Citiţi partea introductivă şi proiectul de Program, iar dacă vă place, veniţi cu noi !

O puteţi face clicând alături imaginea, sau acest link

## Posts Tagged ‘Ontological Mathematics’

## Abstract Zero vs Ontological Zero (∅ vs 0)

Abstract Zero vs Ontological Zero (∅ vs 0)

by Thomas Foster – hyperian

Division by Zero

(N<x> indicates N subscript x)

Empiricist scientists and abstract mathematicians deny that division by zero is possible, but that is a faith-based position and contrary to reason. Division by zero is in fact ontologically valid, and represents the interface between matter and mind.

What is zero divided by zero? Undefinable? Indeterminate? Surely we can do better than that!

Two conflicting arguments are typically advanced for 0 / 0:

[Case 1] 0 / X = 0, therefore when X = 0, 0 / 0 = 0

[Case 2] N / N = 1, therefore when N = 0, 0 / 0 = 1

This kind of arguing comes from failing to understand what zero actually is. There is in fact no discrepancy:

Case (1) is correct for abstract zero: ∅ / X does indeed give ∅ / ∅ = ∅ if X = ∅.

Case (2) is correct for ontological zero: 0<1> / N is a mathematical impossibility due to monads’ indivisibility – if N is finite but NOT if N is monadic (dimensionless).

i.e. N = 0 = 0<1>

When x = 0 is substituted into x(∞<α>) = x/0 [equation E from my previous post “Counting Infinities”] we obtain:

x(∞<α>) = x/0

0(∞<α>) = 0/0

Since 0(∞<α>) = 1,

1 = 0/0

Therefore 0 / 0 = 1.

Ontologically, this makes perfect sense:

0 / 0 = 0<1> / 0<1>

i.e. 1 monad divided by 1 monad equals 1, just as 1 / 1 = 1.

One monad ‘goes into’ one monad exactly one time.

Now, there is a caveat here – we are assuming 0 / 0 means ” 0<1> / 0<1> “.

In certain cases, in calculus for example, 0 / 0 actually represents an unknown number of monads divided by another unknown number of monads. Therefore 0 / 0 would be the equivalent of saying x / y = z; or 0<x> / 0<y> = z (x divided by y could equal anything since we don’t know what the numbers are, and therefore the result could be any number).

Otherwise, when the number of monads is known, division involving quantities of zeroes acts exactly the same as finite division (involving different quantities/multiples of 1).

Example: 0<10> / 0<5> = 2. In this case 0 (the base unit of mind) acts just the same as operations involving 1 (the base unit of matter).

What happens if you split 10 monads into 2 groups i.e. 0<10> / 2 = ?

You get 5 monads. 0<10> / 2 = 0<5>.

OBJECTIONS TO DIVISION BY ZERO:

From Wikipedia:

“With the following assumptions:”

0 * 1 = 0

0 * 2 = 0

“The following must be true:”

0 * 1 = 0 * 2 therefore 0/0 * 1 = 0/0 * 2

“Simplified, this yields:”

1 = 2

Needless to say, the initial assumptions are incorrect:

0 * 1 = 0<1> (one monad)

0 * 2 = 0<2> (two monads)

Therefore 0<1> ≠ 0<2> (One monad does not equal two monads, just as 1 does not equal 2!)

From mathforum.org:

“Division by zero is an operation for which you cannot find an answer, so it is disallowed. You can understand why if you think about how division and multiplication are related.”

12/6 = 2 because 6*2 = 12

12 / 0 = X would mean that 0 * X = 12

“But no value would work for X because 0 * X = 0. So X / 0 doesn’t work.”

Wrong!

For abstract zero, it is true that ∅ * X = ∅. (“Non-existence” is not affected by multiplication).

However 0 * X ≠ 0 (ontological zero can be multiplied, monads are COUNTABLE).

Therefore:

12 / 0 = 12(∞<α>) i.e. finite matter to dimensionless mind.

0 * 12(∞<α>) = 12 i.e. infinite monads ‘making up’ matter.

## „Dumnezeu, nu ne vrea proşti!”

The Universe Wants Us to Optimize Ourselves…

As it turns out, the mind simply is the electromagnetic spectrum, arranged as a frequency-structured singularity.

As it turns out, mathematics comes equipped with a complete explanation of how immaterial dimensionless singularities (minds) can interact with dimensional spacetime (matter). Ontological Fourier mathematics is all about how unextended frequency singularities generate, control and interact with a spacetime domain.

The universe has a mind and wants to do the best for itself. It wants to optimize itself, just as you want to optimize yourself. But you are part of the Cosmic Mind. You are one of its nodes. So, if the universe is trying to make the most of itself, that means it wants you to make the most of you, and it will do all it can to help you make the most of yourself – if, and this is the crucial point, you let it. Sadly, the average person does not.

What does Jung’s remarkable anecdote tell us? (about the scarab beetle). Basically, the universe knew what Jung and the woman were talking about, detected a nearby scarab beetle, and sent it to them, to increase the meaning of their interaction, and thus the overall meaning of the universe.

The whole mind of a human is present in every part of the human body, while the whole mind of the Cosmos (“God”) is present in every part of the physical Cosmos, hence knows exactly what is going on everywhere. In quantum mechanical terms, this is known as entanglement or non-locality. The ancient wisdom is also the basis of holography: the whole is in every part. There is nothing “woo” about this.

Just imagine that the universe is always scanning for opportunities such as this, and always striving to make them happen. However, imagine that there is also a force operating against the universe’s plan to increase meaning. This force is none other than human consciousness, which cuts us off from the universe, the macrocosm, and makes us dwell on our own little portion of the universe, the microcosm, where we are blind to the grand operations of the universe.

The optimized universe is the one where every part of the universe – all of us – are individually optimized. We all become optimized by working together to achieve exactly that, not by trying to put others down so that we can raise ourselves up.

Humanity is cut off from the truth: that we are all mind cells in one Cosmic Mind. We are Many in One, destined to cooperate with each other in the greater interest of the One (of which we are all part.}

We are all in a kind of game, a game to maximize our knowledge and experience of the game. We do so through the reduction of chaos, disorder, entropy. We manage this through cooperation, collaboration, communion, union, synthesis, integration, harmony and interconnectedness.

In fact, for everyone with eyes to see and ears to hear, synchronicity reflects the routine operations of the universe. The universe is always seeking to maximize meaning, and synchronicity is the default mechanism it uses.

Steve Madison

The Universe Has Your Back: Trust the Cosmos . Kindle Edition.

## The Reality Spheres

‘The Reality Spheres

Aristotle wrote, “We may take it that the world as a whole was not generated and cannot be destroyed, but is unique and eternal, having no beginning or end of its whole life, containing infinite time.” However, Aristotle drew a distinction between the heavenly universe and the earth. The upper heavenly spheres – made of the perfect, imperishable element of aether – are ungenerated and indestructible. They are eternal and necessary. This is the domain of being. By contrast, the lower spheres, the sublunary spheres, made of the imperfect, perishable elements of fire, air, water and earth, are temporal and contingent. They are generated rather than ungenerated. They are generated from each other and pass into each other. This is the domain of becoming. Aristotle envisaged a “steady state” universe with perfect circular motions above, and ceaseless transformations (conserved overall) below. Within this domain of becoming, Aristotle believed that a great cycle took place, temporal rather than eternal, where everything came to an end and then began again. Aristotle was not far mistaken. We can think of “God” as the eternal Fourier frequency domain, as pure, noumenal being, which equates to perfect reason. However, just as each of us dreams, so does God. All dreams are temporal, contingent, phenomenal constructs, created by eternal minds. Where we dream transient worlds, God (the collection of all monadic minds) dreams a universe, a cosmos, which takes a cosmic age to end. When the universe is created (via the Big Bang), it is pure prime matter where reason is most poorly expressed; reason is totally unconscious. Mind then starts interacting with it and it begins to evolve. It’s then on an inevitable trajectory to maximum, conscious reason. At that final point, at the end of the universe of becoming, the universe understands that it is God and exactly what that means and entails. That’s the end of the universe of becoming. Becoming now equals Being. That is then the end of that dream, and a new dream must begin via a new Big Bang. While the domain of Being stays the same forever, the domain of Becoming cycles between maximum unconscious reason and maximum conscious reason. There are three domains: eternal Being (thesis, mind), temporal Becoming (antithesis, matter) and Being-Becoming (synthesis, mind-matter). “God” inhabits the domain of eternal Being, Matter inhabits the domain of temporal Becoming, and we all inhabit the synthesis domain where mind and matter interact. Evolution means that mind gains more and more power over matter. Matter eventually disappears, leaving nothing but mind, equating to the total triumph of reason, to the total clarity and perfection of reason. “God” involves mind-mind interactions only, Matter involves matter-matter interactions only, while the Mind-Matter domain involves mind-mind, matter-matter, matter-mind and mind-matter interactions. God is the inside, Matter is the outside, while the synthesis domain involves the interaction of the inside and outside. Science studies only the Matter world (the empirical world), involving matter-matter interactions only. Mind is claimed to be nothing but a product, an emergent property, illusion or epiphenomenon of mind. Metaphysics studies pure Being (God = Pure Mind). Ontological mathematics unifies physics and mathematics, allowing the study of Mind (Being), Matter (Becoming) and Mind-Matter (Being-Becoming) and Matter-Mind (Becoming-Being). For Aristotle, matter is potentiality and mind actuality. For Leibniz, matter is unclear and mind clear. Matter is murky reason, mind is reason free of murk. The more materialist you are – the more sensory and emotional you are – the worse your reasoning. The best reasoners are the thinking intuitives because they are the freest of matter. Scientists are not great thinkers because they are too material, too empirical in their thinking. They can’t understand mathematics properly because it’s too abstract, too conceptual for them. They are empirical perceiving types, not rational judging types. Francis Bowen wrote, “The ever-rising development of consciousness, therefore, marks the drift of the current, and shows the direction in which we are hastening.” The universe is a consciousness factory. What it produces is consciousness, more and more of it. The advance of consciousness signifies the retreat of matter. Matter is what opposes consciousness (and what subject is less receptive to consciousness than scientific materialism?). Philosopher Henri Bergson said that matter was inert, and opposed by a vast, vital, living impulse: élan vital. Bergson claimed the universe has two innate tendencies: a material, entropy-generating drive to unmake itself, and a living, entropy-reducing drive to make itself. Matter is opposed to life and mind, and we see this in scientific materialism, which reduces life and mind to mere illusions, epiphenomena or emergent properties of matter. Without life and mind being fundamental to existence, existence must be meaningless, pointless and purposeless, exactly as science says. Matter does not want anything or aim for anything. It has no thoughts, no desires. It is the death force. The Second Law of thermodynamics predicts the Heat Death of the universe, also known as the “Big Freeze” or the “Big Chill” whereby the universe becomes an icy tomb, exhausted of all useful energy, where all energy is evenly distributed. This is true death. For Bergson, science can never get to the root of things. Like a surgeon performing autopsies, it can only analyze dead bodies. It can never reach life and mind, the inside of existence. Science dissects and separates the organic, living reality into dead chunks and then pronounces theories of death (matter), wholly devoid of any reference to life and mind. It is impossible for science to put any symbol into any scientific materialist equation to denote life or mind, to attribute any agency to them, or explain how they could ever come about. There is not, and never can be, any scientific equation that says: x + y = life, or a + b = mind. It is literally impossible to get to life and mind from dead, mindless matter. That’s why scientists have to talk of illusions, epiphenomena and emergence. These are all ways of describing how life and mind can appear miraculously in science – since they are not part of its mind-free, life-free paradigm of dead, meaningless, purposeless matter. Where in the Periodic Table is there any hint of life or mind? Which atoms can generate life or mind? Which property do they possess that can support life or mind? What atomic property will scientists focus on in order to explain qualia, free will, consciousness? Why is ontological mathematics so revolutionary? It’s because it takes the fundamental elements of the system – sinusoidal waves organized into monads – and designates them as the very basis of life and mind. So, wherever you see a wave, you are seeing a basis thought, hence a basis component of life. Therefore, ontological Fourier mathematics is inherently depicting mental, living processes. Because life and mind are fundamental to ontological mathematics, the whole system is about life and mind, meaning and purpose. It’s all built into the math. The equations are not equations of death and mindlessness, but of life and mind. Ontological Fourier mathematics is idealist and rationalist, not materialist and empiricist. It belongs to a wholly different paradigm from science. The equations themselves are alive because their components are alive. Stephen Hawking wrote, “Even if there is only one possible unified theory, it is just a set of rules and equations. What is it that breathes fire into the equations and makes a universe for them to describe?” The fire is already present in ontological Fourier mathematics because it deals with thoughts (basis waves) and their organization and interaction. The system is alive. The system is a thinking, self-optimizing organism. If you start with death (matter) you can never get to life and mind. You must start with life and mind. Defining the fundamental element of existence as a thought (a sinusoid) means that any operation you carry out with regard to it is automatically reflective of thinking. Scientific death (matter) never comes into it, or only as a type of thinking … matter is reduced to thought, the exact opposite of the scientific trajectory where thought and life are reduced to matter. So, never forget, life and mind can never appear in an equation unless you make the actual units you are manipulating in the equation the essence of life and mind. The biggest intellectual revolution ever was the identification of the sinusoid with thought. This means that all wave equations and wavefunctions concern thoughts, which automatically denote the presence of life and mind. Quantum mechanics – wave mechanics – is about life and mind, not death and lifelessness. That’s why science doesn’t understand quantum mechanics. And it never will. It needs to change its paradigm. If pure mind and life are the inside of reality then the deeper and smaller quantum mechanics goes, the closer it gets to life and mind, the very things that science claims don’t actually exist, and of which it has no understanding at all. To identify sinusoids as basis thoughts is to kill materialism and replace it with idealism. Since sinusoids are pure math, it also means that rationalism takes over from empiricism, with the latter relegated to a subordinate, confirmatory role, rather than the basis of the scientific method. If sinusoids are the basis of thought, and of all reality (which is therefore a giant thought, a universal thought function) then the scientific method must begin with reason and logic – with pure math – rather than with empirical observation. Reason and logic are mental activities, not physical, sensory activities. That’s why rationalism and empiricism are so opposed. Reason and logic presuppose a living, mental reality (idealism), based on the PSR as the foundational principle. Empiricism presupposes a dead, mindless reality based on observable matter, in which case it is impossible to conceive of how we could ever get to reason and logic (thinking activities) from entities that do not possess any mental activity. Everything depends on how you define the fundamental units of science, as living or dead, thinking or non-thinking. Scientific materialism chooses death and mindlessness. Ontological mathematics chooses life and mind, enshrined in sinusoidal monads, which are eternal minds. Stephen Hawking wrote, “The usual approach of science of constructing a mathematical model cannot answer the questions of why there should be a universe for the model to describe. Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?” Hawking had no conception of what mathematics is. He could not conceive of its ontology … a living, thinking ontology! No scientist can. Their paradigm precludes it. Nothing has astonished us more than the hatred scientists have towards granting an ontology to mathematics. That’s because if they ever did then there would cease to be a need for science as it is currently practiced. They would put themselves out of a job, and these careerists and functionaries would never accept that. The truth is the last thing they care about. Raymond Lindquist said, “Courage is the power to let go of the familiar.” Scientists are cowards. They never let go of the familiar. They can’t shift paradigm. Bergson denied that science was the primary source of knowledge and said intuition was more important. In fact reason and logic, leading to mathematics, are the most important, but intellectual intuition plays a vital role in getting rational and logical ideas started. For Bergson, life is always struggling against matter and this struggle leads to what he called “creative evolution.” Bergson claimed that thinking resembled the universe. Intuition draws from the life force and scientific analysis from dead matter. In fact, thought is the universe, and matter is just a type of thought. The universe is a vital, thinking, evolving, purposeful organism, a Cosmic Mind. It is not a dead, mechanical, purposeless material machine, as science once claimed, or a non-mechanical casino operating according to chance, accident, randomness, probabilities, statistics, indeterminism, indeterminacy and acausation, as science now claims. The deterministic scientific machine has been replaced by an indeterministic scientific casino based on dice throws and their probable outcomes. Science is now a completely different subject, yet doesn’t admit it is now a 100% different from how the likes of Newton conceived it, which was as a creation of an intelligent God with perfect foreknowledge. Nowadays, the “God” of science wouldn’t have a clue about the future because everything changes from one throw of the dice to the next, and no one can ever know what the outcome of a throw will be. Any throw can trigger the chaotic Butterfly Effect. Ontological mathematics abolishes the crazy dice and restores the PSR – everything has a reason why it thus and not otherwise. Nothing happens by chance. There is no cosmic casino. Since reality is a mind, its purpose is to be a mind that knows itself, to hold up its magic lantern of consciousness and see itself reflected in that wondrous mirror and know itself for what it truly is. The task of the universe is to wipe out matter (entropy), leaving nothing but perfect consciousness (zero entropy). The end of the universe accomplishes exactly that. Just as Pierre Teilhard de Chardin said, we are a Noosphere – an evolving consciousness – converging on an Absolute, an Omega Point of perfect consciousness where we have become God, knowing all things. The domain of becoming is about converting unconscious God (prime matter) into conscious God (matterless). A cycle of the universe ends when its matter, its entropic unconscious thoughts, are eliminated, leaving nothing but pure consciousness, the final outcome of evolution. But the attainment of this glorious object instantly prepares the way for the defining involution event: the Big Bang, which reincarnates the material world. The struggle against the unconscious begins all over again. Francis Bowen wrote “Everything which lives strives after happiness; this is the most universal principle of action that we know of; it is the essence of the Will itself seeking its own gratification. Mere Will, however, though it is the only spring of activity, is essentially blind; it is not merely illogical or irrational, because it does not reason at all, even wrongly. It simply craves, and acts out its cravings in automatic volitions. Hence it is properly alogical, being entirely devoid of reason, just as the Intellect, being in its very nature distinct from Will, cannot act, but simply knows. Consequently, this ill-matched pair, indissolubly united in the Unconscious, cannot cooperate; neither can help the other. Vainly does the all-wise Intellect perceive that the unreasoning Will is entirely in the wrong, since its ceaseless craving for happiness merely increases misery; the alogical Will cannot heed its warnings, and cannot impart its own capacity of action to its wise but helpless companion. As long as they are tied together, like a balky team, they neutralize each other’s powers.” Hartmann, and Schopenhauer before him, were wrong. Will and Intellect are not natural-born competitors and rivals. They have the capacity to cooperate and satisfy their mutual interests. Plato presented the right sort of picture in his theory of the tripartite soul. In the Republic, Plato asserted that the psyche has three parts: the rational (logical), spirited (emotional) and desirous (appetitive). Reason must rule and direct emotion and desire. If emotion and desire are in charge, the result is disaster – as we see in the world we have today. Predatory capitalism, in order to make money, directly targets emotion and appetite and ignores reason. Capitalism is a Desire Machine. It provokes desires and then sells you things to satisfy the desires it has manufactured in you. Thanks to social media, the Desire Magnifier, things are getting worse and worse. You cannot separate the different parts of the psyche, as Hartmann imagined. You must get them to work in harmony, to sublimate themselves, to get rid of their most primitive and selfish aspects (their right-wing aspects). As consciousness increases, left-wing cooperation and rationalism increases. In the end, we create a Community of the Gods – true Communism; and the Society of the Divine – true socialism. You cannot have capitalism in a system of gods. Capitalism relies on a master-slave hierarchy, with the elite (the masters) relentlessly exploiting the slaves, and instilling a false consciousness in them to make them worship the elite as the rightful gods, or representatives of the rightful God. The aspect of us which drives consciousness is reason, the aspect that separates us from the animals. It is the truly immaterial part of us, as Plato and Aristotle both understood. Our desires, appetites, emotions, and sensory observations are all fully engaged with the material world, the irrational, non-conscious world. As the Gnostics understood, we are bright souls enmeshed in dark matter, in desperate need of returning to the light. The Gnostics understood matter to be evil. Today, we can understand that “matter” is a force connected with the deep unconscious. It is “psychoid”, to use Jung’s term, i.e. not quite of the mind proper. The task is for consciousness to overcome matter, the vehicle of the unconscious. It is in our war with matter – the alien “other” that seems so unmindlike – that we are forced to become conscious, to exercise our reason and logic more and more and enter more and more into the mind space rather than physical space. The crime of science is that it uses mathematics to investigate matter, but not to investigate mind. Because it is anti-conceptual and pro-perceptual, it can find no concept, and looks for no concept, to link mathematics to mind rather than matter. Ontological mathematics, by contrast, is all about mind and thought as mathematics. Science privileges the senses (tied to matter) over reason and logic (the primary agents of mind), and uses a butchered version of mathematics, designed to accommodate the manmade ideology of materialism and empiricism. It perversely forces reason and logic to serve the senses rather than the other way around. It builds its method on the senses, not on reason and logic, yet it absurdly claims to be rational and logical. As if. Any rational system begins with the PSR, and its method revolves around reason and logic. That’s what ontological mathematics delivers. Science does not. Science is not about consciousness and the inexorable rise and optimization of consciousness. Science is about non-consciousness (non-mind) and the random behavior of non-consciousness, driven by dice throws. No mind is ever at work, only randomness and probability. Science is incompatible with mind, free will and consciousness. That’s because science is fundamentally based on non-mind, on “matter”. Everything changes when you switch from undefined matter to precisely defined sinusoidal waves, and when you turn this wave-based system into a purely mental system by the simple identification of sinusoids with basis thoughts. Instantly, you have a system exclusively based on thinking, on mind. Reason and logic are the primary means to understand it, not the senses. Scientists are empiricists, not rationalists, and believe that the senses, not reason and logic, are the way to the truth. Kant also played the empiricist card and denounced “pure reason”. Kant had no clue what reality in itself is and declared it unknowable. Ontological mathematics cures this defect instantly. Reality in itself is thought, and thoughts are mathematical, analytic sinusoids. Therefore, everything can be known via analytic, waved-based mathematics. Pure reason is exactly what is needed for a total understanding of reality. Any other approach is irrational and doomed. What is “matter”? It’s what you get when you perform ontological Fourier mathematics and create a spacetime domain full of spacetime objects. These are entirely mental constructs, exactly as our dreams are. Matter is a mental phenomenon, made of waves, i.e. made of thought. Quantum mechanics, which reduces everything to wavefunctions, concurs with this view. Tragically, quantum mechanics has been systemically misinterpreted by materialist and empiricist ideologues in a desperate attempt to defend science’s ineradicable commitment to lifeless, mindless matter as the basis of reality. No scientist can define matter. What does matter have to do with probability wavefunctions? What does it have to do with 1-D strings in an 11-D space? Many Nobel laureates have admitted that “matter” does not exist, but not a single one of them accepted the logical alternative … that quantum mechanics is all about mind. They have abandoned matter but not replaced it with mind. Instead, they have filed the vacuum with irrational magic and miracles: with chance, accident, randomness, probability, statistics, measurement-induced wavefunction collapse, emergentism, indeterminism, indeterminacy, acausation, and so on. Science, these days, rejects both matter and mind and now subscribes to a casino-based model of reality, predicated on dice throws that produce observables which we lazily call “matter”, even though this matter is not solid, enduring, causal, objective and deterministic. It is now possible for scientists to say that the moon does not exist when no one is observing it, a notion which destroys objective reality, and destroys any concept of objective matter. The paradox of Schrödinger’s cat is not something that could ever be asserted of the kind of atoms the ancient Greeks believed in, and which Newton believed in: non-casino matter. How can the laws of gravity function when whole planets and stars can vanish if unobserved? If everyone closed their eyes, the universe itself could vanish. Who knew? If this is not the zenith of absurdity and irrationalism, what is? It’s even more pernicious than religion, which at least acknowledged objective reality. The Platonists, Neoplatonists and Gnostics all recognized that matter is as far as you can get from being, from mind, from spirit, from consciousness. The tragedy of the modern world is that “matter” is the ruling intellectual doctrine of the age. That’s the catastrophe the Enlightenment delivered. We need a new Enlightenment, where mind – mathematics – becomes the ruling doctrine. The Illuminati provide the vanguard of the great struggle to overthrow science and replace it with mathematics, just as science previously overthrew religion. Science is simply the pseudo-religion of matter. It’s time for the truth, it’s time for ontological mathematics. Why is Leibniz so dazzlingly brilliant? Because his whole system is predicated on mind, and explains everything via mind. Monads rule. Why is Hegel so dazzlingly brilliant? Because his whole system is about the journey of a Cosmic Mind, including all of us, to complete and absolute knowledge of itself, to total self-awareness. What ontological mathematics accomplishes is to make the Leibnizian-Hegelian system fully mathematical, hence it allows it to replace wholesale scientific materialism and empiricism (driven by sensory experiments) with scientific idealism and rationalism (driven by mathematics). Conventional science cannot explain why it uses mathematics, and why it would be useless without mathematics. The New Science dispenses with these insurmountable problems and makes science all about mathematics, and in particular all about sinusoidal waves and their extraordinary properties, which are sufficient to explain the entire universe. ===== Francis Bowen wrote, “Happiness is unattainable; but freedom from pain, which is the nearest possible approximation to it, may be secured by a return to nothingness.” This is essentially what Buddhism is: the desire to be free from suffering by ceasing to exist. It has nothing to do with joy, bliss, happiness, pleasure. It is simply about escaping pain. The Buddhist in hell does not dream of heaven, he dreams of not being in hell anymore, by virtue of not existing anymore. He disbelieves in the possibility of heaven. Buddhism tells him to deny it. The Buddha says, “I teach only Suffering and the end of Suffering.” No hint of heaven there! Bowen wrote, “Hence the Intellect forms the conception of a universe in which the Will shall be divided against itself, through the indefinite multiplication of individuals, each striving independently for ends of its own; and the necessary result of such independent action, as we have seen, is the emancipation of Intellect from the Will through the development of Consciousness.” In fact, the universe (of becoming) breaks itself into infinite separate minds in order to provide the biggest possible challenge to Consciousness, and therefore the greatest possible resultant Consciousness when the greatest possible obstacle to Consciousness is overcome. You can’t get to heaven without traversing the whole of hell. The Heaven Gate is on the opposite side from the Hell Gate. Bowen wrote, “This conception of a universe, of course, is instantly realized by the blind Will, which knows not that it is thereby cheated into a contest with itself, that ideas will thus be forced upon it which it has not willed, that thought will thus be severed from action, and that the finite Intellect, thus made independent, will be gradually led, through the enhancement of consciousness and the increase of knowledge, to will the annihilation of all things, and thus to rid itself of the misery of existence.” It is in fact essential for the unitary Will – which meets no resistance – to fragment into infinite fragments (divine sparks) in order to maximize its ability to learn. It now has infinite scope for interacting with itself and learning from itself. What greater challenge could there be? Bowen wrote, “As Intellect can never be separated from the Will in the Unconscious, the ultimate purpose of the universe is to effect this divorce through the action of finite conscious minds and the advancement of knowledge, which must finally correct the illusions which keep up the vain pursuit of happiness, and bring about by common consent the end of all things.” The task of consciousness is not in fact to divorce the will, but to optimize it, to sublimate its primitive drives and make them serve divine ends, to convert the base will of animals into the divine will of gods. Bowen wrote, “Schopenhauer’s philosophy aims at the same result [as Hartmann’s], but proposes to accomplish it by a different method, namely, by advising the individual man to cease to will, and thereby, through asceticism, self-denial, and the privation of nourishment, to cease to be. Hartmann justly objects that this would be only protracted and painful suicide by starvation, and be no more efficient as a means of bringing the world to an end than the death of an individual in the ordinary course of nature. Final deliverance from the misery of this world cannot be obtained by an act of individual Will, as this is merely phenomenal, but only by universal consent, which would be an expression of the universal Will that is both one and all. And this deliverance is not near at hand, but must be worked for as an object in the distant future. It can take place only at the close of ‘the Process,’ at the termination of the struggle between Consciousness and the Will, when the development of the former shall have reached its climax, at the last day, when the cravings of the Will shall be silenced, when activity shall cease, and ‘Time shall be no more.’” Schopenhauer, like the Buddha, taught individual salvation from the “horror” of existence. But this does not bring the world to an end, only the individual’s experience of the world. Hartmann had a much grander conception – getting all minds to cease to will at the same time and then the whole world – their collective construct – would come to an end. Or, more exactly, to get all conscious minds – human minds – to defeat the evil Will. Conscious reason is the antidote to Will. In ontological mathematics, the end of the universe happens as a mathematical inevitability. The universe must end with the maximization of reason and consciousness and the elimination of matter and entropy via the expansion of the universe, which eventually causes the dimensional waves that comprise the physical universe to flatline and thus cease to exist, instantly signifying the death of the material universe, and its restoration to a pure Singularity (Cosmic Mind). Bowen wrote, “We can do something, indeed, to hasten this consummation, by laboring for the advancement of knowledge, which will finally convince the whole human race that all is vanity and vexation of spirit. Not by personal renunciation and cowardly withdrawal from the conflict, therefore as Schopenhauer teaches; but by bearing our burden, by affirming the Will to live with all its pains and sorrows, by devoting ourselves to the cultivation of the intellect and to the education of the race, shall we help to bring the universe nearer to the haven of rest, to the blissful repose of nothingness.” Knowledge is power. Knowledge is freedom. Knowledge is control of our destiny. The task is not to affirm suffering, but to overcome it, to become what we truly are: gods. Hartmann wrote, “Bravely onward, then, in the great Process of development, as laborers in the Master’s vineyard! For it is only this Process which can lead to final redemption.” Redemption does not mean ceasing to will, longing for nothingness. That is a depraved nihilism. To think is to exist. We exist forever because we think forever. We cannot cease thinking any more than we can cease willing. It’s our nature. It’s inbuilt. We are essentially thinking, willing beings. Bowen described Hartmann’s work as an exercise of “perverted ingenuity … It’s an attempt to reconcile materialism with spiritualism, realism with idealism, optimism with pessimism, atheism with the belief in a divine Providence, and monism with common sense.” Well, it’s no more perverted in its ingenuity than any mainstream religion! Or scientific materialism.’

The enlightened Dr. Thomas Stark

Tags: Ontological Mathematics

## MY RELIGION IS PYTHAGOREAN ILLUMINISM

# MY RELIGION IS PYTHAGOREAN ILLUMINISM

**A Quick Thank You To The Pythagorean Illuminati And Khan Academy**

“The Singularity is the Cartesian origin. It’s the frequency (mental) domain at the heart of the spacetime (material) domain. You can *never *validly refer to spacetime without also referring to the Singularity. This, in fact, is the whole problem with science. Science, even though it acknowledges the spacetime universe erupting from a Singularity at the Big Bang, then denies the ongoing existence of this Singularity (which in fact goes on controlling spacetime as the Cosmic Mind to the Cosmic Body = universe).”–From the book *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati.

I was recently able to complete all of the lessons and exercises in the differential calculus section of Khan Academy’s AP Calculus BC course (I’m not sure what the hell AP Calculus BC even stands for, but it was the most in depth calculus course on Khan Academy, so it’s the course I’ve been working on), and I couldn’t be more excited! I’m just now beginning my journey into integral calculus, and I’m currently studying the basics of how to use left and right Riemann sums to find the area under a curve. Again, this is all super exciting for me, and I would like to start this blog post off by saying thank you to the Pythagorean Illuminati and Khan Academy. It is thanks to these two groups of hard working meritocrats that I’ve been able to accomplish something I wasn’t sure I was capable of, namely, learning calculus.

I was having a relatively smooth journey through differential calculus and then, as usual, I hit the word problems and my smooth progress became a bit bumpy. Man alive, those calculus word problems were challenging for me. Sometimes it would take me an entire day to solve a single problem. The awesome thing is that I was usually able to find the solution or solutions to those tricky and long problems, and each time I was successful with my answer, it would get me more pumped up than I would be after winning a hard fought Mixed Martial Arts bout. If becoming skilled at mathematics doesn’t get your juices flowing, then either you haven’t read all of the books that comprise Mike Hockney’s *God Series *and Dr. Thomas Stark’s *Truth Series* (i.e. the books written by the Pythagorean Illuminati), or there is simply something wrong with your juices.

Just for a little fun, here is the last problem in the last exercise module in Khan Academy’s differential calculus course that I did before completing the course: “In a restaurant, the daily menu is mounted on wallboard. The printed region with today’s entrees include 216 square inches of text. If there are two-inch margins on the sides and three-inch margins at the bottom and the top, what are the dimensions of the smallest piece of wallboard that can be used for the menu?” Luckily for me, by the time I got to this particular problem I was starting to get the hang of solving these types of calculus word problems, so it only took me hours to solve as opposed to days! In case you’re curious, the smallest possible piece of wallboard that can be used for this restaurant’s menu turned out to be 16 inches by 24 inches. What a cool and fun differential calculus word problem!

Anyway, I’ve been working to be able to learn calculus ever since I was fortunate enough to discover the sacred books of ontological mathematics and Pythagorean Illuminism seven years ago, and completing Differential Calculus on Khan Academy has been a goal of mine for these past seven years. Being able to finally accomplish this goal is absolutely exhilarating for me.

So, to begin with, I would like to say thank you to the Pythagorean Illuminati for everything they have done, and continue to do, for the people of this planet. I want to say thank you to them for teaching me the mathematical Truth of reality. If it weren’t for these brilliant authors and their selfless work, I would never have been able to realize that mathematics defines reality because mathematics *is *reality, and hence I would never have began studying mathematics, which is the greatest and healthiest possible workout a person can do for their mind because mathematics *is *mind.

Studying mathematics is doing for my mind what studying Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu and Mixed Martial Arts does for my body, i.e. mathematics is making my mind stronger and stronger. Seven years ago, I wouldn’t have been able to understand what the definition of a derivative even means (note: in abstract mathematics, derivatives are the focus of differential calculus; they give you the slope of the tangent line to any point on a curve, which can also be thought of as the instantaneous rate of change of a function at any point along its curve), but now, thanks to the Illuminati’s ultra-inspiring work, I have been able to complete the full differential calculus course on Khan Academy, and, as I mentioned above, am just now beginning to learn integral calculus.

Honestly, a few years ago I was slightly intimidated by mathematics, and I wasn’t quite sure that my punch addled brain could even handle higher levels of math like calculus. I say “punch addled” because I was a professional Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) fighter for quite a few years, and over that time I took many a blow to the old noggin.

A quick aside here: As I mentioned above, the practice of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu and Mixed Martial Arts, if done in an intelligent and controlled manner, can be beneficial to a person’s health and well being. They can help make your physical body stronger and healthier. Professional Mixed Martial Arts competition is another story entirely though. Professional Mixed Martial Arts is never intelligent nor controlled, and damage to the physical body (especially the brain from all of the head blows) is inevitable. This damage is accrued through the ridiculous amount of ridiculously rough fight training a fighter does to prepare for a fight, as well as the actual violent fight itself.

If I remember correctly, I ended my MMA competition days with 29 pro MMA bouts, 4 no rules challenge matches at the gym I trained at (these matches were fights where some weirdo or weirdos would come into the gym where I trained from off the street and want to “test” themselves by fighting one of the gym’s trained fighters, which sometimes was me), too many grappling competitions for me to remember, and, last but not least, all of the crazy training that went along with these competitions. It is from all of these martial arts competitions, plus all the competition training and preparation, that the vast majority of my lingering injuries came from. One of the biggest problems I’ve had since I stopped competing in MMA is nasty headaches that occur frequently.

It is because of all the times my brain got raddled around inside of my head that I was slightly concerned about whether or not I would be able to understand and solve calculus problems. These negative thoughts should have never entered my mind. Studying mathematics has been nothing but beneficial for me. So far I have had no problems learning and understanding any of the math concepts I have studied on Khan Academy. I think the damage I did to my brain via too many years spent fighting other human beings in a cage is actually healing up because of mathematics study. I am thinking MUCH clearer than I did prior to finding the work of the Pythagorean Illuminati and ipso facto beginning to truly study mathematics, and my headaches are becoming less painful and less frequent. For this, I cannot thank the Illuminati enough. My brain and I are testament to the universal Truth that the diligent study of True mathematics, reason, and logic (i.e. the diligent study of *ONTOLOGICAL MATHEMATICS*) can literally *heal *the damaged mental state of humanity.

So, one more time because it simply can’t be said enough: Thank you to the Pythagorean Illuminati for everything. You have saved the souls of myself and many other people through your incredible books. Humanity owes you everything. One day in the not too distant future, a rational, intelligent, logical, mathematical, meritocratic, wise, creative, artistic, altruistic, compassionate, brave, strong, and united humanity will celebrate the mentally liberating work of the Pythagorean Illuminati. That day can’t come soon enough.

Before I move along, I would also like to quickly thank the great Sal Khan and his amazing (and free) online school–Khan Academy. This website makes studying mathematics on your own SO much easier. Khan Academy takes a student by the hand and leads her through all of the concepts of mathematics. It lets a student practice and master each concept via its amazing exercise modules, and it does all of this for free.

Khan Academy doesn’t only teach math though. No, it is an entire online educational academy, and you can study almost any subject you’re interested in on it. The site is constantly updated with fresh material and content, and brand new lectures, lessons, and exercise modules are being added to it all the time. I just can’t say enough about this incredible website.

If you are an Illuminist, a Hyperian, an ontological mathematician, a rationalist, a Pythagorean, a Leibnizian, a Hegelian, a Platonist, a reader of Mike Hockney’s *God Series *or Dr. Thomas Stark’s *Truth Series*, or somebody who simply wants to improve your knowledge and understanding of mathematics and science, then Khan Academy is the place for you. I’m a retired MMA fighter with a shitty high school education who started on Khan Academy all the way back at its elementary school mathematics courses (which I could barely remember how to do at the time!), and am now entering integral calculus! It is very exciting! So, if you’ve got free time on your hands and feel like doing some learning, stop by Khan Academy and give it a try. I think you’ll be amazed by the amount of excellent educational content you find there.

**Ontological Mathematics**

“‘Abstract’ mathematicians have no understanding of the greatest tool in mathematics–calculus. Calculus, without reference to Leibnizian monads–is absurd. Leibniz, the discoverer of calculus, and the greatest genius in human history, was the only person who fully understood calculus, and the fact that it must be intrinsically tied to monads. The rest of the matheamtical community, while accepting Leibniz’s notation and basic approach to calculus (bar the monads!) essentially followed Newton’s spacetime (scientific) understanding of calculus.”–From the book *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati.

Since I’m currently in the midst of learning calculus, and it is very much on my mind at the moment, I thought this might be a good time to talk about what it is that calculus is telling us about reality*. *In other words, I would like to take some time to think about the ontological significance of calculus, both differential and integral calculus. But before I get into thinking about ontological calculus specifically, I would first like to talk a little bit about ontological mathematics in general.

Now, it’s super fun (and very handy) to be able to figure out a calculus word problem like the one from Khan Academy I wrote out above. That’s what mathematics does for a conscious mind after all: it strengthens it up to the point that it is able to use math, reason and logic to solve any and all problems concerning reality, no matter how non-mathematical they might seem to be.

But why should this be? I mean, why should mathematics be able to answer *any *questions we humans might come up with concerning space, time, and matter, much less *all *questions? Why is mathematics found absolutely *everywhere* we look? Why is it totally ubiquitous throughout the Cosmos? Why can it be used to describe our entire universe with such pinpoint accuracy? Why do empirical scientific materialists rely on non-sensory mathematics to explain all of their sensory experiments? Why would scientific materialism and empiricism, which purports to study reality via experimentation, completely fall apart without the non-material, non-empirical, non-experimental, and hyper-rational mathematics that underpins it?

I’m not joking in the least when I say that all of life’s most mysterious and important questions will be answered for the human race if we can just pull our collective head out of our collective ass, and at long last see the Truth of mathematics. This sacred and profound Truth has been staring us in the face ever since we became conscious beings inside of the cosmos, indeed, the great Pythagoras intuited and revealed this Truth to us some 2500 years ago. But of course we didn’t listen.

It is precisely because humanity was (and still is) unwilling to listen to the genius words of Pythagoras that it fell victim, over and over again, to evil confidence men and charlatans such as Abraham, Moses, Jesus Christ, Muhammad, the Buddah, etc. Humanity’s dark and sordid past is entirely due to these sick individuals and the evil religions and ideologies they shit out. Throughout our history, these vile religions and irrational systems of thought have ruined our minds, and, along with them, our world. It is precisely because of these ancient, decrepit, idiotic, irrational, and completely *evil*religions that we human beings have NEVER been able to make any kind of connection to the 100% mathematical Truth of the universe.

It is more important now than ever for the human race to discover the Truth of itself and the universe, and this Truth begins and ends with discovering the Truth of mathematics. It is the Truth of mathematics, reason, and logic that will free us all from our self imposed chains, and allow us all to step out of the cave of darkness and complacent ignorance, into the light of knowledge. Seeing all of this, it becomes imperative for humanity to be able to correctly answer the questions concerning mathematics and scientific materialism that I wrote a few paragraphs above. Answering these profound questions correctly is quite literally the most important thing humanity can do for itself at this dark moment in time.

Alright, let’s think for a minute. What are the answers to these most important of questions concerning the origins and ontology of mathematics? Why is mathematics found absolutely *everywhere* in the universe*,* and why does it answer absolutely all questions concerning the universe *perfectly? *Surely you don’t think human scientists and mathematicians *invented* mathematics, do you? If you do think this, then I have a few more questions for you. Which scientist or mathematician invented the number *Pi*? Which scientist or mathematician invented the number *e*? If humans invented math, then why don’t they know where numbers such as Pi and e end? Which scientist or mathematician invented a sine wave? Which scientist or mathematician invented a cosine wave? Which scientist or mathematician invented that the angles of a triangle in Euclidean geometry always add up to 180 degrees? Which scientist or mathematician invented conic sections? Which scientist or mathematician invented the unit circle? Which scientist or mathematician invented the Pythagorean Theorem? Which scientist or mathematician invented Euler’s formula and equation? I could go on and on but I think you get the point.

So, can you tell me which scientist or mathematician invented *anything* at all in mathematics? You can’t because absolutely no scientist or mathematician ever has, or ever *could, *invent anything in mathematics. The only thing about mathematics that human scientists and mathematicians have ever “invented” is all of the fallacious and false ways that humanity, as a species, has come to *define* and *interpret* mathematics; ways entirely predicated on the fallible and dysfunctional human sensory apparatus and human sensory experiments; ways such as the tedious and boring *Set Theory *of conventional, abstract mathematics. And we wonder why most kids have no interest in studying math at school.

Let’s get this straight right now: It’s absolutely IMPOSSIBLE for any mind, human or otherwise, to invent ANYTHING in mathematics. So again I ask you: Why is mathematics perfect for solving all problems, and why does it completely saturate our universe? There can only be one answer to these life changing questions, and that answer is that humans don’t *invent *mathematics, they *discover *it.

Humanity *discovers *mathematics all throughout the cosmos precisely because space, time, matter, and indeed the entire universe, are completely derived from, made out of, and created by mathematics. Mathematics is eternal. It is the permanent foundation that reality is built on top of. Mathematics *is *reality. This is why mathematics explains EVERYTHING. It even explains all of the things you mistakenly think are inexplicable–things such as the soul and the afterlife. In fact, once you understand mathematics the way it’s supposed to be understood, i.e. ontologically, seemingly supernatural things such as the aforementioned soul and afterlife become as natural as 1+1=2.

A proper understanding of mathematics will bring humanity a proper understanding of religion. Absolutely all of the questions of religion can be definitively answered by mathematics. This is why mathematics, when properly understood by humanity, will totally free us from the mental prison built by all of our deadly, story based religions (including the story based religions of free market capitalism and its good buddy scientific materialism). Once humanity collectively discovers the Truth of mathematics, it will ipso facto become a liberated species.

The Truth of mathematics is that it is ontological. It is *real. *It is *all* that is real. It completely defines what can actually be *known*. Mathematics IS ontology AND epistemology. Mathematics IS science. Physics comes from mathematics, chemistry comes from physics, and biology comes from chemistry. Do you see how everything is based on mathematics?

Mathematics is the basis and foundation of ALL science. It is the basis and foundation of ALL philosophy. It is the basis and foundation of ALL psychology. It is the basis and foundation of ALL thought. It is the basis and foundation of ALL emotions. It is the basis and foundation of ALL sensations. Mathematics is the eternal, necessary, complete, and consistent basis and foundation of *REALITY. * This is why mathematics is found absolutely everywhere we look in the universe, and it is why mathematics perfectly answers all questions about the universe. The universe is literally *made *out of mathematics because it *is *mathematics.

**Pythagorean Illuminism = The Study Of Ontological Mathematics**

“‘Spacetime (material) calculus is formally false. Only spacetime calculus grounded in frequency (mental) calculus is valid, i.e. calculus must be underpinned by monadic frequency domains located in a Singularity, sited at the origin of the Cartesian coordinate grid. All calculus processes must refer to this invisible Singularity.”–From the book *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati.

Pythagorean Illuminism is my religion. It is the philosophy and ideology that guides my life. Pythagorean Illuminism is a religion, philosophy, and ideology that is entirely unlike any other religion, philosophy, or ideology out there. You see, Pythagorean Illuminism is the world’s only Logos religion. This means it is a religion that uses math, science, reason, and logic to understand what is going on in the universe as opposed to stories. Story based religions are Mythos religions, and they currently rule our world. Pythagorean Illuminism is a religion, philosophy, and ideology that is fully based on mathematics, reason and logic, and it contends that mathematics, when interpreted and understood properly, perfectly answers each and every question concerning the universe and reality.

In Pythagorean Illuminsim, True mathematics, i.e. the mathematics of reality, is called *ontological mathematics* (alternatively it is termed *Illuminism, **Hyperianism,* *mathematical idealism*, *scientific rationalism and idealism*, *wave mathematics, monadic mathematics, *or *transcendental mathematics*), and it is ontological mathematics that forms the unbreakable foundation that the religion of Pythagorean Illuminism is built on top of. Absolutely all other religions, philosophies, and ideologies found on this planet are, in one way or another, based on Mythos, i.e. they are based on irrational and absurd *stories, *hence they are ALL FALSE. Stories don’t and can’t explain, define, or create anything, only mathematics can do that, therefore: Pythagorean Illuminism is THE ONLY TRUE RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY, AND IDEOLOGY BAR NONE, period.

Ontological mathematics is the study of mathematics *as* reality, and Pythagorean Illuminism is the study of ontological mathematics. Pythagorean Illuminism and ontological mathematics have been introduced to the world by a team of brilliant writers. These writers are experts at rational and logical thinking, i.e. they are experts in mathematics, science, philosophy, and psychology, and their work 100% reflects this fact. This genius writing team is a communication cell of the most enigmatic secret society to ever exist on this planet: The Pythagorean Illuminati.

This single communication cell of the Illuminati has written many different books and many different book series, all of which are available for purchase on *Amazon *(note: for those who are interested, I have left links to the Pythagorean Illuminati’s *Amazon *author pages at the end of this blog post). The writing team writes using a few different pseudonyms. If you’re ever confused about whether or not a book is an official book of the Pythagorean Illuminati and ontological mathematics, then check the *Amazon* author pages or head on over to the Illuminati’s amazing website where a full list of their books can be found. The official website of the Pythagorean Illuminati is http://www.armageddonconspiracy.co.uk/

If you’re fucking sick and tired of the self serving lies being vomited out on a daily basis by all of humanity’s Mythos religions, Mythos political parties, Mythos philosophies, and Mythos ideologies, then you might be a human being who is receptive to the Truth of reality, i.e. you might be a human being who is receptive to Pythagorean Illuminism = Ontological Mathematics. If this is you, then become an Illuminist. Go out and pick up your first book by the Pythagorean Illuminati and prepare to come face to face with your *Soul.*

**Ontological Calculus**

“We need a brand new understanding of the Cartesian coordinate grid. It needs to have an ontological Singularity–a Mind–placed at its origin. The Singularity is the Fourier frequency domain, and the rest of the grid the Fourier spacetime domain. The Big Bang is nothing but a Fourier process creating spacetime from the frequency Singularity (the Cartesian origin). The Cartesian grid must be replaced by the Fourier-Cartesian grid, reflecting frequency as well as spacetime.”–From the book *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati.

Please note that I will be performing some calculus and some ontological interpretations of calculus in this next section of my blog post. Any mathematical or philosophical mistakes I make in this section are entirely my own, and have nothing to do with the work of the Pythagorean Illuminati.

If you would like a detailed look at ontological calculus written by experts and not an ex-MMA fighter, then I would advice you to read *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati. This book contains invaluable information concerning ontological calculus, and it was the inspiration for this blog post.

I’m currently reading *How to Create the Universe* again because of my recent calculus studies, and it’s helping me to get the hang of the differences between abstract calculus and ontological calculus. These differences revolve around the real existence of the hyper-rational Monadic Collective Singularity, i.e. the Cosmic Mind, i.e. MATHEMATICS AS IT TRULY IS, which is situated at the exact center of the universe. Of course, abstract mathematics and empirical scientific materialism both deny the existence of any such universe controlling Mind, which is exactly why abstract mathematics and scientific materialism are ultimately *irrational* subjects.

Here is a link to *How to Create the Universe* for anyone who is interested:

Now back to calculus. At the top of one of the previous segments of this blog post, before I veered off and started ranting about idiotic and evil Mythos religion (which I tend to do a lot!), I mentioned I wanted to think a little bit about the ontological significance of calculus. Now, as you can probably imagine, calculus, both differential and integral, plays a HUGE roll in the workings of the universe and reality. In fact, calculus and Fourier wave mathematics explain and define absolutely ALL of reality.

We are all here in space and time. This means we are all currently inhabiting a dimensional domain of what scientific materialists term *matter. *Contrary to what mainstream science says, the domain of space and time is a six dimensional domain consisting of three real/space dimensions and three imaginary/time dimensions. But where do these space and time dimensions derive from? Rationally, non-dimensionality is the only thing that can exist. So where does dimensionality come from? Or, to be a bit more precise, where does the 100% mathematically defined *illusion* of dimensionality come from? Further, once spacetime dimensionality is established within the cosmos, how does it (i.e. dimsionality) return to non-dimensionality? In other words, how does the *Big Crunch *produce the *Big Bang, *and similarly, how does the *Big Bang *in turn produce the *Big Crunch? *This is where differential and integral calculus come into play.* *

You see calculus, when understood properly and ontologically, is precisely what allows *dimensionality *to be added to and subtracted from reality. The preeminent philosophers and ontological mathematicians, Mike Hockney and Dr. Thomas Stark (a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati), refer to calculus as a *dimensionality stepladder. *This ingenious metaphor helps out tremendously when trying to visualize what is happening mathematically within the universe.

Calculus is the controller of dimensionality. Calculus shows us how the Monadic Collective Singularity (i.e. the collection of all our individual minds/souls, which exist outside of space and time within a zero-dimension domain of pure light) mathematically creates and adds dimensionality to reality via integration (which is studied in integral calculus), and how it mathematically erases and subtracts dimensionality from reality via differentiation (which is studied in differential calculus).

This can all be gleaned by studying calculus with an eye for ontology (i.e. studying calculus after studying the work of the Pythagorean Illuminati). When you look at calculus ontologically, you can begin to get an idea of what is going on in the universe. Let’s take a few minutes to think about differentiation (subtracting dimensions) and integration (adding dimensions), and what they are telling us about reality.

Let’s first take a look at differentiation. To be simple, let’s take the expression x cubed (i.e. x^3), which is graphed above, and let’s see what happens when we differentiate it a few times. Before we differentiate this thing, let’s say that x^3 is some sort of dimensional expression of mathematics. For now, it doesn’t matter what x^3 ontologically *is* within the domain of dimensionality, it just matters that we are thinking of this expression as a dimensional expression.

Now, when we differentiate x^3 once, we end up with 3x squared (i.e. 3x^2) as a solution. After our first differentiation, we can see that we have went from an expression raised to the third power to an expression raised to the second power. Continuing along, we can go ahead and differentiate 3x^2 next, i.e. we can differentiate our original expression x^3 for a second time. When we do this, we end up with 6x as a solution. We can see that, after this second differentiation, we again decremented our exponent by one. Now, if we differentiate our original expression x^3 for a third time, i.e. if we differentiate 6x, we end up with the number 6 as a solution. We can again see that differentiation has caused our original function’s exponent to be decremented by one (x^0 = 1, so 6 = 6x^0), and we are now left with a constant as a solution.

But the constant 6 isn’t the end of the line. No, it can still be differentiated one more time. In abstract calculus, when we perform our fourth and final differentiation of x^3 via differentiating the constant 6, we find that we end up at zero. Now, when I was first learning this on Khan Academy, I didn’t remember what was written in *How to Create the Universe *about how the differentiation of a constant in ontological calculus differs from the differentiation of a constant in abstract calculus. I originally thought that the differentiation of a constant being zero meant that ontologically, at that point in time, the mathematical function had lost all dimensionality and returned back to the Monadic Collective, which is a zero dimension Fourier frequency domain outside of space and time.

However, I’m now currently rereading *How to Create the Universe, *and I’m seeing that the way abstract calculus differentiates a constant is incorrect. The zero result of abstract calculus isn’t referring to ontological, dynamic, and full zero (i.e. the Monadic Collective) at all. No, the zero result of abstract calculus is referring to abstract, static, and empty zero, which equates to nonexistence, which, by definition, doesn’t exist. The zero result of abstract calculus means absolutely nothing, hence is non-ontological, hence is pointless.

In ontological calculus, when a dimensional constant such as 6 is differentiated, it doesn’t become nothing. This would constitute a loss of information which equates to the destruction of *energy. *The destruction of energy is impossible. Energy can neither be created nor destroyed, it is eternal. The only thing you can do with energy is rearrange it in infinite ways. So again, in ontological calculus, when a dimensional constant within space and time is differentiated, it doesn’t become nothing; no, on the contrary, it becomes a dimensionless constant outside of space and time, within the domain of frequency. So if we were to differentiate our example constant of *dimensional *spacetime 6, it would produce a constant of *dimensionless* frequency 6 as a result.

A return to frequency equates to a return to the Cosmic Mind, i.e. a return to the Monadic Collective Singularity outside of space and time. A return to frequency equates to a return to dynamic, ontological, full zero, which is the origin of mathematics and the *container *for absolutely everything. A return to frequency equates to a return to pure *Light.*

Do you see what just happened here? We went from a relatively complicated, dimensional expression like x^3, and, through the mathematical operation of differentiation, we ended up back at ontological zero, i.e. the Monadic Collective. In other words, if we equate the mathematical expression x^3 to something that exists ontologically and dimensionally within space and time, then we can see that differentiation allows us to continuously subtract dimensions until we arrive back at the frequency domain of dynamic and full zero. In still other words, via differentiation, we were able to take an n-dimensional thing and turn it into a zero dimensional thing. Such is the power of calculus.

Ontological zero is the origin of everything. Ontological zero is the home of the mind, the soul, and the entire Monadic Collective. Ontological zero *is *the Monadic Collective. Ontological zero is the container for ALL of mathematics, hence it is the container for *reality*. Ontological zero is how mathematics actually exists within the universe. Ontological zero is the origin of mathematics, hence it is the origin of *everything.* Ontological zero is the absolute Truth of the universe, and it explains everything about the universe.

Next, since I still have a lot of work left to do in the abstract integral calculus course on Khan Academy, let’s just take a very quick look at ontological integral calculus. Integral calculus is the reverse of differential calculus. Where differentiation moves us down the dimensionality stepladder, integration moves us up it. It is via ontological integration that the universe adds mathematical dimensionality to itself.

Integration can be thought of as the summing up of an infinite number of infinitesimally small things, things such as the Myriad ontological flowing point particles which, via their perfect circular trajectories, trace out eternal and ontological unit circles outside of space and time. These Myriad point particles form the Myriad monads which form the Monadic Collective Singularity of pure light, which, once again, is located outside of space and time. Ontological integration is the mathematical operation that controls the *Big Bang *that scientific materialism likes to talk about. This operation can be seen at the very beginning of integral calculus when you first start to learn about Riemann sums.

The idea of integration and the integral is tied closely to the notion of differentiation and the derivative. Where differentiation allows us to take a dimensional, spacetime function and differentiate it to find its zero dimension, frequency function derivative, integration allows us to first start with a zero dimension, frequency function derivative, and then, via the operation of integration, discover the original function whose derivative it is (i.e. integration allows us to find a derivative’s anti-derivative). In other words, ontological differential calculus takes something in space and time and returns it to frequency, while ontological integral calculus takes something out of frequency and places it inside of space and time (though in Truth nothing is ever actually able to leave frequency; the feeling of being in a material body within space and time is a mathematically generated *illusion*).

With left and right Riemann sums, we can begin to get an inkling of how the universe builds something out of “nothing”. In integral calculus, a Riemann sum allows us to discover the area under a curve. This area is created, as I mentioned above, by the summing up of an infinite number of infinitesimally small things. If we equate the area under a curve to a dimensional something, and if we equate the infinite number of infinitesimally small things to dimensionless somethings (i.e. *nothings*), then we can begin to see how integration adds dimsionality to reality, and eventually creates the whole universe of space, time and matter.

So, to recapitulate this section. Ontological calculus is a stepladder leading from non-dimension to dimension, and back again. Via integration, calculus allows us to add dimensionality. This adding of dimensionality through integration equates to the *Big Bang. *Integration is what allows the dimensionless, Monadic Collective Singularity of pure frequency outside of space and time to expand itself (i.e. to add dimensions to itself) into the six dimensional domain of space and time that we all are currently inhabiting.

Via differentiation, calculus allows us to subtract dimensions until we return to a dimensionless, frequency existence. If the adding of dimensions through integration equates to a Big Bang, then the subtracting of dimensions through differentiation equates to a Big Crunch*. *Ontological differentiation is the compression of space, time and matter back into the dimensionless Singularity from whence they came. It is when the dimensionless, Monadic Collective Singularity outside of space and time decides to fold itself back up, and compress all of its dimensions back into ontological zero.

Differentiation and integration are constantly in operation throughout the universe, and together they form the feedback loop which we call mind and matter. As Mike Hockney says in *How to Create the Universe*: “Calculus is a process linking mind to matter”. Once humanity understands everything there is to know about ontological calculus, it will ipso facto understand everything there is to know about mind, matter, life, and so-called “death”.

So, as you can see, if you want all of the answers to the universe, you have no other choice but to study mathematics ontologically, and this all begins with studying the work of the Pythagorean Illuminati. One day soon, ontological mathematics will usher in the golden age of the human race. That day can’t arrive fast enough.

**Ontological Mathematics Will Immanentize The Eschaton**

“Descartes himself was certain of the existence of unextended, dimensionless thinking substance, yet it does not feature at all in his own Cartesian grid. This can be rectified at a stroke by replacing the “empty” Cartesian origin with a Fourier frequency domain: a Singularity composed of countless monads, each of which is a self-contained frequency domain = a mind, a soul.”–From the book *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati.

The sooner the entire human race discovers and integrates ontological mathematics into their lives, the sooner we will all be free from the mental cages we have created for ourselves. Once we have freed ourselves from our self imposed fetters–fetters that are keeping us all locked inside of good old Plato’s cave of ignorance–via the study of ontological mathematics, Illuminism, and Hyperianism, we will finally be able to understand the True meaning of the words *freedom *and *liberty. *At that point in time, humanity will at long last be in a position to *immanentize the eschaton*.

What does *immanentize the eschaton *mean? Well, it means creating heaven right here on Earth. Ontological mathematics is THE ONLY subject that will allow us human beings to create heaven on Earth for ALL people. It is THE ONLY subject that will allow us to finally be able to effectuate a Truly humanitarian society.

This humanitarian society would be a society that is at last free from the poisons of classism, racism, sexism, and homophobia.

It would be a society that is at last free from the evil 1%, a.k.a. the Old World Order, a.k.a. the ownership class, a.k.a. the elite, a.k.a. the biggest shit heads ever.

It would be a society that is at last free from the legions of idiotic, irrational, racist, sexist, homophobic, and troglodytic supporters of the psychopathic ownership class. Come on, you know the “people” I’m talking about. These are the army of greedy scum bags who would love nothing more than to have Donald “grab them by the pussy” Trump’s shriveled up orange dick stuffed down their throats. I’m of course talking about the traitorous lunatics we have euphemistically termed the* right-wing. *

A truly humanitarian society would be a society that is at last free from the anti-economic system hilariously called *free market capitalism.* Destructive, exploitative, wasteful, and oppressive free market crapitalism isn’t an economic system at all. How could it be? Economic systems are supposed to be *economical. *They’re supposed to be completely efficient systems that produce as close to zero waste and pollution as possible. They’re supposed to work in harmony with the planet and the environment. They’re supposed to be clear thinking, rational and logical systems that are fair and just to ALL. They’re supposed to be altruistic systems that work exclusively for the General Will of the People, and not for any particular human wills. They’re supposed to be built around reason, logic, and empirical evidence, all aimed at creating the most just and efficient human society possible. This is what True economic systems are supposed to be like.

True economic systems are absolutely not supposed to be like free market crapitalism. That is, they’re absolutely not supposed to be hyper-emotional, inefficient, wasteful, gluttonous, pollution and poison producing, violent machines of death and devastation *designed* to benefit only 1% of society at the expense of EVERYTHING else. This is why free market crapitalism is the exact opposite of a True economic system. It is the evil twin of a True economic system. It is what an economic system would look like on Bizarro World. It is what Peter Joseph calls a *plutonomy *(i.e. an economy controlled by the rich). It is an anti-economic system of the highest order, and it is destroying our world.

In truth, free market crapitalism is nothing more than a rigged game, a game created by and for the wealthy so that they can continue to rob the poor and impoverished, just as they have always done. Free market crapitalism is simply the latest (and greatest) ploy by the avaricious, rapacious, and insane rich to further line their own pockets. Free market crapitalism is the exact means the parasitical and vampiric 1% ownership class use to suck the blood out of 99% of humanity. When will we wake the fuck up and put an end to this ridiculous monstrosity.

Free market crapitalism is right up there in the running with its two close relatives–Mythos religion and scientific materialism–for the deadliest thing to ever befall the human race. Always remember, the insane crapitalists and the insane religious could never doll out the sheer amount of violence they do on a daily basis without the hard work of the robotic scientific materialists backing them up. Free market crapitalism, scientific materialism, and Mythos religion–has there ever been a more unholy triumvirate? It is this irrational and downright evil triumvirate that constitutes the right-wing, and it is this triumvirate that MUST be stopped if humanity is to have any future at all worth living in.

When humanity is at last able to immanentize the eschaton via the study of ontological mathematics, scientific materialism and Mythos religion will become things of the past, just like free market crapitalism, the rich, and all of the traitors who support the rich.

Speaking of traitors who support the rich, let’s not forget about the good old liberals. Liberals were created by the ownership class so that free market consumer crapitalism could flourish. Liberals are out and out free market crapitalists. They are just as dangerous and irrational as their conservative counterparts. None of these “liberal” people seek the destruction of free market crapitalism. No, on the contrary, liberals want to see free market crapitalism stay firmly in place. They can’t get enough of it. They’re junkies and they’re addicted to their junk.

Nothing sums these liberal shit heads up better than a quote from one of their risible leaders–the multi-millionaire Nancy Pelosi. When Pelosi was asked by a college student whether or not the Democratic Party was willing to jettison free market crapitalism because of the massive amount of inequality it NATURALLY creates, she replied: “I have to say, we’re capitalists, that’s just the way it is”. So there you have it, straight from the psychopaths mouth. The so-called liberal Democrats are straight up free market crapitalists. They never have and never will given a single shit for the the People.

So, in a Truly humanitarian society, neither liberals nor conservatives will exist any longer. They will be jettisoned along with their “two” party system of “democratic” free market crapitalism. Of course, there is only one party to vote for in this rigged system, the party of the rich elite. Democrats and Republicans are cut from the exact same motherfucking cloth, the cloth of free market crapitalism. They are all plutocrats, kleptocrats, oligarchs, and kakistocrats

True democracy is immiscible with free market crapitalism. True democracy is all about people power. It is all about the General Will and The Common Good. Free market crapitalism, on the other hand, is all about money power. It is all about the particular wills of the people with the money. It has absolutely no care whatsoever for humanity or the planet. Again, because it simply can’t be said enough: The ONLY thing free market crapitalism cares about is making more and more money for those who already have more money than they could ever possibly need or spend in one thousand lifetimes.

In a truly humanitarian and democratic society, there can be no political parties or factions. Parties and factions serve to divide and fragment a society. They turn what would otherwise be a progressive, united, harmonious, cooperative and far-sighted positive liberty society into a regressive, reactionary, fractured, bellicose, uncooperative and short-sighted negative liberty society. Political parties and factions tear societies apart. All candidates for government office should be independent experts in a particular field that benefits society as a whole.

What I have written in the brief paragraphs above is just a taste of what our New World will be like once we are able to use ontological mathematics to immanentize the eschaton. It will be a New World free form ALL the evils and ills of the past. It will be a New World where humanity has revalued ALL values.

Our New World will produce a Truly just and humanitarian one world global society for the first time in human history. This New Society will be a Truly just and humanitarian society such as the beautiful society described by the Pythagorean Illuminati in all of their many spectacular books. It will be a Truly just and humanitarian society such as the beautiful society described by Jacque Fresco and his awe-inspiring *Venus Project. * It will be a Truly just and humanitarian society such as the beautiful society described by Peter Joseph in his extraordinary new book *The New Human Rights Movement. *It will be a Truly just and humanitarian society such as the beautiful society described and depicted in Gene Roddenberry’s wondrous *Star Trek *stories. I could go on but I think you get the point.

Building Truly progressive, economical, fair, and just societies and economies is really the only thing human beings should be focused on at the moment. We can make no further progress when it comes to exploring, discovering, and learning the Truth of ourselves and our incredible universe (which is the only rational definition of human progress) until we create societies designed for just this purpose. These societies MUST be fair and just to all. They MUST eradicate ALL unnecessary fear, stress, and anxiety within the human race so that people can finally be free to learn, create, discover, progress, grow, and ultimately optimize themselves and their communities.

To immanentize the eschaton is the purpose of humanity. Indeed, it is the purpose of ALL conscious minds within the universe. Shouldn’t we all be working to fulfill our purpose for existing? Isn’t that what we should all be striving towards? Fuck making money. Fuck praying to a psychopathic sky wizard who orders and accepts the sacrifice of human beings. Fuck meditating. Stop wasting time. Get to studying ontological mathematics so that we can finally immanentize the eschaton and create a New World Order where reason, logic, mathematics, creativity, merit, art, wisdom, intelligence, altruism, compassion, and equal opportunity for ALL people rules the day. I’m ready right now to start building heaven here on Earth–are you with me?

**ONTOLOGICAL MATHEMATICS, PYTHAGOREANISM, HYPERIANISM, AND JACOBINISM FOR ALL AND FOREVER!!!**

**Important Links For Ontological Mathematicians, New Jacobins, Hyperians, Progressive Left-Wingers, Rationalists, Pythagorean Illuminists, And Anyone Else Fighting For Social Justice And A Better Future For All Of Humanity
**

The website that introduced humanity to the Truth of the universe: http://armageddonconspiracy.co.uk/

The sacred and revolutionary books of Hyperrationalism, Pythagoreanism, Ontological Mathematics, Social Capitalism, 100% Inheritance Tax, Left Wing Meritocracy, Jacobinism, and SO much more. These are the books that contain the blueprint for a New World Order based on the ontological mathematical Truth of existence. They are Truly the only books that the hard/progressive/rational left need to read:

The books by Mike Hockney: https://www.amazon.com/Mike-Hockney/e/B004KHR7DC/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?qid=1487979156&sr=8-1

The books by Adam Weishaupt: https://www.amazon.com/Adam-Weishaupt/e/B004LXB8GW/ref=ntt_aut_sim_2_1

The books by Michael Faust: https://www.amazon.com/Michael-Faust/e/B004LXBBUA/ref=ntt_aut_sim_2_1

The Pythagorean Illuminati have recently released many new books under a few new pseudonyms. Here is a quick article I wrote that contains links to the new books and author names: https://sacredcause.com/2017/04/06/a-list-of-new-books-written-by-the-pythagorean-illuminati/

The Meritocracy Site: https://www.meritocrats.org/

Facebook contact page for the Pythagorean Illuminati: https://www.facebook.com/pythagorean.illuminati/

*Hyperianism *is a beautiful system of thought based on ontological mathematics. If you seek to lift yourself and all of humanity up to a higher, happier, more fulfilled, more rational, and more compassionate level of existence, then become a Hyperian. Learn more at this amazing website: https://www.hyperianism.com/

A brand new website dedicated to the books by Mike Hockney, Adam Weishaupt, and Micheal Faust. This site was created by people who had their lives changed by the only True religion: Pythagoreanism/ontological mathematics. The purpose of this site is to help bring Pythagoreanism into the public consciousness. The group who created the site is called *The Apollo Institute of Reason *(AIR). Here is a link: http://themeritocracyparty.net/

The amazing Khan Academy website (completely free to use). This site will take you from elementary mathematics all the way through calculus and beyond. I can’t say enough about this site. If you are a burgeoning ontological mathematician like I am, then this is the site for you: https://www.khanacademy.org/

Patrick JMT (just math tutoring) also completely free to use: An excellent site that will add even more to what you are learning on Khan Academy. Some of Patrick’s awesome math videos are now a part of Khan Academy’s math curriculum too! Check it out:

http://patrickjmt.com/

Some very cool blogs, YouTube channels, and websites that are inspired by Pythagoreanism, Hyperianism, Jacobinism, and Ontological Mathematics. Check them out:

http://lejacobin.net/mathematics.html

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgDhHvyV16HSnC0ko6-K3nA

https://hex666blog.wordpress.com/

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIo67yG6r8UGNltuwM10gSA

https://nocelebritiesblog.wordpress.com/

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCk_Xj3Pjrs3X-UMaiSSnPFQ

https://illuminatenorden1776.wordpress.com/

https://enlightenedhumanity.wordpress.com/

https://www.blackspotmutiny.com/

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRr9mh4Z9xiW4F9rC59jdEQ/feed

http://templeofmathematics.com/Mathematicon.html

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2Ute1a5xGvSypIUWFhnlRQ

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2SXdU9VDTaJPbD-N4_iSpg

Links to the amazing work of Peter Joseph, Jacque Fresco, The Zeitgeist Movement, and The Venus Project. The world that these great people are working to create is the same kind of world ontological mathematics is working to create:

https://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/

https://www.thevenusproject.com/

https://www.amazon.com/Peter-Joseph/e/B01N9JUPIC/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?qid=1512145883&sr=8-1

https://www.amazon.com/Jacque-Fresco/e/B001K8WGN0/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?qid=1512146065&sr=8-1

Tags: 100% Inheritance Tax, Abrahamism, Activism, Adam Weishaupt, Alt-Right, Antifa, BJJ, Black Lives Matter, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, Breitbart, Catholicism, Christianity, Content, Definition Of Mathematics, Diverse Monoculture, Dr. Thomas Stark, Dumbocalypse Now: The First Dunning Krugger President, Education, Euler's Formula, Euler's Formula And Special Relativity: The Deep Origins Of Space And Time, Form, Full Retard: The Dumbest Just Got Dumber, Godel Versus Wittgenstein, Godel's Incompleteness Theorems, Hegel, Hypatia, Hyperianism, Illuminati, Illuminism, Immanentize The Eschaton, Immanuel Kant, islam, Jack Tanner, Jacobinism, Joe Dixon, Judaism, Khan Academy, Kill God: The Hunt For The Cosmic War Criminal, Kurt Godel, Left Wing, Left-Wing Meritocracy, Leibniz, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Mark Romel, Mathematical Semantics, Mathematical Synatx, Mathematics, Meritocracy, Michael Faust, Mike Hockney, Mind, Mixed Martial Arts, MMA, Monad, Monadic Mathematics, New World Order, One World Schoolhouse: Education Reimagined, Ontological Mathematics, Philosophy, Plato, Psychophysics, Pythagoras, Pythagorean Illuminati, Pythagorean Illuminism, Pythagorean Illuminism/Ontological Mathematics, Pythagoreanism, Ranty McRanterson, Rational Social Justice Activism, Raţionalism, Science, Science's War On Reason, Scientific Rationalism And Idealism, Self-Defense For Rational Social Justice Activists, Social Capitalism, Social Justice, Soul, Souls, Tags: 100% Inheritance Tax, The Book Of Thought: Mind Matters (The Truth Series Book 6), The Divine Equation, The Forbidden History Of Science, The God Equation, The God Series, The Goddess Equation, The Holographic Soul, The Language Of Reality: The Answer To Existence (The Truth Series Book 4), The Liberty Wars: The Trump Time Bomb, The Mind Equation, The Sacred Books Of The Pythagorean Illuminati, The Soul Equation, The Thinking Universe: Energy Is Thought (The Truth Series Book 3), The Truth Series, The Unit Circle, The War Of The Ghosts And The Machines, Tom Strabo, Transcendental Mathematics, What Is A Thought?: The Ontology Of ThinkingCategories: "The God Series" By Mike Hockney