Vă invit să vă alăturaţi grupului Facebook Mişcarea DACIA, ce-şi propune un alt fel de a face politică!Citiţi partea introductivă şi proiectul de Program, iar dacă vă place, veniţi cu noi !
O puteţi face clicând alături imaginea, sau acest link
Posts Tagged ‘Politically Correctness’
Both are wrong
One of the defining issues of our time is the attitude towards the Other. For the last few decades, the globalist agenda of predatory capitalism – seeking to have maximum markets and thus maximum profits for all capitalist products and services – has demanded maximum migration and acceptance of the Other. This has dialectically generated a nationalist response, with the complete demonization of the Other, summed up in the mantra “Build the Wall” (to keep them out).
Right wingers hate the Other, while liberals roll out the red carpet for the Other. Both are wrong.
We are meritocrats. We don’t care about anyone’s race, sex, sexuality, or background. We do care about their merit. We want the most talented people, regardless of where they come from. What we certainly don’t want – for any country in the world – is an influx of those who subscribe to vile and unacceptable religious beliefs and cultural practices, and have no discernible talents.
Voltaire said, “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” It’s therefore essential for any sane society to wage war on absurd beliefs, not to give them a free pass in the name of multiculturalism and political correctness.
The Liberals – because of their extreme hostility towards judgment – have refused to make any distinction between migrants. They are all accepted equally, regardless of their merits.
We are meritocrats and that means we are all about judgement. If we applied no judgment, how else would we establish who is meritorious? There are no free passes in our system. You have to work hard and achieve. That’s what meritorious people do. We don’t want freeloaders and deadheads. Such people are repulsive, a burden on society. We don’t want people that believe in toxic ancient superstitions.
The Other must be subjected to judgment, just like everyone else. The Other might be the best thing since sliced bread, or something sinister and grotesque. Let’s have the former, and not the latter.
In Europe, every nation has a problem with Islam, an historical enemy of Europe, against which Europe fought many savage wars. The most prominent Muslims – those wearing burqas, hijabs, niqabs, big beards, religious garb – are plainly showing their allegiance and promotion of a religion and culture incompatible with the West, which has sought to conquer the West.
Islam is not compossible with the values of the Western Enlightenment. There has been no Islamic Enlightenment. The two systems cannot coexist. The tragedy is that the politically correct, multicultural, postmodern Liberals believe that they can, and they have inflicted a nightmare on Europe that has resulted in a resurgence of extreme nationalism. They have refused to admit their error and have even doubled down on it. Now we are where we are.
Liberal globalism – based on uncritical acceptance of all religions and cultures in order to advance predatory capitalist interests by keeping costs down (by employing the cheapest workers in the cheapest nations) – must be definitively refuted. Only then can we undermine insane nationalism.
In the Star Trek vision of the future, all of the backward religions and cultures have gone. No one on a starship wears a burqa. Silly beliefs and superstitions WILL die out if humanity promotes reason and logic. In the long run, it’s inevitable. The only alternative is war and extinction.
Star Trek is a dazzling vision of a meritocracy. Let’s make it happen for real. It will never happen if we do not pass judgment on bad ideas, bad opinions, bad beliefs, bad cultures. The Liberals, with their “all truths” system of relativism and subjectivism, refuse to pass judgment. That’s why they must be decisively defeated.
No matter what part of the world you live in, you can apply a standard formula to the Other (i.e. to whoever seeks to come into your country). You should never unconditionally hate the Other as the right-wingers do, or unconditionally love them as the liberals do. You should apply fair and just criteria. Are these migrants good for your country and culture? Do they have merit? If so, why wouldn’t you want to welcome them in? Or are they importing religious beliefs and cultural practices that will create antagonism in your society? If so, why wouldn’t you block them?
Will migrants fit in and improve your society, or will they live in ghettos and undermine the social cohesion of your country? That’s what has to be determined.
We live in a world of compossibilities, not possibilities. You can’t get to do something just because it’s possible. It must be compossible. People must be cognizant of reality, and not keep pushing their own agenda down the throats of others who are never going to accept it. That’s why we are now in such a polarized world. Various groups pushed various agendas that were never going to succeed. People need to restrain themselves, to not expect to get their own way all the time. The general will must prevail, not the particular wills of individuals and groups.
We live in a world of “self-expression” where every identity group believes it has the absolute right for its particular will to prevail. No such right exists.
What do you want – a permanently polarized world where we are all at each other’s throats (as we are now), or a world where we try to achieve a synthesis? That means that we all have to make sacrifices. Unfortunately, in our consumer society where people can buy whatever they want, have whatever they want and say whatever they want, they are no longer capable of denying themselves anything. They will have to learn. As Kafka said, “In man’s struggle against the world, bet on the world.”
We live in a culture devoted to the particular will, but only the general will allows us to live in harmony with each other. The general will demands compromise. How many people are willing to compromise these days?
About MULTICULTURALISM and Tolerating the Intolerance
About MULTICULTURALISM and Tolerating the Intolerance:
What do we understand by the term “multiculturalism”? We see it in terms of relativism, subjectivism, and “all truths”. The basic idea is that all cultures are equally good, equally worthwhile, equally truthful, equally valuable, equally deserving of respect, and that absolutely no one should ever condemn a culture. If they do, so the prevailing thinking goes, they are automatically racist and fascist. “Political correctness” is the tool used to defend multiculturalism. It is politically incorrect, hence unacceptable, to point out the manifest defects of many of the world’s cultures.
Since we are not relativists and subjectivists, and we are not politically correct, we do not hesitate to assert that it is insane not to judge cultures and call out those that are catastrophic for the advance of humanity. Every culture based on mainstream religion has proved disastrous for the world. Just look at the state of today’s world.
We are supporters of a diverse monoculture. The culture we endorse does not even exist in the world at the present time. We want a Logos, Apollonian culture of reason and logic to unite everyone. But beneath that overarching structure, we want everyone to be able to pursue their diverse Dionysian, Mythos pleasures in their own colorful and vivid ways.
Our assertion is that this is the only way to allow humanity to evolve to its next level.
The culture of Islam, for example, offers absolutely no prospect of human advancement. It is an ancient superstition, plagiarized from Judaism, whose sole objective is to get everyone on earth to submit to the god of Mohammed, to accept the Koran as the only worthwhile book in the world, and make everyone obey Sharia Law at the point of the sword. Imagine the whole world under the control of the Islamic State – that was more or less what Mohammed’s regime was like when he invented Islam and managed to bring the Arabs under his dominion.
If you do not stand in absolute condemnation of that culture – a culture that seeks the extermination of all other cultures in order to promote the most degraded vision of an abject humanity kneeling and groveling to an extraterrestrial tyrant – than you are a fellow-traveler, enabler, facilitator, sympathizer and codependent of that culture. And you are our enemy.
The essence of progress is to find and support good ideas and expose and discard bad ideas. Multiculturalism is the politically correct doctrine of extremist liberalism and New Ageism that no idea is ever bad, hence no belief system or cultural practice can ever be condemned.
This is a formula for the total retardation of the human race. Humanity has a huge propensity to succumb to bad ideas, and if no one stands up for good ideas and fights for them, the world will slip back into the Dark Ages and then the primordial swamps.
Already, vast swathes of our world exist in a pre-Enlightenment state. It’s as if advanced ideas simply never took hold in these places. Even a supposedly advanced nation such as the USA is significantly influenced by evangelical Christians, people who have nothing in common with the modern world, and no interest in the modern world. They dream of the Rapture and the Second Coming, not of humans building star fleets and exploring the universe. These people are Creationists who reject evolution, science, philosophy and mathematics, and believe that the Bible is all you need.
They are the essence of backward, failed humanity. We must achieve escape velocity from these cretins. We cannot allow them to retard the evolution of the human race. They have already done enough damage.
Fuck your Messiah. He’s the Dunning-Kruger Messiah.
