Citiţi partea introductivă şi proiectul de Program, iar dacă vă place, veniţi cu noi !

O puteţi face clicând alături imaginea, sau acest link

## Posts Tagged ‘Raţionalism’

## “Nothing” versus Non-existence

“Nothing” versus Non-existence

Perhaps the most misunderstood and problematic concept in human history is the meaning of nothing – void, emptiness, vacuum, space.

The ancient Greeks wrestled endlessly with this concept, but they never managed to produce a definition that resolved the issue once and for all. In fact, no clear-cut definition exists to this day in the scientific world. “Nothing” is particularly difficult for scientific materialists because their ideological position of faith (and “faith” is exactly the right word because scientific materialism is effectively a religion) is that only things that have a size (extension, dimensionality) exist. Existence, for a materialist, is revealed by the human senses. It’s all about empiricism – experience, experiment and observation.

A materialist asserts, in effect, that if our senses were sufficiently acute – in particular our vision – we could “see” and detect everything that exists, no matter how small it is. Everything that exists is physical i.e. it is an entity within space and time. It has dimensions. It has one or more of the following attributes: mass, volume, speed, energy, a wavelength, a frequency. All of these attributes are considered to have meaning only in relation to space and time.

If our senses or our physical, scientific equipment can’t in principle detect something then it is, according to scientists, non-sensical to talk of the thing having any kind of existence. A religious entity such as an immaterial and immortal soul that can’t be detected is regarded as superstitious and fanciful nonsense that can’t be taken seriously rationally or logically. Hence, all consistent scientific materialists are atheists. Those scientists who proclaim religious beliefs are fundamentally dishonest and deluded because atheist materialists are absolutely correct that materialism and religion are as mutually exclusive as existence and non-existence. If scientific materialism is true then religion is false. It’s as simple as that. There’s no scope for souls and, without souls, religion is absurd.

In philosophy, materialists and empiricists have waged an intellectual war against the idealists and rationalists.

It’s critical to have a basic understanding of the positions espoused by these four schools of philosophical thinking:

1) Materialism

2) Empiricism

3) Idealism

4) Rationalism

Materialism and empiricism are natural partners and drive modern science. Idealism and rationalism are also natural partners and put mind above matter. Idealists and rationalists have effectively been defeated by science since they have been unable to compete with its remarkable successes and its predictive and transformative abilities.

That’s where Illuminism comes into the picture. Illuminism is absolutely located within the tradition of idealism and rationalism but what Illuminists realised was that they must also lay claim to materialism and empiricism by showing that these are just subsets of idealism and rationalism.

Illuminism asserts that scientific materialism is perfect for studying the PHYSICAL universe – that’s what it’s designed for – but hopeless at addressing any of the big questions relating to life, mind, consciousness, God, souls and afterlife. All the primary questions of existence can be answered only within the idealist and rationalist context. We will have proved this to you by the end of this series of books and we will doso using the only possible tool – mathematics, the queen of the sciences.

Mathematics, unlike science, is not materialistic or empiricist. It is an expression of rationalism par excellence and it also absolutely in the tradition of idealism. The mathematical domain is nothing other than the perfect manifestation of Plato’s realm of perfect Forms: eternal, immutable, flawless Ideas. Is it not a remarkable thing that mathematics (a tool of ultra Platonic rationalism) is the mainstay of science (a materialist and empiricist ideology)? That ought to have set alarm bells ringing in the loudest possible way for scientific materialists and revealed that there was a catastrophic logical defect in their anti-rationalist approach. But it never has. They have simply ignored this question. In fact, it may never have occurred to them. Scientists in general are staggeringly unphilosophically minded – to their extreme detriment.

Excerpt from The God Game

Mike Hockney

## MATEMATICA – MISTERUL COSMIC

Mathematics: The Cosmic Mystery

Most people are baffled or incredulous when they first come across the concept of ontological mathematics. So, before we even give a description of what ontological mathematics is, we shall address why people are likely to be initially nonplussed or even resistant and hostile to ontological mathematics.

What type of person are you? It’s a fact that your personality type determines your thinking and what you will accept as the answer to existence. You will not be responsive to any answer incompatible with your personality type and the way you relate to the world. As Jung identified, the four basic types are: 1) sensing types, 2) intuitives, 3) feeling types, and 4) thinking types. Sensing and intuition are perceiving functions, while feeling and thinking are judging functions. Intuition is the opposite of sensing, and thinking is the opposite of feeling.

Sensing types are those attracted to answers based on sensory stuff (“matter”). They scoff at any reference to non-sensory stuff. They simply cannot relate to that concept. It automatically seems unreal to them, hence impossible.

Intuitives are the opposite of sensing types, so they typically regard the physical world as some kind of illusion, and are attracted to the concept of an unseen mental whole, which they often refer to as the One, or Cosmic Consciousness, or Universal Mind. Their aim is to be fully absorbed by this blissful unitary mind where all of their problems will vanish.

Feeling types are those attracted to answers that satisfy them emotionally. You cannot have a satisfying emotional relationship with matter, so science is no good to these people. Equally, cosmic consciousness is far too abstract for them. They seek the ultimate satisfying relationship, so they believe in a God of Love, unconditional love, universal love, with whom they can have the supreme loving, personal relationship.

Thinking types do not engage with any of that. They want a rational, logical explanation. They find “matter” intellectually unsatisfying (matter is more or less miraculous since scientists claim that it jumps out of non-existence, for no reason, via no mechanism, as some bizarre product of inexplicable randomness and uncertainty), cosmic consciousness unsatisfying, and an emotional God of love but no rational explanations unsatisfying.

What is the ultimate rational and logical subject? It’s mathematics. For thinking types, then, but for no other types, mathematics is what they look to for answers. Others find mathematics ridiculous. Scientists, who use mathematics all the time, have the most bizarre attitude towards it, regarding it as abstract and “unreal”. Scientists are sensing types and what is real for them is “matter”, and experiments designed to observe matter. They dismiss everything else, including mathematics.

Mystical intuitives can’t stand mathematics. They want to wallow in intuitive visions, meditative and shamanistic experiences. When did the Buddha mention mathematics? When do meditators read mathematics books? Never going to happen.

Since feeling is the opposite of thinking, feeling types especially loathe mathematics and mock any notion that mathematics is the basis of reality.

But here’s the fatal question for the sensing types, the intuitives, and the feeling types: “What is IT made of?” For sensing types, what is matter made of? Is it made of atoms, or electrons, protons and neutrons? What about quarks? What about leptons? What about super symmetric particles? What about probability wavefunctions? How about quantum loops? How about branes? How about strings? How about quantum foam, or “Planck spheres”? How many dimensions are associated with matter? Three, four, ten, eleven, twenty-six, infinite? As soon as you actually try to define matter, the concept disintegrates into gibberish, leaving nothing but extremely complex mathematics such as M-theory, so why not ditch “matter” and turn to analytic mathematics instead, with clear-cut, simple answers? Scientists are empiricists, not rationalists.

What is “cosmic consciousness” made of? What is the Tao made of? What is nirvana made of? What is the One made of? We get a resounding silence from the intuitives. They don’t care. They are not bothered about understanding the ontology and epistemology of cosmic consciousness. They just want to be one with it, to be absorbed by it. Like scientists, they are empiricists, not rationalists.

What about God? As soon as you say that God is made of something then God is rendered subject to the laws of that thing, which therefore becomes more important than God. God cannot defy the laws of whatever he is made of. God cannot perform a “miracle” if it contradicts the laws of whatever God is made of. Quite literally, as soon as you agree that God is made of something, his power vanishes because now it is the thing of which he is made that has all the power. After all, it has the power to make God!

The idea that God is not made of anything is ludicrous. In that case, he couldn’t exist! Yet whenever religious believers refer to God, they NEVER refer to what he is made of, and they would never dream of asking this question because it would destroy their faith. They are compelled to claim that God makes everything, but nothing makes God. Yet the idea that God has no substance – he is made of nothing – makes him non-existent. It’s funny when religious believers claim that God made the world out of nothing since God himself, if he is not made of something, must be made of nothing! Did God summon himself into existence from non-existence? That is the logic of the Bible. Science says the same thing with its claim that the Big Bang erupts out of nothing rather than out of an eternal mathematical Singularity.

These feelings types are, like scientists and mystics, empiricists, not rationalists.

The ultimate ontological question is what could serve as the ontological basis for God, cosmic consciousness and matter alike. What could realistically be proposed as the only thing from which everything could be rationally made? There is only one rational answer – the most rational thing of all, namely mathematics.

Ontological mathematics is, to put it simply, the study of mathematics taken as the basis of existence, i.e. as a real, concrete entity, present everywhere in the universe … as light, or “broken” light. Mathematics is not unreal, it is not abstract, and it is not manmade. It is none other than the eternal language of existence, of Nature, of reality. The sole reason why we live in a rational cosmos is that the cosmos is made not of “stuff”, but of a rational, intelligible language, which exists as light. If reality were not made of language, it could not be intelligible. Only languages are intelligible, and the one and only rationally intelligible language is mathematics.

The universe, despite appearances, is 100% mathematical. The easiest way to approach this idea is to treat mathematics as a two-sided coin. One side concerns mathematical rationalism, i.e. mathematical form, mathematical syntax … mathematics as map, mathematics as unseen noumenon. The other side is mathematical empiricism, i.e. mathematical content, matter, semantics … mathematics as territory, as seen phenomenon.

Rationalist mathematics is the unseen INFORMATION CARRIER. Empirical mathematics is the observed INFORMATION CARRIED. We never experience the carrier under any circumstances. We only experience the information carried.

Think of electricity. All off your gadgets are powered by it, but you never see it and you never interact with it. You interact with the information that the electrically powered gadgets deliver to you. These are impossible without electricity, but absolutely no one thinks of the operations of electricity while they are watching a YouTube video on their smartphone about cats with hats on surfboards.

Ontologically, we replace electricity with mathematics. What is powering everything, including electricity, is mathematics, but we never see it and we never interact with it as it is in itself (as noumenon). We only ever encounter it as phenomenon, as appearance, and its appearance doesn’t seem mathematical in the slightest.

When you watch a YouTube video you are in a sense watching electricity, but you have no idea that this is what you are watching. You engage with electricity as phenomenon – as sensory output – not electricity as noumenon – as the unseen entity powering all of your gadgets.

People are transfixed by appearances because that’s the level at which they actually live. That’s what their experiences are all about. They are not interested in what’s under the hood, all the unseen stuff that holds everything together. Only reason and logic – the opposite of human experiences (which concern sensory perceptions, feelings and mystical intuitions) – take us to the world of non-appearance.

People regard the world of non-appearance as unreal, hence why they regard mathematics as unreal. Here’s the cosmic joke. Whatever you imagine to be the most unreal thing of all, the least likely candidate for what existence is made of, is CERTAIN to be exactly what existence is made of. The cosmic “electricity” is inevitably the opposite of what empiricism would suggest it might be (whether God, matter, randomness, chaos, or cosmic consciousness).

The opposite of empiricism is rationalism, and the subject that defines rationalism is mathematics. Thinking people are people who think mathematically, which is to say rationally. They are right and everyone else is wrong. The other three types are empirical types, ruled by their immediate experiences, whether their sensory perceptions, emotions, or mystical intuitions. These are always taken to be real because they are presented to us without any work on our part. You simply open your eyes and the world pours in. You can’t switch off your feelings. You can’t deny the power of a mystical vision. But you have to work hard to use your reason and logic. That work creates an effect of non-immediacy, which is interpreted as non-reality.

Imagine how differently you would regard mathematics if instead of having to work out answers, you saw answers being presented to you in your mind’s eye, without any effort on your part. There are autistics who can literally see the numbers of pi in their field of vision, and just read off what they see, to thousands of decimal places. If we all had that capacity – if we interacted with mathematics immediately and effortlessly – no one would doubt the ontology of mathematics. We would all take it for granted that we lived in a mathematical universe. But evolution, faced with the choice between quality and quantity, semantics and syntax, has made us empiricists rather than rationalists, which is why the simple-minded reject mathematics as ontological. Imagine playing a video game equipped with a split screen. In one screen, you see the game. In the other screen, you see the code that is being executed each time you do anything in the game. Evolution, via natural selection, decided that a split screen reality was useless to us. What good does it do you in your day-to-day life to see the code that underlies everything? It only matters when you are interested in Absolute Truth. Evolution, certainly in its early stages, has nothing to do with Truth. It’s about survival and reproduction. Only the most highly evolved minds can start to contemplate Absolute Truth. Look around you. How many people have highly evolved minds? Most are closer to apes than gods.

Science helps evolution because it starts to deal with reality quantitatively rather than qualitatively. However, it remains stuck with empiricism rather than rationalism, which is why it will in due course be replaced by ontological mathematics, which reveals the code of existence, the “game code” that we all use.

Here’s the bottom line. We inhabit the world empirically, i.e. we experience it. But the world in itself is rational, and we don’t experience that at all. Rationalism is the opposite of empiricism.

Science, religion, philosophy and spirituality all deal with empirical “reality”. Science is the most successful of these because – drum roll – it’s the only one that uses MATHEMATICS. But science is itself mired in anti-mathematical ideology because it is an empiricist subject rather than a rationalist subject.

Ontological mathematics is what you get when you strip out all empiricist considerations from science, leaving pure mathematical rationalism.

When purely rational and logical considerations are applied to mathematics, i.e. when we deploy the Principle of Sufficient Reason and Occam’s razor to mathematics, we arrive at the “God Equation”, namely Euler’s Formula: the Mind Equation, the Soul Equation, the Life Equation, the God Equation.

The whole of reality is built on complex numbers (rather than real numbers), and revolves around sine waves and cosine waves. These are the ontological electricity – the information carriers that convey every single empirical experience, no matter what, that you encounter every moment of your life.

Mathematics is BOTH a syntactic (rational) and semantic (empirical) subject. We experience mathematics semantically, but the math we are taught at school is strictly syntactic and extremely hard. Human beings are hard-wired to find semantics real and syntax unreal, to find semantics immediate and concrete, and syntax remote and abstract. That’s exactly why most people cannot conceive that mathematics is the true basis of existence. It goes against everything their experience tells them. It is utterly counterintuitive.

Sad to say, you need to be rational and logical to “get it”. But the vast majority of people are neither rational nor logical, and actively hate these subjects. The most feared and loathed subjects on earth are philosophy, science, and mathematics, i.e. the hardest subjects. The degree to which they are hated rises as their mathematical content, hence perceived abstraction and unreality, rises. How many people say, “What does mathematics have to do with my life?” The blunt answer is that mathematics IS your life!!!

The answer to existence is none other than the very thing that humans least desire as the answer to existence, and are least capable of understanding.

You have to laugh. The cosmos has the ultimate sense of humor. Where would you hide the answer to existence to make it almost impossible for humanity to access it? You would of course choose mathematics, the No. 1 most unpopular subject on earth that ordinary people would never go anywhere near. Science is bad enough for most people, but at least it gives you pretty pictures of galaxies. Pure mathematics doesn’t even give you that. It deals with invisible singularities.

Ontological Mathematics is for the most intelligent people on earth. They are the only ones who can understand it. You have no chance of connecting with Ontological Mathematics if you are not a rational and logical person with a craving for absolute Truth.

If you’re not rational and logical, stick to God, cosmic consciousness, matter, or accident and randomness. Stick to prayer (to God), meditation (to get in touch with cosmic consciousness), or sensory experiments (to probe matter). Reason and logic will not serve you. You are not interested in them, and you do not accept their power.

To a rationalist, 1 + 1 = 2 is truer than every statement of religion, philosophy, spirituality and science put together. 1 + 1 = 2 is eternally and necessarily true. Every statement of religion, philosophy, spirituality and science is temporal and contingent. They are mired in belief, opinion and interpretation.

People believe what they want to believe, what their personality type allows them to believe. Mathematics is a system of knowledge, not of belief, and that’s why humanity does not believe in a mathematical universe. Humanity believes in the false “truth”, and refuses to know the actual Truth.

The most mysterious thing in the universe is mathematics, yet it is also the most knowable thing. It is mysterious only because we are empirical beings rather than rational beings. That’s the human tragedy right there.

*****

People are lazy and stupid. That’s why they reject hard, non-immediate answers to existence, and accept simplistic solutions based on immediate feelings, perceptions and intuitions. What are you going to do – pray, meditate, observe … or learn Fourier mathematics? Always follow the path of least resistance. Never put yourself to any trouble. Worship appearances, and never try to get beyond the surface of things. Do you seriously imagine that the answer to existence will present itself to you on a plate? Do you seriously imagine that prayer will reveal it to you, or meditation, or observation? Wake up! Stop being so fucking dumb.

Here’s the news. The universe is either rational or it’s irrational. If it’s rational, mathematics, the quintessence of rationalism, is its answer. If the universe is not rational, any irrational answer is as good as any other irrational answer, so believe whatever you like, which is what you already do … because you’re empirical, i.e. irrational. The very things in which you most trust – your personal experiences – are the very things that stop you from accessing the Truth. It’s the cosmic Catch-22. The Truth lies in reason and logic, BEYOND your experiences, yet all you do is worship your experiences. They are YOUR TRUTH (i.e. your self-delusions).

http://armageddonconspiracy.co.uk/Ontological-Mathematics(3…

## Despre ŞTIINŢA actuală

“Teza centrală a acestei cărți este că știința este o viziune asupra lumii care se naște din autism, de la oameni care ignoră comunicarea, empatia, liberul arbitru, conștiența și toate lucrurile mentale. Lipsa unui psihic puternic se traduce într-o afinitate față de Materie, opusul Minții Ei se simt ca acasă cu teorii care exclud Mintea, care nu necesită nici un fel de componente mentale, pentru că ei înșiși sunt foarte deficienţi în Minte. Agenda intelectuală a lumii a fost confiscată de autisti. Ei controlează Ştiința și Calculul, ce conduc acum lumea. Toți cei din lumea academică se hrănesc acum cu Ideologia lor Anti-Minte. Oamenii chiar cred că Mașinile pot fi la fel de Conștiente ca ființele umane (cum altfel, dacă înşişi oamenii ar fi doar nişte Mașini în opinia lor?) şi că această Conștiență poate fi încărcată în computere și stocată acolo!? Filozofia a fost distrusă de Ştiința autistă. Toți filozofii academici se simt obligaţi de a păstra paradigma științelor și de a nega Realitatea unei lumi de Minți având un Scop. Este timpul ca Oamenii Minţii să denunţe lumea intelectuală autistică, să înlocuiască Materialismul și Empirismul (ideologia Simțurilor) cu Idealism – Raționalismul (doctrina Rațiunii și a Logicii). Raţiunea este esența Minții. Doar Mintea poate Raționa. Dacă sunteți de acord că Existența este Rațională și Inteligibilă, vă aflați pe partea Minții și împotriva Celor Fără Minte (materialiştii, zombii) “.

Această carte este disponibilă și tipărită:

– Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1790959659/

– Kindle: https://www.amazon.com/Science-Conspiracy-Autistics-Took…/…/

“The central thesis of this book is that science is a worldview born from autism, from people who struggle with communication, empathy, free will, consciousness and all things mental. Scientists prefer to see themselves as machines or as products of random chance. Their lack of a strong psyche translates into an affinity for matter, the opposite of mind. They feel at home with theories that exclude mind, that require no mental components whatsoever. That’s because they themselves are enormously deficient in mind.

The intellectual agenda of the world has been seized by autistics. They control science and computing, which now drive the world. Everyone in the academic world now falls into line with their anti-mind ideology. People even believe that machines can be as conscious as human beings (how would that be possible unless humans themselves were just glorified machines?) and that consciousness can be uploaded to computers and stored there.

Philosophy has been destroyed by autistic science. All academic philosophers feel the need to parrot the nostrums of scientism, and to deny the reality of a world of purposeful minds.

It’s time for the People of Mind to strike back, to take back the intellectual world from the autistics, to replace materialism and empiricism (the ideology of the senses) with idealism and rationalism (the doctrine of reason and logic).

Reason is the essence of mind. Only minds can reason. If you agree that existence is rational and intelligible, you are on the side of the mindful and against the mindless (the materialists, the zombies).”

## MY RELIGION IS PYTHAGOREAN ILLUMINISM

# MY RELIGION IS PYTHAGOREAN ILLUMINISM

**A Quick Thank You To The Pythagorean Illuminati And Khan Academy**

“The Singularity is the Cartesian origin. It’s the frequency (mental) domain at the heart of the spacetime (material) domain. You can *never *validly refer to spacetime without also referring to the Singularity. This, in fact, is the whole problem with science. Science, even though it acknowledges the spacetime universe erupting from a Singularity at the Big Bang, then denies the ongoing existence of this Singularity (which in fact goes on controlling spacetime as the Cosmic Mind to the Cosmic Body = universe).”–From the book *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati.

I was recently able to complete all of the lessons and exercises in the differential calculus section of Khan Academy’s AP Calculus BC course (I’m not sure what the hell AP Calculus BC even stands for, but it was the most in depth calculus course on Khan Academy, so it’s the course I’ve been working on), and I couldn’t be more excited! I’m just now beginning my journey into integral calculus, and I’m currently studying the basics of how to use left and right Riemann sums to find the area under a curve. Again, this is all super exciting for me, and I would like to start this blog post off by saying thank you to the Pythagorean Illuminati and Khan Academy. It is thanks to these two groups of hard working meritocrats that I’ve been able to accomplish something I wasn’t sure I was capable of, namely, learning calculus.

I was having a relatively smooth journey through differential calculus and then, as usual, I hit the word problems and my smooth progress became a bit bumpy. Man alive, those calculus word problems were challenging for me. Sometimes it would take me an entire day to solve a single problem. The awesome thing is that I was usually able to find the solution or solutions to those tricky and long problems, and each time I was successful with my answer, it would get me more pumped up than I would be after winning a hard fought Mixed Martial Arts bout. If becoming skilled at mathematics doesn’t get your juices flowing, then either you haven’t read all of the books that comprise Mike Hockney’s *God Series *and Dr. Thomas Stark’s *Truth Series* (i.e. the books written by the Pythagorean Illuminati), or there is simply something wrong with your juices.

Just for a little fun, here is the last problem in the last exercise module in Khan Academy’s differential calculus course that I did before completing the course: “In a restaurant, the daily menu is mounted on wallboard. The printed region with today’s entrees include 216 square inches of text. If there are two-inch margins on the sides and three-inch margins at the bottom and the top, what are the dimensions of the smallest piece of wallboard that can be used for the menu?” Luckily for me, by the time I got to this particular problem I was starting to get the hang of solving these types of calculus word problems, so it only took me hours to solve as opposed to days! In case you’re curious, the smallest possible piece of wallboard that can be used for this restaurant’s menu turned out to be 16 inches by 24 inches. What a cool and fun differential calculus word problem!

Anyway, I’ve been working to be able to learn calculus ever since I was fortunate enough to discover the sacred books of ontological mathematics and Pythagorean Illuminism seven years ago, and completing Differential Calculus on Khan Academy has been a goal of mine for these past seven years. Being able to finally accomplish this goal is absolutely exhilarating for me.

So, to begin with, I would like to say thank you to the Pythagorean Illuminati for everything they have done, and continue to do, for the people of this planet. I want to say thank you to them for teaching me the mathematical Truth of reality. If it weren’t for these brilliant authors and their selfless work, I would never have been able to realize that mathematics defines reality because mathematics *is *reality, and hence I would never have began studying mathematics, which is the greatest and healthiest possible workout a person can do for their mind because mathematics *is *mind.

Studying mathematics is doing for my mind what studying Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu and Mixed Martial Arts does for my body, i.e. mathematics is making my mind stronger and stronger. Seven years ago, I wouldn’t have been able to understand what the definition of a derivative even means (note: in abstract mathematics, derivatives are the focus of differential calculus; they give you the slope of the tangent line to any point on a curve, which can also be thought of as the instantaneous rate of change of a function at any point along its curve), but now, thanks to the Illuminati’s ultra-inspiring work, I have been able to complete the full differential calculus course on Khan Academy, and, as I mentioned above, am just now beginning to learn integral calculus.

Honestly, a few years ago I was slightly intimidated by mathematics, and I wasn’t quite sure that my punch addled brain could even handle higher levels of math like calculus. I say “punch addled” because I was a professional Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) fighter for quite a few years, and over that time I took many a blow to the old noggin.

A quick aside here: As I mentioned above, the practice of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu and Mixed Martial Arts, if done in an intelligent and controlled manner, can be beneficial to a person’s health and well being. They can help make your physical body stronger and healthier. Professional Mixed Martial Arts competition is another story entirely though. Professional Mixed Martial Arts is never intelligent nor controlled, and damage to the physical body (especially the brain from all of the head blows) is inevitable. This damage is accrued through the ridiculous amount of ridiculously rough fight training a fighter does to prepare for a fight, as well as the actual violent fight itself.

If I remember correctly, I ended my MMA competition days with 29 pro MMA bouts, 4 no rules challenge matches at the gym I trained at (these matches were fights where some weirdo or weirdos would come into the gym where I trained from off the street and want to “test” themselves by fighting one of the gym’s trained fighters, which sometimes was me), too many grappling competitions for me to remember, and, last but not least, all of the crazy training that went along with these competitions. It is from all of these martial arts competitions, plus all the competition training and preparation, that the vast majority of my lingering injuries came from. One of the biggest problems I’ve had since I stopped competing in MMA is nasty headaches that occur frequently.

It is because of all the times my brain got raddled around inside of my head that I was slightly concerned about whether or not I would be able to understand and solve calculus problems. These negative thoughts should have never entered my mind. Studying mathematics has been nothing but beneficial for me. So far I have had no problems learning and understanding any of the math concepts I have studied on Khan Academy. I think the damage I did to my brain via too many years spent fighting other human beings in a cage is actually healing up because of mathematics study. I am thinking MUCH clearer than I did prior to finding the work of the Pythagorean Illuminati and ipso facto beginning to truly study mathematics, and my headaches are becoming less painful and less frequent. For this, I cannot thank the Illuminati enough. My brain and I are testament to the universal Truth that the diligent study of True mathematics, reason, and logic (i.e. the diligent study of *ONTOLOGICAL MATHEMATICS*) can literally *heal *the damaged mental state of humanity.

So, one more time because it simply can’t be said enough: Thank you to the Pythagorean Illuminati for everything. You have saved the souls of myself and many other people through your incredible books. Humanity owes you everything. One day in the not too distant future, a rational, intelligent, logical, mathematical, meritocratic, wise, creative, artistic, altruistic, compassionate, brave, strong, and united humanity will celebrate the mentally liberating work of the Pythagorean Illuminati. That day can’t come soon enough.

Before I move along, I would also like to quickly thank the great Sal Khan and his amazing (and free) online school–Khan Academy. This website makes studying mathematics on your own SO much easier. Khan Academy takes a student by the hand and leads her through all of the concepts of mathematics. It lets a student practice and master each concept via its amazing exercise modules, and it does all of this for free.

Khan Academy doesn’t only teach math though. No, it is an entire online educational academy, and you can study almost any subject you’re interested in on it. The site is constantly updated with fresh material and content, and brand new lectures, lessons, and exercise modules are being added to it all the time. I just can’t say enough about this incredible website.

If you are an Illuminist, a Hyperian, an ontological mathematician, a rationalist, a Pythagorean, a Leibnizian, a Hegelian, a Platonist, a reader of Mike Hockney’s *God Series *or Dr. Thomas Stark’s *Truth Series*, or somebody who simply wants to improve your knowledge and understanding of mathematics and science, then Khan Academy is the place for you. I’m a retired MMA fighter with a shitty high school education who started on Khan Academy all the way back at its elementary school mathematics courses (which I could barely remember how to do at the time!), and am now entering integral calculus! It is very exciting! So, if you’ve got free time on your hands and feel like doing some learning, stop by Khan Academy and give it a try. I think you’ll be amazed by the amount of excellent educational content you find there.

**Ontological Mathematics**

“‘Abstract’ mathematicians have no understanding of the greatest tool in mathematics–calculus. Calculus, without reference to Leibnizian monads–is absurd. Leibniz, the discoverer of calculus, and the greatest genius in human history, was the only person who fully understood calculus, and the fact that it must be intrinsically tied to monads. The rest of the matheamtical community, while accepting Leibniz’s notation and basic approach to calculus (bar the monads!) essentially followed Newton’s spacetime (scientific) understanding of calculus.”–From the book *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati.

Since I’m currently in the midst of learning calculus, and it is very much on my mind at the moment, I thought this might be a good time to talk about what it is that calculus is telling us about reality*. *In other words, I would like to take some time to think about the ontological significance of calculus, both differential and integral calculus. But before I get into thinking about ontological calculus specifically, I would first like to talk a little bit about ontological mathematics in general.

Now, it’s super fun (and very handy) to be able to figure out a calculus word problem like the one from Khan Academy I wrote out above. That’s what mathematics does for a conscious mind after all: it strengthens it up to the point that it is able to use math, reason and logic to solve any and all problems concerning reality, no matter how non-mathematical they might seem to be.

But why should this be? I mean, why should mathematics be able to answer *any *questions we humans might come up with concerning space, time, and matter, much less *all *questions? Why is mathematics found absolutely *everywhere* we look? Why is it totally ubiquitous throughout the Cosmos? Why can it be used to describe our entire universe with such pinpoint accuracy? Why do empirical scientific materialists rely on non-sensory mathematics to explain all of their sensory experiments? Why would scientific materialism and empiricism, which purports to study reality via experimentation, completely fall apart without the non-material, non-empirical, non-experimental, and hyper-rational mathematics that underpins it?

I’m not joking in the least when I say that all of life’s most mysterious and important questions will be answered for the human race if we can just pull our collective head out of our collective ass, and at long last see the Truth of mathematics. This sacred and profound Truth has been staring us in the face ever since we became conscious beings inside of the cosmos, indeed, the great Pythagoras intuited and revealed this Truth to us some 2500 years ago. But of course we didn’t listen.

It is precisely because humanity was (and still is) unwilling to listen to the genius words of Pythagoras that it fell victim, over and over again, to evil confidence men and charlatans such as Abraham, Moses, Jesus Christ, Muhammad, the Buddah, etc. Humanity’s dark and sordid past is entirely due to these sick individuals and the evil religions and ideologies they shit out. Throughout our history, these vile religions and irrational systems of thought have ruined our minds, and, along with them, our world. It is precisely because of these ancient, decrepit, idiotic, irrational, and completely *evil*religions that we human beings have NEVER been able to make any kind of connection to the 100% mathematical Truth of the universe.

It is more important now than ever for the human race to discover the Truth of itself and the universe, and this Truth begins and ends with discovering the Truth of mathematics. It is the Truth of mathematics, reason, and logic that will free us all from our self imposed chains, and allow us all to step out of the cave of darkness and complacent ignorance, into the light of knowledge. Seeing all of this, it becomes imperative for humanity to be able to correctly answer the questions concerning mathematics and scientific materialism that I wrote a few paragraphs above. Answering these profound questions correctly is quite literally the most important thing humanity can do for itself at this dark moment in time.

Alright, let’s think for a minute. What are the answers to these most important of questions concerning the origins and ontology of mathematics? Why is mathematics found absolutely *everywhere* in the universe*,* and why does it answer absolutely all questions concerning the universe *perfectly? *Surely you don’t think human scientists and mathematicians *invented* mathematics, do you? If you do think this, then I have a few more questions for you. Which scientist or mathematician invented the number *Pi*? Which scientist or mathematician invented the number *e*? If humans invented math, then why don’t they know where numbers such as Pi and e end? Which scientist or mathematician invented a sine wave? Which scientist or mathematician invented a cosine wave? Which scientist or mathematician invented that the angles of a triangle in Euclidean geometry always add up to 180 degrees? Which scientist or mathematician invented conic sections? Which scientist or mathematician invented the unit circle? Which scientist or mathematician invented the Pythagorean Theorem? Which scientist or mathematician invented Euler’s formula and equation? I could go on and on but I think you get the point.

So, can you tell me which scientist or mathematician invented *anything* at all in mathematics? You can’t because absolutely no scientist or mathematician ever has, or ever *could, *invent anything in mathematics. The only thing about mathematics that human scientists and mathematicians have ever “invented” is all of the fallacious and false ways that humanity, as a species, has come to *define* and *interpret* mathematics; ways entirely predicated on the fallible and dysfunctional human sensory apparatus and human sensory experiments; ways such as the tedious and boring *Set Theory *of conventional, abstract mathematics. And we wonder why most kids have no interest in studying math at school.

Let’s get this straight right now: It’s absolutely IMPOSSIBLE for any mind, human or otherwise, to invent ANYTHING in mathematics. So again I ask you: Why is mathematics perfect for solving all problems, and why does it completely saturate our universe? There can only be one answer to these life changing questions, and that answer is that humans don’t *invent *mathematics, they *discover *it.

Humanity *discovers *mathematics all throughout the cosmos precisely because space, time, matter, and indeed the entire universe, are completely derived from, made out of, and created by mathematics. Mathematics is eternal. It is the permanent foundation that reality is built on top of. Mathematics *is *reality. This is why mathematics explains EVERYTHING. It even explains all of the things you mistakenly think are inexplicable–things such as the soul and the afterlife. In fact, once you understand mathematics the way it’s supposed to be understood, i.e. ontologically, seemingly supernatural things such as the aforementioned soul and afterlife become as natural as 1+1=2.

A proper understanding of mathematics will bring humanity a proper understanding of religion. Absolutely all of the questions of religion can be definitively answered by mathematics. This is why mathematics, when properly understood by humanity, will totally free us from the mental prison built by all of our deadly, story based religions (including the story based religions of free market capitalism and its good buddy scientific materialism). Once humanity collectively discovers the Truth of mathematics, it will ipso facto become a liberated species.

The Truth of mathematics is that it is ontological. It is *real. *It is *all* that is real. It completely defines what can actually be *known*. Mathematics IS ontology AND epistemology. Mathematics IS science. Physics comes from mathematics, chemistry comes from physics, and biology comes from chemistry. Do you see how everything is based on mathematics?

Mathematics is the basis and foundation of ALL science. It is the basis and foundation of ALL philosophy. It is the basis and foundation of ALL psychology. It is the basis and foundation of ALL thought. It is the basis and foundation of ALL emotions. It is the basis and foundation of ALL sensations. Mathematics is the eternal, necessary, complete, and consistent basis and foundation of *REALITY. * This is why mathematics is found absolutely everywhere we look in the universe, and it is why mathematics perfectly answers all questions about the universe. The universe is literally *made *out of mathematics because it *is *mathematics.

**Pythagorean Illuminism = The Study Of Ontological Mathematics**

“‘Spacetime (material) calculus is formally false. Only spacetime calculus grounded in frequency (mental) calculus is valid, i.e. calculus must be underpinned by monadic frequency domains located in a Singularity, sited at the origin of the Cartesian coordinate grid. All calculus processes must refer to this invisible Singularity.”–From the book *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati.

Pythagorean Illuminism is my religion. It is the philosophy and ideology that guides my life. Pythagorean Illuminism is a religion, philosophy, and ideology that is entirely unlike any other religion, philosophy, or ideology out there. You see, Pythagorean Illuminism is the world’s only Logos religion. This means it is a religion that uses math, science, reason, and logic to understand what is going on in the universe as opposed to stories. Story based religions are Mythos religions, and they currently rule our world. Pythagorean Illuminism is a religion, philosophy, and ideology that is fully based on mathematics, reason and logic, and it contends that mathematics, when interpreted and understood properly, perfectly answers each and every question concerning the universe and reality.

In Pythagorean Illuminsim, True mathematics, i.e. the mathematics of reality, is called *ontological mathematics* (alternatively it is termed *Illuminism, **Hyperianism,* *mathematical idealism*, *scientific rationalism and idealism*, *wave mathematics, monadic mathematics, *or *transcendental mathematics*), and it is ontological mathematics that forms the unbreakable foundation that the religion of Pythagorean Illuminism is built on top of. Absolutely all other religions, philosophies, and ideologies found on this planet are, in one way or another, based on Mythos, i.e. they are based on irrational and absurd *stories, *hence they are ALL FALSE. Stories don’t and can’t explain, define, or create anything, only mathematics can do that, therefore: Pythagorean Illuminism is THE ONLY TRUE RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY, AND IDEOLOGY BAR NONE, period.

Ontological mathematics is the study of mathematics *as* reality, and Pythagorean Illuminism is the study of ontological mathematics. Pythagorean Illuminism and ontological mathematics have been introduced to the world by a team of brilliant writers. These writers are experts at rational and logical thinking, i.e. they are experts in mathematics, science, philosophy, and psychology, and their work 100% reflects this fact. This genius writing team is a communication cell of the most enigmatic secret society to ever exist on this planet: The Pythagorean Illuminati.

This single communication cell of the Illuminati has written many different books and many different book series, all of which are available for purchase on *Amazon *(note: for those who are interested, I have left links to the Pythagorean Illuminati’s *Amazon *author pages at the end of this blog post). The writing team writes using a few different pseudonyms. If you’re ever confused about whether or not a book is an official book of the Pythagorean Illuminati and ontological mathematics, then check the *Amazon* author pages or head on over to the Illuminati’s amazing website where a full list of their books can be found. The official website of the Pythagorean Illuminati is http://www.armageddonconspiracy.co.uk/

If you’re fucking sick and tired of the self serving lies being vomited out on a daily basis by all of humanity’s Mythos religions, Mythos political parties, Mythos philosophies, and Mythos ideologies, then you might be a human being who is receptive to the Truth of reality, i.e. you might be a human being who is receptive to Pythagorean Illuminism = Ontological Mathematics. If this is you, then become an Illuminist. Go out and pick up your first book by the Pythagorean Illuminati and prepare to come face to face with your *Soul.*

**Ontological Calculus**

“We need a brand new understanding of the Cartesian coordinate grid. It needs to have an ontological Singularity–a Mind–placed at its origin. The Singularity is the Fourier frequency domain, and the rest of the grid the Fourier spacetime domain. The Big Bang is nothing but a Fourier process creating spacetime from the frequency Singularity (the Cartesian origin). The Cartesian grid must be replaced by the Fourier-Cartesian grid, reflecting frequency as well as spacetime.”–From the book *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati.

Please note that I will be performing some calculus and some ontological interpretations of calculus in this next section of my blog post. Any mathematical or philosophical mistakes I make in this section are entirely my own, and have nothing to do with the work of the Pythagorean Illuminati.

If you would like a detailed look at ontological calculus written by experts and not an ex-MMA fighter, then I would advice you to read *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati. This book contains invaluable information concerning ontological calculus, and it was the inspiration for this blog post.

I’m currently reading *How to Create the Universe* again because of my recent calculus studies, and it’s helping me to get the hang of the differences between abstract calculus and ontological calculus. These differences revolve around the real existence of the hyper-rational Monadic Collective Singularity, i.e. the Cosmic Mind, i.e. MATHEMATICS AS IT TRULY IS, which is situated at the exact center of the universe. Of course, abstract mathematics and empirical scientific materialism both deny the existence of any such universe controlling Mind, which is exactly why abstract mathematics and scientific materialism are ultimately *irrational* subjects.

Here is a link to *How to Create the Universe* for anyone who is interested:

Now back to calculus. At the top of one of the previous segments of this blog post, before I veered off and started ranting about idiotic and evil Mythos religion (which I tend to do a lot!), I mentioned I wanted to think a little bit about the ontological significance of calculus. Now, as you can probably imagine, calculus, both differential and integral, plays a HUGE roll in the workings of the universe and reality. In fact, calculus and Fourier wave mathematics explain and define absolutely ALL of reality.

We are all here in space and time. This means we are all currently inhabiting a dimensional domain of what scientific materialists term *matter. *Contrary to what mainstream science says, the domain of space and time is a six dimensional domain consisting of three real/space dimensions and three imaginary/time dimensions. But where do these space and time dimensions derive from? Rationally, non-dimensionality is the only thing that can exist. So where does dimensionality come from? Or, to be a bit more precise, where does the 100% mathematically defined *illusion* of dimensionality come from? Further, once spacetime dimensionality is established within the cosmos, how does it (i.e. dimsionality) return to non-dimensionality? In other words, how does the *Big Crunch *produce the *Big Bang, *and similarly, how does the *Big Bang *in turn produce the *Big Crunch? *This is where differential and integral calculus come into play.* *

You see calculus, when understood properly and ontologically, is precisely what allows *dimensionality *to be added to and subtracted from reality. The preeminent philosophers and ontological mathematicians, Mike Hockney and Dr. Thomas Stark (a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati), refer to calculus as a *dimensionality stepladder. *This ingenious metaphor helps out tremendously when trying to visualize what is happening mathematically within the universe.

Calculus is the controller of dimensionality. Calculus shows us how the Monadic Collective Singularity (i.e. the collection of all our individual minds/souls, which exist outside of space and time within a zero-dimension domain of pure light) mathematically creates and adds dimensionality to reality via integration (which is studied in integral calculus), and how it mathematically erases and subtracts dimensionality from reality via differentiation (which is studied in differential calculus).

This can all be gleaned by studying calculus with an eye for ontology (i.e. studying calculus after studying the work of the Pythagorean Illuminati). When you look at calculus ontologically, you can begin to get an idea of what is going on in the universe. Let’s take a few minutes to think about differentiation (subtracting dimensions) and integration (adding dimensions), and what they are telling us about reality.

Let’s first take a look at differentiation. To be simple, let’s take the expression x cubed (i.e. x^3), which is graphed above, and let’s see what happens when we differentiate it a few times. Before we differentiate this thing, let’s say that x^3 is some sort of dimensional expression of mathematics. For now, it doesn’t matter what x^3 ontologically *is* within the domain of dimensionality, it just matters that we are thinking of this expression as a dimensional expression.

Now, when we differentiate x^3 once, we end up with 3x squared (i.e. 3x^2) as a solution. After our first differentiation, we can see that we have went from an expression raised to the third power to an expression raised to the second power. Continuing along, we can go ahead and differentiate 3x^2 next, i.e. we can differentiate our original expression x^3 for a second time. When we do this, we end up with 6x as a solution. We can see that, after this second differentiation, we again decremented our exponent by one. Now, if we differentiate our original expression x^3 for a third time, i.e. if we differentiate 6x, we end up with the number 6 as a solution. We can again see that differentiation has caused our original function’s exponent to be decremented by one (x^0 = 1, so 6 = 6x^0), and we are now left with a constant as a solution.

But the constant 6 isn’t the end of the line. No, it can still be differentiated one more time. In abstract calculus, when we perform our fourth and final differentiation of x^3 via differentiating the constant 6, we find that we end up at zero. Now, when I was first learning this on Khan Academy, I didn’t remember what was written in *How to Create the Universe *about how the differentiation of a constant in ontological calculus differs from the differentiation of a constant in abstract calculus. I originally thought that the differentiation of a constant being zero meant that ontologically, at that point in time, the mathematical function had lost all dimensionality and returned back to the Monadic Collective, which is a zero dimension Fourier frequency domain outside of space and time.

However, I’m now currently rereading *How to Create the Universe, *and I’m seeing that the way abstract calculus differentiates a constant is incorrect. The zero result of abstract calculus isn’t referring to ontological, dynamic, and full zero (i.e. the Monadic Collective) at all. No, the zero result of abstract calculus is referring to abstract, static, and empty zero, which equates to nonexistence, which, by definition, doesn’t exist. The zero result of abstract calculus means absolutely nothing, hence is non-ontological, hence is pointless.

In ontological calculus, when a dimensional constant such as 6 is differentiated, it doesn’t become nothing. This would constitute a loss of information which equates to the destruction of *energy. *The destruction of energy is impossible. Energy can neither be created nor destroyed, it is eternal. The only thing you can do with energy is rearrange it in infinite ways. So again, in ontological calculus, when a dimensional constant within space and time is differentiated, it doesn’t become nothing; no, on the contrary, it becomes a dimensionless constant outside of space and time, within the domain of frequency. So if we were to differentiate our example constant of *dimensional *spacetime 6, it would produce a constant of *dimensionless* frequency 6 as a result.

A return to frequency equates to a return to the Cosmic Mind, i.e. a return to the Monadic Collective Singularity outside of space and time. A return to frequency equates to a return to dynamic, ontological, full zero, which is the origin of mathematics and the *container *for absolutely everything. A return to frequency equates to a return to pure *Light.*

Do you see what just happened here? We went from a relatively complicated, dimensional expression like x^3, and, through the mathematical operation of differentiation, we ended up back at ontological zero, i.e. the Monadic Collective. In other words, if we equate the mathematical expression x^3 to something that exists ontologically and dimensionally within space and time, then we can see that differentiation allows us to continuously subtract dimensions until we arrive back at the frequency domain of dynamic and full zero. In still other words, via differentiation, we were able to take an n-dimensional thing and turn it into a zero dimensional thing. Such is the power of calculus.

Ontological zero is the origin of everything. Ontological zero is the home of the mind, the soul, and the entire Monadic Collective. Ontological zero *is *the Monadic Collective. Ontological zero is the container for ALL of mathematics, hence it is the container for *reality*. Ontological zero is how mathematics actually exists within the universe. Ontological zero is the origin of mathematics, hence it is the origin of *everything.* Ontological zero is the absolute Truth of the universe, and it explains everything about the universe.

Next, since I still have a lot of work left to do in the abstract integral calculus course on Khan Academy, let’s just take a very quick look at ontological integral calculus. Integral calculus is the reverse of differential calculus. Where differentiation moves us down the dimensionality stepladder, integration moves us up it. It is via ontological integration that the universe adds mathematical dimensionality to itself.

Integration can be thought of as the summing up of an infinite number of infinitesimally small things, things such as the Myriad ontological flowing point particles which, via their perfect circular trajectories, trace out eternal and ontological unit circles outside of space and time. These Myriad point particles form the Myriad monads which form the Monadic Collective Singularity of pure light, which, once again, is located outside of space and time. Ontological integration is the mathematical operation that controls the *Big Bang *that scientific materialism likes to talk about. This operation can be seen at the very beginning of integral calculus when you first start to learn about Riemann sums.

The idea of integration and the integral is tied closely to the notion of differentiation and the derivative. Where differentiation allows us to take a dimensional, spacetime function and differentiate it to find its zero dimension, frequency function derivative, integration allows us to first start with a zero dimension, frequency function derivative, and then, via the operation of integration, discover the original function whose derivative it is (i.e. integration allows us to find a derivative’s anti-derivative). In other words, ontological differential calculus takes something in space and time and returns it to frequency, while ontological integral calculus takes something out of frequency and places it inside of space and time (though in Truth nothing is ever actually able to leave frequency; the feeling of being in a material body within space and time is a mathematically generated *illusion*).

With left and right Riemann sums, we can begin to get an inkling of how the universe builds something out of “nothing”. In integral calculus, a Riemann sum allows us to discover the area under a curve. This area is created, as I mentioned above, by the summing up of an infinite number of infinitesimally small things. If we equate the area under a curve to a dimensional something, and if we equate the infinite number of infinitesimally small things to dimensionless somethings (i.e. *nothings*), then we can begin to see how integration adds dimsionality to reality, and eventually creates the whole universe of space, time and matter.

So, to recapitulate this section. Ontological calculus is a stepladder leading from non-dimension to dimension, and back again. Via integration, calculus allows us to add dimensionality. This adding of dimensionality through integration equates to the *Big Bang. *Integration is what allows the dimensionless, Monadic Collective Singularity of pure frequency outside of space and time to expand itself (i.e. to add dimensions to itself) into the six dimensional domain of space and time that we all are currently inhabiting.

Via differentiation, calculus allows us to subtract dimensions until we return to a dimensionless, frequency existence. If the adding of dimensions through integration equates to a Big Bang, then the subtracting of dimensions through differentiation equates to a Big Crunch*. *Ontological differentiation is the compression of space, time and matter back into the dimensionless Singularity from whence they came. It is when the dimensionless, Monadic Collective Singularity outside of space and time decides to fold itself back up, and compress all of its dimensions back into ontological zero.

Differentiation and integration are constantly in operation throughout the universe, and together they form the feedback loop which we call mind and matter. As Mike Hockney says in *How to Create the Universe*: “Calculus is a process linking mind to matter”. Once humanity understands everything there is to know about ontological calculus, it will ipso facto understand everything there is to know about mind, matter, life, and so-called “death”.

So, as you can see, if you want all of the answers to the universe, you have no other choice but to study mathematics ontologically, and this all begins with studying the work of the Pythagorean Illuminati. One day soon, ontological mathematics will usher in the golden age of the human race. That day can’t arrive fast enough.

**Ontological Mathematics Will Immanentize The Eschaton**

“Descartes himself was certain of the existence of unextended, dimensionless thinking substance, yet it does not feature at all in his own Cartesian grid. This can be rectified at a stroke by replacing the “empty” Cartesian origin with a Fourier frequency domain: a Singularity composed of countless monads, each of which is a self-contained frequency domain = a mind, a soul.”–From the book *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati.

The sooner the entire human race discovers and integrates ontological mathematics into their lives, the sooner we will all be free from the mental cages we have created for ourselves. Once we have freed ourselves from our self imposed fetters–fetters that are keeping us all locked inside of good old Plato’s cave of ignorance–via the study of ontological mathematics, Illuminism, and Hyperianism, we will finally be able to understand the True meaning of the words *freedom *and *liberty. *At that point in time, humanity will at long last be in a position to *immanentize the eschaton*.

What does *immanentize the eschaton *mean? Well, it means creating heaven right here on Earth. Ontological mathematics is THE ONLY subject that will allow us human beings to create heaven on Earth for ALL people. It is THE ONLY subject that will allow us to finally be able to effectuate a Truly humanitarian society.

This humanitarian society would be a society that is at last free from the poisons of classism, racism, sexism, and homophobia.

It would be a society that is at last free from the evil 1%, a.k.a. the Old World Order, a.k.a. the ownership class, a.k.a. the elite, a.k.a. the biggest shit heads ever.

It would be a society that is at last free from the legions of idiotic, irrational, racist, sexist, homophobic, and troglodytic supporters of the psychopathic ownership class. Come on, you know the “people” I’m talking about. These are the army of greedy scum bags who would love nothing more than to have Donald “grab them by the pussy” Trump’s shriveled up orange dick stuffed down their throats. I’m of course talking about the traitorous lunatics we have euphemistically termed the* right-wing. *

A truly humanitarian society would be a society that is at last free from the anti-economic system hilariously called *free market capitalism.* Destructive, exploitative, wasteful, and oppressive free market crapitalism isn’t an economic system at all. How could it be? Economic systems are supposed to be *economical. *They’re supposed to be completely efficient systems that produce as close to zero waste and pollution as possible. They’re supposed to work in harmony with the planet and the environment. They’re supposed to be clear thinking, rational and logical systems that are fair and just to ALL. They’re supposed to be altruistic systems that work exclusively for the General Will of the People, and not for any particular human wills. They’re supposed to be built around reason, logic, and empirical evidence, all aimed at creating the most just and efficient human society possible. This is what True economic systems are supposed to be like.

True economic systems are absolutely not supposed to be like free market crapitalism. That is, they’re absolutely not supposed to be hyper-emotional, inefficient, wasteful, gluttonous, pollution and poison producing, violent machines of death and devastation *designed* to benefit only 1% of society at the expense of EVERYTHING else. This is why free market crapitalism is the exact opposite of a True economic system. It is the evil twin of a True economic system. It is what an economic system would look like on Bizarro World. It is what Peter Joseph calls a *plutonomy *(i.e. an economy controlled by the rich). It is an anti-economic system of the highest order, and it is destroying our world.

In truth, free market crapitalism is nothing more than a rigged game, a game created by and for the wealthy so that they can continue to rob the poor and impoverished, just as they have always done. Free market crapitalism is simply the latest (and greatest) ploy by the avaricious, rapacious, and insane rich to further line their own pockets. Free market crapitalism is the exact means the parasitical and vampiric 1% ownership class use to suck the blood out of 99% of humanity. When will we wake the fuck up and put an end to this ridiculous monstrosity.

Free market crapitalism is right up there in the running with its two close relatives–Mythos religion and scientific materialism–for the deadliest thing to ever befall the human race. Always remember, the insane crapitalists and the insane religious could never doll out the sheer amount of violence they do on a daily basis without the hard work of the robotic scientific materialists backing them up. Free market crapitalism, scientific materialism, and Mythos religion–has there ever been a more unholy triumvirate? It is this irrational and downright evil triumvirate that constitutes the right-wing, and it is this triumvirate that MUST be stopped if humanity is to have any future at all worth living in.

When humanity is at last able to immanentize the eschaton via the study of ontological mathematics, scientific materialism and Mythos religion will become things of the past, just like free market crapitalism, the rich, and all of the traitors who support the rich.

Speaking of traitors who support the rich, let’s not forget about the good old liberals. Liberals were created by the ownership class so that free market consumer crapitalism could flourish. Liberals are out and out free market crapitalists. They are just as dangerous and irrational as their conservative counterparts. None of these “liberal” people seek the destruction of free market crapitalism. No, on the contrary, liberals want to see free market crapitalism stay firmly in place. They can’t get enough of it. They’re junkies and they’re addicted to their junk.

Nothing sums these liberal shit heads up better than a quote from one of their risible leaders–the multi-millionaire Nancy Pelosi. When Pelosi was asked by a college student whether or not the Democratic Party was willing to jettison free market crapitalism because of the massive amount of inequality it NATURALLY creates, she replied: “I have to say, we’re capitalists, that’s just the way it is”. So there you have it, straight from the psychopaths mouth. The so-called liberal Democrats are straight up free market crapitalists. They never have and never will given a single shit for the the People.

So, in a Truly humanitarian society, neither liberals nor conservatives will exist any longer. They will be jettisoned along with their “two” party system of “democratic” free market crapitalism. Of course, there is only one party to vote for in this rigged system, the party of the rich elite. Democrats and Republicans are cut from the exact same motherfucking cloth, the cloth of free market crapitalism. They are all plutocrats, kleptocrats, oligarchs, and kakistocrats

True democracy is immiscible with free market crapitalism. True democracy is all about people power. It is all about the General Will and The Common Good. Free market crapitalism, on the other hand, is all about money power. It is all about the particular wills of the people with the money. It has absolutely no care whatsoever for humanity or the planet. Again, because it simply can’t be said enough: The ONLY thing free market crapitalism cares about is making more and more money for those who already have more money than they could ever possibly need or spend in one thousand lifetimes.

In a truly humanitarian and democratic society, there can be no political parties or factions. Parties and factions serve to divide and fragment a society. They turn what would otherwise be a progressive, united, harmonious, cooperative and far-sighted positive liberty society into a regressive, reactionary, fractured, bellicose, uncooperative and short-sighted negative liberty society. Political parties and factions tear societies apart. All candidates for government office should be independent experts in a particular field that benefits society as a whole.

What I have written in the brief paragraphs above is just a taste of what our New World will be like once we are able to use ontological mathematics to immanentize the eschaton. It will be a New World free form ALL the evils and ills of the past. It will be a New World where humanity has revalued ALL values.

Our New World will produce a Truly just and humanitarian one world global society for the first time in human history. This New Society will be a Truly just and humanitarian society such as the beautiful society described by the Pythagorean Illuminati in all of their many spectacular books. It will be a Truly just and humanitarian society such as the beautiful society described by Jacque Fresco and his awe-inspiring *Venus Project. * It will be a Truly just and humanitarian society such as the beautiful society described by Peter Joseph in his extraordinary new book *The New Human Rights Movement. *It will be a Truly just and humanitarian society such as the beautiful society described and depicted in Gene Roddenberry’s wondrous *Star Trek *stories. I could go on but I think you get the point.

Building Truly progressive, economical, fair, and just societies and economies is really the only thing human beings should be focused on at the moment. We can make no further progress when it comes to exploring, discovering, and learning the Truth of ourselves and our incredible universe (which is the only rational definition of human progress) until we create societies designed for just this purpose. These societies MUST be fair and just to all. They MUST eradicate ALL unnecessary fear, stress, and anxiety within the human race so that people can finally be free to learn, create, discover, progress, grow, and ultimately optimize themselves and their communities.

To immanentize the eschaton is the purpose of humanity. Indeed, it is the purpose of ALL conscious minds within the universe. Shouldn’t we all be working to fulfill our purpose for existing? Isn’t that what we should all be striving towards? Fuck making money. Fuck praying to a psychopathic sky wizard who orders and accepts the sacrifice of human beings. Fuck meditating. Stop wasting time. Get to studying ontological mathematics so that we can finally immanentize the eschaton and create a New World Order where reason, logic, mathematics, creativity, merit, art, wisdom, intelligence, altruism, compassion, and equal opportunity for ALL people rules the day. I’m ready right now to start building heaven here on Earth–are you with me?

**ONTOLOGICAL MATHEMATICS, PYTHAGOREANISM, HYPERIANISM, AND JACOBINISM FOR ALL AND FOREVER!!!**

**Important Links For Ontological Mathematicians, New Jacobins, Hyperians, Progressive Left-Wingers, Rationalists, Pythagorean Illuminists, And Anyone Else Fighting For Social Justice And A Better Future For All Of Humanity
**

The website that introduced humanity to the Truth of the universe: http://armageddonconspiracy.co.uk/

The sacred and revolutionary books of Hyperrationalism, Pythagoreanism, Ontological Mathematics, Social Capitalism, 100% Inheritance Tax, Left Wing Meritocracy, Jacobinism, and SO much more. These are the books that contain the blueprint for a New World Order based on the ontological mathematical Truth of existence. They are Truly the only books that the hard/progressive/rational left need to read:

The books by Mike Hockney: https://www.amazon.com/Mike-Hockney/e/B004KHR7DC/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?qid=1487979156&sr=8-1

The books by Adam Weishaupt: https://www.amazon.com/Adam-Weishaupt/e/B004LXB8GW/ref=ntt_aut_sim_2_1

The books by Michael Faust: https://www.amazon.com/Michael-Faust/e/B004LXBBUA/ref=ntt_aut_sim_2_1

The Pythagorean Illuminati have recently released many new books under a few new pseudonyms. Here is a quick article I wrote that contains links to the new books and author names: https://sacredcause.com/2017/04/06/a-list-of-new-books-written-by-the-pythagorean-illuminati/

The Meritocracy Site: https://www.meritocrats.org/

Facebook contact page for the Pythagorean Illuminati: https://www.facebook.com/pythagorean.illuminati/

*Hyperianism *is a beautiful system of thought based on ontological mathematics. If you seek to lift yourself and all of humanity up to a higher, happier, more fulfilled, more rational, and more compassionate level of existence, then become a Hyperian. Learn more at this amazing website: https://www.hyperianism.com/

A brand new website dedicated to the books by Mike Hockney, Adam Weishaupt, and Micheal Faust. This site was created by people who had their lives changed by the only True religion: Pythagoreanism/ontological mathematics. The purpose of this site is to help bring Pythagoreanism into the public consciousness. The group who created the site is called *The Apollo Institute of Reason *(AIR). Here is a link: http://themeritocracyparty.net/

The amazing Khan Academy website (completely free to use). This site will take you from elementary mathematics all the way through calculus and beyond. I can’t say enough about this site. If you are a burgeoning ontological mathematician like I am, then this is the site for you: https://www.khanacademy.org/

Patrick JMT (just math tutoring) also completely free to use: An excellent site that will add even more to what you are learning on Khan Academy. Some of Patrick’s awesome math videos are now a part of Khan Academy’s math curriculum too! Check it out:

http://patrickjmt.com/

Some very cool blogs, YouTube channels, and websites that are inspired by Pythagoreanism, Hyperianism, Jacobinism, and Ontological Mathematics. Check them out:

http://lejacobin.net/mathematics.html

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgDhHvyV16HSnC0ko6-K3nA

https://hex666blog.wordpress.com/

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIo67yG6r8UGNltuwM10gSA

https://nocelebritiesblog.wordpress.com/

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCk_Xj3Pjrs3X-UMaiSSnPFQ

https://illuminatenorden1776.wordpress.com/

https://enlightenedhumanity.wordpress.com/

https://www.blackspotmutiny.com/

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRr9mh4Z9xiW4F9rC59jdEQ/feed

http://templeofmathematics.com/Mathematicon.html

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2Ute1a5xGvSypIUWFhnlRQ

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2SXdU9VDTaJPbD-N4_iSpg

Links to the amazing work of Peter Joseph, Jacque Fresco, The Zeitgeist Movement, and The Venus Project. The world that these great people are working to create is the same kind of world ontological mathematics is working to create:

https://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/

https://www.thevenusproject.com/

https://www.amazon.com/Peter-Joseph/e/B01N9JUPIC/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?qid=1512145883&sr=8-1

https://www.amazon.com/Jacque-Fresco/e/B001K8WGN0/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?qid=1512146065&sr=8-1

Tags: 100% Inheritance Tax, Abrahamism, Activism, Adam Weishaupt, Alt-Right, Antifa, BJJ, Black Lives Matter, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, Breitbart, Catholicism, Christianity, Content, Definition Of Mathematics, Diverse Monoculture, Dr. Thomas Stark, Dumbocalypse Now: The First Dunning Krugger President, Education, Euler's Formula, Euler's Formula And Special Relativity: The Deep Origins Of Space And Time, Form, Full Retard: The Dumbest Just Got Dumber, Godel Versus Wittgenstein, Godel's Incompleteness Theorems, Hegel, Hypatia, Hyperianism, Illuminati, Illuminism, Immanentize The Eschaton, Immanuel Kant, islam, Jack Tanner, Jacobinism, Joe Dixon, Judaism, Khan Academy, Kill God: The Hunt For The Cosmic War Criminal, Kurt Godel, Left Wing, Left-Wing Meritocracy, Leibniz, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Mark Romel, Mathematical Semantics, Mathematical Synatx, Mathematics, Meritocracy, Michael Faust, Mike Hockney, Mind, Mixed Martial Arts, MMA, Monad, Monadic Mathematics, New World Order, One World Schoolhouse: Education Reimagined, Ontological Mathematics, Philosophy, Plato, Psychophysics, Pythagoras, Pythagorean Illuminati, Pythagorean Illuminism, Pythagorean Illuminism/Ontological Mathematics, Pythagoreanism, Ranty McRanterson, Rational Social Justice Activism, Raţionalism, Science, Science's War On Reason, Scientific Rationalism And Idealism, Self-Defense For Rational Social Justice Activists, Social Capitalism, Social Justice, Soul, Souls, Tags: 100% Inheritance Tax, The Book Of Thought: Mind Matters (The Truth Series Book 6), The Divine Equation, The Forbidden History Of Science, The God Equation, The God Series, The Goddess Equation, The Holographic Soul, The Language Of Reality: The Answer To Existence (The Truth Series Book 4), The Liberty Wars: The Trump Time Bomb, The Mind Equation, The Sacred Books Of The Pythagorean Illuminati, The Soul Equation, The Thinking Universe: Energy Is Thought (The Truth Series Book 3), The Truth Series, The Unit Circle, The War Of The Ghosts And The Machines, Tom Strabo, Transcendental Mathematics, What Is A Thought?: The Ontology Of ThinkingCategories: "The God Series" By Mike Hockney

## Illuminati (19)

**CASTALIA**

**Castalia**: Cetatea Rațiunii, cartea a 7-a din „The Truth Series” a lui Dr. **Thomas Stark** (pseudonim) este acum disponibilă:

“**Şcientismul** geme acum sub greutatea tuturor afirmațiilor statistice false pe care se bazează, nu mai mult decât „piesele de rezistență” nebunești – **multiversul**, visul suprem umed al celor afectați de boala **Statisticii**, a adepţilor unui** Cazino Cosmic** în care nimic nu are o **Explicație**, dar totul are o **Probabilitate**. În **Realitate**, toate aceste Probabilități sunt false și nu există Cazinouri, fiecare răspuns fiind sigur 100%.

Când arunci un zar, vă puteți imagina că există o șansă de 1 la 6 pentru orice rezultat. Acest lucru este total fals. Există o certitudine de 100% a unui anumit rezultat de fiecare dată când arunci și dacă ai avea acces la cunoașterea totală a tuturor forțelor care acționează asupra zarului, ai ști sigur care ar fi rezultatul. „Probabilitatea” se referă la **ignoranța** dvs. empiricistă. Nu este universul care nu are **Cunoșt****ere**, ești tu. Este ignoranța dvs. care implică o analiză probabilistică. **Universul** nu are o astfel de ignoranță, de aceea niciodată nu folosește Probabilități în nici un caz. Probabilitățile sunt imposibile într-un univers condus de **the Principle of Sufficient Reason – PSR**, unde totul are o explicație exactă de ce este aşa și nu altfel.

Ceea ce **oamenii de știință** au făcut este să își proiecteze **ignoranța empiricistă** asupra universului, care este **Rațional**, nu **Empiric,** deci nu reflectă ignoranța empirică „man made”. Universul știe mereu ce se va întâmpla. Întotdeauna știe ce face. Nu există incertitudine ontologică. Nu trăim într-un cazinou cosmic. Dacă am fi făcut-o, nu ar exista altceva decât **Haos**, nu un **Cosmos**, adică un loc de** Existență Ordonată** și **Legi Raționale.**

**Principiul de Incertitudine** al lui **Heisenberg** este unul dintre fundamentele** ideologiei statistice**, aruncarea cu zaruri a scientismului. Acesta este Principiul cel mai prost interpretat din istorie. De îndată ce adăugați **Singularități Monadice Zero-Infinit** la **Spațiu** – un pas pe care scientismul refuză să-l facă –** Incertitudinea** dispare și este înlocuită de o** Certitudine** totală!

Prea mult pentru scientism. Indiferent de ceea ce predică scientismul, erorile sale pot fi imediat reinterpretate în termeni de **Raționalism** și **Idealism,** spre deosebire de **Empirism** și **Materialism**. Acesta din urmă susține viziunea Cazinoului asupra **Existenței.** Primul garantează că nu trăim într-un astfel de univers. Trăim într-un univers guvernat de **Principiul Suficientei Raţiuni/Motivări (PSR)** unde nu există nicio **Incertitudine**, nicio **Probabilitate** și nimic **Aleatoriu.** Nimic nu se întâmplă vreodată din întâmplare sau accident. Totul are o explicație exactă. Acesta este singurul mod în care putem trăi într-un **Univers Inteligibil, Rațional și Explicabil**“.