Vă invit să vă alăturaţi grupului Facebook Mişcarea DACIA, ce-şi propune un alt fel de a face politică!Citiţi partea introductivă şi proiectul de Program, iar dacă vă place, veniţi cu noi !
O puteţi face clicând alături imaginea, sau acest link
Posts Tagged ‘Bicameralism’
How to Become a Hero
![How to Become a Hero (The Hero-God Series Book 1) by [Faust, Michael]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51HyV-NRqCL.jpg)
How to Become a Hero
“The test of any man lies in action.” – Pindar
Everyone can become a hero. We have an inbuilt program for it, but few choose to activate it, or know where to begin.
Learn about your inner hero in terms of Jungian and Freudian psychology, creative writing theory, the theory of sympathetic magic, NLP, Nietzsche and existentialism.
En route, you will discover the horrors of the ultimate jail – the Panopticon – that shapes our world. You will stumble through Derrida’s method of deconstruction and learn if you are living in bad faith (according to Sartre).
What is the difference between the ego and the self? Is the self our soul, and does it have a direct connection to God? Is The Matrix the ultimate hero tale, and Neo the supreme hero?How does Bicameralism – Julian Jaynes’s theory that gods once “lived” in the right hemisphere of the human brain – fit in with the hero archetype?
Have you heard of “God’s Calculator”? How does the ancient pagan festival of Saturnalia make a mockery of Christmas? Where does WikiLeaks fit in? What is the tragic tale of the Lady of Shalott?
This is a book in a controversial series by the Pythagorean Illuminati. Do not read this book if you are a “cheap” person, an Abrahamist, a conspiracy theorist; if you are close-minded, petty, and a “moaner”. The world is sick of people like you. Heroes are never whiners and whingers.
***
Nothing will be the same. The super rich are finished. It was taking too long for humanity to wake up, so it summoned from its Collective Unconscious a virus that would shake the world to its foundations. It’s not business as usual after this. This is the Big One. Too much damage has been done for things to go back to the way they were. The 2008 crash should have led to a Revolution. It didn’t. Now Nature has intervened. This time, things will never be the same again. The super rich have lost all credibility. What did they do to save the world? The people that did all the heroic work were regular people: health workers, supermarket staff, truck drivers, everyone who kept the show on the road while braving THE VIRUS. We need these people. We don’t need the super rich. The pitchforks are coming out at last. The elites no longer have authority. Their “legitimacy” is gone. We now see them exposed for the absurdly overpaid clowns they are. There’s no way back for these chumps. The people have proved themselves. The people are the heroes. We don’t need the rich elites. We don’t need Trump in his golden tower, or any of these other super rich idiots. It’s all coming down. The center cannot hold. The Old World Order is done.
Bicameralism
“Jack Tanner’s most recent books in particular compare the left brain to consciousness, and the right brain to the unconscious, separate and devoid of language. This is why dreams, where the subconscious is in control, often seem so “unfamiliar” and are not linear, logical and contain no coherent written language. A different ‘type of consciousness’ is being expressed, and the normal, day to day ‘left brain’ consciousness is submerged and temporarily inactive. Lucid dreaming and OBEs are all about getting the ‘brainwaves’ in each hemisphere of the brain in the right configuration, and crucially it is all about having *different* brainwaves in each hemisphere, which leads to different types of mental ‘awareness’, some more logical, some less, some more focused, some totally passive, some in the liminal state between waking and sleep, etc.
An extract to consider (and perhaps you will want to study Mike Hockney’s and Jack Tanner’s books in more detail at some point).
GS 15. Mike Hockney. The Mathmos. ( https://www.amazon.com/Mathmos-God-Book-15…/dp/B00IRNC4IS )
“Neuroscientists are frequently those most heavily committed to the empiricist and materialist Meta Paradigm of science. They treat the brain purely in machine terms and have absolutely zero understanding of the human mind and Fourier mathematics. They are locked into seeing mental states as brain states. They have not, of course, been able to establish any link at all between our thoughts and our brain states (i.e. to read off our thoughts by seeing which parts of the brain are active at any instant), but nevertheless they have a quasi-religious faith that they will eventually be able to do so. They have no alternative paradigm for considering any other possibilities. They are like Catholics who believe that no interpretation of the world is possible other than that supplied by Catholic dogma. Rather ironically, neuroscientists don’t think at all. They are supremely lacking in imagination and intuition.
In the 1960s, Roger Sperry and his colleagues carried out “split brain” experiments on sufferers of epilepsy who’d had the corpus callosum (the tissue linking the two hemispheres of their brain) severed to reduce the severity of their attacks. Each hemisphere now operated in isolation, and was discovered to have markedly different properties from its erstwhile partner.
Sperry was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine/Physiology in 1981 for this groundbreaking work. It therefore beggars belief that a neuroscientist could attempt to say that people are not right-brained or left-brained. Of course they are!
Imagine a dominant husband and submissive wife in a house, and imagine that they communicate all the time. Are the decisions taken by the “household” likely to be those of the husband, wife, or both in exactly equal partnership? The fact that the two partners constantly communicate is wholly irrelevant to what decisions are made. Almost always, the preferences of the dominant partner will be manifested. It’s simply stupid – and unbelievable – for a professor to argue that the mere fact that hemispheres are linked somehow means that the hemispheres are equal partners.
The professor says there’s no evidence for right or left hemispheric dominance. On the contrary, there’s vast evidence for this, and none at all that the hemispheres are equal partners with equal influence. If they’re equal, what’s the evolutionary point of even having two hemispheres in the first place? The very fact that two brain hemispheres exist at all is extremely indicative that they have radically different lateral specialisations. If we didn’t need two hemispheres, we’d simply have a single, undivided brain.
Roger Sperry received his Nobel Prize precisely for his discoveries revealing the functional specialization of the cerebral hemispheres. The left hemisphere of the brain is associated with analytical and verbal tasks. The right hemisphere is skilled at spatial perception tasks and music. It has only rudimentary language abilities, but contributes emotional context and understanding to language, and allows us to visualise what the world represents.
‘The great pleasure and feeling in my right brain is more than my left brain can find the words to tell you.’ – Roger Sperry
Why do neuroscientists insist on spreading these silly myths that there’s no hemispheric brain specialisation? It’s because they are fanatical materialists, terrified of linking the different hemispheres to radically different mental properties, which would throw the entire materialist paradigm into doubt.
*****
The simple fact that most people are right handed rather than left handed or ambidextrous is blatant evidence that one hemisphere is superior to the other. If the hemispheres were equal partners, we should all be ambidextrous, or there should be as many left handers as right handers.
All of Jungian personality typing is based on hemispheric imbalance, with thinking and sensing being left brain properties, and feelings and intuition belonging to the right brain. Extraversion is a left brain property and faces out to the world (spacetime, matter and dimensionality), while introversion is a right brain property and faces in towards the interior world (the dimensionless mental Singularity). Neuroscientists don’t have a clue about any of this. Like old-style behaviourists (whom they strongly resemble), they regard the mind as ultimately non-existent or wholly irrelevant, and that only physical processes happening in the brain have any meaning.
The brain is the perfect dialectical instrument. The left brain is the thesis, the right brain the antithesis, and their common operations (reflecting a united brain) the synthesis.
We are nothing but creatures of hemispheric imbalance. Julian Jaynes’s brilliant theory of bicameralism is all about this imbalance. Jungian psychology is equally dominated by hemispheric imbalance. Neuroscience rejects all of this and blindly proceeds along the road to nowhere, to an “explanation” of mind based on mindless atoms! This, they claim, is rational. (…)
*****
(…)
No wonder there’s no evidence when people such as Blakemore are conducting the research. Her remarks demonstrate everything that’s wrong with science and its inherent prejudice against the mind. Blakemore, we can be 100% certain, is not devising any tests to test whether a child is left or right brained, since she has dismissed the whole concept right from the outset. We can be sure her equally blinkered, groupthink, careerist colleagues have exactly the same biases. You can’t get job in this field unless you agree with materialist dogma, just as you can’t get a job in the Catholic Church if you’re not a Catholic.
No one ever suggested that hemispheric dominance results in “blood flow” ever being cut off to the other hemisphere. For optimal functioning, the other hemisphere has to know what its partner is up to! That doesn’t make it an equal partner with equal executive decision-making importance. The unconscious mind is always aware what the conscious mind is doing, and often signalling to the conscious mind to do x rather than y. All of this is dismissed as nonsense by neuroscience, a bizarre subject that studies the brain while ignoring the mind!”
Thomas Foster – hyperian
Tags: Bicameralism
THE FLOW STATE
THE FLOW STATE
Illuminist transcendence is about achieving ultimate “flow”. Wikipedia says, “In positive psychology, flow, also known as the zone, is the mental state of operation in which a person performing an activity is fully immersed in a feeling of energized focus, full involvement, and enjoyment in the process of the activity. In essence, flow is characterized by complete absorption in what one does, and a resulting loss in one’s sense of space and time. … Achieving flow is often colloquially referred to as being in the zone. Flow shares many characteristics with hyperfocus.”
“If mind comes before and is superior to matter, that means the study of frequencies is everything. Which means that in order to strengthen our mind or understand the ‘hidden’ reality, we have to understand the frequency and waves. I have read a long time ago that based on our ‘state of mind’ we emit a different brainwave (from delta when we study, to beta). But there are higher frequencies such as gamma. That the higher the frequency is, the higher our brain power is. Maybe we can study higher frequencies and use them to increase our brain power. Maybe if they are used correctly, we can have easier access to mental mana figure memes.” – Anonymous
Such studies form a major activity of the Illuminati. One of the strands of the God Project is connected with exactly this.
“What is it about psychedelics that makes us more open to the non-local domain? Why does a rearrangement of brain connections, even temporary, cause such a profound effect on our psyche?” – Anonymous
Psychedelics disrupt the functioning of the spacetime-facing parts of our brain. Anything that reduces the dominance of spacetime (local) thinking automatically enhances our capacity to think in frequency (non-local) terms. Our brains are instruments designed by evolution in a highly specific way. When you introduce chemicals that are similar to chemicals that we use naturally (hence can be used by the brain), but are different enough to disrupt normal functioning, it’s somewhat akin to having a brain designed for the English language suddenly being exposed to nothing but the French language. Everything is different. Nothing makes sense anymore. You cannot understand what is going on. You are confused. You need a translator. People deliberately take drugs to try to escape from their normal states of mind.
Stark, Dr. Thomas. The Book of Mind: Seeking Gnosis (The Truth Series)
The Self is the archetype of wholeness, completion and ultimate synthesis. The Ego heroically journeys through the dark labyrinth of the psyche, where it encounters personifications of the various psychological archetypes until, at last, it comes face to face with God (the Self). ===== The transcendent function is the archetype of the union of opposites. It is the dialectal function. ===== Your own life concerns the life of the subjective psyche. If you can access the transpersonal life, you encounter the life of the objective psyche.
Bicameralism and the Self
Bicameralism is just a means of placing the Jungian Self in the right hemisphere of the brain and the Jungian Ego in the left hemisphere of the brain, with the corpus callosum – the thick band of nerve fibers connecting the left and right sides of the brain, allowing for communication between both hemispheres – serving as the Ego-Self axis, along which are located the Shadow, Anima/Animus and Mana Personalities. The bicameral human was much closer to the Self than modern conscious humans. We have become estranged from the Self. We have lost God, and all average people feel abandoned.
Stark, Dr. Thomas. The Stairway to Consciousness: The Birth of Self-Awareness from Unconscious Archetypes (The Truth Series Book 12) .
Despre BICAMERALISM
Eşti BICAMERALIST, sau NU!?
„În “Originea Conștienței în Colapsul Minții Bicamerale”, Julian Jaynes a susținut că mintea umană primitivă era mai degrabă „Bicamerală” decât Conștientă. Ceea ce a vrut să spună era că cele două emisfere ale creierului nostru aveau o relație asimetrică una cu cealaltă și că natura umană era împărțită în două prin cele două emisfere, cu o parte Dominantă numită „Zeu” (situat în emisfera dreaptă a creierului) , și o parte a Dominată numită „Om” (în emisfera stângă a creierului).
Când mintea bicamerală domnea, „Zeul” creierului din dreapta dădea ordine executate fără crâcneală de „Omul” din creierul din stânga. Creșterea Conștienței a implicat evoluția treptată a emisferei stângi, devenind mult mai puternică decât emisfera dreaptă, în final învingând-o în totalitate (ca noii zei Olimpici răsturnând vechii zei Titanici). „Zeul” a amuţit și numai „Omul” a rămas, dar acum acesta se putea imagina pe sine însuși ca un fel de Zeu.
Avraamismul păstrează un mare caracter bicameral. Pur și simplu a mutat zeul în emisfera dreaptă, proiectându-l/ antropomorfizându-l în ceruri. „Omul” avraamic se închină în continuare “Zeului”. În viziunea lui Jaynes, poemele epice ale lui Homer reflectă această minte bicamerală mai degrabă decât conștiența modernă, motiv pentru care cartea tratează zeii foarte mult ca și cum ar fi fost reali și direct experimentaţi. În același fel, Biblia reflectă mentalitatea bicamerală. Evreii, ca și grecii, au experimentat direct divinul. În zilele noastre, zeii sau Dumnezeu sunt tăcuți și par să nu interacționeze deloc cu noi. Ori Zeii au plecat – „God is dead – Nietzsche – (sau nu au existat), ori capacitatea noastră de a-i experimenta, sau credinţa că-i experimentăm, a fost pierdută.
Jaynes a oferit o explicație extrem de plauzibilă pentru ceea ce a avut loc: mințile bicamerale concepute pentru zei și dependente de zei au fost înlocuite de minți conștiente destinate acțiunii autonome (și care pot deveni ele însele zei). Bicameralismul este despre Mitul religios, în timp ce Conștiența adevărată este despre Logos şi Rațional.
De fapt, există două specii umane – specia Mythos și specia Logos, aceasta din urmă fiind mult mai evoluată. Omenirea „veche” se închină zeilor. Noua umanitate încearcă să devină zei. Majoritatea oamenilor – probabil 90% – au urme puternice vestigiale ale minții pre-moderne și pot ușor aluneca înapoi. Majoritatea oamenilor religioși din lume au doar un strat subțire de Conștiență, o Minte care este încă în esență Bicamerală. Fenomenul Hipnozei, a argumentat Jaynes, activează mintea bicamerală, cu hipnotizatorul Dominant care acționează ca „Zeu” asupra subiectului Hipnotizat/Dominat. Schizofrenia, a spus Jaynes, este o întoarcere pe deplin a bicameralismului, cu Conștiența victimei copleșită de „vocile zeilor” din capul lui, care îi ordonă.”
Mike Hockney – ”World Overworld Underworld Dreamworld”
Tags: Avraamism, Bicameralism, Conştienţă, Dominant, Dominat, Hipnoză, Julian Jaynes, Logos, Mytos, Nietzsche, raţiune, Schizofrenie, zei
ReLigare (9)
Experimentul Îngerul
„Îngerii există. De fapt, ei sunt în noi! Sau mai degrabă ei sunt Sinele nostru Superior. Din nefericire pentru noi, Conștiența noastră se află în Sinele Inferior, partea care este mult mai aproape de fiare decât de Dumnezeu. De aceea, atât de mulți oameni consideră această lume IAD, mai degrabă decât RAI.
Oamenii se întreabă despre Conștiență. Dumnezeu a folosit Îngerii pentru a face oamenii conștienți. Suntem numiți „maimuţa a cincea”. Ei bine, celelalte patru maimuțe nu sunt Conștiente. Legătura noastră divină este furnizată prin Îngeri.
Oamenii au o natură umană și angelică într-un singur trup, așa cum Isus Hristos ar fi avut o natură umană și divină într-un singur corp. Ingerul este ceea ce este cunoscut ca „îngerul nostru pazitor”.
Socrate l-a numit „Daemon” și îi atribuia toate deciziile sale importante.
Psihologul Julian Jaynes a introdus conceptul că oamenii au fost odată „bicamerali”. Jaynes a susținut că doar cu câteva mii de ani în urmă, oamenii NU erau Conștienți. În schimb, aveau o „parte Executivă care dădea comenzi”, și o „parte Ascultătoare” care urma instinctiv aceste comenzi. Executivul a fost numit „Dumnezeu” și a fost venerat de către om. Potrivit lui Jaynes, această structură dualistă a fost originea tuturor religiilor umane și a sistemelor spirituale.
Există două domenii în univers. Una este domeniul „științific” al spațiului, al timpului și al materiei. Acesta este numit domeniul „temporal”, domeniul muritorilor. Este un domeniu Local, unde totul este separat de orice altceva. Al doilea, este un domeniu Imaterial în afara spațiului și timpului. Aceasta este o Singularitate, făcută mai degrabă din Frecvențe decât din Materie. Aceasta se numește domeniul „Etern”. Din moment ce este indestructibil, este domeniul tuturor Nemuritorilor. Este un domeniu Non-Local. Nu poate fi înțeles de știință, deoarece se află în afara actualei Paradigme Ştiințifice. Este un domeniu Noumenal, Non-Senzorial pe care Experimentele nu îl pot atinge. Este, totuși, complet inteligibil prin limbajul perfect, infinit al lui Dumnezeu, al Naturii: MATEMATICA.
Acesta este un univers al Minții, nu un univers al Materiei. Oamenii sunt conectați la ambele domenii… prin Îngerii Păzitori, prin „Sinele nostru Superior”.
Nu este timpul să înțelegem adevărata natură a Realității, adevărata natură a Conștienței? Nu este timpul să învţăm secretele îngerilor? Nu este timpul să vă împliniți visele eliberându-vă propriul Înger Interior? Deveniți ființa glorioasă care ați fost destinată a fi.
Odată ce înțelegeți natura Îngerului, veți înțelege ce trebuie să faceți cu viața voastră. Veți cunoaște în sfârșit Semnificația Vieții Voastre.
Nu ascultați pe cei care vă propăvăduiesc azi actuala Paradigmă. Acești oameni sunt închiși în Sinele lor Inferior. Ei sunt „frânele” lumii noastre, ținându-ne pe toți închiși într-o Realitate Falsă.
Goethe a spus: „Nimeni nu este mai Sclav decât cei care cred în mod fals că sunt Liberi”.
E timpul să fim cu adevărat Liberi, și acest lucru poate fi realizat numai prin ridicarea spre Înălțimi, prin fuziunea cu Îngerul Păzitor, prin conexiunea noastră personală cu Divinul.
Un corp uman este doar o crisalidă. Omul – adevăratul om – este destinat să se supună unei metamorfozări complete și să-i crească aripi … ca un înger radiant.
Şi tu ești parte a Experimentului Divin.”
