. Would YOU shoot down a plane without direct orders?! The plane came in really fast, at ground level. There was virtually no time to react. No one knew for sure what was going on.

An order to shoot down a commercial plane would have to come from Bush, Cheney or Rumsfeld – and they were all getting rushed to safe zones while the Pentagon attack was going down. Our idiot western leaders are so inept and indecisive that they didn’t know what to do. Remember Michael Moore’s famous footage of Bush sitting in the classroom? That’s what a clown way out of his depth looks like – and his entire administration were every bit as inept.

PR had nothing to do with it – it was just sheer confusion and incompetence …headless chickens running around.

Of course governments are wicked and are conspiring against the people – just common sense as you say…but they can’t manage anything sophisticated. Their conspiracies are mostly about feathering their own nests…not blowing up their own citizens (though they would if they absolutely had to!).

The first Twin Towers attack by a Muslim nut proves that the Muslims were very interested in bringing down the Twin Towers. That was their dry run.

And think of this – the British police are so inept that they shot dead a completely innocent man in Stockwell underground station. Every part of the Stockwell operation demonstrated staggering ineptitude. And you think people like that, and their American counterparts, can manage elaborate conspiracies? This is fantasy land. Anyone who was part of a conspiracy would spill the beans in a best-selling book and be on Oprah Winfrey. You can’t keep a conspiracy as huge as that secret. Hundreds of people would have known about it. Someone would have talked.
__________

Tower 5:

OC: So, what about Tower 5?

Tower 5 was not hit by a plane, and, unlike Tower 7, it didn’t collapse (but was demolished later). Clearly (in videos of the building), a huge and intense fire is raging. The enormous fireballs that erupted from the twin towers obviously set fire to buildings all around. Why wouldn’t they?

You can’t argue that all skyscraper fires are the same. How do you know if the materials used were the same, or the heights of the skyscrapers, or the base areas, or the tolerances, or any special design features? There are loads of factors involved. The fact that no one fought the fire is another huge point. Also, the collapse of the twotowers must have sent massive shockwaves through the whole site. It would have been the equivalent of a strong localized earthquake. The foundations of all the towers in the area would have received a devastating shock. How do you know what such a shock would do to a building already with strong fires blazing in its core?

No one on earth would know in advance what effects the 9/11 circumstances would have. These are things that need to be studied by engineers, architects, scientists, demolition experts – not by a bunch of paranoid CTers with no technical qualifications but very fertile minds. This CT stuff makes a complete mockery of the scientific method.

Science progresses by experts carefully collecting data, forming hypotheses, testing them and verifying them, refining where necessary. It doesn’t involve non-experts with an axe to grind trying to look at anomalous photos and videos and saying – “Look, that can’t be right!” That’s more like how religions work – people who can see the face of Jesus in a slice of toast etc!!

It’s surprising that you didn’t mention that the CIA/FBI or some such other organization had offices in Tower 7.

CT: I don’t know about Tower 5, but it looks like enough fire damage to warrant demolishing afterwards. And engineers have come forward, a good number of them, to testify that skyscrapers don’t fall down from fire or earthquakes; they’re built to resist both. Notice no one questions that the tower withstood impacts from planes; that didn’t bring them down, but apparently burning jet fuel did. Again; jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel.
__________

Tower 7:

CT: Tower 7 wasn’t hit by a plane. It wasn’t even on fire. What’s far fetched is that it collapsed at all. Somehow, the tax records for the Enron scandal happened to disintegrate in the freak collapse, which just happened, completely coincidentally, at the same time as the, ahem, terrorist attack.

OC: What is far-fetched about this account of Tower 7?…

“On August 21, 2008, NIST released its draft report on the causes of the collapse of 7 World Trade Center, beginning a period for public comments. In its investigation, NIST utilized ANSYS to model events leading up to collapse initiation and LS-DYNA models to simulate the global response to the initiating events. NIST determined that diesel fuel did not play an important role, nor did the structural damage from the collapse of the twin towers. But the lack of water to fight the fire was an important factor. The fires burned out of control during the afternoon, including on floor 13, where a critical interior column buckled. With the buckling of that column, adjacent columns also failed along with the floor structure above. This triggered a vertical progression of floor failures to the roof. The collapse then progressed east-to-west across the structure, and ultimately the entire structure collapsed. The fires, fuelled by office contents, along with the lack of water, were the key reasons for the collapse.”
__________

In Summary:

There is no smoking gun. There is no hard evidence. The logic of the alleged false flag conspiracy theory is absurd. None of it makes sense. The official version is much more plausible. Occam’s Razor supports the official version. To be opposed to the Old World Order does not mean that you should accuse them of everything under the sun. They are vile, dangerous, greedy, evil people, but that doesn’t mean that they carried out 9/11. The OWO knew 9/11 was coming and did nothing about it.

That was their crime, and it is an extremely serious one for which they should be held to account. Instead, they have been let off the hook by all the ridiculous claims of the “Truth Movement”. There is every reason to believe that the CIA started the “Truth Movement” as a means to distract people from asking the serious question: why was a red carpet laid out for terrorists? There were many opportunities to stop 9/11 and none were taken. Why not? Because the government wanted a pretext to launch a Middle East war. That is the true scandal.

******

We are often asked about 9/11. Was the American government involved, or not?
__________

Acts of Omission:

If we were to say that the American government took no explicit part in any conspiracy to kill its own citizens, would that indicate that the American government had no culpability? There are several ways to skin a cat. Governments often choose to use the tactic of omission rather than commission. In other words, rather than do something themselves, they wait for their enemy to do it, and deliberately omit to take the steps necessary to prevent it. They know it is about to happen, but they choose not to stop it because it is, in fact, precisely what they want.

If one asks the most important question of all in any conspiracy scenario – cui bono? (to whose benefit?) – one can see that numerous American neocon foreign policy and economic objectives were satisfied in the aftermath of 9/11.

Acts of omission are almost impossible to prove. Incompetence and negligence are always cited rather than conscious intent on the part of a government to allow the slaughter of its own citizens to take place Therefore, governments frequently employ this tactic. It permits “plausible deniability”.

No one should forget that the CIA had extensive contacts with the mujahedeen during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, and provided them with arms and intelligence. It is inconceivable that they did not come into contact with such a prominent figure as Osama bin Laden, and many of the future leaders of the Taliban. Either the CIA are one of the most inept organisations on earth, (they aren’t!) or they were well aware of what was happening in Afghanistan. In which case, why did they do nothing?

During WWII, the British broke German secret codes. Several times, they permitted disastrous events to happen, with thousands of their own people dying, even though they could have stopped any of those disasters. But to stop them would have alerted the Germans that their codes had been cracked. The ‘greater good’ dictated that it was preferable for innocent citizens to be killed than for the enemy to learn that its secret codes had been compromised. Be in no doubt – governments are always prepared to sacrifice their own citizens if they think it is in the greater interest of their policy aims. No one is protecting you. Your lives are dispensable.
__________

4/9

It is estimated that lawyers and administrators working on the winding down of the American and international operations of Lehman Brothers investment bank will eventually reach $4 billion. Nice money for the vultures feeding on the carcass. Why should any bank be allowed to reach the scale where it costs billions simply to shut it down? All of these banking leviathans should be broken up into much smaller units.

9/11 was caused by American support for Zionism. There would have been no 9/11 and no “War on Terror” if America had adopted the sensible position of remaining neutral in relation to Israel. Zionism has been a catastrophe for America, dragging it into costly wars that have made it one of the most unpopular nations in the world, just as Israel is for its war crimes against the Palestinians. Gaza is effectively a concentration camp, or a walled-up ghetto just like the ones the Jews hemselves were once forced to endure by the Nazis.

“Truthers” often condemn us for not taking their side over 9/11.

Let’s be clear about this. Anyone who seriously thinks that Mossad or he CIA/FBI/Special Forces carried out 9/11 rather than fanatical Muslims on a martyrdom operation is a nutcase.

The Bush government was an abomination. Zionism is an ongoing abomination. That does not mean that 9/11 was an American or Jewish operation. People seem to forget that Islamic fundamentalism is also an abomination and is one of the most dangerous and evil forces in the modern world. Muslims have carried out thousands of suicide martyrdom operations in the last forty years. Muslims have hijacked many planes in the last forty years. 9/11 was a martyrdom operation involving planes hijacked by Muslim fanatics. What’s hard to understand? Everything about 9/11 fitted the precise modus operandi of Islamic radicals. Nothing about it fitted the modus operandi of the CIA/FBI/Mossad. Two plus two equals four, unless you can’t count.

Why would anyone in their right mind see 9/11 as anything other than extremist Muslims attacking America for its support of Zionism? Two plus two.

The Muslim extremists who carried out 9/11 had:

1) the motive (hatred of America’s pro-Zionist, anti-Islamic foreign policy).

2) the motivation (a chance to heroically strike back against America and, above, all, to become martyrs).

3) the means (hijacking planes with box cutters and fake bombs).

4) the money (supplied by Osama bin Laden, a very wealthy Arab).

5) the organization (all of the resources of Al Qaeda were put at their disposal).

6) the opportunity (they had lived in America for months beforehand, taking flying lessons).

7) the surprise (no such operation had ever been undertaken before; America was completely unprepared).

8) the track record (thousands of Muslims had carried out suicide bombings; 9/11 simply used hijacked planes as the suicide bombs).

9) the precedent (in 1994 – seven years before 9/11 – Muslim suicide bombers from Algeria hijacked a plane and intended to crash it into the centre of Paris; they were killed by French Special Forces. The 9/11 gang learned all of the lessons of this first bungled attempt.)

10) the prior attempt (in 1993, Muslim fanatics had previously tried to blow up the Twin Towers with a van bomb: this was their No.1 global target).

If that isn’t persuasive enough, what about this list (courtesy of Wikipedia) of Islamic terrorist attacks in the last two decades:

1) 26 February 1993 – World Trade Center bombing, New York City. 6 killed.

2) March 1993 – Bombay bombings. Mumbai, India. 250 dead, 700 injured.

3) 28 July 1994 – Buenos Aires, Argentina. Vehicle suicide bombing attack against AMIA building, the local Jewish community representation. 85 dead, more than 300 injured.

4) 24 December 1994 – Air France Flight 8969 hijacking in Algiers by 3 members of Armed Islamic Group of Algeria and another terrorist. 7 killed including 4 hijackers.

5) 25 June 1996 – Khobar Towers bombing, 20 killed, 372 wounded.

6) 17 November 1997 – Luxor attack, 6 armed Islamic terrorists attack tourists at Egypt’s famous Luxor Ruins. 68 foreign tourists killed.

7) 14 February 1998 – Bombing in Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. 13 bombs explode within a 12 km radius. 46 killed and over 200 injured.

8) 7 August 1998 – 1998 United States embassy bombings in Tanzania and Kenya. 224 dead. 4000+ injured.

9) 4 September 1999 – A series of bombing attacks in several cities of Russia, nearly 300 killed.

10) 12 October 2000 – Attack on the USS Cole in the Yemeni port of Aden.

11) 11 September 2001 – 4 planes hijacked and crashed into World Trade Center and The Pentagon by 19 hijackers. Nearly 3000 dead.

12) 13 December 2001 – Suicide attack on Indian parliament in New Delhi by Pakistan-based Islamist terrorist organizations, Jaish-EMohammad and Lashkar-e-Toiba. Aimed at eliminating the top leadership of India and causing anarchy in the country. 7 dead, 12 injured.

13) 27 March 2002 – Suicide bomb attack on a Passover Seder in a Hotel in Netanya, Israel. 30 dead, 133 injured.

14) 30 March 2002 and 24 November 2002 – Attacks on the Hindu Raghunath temple, India. Total 25 dead.

15) 7 May 2002 – Bombing in al-Arbaa, Algeria. 49 dead, 117 injured.

16) 24 September 2002 – Machine Gun attack on Hindu temple in Ahmedabad, India. 31 dead, 86 injured.

17) 12 October 2002 – Bombing in Bali nightclub. 202 killed, 300 injured.

18) 16 May 2003 – Casablanca Attacks – 4 simultaneous attacks in Casablanca killing 33 civilians (mostly Moroccans) carried by Salafia Jihadia.

19) 11 March 2004 – Multiple bombings on trains near Madrid, Spain. 191 killed, 1460 injured (alleged link to Al-Qaeda).

20) 1 September 2004 – Beslan school hostage crisis, approximately 344 civilians including 186 children killed.

21) 2 November 2004 – The murder of Theo van Gogh (film director) by Amsterdam-born jihadist Mohammed Bouyeri.

22) 4 February 2005 – Muslim terrorists attacked the Christian community in Demsa, Nigeria, killing 36 people, destroying property and displacing an additional 3000 people.

23) 5 July 2005 – Attack at the Hindu Ram temple at Ayodhya, India; one of the most holy sites of Hinduism. 6 dead.

24) 7 July 2005 – Multiple bombings in London Underground. 52 killed by four suicide bombers. Nearly 700 injured.

25) 23 July 2005 – Bomb attacks at Sharm el-Sheikh, an Egyptian resort city, at least 64 people killed.

26) 29 October 2005 – 29 October 2005 Delhi bombings, India. Over 60 killed and over 180 injured in a series of three attacks in crowded markets and a bus, just 2 days before the Diwali festival.

27) 9 November 2005 – 2005 Amman bombings. A series of coordinated suicide attacks on hotels in Amman, Jordan. Over 60 killed and 115 injured. Four attackers including a husband and wife team were involved.

28) 7 March 2006 – 2006 Varanasi bombings, India. A series of attacks in the Sankath Mochan Hanuman temple and Cantonment Railway Station in the Hindu holy city of Varanasi. 28 killed and over 100 injured.

29) 11 July 2006 – 11 July 2006 Mumbai train bombings, Mumbai, India; a series of seven bomb blasts that took place over a period of 11 minutes on the Suburban Railway in Mumbai. 209 killed and over 700 injured.

30) 14 August 2007 – Qahtaniya bombings: Four suicide vehicle bombers massacred nearly 800 members of northern Iraq’s Yazidi sect in the deadliest Iraq war’s attack to date.

31) 26 July 2008 – 2008 Ahmedabad bombings, India. Islamic terrorists detonate at least 21 explosive devices in the heart of this industrial capital, leaving at least 56 dead and 200 injured. A Muslim group calling itself the Indian Mujahideen claims responsibility.

Indian authorities believe that extremists with ties to Pakistan and/or Bangladesh are likely responsible and are intent on inciting communal violence. Investigation by Indian police led to the eventual arrest of a number of terrorists suspected of carrying out the blasts, most of whom belong to a well-known terrorist group, The Students Islamic Movement of India.

32) 13 September 2008 – Bombing series in Delhi, India. Pakistani extremist groups plant bombs at several places including India Gate, out of which the ones at Karol Bagh, Connaught Place and Greater Kailash explode leaving around 30 people dead and 130 injured, followed by another attack two weeks later at the congested Mehrauli area, leaving 3 people dead.

33) 26 November 2008 – Muslim extremists kill at least 174 people and wound numerous others in a series of coordinated attacks on India’s largest city and financial capital, Mumbai. A group calling itself the Deccan Mujahedeen claims responsibility, however, the government of India suspects Islamic terrorists based in Pakistan are responsible. Ajmal Kasab, one of the terrorists, was caught alive.

34) 25 October 2009. Baghdad, Iraq. During a terrorist attack, two bomber vehicles detonated in the Green Zone, killing at least 155 people and injuring 520.

35) 28 October 2009 – Peshawar, Pakistan. A car bomb is detonated in a woman exclusive shopping district, and over 110 killed and over 200 injured.

36) 5 November 2009 – Fort Hood shooting, Texas, USA. U.S. Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan, an American Muslim of Palestinian descent, shot and killed 13 people and wounded 30 others at a U.S. Army base.

37) 3 December 2009 – Mogadishu, Somalia. A male suicide bomber disguised as a woman detonates in a hotel meeting hall. The hotel was hosting a graduation ceremony for local medical students when the blast went off, killing four government ministers as well as other civilians.

38) 25 December 2009 – Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab (also referred to as Umar Abdul Mutallab and Omar Farooq al-Nigeri; born December 22, 1986, in Lagos, Nigeria) is a Muslim Nigerian citizen who attempted to detonate plastic explosives hidden in his underwear while on board Northwest Airlines Flight 253, en route from Amsterdam to Detroit, Michigan, on December 25, 2009. He was subsequently charged on six criminal counts, including attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction and attempted murder of 289 people.

39) 1 January 2010 – Lakki Marwat, Pakistan. A suicide car bomber drove his explosive-laden vehicle into a volleyball pitch as people gathered to watch a match killing more than 100 people.

40) 1 May 2010 – New York, New York, USA. Faisal Shahzad, an Islamic Pakistani American who received U.S. citizenship in December 2009, attempted to detonate a car bomb in Times Square working with the Pakistani Taliban or Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan.

41) 28 May 2010 – Attacks on Ahmadi Mosques Lahore, Pakistan. Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan claimed attacks on two mosques simultaneously belonging to the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, killing nearly 100 and injuring many others.

Were these all the work of the CIA and Mossad? If not, then why does anyone think Muslim extremist were incapable of carrying out 9/11? If it looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck then it’s a duck! 9/11 bore all of the hallmarks of Islamic terrorism. It was entirely in accord with previous Islamic terrorist operations, it was entirely in accord with Islamic threats against America, and it was entirely consistent with all known data concerning Islamic terrorism.

So, why is all of this so difficult for “Truthers” to understand and accept? Why is it more credible that Mossad or American special forces did it (as part of an elaborate American-Zionist government conspiracy) given the overwhelming and prima facie evidence that it was perpetrated by Muslim Jihadists who had carried out a host of extremely violent attacks against Western targets?

America believed that its fanatical support for Zionism was consequence-free. America thought it was immune from attack on home soil. 9/11 showed that the American understanding of the global political situation could not have been any more simplistic and deluded. The American government was asking for trouble and got it in buckets.

Only people with a pathological hatred of the very principle of government would blame government for everything. If you are an ally of the Tea Party, you are no ally of ours. If you are an ally of Osama bin Laden, you are no ally of ours. If you are an ally of anarcho-capitalist libertarianism, you are no ally of ours.

So, make your mind up – whose side are you on? Islam? Anarchy? Capitalism? Libertarianism? Or meritocracy – good government in the name of the people.

American support of Zionism is the real issue of 9/11. The idea that on 9/11 the American government hijacked four planes (via remote control or suicidal agents in no need of a pension) and flew them into three targets (but screwed up with the fourth – great plan, guys) is so comical you would need to have taken leave of your senses to believe it for even one second. Sure, it’s always worthwhile to raise the possibility that the government might have done it, but if the evidence just isn’t there then the conspiracy theory has to be abandoned. That’s the rational approach. But the irrationally minded will cling to the theory no matter what.

Many persuasive arguments were put forward to suggest that the American moon landings were faked, but a scientist went through every single point and refuted them all one by one, showing exactly how the fallacies had arisen. If you are a Gnostic, you pursue knowledge. If you are a “believer”, you don’t care about knowledge, about facts, about evidence. 9/11 Truthers are believers. Whatever happened to their internal Devil’s Advocate?

Never forget Occam’s razor – the simplest explanation is usually correct. “Do not multiply entities unnecessarily.” The amount of “entities” that need to be multiplied to make 9/11 a government plot is astronomical. Bad governments should be held accountable for the many crimes they DID commit, not the imaginary ones they didn’t. The Tea Party are crazy, racist, anarcho-capitalist libertarians, obsessed with imagined government conspiracies. They despise government in principle.

We despise bad government, but we are not against government per se. We are advocates of strong, effective, wise, meritocratic government. Increasingly, we are repulsed by all mention of conspiracy theories because their most fervent advocates are usually members of the Tea Party. The Tea Party regard government as an intrinsic conspiracy against the people.

The Tea Party are extremely dangerous anarchists who want America and the world to become like the old Wild West. They want a restoration of fundamentalist Christian values, the right to go around armed to the teeth, and the right to engage in unregulated ultra capitalism where markets and private corporations dictate everything. These people are every bit as dangerous as the OWO. In fact they overlap with the OWO in numerous places.

“Truthers” and the Tea Party are virtually synonymous. Their agenda is to undermine the concept of government in order to replace it with their anarcho-capitalism. Why does no one ask questions about their conspiracy? They are massively motivated to blame the government for everything.

It’s one thing to oppose the corrupt, self-serving Washington D.C. establishment, it’s quite another to want to replace government with capitalist markets based on profit-driven, unaccountable private corporations, to replace “Big Government” with “Big Business”. You’d better make sure you know what side you’re on, and for what reasons. It’s not true that your enemy’s enemy is always your friend. Sometimes they can be your enemy too. The Tea Party, just as much as the OWO, represents everything to which we are opposed.

The Philosopher King of the Tea Party is a dead Austrian economist called Friedrich Hayek, a ferocious enemy of the power of the state. His most famous work is The Road to Serfdom in which he argues that under big government we become serfs (he is silent on what we are under big business; worker drones perhaps?). It is now being treated as a holy text. It was a favourite work of the two members of the Old World Order who kick started the recent massive increase in the OWO’s power: Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan.

Thatcher, a truly evil individual, is infamous for saying, “There is no such thing as society.” That is indeed the core position of libertarianism. It’s all about families and individuals operating with ruthless self-interest to try to create a competitive advantage for themselves. It’s the creed of privilege and power. It’s the gospel of hate towards others. In short, it’s the Gospel of Satan.

The OWO are two-faced. They support big government if it’s advancing their agenda and controlling the servile masses; they hate state power if it encroaches on their “free market” ideology i.e. their rigged, unregulated cartels. The state is in fact an OWO compromise. If they could get away with doing without it, they would. They need it as part of the illusion of “freedom and democracy”.

Big government is indeed a catastrophe if it resembles what goes on in Washington D.C. – a puppet administration of the OWO, up for sale to the highest bidder, packed with the incompetent beneficiaries of cronyism, nepotism and privilege. But big government of the people and for the people, and operated by the most meritorious of the people is the means to deliver people permanently from serfdom.

Texan Republican Ron Paul, a libertarian presidential candidate at the 2008 election is a huge fan of Hayek. So is his son Rand Paul, Republican Senator for Kentucky. Paul junior is on record as having said that he would not have voted for the Civil Rights Act that outlawed discrimination against African Americans. His justification was that such an Act contravened strict libertarian dogma because it allowed government interference with private business. If a businessman refused to serve blacks, that was his right. What did it have to do with government? Do you agree with that?

Hayek’s book is often bracketed with Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand’s monstrous tribute to the super rich. Rand was of Jewish stock and one of her greatest disciples was Alan Greenspan (another Jew), primary architect of the financial meltdown of 2008. Another libertarian hero is the Jewish economist Milton Friedman.

Libertarianism is a highly Jewish ideology. For Jews, such an ideology is perhaps understandable since they have a natural revulsion towards state power since it has often been savagely directed against them. Of course, the Zionist-controlled media is more than happy to espouse the libertarian message: more power for Zionist billionaires; less power for any government that seeks to control and regulate Zionist banks and interests. All supporters of libertarianism are, whether they know it or not, serving the agenda of the Zionist super rich against the interests of the people.

Libertarianism is the real mechanism by which the Old World Order hope to seize global control. Libertarianism goes hand in hand with unregulated globalisation: reducing the world’s population to serfdom and slavery in service of the Old Masters – the Old World Order.

Everyone who supports Hayek, Rand, Friedman, and libertarianism is an enemy of the people. Libertarianism is a codeword for racism, Zionism, and ultra capitalism. All supporters of the Old World Order subscribe to it.

The libertarians of extreme right wing, racist organisations such as the Tea Party are the shock troops of the OWO, their foot soldiers and water carriers. They are the storm troopers of fascist rule by the Power Elite. We welcome the condemnation of such vile people; if they supported us in any way we would know we were doing something disastrously wrong.

The 9/11 “conspiracy” is the ultimate McGuffin – it’s nothing at all. There’s nothing there. It’s a red herring. Its function, though, is very real. It drives a secondary plot and an entirely different narrative. Its true purpose is to undermine the basis of government – any government, government in principle – and to “reveal” all government as a lethal threat to the people, as an eternal conspiracy.

The “Truthers” are anarcho-capitalist libertarians who want to destroy government. They are engaged in a massive and frighteningly dangerous conspiracy to kill government and replace it with enormous corporations acting according to the “market”, and outside any government control or restraint.

In this nightmarish new world, people would be brainwashed drones and droids “owned” by corporate leviathans. There would be no freedom, no hope and no escape. Wake up. See what’s really going on. See past the smoke and mirrors.

Ask yourself that ancient question – cui bono? Who will benefit most from the Truthers’ new model of society? The answer is the same one it has always been: big business, the entrenched elite, the privileged few, the men behind the curtain; in short, the Old World Order. It’s the oldest story ever told. Will we go on being suckers forever? Wake up!
__________

The 9/11 Paradigm:

The 9/11 conspiracy theories should be reclassified as a religion, or, better still, as a mental illness. A person keeps sending web links to us in which various anti-Zionists provide “irrefutable evidence” that Zionists were responsible for 9/11. See, for example:

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/soci…/sociopol_911zion.htm

Of course, their “evidence” is always laughable and just reveals how crazy and irrational they are. There is literally nothing that could persuade the “Truthers” to change their mind and accept the selfevident facts.

9/11 is astoundingly simple. Only one thing needs to be known: that four American planes were hijacked and used as suicide bombs by their hijackers. Everything that happened subsequently flowed from that incontestable fact, the sine qua non for everything else. So, who would hijack an American plane and then be willing to give his life to use it as a weapon of war against prominent American targets, resulting in indefinite numbers of innocent Americans being slaughtered? Obviously, it would be an agent of Mossad or the CIA!

After all, they’re famous for their suicide hijacking operations and desire for martyrdom. The CIA and Mossad are notorious despisers of American civilians, and are only too keen to massacre them in vast numbers. They’ve long harboured a pathological hatred of America. Or have I gone fucking insane?!!!

Without any conceivable question, 9/11 was carried out by 19 of the legions of Muslim maniacs who detest America, and who love suicide operations as the martyr’s fast track to paradise. Probably ten thousand Muslims have participated in suicide operations over the years. Number of CIA or Mossad agents who have taken part in suicide operations? – ZERO!

All of the hijackers were identified. They were all well-known Muslim fanatics who attended jihadist training camps in Afghanistan. Air stewardesses on the planes (all of whom died) used onboard phones to say exactly what was happening and who was doing it (they gave the seat numbers of the hijackers).

The heavily accented voices of the hijackers in the cockpits were recorded. Flight 93 was brought down because of a passenger uprising. The passengers were fully aware of what had happened to the other planes because their family and friends on the ground were telling them in phone calls. The Flight 93 passengers were not trying to attack suicidal Mossad or CIA agents, but Muslim fanatics wearing red martyrdom bandanas around their heads. The Muslim hijacker pilots had all attended American flying schools in the previous months. That’s exactly what you would expect as part of an elaborate CIA and Mossad suicide plot, isn’t it? In 1993, in another well-known CIA/Mossad plot, a van bomb was used to try to blow up the Twin Towers. Or was it another bunch of Muslim maniacs who were responsible?

In 1994, the CIA/Mossad hijacked a plane in Algeria, intending to crash it into the heart of Paris. French Special Forces killed these CIA/Mossad agents. Or was it in fact another gang of Muslim crazies that got gunned down?

The London bombing and the Madrid bombing – obviously carried out by the CIA, Mossad and the British and Spanish Intelligence services and not by Muslim psychopaths who left martyrdom videos bragging about what they had done and giving warning of more attacks to come. The many terrorist attacks against Russia – Mossad, the CIA and the Russian intelligence service were self-evidently the guilty parties and not the hordes of Muslims who despise Russian rule and have been waging war against Russia for decades.

There are certain incontrovertible facts: Muslims love peace and never harm anyone; no Muslim has ever taken part in a suicide operation; no Muslim has ever hijacked a plane; no Muslim has ever hated the Americans or Europeans; no Muslim has ever targeted the twin Towers. Anyone who says that Muslims carried out 9/11 is clearly a member of Mossad or the CIA. Muslims love the West.

At least that’s what the demented Truthers think. Our correspondent talks about the “truth”. Not that he cares what it is. Like many people, he knows what the conclusion is that he desires, and nothing as inconvenient as a fact will dissuade him from marching straight to that conclusion. He will hunt high and low for material to support his delusion, and ignore everything that contradicts it. This is the trademark way that Christians, Jews, Muslims, Creationists etc operate. These are “Mythos” (story) people who have never been troubled by rational Logos thinking. Actually, they’re not capable of exhibiting reason or logic. They are locked into feelings and sensations. They have their 9/11 paradigm that shapes how they understand the world, and they will never abandon it. They can’t. It has become part of their identity.

We are opposed to Zionism, the State of Israel, American support for Zionism and Israel, and the Zionist lobby in America. Yet we will not stoop to accusing Zionists of crimes they didn’t commit when the guilty parties have been caught red-handed.

To the person who keeps writing to us – why don’t you join Al Qaeda? Don’t visit our site again. Go and plague someone else with your conspiracy theories. For two thousand years and more, Abrahamists have bought into irrational garbage. Two thousand years from now the Religion of 9/11 will still be going strong. Why? Because the earth is a mental asylum, full of people unable to think rationally.

Muslim maniacs and their fellow travellers have claimed that the Madrid bombing was ordered by the Spanish government and the London bombing by the British government. Why should anyone be surprised that they blamed the Zionists and Americans for 9/11? It’s what they do – blame others – and there are always credulous fools willing to believe them because they have their own axe to grind. There are hundreds of Muslims in jails all over Europe, all caught plotting acts of horrific violence against the West. Only the most deluded people on earth would imagine that Western governments fabricated all of this. Go to a radicalised mosque and you will hear imams calling for all infidels to be killed and for all good Muslims to martyr themselves in a global jihad. Are these secret CIA and Mossad imams? Get fucking real.

9/11 was one act amongst a whole campaign of Islamic jihadist terrorism that has been going on for decades in scores of countries. Only people who don’t have a clue about the history of jihadism could imagine that 9/11 couldn’t possibly have been done by jihadists. It’s ALL they’ve been doing for decades.

Anyone who says that 9/11 was perpetrated by Zionists and Americans is a friend and ally of Al Qaeda, Islamic jihad, and global Sharia Law. Zionists and the American government are guilty of innumerable crimes. 9/11 isn’t one of them.

Go to YouTube and have a look at the martyrdom video of Shehzad Tanweer – “CIA/Mossad Agent” (according to the logic of 9/11 conspiracy theorists) who murdered seven innocent people in a suicide bomb attack on London Underground on 7/7/2005. THAT’s the enemy, not the CIA.

During the Cold War, the Americans chose to help the Afghani jihadists – the future Taliban – against the Soviets. Once allies, the Americans and Taliban are now the bitterest of enemies. Donald Rumsfeld was famously pictured shaking hands with Saddam Hussein, and America gave massive aid to Iraq during its war with Iran (another hated enemy of America). So, according to conspiracy theory logic, Saddam Hussein was a CIA agent! Therefore, Saddam Hussein participated in the 9/11 conspiracy even though it resulted in his overthrow and death!

Don’t laugh – that’s the level of rationality the conspiracy theorists operate at. They look for any compromising photographs, snippets of information, hearsay, rumours, coincidences etc. and build them into an enormous edifice that contains so much data that it might seem impressive on first glance. On second glance, it’s like the Ptolemaic model of the solar system – extremely complicated and utter nonsense.

And never forget this: not a single particle of evidence has ever inked Iraq to 9/11. So, this “brilliant” conspiracy, whose purpose was llegedly to allow America to justify an invasion of Iraq to grab its oil and provide regional support for Israel, did not fulfil even its first bjective – to attribute blame for 9/11 to the nation about to be attacked. Was this the most inept conspiracy in history? Or are theconspiracy theorists who advocate this “conspiracy” the most retarded in history?

The Cabinet Meeting that gave the go-ahead for 9/11

Just consider for a moment that you’re sitting around the Cabinet table of the Israeli Government in 2001. You’re having to decide whether to use Mossad to attack your greatest friend, ally, supporter and funder – America. You will be killing thousands of American citizens. If you are caught, America will not only have to withdraw all support and friendship from you but actually declare war on you. It would mean the end of Israel, the treasure you have protected with such determination for so long. Israel will revert to Palestine once more, and the Jews will never get it back again. And it will be your fault.

You will surely go to hell. Yahweh will declare that the Jews broke the sacred Covenant and brought this fate upon themselves. In a couple of centuries, there will be no Jews left on earth. And all because you madly chose to attack your great benefactor and friend, America, in the most cold-blooded and treacherous way imaginable. And why are you contemplating this insane step? Well, because you want America to attack Iraq. The plan is to covertly attack America while pretending that responsibility lay with Al Qaeda or Iraq (who cares? – they’re all ragheads!), thus creating the excuse for war on Iraq.

According to some scenarios, the American government will actually be helping you to attack their own country – the biggest act of treason in human history. Both you and the Americans have to pray that nothing goes wrong and nothing leaks (may God curse WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, Bradley Manning and all those inclined to spill the beans!). If it does, the governments of Israel and America are both toast – they will be executed for high treason, and Israel will cease to exist.

“And remind us again of why we’re taking the biggest, riskiest and most treacherous gamble in the history of the world, one that will stand as an eternal act of infamy,” say the Israeli Prime Minister and the American President to their advisers as they get ready to give the go-ahead for the diabolical plot. “Because we want a war in Iraq?”

Aren’t there any easier ways, guys? And we have to find 19 Mossad and CIA agents who can be plausibly passed off as Islamic terrorists, and moreover, we need them all to agree to murder thousands of Americans and also commit suicide? Apart from that, we have to rig the Twin Towers for demolition, to take place not when the planes strike but some time later. We also have to demolish some towers that didn’t even get hit by planes! We have to fire a missile at the Pentagon, and then shoot down one of the four planes that we ourselves hijacked. We also have to close down the whole of American airspace. Isn’t that all going to be a bit of a stretch? Then we have to arrange the biggest cover-up in history, involving thousands of people, any one of whom could talk and blow the whole thing? Hmmmmm. I’ll tell you what, guys – you’re all fired!!!!!”

You would have to be literally deranged to believe that the American and Israeli governments ordered Mossad and the CIA to find 19 suicide agents to kill 3,000 Americans, thus creating an excuse for war with Iraq, which wasn’t even implicated in 9/11.

What’s the alternative? 19 Islamic Jihadists working for Al Qaeda, an organization that loathes pro-Zionist America and has attacked American targets all over the world for many years, hijacked four American planes and used them to perform spectacular “martyrdom” operations against the Great Satan. Allahu Akbar!!!

So, which option do you choose? Are you sane or insane? Anyone who continues to say that the governments of Israel and America perpetrated the most heinous act of treason in history for the extremely modest “prize” of war with Iraq is quite simply demented and beyond help. Not one shred of credible evidence has ever been advanced to support the mad hypothesis. No conspiracy theorist has ever explained who the Israeli and CIA agents were who were willing to kill Americans and themselves for the sake of the “plan”. Some have suggested that the planes were flown by remote control (!), thus ignoring all of the evidence from all of the planes, particularly Flight 93, that Muslim hijackers had violently seized the planes and killed passengers with box cutters. All of the hijackers were identified. They were all known jihadists. What the fuck is there to be suspicious about? If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s a duck.

Which two countries do all jihadists loathe? – America and Israel. You think the jihadists weren’t motivated to carry out 9/11? You think the thousands of acts of Islamic terrorism are all covert CIA and Mossad operations to discredit nice, peaceful Muslims who would never hurt a fly? What fucking planet are you living on?!

If you, like George W Bush and his senior Cabinet colleagues, were an extremely wealthy person enjoying the finest life imaginable, would you court disaster, infamy and the death penalty by ordering a covert attack on your own country and fellow citizens – just to create a pretext for attacking foreign countries that have oil you covet? Your fate would be entirely in the hands of the hundreds and thousands of people who would need to be involved in such a mammoth undertaking as 9/11 (if viewed as a Western conspiracy): the White House, Pentagon, Air Traffic Control, the media, CIA, FBI, Mossad, all those involved in the planning of the alleged demolition of the Twin Towers and other buildings, those who allegedly fired a missile at the Pentagon, NYPD and emergency services, Washington police and emergency services etc – any one of who could have blown the whole deal and squealed, with deadly consequences for you and your family.

The truth is that 9/11 conspiracy theorists are nuts who buy into a vision where George W Bush and his confederates aren’t even human. Rather, they are pan-dimensional lizard humans from another world: they despise humanity and they would never breathe a word of the conspiracy because they’re all Reptilians! That’s the only way to make their conspiracy work. Then it becomes airtight (!). The hijackers can become shape-shifting creatures that escaped from the planes into another dimension before the collisions took place. Ah, now it all makes perfect sense!!!

So, was 9/11 carried out by Islamic maniacs using the modus operandi characteristic of Islamic jihadist terrorists for several decades, or was it carried out by alien Reptilians? That’s your choice. And then people wonder why we call “Truthers” crazy! Some people have suggested we should form an alliance of convenience with “Truthers”. You must be joking!
__________

5/9

First off, we should say that all of the junk and complete nonsense we are about to wade through has already been comprehensively debunked at sites such as: www.911myths.com

Clearly, the person who sent us this list has no interest in researching any of the 9/11 debunking sites. There are many websites claiming 9/11 was an inside job and just as many debunking those websites. Our correspondent is the sort of person who avidly reads the “inside job” sites and completely ignores the others. He lives in a fantasy land, not realising that all of the “definitive” evidence he reads about so eagerly has already been totally discredited and rejected.

By and large, we will not be offering the answers to the fifty questions since that has been done exhaustively elsewhere. Instead, we will be concentrating on how moronic these questions are and we will be considering the mentality of the person who compiled the list and those people, like our correspondent, who are taken in by this gibberish. We will adopt a tone of mockery since how else can you show your contempt for the ranting and raving of the lunatics and madmen who have long since departed the rational world.
__________

Fifty questions:

1) How come dead or not dead Osama bin Laden has not been formally indicted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as responsible for 9/11? Is it because the US government – as acknowledged by the FBI itself – has not produced a single conclusive piece of evidence?

That’s because the DBC (the “dastardly and brilliant conspirators”) know that Bin Laden didn’t do it – because THEY did! America has spent billions on pursuing Bin Laden as a complete smokescreen, and they have brilliantly made sure they never actually captured him, because that would prove disastrous. He would expose the whole sordid conspiracy. In fact, he’s actually in the protective custody of the CIA in a special Witness Protection Scheme for “Guilty Men who are not Guilty!”

America has imprisoned hundreds of Muslims in Guantanamo Bay for years. Astoundingly, not one of them has been formally indicted by the FBI. Is that because America doesn’t have a single conclusive piece of evidence against them? Or is because America has chosen to treat them as “unlawful enemy combatants” (denied the right of legal prisoners of war) in an ongoing terrorist war and is detaining them indefinitely as permanently dangerous combatants rather than as people to be processed by the American criminal justice system?

(Note: as of May, 2011, Al Qaeda acknowledged that the Americans successfully assassinated Bin Laden in Pakistan.)

2) How could all the alleged 19 razor-blade box cutter-equipped Muslim perpetrators have been identified in less than 72 hours – without even a crime scene investigation?

What?! It took the DBC that long? But surely the DBC had all of the details of the conspirators already – after all, they picked them!

In fact, all of the perpetrators were identified DURING the hijackings – the air stewardesses used the phones on the planes to provide the seat numbers of the hijackers to the authorities. Who the fuck needs a crime scene? Jack Ruby was identified within seconds of assassinating Lee Harvey Oswald. No one had carried out the required crime scene investigation!!! Unacceptable!

3) How come none of the 19’s names appeared on the passenger lists released the same day by both United Airlines and American Airlines?

Er, on the one hand it’s being suggested that the perpetrators were conveniently identified by the DBC within 72 hours without a crime scene investigation; now it’s being asserted that the DBC were so dumb that they hadn’t even worked out who they were going to finger for the crime, hence inserted the names afterwards. Are these the dumbest conspirators in history? They didn’t have their stooges and patsies ready to take the blame. This, of course, is the first thing to which conspirators attend. You must have someone to blame – that’s the whole point of the conspiracy.

In fact, because the hijackers were fully known, they were deliberately excluded from the passenger lists because they were murderers, not passengers. An entirely appropriate step to take, wouldn’t you say? The 7/7 bombers in London aren’t listed amongst the dead for exactly the same reason.

4) How come eight names on the “original” FBI list happened to be found alive and living in different countries?

How many John Smiths are in the world? How many people use fake identities? How many fake passports are in the world?

5) Why would pious jihadi Mohammed Atta leave a how-to-fly video manual, a uniform and his last will inside his bag knowing he was on a suicide mission?

Eh?!! Is he supposed to leave his last will in his hotel room for the cleaners to find?

Atta’s bags did not make it onto Flight 11 because his earlier flight from Portland was delayed. They were found later at Logan International Airport, containing his hijacking kit, including an airline uniform and flight manuals.

Most conspiracy theorists choose to say that the bag was obviously planted. And what does “pious” have to do with anything? The question is a non sequitur.

6) Why did Mohammed Atta study flight simulation at Opa Locka, a hub of no less than six US Navy training bases?

Because he was a DBC agent!!! Of course, if the DBC were smart, they would have made sure he trained anywhere else in the utmost secrecy. But these are evidently the dumbest conspirators in history!

7) How could Mohammed Atta’s passport have been magically found buried among the Word Trade Center (WTC)’s debris when not a single flight recorder was found?

Because the DBC ludicrously planted it there!!!! Actually, wasn’t it some other hijacker’s passport rather than Atta’s (namely Satam Al Suqami?) Come on, get your facts straight!

8) Who is in the possession of the “disappeared” eight indestructible black boxes on those four flights?

The DBC! Or perhaps the claim that black boxes are indestructible only applies to normal crash conditions. The Titanic was described as “unsinkable”. We all know how that turned out!

9) Considering multiple international red alerts about a possible terrorist attack inside the US – including former secretary of state Condoleezza Rice’s infamous August 6, 2001, memo – how come four hijacked planes deviating from their computerized flight paths and disappearing from radar are allowed to fly around US airspace for more than an hour and a half – not to mention disabling all the elaborate Pentagon’s defense systems in the process?

Because the DBC were in control of the whole of American airspace and all American air controllers were in on the conspiracy and should immediately be arrested and indicted by the FBI!!

The suggestion being made here is that America should be geared up for shooting down commercial airliners full of hundreds of people within seconds of any route deviation. Just imagine that on 9/11 American fighter planes were scrambled within minutes and shot down ten planes (because many planes deviated from their prescribed routes that day), six of which didn’t have any hijackers onboard. That would have played well, wouldn’t it?

On 9/11, no one in America associated hijacking with suicide missions. Only an insane person would expect hijacked planes, or planes behaving erratically, to be routinely shot out of the sky over American cities. Even now, would anyone shoot a plane out of the sky over a city? – you would cause much more damage than letting it crash in one location. Debris would rain down all over the city causing fires, death and destruction everywhere.

10) Why the secretary of the US Air Force James Roche did not try to intercept both planes hitting the WTC (only seven minutes away from McGuire Air Force Base in New Jersey) as well as the Pentagon (only 10 minutes away from McGuire)? Roche had no less than 75 minutes to respond to the plane hitting the Pentagon.

Because he’s a member of the DBC! Or perhaps it’s because it wasn’t his job to be intercepting commercial airliners and shooting them down and you need the highest possible authorisation to start doing things like that. Or is America a military dictatorship?

11) Why did George W Bush continue to recite “My Pet Goat” in his Florida school and was not instantly absconded by the secret service?

“Abscond” – to run away secretly to avoid prosecution or punishment! Isn’t that putting the cart before the horse? Don’t you mean “extracted”?

Because he’s a member of the DBC! What better alibi?! Given that he was fully in on it, shouldn’t Bush be awarded an Oscar for looking like a gormless clown who didn’t know what the fuck was going on, and seemed utterly paralysed with indecision?

12) How could Bush have seen the first plane crashing on WTC live – as he admitted? Did he have previous knowledge – or is he psychic?

Both! He’s a pan-dimensional Reptilian shape-shifter. Also, the Florida school has a hook-up to the DBC’s live channel showing dastardly deeds!!! Apparently, the children were shocked to have been dragged into the dark secret and then forced to stay silent afterwards!

13) Bush said that he and Andrew Card initially thought the first hit on the WTC was an accident with a small plane. How is that possible when the FAA as well as NORAD already knew this was about a hijacked plane?

All over the world, it was reported that a light aircraft had crashed into the Twin Towers. A light aircraft crash was a comprehensible scenario; a hijacked commercial aircraft on a suicide mission was not.

The FAA and NORAD had no expectation that a hijacked plane would deliberately crash. No one would call it a terrorist event without a “crime scene investigation” i.e. doing things by the book.

The cretin who made up these questions wants, on the one hand, everything to be done according to standard procedure, and then on the other to be done according to unique procedures invented on the spot by people without any authority.

14) What are the odds of transponders in four different planes being turned off almost simultaneously, in the same geographical area, very close to the nation’s seat of power in Washington, and no one scrambles to contact the Pentagon or the media?

So, it has always been standard procedure in America for air traffic controllers to get onto the media to inform them about all strange happenings in airspace? Yeah, right? Should all American employees have a hotline to the media and the Pentagon, and instead of getting on with their jobs in a crisis they should have a chat with the media and the Pentagon instead?

WTF!

Imagine the conversation to the Pentagon: “Four transponders have been switched off. We have no further information so I want you to start searching the skies for these planes and then blasting commercial aircraft with hundreds of passengers onboard out of the sky.” Yeah, right!

15) Could defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld explain why initial media reports said that there were no fighter jets available at Andrews Air Force Base and then change the reports that there were, but not on high alert?

Because he was feeding false data to the media because he was a member of the DBC!!!

In London on 7/7, emergency services attending one of the bombings were accidentally sent to the wrong place because of confusion over the address. In any crisis, things go wrong and confusion reigns.

16) Why was the DC Air National Guard in Washington AWOL on 9/11?

They were all in on it! The DBC told them to do nothing. Or maybe they, like most other people, had no idea what was going on, and no orders.

17) Why did combat jet fighters of the 305th Air Wing, McGuire Air Force Base in New Jersey not intercept the second hijacked plane hitting the WTC, when they could have done it within seven minutes?

Yes, if they had known what we all know now. They didn’t know it at the time. There’s a useful phrase – the “Fog of War” – that’s used to describe the incredible confusion that often reigns during battles. Generals like to say that their battle plan is out of date the moment a battle begins. (“No plan survives contact with the enemy.” –Field-Marshal Helmuth von Moltke.)

It’s remarkable how the Conspiracy Theorists judge everything with perfect hindsight and have a touching belief in the infallibility of all government and military institutions. Did the Americans attack themselves at Pearl Harbor as part of a cunning plan to draw Japan into war? How else to explain the complete incompetence of the Americans on 7 December 1941?

18) Why did none of the combat jet fighters of the 459th Aircraft Squadron at Andrews Air Force Base intercept the plane that hit the Pentagon, only 16 kilometres away? And since we’re at it, why did the Pentagon did not release the full video of the hit?

Because someone needs to give the appropriate orders, and the Air Force commanders didn’t have the vaguest idea what was going on. There were all sorts of reports of transponders being switched off. No one knew for sure how many hijacked planes there were, and where they were.

The video? There wasn’t much to see!

19) A number of very experienced airline pilots – including US ally Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, a former fighter jet pilot – revealed that, well, only crack pilots could have performed such complex manoeuvres on the hijacked jets, while others insisted they could only have been accomplished by remote control. Is it remotely believable that the hijackers were up to the task?

The ringleader of the terrorists was an Egyptian – so the first person you would go to for impartial expertise would be the hated dictator of Egypt!

The autopilot on modern aircraft is so good that they can fly themselves. Pilots are there only for safety reasons. The job of a pilot is much less complex than you would imagine – and since when did Mubarak fly a modern airliner?!

20) How come a substantial number of witnesses did swear seeing and hearing multiple explosions in both towers of the WTC? What kind of explosions? All sorts of equipment within the WTC would have exploded due to the intense heat and fires.

As for the reliability of witnesses, try studying Psychology 101 and you’ll discover that witnesses are rarely to be trusted. Most are in shock, are in a highly suggestible state, and are hypersensitive to all manner of sensations and hallucinations.

21) How come a substantial number of reputed architects and engineers are adamant that the official narrative simply does not explain the largest structural collapse in recorded history (the Twin Towers) as well as the collapse of WTC building 7, which was not even hit by a jet?

How come a number of reputed scientists deny the reality of global warming while a much larger number ridicule the deniers?

A huge amount of debris fell on WTC 7, and it was blazing with many internal fires. You can check it out on YouTube.

22) According to Frank de Martini, WTC’s construction manager, “We designed the building to resist the impact of one or more jetliners.” The second plane nearly missed tower 1; most of the fuel burned in an explosion outside the tower. Yet this tower collapsed first, long before tower 2 that was “perforated” by the first hit. Jet fuel burned up fast – and by far did not reach the 2000-degree heat necessary to hurt the six tubular steel columns in the center of the tower – designed specifically to keep the towers from collapsing even if hit by a Boeing 707. A Boeing 707 used to carry more fuel than the Boeing 757 and Boeing 767 that actually hit the towers.

Designer of Titanic – “We have designed it to be unsinkable.” It’s touching how many non-engineers regard engineers as infallible. The Shuttle disasters? – “infallible” engineers again.

Everyone knows that the second plane hit at a lower level. Imagine that the planes had managed to strike the base levels of the Towers – the structures would have collapsed within minutes. It’s the incredible weight pressing down on any weak spot that leads to structural collapse. There was much more weight on the Tower 1 “weak zone” than the Tower 2 equivalent because the impact took place at a lower level.

From the official report: “The report concluded that the fireproofing on the Twin Towers’ steel infrastructures was blown off by the initial impact of the planes and that, if this had not occurred, the towers would likely have remained standing. This was confirmed by an independent study by Purdue University.” But they’re all in on it of course!

23) Why did Mayor Rudolph Giuliani instantly authorized the shipment of WTC rubble to China and India for recycling? Because he was on it and wanted to give the incriminating evidence to the Chinese and the Indians so that they could blackmail the conspirators!

24) Why was metallic debris found no less than 13 kilometres from the crash site of the plane that went down in Pennsylvania? Was the plane in fact shot down – under vice president Dick Cheney’s orders?

Eh?! Wasn’t Dick Cheney in on the conspiracy? So why would he order the plane to be shot down? Wouldn’t that constitute ABSOLUTE PROOF that the American government wasn’t responsible for 9/11?!

In their eagerness to stir as much shit as they can find, these dumb fuck Conspiracy Theorists have destroyed their own conspiracy theory. One second, 9/11 was an inside job. Next second, Cheney is ordering the hijacked planes to be blasted out of the sky! Talk about having your cake and eating it! On the one hand, Cheney is being accused of being part of the 9/11 conspiracy; on the other, he is being accused of a totally different conspiracy – covering up the shooting down of Flight 93! Jesus – that bastard can’t win.

The Conspiracy Theorists simply use a scattergun gun approach and hope that something sticks. They are the most intellectually dishonest people on earth. They are malicious troublemakers. “Truthers?” They are the biggest liars on earth!

25) The Pipelineistan question. What did US ambassador Wendy Chamberlain talk about over the phone on October 10, 2001, with the oil minister of Pakistan? Was it to tell him that the 1990s planned Unocal gas pipeline project, TAP (Turkmenistan/Afghanistan/ Pakistan), abandoned because of Taliban demands on transit fees, was now back in business? (Two months later, an agreement to build the pipeline was signed between the leaders of the three countries).

Yes, exactly right!! And so what? Is the suggestion seriously being made that the American government perpetrated the most heinous act of treason in history just so that a pipeline could be built that had been blocked by the Taliban? WTF!!

26) What is former Unocal lobbyist and former Bush pet Afghan Zalmay Khalilzad up to in Afghanistan?

Who cares?! Maybe he’s working on the pipeline project! Does that mean he was in on 9/11 and should be executed?!

27) How come former Pakistani foreign minister Niaz Niak said in mid-July 2001 that the US had already decided to strike against Osama bin Laden and the Taliban by October? The topic was discussed secretly at the July Group of Eight summit in Genoa, Italy, according to Pakistani diplomats.

Wouldn’t that be rather logical? He had been on their hitlist for some time. If they had moved a month earlier they might have stopped 9/11!! But, according to this scenario, Bin Laden clearly wasn’t a CIA agent, yet many Conspiracy Theorists have suggested he was.

28) How come US ambassador to Yemen Barbara Bodine told FBI agent John O’Neill in July 2001 to stop investigating al-Qaeda’s financial operations – with O’Neill instantly moved to a security job at the WTC, where he died on 9/11?

This is ridiculous. An ambassador to Yemen has no authority to give orders to FBI agents. Are we supposed to believe that the US ambassador to Yemen let it be known that she had interfered in an FBI investigation and then arranged for an agent to be assassinated as part of the 9/11 conspiracy? WTF!

29) Considering the very intimate relationship between the Taliban and Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), and the ISI and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), is Bin Laden alive, dead or still a valuable asset of the ISI, the CIA or both?

According to 27) Pakistan was aware that America wanted to kill Bin Laden. Now it’s being suggested that he was an ISI and/or CIA agent. Make your fucking mind up! This is the most ridiculous conspiracy theory in history, contradicting itself at every turn. (Note: as we now know, Bin Laden is definitively dead.)

30) Was Bin Laden admitted at the American hospital in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates on July 4, 2001, after flying from Quetta, Pakistan, and staying for treatment until July 11?

Yes, America’s “Most Wanted” often use that hospital! WTF!!!

31) Did the Bin Laden group build the caves of Tora Bora in close cooperation with the CIA during the 1980s’ anti-Soviet jihad?

So what? The CIA were actively helping the anti-Soviet jihad. Everyone knows that.

32) How come General Tommy Franks knew for sure that Bin Laden was hiding in Tora Bora in late November 2001?

Because his intelligence officers told him, perhaps? Would you prefer that Franks didn’t have a clue where he was? Franks can’t win, can he?

33) Why did President Bill Clinton abort a hit on Bin Laden in October 1999? Why did then-Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf abort a covert op in the same date? And why did Musharraf do the same thing again in August 2001?

Because their plans changed! Are we back to the allegation that Bin Laden was working for the CIA? Make your mind up!

34) Why did George W Bush dissolve the Bin Laden Task Force nine months before 9/11?

So, doesn’t the existence of the bin Laden Task Force prove that he was NOT working for the CIA? Was he suddenly recruited to the CIA by Bush months before 9/11? WTF! Does he keep changing sides every few months?!

35) How come the (fake) Bin Laden home video – in which he “confesses” to being the perpetrator of 9/11 – released by the US on December 13, 2001, was found only two weeks after it was produced (on November 9); was it really found in Jalalabad (considering Northern Alliance and US troops had not even arrived there at the time); by whom; and how come the Pentagon was forced to release a new translation after the first (botched) one?

Is it being alleged that the tape was fake, or simply that the translation wasn’t accurate? Doesn’t America have an intelligence network whose job is to find out secret information long before troops show up? Or is America totally clueless despite spending billions on its intelligence services. Which is it?

36) Why was ISI chief Lieutenant General Mahmud Ahmad abruptly “retired” on October 8, 2001, the day the US started bombing Afghanistan?

Because he was suspected of being a friend of the Taliban, perhaps?! Wouldn’t that be the logical action to take? Even now, the ISI are suspected of being riddled with Taliban sympathisers.

37) What was Ahmad up to in Washington exactly on the week of 9/11 (he arrived on September 4)? On the morning of 9/11, Ahmad was having breakfast on Capitol Hill with Bob Graham and Porter Goss, both later part of the 9/11 Commission, which simply refused to investigate two of its members. Ahmad had breakfast with Richard Armitage of the State Department on September 12 and 13 (when Pakistan negotiated its “cooperation” with the “war on terror”) and met all the CIA and Pentagon top brass. On September 13, Musharraf announced he would send Ahmad to Afghanistan to demand to the Taliban the extradition of Bin Laden.

Wasn’t it stated by this cretin in Q.27 that America and Pakistan were planning a strike on Bin Laden within weeks. So, that’s why he was there, you dumb fuck.

38) Who inside the ISI transferred US$100,000 to Mohammed Atta in the summer of 2001 – under orders of Ahmad himself, as Indian intelligence insists? Was it really ISI asset Omar Sheikh, Bin Laden’s information technology specialist who later organized the slaying of American journalist Daniel Pearl in Karachi? So was the ISI directly linked to 9/11?

Yes. The ISI were, and still are, totally infiltrated by Islamists.

39) Did the FBI investigate the two shady characters who met Mohammed Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi in Harry’s Bar at the Helmsley Hotel in New York City on September 8, 2001?

Yes.

40) What did director of Asian affairs at the State Department Christina Rocca and the Taliban ambassador to Pakistan Abdul Salam Zaeef discuss in their meeting in Islamabad in August 2001?

The weather? Why wouldn’t the director of Asian affairs talk to a Taliban ambassador? Isn’t that her job?

41) Did Washington know in advance that an “al-Qaeda” connection would kill Afghan nationalist commander Ahmad Shah Massoud, aka “The Lion of the Panjshir”, only two days before 9/11? Massoud was fighting the Taliban and al-Qaeda – helped by Russia and Iran. According to the Northern Alliance, Massoud was killed by an ISI-Taliban-al Qaeda axis. If still alive, he would never have allowed the US to rig a loya jirga (grand council) in Afghanistan and install a puppet, former CIA asset Hamid Karzai, as leader of the country.

America had been relying on Massoud to take the fight to the Taliban. His assassination was acknowledged at the time as a major blow to American interests. America would have been perfectly happy with Massoud as the leader of Afghanistan.

42) Why did it take no less than four months before the name of Ramzi Binalshibh surfaced in the 9/11 context, considering the Yemeni was a roommate of Mohammed Atta in his apartment cell in Hamburg?

All the associates of Atta were identified extremely quickly. What is the suggestion being made here? That the intelligence services are inept, or that some cover up is going on? It’s baffling trying to keep up with this alleged conspiracy.

43) Is pathetic shoe-bomber Richard Reid an ISI asset? Well, he was certainly pathetic. Are we now switching our attention to the ISI? Were they responsible for 9/11 rather than Mossad and the CIA?

44) Did then-Russian president Vladimir Putin and Russian intelligence tell the CIA in 2001 that 25 terrorist pilots had been training for suicide missions?

The most serious allegation that can be levelled against the American government is that they knew something was imminent and, in effect, allowed it to happen. We have described it as an act of omission rather than commission. It suited their foreign policy objectives to allow a major attack to take place – which is an extremely different claim from the one that they committed the act themselves.

Also, note that this point is indicating that the Russians were giving the CIA vital intelligence about a forthcoming Islamic martyrdom operation. Of course, according to the conspiracy theory, the CIA and Mossad – not Al Qaeda – were behind 9/11…so were the CIA in fact feeding false information to the Russians!

Aha!!

45) When did the head of German intelligence, August Hanning, tell the CIA that terrorists were “planning to hijack commercial aircraft?”

See 44).

If the CIA and Mossad were behind 9/11, they were evidently extremely inept at keeping their plan secret. Apparently everyone knew about it. Or were Mossad and the CIA engaged in a dastardly campaign of misinformation and disinformation?

Aha!!!

46) When did Egyptian President Mubarak tell the CIA about an attack on the US with an “airplane stuffed with explosives?”

See 44).

47) When did Israel’s Mossad director Efraim Halevy tell the CIA about a possible attack on the US by “200 terrorists?”

See 44). Hold on – weren’t Mossad involved with the CIA in the 9/11 conspiracy? Did they tell the CIA about their own joint conspiracy?

WTF!

48) Were the Taliban aware of the warning by a Bush administration official as early as February 2001 – “Either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs?”

And why wouldn’t America want to attack the Taliban given that they were hosting terrorist training camps?

49) Has Northrop-Grumman used Global Hawk technology – which allows to remotely control unmanned planes – in the war in Afghanistan since October 2001? Did it install Global Hawk in a commercial plane? Is Global Hawk available at all for commercial planes?

Aha, the remote-controlled-plane theory rears its head!!! So why did Cheney allegedly shoot down Flight 93 if it was a remote-controlled plane of the Zionist-American conspiracy? So, all the phone calls from the soon-to-be-dead passengers on the planes were faked? There were no hijackers, and it was all just made up? Suicidal fake pilots and aircrew were on the planes? Or maybe there were no passengers on the planes and all of their grieving relatives are liars and evil conspirators. Maybe all of the alleged victims are living in a witness protection scheme on a luxury desert island. WTF!

Just how low and desperate can this conspiracy theory get – it’s an obscene insult to all of the innocent victims of Islamic jihadism on 9/11.

50) Would Cheney stand up and volunteer the detailed timeline of what he was really up to during the whole day on 9/11?

He was obviously presiding over the most diabolical act of treason in human history, so he’ll probably take the Fifth! He was so evil that he even ordered Flight 93 – a plane that his conspirators had hijacked – to be shot down, and then he conspired to cover it up. He conspired against his own conspiracy!!!! WTF!!! THAT’s cunning!!!

******

It was suggested to us by our correspondent that these fifty questions were the “smoking gun”. As you can see for yourselves, they are ludicrous nonsense that no rational person could take seriously. Why do people waste so much time thinking up garbage? Have they got nothing better to do with their time?

We say this to the author of this collection of idiotic rubbish…So, on the one hand the planes were “remote controlled” or flown by “expert pilots” (obviously of a suicidal nature) and part of a conspiracy. On the other hand, they were being shot down by order of Dick Cheney, one of the alleged conspirators. Which is it? Can’t you make your fucking mind up? You haven’t spent even five seconds thinking through the logic of your position, such is your eagerness to apologise for Islamic maniacs who believe in a God who expects men and women to kill their own children if he commands it.

You have assembled a list of ridiculous points all of which have been addressed a hundred times over.

If you wish to believe that 9/11 was perpetrated by Mossad, the CIA and US Special Forces, that’s your prerogative. No rational argument will ever dissuade you otherwise. Why don’t you become a Muslim fanatic since that’s where your sympathies must lie?

It was suggested to us by the correspondent who sent this list that it was just “a fraction of the true story”. Well, God spare us from the rest of the shit if this is the calibre of material!

The correspondent wrote, “By the way, the best article I read about 9/11 accused the MOSSAD of masterminding the attack.”

Wow, we’re impressed! We prefer the shape-shifting lizard theory. Equally unbelievable but much more fun.

“Sorry for bothering you (one last time) with this subject though I find it of utmost importance for the society that is trying to liberate all humanity.”

The last people on earth who would represent the “liberation of humanity” are Muslims. They are slaves to Allah, Mohammed and the Koran and they would love to exterminate everyone who disagrees with them.

We can decode this statement as meaning that you have a dangerous 9/11 obsession, and you refuse to accept any evidence that contradicts your bizarre belief that super-rich American and Jews like to commit acts of high treason warranting the death penalty for no other reason than raking in a few extra bucks from foreign wars. You are a follower of the 9/11 religion, a new belief-system as cretinous and ridiculous as Abrahamism. You are insufficiently rational ever to escape from your mental illness. You ought to see a psychiatrist. There are plenty of legitimate reasons to despise the Zionist and American governments. Why would anyone need to invent excuses to loathe them?

In psychological terms, 9/11 is a projection of people’s anxieties about the way they are being governed onto a specific event that crystallizes their deepest fears about those ruling them. If only the conclusive proof could be found, they think, it would bring about the end of the tyrants.

But 9/11 is a just a distraction. We know the governments of the world are rotten to the core. We need to act now. We don’t need to waste our time chasing chimeras. Rather than becoming politically active and getting out and doing something, people spend all of their time digging up more and more nonsense about 9/11. It’s an excuse for non-action.

9/11 was a decade ago. Not one shred of credible evidence has ever linked the CIA or Mossad to the event despite tens of thousands of people dedicating every moment of their lives to uncovering every ludicrous detail, no matter how irrelevant, speculative or absurd, of 9/11 (as demonstrated by the fifty questions). The evidence that ties the event to Osama Bin Laden’s Al Qaeda is overwhelming. Why don’t people move on? Answer? – they can’t. They have “faith”. They have created a religion and now they don’t want to become heretics by admitting that it was Al Qaeda all along, just as the government said.
__________

6/9